1
|
Geremie T, Guiguet-Auclair C, Laroche ML, Mely P, Gerbaud L, Blanquet M. Deprescribing in older adults in a French community: a questionnaire study on patients' beliefs and attitudes. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:562. [PMID: 38937665 PMCID: PMC11212408 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05165-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND General practitioners (GPs) have a central role to play on reduction of polypharmacy and deprescribing. This study aimed to assess beliefs and attitudes towards deprescribing in patients, aged 65 years or older in primary care, and to identify factors associated with deprescribing and their willingness to stop medication. METHODS A questionnaire study was performed between 23 May and 29 July 2022 on patients aged 65 years or older attending a GP's surgery in a French area. We used the French version of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing self-report questionnaire (rPATD), which measures four subscales ("Burden", "Appropriateness", "Concerns about stopping" and, "Involvement"), patients' willingness to stop one of their regular medicines, and patients' satisfaction with their current medicines. RESULTS The study enrolled 200 patients. Median age was 76 years old (IQR 71-81), 55% were women, and 42.5% took 5 or more medications per day. Although most patients (92.5%) were satisfied with their current medicines, 35% were reluctant to stop medications they had been taking for a long time, and 89.5% were willing to stop medication if asked to by their GP. Patients aged less than 75 years old reported more concerns about stopping. Women and patients with higher educational attainment showed significantly higher involvement in medication management. CONCLUSIONS The majority of older adults were willing to stop one or more of their regular medicines if asked to do so by their GP. GPs should address deprescribing into their current practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Candy Guiguet-Auclair
- Public Health, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Clermont Auvergne INP, Clermont Auvergne College, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS Pascal Institute, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marie Laure Laroche
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Pharmacology- Toxicology and Centre of Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
- UR 24134 (Ageing, Frailty, Prevention, e-Health), Institute Omega Health, University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Pierre Mely
- Surgery of Riom-ès-Montagnes, Riom-ès-Montagnes, France
| | - Laurent Gerbaud
- Public Health, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Clermont Auvergne INP, Clermont Auvergne College, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS Pascal Institute, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marie Blanquet
- Public Health, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
- Clermont Auvergne INP, Clermont Auvergne College, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS Pascal Institute, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hung A, Kim YH, Pavon JM. Deprescribing in older adults with polypharmacy. BMJ 2024; 385:e074892. [PMID: 38719530 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2024]
Abstract
Polypharmacy is common in older adults and is associated with adverse drug events, cognitive and functional impairment, increased healthcare costs, and increased risk of frailty, falls, hospitalizations, and mortality. Many barriers exist to deprescribing, but increased efforts have been made to develop and implement deprescribing interventions that overcome them. This narrative review describes intervention components and summarizes findings from published randomized controlled trials that have tested deprescribing interventions in older adults with polypharmacy, as well as reports on ongoing trials, guidelines, and resources that can be used to facilitate deprescribing. Most interventions were medication reviews in primary care settings, and many contained components such as shared decision making and/or a focus on patient care priorities, training for healthcare professionals, patient facing education materials, and involvement of family members, representing great heterogeneity in interventions addressing polypharmacy in older adults. Just over half of study interventions were found to perform better than usual care in at least one of their primary outcomes, and most study interventions were assessed over 12 months or less.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Hung
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, NC, USA
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Co-first authors
| | - Yoon Hie Kim
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Co-first authors
| | - Juliessa M Pavon
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC) Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moreno Cruz CF, Monroy Hermosillo O, Thalasso F, Tzintzun Camacho O, Ramírez Vives F. Toilet effluent separation and brown water treatment: Survey and initial feasibility testing in Mexico. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 922:171281. [PMID: 38417526 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Separation of domestic effluents at the source and the utilization of low-flush toilets offer alternative approaches for developing efficient wastewater treatment systems while promoting energy generation through anaerobic digestion. This study focused on assessing toilet usage in Mexico and exploring the potential of anaerobic co-digestion of brown water (feces) and toilet paper as influential factors in wastewater treatment systems. A survey was conducted on a representative sample of Mexicans to gather information on toilet usage frequency, toilet paper use and disposal practices, as well as the type and quantity of commercial disinfectants and pharmaceutical compounds they use or consume. The survey revealed that per capita toilet paper consumption is 2.9 kg annually, that 58 % of respondents do not dispose used paper in the toilet, and that about 47 % use two to three cleaning and disinfection products. Notably, 97 % of the sampled Mexican population expressed a willingness to transition to more eco-friendly toilet options. Subsequently, in a second step, the anaerobic co-digestion of brown water with toilet paper was evaluated, demonstrating a relatively high production of volatile fatty acids but low methane production. This suggests an efficient hydrolysis/acidogenesis process coupled with restrained methanogenesis, probably due to pH decrease caused by acidogenesis. This study underscores that toilet paper and brown water are potential suitable substrates for anaerobic co-digestion. Furthermore, it sheds light on the behaviors of Mexican society regarding bathroom use and cleaning, contributing to the establishment of foundations for wastewater treatment systems with effluent separation at the source.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Francisco Moreno Cruz
- Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, Av. San Rafael Atlixco No. 186, Col. Vicentina, Iztapalapa, Ciudad de México C.P. 09340, Mexico; Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Instituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Carretera a Delta s/n, C.P. 21705, Ejido Nuevo León, Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico.
| | - Oscar Monroy Hermosillo
- Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, Av. San Rafael Atlixco No. 186, Col. Vicentina, Iztapalapa, Ciudad de México C.P. 09340, Mexico
| | - Frederic Thalasso
- Departamento de Biotecnología y Bioingeniería, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados (Cinvestav), Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, Col. San Pedro Zacatenco, Gustavo A. Madero, C.P. 07360 Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Olivia Tzintzun Camacho
- Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Instituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Carretera a Delta s/n, C.P. 21705, Ejido Nuevo León, Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
| | - Florina Ramírez Vives
- Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, Av. San Rafael Atlixco No. 186, Col. Vicentina, Iztapalapa, Ciudad de México C.P. 09340, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pereira A, Veríssimo M, Ribeiro O. Influence of chronic medical conditions on older patients' willingness to deprescribe medications: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:315. [PMID: 38575904 PMCID: PMC10993447 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04891-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aging correlates with a heightened prevalence of chronic diseases, resulting in multimorbidity affecting 60% of those aged 65 or older. Multimorbidity often leads to polypharmacy, elevating the risk of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and adverse health outcomes. To address these issues, deprescribing has emerged as a patient-centered approach that considers patients' beliefs and attitudes toward medication and reduces inappropriate polypharmacy in older adults. Our study aims to investigate whether certain chronic medical conditions are associated with older patients' willingness to deprescribe medications. METHODS A cross-sectional study enrolled 192 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 or older taking at least one regular medication. Data included demographics, clinical characteristics, and responses to the Portuguese revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire. Descriptive statistics characterized participants, while multiple binary logistic regression identified associations between chronic medical conditions and willingness to deprescribe. RESULTS Among the participants (median age: 72 years, 65.6% female), 91.6% had multimorbidity. The analysis revealed that willingness to deprescribe significantly increased with the presence of gastric disease (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.123; 95% CI 1.221, 13.915) and age (aOR = 1.121; 95% CI 1.009, 1.246). Conversely, prostatic pathology (aOR = 0.266; 95% CI 0.077, 0.916), higher scores in the rPATD appropriateness factor (aOR = 0.384; 95% CI 0.190, 0.773), and rPATD concerns about stopping factor (aOR = 0.450; 95% CI 0.229, 0.883) diminished patients' willingness to deprescribe. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the intricate relationship between older patients' attitudes toward deprescribing and chronic medical conditions. We found that gastric disease was associated with an increased willingness to deprescribe medications, while prostate disease was associated with the opposite effect. Future research should explore how patients with specific diseases or groups of diseases perceive deprescribing of medications general and for specific medications, aiding in the development of targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anabela Pereira
- Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Associate Laboratory RISE- Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Manuel Veríssimo
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Oscar Ribeiro
- Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Associate Laboratory RISE- Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ramsdale E, Mohamed M, Holmes HM, Zubkoff L, Bauer J, Norton SA, Mohile S. Decreasing polypharmacy in older adults with cancer: A pilot cluster-randomized trial protocol. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101687. [PMID: 38302299 PMCID: PMC10923001 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Polypharmacy is prevalent in older adults with cancer and associated with multiple adverse outcomes. A single-site, cluster-randomized clinical trial will enroll older adults with cancer and polypharmacy starting chemotherapy and will assess the effectiveness and feasibility of deprescribing interventions by comparing two arms: a pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention and a patient educational brochure. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study will be conducted in two phases. In phase I, focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews will guide adaptation of deprescribing interventions for the oncology clinic (phase Ia), and eight patients will undergo the pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention with iterative adaptations (phase Ib). In phase II, a pilot cluster-randomized trial (n = 72) will compare a pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention with a patient education brochure, with treating oncologists as the cluster. Both efficacy (relative dose intensity of planned chemotherapy, potentially inappropriate medications successfully deprescribed, chemotherapy toxicity, functional status, hospitalizations, falls, and symptoms) and implementation outcomes (barriers and facilitators) will be assessed. DISCUSSION This study is anticipated to provide pilot data to inform a nationwide randomized clinical trial of deprescribing in older adults starting cancer treatment. The cluster randomization is intended to provide an initial estimate for the intervention effect as well as oncologists' intra-class correlation coefficient. Deprescribing interventions may improve outcomes in older adults starting cancer treatment, but these interventions are understudied in this population, and it is unknown how best to implement them into oncology practice. The results of this trial will inform the design of large, randomized phase III trials of deprescribing. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier:NCT05046171. Date of registration: September 16, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Ramsdale
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA.
| | - Mostafa Mohamed
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Holly M Holmes
- Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, McGovern Medical School, TX, USA
| | - Lisa Zubkoff
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jessica Bauer
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Sally A Norton
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Supriya Mohile
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nguyen-Soenen J, Weir KR, Jungo KT, Perrot B, Fournier JP. Does missing data matter in the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing questionnaire? A systematic review and two case analyses. Res Social Adm Pharm 2024; 20:296-307. [PMID: 38168621 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire was developed to capture beliefs and perceptions of patients about deprescribing. In general, handling of missing data is underreported in survey studies. Underlying mechanisms related to missing data may impact the findings from survey studies. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the missing data in studies using the rPATD questionnaire through a systematic review and datasets from two studies. METHODS First, this review updated a systematic review on the rPATD (and other versions). We searched Medline via OVID, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science until 31st January 2023. Missing data reporting and methods to handle them were collected. Second, data from two deprescribing studies were analyzed using three methods of missing data handling: complete case analysis, personal mean substitution, and multiple imputation. We compared the scores from each domain and the associations of the domains with two questions from the rPATD to highlight how using different methods can influence the interpretation of study findings. RESULTS We identified 49 studies: 31 (63 %) from this study and 18 (37 %) from the original systematic review. The question or domain with the most missing data could be identified in 9 studies (18.4 %). Missing data management was reported in 19 studies (38.8 %). In one case analysis, the "Burden" domain was significantly associated with the question "I would like to try stopping one of my medicines to see how I feel without it" using complete case analysis (p = 0.044) or multiple imputation (p = 0.038), but not when using personal mean substitution (p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS Missing data and methods used to handle missing data were underreported in studies using the rPATD questionnaire. The methods should be chosen carefully as our analyses from two distinct studies suggest that they may impact the interpretation of the findings from the questionnaire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Nguyen-Soenen
- SPHERE - UMR INSERM 1246, Nantes Université, Université de Tours, France; Département de Médecine Générale, Faculté de Médecine, Nantes Université, France.
| | - Kristie Rebecca Weir
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Katharina Tabea Jungo
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bastien Perrot
- SPHERE - UMR INSERM 1246, Nantes Université, Université de Tours, France; Direction de la recherche, Plateforme de Méthodologie et Biostatistique, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Jean-Pascal Fournier
- SPHERE - UMR INSERM 1246, Nantes Université, Université de Tours, France; Département de Médecine Générale, Faculté de Médecine, Nantes Université, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yu R, Xu Z, Lu Y, Zhu Y, Chen L. Attitudes and health behaviors of middle-aged and older adults with elevated tumor markers in China. Front Psychol 2024; 15:1265648. [PMID: 38379627 PMCID: PMC10878324 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1265648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To understand the attitudes and health behaviors of middle-aged and older adults in China after receiving elevated results of tumor markers (TMs) test in the annual health examinations (AHEs) and explore the influencing factors. Methods A three-section online questionnaire survey was conducted from March 1 to April 30, 2020 in Hangzhou, China, to people who were aged 45 and older and had at least one elevated result of TMs test. Clinical information was collected from the online survey and medical records. Descriptive statistics were carried out followed by regression analyses. Results Of 380 participants, 76.1% were unwilling to quit the TMs test in AHEs, whereas 75.3% would take the doctor's advice and quit unnecessary TMs test; 67.4% felt stressed about their TMs. Among participants with elevated TMs, 76.8% changed lifestyle to keep healthy, 74.2% sought health information, 58.9% requested a TMs retest, and 50.3% did further tests to confirm a diagnosis. Family history of cancer was associated with lifestyle changing; education level, area of residence and health insurance were associated with health information seeking; comorbidity were associated with retests and sequential confirming tests. Conclusion The application of the TMs test in AHEs among Chinese people may lead to positive and negative behavioral consequences and psychological distress. Doctors have a significant impact on patients' health behaviors. Accurate indications and adequate communication with patients before and after the TMs test are in great need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renke Yu
- Department of General Practice, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhijie Xu
- Department of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yiting Lu
- Department of General Practice, Zhongdai Community Healthcare Center, Huzhou, China
| | - Yue Zhu
- Department of General Practice, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Liying Chen
- Department of General Practice, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carver J, Springer SP. Patient Attitudes Toward Deprescribing Among Community-Dwelling Older Mainers. Sr Care Pharm 2024; 39:30-41. [PMID: 38160235 DOI: 10.4140/tcp.n.2024.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Background The excess use of medications has become an increasingly prevalent issue in health care. Deprescribing can be an important tool in combating polypharmacy. Objective To assess the attitudes of community-dwelling older persons in Maine toward their medications and the concept of deprescription. An additional aim of this research was to assess the association between the revised Patient Attitudes Toward Deprescribing Questionnaire (rPATDQ) domains by polypharmacy status. Methods Researchers conducted a cross-sectional study utilizing the rPATDQ. Authors recruited older Mainers via a longitudinal cohort study through the University of New England Center for Excellence in Aging in Health. Respondents were stratified by polypharmacy status (fewer than five medications, five or more medications). Results Total daily medications ranged from 1 to 30 (average of 8.6). Overall, 83.6% of respondents agreed/strongly agreed to the statement "If my doctor said it was possible, I would be willing to stop one or more of my regular medicines." 70.6% agreed/ strongly agreed to the statement "Overall, I am satisfied with my current medicines." Those with and without polypharmacy experienced low overall medication burden and a high belief in the appropriateness of their medications. There were no statistically significant differences between polypharmacy groups. Conclusion The results of this survey indicate that the factors affecting attitudes toward deprescribing are complex. While many indicated willingness to deprescribe at least one medication, there was a high degree of satisfaction with current medication regimens. This study highlights the need for further qualitative research to identify potential barriers to deprescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Carver
- University of New England School of Pharmacy, Portland, Maine
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Langford AV, Schneider CR, Lin CC, Bero L, Collins JC, Suckling B, Gnjidic D. Patient-targeted interventions for opioid deprescribing: An overview of systematic reviews. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2023; 133:623-639. [PMID: 36808693 PMCID: PMC10953356 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deprescribing (reduction or cessation) of prescribed opioids can be challenging for both patients and healthcare professionals. OBJECTIVE To synthesize and evaluate evidence from systematic reviews examining the effectiveness and outcomes of patient-targeted opioid deprescribing interventions for all types of pain. METHODS Systematic searches were conducted in five databases with results screened against predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were (i) reduction in opioid dose, reported as change in oral Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (oMEDD) and (ii) success of opioid deprescribing, reported as the proportion of the sample for which opioid use declined. Secondary outcomes included pain severity, physical function, quality of life and adverse events. The certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. FINDINGS Twelve reviews were eligible for inclusion. Interventions were heterogeneous in nature and included pharmacological (n = 4), physical (n = 3), procedural (n = 3), psychological or behavioural (n = 3) and mixed (n = 5) interventions. Multidisciplinary care programmes appeared to be the most effective intervention for opioid deprescribing; however, the certainty of evidence was low, with significant variability in opioid reduction across interventions. CONCLUSIONS Evidence is too uncertain to draw firm conclusions about specific populations who may derive the greatest benefit from opioid deprescribing, warranting further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aili V. Langford
- Centre for Medicine Use and SafetyMonash UniversityParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of PharmacyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Carl R. Schneider
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of PharmacyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Chung‐Wei Christine Lin
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Sydney Musculoskeletal HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lisa Bero
- School of Medicine, Colorado School of Public Health and Center for Bioethics and HumanitiesUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CenterDenverColoradoUSA
| | - Jack C. Collins
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of PharmacyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Benita Suckling
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of PharmacyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Pharmacy DepartmentCaboolture Hospital, Queensland HealthBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Danijela Gnjidic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of PharmacyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pereira A, Ribeiro O, Veríssimo M. Predictors of older patients' willingness to have medications deprescribed: A cross-sectional study. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2023; 133:703-717. [PMID: 37070165 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deprescribing is a complex process requiring a patient-centred approach. One frequently expressed deprescribing barrier is patients' attitudes and beliefs towards deprescribing. This study aimed to identify the predictors of patients' willingness to have medications deprescribed. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted with community-dwelling patients aged ≥65 who are taking at least one regular medication. Data collection included patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and the Portuguese revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to present the patients' characteristics. Multiple binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of the patients' willingness to have medications deprescribed. RESULTS One hundred ninety-two participants (median age 72 years; 65.6% female) were included. Most (83.33%) were willing to have medications deprescribed, and the predictors were age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.136; 95% CI 1.026, 1.258), female sex (aOR = 3.036; 95% CI 1.059, 8.708) and the rPATD concerns about stopping factor (aOR = 0.391; 95% CI 0.203, 0.754). CONCLUSIONS Most patients were willing to have their medications deprescribed if it is recommended by their doctors. Older age and female sex increased the odds of willingness to deprescribe; higher concerns about stopping medications decreased the odds. These findings suggest that addressing patients' concerns about stopping their medicines may contribute to deprescribing success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anabela Pereira
- Department of Education and Psychology of the University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research at the Associate Laboratory RISE, Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Oscar Ribeiro
- Department of Education and Psychology of the University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research at the Associate Laboratory RISE, Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Manuel Veríssimo
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chan B, Isenor JE, Kennie-Kaulbach N. Categorization of deprescribing communication tools: A scoping review. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2023; 133:640-652. [PMID: 37170716 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deprescribing can be beneficial to a wide variety of patients but is often not done due to barriers including lack of time and challenges starting conversations. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to identify and broadly categorize existing deprescribing communication tools for clinicians and patients. METHODS Our scoping review protocol was based on the Arksey and O'Malley methods and incorporated the Levac and Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations. EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and grey literature were searched, with two independent reviewers assessing eligibility. A backwards search of the texts chosen for full text screen was completed. Two reviewers independently completed data extraction using a pre-specified data collection form. FINDINGS Databases identified 1121 results, searching of grey literature identified 49 results, and backwards searching identified 1323 results. After screening, 32 resources were included which contained 40 unique tools. Most tools were Canadian and targeted adults over 65 years old living in the community. Most tools had not been tested in the intended patient audience or evaluated for effectiveness. DISCUSSION Deprescribing tools have been developed to facilitate conversations by providing structure, education, and decision-making approaches. More research is needed to test the effectiveness of existing tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridgette Chan
- Dalhousie Faculty of Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Jennifer E Isenor
- College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Natalie Kennie-Kaulbach
- Practice Experience Program, College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bucsa C, Onea M, Rusu A, Farcas A, Porojan M, Dumitrascu D, Iaru I, Leucuta D, Mogosan C, Reeve E, Moga D. Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the revised patients' attitudes towards deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in Romanian older adults. Res Social Adm Pharm 2023; 19:1471-1479. [PMID: 37495451 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deprescribing is part of ensuring appropriate medication use and may reduce medication-related harm. Capturing the beliefs and attitudes of patients towards deprescribing by using a validated tool may support optimizing medication use in practice. OBJECTIVES To translate, culturally adapt and validate the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in Romanian and to investigate the attitudes and beliefs of older adults towards deprescribing. METHODS The rPATD questionnaire was translated using forward-backward translation into Romanian and culturally adapted. The psychometric properties were evaluated in older adults ≥65 years of age. Structural validity was assessed by item load on factors using an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) which was compared to the original English version and the internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was evaluated by calculating the Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between the factor scores obtained using the revised version of the Romanian rPATD and scores on the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) Specific Concerns Romanian version. Floor and ceiling effect were also examined. RESULTS We translated the questionnaire and administered it to 224 participants (median age 72 years [interquartile range: 68.0; 77.0]). In the EFA individual items loaded onto 4 factors, grouped similarly to the English version (Involvement, Burden, Appropriateness, Concerns about Stopping factors). Two items from each of the Involvement and Appropriateness factors were removed to improve factor loading and avoid cross-loading. The Cronbach's alpha values for the 4 factors ranged between 0.522 and 0.773. The scores for Burden and Concerns about Stopping factors were found to be positively correlated with BMQ Specific Concerns score. We identified a ceiling effect for one of the four factors (Involvement) and no floor effects. CONCLUSIONS The Romanian rPATD was validated in 4 factor structure similar to the original English questionnaire. The Romanian version of the questionnaire may support the health care professionals in Romania to initiate and support patient-centered deprescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Bucsa
- Pharmacovigilance Research Center, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - M Onea
- Pharmacovigilance Research Center, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - A Rusu
- Department of Diabetes and Nutrition Diseases, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - A Farcas
- Pharmacovigilance Research Center, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - M Porojan
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - D Dumitrascu
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - I Iaru
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Physiopathology, Faculty of Pharmacy, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - D Leucuta
- Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - C Mogosan
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Physiopathology, Faculty of Pharmacy, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - E Reeve
- Monash University, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; University of South Australia, Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - D Moga
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ramsdale E, Malhotra A, Holmes HM, Zubkoff L, Wang J, Mohile S, Norton SA, Duberstein PR. Emotional barriers and facilitators of deprescribing for older adults with cancer and polypharmacy: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:636. [PMID: 37847423 PMCID: PMC10581937 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08084-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe emotional barriers and facilitators to deprescribing (the planned reduction or discontinuation of medications) in older adults with cancer and polypharmacy. METHODS Virtual focus groups were conducted over Zoom with 5 key informant groups: oncologists, oncology nurses, primary care physicians, pharmacists, and patients. All groups were video- and audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using inductive content analysis, and open coding was performed by two coders. A codebook was generated based on the initial round of open coding and updated throughout the analytic process. Codes and themes were discussed for each transcript until consensus was reached. Emotion coding (identifying text segments expressing emotion, naming the emotion, and assigning a label of positive or negative) was performed by both coders to validate the open coding findings. RESULTS All groups agreed that polypharmacy is a significant problem. For clinicians, emotional barriers to deprescribing include fear of moral judgment from patients and colleagues, frustration toward patients, and feelings of incompetence. Oncologists and patients expressed ambivalence about deprescribing due to role expectations that physicians "heal with med[ication]s." Emotional facilitators of deprescribing included the involvement of pharmacists, who were perceived to be neutral, discerning experts. Pharmacists described emotionally aware communication strategies when discussing deprescribing with other clinicians and expressed increased awareness of patient context. CONCLUSION Deprescribing can elicit strong and predominantly negative emotions among clinicians and patients which could inhibit deprescribing interventions. The involvement of pharmacists in deprescribing interventions could mitigate these emotional barriers. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05046171 . Date of registration: September 16, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Ramsdale
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Arul Malhotra
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Holly M Holmes
- Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lisa Zubkoff
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jinjiao Wang
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Supriya Mohile
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Sally A Norton
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Paul R Duberstein
- Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hall RK, Rutledge J, Lucas A, Liu CK, Clair Russell JS, Peter WS, Fish LJ, Colón-Emeric C. Stakeholder Perspectives on Factors Related to Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Older Adults Receiving Dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 18:1310-1320. [PMID: 37499693 PMCID: PMC10578639 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.0000000000000229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Potentially inappropriate medications, or medications that generally carry more risk of harm than benefit in older adults, are commonly prescribed to older adults receiving dialysis. Deprescribing, a systematic approach to reducing or stopping a medication, is a potential solution to limit potentially inappropriate medications use. Our objective was to identify clinicians and patient perspectives on factors related to deprescribing to inform design of a deprescribing program for dialysis clinics. METHODS We conducted rapid qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews and focus groups with clinicians (dialysis clinicians, primary care providers, and pharmacists) and patients (adults receiving hemodialysis aged 65 years or older and those aged 55-64 years who were prefrail or frail) from March 2019 to December 2020. RESULTS We interviewed 76 participants (53 clinicians [eight focus groups and 11 interviews] and 23 patients). Among clinicians, 24 worked in dialysis clinics, 18 worked in primary care, and 11 were pharmacists. Among patients, 13 (56%) were aged 65 years or older, 14 (61%) were Black race, and 16 (70%) reported taking at least one potentially inappropriate medication. We identified four themes (and corresponding subthemes) of contextual factors related to deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications: ( 1 ) system-level barriers to deprescribing (limited electronic medical record interoperability, time constraints and competing priorities), ( 2 ) undefined comanagement among clinicians (unclear role delineation, clinician caution about prescriber boundaries), ( 3 ) limited knowledge about potentially inappropriate medications (knowledge limitations among clinicians and patients), and ( 4 ) patients prioritize symptom control over potential harm (clinicians expect resistance to deprescribing, patient weigh risks and benefits). CONCLUSIONS Challenges to integration of deprescribing into dialysis clinics included siloed health systems, time constraints, comanagement behaviors, and clinician and patient knowledge and attitudes toward deprescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasheeda K. Hall
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Medicine Service, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jeanette Rutledge
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Anika Lucas
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Medicine Service, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christine K. Liu
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | - Jennifer St. Clair Russell
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Dimensions of Care, LLC, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Wendy St. Peter
- Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Laura J. Fish
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Cathleen Colón-Emeric
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Medicine Service, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shantsila E, Lip GYH, Shantsila A, Kurpas D, Beevers G, Gill PS, Williams NH. Antihypertensive treatment in people of very old age with frailty: time for a paradigm shift? J Hypertens 2023; 41:1502-1510. [PMID: 37432893 DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000003495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
The optimal management of hypertension in individuals aged 80 years or older with frailty remains uncertain due to multiple gaps in evidence. Complex health issues, polypharmacy, and limited physiological reserve make responding to antihypertensive treatments unpredictable. Patients in this age group may have limited life expectancy, so their quality of life should be prioritized when making treatment decisions. Further research is needed to identify which patients would benefit from more relaxed blood pressure targets and which antihypertensive medications are preferable or should be avoided. A paradigm shift is required in attitudes towards treatment, placing equal emphasis on deprescribing and prescribing when optimizing care. This review discusses the current evidence on managing hypertension in individuals aged 80 years or older with frailty, but further research is essential to address the gaps in knowledge and improve the care of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Shantsila
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gregory Y H Lip
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Alena Shantsila
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Donata Kurpas
- Health Sciences Faculty, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
- Primary Care and Risk Factor Management Section, European Association of Preventative Cardiology, European Heart House, Les Templiers, Sophia Antipolis
- International Advisory Board of EURIPA (WONCA) - France
- International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC), Schiphol Airport, The Netherlands
| | - Gareth Beevers
- University of Birmingham, Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham
| | - Paramjit S Gill
- Academic Unit of Primary Care Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick Coventry, UK
| | - Nefyn H Williams
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gadisa DA, Gebremariam ET, Yimer G, Deresa Urgesa E. Attitudes of Older Adult Patients and Caregivers Towards Deprescribing of Medications in Ethiopia. Clin Interv Aging 2023; 18:1129-1143. [PMID: 37522072 PMCID: PMC10378541 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s400698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Deprescribing is essential for reducing inappropriate medication use and polypharmacy. For a holistic approach, it is essential to know how older adult patients and their caregivers perceive deprescribing. Objective To assess the attitude of older adult patients and caregivers towards deprescribing medication at Ambo University Referral Hospital. Methodology Institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted using the revised Patients' Attitude Towards Deprescribing tool (rPATD). The data was analyzed using the SPSS-25 software. Backward linear regression and logistic regression were used to measure association between outcome and determinant variables. The two-sided P-value ≤0.05 with 95% confidence interval was utilized for reporting significant factors. Results One hundred fifty-six (81.3%) of the respondents (ie, 85.0% of older adult and 77.2% of caregivers) agreed to stop one or more of their regular medications if the physician said it was possible despite 98 (51.0%) of them (ie, 49.0% of older adult and 53.3% of caregivers) being satisfied with their/their care recipient's medications. On the overall aggregate mean score, the respondents had a neutral position (2.6-3.59) regarding the burden and concerns of stopping medications whereas the majority of them disagree (1.0-2.59) with the inappropriateness of the medication they were taking and agreed (3.6-5.0) with the need for their involvement in treatment decision making. Concerns about stopping medicine scores (AOR = 0.440, 95% CI = 0.262-0.741, P = 0.035) and perceived levels of medication inappropriateness (AOR = 0.653, 95% CI = 0.456-0.936, P = 0.020) was significantly associated with the willingness to discontinue and overall satisfaction with their medicine regimen respectively. Conclusion The majority of older adult patients and caregivers would like to deprescribe if the physicians recommended it. The perceived concerns of stopping and inappropriateness of the medicines were associated with the willingness to deprescribe and overall satisfaction with their medicine respectively. Healthcare providers should prompt the deprescribing process with older adult patients and caregivers by addressing their concerns about stopping medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diriba Alemayehu Gadisa
- Pharmacy Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Oromia, Ethiopia
| | | | - Getnet Yimer
- Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Center for Global Genomics & Health Equity, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Efa Deresa Urgesa
- Contract Director Management Department, Ethiopian Pharmaceutical Supply Service, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hung A, Wang J, Moriarty F, Manja V, Eshetie T, Tegegn HG, Anderson TS, Radomski TR, Steinman MA. Value assessment of deprescribing interventions: Suggestions for improvement. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:2023-2027. [PMID: 36808728 PMCID: PMC10258143 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Hung
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jinjiao Wang
- Elaine Hubbard Center for Nursing Research on Aging, School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Frank Moriarty
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Veena Manja
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States
- Department of Health Policy, Stanford University, CA, United States
| | - Tesfahun Eshetie
- Registry of Senior Australians. Healthy Ageing Research Consortium. South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide SA, Australia
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA, Australia
| | | | - Timothy S. Anderson
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Thomas R. Radomski
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Michael A. Steinman
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vordenberg SE, Weir KR, Jansen J, Todd A, Schoenborn N, Scherer AM. Harm and Medication-Type Impact Agreement with Hypothetical Deprescribing Recommendations: a Vignette-Based Experiment with Older Adults Across Four Countries. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:1439-1448. [PMID: 36376636 PMCID: PMC10160278 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07850-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about what factors are important to older adults when deciding whether to agree with a recommendation to deprescribe. OBJECTIVE To explore the extent to which medication type and rationale for potential discontinuation influence older adults' acceptance of deprescribing. DESIGN Cross-sectional 2 (drug: lansoprazole - treat indigestion; simvastatin - prevent cardiovascular disease) by 3 (deprescribing rationale: lack of benefit; potential for harm; both) experimental design. PARTICIPANTS Online panelists aged ≥65 years from Australia, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States INTERVENTIONS: Participants were presented with a hypothetical patient experiencing polypharmacy whose PCP discussed stopping a medication. We randomized participants to receive one of six vignettes. MAIN MEASURES We measured agreement with deprescribing (6-point Likert scale, "Strongly disagree (1)" and "Strongly agree (6)") for the hypothetical patient as the primary outcome. We also measured participants' personality traits, perceptions of risk and uncertainty, and attitudes towards polypharmacy and deprescribing. KEY RESULTS Among 5311 participants (93.3% completion rate), the mean (M) agreement with deprescribing for the hypothetical patient was 4.71 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.67, 4.75). Participants reported higher agreement with stopping lansoprazole (n=2656) (M=4.90, 95% CI: 4.85, 4.95) compared to simvastatin (n=2655) (M=4.53, 95% CI: 4.47, 4.58), P<.001. Participants who received the combination rationale (n=1786) reported higher agreement with deprescribing (M=4.83, 95% CI: 4.76, 4.89) compared to those who received the rationales on lack of benefit (n=1755) (M=4.66, 95% CI: 4.60, 4.73) or potential for harm (n=1770) (M=4.65, 95% CI 4.58, 4.72). In adjusted regression analyses (n=5062), participants with a higher desire to engage in health promotion behaviors (b=0.08, 95% CI 0.02, 0.13) or need for certainty (b=0.12, 95% CI 0.04, 0.20) reported higher agreement with deprescribing. CONCLUSIONS Older adults across four countries were accepting of deprescribing in the setting of polypharmacy. The medication type and rationale for discontinuation were important factors in the decision-making process. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04676282, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04676282?term=vordenberg&draw=2&rank=1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Vordenberg
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, 428 Church St, 3563 NUB, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Kristie Rebecca Weir
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Adam Todd
- Newcastle University School of Pharmacy, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Aaron M Scherer
- University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zreik J, Kato M, Bailey B, Biggs WS, Hamadeh G. Polypharmacy Prevalence and Perceptions of Deprescribing in Elderly Patients Among Community Primary Care Providers in Mid-Michigan Practices. Cureus 2023; 15:e39399. [PMID: 37378090 PMCID: PMC10292136 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.39399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Polypharmacy is common among the elderly and can predispose them to increased morbidity and higher healthcare expenditures. Deprescribing is an important aspect of preventative medicine to minimize polypharmacy-related adverse effects. Mid-Michigan has historically been considered a medically underserved area. We sought to describe polypharmacy prevalence and primary care provider (PCP) perceptions of deprescribing in the elderly at community practices in the region. METHODS Medicare Part D claims data from 2018 to 2020 were queried to calculate the prevalence of polypharmacy, which is defined as Medicare beneficiaries who were concurrently prescribed at least five medications. PCPs from four community practices in adjacent counties in mid-Michigan, including two high- and two low-prescribing practices, were surveyed to assess their perceptions of deprescribing. RESULTS The prevalence of polypharmacy in two adjacent mid-Michigan counties was 44.0% and 42.5%, which was similar to Michigan's overall prevalence of 40.7% (p = 0.720 and 0.844, respectively). Additionally, 27 survey responses were received from mid-Michigan PCPs (response rate, 30.7%). Most respondents expressed confidence in deprescribing in the elderly from a clinical standpoint (66.7%). Barriers to deprescribing included patient/family concerns (70.4%) and lack of time during office visits (37.0%). Facilitators to deprescribing included patient readiness (18.5%), collaboration with case managers/pharmacists (18.5%), and up-to-date medication lists (18.5%). An exploratory comparison of perceptions at high- and low-prescribing practices showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate a high prevalence of polypharmacy in mid-Michigan and suggest that PCPs in the region are generally supportive of deprescribing. Potential targets to improve deprescribing in patients with polypharmacy include addressing visit length, patient/family concerns, increasing interdisciplinary collaboration, and medication reconciliation support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jad Zreik
- Internal Medicine, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Saginaw, USA
| | - Mark Kato
- Public Health, Michigan Health Improvement Alliance, Midland, USA
| | - Beth Bailey
- Health Services Research, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Saginaw, USA
| | - Wendy S Biggs
- Family Medicine, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, USA
| | - Ghassan Hamadeh
- Family Medicine, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Saginaw, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mohammed MA, Harrison J, Milosavljevic A, Chan AHY. Attitude towards deprescribing and its association with frailty and complexity of medication regimen: A survey of older inpatients in a district health board in New Zealand. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:166. [PMID: 36959598 PMCID: PMC10035261 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03878-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older inpatients, particularly those with frailty, have increased exposure to complex medication regimens. It is not known whether frailty and complexity of medication regimens influence attitudes toward deprescribing. This study aimed to investigate (1) older inpatients' attitudes toward deprescribing; (2) if frailty and complexity of medication regimen influence attitudes and willingness to deprescribe - a relationship that has not been investigated in previous studies. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, older adults (≥ 65 years) recruited from general medicine and geriatric services in a New Zealand hospital completed the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire. Hospital frailty risk score (HFRS) was calculated using diagnostic codes and other relevant information present at the time of index hospital admission; higher scores indicate higher frailty risk. Medication regimen complexity was quantified using the medication regimen complexity index (MRCI); higher scores indicate greater complexity. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of attitudes and willingness to deprescribe. RESULTS A total of 222 patients were included in the study, the median age was 83 years and 63% were female. One in two patients reported feeling they were taking too many medications, and 1 in 5 considered their medications burdensome. Almost 3 in 4 (73%) wanted to be involved in decision-making about their medications, and 4 in 5 (84%) were willing to stop one or more of their medications if their prescriber said it was possible. Patients with higher MRCI had increased self-reported medication burden (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.6, 95% CI 1.29, 5.29) and were more interested in being involved in decision-making about their medications (AOR 1.8, CI 0.99, 3.42) than those with lower MRCI. Patients with moderate HFRS had lower odds of willingness to deprescribe (AOR 0.45, CI 0.22,0.92) compared to the low-risk group. Female patients had a lower desire to be involved in decision-making. The oldest old age group( > 80 years) had lower self-reported medication burden and were less likely to want to try stopping their medications. CONCLUSION Most older inpatients wanted to be involved in decision-making about their medications and were willing to stop one or more medications if proposed by their prescriber. Medication complexity and frailty status influence patients' attitudes toward deprescribing and thus should be taken into consideration when making deprescribing decisions. Further research is needed to investigate the relationship between frailty and the complexity of medication regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed A Mohammed
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Jeff Harrison
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Aleksandra Milosavljevic
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Amy Hai Yan Chan
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kim JL, Lewallen KM, Hollingsworth EK, Shah AS, Simmons SF, Vasilevskis EE. Patient-Reported Barriers and Enablers to Deprescribing Recommendations During a Clinical Trial (Shed-MEDS). THE GERONTOLOGIST 2023; 63:523-533. [PMID: 35881109 PMCID: PMC10028229 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnac100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Effective deprescribing requires shared decision making between a patient and their clinician, and should be used when implementing evidence-based deprescribing conversations. As part of the Shed-MEDS clinical trial, this study assessed barriers and enablers that influence patient decision making in deprescribing to inform future implementation efforts and adaptations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Shed-MEDS, a randomized controlled deprescribing trial, included hospitalized older adults discharging to post-acute care facilities. A trained clinician reviewed each participant's medical history and medication list to identify medications with potential for deprescribing. The study clinician then conducted a semistructured patient-centered deprescribing interview to determine patient (or surrogate) concerns about medications and willingness to deprescribe. Reeve et al.'s (2013) framework was used to categorize barriers and enablers to deprescribing from the patient's perspective, including "appropriateness of cessation," "fear," "dislike of a medication," "influences," and "process of cessation." RESULTS Overall, participants/surrogates (N = 177) agreed with 63% (883 total medications) of the study clinician's deprescribing recommendations. Thematic analysis revealed that "appropriateness" of a medication was the most common barrier (88.2%) and enabler (67.3%) to deprescribing. Other deprescribing enablers were in the following domains: "influences" (22.7%), "process" (22.5%), "pragmatic" (19.4%), and "dislike" (5.3%). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS Use of a semistructured deprescribing interview conversation tool allowed study clinicians to elicit individual barriers and enablers to deprescribing from the patient's perspective. Participants in this study expressed more agreement than disagreement with study clinicians' deprescribing recommendations. These results should inform future implementation efforts that incorporate a patient-centered framework during deprescribing conversations. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02979353.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Kim
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kanah M Lewallen
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Emily K Hollingsworth
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Avantika S Shah
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sandra F Simmons
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education, & Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Tennessee Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Eduard E Vasilevskis
- Geriatric Research, Education, & Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Tennessee Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine & Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sheehan OC, Gleason KS, Bayliss EA, Green AR, Drace ML, Norton J, Reeve E, Shetterly SM, Weffald LA, Sawyer JK, Maciejewski ML, Kraus C, Maiyani M, Wolff J, Boyd CM. Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations-Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:774-784. [PMID: 36508725 PMCID: PMC11163949 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions, increasing risks of adverse drug events, hospitalization, and death. Deprescribing, the process of reducing or stopping potentially inappropriate medications, may improve outcomes. The OPTIMIZE pragmatic trial examined whether educating and activating patients, family members and clinicians about deprescribing reduces number of chronic medications and potentially inappropriate medications. Acceptability and challenges of intervention delivery in cognitively impaired older adults are not well understood. METHODS We explored mechanisms of intervention implementation through post hoc qualitative interviews and surveys with stakeholder groups of 15 patients, 7 caregivers, and 28 clinicians. We assessed the context in which the intervention was delivered, its implementation, and mechanisms of impact. RESULTS Acceptance of the intervention was affected by contextual factors including cognition, prior knowledge of deprescribing, communication, and time constraints. All stakeholder groups endorsed the acceptability, importance, and delivery of the intervention. Positive mechanisms of impact included patients scheduling specific appointments to discuss deprescribing and providers being prompted to consider deprescribing. Recollection of intervention materials was inconsistent but most likely shortly after intervention delivery. Short visit times remained the largest provider barrier to deprescribing. CONCLUSIONS Our work identifies key learnings in intervention delivery that can guide future scaling of deprescribing interventions in this population. We highlight the critical roles of timing and repetition in intervention delivery to cognitively impaired populations and the barrier posed by short consultation times. The acceptability of the intervention to patients and family members highlights the potential to incorporate deprescribing education into routine clinical practice and expand proven interventions to other vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orla C Sheehan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Connolly Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kathy S Gleason
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Bayliss
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Ariel R Green
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Melanie L Drace
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jonathan Norton
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Emily Reeve
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Australia
| | - Susan M Shetterly
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Linda A Weffald
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jennifer K Sawyer
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Courtney Kraus
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Mahesh Maiyani
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jennifer Wolff
- School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Cynthia M Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Berger J. Quelques outils pour mettre en œuvre la déprescription. ACTUALITES PHARMACEUTIQUES 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.actpha.2023.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
|
24
|
Badou JP. Les patients face à la déprescription. ACTUALITES PHARMACEUTIQUES 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.actpha.2023.01.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
|
25
|
Vasilevskis EE, Shah AS, Hollingsworth EK, Shotwell MS, Kripalani S, Mixon AS, Simmons SF. Deprescribing Medications Among Older Adults From End of Hospitalization Through Postacute Care: A Shed-MEDS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183:223-231. [PMID: 36745422 PMCID: PMC9989899 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Deprescribing is a promising approach to addressing the burden of polypharmacy. Few studies have initiated comprehensive deprescribing in the hospital setting among older patients requiring ongoing care in a postacute care (PAC) facility. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a patient-centered deprescribing intervention among hospitalized older adults transitioning or being discharged to a PAC facility. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial of the Shed-MEDS (Best Possible Medication History, Evaluate, Deprescribing Recommendations, and Synthesis) deprescribing intervention was conducted between March 2016 and October 2020. Patients who were admitted to an academic medical center and discharged to 1 of 22 PAC facilities affiliated with the medical center were recruited. Patients who were 50 years or older and had 5 or more prehospital medications were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to the intervention group or control group. Patients who were non-English speaking, were unhoused, were long-stay residents of nursing homes, or had less than 6 months of life expectancy were excluded. An intention-to-treat approach was used. Interventions The intervention group received the Shed-MEDS intervention, which consisted of a pharmacist- or nurse practitioner-led comprehensive medication review, patient or surrogate-approved deprescribing recommendations, and deprescribing actions that were initiated in the hospital and continued throughout the PAC facility stay. The control group received usual care at the hospital and PAC facility. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the total medication count at hospital discharge and PAC facility discharge, with follow-up assessments during the 90-day period after PAC facility discharge. Secondary outcomes included the total number of potentially inappropriate medications at each time point, the Drug Burden Index, and adverse events. Results A total of 372 participants (mean [SD] age, 76.2 [10.7] years; 229 females [62%]) were randomized to the intervention or control groups. Of these participants, 284 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (142 in the intervention group and 142 in the control group). Overall, there was a statistically significant treatment effect, with patients in the intervention group taking a mean of 14% fewer medications at PAC facility discharge (mean ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.93; P < .001) and 15% fewer medications at the 90-day follow-up (mean ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92; P < .001) compared with the control group. The intervention additionally reduced patient exposure to potentially inappropriate medications and Drug Burden Index. Adverse drug event rates were similar between the intervention and control groups (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.52-1.30). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this trial showed that the Shed-MEDS patient-centered deprescribing intervention was safe and effective in reducing the total medication burden at PAC facility discharge and 90 days after discharge. Future studies are needed to examine the effect of this intervention on patient-reported and long-term clinical outcomes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02979353.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard E. Vasilevskis
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Avantika Saraf Shah
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Sunil Kripalani
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Amanda S. Mixon
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Sandra F. Simmons
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Division of Geriatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hanna V, Chahine B, Souheil FA. Attitudes of Lebanese community-dwelling older adults towards deprescribing using the rPATD tool. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2023; 105:104840. [PMID: 36343438 DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the attitude of community-dwelling Lebanese older adults towards deprescribing using the Revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire and to determine patient-related factors that impact their willingness for deprescribing. METHODS A cross-sectional face-to-face survey was conducted in Lebanon over the period extending between October 2021 and March 2022 using the validated Arabic version of the rPATD questionnaire. It included ambulatory older adults who were 65 years of age or older, presenting to the community pharmacy, taking at least one chronic medication, and having intact cognition. KEY FINDINGS Of the 400 patients approached 300 (87%) agreed to participate. The mean age of participants was 65 (range 65-85 years) and 148 (56.3%) were females. The mean number of medications taken per patient was 5.8 ± 2.67 (range 1-18) and polypharmacy was reported among 188 patients (71.8%). Nearly all of study subjects 233 (89.0%) were willing to discontinue one or more of their regular medications if their physician said it was possible. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the appropriateness of medications factor (OR= 3.9, 95% CI 1.308, 12.16, p=0.015) and patients' concern about stopping the medications factor (OR=0.116, 95% CI 0.033, 0.40, p = 0.001) were significantly associated with patients' willingness to deprescribe. CONCLUSION A noteworthy percentage of the Lebanese older outpatients were willing to stop one or more of their regular medications if their doctor recommends so. Patients' belief in appropriateness of medications and concerns about stopping were noted to significantly influence their willingness to deprescribe in this sample population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venise Hanna
- PharmD Program, School of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Beirut 1103, Lebanon
| | - Bahia Chahine
- PharmD Program, School of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Beirut 1103, Lebanon.
| | - Farah Al Souheil
- PharmD Program, School of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Beirut 1103, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Masnoon N, Lo S, Hilmer S. A stewardship program to facilitate anticholinergic and sedative medication deprescribing using the drug burden index in electronic medical records. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 89:687-698. [PMID: 36038522 PMCID: PMC10953400 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The drug burden index (DBI) measures a person's total exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medications, which are commonly associated with harm. Through incorporating the DBI in electronic medical records (eMR) and implementing a DBI stewardship program, we aimed to determine (i) uptake of the steward's recommendations to deprescribe anticholinergic and/or sedative drugs by the medical team and (ii) whether accepted recommendations were actioned in hospital or recommended for follow-up by the General Practitioner post-discharge. METHODS A single-arm, non-randomised feasibility study was performed at an Australian tertiary referral metropolitan hospital. The stewardship pharmacist reviewed eMRs of patients aged ≥75 years with DBI scores > 0, during admission. The steward identified and discussed potential opportunities to deprescribe anticholinergic and/or sedative medications with the medical registrars. RESULTS Amongst 256 patients reviewed, the steward made 170 recommendations for 117 patients. Registrars agreed with 141 recommendations (82.9%) for 95 patients (81.2%), and actioned 115 deprescribing recommendations for 80 patients, most commonly for antidepressants and opioids. The 115 actioned recommendations resulted in 125 changes, with 44 changes to the inpatient drug chart and 81 additional changes recommended post-discharge in the discharge summary. CONCLUSION Opportunities exist for deprescribing anticholinergic and sedative medications in older inpatients and a DBI stewardship program may help implement these. It is important to capture different outcomes of deprescribing interventions, including in-hospital medication changes, recommendations in the Discharge Summary, sustainability of deprescribing and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nashwa Masnoon
- Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Sarita Lo
- Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Sarah Hilmer
- Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged CareRoyal North Shore HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Akande-Sholabi W, Ajilore CO, Ilori T. Evaluation of physicians' knowledge of deprescribing, deprescribing tools and assessment of factors affecting deprescribing process. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:31. [PMID: 36698057 PMCID: PMC9875427 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-01990-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Polypharmacy is a common global health concern in the older population. Deprescribing has been acknowledged as an important aspect of medication use review that helps to reduce polypharmacy, inappropriate medication uses and medication adverse events, thus ensuring medication optimization and improving health-related quality of life. As physicians are primarily responsible for prescribing and monitoring of drug therapy, their perception of deprescribing and knowledge of available deprescribing tools is highly important. This study aimed to explore physicians' knowledge of deprescribing, deprescribing tools and factors that may affect the deprescribing process. METHODS This was a cross-sectional survey carried out among 70 physicians in selected units of a teaching hospital in Nigeria between May and June 2022. Social-demographic information, knowledge of deprescribing and deprescribing tools were obtained using a self-administered, semi-structured questionnaire, while barriers and enablers of medication deprescribing were assessed with modified Revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) Questionnaire. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were carried out using SPSS and α was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS Most of the physicians (56; 80.0%) were aware of the term "deprescribing" and had good knowledge (53; 75.7%) of the steps to deprescribing. However, (16; 22.9%) respondents knew of the deprescribing tools, of this, (5; 31.3%) were aware of Beers criteria and STOPP/START criteria. Awareness of the term "deprescribing" was significantly associated with knowledge of deprescribing steps (p = 0.012), while knowledge of deprescribing tools was significantly associated with; awareness of the term "deprescribing" (p = 0.029), and daily encounters with older multimorbid patients (p = 0.031). Very important factor affecting physicians deprescribing decisions include benefit of the medication. The most common barrier is lack of information for a full clinical picture of the patient. CONCLUSION The physicians had good knowledge of the term "deprescribing" and the steps to deprescribing. Specific measures to target the barriers faced by the physicians in deprescribing medications and policies to implement physicians use of existing guidelines to facilitate their deprescribing decisions are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wuraola Akande-Sholabi
- grid.9582.60000 0004 1794 5983Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Comfort O. Ajilore
- grid.9582.60000 0004 1794 5983Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Temitope Ilori
- grid.9582.60000 0004 1794 5983Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria ,grid.412438.80000 0004 1764 5403Department of Family Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Reeve E, Bayliss EA, Shetterly S, Maiyani M, Gleason KS, Norton JD, Sheehan OC, Green AR, Maciejewski ML, Drace M, Sawyer J, Boyd CM. Willingness of older people living with dementia and mild cognitive impairment and their caregivers to have medications deprescribed. Age Ageing 2023; 52:afac335. [PMID: 36702513 PMCID: PMC9879708 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND people living with cognitive impairment commonly take multiple medications including potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), which puts them at risk of medication related harms. AIMS to explore willingness to have a medication deprescribed of older people living with cognitive impairment (dementia or mild cognitive impairment) and multiple chronic conditions and assess the relationship between willingness, patient characteristics and belief about medications. METHODS cross-sectional study using results from the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing questionnaire (rPATDcog) collected as baseline data in the OPTIMIZE study, a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial educating patients and clinicians about deprescribing. Eligible participants were 65+, diagnosed with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, and prescribed at least five-long-term medications. RESULTS the questionnaire was mailed to 1,409 intervention patients and 553 (39%) were returned and included in analysis. Participants had a mean age of 80.1 (SD 7.4) and 52.4% were female. About 78.5% (431/549) of participants said that they would be willing to have one of their medications stopped if their doctor said it was possible. Willingness to deprescribe was negatively associated with getting stressed when changes are made and with previously having a bad experience with stopping a medication (P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSION most older people living with cognitive impairment are willing to deprescribe. Addressing previous bad experiences with stopping a medication and stress when changes are made to medications may be key points to discuss during deprescribing conversations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Reeve
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A Bayliss
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Susan Shetterly
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Mahesh Maiyani
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kathy S Gleason
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jonathan D Norton
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Orla C Sheehan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, RCSI Hospitals Group, Connolly Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ariel R Green
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Melanie Drace
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jennifer Sawyer
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Cynthia M Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
De Lima B, Rowan E, Motulsky A, Morgan E. Primary Care Provider-Led Approach to Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Older Adults. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2023. [DOI: 10.1177/23337214231158474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use increases the risk of adverse drug events in older adults and deprescribing has been shown to reduce these outcomes. This study assessed the feasibility of a provider-driven approach to deprescribe PIMs in an internal medicine clinic. Providers received education on the risks of select medications and benefits of deprescribing at an all-staff meeting in April 2021. Providers were asked to choose a deprescribing intervention. Chart reviews were completed at 3 and 6 months to evaluate changes in medication. Tests of binomial proportions were used to determine any significant differences. Thirty-two providers participated and interventions resulted in a 41.6% reduction in the reviewed PIMs (tapered or discontinued). A provider-driven approach may be a feasible and effective method of deprescribing PIMs in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Emily Morgan
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Goldwater D, Wenger NK. Patient-centered care in geriatric cardiology. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2023; 33:13-20. [PMID: 34758389 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Geriatric cardiology involves providing cardiovascular care to older adults in relation to aging. Although cardiovascular diseases are the most common diseases faced by older adults, they often co-occur with numerous aging-related challenges, such as multimorbidity, frailty, polypharmacy, falls, functional and cognitive impairment, which present challenges to implementing standard disease-based treatment strategies. Faced with these complexities, patient-centered care in geriatric cardiology strives to direct all management toward the achievement of an individual's prioritized health and life goals by employing shared decision-making to align treatment with goals, utilizing stated goals to navigate situations of treatment uncertainty, and pro-actively mitigating aging-related risks. This fundamental change in cardiovascular medicine from disease-centered management to patient-centered goal-directed care is necessary to facilitate wellness, independence, and favorable quality of life outcomes in the older adult population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nanette K Wenger
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gray SL, Fornaro R, Turner J, Boudreau DM, Wellman R, Tannenbaum C, Marcum ZA, Balderson B, Cook A, Jacobsen AL, Phelan EA. Provider knowledge, beliefs, and self‐efficacy to deprescribe opioids and sedative‐hypnotics. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 71:1580-1586. [PMID: 36546768 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While many studies have assessed and measured patient attitudes toward deprescribing, less quantitative research has addressed the provider perspective. We thus sought to describe provider knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy to deprescribe, with a focus on opioids and sedative-hypnotics. METHODS An electronic anonymous survey was distributed to primary care providers at Kaiser Permanente Washington. Two reminder emails were sent. The survey included 10 questions on general deprescribing, and six questions each specific to opioid and sedative-hypnotic deprescribing. Knowledge questions used a multiple-choice response option format. Questions addressing beliefs and self-efficacy (i.e., confidence) used a 0-10 Likert scale. Scales were dichotomized at ≥7 to define agreement (belief questions) or confidence (self-efficacy questions). We calculated descriptive statistics to summarize the responses. RESULTS Of 370 eligible primary care providers, 95 (26%) completed the survey. For general deprescribing questions, a majority believed that lack of patient willingness, withdrawal symptoms and fear of symptom return, and time constraints impeded deprescribing. Approximately half chose the correct answers about opioid deprescribing, 21% were confident that they could alleviate patient concerns about opioid tapering, and 32% were confident managing chronic non-cancer pain without opioids. For sedative-hypnotics, 64%-87% of respondents correctly answered questions about risks and the relative effectiveness of alternatives, but only one-third correctly answered a question about sedative-hypnotic tapering. Roughly half were confident in their ability to successfully engage patients in sedative deprescribing conversations and select alternatives. Only 54% and 34% were confident in writing a tapering protocol for opioids and sedative-hypnotics, respectively. CONCLUSION Results suggest that raising provider awareness of patient willingness to deprescribe, addressing knowledge gaps, and increasing self-efficacy for deprescribing are important targets for improving deprescribing. Support for writing tapering protocols and prescribing evidence-based drug and non-drug alternatives may be important to improve care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelly L. Gray
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
| | - Rachyl Fornaro
- Department of Pharmacy UW Medicine Valley Medical Center Renton Washington USA
| | - Justin Turner
- Centre de Recherche, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Québec Faculté de pharmacie Université de Montréal Montréal Canada
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - Denise M. Boudreau
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington Seattle Washington USA
| | - Robert Wellman
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington Seattle Washington USA
| | - Cara Tannenbaum
- Centre de Recherche, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Québec Faculté de pharmacie Université de Montréal Montréal Canada
| | - Zachary A. Marcum
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
| | - Benjamin Balderson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington Seattle Washington USA
| | - Andrea Cook
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington Seattle Washington USA
| | | | - Elizabeth A. Phelan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, School of Medicine, and Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Schaefer JK, Barnes GD, Sussman JB, Saini SD, Caverly TJ, Read S, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Kurlander JE. A survey of internists' recommendations for aspirin in older adults and barriers to evidence-based use. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2022; 54:639-646. [PMID: 35699872 PMCID: PMC11218794 DOI: 10.1007/s11239-022-02669-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Recent trials suggest that aspirin for primary prevention may do more harm than good for some, including adults over 70 years of age. We sought to assess how primary care providers (PCPs) use aspirin for the primary prevention in older patients and to identify barriers to use according to recent guidelines, which recommend against routine use in patients over age 70. We surveyed PCPs about whether they would recommend aspirin in clinical vignettes of a 75-year-old patient with a 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk of 25%. We also queried perceived difficulty following guideline recommendations, as well as perceived barriers and facilitators. We obtained responses from 372 PCPs (47.9% response). In the patient vignette, 45.4% of clinicians recommended aspirin use, which did not vary by whether the patient was using aspirin initially (p = 0.21); 41.7% believed aspirin was beneficial. Perceived barriers to guideline-based aspirin use included concern about patients being upset (41.6%), possible malpractice claims (25.0%), and not having a strategy for discussing aspirin use (24.5%). The estimated adjusted probability of rating the guideline as "hard to follow" was higher in clinicians who believed aspirin was beneficial (29.4% vs. 8.0%; p < 0.001) and who worried the patient would be upset if told to stop aspirin (26.7% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.001). Internists vary considerably in their recommendations for aspirin use for primary prevention in older patients. A high proportion of PCPs continue to believe aspirin is beneficial in this setting. These results can inform de-implementation efforts to optimize evidence-based aspirin use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan K Schaefer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, C366 Med Inn Building, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Geoffrey D Barnes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeremy B Sussman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sameer D Saini
- Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tanner J Caverly
- Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Susan Read
- Research Center, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jacob E Kurlander
- Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Beliefs and attitudes of residents, family members and healthcare professionals regarding deprescribing in long-term care: a qualitative study. Int J Clin Pharm 2022; 44:1370-1379. [PMID: 36201111 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01419-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polypharmacy is prevalent among long-term care (LTC) residents and can cause significant morbidity. In 2018, we concluded a deprescribing pilot study that reduced potentially inappropriate medication use among LTC residents. AIM We sought to understand the experience and views of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, LTC residents and family members who participated in the pilot study. METHOD Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with residents and families, a physician, pharmacist and pharmacy student, and licensed-practical nurses. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. RESULTS Interviews with 13 participants yielded themes in 3 categories: (1) views about medication use in LTC and willingness to engage in deprescribing, (2) perceived barriers and enablers for deprescribing, and (3) impact of participating in deprescribing study. Participants were willing to engage in deprescribing; residents were motivated by physician suggestions, and family members prioritized quality of life in decision-making and wanted to be part of the decision-making process. Solutions to overcome barriers included assigning responsibility to identify deprescribing opportunities to pharmacists, scheduling rounds to enable face-to-face team discussions, and consulting families to provide missing medical history to inform deprescribing decisions. Participating in a deprescribing intervention resulted in improved healthcare professional (HCP) confidence and interprofessional collaboration, and caused continued practice change after the study. CONCLUSION Residents, families, and HCPs are concerned about problems associated with polypharmacy in LTC and are willing to consider deprescribing. Barriers to deprescribing in LTC exist but are not insurmountable. Results provide valuable insight into strategies to optimize deprescribing interventions within LTC.
Collapse
|
35
|
Green AR, Aschmann H, Boyd CM, Schoenborn N. Association between willingness to deprescribe and health outcome priorities among U.S. older adults: Results of a national survey. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:2895-2904. [PMID: 35661991 PMCID: PMC9588518 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is not known whether older adults' willingness to deprescribe is associated with their health outcome priorities related to medications. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted from March-April 2020 using a nationally representative online panel. The survey presented two vignettes: (1) a preventive medicine; and (2) a symptom-relief medicine. Participants were asked whether they would be willing to stop each medicine if their doctor recommended it, and to rate their level of agreement with two health outcome priorities statements: "I am willing to accept the risk of future side effects … to feel better now," and "I would prefer to take fewer medicines, even if … I may not live as long or may have bothersome symptoms sometimes." Ordinal logistic regression was used to examine associations between willingness to stop each medicine, baseline characteristics and health outcome priorities. RESULTS Of 1193 panel members ≥65 years invited to participate, 835 (70%) completed the survey. Mean (SD) age was 73 years; 496 (59%) had taken a statin and 124 (15%) a prescription sedative-hypnotic. 507 (61%) were willing to stop preventive medicines; 276 (33%) were maybe willing. 419 (50%) were willing to stop symptom-relief medicines; 380 (46%) were maybe willing. Prioritizing fewer medicines was associated with higher odds of being willing to stop symptom-relief medicines (aOR 1.43 [95% CI 1.02-2.00]) and preventive medicines (aOR 1.52 [95% CI 1.05-2.18]). Prioritizing now over future was associated with lower odds of being willing to stop symptom-relief medicines (aOR 0.62 [95% CI 0.39-1.00]). Current/prior use of statins was associated with lower willingness to stop preventive medicines (aOR 0.66 [95% CI 0.48-0.91]). CONCLUSIONS Older adults' health outcome priorities related to medication use are associated with their willingness to consider deprescribing. Future research should determine how best to elicit patients' health outcome priorities to facilitate goal-concordant decisions about medication use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel R. Green
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and GerontologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Hélène Aschmann
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA,Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention InstituteUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Cynthia M. Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and GerontologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA,Department of Health Policy and ManagementJohns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Nancy Schoenborn
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and GerontologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Morley CP, Schad LA, Cerio H, McNamara SE, Wojtowycz MA, Smith NH, Noviasky JA, Ulen KR, Townsend K, Amidon J, Brangman SA. Longitudinal Evaluation of a Deprescribing Protocol in Skilled Nursing Facilities. Sr Care Pharm 2022; 37:523-531. [DOI: 10.4140/tcp.n.2022.523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether a deprescribing effort reduced several key classes of medications, and the overall number of medication classes per patient, among long-term residents of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Design: Retrospective, longitudinal
pre/post evaluation. Data from before and during the implementation of the deprescribing effort (2017 through 2019) were compared with data from the post-intervention year (2020). Setting and Patients: Long-term resident data reported through annual comprehensive reviews
conducted at two SNFs located in central New York State between 2017 and 2020 (N = 12,144). Interventions: Multifaceted, interdisciplinary deprescribing effort to reduce medications in SNF residence including clinician education, guideline development, and individual chart
reviews began in 2019. Results: The mean number of medications prescribed per resident was lower at both facilities after the intervention (mean = 1.74 at both facilities) versus preintervention (1.90 at Facility 1, 1.86 at Facility 2). Significant decreases were observed
in the usage rates for diuretics (-4.2%; P = 0.001), opioids (-3.8%; P = 0.001), and antipsychotics (-2.4%; P = 0.010). The raw antidepressant usage rate increased by 1.5% after the intervention but the change was not significant. Effects were robust to covariate adjustment.
Conclusion: A combined, comprehensive approach to deprescribing was associated with a reduction in the overall number of medication classes per resident and in several key classes of medications. Additional research with more data and covariate control is in progress for verification
of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P. Morley
- 1State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Syracuse, New York
| | - Laura A. Schad
- 1State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Syracuse, New York
| | - Halle Cerio
- 1State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Syracuse, New York
| | - Sarah E. McNamara
- 2State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Department of Geriatrics, Syracuse, New York
| | - Martha A. Wojtowycz
- 1State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Syracuse, New York
| | | | - John A. Noviasky
- 4State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Department of Pharmacy, Syracuse, New York
| | - Kelly R. Ulen
- 4State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Department of Pharmacy, Syracuse, New York
| | | | | | - Sharon A. Brangman
- 2State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Department of Geriatrics, Syracuse, New York
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Nusair MB, Khasawneh R, Al-azzam S, Al-Shuqairat T, Khair ZM, Arabyat R. Attitudes towards adherence and deprescribing among polypharmacy patients: a cross-sectional study. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/jphsr/rmac028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Deprescribing is the process of optimization of medication regimens through cessation of potentially inappropriate or unnecessary medications or adjustment of doses with the goal of managing polypharmacy and improving outcomes. Deprescribing potentially improves adherence by reducing polypharmacy. This study aimed to assess polypharmacy patients’ adherence attitudes and their attitudes towards deprescribing.
Methods
A cross-sectional study that targeted polypharmacy patients at outpatient clinics at King Abdullah University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were (1) patients ≥18 years old, (2) patients taking five or more medications, and (3) patients who do not require a caregiver or assistance at home. We excluded patients that showed any signs of moderate or severe cognitive impairment. Patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were interviewed by a clinical pharmacist and completed two survey instruments: revised Patients’ Attitudes Toward Deprescribing (rPATD) and Adherence Attitude Inventory (AAI).
Key findings
In total, 501 patients took part in this study. Over half of the participants were not satisfied with their current medicines and over 70% of them perceived that their current medications are a burden to them and would like their prescribers to initiate deprescribing. The majority of the participants have low to medium adherence attitudes primarily due to ineffective patient–provider communication. Logistic regression analysis revealed that self-efficacy, commitment to adherence, education and age were significantly associated with participants’ willingness to stop one or more of their medications.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that polypharmacy patients have negative attitudes towards their medication therapy and favour deprescribing. These reported attitudes had been associated with negative adherence attitudes. Study findings offer schematic direction for future investigations of the role of adherence on key health-related outcomes in patients on polypharmacy. Furthermore, research is warranted to investigate the impact of deprescribing on polypharmacy patients’ medication adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad B Nusair
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University , Irbid , Jordan
- Department of Sociobehavioral and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University , Fort Lauderdale, FL , USA
| | - Rawand Khasawneh
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology , Irbid , Jordan
| | - Sayer Al-azzam
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology , Irbid , Jordan
| | - Tala Al-Shuqairat
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology , Irbid , Jordan
| | - Zaid M Khair
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University , Irbid , Jordan
| | - Rasha Arabyat
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University , Irbid , Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lee HG, Kwon S, Jang BH, Jeon JP, Lee YS, Jung WS, Moon SK, Cho KH. A Study on the Perceptions of Korean Older Adult Patients and Caregivers about Polypharmacy and Deprescribing. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:11446. [PMID: 36141719 PMCID: PMC9517474 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Polypharmacy is continuously increasing among older adults. The resultant potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) can be harmful to patient health. Deprescribing refers to stopping or reducing PIMs. In this study, the current status of polypharmacy and willingness of older adults to deprescribe were investigated among patients and caregivers who are not associated with one another. The survey used the Korean translated version of the revised Patients' Attitude Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) Scale. Data were collected through an online survey of 500 participants (250 patients and caregivers each) in this study. The following results were found for patients and caregivers, respectively: 74.8% and 63.6% felt their number of medications was high, 64.4% and 55.6% desired to reduce their medications, 70.4% and 60.8% were concerned about medication discontinuation, 63.2% and 61.2% had a good understanding of their medications, 77.6% and 76.4% were willing to be well informed, and 79.6% and 72% wanted to reduce the number of medications if medically feasible. Patients and caregivers commonly agreed to the burden of the number of medications they were taking, and were willing to reduce the number of medications if the doctor said it was possible. Doctors should consider this information during the deprescribing process, and promote deprescription while involving patients and caregivers in the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Gyul Lee
- Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology and Neurology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
| | - Seungwon Kwon
- Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology and Neurology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
| | - Bo-Hyoung Jang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
| | - Jin Pyeong Jeon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon 24253, Korea
| | - Ye-Seul Lee
- Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul 06110, Korea
| | - Woo-Sang Jung
- Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology and Neurology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
| | - Sang-Kwan Moon
- Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology and Neurology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
| | - Ki-Ho Cho
- Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology and Neurology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pereira A, Ribeiro O, Veríssimo M. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire to Portuguese: Older adults version. Res Social Adm Pharm 2022; 19:123-132. [PMID: 36115808 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deprescribing is a patient-centered approach to managing inappropriate polypharmacy that faces several barriers, including patients' attitudes and beliefs about medications that need to be considered. For this purpose, the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire is a helpful instrument, but until now, there is no Portuguese version. OBJECTIVES To translate and validate the rPATD questionnaire (older adults version) to Portuguese. METHODS The rPATD questionnaire was translated and cross-culturally adapted using forward-backward translation and pre-testing. A cross-sectional study with 192 older adults aged ≥65 years taking at least 1 regular medication was conducted for validity assessment. Participants were recruited by convenience sampling in 3 Portuguese outpatient rehabilitation medicine clinics. Psychometric properties were evaluated through face and content validity; construct validity, by assessing structural validity through exploratory factor analysis, hypotheses testing, including concurrent validity and cross cultural validity; reliability with internal consistency; and item-total correlation. Floor and ceiling effects were examined. RESULTS The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a 4-factor structure that explains 51.08% of the total variance, as in the original rPATD. These 4 factors are related to the level of involvement in medication management, beliefs in the appropriateness of medication, perceived burden of medication, and concerns about stopping medications. Factor loadings ranged from 0.226 to 0.800; 2 items scored <0.3, and no cross-loading was found. The exclusion of the 2 items loading <0.3 in the EFA showed no significant improvement in factor loading or internal consistency, so the item structure was maintained. In hypothesis testing, 78% of the correlations were correctly predicted. The 4 factors internal consistency was generally acceptable, with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.638 to 0.830. The item-total correlation ranged between 0.223 and 0.7. CONCLUSION The Portuguese rPATD questionnaire for older adults presents globally good or acceptable psychometric properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anabela Pereira
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), Department of Education and Psychology of the University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal; Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Oscar Ribeiro
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), Department of Education and Psychology of the University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Manuel Veríssimo
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Roux B, Rakheja B, Sirois C, Niquille A, Pétein C, Ouellet N, Spinewine A, Sibille FX, Laroche ML. Attitudes and beliefs of older adults and caregivers towards deprescribing in French-speaking countries: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 78:1633-1646. [PMID: 35896803 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03368-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Successful deprescribing requires understanding the attitudes of older adults and caregivers towards this process. This study aimed to capture these attitudes in four French-speaking countries and to investigate associated factors. METHODS A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted by administrating the French version of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in Belgium, Canada, France, and Switzerland. Community-dwelling or nursing home older adults ≥ 65 years taking ≥ 1 prescribed medications and caregivers of older adults with similar characteristics were included. Multivariate logistic regressions were carried out to examine factors associated with willingness to deprescribe. RESULTS A total of 367 older adults (79.3 ± 8.7 years, 63% community-dwelling, 54% ≥ 5 medications) and 255 unrelated caregivers (64.4 ± 12.6 years) of care recipients (83.4 ± 7.9 years, 52% community-dwelling, 69% ≥ 5 medications) answered the questionnaire. Among them, 87.5% older adults and 75.6% caregivers would be willing to stop medications if the physician said it was possible. Reluctance to stop a medication taken for a long time was expressed by 46% of both older adults and caregivers. A low score for the factor "concerns about stopping" (older adults: aOR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07-0.59), and a high score for the factor "involvement" (older adults: aOR: 2.66; 95% CI: 1.01-7.07; caregivers: aOR: 11.28; 95% CI: 1.48-85.91) were associated with willingness to deprescribe. CONCLUSIONS A significant proportion of older adults and caregivers of French-speaking countries are open to deprescribing. Despite this apparent willingness, deprescribing conversations in clinical practice remains marginal, emphasizing the importance of optimizing the integration of existing tools such as rPATD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Roux
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology and Centre of Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | | | - Caroline Sirois
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.,Centre of Excellence On Aging of Quebec, Quebec, Canada.,Centre de recherche sur les soins et les Services de premieres lignes de l'Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anne Niquille
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Community Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Catherine Pétein
- Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nicole Ouellet
- Department of Health, University of Quebec at Rimouski, Rimouski, Canada
| | - Anne Spinewine
- Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Pharmacy Department, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - François-Xavier Sibille
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.,Institute of Health and Society, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marie-Laure Laroche
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology and Centre of Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France. .,Unité VIESANTE - UR 24134 (Vieillissement, Fragilité, Prévention, e-Santé), IFR OMEGA HEALTH, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Drug Survival, Safety, and Effectiveness of Biologics in Older Patients with Psoriasis: A Comparison with Younger Patients-A BioCAPTURE Registry Study. Drugs Aging 2022; 39:715-727. [PMID: 35859228 PMCID: PMC9300332 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-022-00961-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psoriasis is a common inflammatory disease in any age group, but also in older patients (≥ 65 years of age). Since older patients are often excluded from clinical trials, limited data specifically on this growing population are available, e.g. regarding the safety and performance of biological treatment. AIMS We aimed to give insight into this specific population by comparing the drug survival and safety of biologics in older patients with that in younger patients. METHODS In this real-world observational study, data from 3 academic and 15 non-academic centers in The Netherlands were extracted from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry. Biologics included in this study were tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors. Patients were divided into two age groups: ≥ 65 years and < 65 years. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to measure comorbid disease status, and all adverse events (AEs) that led to treatment discontinuation were classified according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification. All AEs that led to treatment discontinuation were studied to check whether they could be classified as serious AEs (SAEs). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall 5-year drug survival and split according to reasons of discontinuation (ineffectiveness or AEs) were constructed. Cox regression models were used to correct for possible confounders and to investigate associations with drug survival in both age groups separately. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores during the first 2 years of treatment and at the time of treatment discontinuation were assessed and compared between age groups. RESULTS A total of 890 patients were included, of whom 102 (11.4%) were aged ≥ 65 years. Body mass index, sex, and distribution of biologic classes (e.g. TNFα, IL12/23) were not significantly different between the two age groups. A significantly higher CCI score was found in older patients, indicative of more comorbidity (p < 0.001). The 5-year ineffectiveness-related drug survival was lower for older patients (44.5% vs. 60.5%; p = 0.006), and the 5-year overall (≥ 65 years: 32.4% vs. < 65 years: 42.1%; p = 0.144) and AE-related (≥ 65 years: 82.1% vs. < 65 years: 79.5%; p = 0.913) drug survival was comparable between age groups. Of all AEs (n = 155) that led to discontinuation, 16 (10.3%) were reported as SAEs but these only occurred in younger patients. After correcting for confounders, the same trends were observed in the drug survival outcomes. Linear regression analyses on PASI scores showed no statistical differences at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment between age groups. CONCLUSIONS This study in a substantial, well-defined, prospective cohort provides further support that the use of biologics in older patients seems well-tolerated and effective. Biologic discontinuation due to AEs did not occur more frequently in older patients. Older patients discontinued biologic treatment more often due to ineffectiveness, although no clear difference in PASI scores was observed. More real-world studies on physician- and patient-related factors in older patients are warranted.
Collapse
|
42
|
Seewoodharry M, Khunti K, Davies MJ, Gillies C, Seidu S. Attitudes of older adults and their carers towards de-prescribing: A systematic review. Diabet Med 2022; 39:e14801. [PMID: 35118700 DOI: 10.1111/dme.14801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this systematic review is to explore the attitudes of older adults (≥65 years old) and their carers towards de-prescribing. METHODS We identified relevant studies from three databases; MEDLINE, CINAHL and Web of Science. Two reviewers (MS, SS) independently extracted data from each selected study using a standardised self-developed data extraction form. Main findings of the studies were summarised descriptively. RESULTS A total of 35 studies were included in the review. Of them, 19 were questionnaire studies, 11 semi-structured interviews, 4 focus groups and 1 study used the nominal group technique approach. Most older adults and their carers were willing to have medication de-prescribed if told to do so by a healthcare professional (HCP). Other factors that increased willingness to de-prescribing included; trust in the HCP, side effects and inconvenience from medications as well as the prospect of follow-up and monitoring during de-prescribing. In contrast, perceived effectiveness, unawareness of lack of benefit, negative expectations of ageing and fear were factors preventing de-prescribing. CONCLUSION De-prescribing is an important concept in older people given the harm associated with polypharmacy in this age group. Overall, older adults and their carers are willing to have medication de-prescribed if facilitated by their HCP. However, there remain a few barriers to de-prescribing which may need to be addressed in certain patients, through discussions between older adults/their carers and a HCP, to allow de-prescribing to be more effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansha Seewoodharry
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Melanie J Davies
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Gillies
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel Seidu
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tan J, Wang M, Pei X, Sun Q, Lu C, Wang Y, Zhang L, Wu C. Continue or not to continue? Attitudes towards deprescribing among community-dwelling older adults in China. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:492. [PMID: 35676628 PMCID: PMC9175377 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03184-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inappropriate prescribing of medications and polypharmacy among older adults are associated with a wide range of adverse outcomes. It is critical to understand the attitudes towards deprescribing—reducing the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs)—among this vulnerable group. Such information is particularly lacking in low - and middle-income countries. Methods In this study, we examined Chinese community-dwelling older adults’ attitudes to deprescribing as well as individual-level correlates. Through the community-based health examination platform, we performed a cross-sectional study by personally interviews using the revised Patients’ Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire (version for older adults) in two communities located in Suzhou, China. We recruited participants who were at least 65 years and had at least one chronic condition and one prescribed medication. Results We included 1,897 participants in the present study; the mean age was 73.8 years (SD = 6.2 years) and 1,023 (53.9%) were women. Most of older adults had one chronic disease (n = 1,364 [71.9%]) and took 1–2 regular drugs (n = 1,483 [78.2%]). Half of the participants (n = 947, 50%) indicated that they would be willing to stop taking one or more of their medicines if their doctor said it was possible, and 924 (48.7%) older adults wanted to cut down on the number of medications they were taking. We did not find individual level characteristics to be correlated to attitudes to deprescribing. Conclusions The proportions of participants’ willingness to deprescribing were much lower than what prior investigations among western populations reported. It is important to identify the factors that influence deprescribing and develop a patient-centered and practical deprescribing guideline that is suitable for Chinese older adults. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03184-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Tan
- Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Academic Building 3038 No. 8 Duke Avenue, 215316, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
| | - MinHong Wang
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, 215002, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - XiaoRui Pei
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, 215002, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Quan Sun
- Gusu District Wumenqiao street Nanhuan community Health Service Center, 215008, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - ChongJun Lu
- Gusu District Pingjiang street Loujiang community Health Service Center, 215008, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Academic Building 3038 No. 8 Duke Avenue, 215316, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, 215002, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
| | - Chenkai Wu
- Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Academic Building 3038 No. 8 Duke Avenue, 215316, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bayliss EA, Shetterly SM, Drace ML, Norton JD, Maiyani M, Gleason KS, Sawyer JK, Weffald LA, Green AR, Reeve E, Maciejewski ML, Sheehan OC, Wolff JL, Kraus C, Boyd CM. Deprescribing Education vs Usual Care for Patients With Cognitive Impairment and Primary Care Clinicians: The OPTIMIZE Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:534-542. [PMID: 35343999 PMCID: PMC8961395 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Individuals with dementia or mild cognitive impairment frequently have multiple chronic conditions (defined as ≥2 chronic medical conditions) and take multiple medications, increasing their risk for adverse outcomes. Deprescribing (reducing or stopping medications for which potential harms outweigh potential benefits) may decrease their risk of adverse outcomes. Objective To examine the effectiveness of increasing patient and clinician awareness about the potential to deprescribe unnecessary or risky medications among patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment. Design, Setting, and Participants This pragmatic, patient-centered, 12-month cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020, at 18 primary care clinics in a not-for-profit integrated health care delivery system. The study included 3012 adults aged 65 years or older with dementia or mild cognitive impairment who had 1 or more additional chronic medical conditions and were taking 5 or more long-term medications. Interventions An educational brochure and a questionnaire on attitudes toward deprescribing were mailed to patients prior to a primary care visit, clinicians were notified about the mailing, and deprescribing tip sheets were distributed to clinicians at monthly clinic meetings. Main Outcomes and Measures The number of prescribed long-term medications and the percentage of individuals prescribed 1 or more potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results This study comprised 1433 individuals (806 women [56.2%]; mean [SD] age, 80.1 [7.2] years) in 9 intervention clinics and 1579 individuals (874 women [55.4%]; mean [SD] age, 79.9 [7.5] years) in 9 control clinics who met the eligibility criteria. At baseline, both groups were prescribed a similar mean (SD) number of long-term medications (7.0 [2.1] in the intervention group and 7.0 [2.2] in the control group), and a similar proportion of individuals in both groups were taking 1 or more PIMs (437 of 1433 individuals [30.5%] in the intervention group and 467 of 1579 individuals [29.6%] in the control group). At 6 months, the adjusted mean number of long-term medications was similar in the intervention and control groups (6.4 [95% CI, 6.3-6.5] vs 6.5 [95% CI, 6.4-6.6]; P = .14). The estimated percentages of patients in the intervention and control groups taking 1 or more PIMs were similar (17.8% [95% CI, 15.4%-20.5%] vs 20.9% [95% CI, 18.4%-23.6%]; P = .08). In preplanned subgroup analyses, adjusted differences between the intervention and control groups were -0.16 (95% CI, -0.34 to 0.01) for individuals prescribed 7 or more long-term medications at baseline (n = 1434) and -0.03 (95% CI, -0.20 to 0.13) for those prescribed 5 to 6 medications (n = 1578) (P = .28 for interaction; P = .19 for subgroup interaction for PIMs). Conclusions and Relevance This large-scale educational deprescribing intervention for older adults with cognitive impairment taking 5 or more long-term medications and their primary care clinicians demonstrated small effect sizes and did not significantly reduce the number of long-term medications and PIMs. Such interventions should target older adults taking relatively more medications. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03984396.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A. Bayliss
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | | | - Melanie L. Drace
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Jonathan D. Norton
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mahesh Maiyani
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Kathy S. Gleason
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | | | - Linda A. Weffald
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Ariel R. Green
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Emily Reeve
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matthew L. Maciejewski
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Orla C. Sheehan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer L Wolff
- School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Courtney Kraus
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Cynthia M. Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bawazeer G, Alsaad S, Almalag H, Alqahtani A, Altulaihi N, Alodhayani A, AlHossan A, Sales I. Impact of Specialized Clinics on Medications Deprescribing in Older Adults: A Pilot Study in Ambulatory Care Clinics in a Teaching Hospital. Saudi Pharm J 2022; 30:1027-1035. [PMID: 35903532 PMCID: PMC9315319 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
|
46
|
Peat G, Fylan B, Marques I, Raynor DK, Breen L, Olaniyan J, Alldred DP. Barriers and facilitators of successful deprescribing as described by older patients living with frailty, their informal carers and clinicians: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e054279. [PMID: 35351709 PMCID: PMC8961139 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the barriers/facilitators to deprescribing in primary care in England from the perspectives of clinicians, patients living with frailty who reside at home, and their informal carers, drawing on the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify behavioural components associated with barriers/facilitators of the process. DESIGN Exploratory qualitative study. SETTING General practice (primary care) in England. PARTICIPANTS 9 patients aged 65+ living with frailty who attended a consultation to reduce or stop a medicine/s. 3 informal carers of patients living with frailty. 14 primary care clinicians including general practitioners, practice pharmacists and advanced nurse practitioners. METHODS Qualitative semistructured interviews took place with patients living with frailty, their informal carers and clinicians. Patients (n=9) and informal carers (n=3) were interviewed two times: immediately after deprescribing and 5/6 weeks later. Clinicians (n=14) were interviewed once. In total, 38 interviews were undertaken. Framework analysis was applied to manage and analyse the data. RESULTS 6 themes associated with facilitators and barriers to deprescribing were generated, respectively, with each supported by between two and three subthemes. Identified facilitators of deprescribing with patients living with frailty included shared decision-making, gradual introduction of the topic, clear communication of the topic to the patient and multidisciplinary working. Identified barriers of deprescribing included consultation constraints, patients' fear of negative consequences and inaccessible terminology and information. CONCLUSIONS This paper offers timely insight into the barriers and facilitators to deprescribing for patients living with frailty within the context of primary care in England. As deprescribing continues to grow in national and international significance, it is important that future deprescribing interventions acknowledge the current barriers and facilitators and their associated behavioural components experienced by clinicians, patients living with frailty and their informal carers to improve the safety and effectiveness of the process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Peat
- School of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
- Yorkshire & Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, NIHR, Bradford, England
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Beth Fylan
- Yorkshire & Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, NIHR, Bradford, England
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Iuri Marques
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | | | - Liz Breen
- Yorkshire & Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, NIHR, Bradford, England
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Janice Olaniyan
- School of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
- Yorkshire & Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, NIHR, Bradford, England
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - David Phillip Alldred
- Yorkshire & Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, NIHR, Bradford, England
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ramsdale E, Mohamed M, Yu V, Otto E, Juba K, Awad H, Moorthi K, Plumb S, Patil A, Vogelzang N, Dib E, Mohile S. Polypharmacy, Potentially Inappropriate Medications, and Drug-Drug Interactions in Vulnerable Older Adults With Advanced Cancer Initiating Cancer Treatment. Oncologist 2022; 27:e580-e588. [PMID: 35348764 PMCID: PMC9255971 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Polypharmacy is prevalent in older adults starting cancer treatment and associated with potentially inappropriate medications (PIM), potential drug-drug interactions (DDI), and drug-cancer treatment interactions (DCI). For a large cohort of vulnerable older adults with advanced cancer starting treatment, we describe patterns of prescription and nonprescription medication usage, the prevalence of PIM, and the prevalence, severity, and type of DDI/DCI. METHODS This secondary analysis used baseline data from a randomized study enrolling patients aged ≥70 years with advanced cancer starting a new systemic cancer treatment (University of Rochester Cancer Center [URCC] 13059; PI: Mohile). PIM were categorized using 2019 Beers criteria and Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions. Potential DDI/DCI were evaluated using Lexi-Interact Online. Medication classification followed the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical system. Bivariate associations were evaluated between sociodemographic and geriatric assessment (GA) measures and medication measures. Chord diagrams and network analysis were used to understand and describe DDI/DCI. RESULTS Among 718 patients (mean age 77.6 years), polypharmacy (≥5 medications), excessive polypharmacy (≥10 medications), and ≥1 PIM were identified in 61.3%,14.5%, and 67.1%, respectively. Cardiovascular medications were the most prevalent (47%), and nonprescription medications accounted for 26% of total medications and 40% of PIM. One-quarter of patients had ≥1 potential major DDI not involving cancer treatment, and 5.4% had ≥1 potential major DCI. Each additional medication increased the odds of a potential major DDI and DCI by 39% and 12%, respectively. Polypharmacy and PIM are associated with multiple GA domains. CONCLUSION In a cohort of vulnerable older adults with advanced cancer starting treatment, polypharmacy, PIM, and potential DDI/DCI are very common. Nonprescription medications are frequently PIMs and/or involved in potential DDI/DCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Ramsdale
- Corresponding Author: Erika Ramsdale, MD, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. Tel: 585-275-2376;
| | | | - Veronica Yu
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Ethan Otto
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Katherine Juba
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Wegmans School of Pharmacy, Rochester, NY, USA,Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Hala Awad
- Clinical & Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Kiran Moorthi
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Sandy Plumb
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Amita Patil
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas Vogelzang
- Nevada Cancer Research Foundation, NCI Community Oncology Research Program, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | - Elie Dib
- St. Joseph Mercy Cancer Center, Ypsilanti, MI, USA
| | - Supriya Mohile
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Growdon ME, Espejo E, Jing B, Boscardin WJ, Zullo AR, Yaffe K, Boockvar KS, Steinman MA. Attitudes toward deprescribing among older adults with dementia in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:1764-1773. [PMID: 35266141 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with dementia (PWD) take medications that may be unnecessary or harmful. This problem can be addressed through deprescribing, but it is unclear if PWD would be willing to engage in deprescribing with their providers. Our goal was to investigate attitudes toward deprescribing among PWD. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of 422 PWD aged ≥65 years who completed the medications attitudes module of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) in 2016. Proxies provided responses when a participant was unable to respond due to health or cognitive problems. Attitudinal outcomes comprised responses to two statements from the patients' attitudes toward deprescribing questionnaire and its revised version (representing belief about the necessity of one's medications and willingness to deprescribe); another elicited the maximum number of pills that a respondent would be comfortable taking. RESULTS The weighted sample represented over 1.8 million PWD; 39% were 75 to 84 years old and 38% were 85 years or older, 60% were female, and 55% reported six or more regular medications. Proxies provided responses for 26% of PWD. Overall, 22% believed that they may be taking one or more medicines that they no longer needed, 87% were willing to stop one or more of their medications, and 50% were uncomfortable taking five or more medications. Attitudinal outcomes were similar across sociodemographic and clinical factors. PWD taking ≥6 medications were more likely to endorse a belief that at least one medication was no longer necessary compared to those taking <6 (adjusted probability 29% [95% confidence interval (CI), 22%-38%] vs. 13% [95% CI, 8%-20%]; p = 0.004); the same applied for willingness to deprescribe (92% [95% CI, 87%-95%] vs. 83% [95% CI, 76%-89%]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS A majority of PWD are willing to deprescribe, representing an opportunity to improve quality of life for this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew E Growdon
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Edie Espejo
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Bocheng Jing
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - W John Boscardin
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Andrew R Zullo
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Center of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Department of Pharmacy, Lifespan-Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Kristine Yaffe
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Kenneth S Boockvar
- The New Jewish Home, New York, New York, USA.,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.,James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Michael A Steinman
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rakheja B, Sirois C, Ouellet N, Roux B, Laroche ML. Attitudes Toward Deprescribing in Older Adults and Caregivers: A Survey in Quebec, Canada. J Appl Gerontol 2022; 41:1376-1384. [PMID: 35246001 PMCID: PMC9024025 DOI: 10.1177/07334648211069553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to describe attitudes toward deprescribing among older adults and caregivers. We recruited 110 adults 65 years and above using at least one prescribed medication for at least 3 months, and 95 unrelated caregivers (18+) of older adults with such characteristics, who answered the validated French version of the revised Patients’ Attitudes Towards Deprescribing questionnaire. More older adults (84.5%) than caregivers (70.5%) (p = .007) would be willing to stop at least one medication if the doctor said it was possible. Conversely, 93.5% of older adults and 78.9% of caregivers were satisfied with the current medications taken (p = .0024). The results did not vary according to age, sex, number of medications taken, education level, or residency. Thus, older adults and caregivers are disposed to undertake deprescribing, regardless of sociodemographic characteristics. However, relying solely on satisfaction with current medications may not be sufficient to identify relevant deprescribing opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Rakheja
- Faculté de Médecine, 12369Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Caroline Sirois
- Faculté de Pharmacie, 4440Université Laval, Québec, Canada.,Centre d'excellence sur le Vieillissement de Québec, Québec, Canada.,VITAM, Centre de Recherche en Santé durable, Québec, Canada
| | - Nicole Ouellet
- Département des Sciences Infirmières, 14846Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, Canada
| | - Barbara Roux
- Centre de Pharmacovigilance, de Pharmacoépidémiologie et d'information sur Les Médicaments, 36715CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Marie-Laure Laroche
- Centre de Pharmacovigilance, de Pharmacoépidémiologie et d'information sur Les Médicaments, 36715CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.,Laboratoire Vie-Santé, Faculté de Médecine de Limoges, Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hollingsworth EK, Shah AS, Shotwell MS, Simmons SF, Vasilevskis EE. Older Patient and Surrogate Attitudes Toward Deprescribing During the Transition From Acute to Post-Acute Care. J Appl Gerontol 2022; 41:788-797. [PMID: 35164584 PMCID: PMC8867732 DOI: 10.1177/07334648211015756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Attitudes toward deprescribing among hospitalized older patients transitioning to post-acute care in the United States are less known. This study describes older patients' and their surrogate's attitudes using all items of the Patient Attitudes Toward Deprescribing (PATD) questionnaire and compares perceived pill burden to the actual count of total daily pills and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Overall, 93% of participants were willing to deprescribe if their physician agreed. Compared to patients, surrogates had 64% reduced odds (95% CI: 0.18-0.74) of believing that all of the care recipient's medications were necessary and 61% reduced odds (95% CI: 0.17-0.88) of attributing cost as a factor in deprescribing. Perceptions of medication burden were associated with patients' total daily pills (median 16) and PIMS (median 7), yet 61% agreed that all their medicines were necessary. Patients and surrogates typically express a willingness to deprescribe but have differing perceptions of medication appropriateness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sandra Faye Simmons
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, USA
| | - Eduard Eric Vasilevskis
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, USA
| |
Collapse
|