Single vs Serial Measurements of Cardiac Troponin Level in the Evaluation of Patients in the Emergency Department With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction

External Validation of the Recalibrated HEART Score for Evaluation of Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome

A single high-sensitivity troponin-T (hs-TnT) measurement may be sufficient to risk-stratify emergency department (ED) patients with possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using the recalibrated History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk Factors, Troponin (rHEART) score. We sought to validate this approach in a multiethnic population of United States patients and investigate gender-specific differences in performance. We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of adult ED patients with possible ACS at a single, urban, academic hospital. We investigated the diagnostic performance of rHEART for the incidence of type-1 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and other major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days, using both single (19 ng/L) and gender-specific (14 ng/L for women, 22 ng/L for men) 99th percentile hs-TnT thresholds. The 821 patients included were 54% women, 57% Hispanic, and 26% Black. Overall, 4.6% of patients had MACE, including 2.4% with AMI. Single-threshold rHEART ≤3 had a sensitivity of 94.4% (95% confidence interval 81% to 99%) and negative predictive values of 99.3% (98% to 100%) for MACE; gender-specific thresholds performed nearly identically. Sensitivity and negative predictive values for AMI were 90.0% (67% to 98%) and 99.3% (97% to 100%). Excluding patients presenting <3 hours from symptom onset improved sensitivity for MACE and AMI to 97.0% (84% to 100%) and 94.1% (71% to 100%). Logistic regression demonstrated odds of MACE increased with higher rHEART scores at a similar rate for men and women. In conclusion, a single initial hs-TnT and rHEART score can be used to risk-stratify male and female ED patients with possible ACS, especially when drawn >3 hours after symptom onset.

Biomarkers in pursuit of precision medicine for acute kidney injury: hard to get rid of customs

Traditional acute kidney injury (AKI) classifications, which are centered around semi-anatomical lines, can no longer capture the complexity of AKI. By employing strategies to identify predictive and prognostic enrichment targets, experts could gain a deeper comprehension of AKI's pathophysiology, allowing for the development of treatment-specific targets and enhancing individualized care. Subphenotyping, which is enriched with AKI biomarkers, holds insights into distinct risk profiles and tailored treatment strategies that redefine AKI and contribute to improved clinical management. The utilization of biomarkers such as N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease-2·insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7, kidney injury molecule-1, and liver fatty acid-binding protein garnered significant attention as a means to predict subclinical AKI. Novel biomarkers offer promise in predicting persistent AKI, with urinary motif chemokine ligand 14 displaying significant sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, they serve as predictive markers for weaning patients from acute dialysis and offer valuable insights into distinct AKI subgroups. The proposed management of AKI, which is encapsulated in a structured flowchart, bridges the gap between research and clinical practice. It streamlines the utilization of biomarkers and subphenotyping, promising a future in which AKI is swiftly identified and managed with unprecedented precision. Incorporating kidney biomarkers into strategies for early AKI detection and the initiation of AKI care bundles has proven to be more effective than using care bundles without these novel biomarkers. This comprehensive approach represents a significant stride toward precision medicine, enabling the identification of high-risk subphenotypes in patients with AKI.

Is having a moderate or low history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin risk score a handicap for long-term mortality?

OBJECTIVE

History, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin risk score and troponin level follow-up are used to safely discharge low-risk patients with suspected non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome from the emergency department for a 1-month period. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the 6-month mortality of patients with the history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin risk score.

METHODS

A total of 949 non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to the emergency department from 01.01.2019 to 01.10.2019 were included in this retrospective study. History, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin scores of all patients were calculated by two emergency clinicians and a cardiologist. We compared the 6-month mortality of the groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 67.9 (56.4-79) years; 57.3% were male and 42.7% were female. Six-month mortality was significantly lower in the high-risk history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin score group than in the low- and moderate-risk groups: 11/80 (12.1%), 58/206 (22%), and 150/444 (25.3%), respectively (p=0.019).

CONCLUSION

Patients with high history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin risk scores are generally treated with coronary angioplasty as soon as possible. We found that the mortality rate of this group of patients was lower in the long term compared with others. Efforts are also needed to reduce the mortality of moderate and low-risk patients. Further studies are needed on the factors affecting the 6-month mortality of moderate and low-risk acute coronary syndrome patients.

Optimizing the Clinical Use of High-Sensitivity Troponin Assays: A Review

Ischemic heart diseases (IHDs) remain a global health concern. Many IHD cases go undiagnosed due to challenges in the initial diagnostic process, particularly in cases of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have revolutionized myocardial injury assessment, but variations in diagnostic cut-off values and population differences have raised challenges. This review addresses essential laboratory and clinical considerations for hs-cTn assays. Laboratory guidelines discuss the importance of establishing standardized 99th-percentile upper reference limits (URLs) considering factors such as age, sex, health status, and analytical precision. The reference population should exclude individuals with comorbidities like diabetes and renal disease, and rigorous selection is crucial. Some clinical guidelines emphasize the significance of sex-specific URL limits while others do not. They highlight the use of serial troponin assays for AMI diagnosis. In addition, timely reporting of accurate hs-cTn results is essential for effective clinical use. This review aims to provide a clearer understanding among laboratory professionals and clinicians on how to optimize the use of hs-cTn assays in clinical settings in order to ensure accurate AMI diagnosis and thus improve patient care and outcomes.

Potential performance of a 0 h/1 h algorithm and a single cut-off measure of high-sensitivity troponin T in a diverse population: main results of the IN-HOPE study

AIMS

Chest pain is a major cause of medical evaluation at emergency department (ED) and demands observation to exclude the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays used as isolated measure and by 0- and 1-h algorithms are accepted as a rule-in/rule-out strategy, but there is a lack of validation in specific populations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The IN-HOspital Program to systematizE Chest Pain Protocol (IN-HOPE study) is a multicentre study that prospectively included patients admitted to the ED due to suspected symptoms of AMI at 16 sites in Brazil. Medical decisions of all patients followed the standard approach of 0 h/3 h protocol, but, in addition, blood samples were also collected at 0 and 1 h and sent to a central laboratory (core lab) to measure high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). To assess the theoretical performance of 0 h/1 h algorithm, troponin < 12 ng/L with a delta < 3 was considered rule-out while a value ≥ 52 or a delta ≥ 5 was considered a rule-in criterion (the remaining were considered as observation group). The main objective of the study was to assess, in a population managed by the 0 h/3 h protocol, the accuracy of 0 h/1 h algorithm overall and in groups with a higher probability of AMI. All patients were followed up for 30 days, and potential events were adjudicated. In addition to the prospective cohort, a retrospective analysis was performed assessing all patients with hs-cTnT measured during the year of 2021 but not included in the prospective cohort, regardless of the indication of the test. A total of 5.497 patients were included (583 in the prospective and 4.914 in the retrospective analysis). The prospective cohort had a mean age of 57.3 (± 14.8) and 45.6% of females with a mean HEART score of 4.0 ± 2.2. By the core lab analysis, 74.4% would be eligible for a rule-out approach (45.3% of them with a HEART score > 3) while 7.3% would fit the rule-in criteria. In this rule-out group, the negative predictive value for index AMI was 100% (99.1-100) overall and regardless of clinical scores. At 30 days, no death or AMI occurred in the rule-out group of both 0/1 and 0/3 h algorithms while 52.4% of the patients in the rule-in group (0 h/1 h) were considered as AMI by adjudication. In the observation group (grey zone) of 0 h/1 h algorithm, GRACE discriminated the risk of these patients better than HEART score. In the retrospective analysis, 1.091 patients had a troponin value of <5 ng/L and there were no cardiovascular deaths at 30 days in this group. Among all 4.914 patients, the 30-day risk of AMI or cardiovascular death increased according to the level of troponin: 0% in the group < 5 ng/L, 0.6% between 5 and 14 ng/L, 2.2% between 14 and 42 ng/L, 6.3% between 42 and 90 ng/L, and 7.7% in the level ≥ 90 ng/L.

CONCLUSION

In this large multicentre study, a 0 h/1 h algorithm had the potential to classify as rule-in or rule-out in almost 80% of the patients. The rule-out protocol had high negative predictive value regardless of clinical risk scores. Categories of levels of hs-cTn T also showed good accuracy in discriminating risk of the patients with a very favourable prognosis for cardiovascular death in the group with value < 5 ng/L.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV

NCT04756362.

Derivation of a HEAR Pathway for Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients to Safely Avoid a Second Troponin Test

The study aims to develop a decision pathway based on HEAR score and 0 h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) to safely avoid a second troponin test for suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in emergency departments. A HEAR score consists of history, electrocardiogram, age, and risk factors. A HEAR pathway is established using a Bayesian approach based on a predefined safety threshold of NSTEMI prevalence in the rule-out group. In total, 7131 patients were retrospectively enrolled, 582 (8.2%) with index visit NSTEMI and 940 (13.2%) with 180-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). For patients with a low-risk HEAR score (0 to 2) and low 0 h hs-cTnT (<14 ng/L), the HEAR pathway recommends early discharge without further testing. After the HEAR pathway had been applied to rule out NSTEMI, the negative predictive value of index visit NSTEMI was 100.0% (95% CI, 99.8% to 100.0%) and false-negative rate of 180-day MACE was 0.40% (95% CI, 0.18% to 0.87%). Compared with the 0 h hs-cTnT < limit of detection (LoD) strategy (<5 ng/L), the HEAR pathway could correctly reclassify 1298 patients without MACE as low risk and lead to a 18.2% decrease (95% CI, 17.4-19.1%) in the need for a second troponin test. The HEAR pathway may lead to a substantial and safe reduction in repeated troponin test for emergency department patients with suspected NSTEMI.

Cardiovascular Disease in Women: An Update for Nurses

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in women but is often underrecognized and undertreated. Women are more likely to experience delay in treatment and worse outcomes, even though they experience similar symptoms as men. Women are more likely to experience ischemia related to microvascular dysfunction, which is not readily diagnosed by commonly used diagnostic tests. Nurses are ideally positioned to be patient advocates and use evidence-based guidelines to encourage primary prevention and ensure prompt treatment. This paper provides an update on CVD in women for clinical nurses based on the latest research evidence.

Diagnoses and Outcomes of Patients with Suspicion of Acute Coronary Syndrome and Raised High Sensitive Troponin I: A Single Center Study from Pakistan

Objectives  Troponins are classically raised in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) although other cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes are recognized. We aimed to see the association of high sensitivity (Hs) Troponin I values exceeding the sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) with diagnoses, emergency department (ED) outcomes, 30-day outcomes of admitted patients and predictors of ACS in both genders. Materials and Methods  A retrospective study of all patients presenting to the emergency department from January 2019 to April 2021 with suspicion of ACS and Hs-Troponin I values greater than the sex-specific 99th percentile URL. Statistical Analysis  SPSS version 24 was used, Pearson's chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, and odds ratios, including the 95% confidence intervals, for each characteristic were used for analysis. A p -value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results  There were a total of 5,982 patients (3,031 males, 2,951 females), out of which 878 patients were admitted under the cardiology specialty. In patients who were admitted to the ward, mortality was higher in females (8.2%) with less than a 10-fold rise in Hs-Troponin I while similar in both genders (7.6%) in patients with Hs-troponin I greater than 10-fold of sex-specific 99th percentile URL. Raised low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was a significant factor associated with 2.4 times higher odds of ACS. Conclusion  Women with Hs-Troponin values up to 10 times the URL, i.e., 15.6-160 ng/L have higher mortality than their male counterparts. LDL-cholesterol is a significant risk factor for ACS which should be controlled for its prevention.

Utility of serial conventional troponin testing for emergency department patients stratified by HEART score and symptom timing

BACKGROUND

The HEART score for risk stratifying chest pain patients in the emergency department (ED) has been widely adopted in clinical practice, but is often employed with nonconformant serial troponin measurements.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to examine the utility of obtaining a second conventional 3-h troponin I (TnI) level in ED patients presenting with potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stratified by HEART score and duration of symptoms.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult ED patients with a complete HEART score. We assessed the utility of repeat TnI measurement by examining the positivity rate of ΔTnI = [Second TnI] - [Initial TnI] stratified by HEART score and time elapsed since onset or resolution of symptoms. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 6 weeks of index visit were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 944 patients were included with 433 (45.9%) assigned a low risk HEART score 0-3. Of the 268 (61.9%) low risk HEART score patients receiving a second TnI, only 3 (1.1%, [0.2-3.2%]) resulted in a positive ΔTnI, one of which occurred in the setting of an elevated initial TnI. Overall, patients presenting within 3 h of symptoms were more likely to experience positive ΔTnI, index MACE and MACE at 6 weeks compared to patients presenting ≥3 h since symptoms onset/resolution and patients with unknown timing of symptoms (15.9% vs 11.0% vs 10.3%, p < 0.001; 10.0% vs 5.3% vs 4.6%, p = 0.021; 12.7% vs 6.6% vs 6.4%, p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest serial measurement of conventional troponin provides limited added benefit in low risk HEART score patients, regardless of duration and timing of symptoms. Conversely, serial troponin measurement may confer utility in moderate/high risk HEART score patients, particularly those presenting within 3 h of symptoms.

Risk stratification of patients with chest pain who have an unscheduled revisit to the emergency department

AIMS

Acute cardiovascular (CV) emergencies are critical conditions that require urgent attention in the emergency department (ED). Failure to make a timely diagnosis may result in unscheduled ED revisits and severe outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with potentially missed acute CV emergencies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective study enrolled adult patients who presented with chest pain and returned to the ED within 72 h. Demographic information, pre-existing medical conditions, chief complaints, triage level and vital signs, electrocardiography (ECG) reports, and laboratory data were collected from medical charts by independent physicians. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of acute CV diseases, including ACS, pulmonary embolism, unstable arrhythmia, acute decompensated heart failure, and aortic dissection. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the association between variables and acute CV emergencies. A total of 453 eligible patients were included, with 60 (13.2%) patients diagnosed as acute CV emergencies at the ED revisit. Risk factors for acute CV emergencies included male gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17-6.25), abnormal ECG rhythm (aOR = 10.33, 95% CI = 4.68-22.83), and abnormal changes in high sensitivity Troponin-T (hs-cTnT) during sequential follow-up (aOR = 6.52, 95% CI = 2.19-19.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Male gender, abnormal ECG rhythm, and a significant increase in sequential follow-up hs-cTnT levels were identified as significant risk factors for acute CV emergencies. ED physicians should recognize these high-risk patients with chest pain to prevent misdiagnosis and potential severe complications.

Chest Pain Management Using Prehospital Point-of-Care Troponin and Paramedic Risk Assessment

Importance

Prehospital point-of-care troponin testing and paramedic risk stratification might improve the efficiency of chest pain care pathways compared with existing processes with equivalent health outcomes, but the association with health care costs is unclear.

Objective

To analyze whether prehospital point-of-care troponin testing and paramedic risk stratification could result in cost savings compared with existing chest pain care pathways.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this economic evaluation of adults with acute chest pain without ST-segment elevation, cost-minimization analysis was used to assess linked ambulance, emergency, and hospital attendance in the state of Victoria, Australia, between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019.

Interventions

Paramedic risk stratification and point-of-care troponin testing.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The outcome was estimated mean annualized statewide costs for acute chest pain. Between May 17 and June 25, 2022, decision tree models were developed to estimate costs under 3 pathways: (1) existing care, (2) paramedic risk stratification and point-of-care troponin testing without prehospital discharge, or (3) prehospital discharge and referral to a virtual emergency department (ED) for low-risk patients. Probabilities for the prehospital pathways were derived from a review of the literature. Multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 50 000 Monte Carlo iterations was used to estimate mean costs and cost differences among pathways.

Results

A total of 188 551 patients attended by ambulance for chest pain (mean [SD] age, 61.9 [18.3] years; 50.5% female; 49.5% male; Indigenous Australian, 2.0%) were included in the model. Estimated annualized infrastructure and staffing costs for the point-of-care troponin pathways, assuming a 5-year device life span, was $2.27 million for the pathway without prehospital discharge and $4.60 million for the pathway with prehospital discharge (incorporating virtual ED costs). In the decision tree model, total annual cost using prehospital point-of-care troponin and paramedic risk stratification was lower compared with existing care both without prehospital discharge (cost savings, $6.45 million; 95% uncertainty interval [UI], $0.59-$16.52 million; lower in 94.1% of iterations) and with prehospital discharge (cost savings, $42.84 million; 95% UI, $19.35-$72.26 million; lower in 100% of iterations).

Conclusions and Relevance

Prehospital point-of-care troponin and paramedic risk stratification for patients with acute chest pain could result in substantial cost savings. These findings should be considered by policy makers in decisions surrounding the potential utility of prehospital chest pain risk stratification and point-of-care troponin models provided that safety is confirmed in prospective studies.

T-MACS score vs HEART score identification of major adverse cardiac events in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, and its prevalence is rising.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the HEART and T-MACS scores for predicting major cardiac events (MACE) in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.

METHOD

This study was single center and prospectively conducted. The demographic information, T-MACS and HEART scores of the participants were recorded and calculated. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI), mortality, and the need for coronary revascularization were considered as major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS (IBM Statistics, New York) version 24, and significance was determined at the p < 0.05 level.

RESULTS

The 514 patients included in our study had a mean age of 52.01 ± 19.10 years, with 55.3% were female and 44.7% was male. A total of 78(%15.1) cases were diagnosed with AMI. Fifty patients (%9.7) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, 12 (%2.3) patients underwent coronary artery by-pass graft, and 8 (%1.5) patients died within a one-month period. The sensitivity and negative predictive values of the T-MACS score for the very low risk classification were 93.90% (86.3%-98.0%) and 97.7% (94.7%-99.0%), respectively, and the sensitivity and negative predictive values of the HEART score for the low risk classification were 89.59% (77.3%-93.1%) and 96.6% (94.2%-98.0%), respectively. The specificity and positive predictive values for the high risk classification were 99.77% (98.7%-100%) and 97.2% (82.9%-99.6%), respectively for the T-MACS score and 95.14% (92.7%-97%) and 63.2% (51.4%-73.5%), respectively for the HEART score.

CONCLUSION

The T-MACS score was shown to be more accurate than the HEART score in predicting low risk (very low risk for the T-MACS score), high risk, and anticipated one-month risk for MACE in patients coming to the emergency department with chest pain.

A Closer Look at the HEART Score

The history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin (HEART) score is currently a widely used tool for acute chest pain risk stratification. Relatively soon after its inception in 2008, a number of validation studies on the HEART score showed it to be superior to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) scores and at least as accurate to other existing scores for predicting short-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). However, partly due to its focus on simplicity, the HEART score has some limitations. In this article we review how the HEART score has evolved and taken on various modifications to circumvent some of its limitations. We also highlight the strength of the HEART score in comparison with other risk stratification tools and the current guidelines.

Diagnostic efficacy of serum ST2 in patients with ASC

BACKGROUND

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) is closely related to the development of cardiovascular disease, but the level of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the relationship between ST2 and ACS are unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with the acute coronary syndrome were divided into the unstable angina pectoris (USAP) group (n = 65) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) group (n = 58), and the healthy population, without chest pain and with normal coronary CT, was included as a control group (n = 55). Laboratory index levels were collected from each participant. The baseline information was reviewed and analyzed. The binary logistic regression was used to explore the relation of ST2 levels with the occurrence of ACS and NSTEMI, and the diagnostic performance of ST2 for diagnosing ACS or NSTEMI was evaluated using a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

The level of ST2 was found significantly higher in NSTEMI than in USAP and was higher in USAP than in control (p < 0.01). ST2 levels were positively correlated with ALT, AST, and BNP in the control group, were negatively correlated with HGB and TG in the USAP group, and were positively correlated with WBC, GLU, BNP, and Gensini scores in the NSTEMI group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the occurrence of ACS was associated with ST2, BNP, GLU, TC, BUN, WBC, and PLT, and the occurrence of NSTEMI was associated with AST, WBC, LDL-C, and ST2. Meanwhile, ST2 levels achieved good performance for ACS and NSTEMI diagnostician.

CONCLUSION

ST2 could be used as an auxiliary diagnostic indicator for the occurrence of ACS and NSTEMI.

Rapid Exclusion of Acute Myocardial Injury and Infarction with a Single High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in the Emergency Department: a Multicenter United States Evaluation

BACKGROUND

There are good data to support using a single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) below the limit of detection (LoD) of 5 ng/L to exclude acute myocardial infarction. Per the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), hs-cTnT can only report to the limit of quantitation (LoQ) of 6 ng/L, a threshold for which there is limited data. Our goal was to determine whether a single hs-cTnT below the LoQ of 6 ng/L is a safe strategy to identify patients at low-risk for acute myocardial injury and infarction.

METHODS

The efficacy (proportion identified as low-risk based on baseline hs-cTnT<6 ng/L) of identifying low-risk patients was examined in a multicenter (n=22 sites) US cohort study of emergency department patients undergoing at least one hs-cTnT (CV Data Mart Biomarker cohort). We then determined the performance of a single hs-cTnT<6 ng/L (biomarker alone) to exclude acute myocardial injury (subsequent hs-cTnT >99^th percentile in those with an initial hs-cTnT<6 ng/L). The clinically intended rule-out strategy combining a nonischemic electrocardiogram with a baseline hs-cTnT<6 ng/L was subsequently tested in an adjudicated cohort in which the diagnostic performance for ruling-out acute myocardial infarction and safety (myocardial infarction or death at 30-days) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 85,610 patients were evaluated in the CV Data Mart Biomarker cohort, amongst which 24,646 (29%) had a baseline hs-cTnT<6 ng/L. Women were more likely than men to have hs-cTnT<6 ng/L (38% vs. 20%, p<0.0001). Among 11,962 patients with baseline hs-cTnT<6 ng/L and serial measurements, only 1.2% developed acute myocardial injury, resulting in a negative predictive value of 98.8% (95% CI 98.6, 99.0) and sensitivity of 99.6% (95% CI 99.5, 99.6). In the adjudicated cohort, a nonischemic electrocardiogram with hs-cTnT<6 ng/L identified 33% of patients (610 of 1849) as low-risk and resulted in a negative predictive value and sensitivity of 100% and a 30-day rate of 0.2% for 30-day myocardial infarction or death.

CONCLUSIONS

A single hs-cTnT below the LoQ of 6 ng/L is a safe and rapid method to identify a substantial number of patients at very low risk for acute myocardial injury and infarction.

Referral decisions based on a pre-hospital HEART score in suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: final results of the FamouS Triage study

AIMS

Although pre-hospital risk stratification of patients with suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) by ambulance paramedics is feasible, it has not been investigated in daily practice whether referral decisions based on this risk stratification is safe and does not increase major adverse cardiac events (MACE). In Phase III of the FamouS Triage study, it was investigated whether referral decisions by ambulance paramedics based on a pre-hospital HEART score, is non-inferior to routine management.

METHODS AND RESULTS

FamouS Triage Phase III is a non-inferiority study, comparing the occurrence of MACE before (Phase II) and after (Phase III) implementation of referral decisions based on a pre-hospital HEART score. In Phase II, all patients were risk-stratified and referred to the hospital; in Phase III, low-risk patients (HEART score ≤ 3) were not referred. Primary endpoint was MACE (acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, or death) within 45 days. A total of 1236 patients were included. Mean age was 63 years, 43% were female, 700 patients were included in the second phase and 536 in the third phase in which 149 low-risk patients (28%) were not transferred to the hospital. Occurrence of 45 days MACE was 16.6% in Phase II and 15.7% in Phase III (P = 0.67). Percentage MACE in low-risk patients was 2.9% in Phase II and 1.3% in Phase III. After adjustments for differences in baseline variables, the hazard ratio of 45 days MACE in Phase III was 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.63-1.25) as compared to Phase II.

CONCLUSION

Pre-hospital risk stratification of patients with suspected NSTE-ACS, avoiding hospitalization of a substantial number of low-risk patients, seems feasible and non-inferior to transferring all patients to the hospital.

Effects of nicorandil on systemic inflammation and oxidative stress induced by percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease

Objective

The present study investigated the effects of a bolus intracoronary injection of nicorandil on systemic inflammation and oxidative stress induced by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).

Methods

Patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) were enrolled into the CAG group (n = 30). Patients undergoing PCI were randomly divided into the PCI (n = 30) and PCI + nicorandil groups (n = 30).

Results

Blood taken from patients in the placebo group 24 hours after PCI exhibited significant increases in the expression of inflammatory indicators and mild increases in the expression of anti-inflammatory indicators. The intracoronary injection of nicorandil reversed the elevation of inflammatory indicators and significantly increased the levels of anti-inflammatory indicators in the blood of patients with PCI. Blood taken from patients in the placebo group 24 hours after PCI also displayed significant decreased superoxide dismutase levels and increased malondialdehyde levels. Nicorandil treatment reversed these changes of oxidative stress marker levels.

Conclusions

These results indicated the possible medical application of intracoronary injections of nicorandil for reducing systemic inflammation and oxidative stress in the peripheral blood of patients undergoing PCI.

Biomarker und Histologie bei idiopathischen inflammatorischen Myopathien

Die idiopathischen inflammatorischen Myopathien (IIM) sind eine Gruppe entzündlicher Muskelerkrankungen für deren Diagnosestellung, Verlaufsbeurteilung, Prognoseabschätzung und Risikostratifizierung Biomarker eine jeweils essentielle Rolle spielen. Biomarker in diesem Kontext können sowohl „herkömmliche“ serologische Marker wie Muskelenzyme oder Autoantikörper, histologische Marker wie entitätsspezifische inflammatorische Muster, aber auch genomische und genetische Marker sein. Der vorliegende Artikel gibt einen Überblick über bewährte und innovative Marker.