1
|
Henry NR, Warner MA, Hanson AC, Schulte PJ, Warner NS. Patterns and Outcomes of Opioid Use Before and After Hospitalization for Critical Illness: A Population-Based Cohort Study. J Intensive Care Med 2024:8850666241268473. [PMID: 39105427 DOI: 10.1177/08850666241268473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
Background: Hospitalization represents a major access point for prescription opioids, yet little is known regarding patterns and outcomes of opioid exposures before and after hospitalization for critical illness. Methods: This is an observational, population-based cohort study of adults (≥18 years) hospitalized for critical illness from 2010 to 2019. Multivariable models assess associations between opioid exposures prior to hospitalization, classified according to the Consortium to Study Opioid Risks and Trends, and posthospitalization opioid exposures and clinical outcomes through 1-year posthospitalization. Results: Of 11 496 patients, 6318 (55%) were men with a median age of 66 (51, 79) years and 40% (n = 4623) surgical admissions. Prehospitalization opioid availability included 8449 (73%) none, 2117 (18%) short-term, 471 (4%) episodic, and 459 (4%) long-term. Thirty-nine percent (4144/10 708) of hospital survivors were discharged with opioids, with higher prescribing rates for surgical admissions (55%). Greater preadmission opioid exposures were associated with higher prevalent opioid availability at 1 year (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 24.1 [18.3-31.8], 9.42 [7.18-12.3], and 2.55 [2.08-3.12] for long-term, episodic, and short-term exposures, respectively, vs none, P < .001). Greater preadmission opioid exposures were associated with longer hospitalizations (1.13 [1.04-1.23], 1.15 [1.06-1.25], and 1.08 [1.04-1.13] multiplicative increase in geometric mean, P < .001), more readmissions (hazard ratio [HR] 2.08 [1.74-2.49], 1.88 [1.56-2.26], and 1.48 [1.33-1.64], P < .001), and higher 1-year mortality (HR 1.59 [1.28-1.98], 1.75 [1.41-2.18], and 1.49 [1.32-1.69], P < .001). Similar associations were observed across surgical and nonsurgical admissions. Conclusions: Prehospitalization opioid exposures in survivors of critical illness are associated with clinical outcomes through 1 year and may serve as important prognostic markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole R Henry
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew A Warner
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrew C Hanson
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Phillip J Schulte
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nafisseh S Warner
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pohl NB, Narayanan R, Lee Y, McCurdy MA, Carter MV, Hoffman E, Fras SI, Vo M, Kaye ID, Mangan JJ, Kurd MF, Canseco JA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK. Postoperative opioid consumption patterns diverge between propensity matched patients undergoing traumatic and elective cervical spine fusion. Spine J 2024:S1529-9430(24)00278-X. [PMID: 38880487 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Prolonged opioid therapy following spine surgery is an ongoing postoperative concern. While prior studies have investigated postoperative opioid use patterns in the elective cervical surgery patient population, to our knowledge, opioid use patterns in patients undergoing surgery for traumatic cervical spine injuries have not been elucidated. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare opioid use and prescription patterns in the postoperative pain management of patients undergoing traumatic and elective cervical spine fusion surgery. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Adult patients with traumatic cervical injuries who underwent primary anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) during their initial hospital admission. The propensity matched, control group consisted of adult elective cervical fusion patients who underwent primary ACDF or PCDF. OUTCOME MEASURES Demographic data, surgical characteristics, spinal disease diagnosis, location of cervical injury, procedure type, operative levels fused, and Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) data. PDMP data included the number of opioid prescriptions filled, preoperative opioid use, postoperative opioid use, and use of perioperative benzodiazepines, muscle relaxants, or gabapentin. Opioid consumption data was collected in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and standardized per day. METHODS A 1:1 propensity match was performed to match traumatic injury patients undergoing cervical fusion surgery with elective cervical fusion patients. Traumatic injury patients were matched based on age, sex, CCI, procedure type, and cervical levels fused. Pre- and postoperative opioid, benzodiazepine, muscle relaxant, and gabapentin use were assessed for the traumatic injury and elective patients. T- or Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare continuous data and Chi-Squared or Fisher's Exact were used to compare categorical data. Multivariate stepwise regression using MME per day 0 - 30 days following surgery as the dependent outcome was performed to further evaluate associations with postoperative opioid use. RESULTS A total of 48 patients underwent fusion surgery for a traumatic cervical spine injury and 48 elective cervical fusion with complete PDMP data were assessed. Elective patients were found to fill more prescriptions (3.19 vs. 0.65, p=.023) and take more morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day (0.60 vs. 0.04, p=.014) within 1 year prior to surgery in comparison to traumatic patients. Elective patients were also more likely to use opioids (29.2% vs. 10.4%, p=.040) and take more MMEs per day (0.70 vs. 0.05, p=.004) within 30 days prior to surgery. Within 30 days postoperatively, elective patients used opioids more frequently (89.6% vs. 52.1%, p<.001) and took more MMEs per day (3.73 vs. 1.71, p<.001) than traumatic injury patients. Multivariate stepwise regression demonstrated preoperative opioid use (Estimate: 1.87, p=.013) to be correlated with higher postoperative MME per day within 30 days of surgery. Surgery after traumatic injury was correlated with lower postoperative MME use per day within 30 days of surgery (Estimate: -1.63 p=.022). CONCLUSION Cervical fusion patients with a history of traumatic spine injury consume fewer opioids in the early postoperative period in comparison to elective cervical fusion patients, however both cohorts consumed a similar amount after the initial 30-day postoperative period. Preoperative opioid use was also a risk factor for higher consumption in the short-term postoperative period. These results may aid physicians in further understanding patients' postoperative care needs based on presenting injury characteristics and highlights the need for enhanced follow-up care for traumatic cervical spine injury patients after fusion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas B Pohl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Rajkishen Narayanan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | - Yunsoo Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Michael A McCurdy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Michael V Carter
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Elijah Hoffman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Sebastian I Fras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Michael Vo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Ian David Kaye
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - John J Mangan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Mark F Kurd
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Jose A Canseco
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Alan S Hilibrand
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Alexander R Vaccaro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Gregory D Schroeder
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Christopher K Kepler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Warner NS, Hanson AC, Schulte PJ, Kara F, Reid RI, Schwarz CG, Benarroch EE, Graff-Radford J, Vemuri P, Jack CR, Petersen RC, Warner DO, Mielke MM, Kantarci K. Prescription Opioids and Brain Structure in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Mayo Clin Proc 2024; 99:716-726. [PMID: 38702125 PMCID: PMC11081533 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the associations between prescription opioid exposures in community-dwelling older adults and gray and white matter structure by magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS Secondary analysis was conducted of a prospective, longitudinal population-based cohort study employing cross-sectional imaging of older adult (≥65 years) enrollees between November 1, 2004, and December 31, 2017. Gray matter outcomes included cortical thickness in 41 structures and subcortical volumes in 6 structures. White matter outcomes included fractional anisotropy in 40 tracts and global white matter hyperintensity volumes. The primary exposure was prescription opioid availability expressed as the per-year rate of opioid days preceding magnetic resonance imaging, with a secondary exposure of per-year total morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Multivariable models assessed associations between opioid exposures and brain structures. RESULTS The study included 2185 participants; median (interquartile range) age was 80 (75 to 85) years, 47% were women, and 1246 (57%) received opioids. No significant associations were found between opioids and gray matter. Increased opioid days and MME were associated with decreased white matter fractional anisotropy in 15 (38%) and 16 (40%) regions, respectively, including the corpus callosum, posterior thalamic radiation, and anterior limb of the internal capsule, among others. Opioid days and MME were also associated with greater white matter hyperintensity volume (1.02 [95% CI, 1.002 to 1.036; P=.029] and 1.01 [1.001 to 1.024; P=.032] increase in the geometric mean, respectively). CONCLUSION The duration and dose of prescription opioids were associated with decreased white matter integrity but not with gray matter structure. Future studies with longitudinal imaging and clinical correlation are warranted to further evaluate these relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nafisseh S Warner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - Andrew C Hanson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Firat Kara
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David O Warner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Michelle M Mielke
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patel TD, McNicholas MN, Paschell PA, Arnold PM, Lee CT. Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane (TLIP) block verses other paraspinal fascial plane blocks and local infiltration for enhanced pain control after spine surgery: a systematic review. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:122. [PMID: 38539065 PMCID: PMC10976846 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02500-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Spinal surgeries are accompanied by excessive pain due to extensive dissection and muscle retraction during the procedure. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) blocks for spinal surgeries are a recent addition to regional anesthesia to improve postoperative pain management. When performing a classical TLIP (cTLIP) block, anesthetics are injected between the muscle (m.) multifidus and m. longissimus. During a modified TLIP (mTLIP) block, anesthetics are injected between the m. longissimus and m. iliocostalis instead. Our systematic review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of TLIP blocks in improving postoperative outcomes in spinal surgery through an analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).We conducted a systematic review based on the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria required studies to be RCTs in English that used TLIP blocks during spinal surgery and report both outcome measures. Outcome data includes postoperative opioid consumption and pain.A total of 17 RCTs were included. The use of a TLIP block significantly decreases postoperative opioid use and pain compared to using general anesthesia (GA) plus 0.9% saline with no increase in complications. There were mixed outcomes when compared against wound infiltration with local anesthesia. When compared with erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB), TLIP blocks often decreased analgesic use, however, this did not always translate to decreased pain. The cTLIP and mTLP block methods had comparable postoperative outcomes but the mTLIP block had a significantly higher percentage of one-time block success.The accumulation of the current literature demonstrates that TLIP blocks are superior to non-block procedures in terms of analgesia requirements and reported pain throughout the hospitalization in patients who underwent spinal surgery. The various levels of success seen with wound infiltration and ESPB could be due to the nature of the different spinal procedures. For example, studies that saw superiority with TLIP blocks included fusion surgeries which is a more invasive procedure resulting in increased postoperative pain compared to discectomies.The results of our systematic review include moderate-quality evidence that show TLIP blocks provide effective pain control after spinal surgery. Although, the application of mTLIP blocks is more successful, more studies are needed to confirm that superiority of mTLIP over cTLIP blocks. Additionally, further high-quality research is needed to verify the potential benefit of TLIP blocks as a common practice for spinal surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Paul M Arnold
- Carle Neuroscience Institute, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Cheng-Ting Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology, Carle Foundation Hospital Urbana, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim D, Lee YJ, Jang BH, Park JS, Park S, D'Adamo CR, Shin YC, Ko SG. Analysis of factors associated with the use of Korean medicine after spinal surgery using a nationwide database in Korea. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20177. [PMID: 37978330 PMCID: PMC10656548 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47454-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Many patients in Korea use Korean Medicine (KM) after spine surgery, but related research is lacking. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study aimed to analyze factors affecting the use and costs of KM using nationally representative data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort, South Korea. Patients who underwent spinal surgery for spinal diseases from 2011 to 2014 were followed up for 5 years, and their medical care was described. The association between patient and spinal surgery characteristics and the use of KM was analyzed. A two-part model was used to analyze factors affecting the use of KM in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Of 11,802 patients who underwent spinal surgery, 11,367 who met the inclusion criteria were included. Overall, 55.5% were female, 32.3% were aged ≥ 70 years, and 50.2% received KM treatment during the follow-up period. Open discectomy was the most common surgical procedure performed (58.6%), and 40.2% of surgeries were performed because of lumbar disc disorder. Female sex, older age, high Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and use of KM before surgery were associated with increased KM use and expenditure after surgery. In conclusion, patient characteristics, rather than surgical characteristics, appeared to be more strongly associated with the use of KM after surgery, particularly prior experience with KM use. This study is significant in that it analyzed the entire spine surgery to provide a comprehensive view of the use of KM after spine surgery and analyzed the impact of various factors related patients and surgical characteristics on KM use. The results of this study may be useful to patients with spinal diseases, clinicians, and policymakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doori Kim
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea
- Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, 540 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06110, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Jae Lee
- Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, 540 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06110, Republic of Korea
| | - Bo-Hyoung Jang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jeong-Su Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Semyung University, 65, Semyeong-ro, Jecheon-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunju Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, 62, Daehak-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon, 34520, Republic of Korea
| | - Christopher R D'Adamo
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Yong Cheol Shin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong-Gyu Ko
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bakr O, Soufi K, Jones Q, Bautista B, Van B, Booze Z, Martin AR, Klineberg EO, Le H, Ebinu JO, Kim KD, Javidan Y, Roberto RF. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for treating multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2023; 15:100232. [PMID: 37416091 PMCID: PMC10320595 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Laminectomy with fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are common posterior decompression procedures used to treat multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). There is debate on their relative efficacy and safety for treatment of DCM. The goal of this study is to examine outcomes and costs of LF and LP procedures for DCM. Methods This is a retrospective review of adult patients (<18) at a single center who underwent elective LP and LF of at least 3 levels from C3-C7. Outcome measures included operative characteristics, inpatient mobility status, length of stay, complications, revision surgery, VAS neck pain scores, and changes in radiographic alignment. Oral opioid analgesic needs and hospital cost comparison were also assessed. Results LP cohort (n=76) and LF cohort (n=59) reported no difference in neck pain at baseline, 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively (p>.05). Patients were successfully weaned off opioids at similar rates (LF: 88%, LP: 86%). Fixed and variable costs respectively with LF cases hospital were higher, 15.7% and 25.7% compared to LP cases (p=.03 and p<.001). LF has a longer length of stay (4.2 vs. 3.1 days, p=.001). Wound-related complications were 5 times more likely after LF (13.6% vs. 5.9%, RR: 5.15) and C5 palsy rates were similar across the groups (LF: 11.9% LP: 5.6% RR: 1.8). Ground-level falls requiring an emergency department visit were more likely after LF (11.9% vs. 2.6%, p=.04). Conclusions When treating multilevel DCM, LP has similar rates of new or increasing axial neck pain compared to LF. LF was associated with greater hospital costs, length of stay, and complications compared to LP. LP may in fact be a less morbid and more cost-effective alternative to LF for patients without cervical deformity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oussama Bakr
- School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Khadija Soufi
- School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Quincy Jones
- School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Barry Bautista
- School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin Van
- School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Zachary Booze
- School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Allan R. Martin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Eric O. Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Hai Le
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Julius O. Ebinu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Kee D. Kim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Yashar Javidan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Rolando F. Roberto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tsai SHL, Hu CW, El Sammak S, Durrani S, Ghaith AK, Lin CCJ, Krzyż EZ, Bydon M, Fu TS, Lin TY. Different Gabapentin and Pregabalin Dosages for Perioperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2328121. [PMID: 37556139 PMCID: PMC10413173 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patients undergoing spine surgery often experience severe pain. The optimal dosage of pregabalin and gabapentin for pain control and safety in these patients has not been well established. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the associations of pain, opioid consumption, and adverse events with different dosages of pregabalin and gabapentin in patients undergoing spine surgery. DATA SOURCES PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Scopus databases were searched for articles until August 7, 2021. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials conducted among patients who received pregabalin or gabapentin while undergoing spine surgery were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two investigators independently performed data extraction following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) reporting guideline. The network meta-analysis was conducted from August 2022 to February 2023 using a random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and secondary outcomes included opioid consumption and adverse events. RESULTS Twenty-seven randomized clinical trials with 1861 patients (median age, 45.99 years [range, 20.00-70.00 years]; 759 women [40.8%]) were included in the systematic review and network meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, the VAS pain score was lowest with gabapentin 900 mg per day, followed by gabapentin 1200 mg per day, gabapentin 600 mg per day, gabapentin 300 mg per day, pregabalin 300 mg per day, pregabalin 150 mg per day, and pregabalin 75 mg per day. Additionally, gabapentin 900 mg per day was found to be associated with the lowest opioid consumption among all dosages of gabapentin and pregabalin, with a mean difference of -22.07% (95% CI, -33.22% to -10.92%) for the surface under the cumulative ranking curve compared with placebo. There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events (nausea, vomiting, and dizziness) among all treatments. No substantial inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence was detected for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that gabapentin 900 mg per day before spine surgery is associated with the lowest VAS pain score among all dosages. In addition, no differences in adverse events were noted among all treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Huang Laurent Tsai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Branch, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Wei Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Branch, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Sally El Sammak
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sulaman Durrani
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Abdul Karim Ghaith
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Che Chung Justin Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Branch, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ewa Zuzanna Krzyż
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Tsai Sheng Fu
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taiwan
| | - Tung Yi Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Branch, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bhenderu LS, Lyon KA, Soto JM, Richardson W, Desai R, Rahm M, Huang JH. Ropivacaine-Epinephrine-Clonidine-Ketorolac Cocktail as a Local Anesthetic for Lumbar Decompression Surgery: A Single Institutional Experience. World Neurosurg 2023; 176:e515-e520. [PMID: 37263493 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study is to discuss our initial experience with a multimodal opioid-sparing cocktail containing ropivacaine, epinephrine, clonidine, and ketorolac (RECK) in the postoperative management of lumbar decompression surgeries. METHODS Patients were either administered no local anesthetic at the incision site or were administered a weight-based amount of RECK into the paraspinal musculature and subdermal space surrounding the operative site once the fascia was closed. We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients 18 years of age or older undergoing lumbar laminectomy and lumbar diskectomy surgeries between December 2019 and April 2021. Outcomes including total opioid use, measured as morphine milligram equivalent, length of stay, and postoperative visual analog scores for pain, were collected. Relationships between variables were analyzed with Student's t-test, chi-square tests, and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS A total of 121 patients undergoing 52 lumbar laminectomy and 69 lumbar diskectomy surgeries were identified. For lumbar laminectomy, patients who were administered RECK had decreased opioid use in the postoperative period (11.47 ± 12.32 vs. 78.51 ± 106.10 morphine milligram equivalents, P = 0.019). For patients undergoing lumbar diskectomies, RECK administration led to a shorter length of stay (0.17 ± 0.51 vs. 0.79 ± 1.45 days, P = 0.019) and a lower 2-hour postoperative pain score (3.69 ± 2.56 vs. 5.41 ± 2.28, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS The RECK cocktail has potential to be an effective therapeutic option for the postoperative management of lumbar decompression surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lokeshwar S Bhenderu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, Texas, USA.
| | - Kristopher A Lyon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Jose M Soto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - William Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Ronak Desai
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Mark Rahm
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Jason H Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Persistent Use of Prescription Opioids Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: Observational Study with Prospectively Collected Data From Two Norwegian Nationwide Registries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:607-614. [PMID: 34798646 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Prospective pharmacoepidemiological study. OBJECTIVE To investigate the use of prescription opioids 2 years following degenerative lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There are limited data providing details to evaluate patterns of opioid use. The number of patients is often limited and data on opioid use following some of the most common surgical procedures are lacking. METHODS Data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery and the Norwegian Prescription Database were linked on an individual level. The primary outcome measure was persistent opioid use the second year after surgery. Functional disabilitywas measured with the Oswestry disability index (ODI). Study participants were operated between 2007 and 2017. RESULTS Among 32,886 study participants, 2754 (8.4%) met criteria for persistent opioid use the second year after surgery. Among persistent opioid users in the second year after surgery, 64% met the criteria for persistent opioid use the year preceding surgery. Persistent opioid use the year preceding surgery (odds ratio [OR] 31.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 26.9-36.0, P = 0.001), use of high doses of benzodiazepines (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.30-2.04, P = 0.001), and use of high doses of z-hypnotics (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.58-2.22, P = 0.001) the year before surgery were associated with increased risk of persistent opioid use the second year after surgery. A higher ODI score at 1 year was observed in persistent opioid users compared with non-persistent users (41.5 vs. 18.8 points) and there was a significant difference in ODI change (-13.7 points). Patients with persistent opioid use in the year preceding surgery were less likely to achieve a minimal clinically important ODI change at 1 year compared with non-persistent users (37.7% vs. 52.6%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients with or at risk of developing persistent opioid should be identified and provided counseling and support to taper off opioid treatment.Level of Evidence: 2.
Collapse
|
10
|
Perioperative Opioid Consumption and Clinical Outcomes in Surgical Patients With a Pre-existing Opioid-Based Intrathecal Drug Delivery System. Anesth Analg 2022; 134:35-43. [PMID: 34260427 PMCID: PMC8678135 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) have been utilized for over 3 decades for management of chronic pain and spasticity. Patients with IDDS may present for surgical procedures unrelated to the IDDS device, although data are limited regarding perioperative outcomes. METHODS This is a historical matched cohort study conducted between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016 of patients with an opioid-based IDDS versus matched control patients undergoing surgery excluding interventional pain procedures. Patients in the IDDS group were matched with up to 2 patients without an IDDS. Multivariable regression analyses were utilized to assess differences in the primary outcome of cumulative perioperative opioid consumption (ie, intraoperative and postanesthesia care unit [PACU] opioid consumption), and opioid consumption during the first 24 and 72 postoperative hours. Postoperative clinical outcomes were also assessed including escalating oxygen requirements, naloxone administration, pain-sedation mismatch, and perioperative pain service consultation. RESULTS A total of 321 surgeries were included, 112 with IDDS and 209 controls, with median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 57 (49-64) years. Compared to matched controls, patients with an IDDS had greater perioperative opioid consumption (median [IQR] oral morphine milligram equivalents [OME] of 110 [60-163] vs 93 [IQR, 53-142]; adjusted multiplicative increase 1.28 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.03-1.59]; P = .026). IDDS patients also had greater opioid consumption in the first 24 and 72 postoperative hours (multiplicative increases of 2.23 [95% CI, 1.36-3.63], P = .001, and 2.46 [95% CI, 1.41-4.32], P = .002, respectively). There were no significant differences in postoperative oxygen requirements, naloxone administration, or pain-sedation mismatch. Inpatient pain medicine consultation was more frequent in IDDS patients compared to controls (51.8% vs 6.2%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Patients with opioid-based IDDS received more perioperative opioids and were more likely to receive postoperative pain service consultation compared to matched controls. There were no significant differences in clinical safety outcomes, suggesting tolerance for higher opioid doses. Further research is warranted to optimize perioperative outcomes in those with IDDS.
Collapse
|
11
|
Berardino K, Carroll AH, Kaneb A, Civilette MD, Sherman WF, Kaye AD. An Update on Postoperative Opioid Use and Alternative Pain Control Following Spine Surgery. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2021; 13:24978. [PMID: 34745473 DOI: 10.52965/001c.24978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Opioids are commonly prescribed postoperatively for pain control, especially in spine surgery. Not only does this pose concerns for potential abuse, but it also has been shown to worsen certain outcomes. Risk factors for increased use include preoperative opioid use, female sex, psychiatric diagnoses, and drug and alcohol use. Over the past few decades, there have been increasing efforts mostly spearheaded by governmental agencies to decrease postoperative opioid use via opioid prescription limitation laws regulating the number of days and amounts of analgesics prescribed and promotion of the use of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, multimodal pain regimens, epidural catheters, and ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks. These strategies collectively have been efficacious in decreasing overall opioid use and better controlling patients' postoperative pain while simultaneously improving other outcomes such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, and length of stay. With an aging population undergoing an increasing number of spinal surgeries each year, it is now more important than ever to continue these efforts to improve the quality and safety of pain control methods after spinal surgery and limit the transition of acute management to the development of opioid dependence and addiction long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alicia Kaneb
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington D.C
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sundararajan K, Ajrawat P, Canizares M, Power JD, Perruccio AV, Sarro A, Montoya L, Rampersaud YR. The potential for diversion of prescribed opioids among orthopaedic patients: Results of an anonymous patient survey. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0256741. [PMID: 34437639 PMCID: PMC8389484 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diversion of prescription opioid medication is a contributor to the opioid epidemic. Safe handling practices can reduce the risk of diversion. We aimed to understand: 1) if orthopaedic patients received instructions on how to safely handle opioids, 2) their typical storage/disposal practices, and 3) their willingness to participate in an opioid disposal program (ODP). METHODS Cross-sectional study of adult orthopaedic patients who completed an anonymous survey on current or past prescription opioid use, instruction on handling, storage and disposal practices, presence of children in the household, and willingness to participate in an ODP. Frequencies and percentages of responses were computed, both overall and stratified by possession of unused opioids. RESULTS 569 respondents who reported either current or past prescription opioid use were analyzed. 44% reported receiving storage instructions and 56% reported receiving disposal instructions from a health care provider. Many respondents indicated unsafe handling practices: possessing unused opioids (34%), using unsafe storage methods (90%), and using unsafe disposal methods (34%). Respondents with unused opioids were less likely to report receiving handling instructions or using safe handling methods, and 47% of this group reported having minors or young adults in the household. Respondents who received storage and disposal instructions were more likely to report safe storage and disposal methods. Seventy-four percent of respondents reported that they would participate in an ODP. CONCLUSION While many orthopaedic patients report inadequate education on safe opioid handling and using unsafe handling practices, findings suggest targeted education is associated with better behaviours. However, patients are willing to safely dispose of unused medication if provided a convenient option. These findings suggest a need to address patient knowledge and behavior regarding opioid handling to reduce the risk of opioid diversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kala Sundararajan
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Prabjit Ajrawat
- Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mayilee Canizares
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Denise Power
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony V Perruccio
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Sarro
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Luis Montoya
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Y Raja Rampersaud
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- Bhiken I Naik
- Department of Anesthesiology and Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| |
Collapse
|