Cost-effectiveness of Recurrent Dupuytren Contracture Treatment

Comparison of Patient Demographics, Utilization Trends, and Costs of Treatment for Dupuytren's Disease in the United States From 2012 to 2019

INTRODUCTION

Dupuytren's disease is a fibroproliferative disorder of the palm leading to flexion deformities of the digits that impair hand function. Studies have evaluated treatment trends for patients with Dupuytren's disease; however, most conclude in 2012 shortly after collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injection was introduced to the market. It is unknown how provider preferences have been influenced since its introduction. We aimed to compare treatment options with regard to (1) patient demographics, (2) annual utilization rates, and (3) costs.

METHODS

The PearlDiver nationwide administrative claims database from 2012 to 2019 was analyzed for patients diagnosed with Dupuytren's disease (N = 47,813). Patients receiving procedural treatment were identified using codes for percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA) (current procedural terminology [CPT] 26040), open fasciotomy (CPT 26045), open fasciectomy (CPT 26121, 26123, 26125), and CCH injection (CPT 20527). Fasciectomies were further analyzed by examining the number of patients receiving release of 1 or more digits (CPT 26123, 26125) versus palmar-only surgery (CPT 26121). Outcomes included comparing patient comorbidities comprising the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), frequencies of each procedure annually, and costs. Linear regressions evaluated changes in utilization over time. Analysis of variance compared costs. P values less than 0.05 were significant.

RESULTS

Patient demographics for each treatment differed with respect to age, sex, and the presence of multiple comorbidities comprising the ECI. Open fasciectomy (60.7%) was the predominant treatment, followed by CCH injection (22.9%), PNA (10.1%), and open fasciotomy (6.3%) ( P < 0.001). Multiple patient comorbidities comprising the ECI differed for each treatment. Relative to total annual procedures from 2012 to 2019, PNA declined (10.2% to 9.5%, P = 0.037), open fasciotomy declined (6.8% to 5.6%, P = 0.007), palmar fasciectomy remained constant (14.5% to 14.2%, P = 0.710), fasciectomy of digits increased (46.3% to 47.5%, P = 0.030), and CCH injection remained constant (22.2% to 23.3%, P = 0.623). Day of procedure costs were significantly different for PNA ($573), open fasciotomy ($1176), palmar open fasciectomy ($1410), open fasciectomy digits ($1560), and CCH injection ($1250) ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall annual Dupuytren's disease treatment did not change over time. Treatment with open fasciectomy continues to be preferred. Collagenase clostridium histolyticum utilization has remained constant since its introduction. This study may assist hand surgeons in educating patients on the treatment and costs related to Dupuytren's disease.

Evaluating Shared Decision-Making in Treatment Selection for Dupuytren Contracture: A Mixed Methods Approach

BACKGROUND

Patients with Dupuytren contracture can receive a variety of surgical and nonsurgical treatments. The extent to which patients participate in the shared decision-making process is unclear.

METHODS

An explanatory-sequential mixed-methods study was conducted. Participants completed the Nine-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire before completing semi-structured interviews in which they described their experience with selecting treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty participants [25 men (83%) and five women (17%); mean age, 69 years (range, 51 to 84 years)] received treatment for Dupuytren contracture (11 collagenase injection, six needle aponeurotomy, and 13 limited fasciectomy). Adjusted mean scores for the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire were 71 (SD 20) and 77 (SD 16), respectively, indicating a high degree of shared decision-making and satisfaction. Patients who received limited fasciectomy accepted invasiveness and prolonged recovery time because they believed it provided a long-term solution. Patients chose needle aponeurotomy and collagenase injection because the treatments were perceived as safer and more convenient and permitted rapid return to daily activities, which was particularly valued by patients who were employed or had bilateral contractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should help patients choose a treatment that aligns with the patient's preferences for long-term versus short-term results, recovery period and postoperative rehabilitation, and risk of complications, because patients used this information to assist in their treatment selection. Areas of improvement for shared decision-making include equal presentation of all treatments and ensuring realistic patient expectations regarding the chronic and recurrent nature of Dupuytren contracture regardless of treatment received.

Dupuytren contracture: using qualitative data to inform a conceptual framework for shared decision-making

Multiple treatment options are available to patients with Dupuytren contracture, making shared decision-making complex. Our rigorous qualitative analysis sought to understand patient perceptions of shared decision-making in Dupuytren contracture treatment and create a conceptual framework to optimize patient-physician communication. We interviewed 30 patients with Dupuytren contracture to learn about their experience with treatment selection. The following themes were integral to shared decision-making for Dupuytren contracture treatment: discussing disease progression and treatment initiation, presenting all available treatment options, assessing patients' pre-existing biases towards treatment, patient values and preferences for treatment trade-offs, treatment risks and benefits, physician recommendation and active patient participation. This model can optimize communication about treatment options and expectations for relevant outcomes including, recovery time, contracture recurrence, complications, and treatment-related expenses.Level of evidence: V.

Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for early-stage Dupuytren’s disease

Aims

To estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of adalimumab compared with standard care alone for the treatment of early-stage Dupuytren’s disease (DD) and the value of further research from an NHS perspective.

Methods

We used data from the Repurposing anti-TNF for Dupuytren’s disease (RIDD) randomized controlled trial of intranodular adalimumab injections in patients with early-stage progressive DD. RIDD found that intranodular adalimumab injections reduced nodule hardness and size in patients with early-stage DD, indicating the potential to control disease progression. A within-trial cost-utility analysis compared four adalimumab injections with no further treatment against standard care alone, taking a 12-month time horizon and using prospective data on EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and resource use from the RIDD trial. We also developed a patient-level simulation model similar to a Markov model to extrapolate trial outcomes over a lifetime using data from the RIDD trial and a literature review. This also evaluated repeated courses of adalimumab each time the nodule reactivated (every three years) in patients who initially responded.

Results

The within-trial economic evaluation found that adalimumab plus standard care cost £503,410 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained versus standard care alone over a 12-month time horizon. The model-based extrapolation suggested that, over a lifetime, repeated courses of adalimumab could cost £14,593 (95% confidence interval £7,534 to £42,698) per QALY gained versus standard care alone. If the NHS was willing to pay £20,000/QALY gained, there is a 77% probability that adalimumab with retreatment is the best value for money.

Conclusion

Repeated courses of adalimumab are likely to be a cost-effective treatment for progressive early-stage DD. The value of perfect parameter information that would eliminate all uncertainty around the parameters estimated in RIDD and the duration of quiescence was estimated to be £105 per patient or £272 million for all 2,584,411 prevalent cases in the UK. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(11):898–906.

The CeCORD-J study on collagenase injection versus aponeurectomy for Dupuytren's contracture compared by hand function and cost effectiveness

This study compared hand function and the cost-effectiveness of treatment between collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injection and limited fasciectomy for patients with Dupuytren’s contracture (DC). The CeCORD-J study is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized controlled, observational study of two parallel groups. Participants were DC patients with multiple affected fingers, including flexion contracture of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. The primary outcome was the Hand10 score, as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). We set secondary outcomes of EQ-5D-5L (QOL) score, degree of extension deficit, and direct cost. Propensity score adjustment was used to balance differences in patient characteristics between groups. Participants comprised 52 patients in the Collagenase group and 26 patients in the Surgery group. There were no significant differences in the Hand10 and QOL scores between the two groups at 26 weeks. Mean direct cost was 248,000 yen higher in the Surgery group than in the Collagenase group. Extension deficit angle of the PIP joint was significantly larger in the Collagenase group at 26 weeks. Although the Collagenase group showed dominance in cost-effectiveness, there was no significant difference between the two groups in hand function at 26 weeks.

Associations among quality of life, activities, and participation in elderly residents with joint contractures in long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional study

Background

Joint contractures and degenerative osteoarthritis are the most common joint diseases in the elderly population, can lead to limited mobility in elderly individuals, can exacerbate symptoms such as pain, stiffness, and disability, and can interfere with social participation and quality of life, thus affecting mental health. However, relevant studies on this topic are very limited. This study describes the associations of joint contracture categories and sites in elderly residents in long-term care facilities with their quality of life, activities, and participation.

Methods

Elderly individuals with joint contractures who were residents in long-term care facilities were recruited. The World Health Organization (WHO) Quality of Life and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 were used to survey the participants. Correlations, multiple linear regressions, and multiple analyses of variance, with joint contractures as the response variable, were used in the statistical analysis.

Results

The final statistical analysis included 232 participants. The explanatory power of contracture sites on activities and participation had a moderate strength of association (η2 = .113). Compared with elderly residents with joint contractures and osteoarthritis isolated to the upper limbs, those with joint contractures and osteoarthritis in both the upper and lower limbs had significantly worse activity and participation limitations. No significant differences in activity and participation were found between elderly residents with joint contractures affecting only the upper limbs and those with joint contractures affecting only the lower limbs (F1,226 = 2.604 and F1,226 = 0.674, nonsignificant). Osteoarthritis had the greatest impact on activity limitations and participation restrictions among elderly residents with joint contractures affecting both the upper and lower limbs (F1,226 = 6.251, p = .014).

Conclusions

Elderly residents in long-term care facilities belonging to minority groups, with a history of stroke, and with osteoarthritis are at a high risk of developing activity limitations and participation restrictions. Moreover, compared with other contraction sites, regardless of osteoarthritis, joint contractures affecting both the upper and lower limbs were associated with the greatest activity limitations and participation restrictions.

Trial registration

This study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registration number and date:ChiCTR2000039889 (13/11/2020).

Dupuytren's Disease: An Outcomes-Focused Update

Dupuytren's disease (DD) remains a common fibroproliferative condition with significant sequelae and impact on patient's lives. The etiology of DD is poorly understood, and genetic predisposition is thought to be a strongly associated factor. Despite remarkable strides in improving our molecular understanding of DD, clinical treatment options have not yet overcome the frequently encountered challenge of recurrence. Recurrence rates continue to shape the prognosis of this fibrotic condition. In this outcomes-focused article, the various treatment modalities are reviewed. This further emphasizes the importance of patient education and providing them with the information to make informed decisions about their treatment.

Current Concepts in the Management of Dupuytren Disease of the Hand

Dupuytren disease is a fibroproliferative disorder of the palmar fascia of the hand. Little agreement and remarkable variability exists in treatment algorithms between surgeons. Because the cellular and molecular etiology of Dupuytren has been elucidated, ongoing efforts have been made to identify potential chemotherapeutic targets that could modulate the phenotypic expression of the disease. Although these efforts may dramatically alter the approach to treating this disease in the future, these approaches are largely experimental at this point. Over the past decade, the mainstay nonsurgical options have continued to be percutaneous needle aponeurotomy and collagenase Clostridium hystoliticum, and the most common surgical option is limited fasciectomy.