1
|
Gibbons C, Brown G, Lu SC, Elrick A, Tang Y, Kaufman M, Williams M, Xu C, Harrison C, Swisher C. Introduction and validation of the open symptom framework: a public domain modular framework for patient-reported measurement of symptoms related to cancer and its treatment. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:2349-2358. [PMID: 39023734 PMCID: PMC11390769 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03656-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We provide an initial description and validation of some public domain patient-reported outcome (PRO) items to assess cancer symptom burden to address immediate barriers to symptom assessment use in clinical practice and facilitate future research. METHODS We created the Open Symptom Framework (OSF), a flexible tool for clinical cancer-related symptom assessment. The items comprise six components: recall period, concept, symptom, qualifier(s), a definition, and a 5-point Likert-type response. We recruited patients receiving cancer therapy in the United States and United Kingdom. We assessed external construct validity by comparing OSF scores to the PRO-CTCAE measure and assessed reliability, scalability, dimensionality, and item ordering within a non-parametric item response theory framework. We tested differential item functioning for country, age, gender, and level of education. RESULTS We developed a framework alongside clinical and psychometric experts and debrieifed with 10 patients. For validation, we recruited 331patients. All items correlated with the PRO-CTCAE equivalents (r = 0.55-0.96, all p < 0.01). Mokken analysis confirmed the scalability and unidimensionality of all symptom scales with multiple items at the scale (Ho = 0.61-0.75) and item level (Hi = 0.60-0.76). Items are interpreted consistently between demographic groups (Crit = 0 for all groups). CONCLUSION The public domain OSF has excellent psychometric properties including face, content, and criterion validity and can facilitate the development of flexible, robust measurements to fulfil stakeholder need. The OSF was designed specifically to support clinical assessment but will function well for research. Further work is planned to increase the number of symptoms and number of questions per symptom within the framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gibbons
- Section of Patient Centered Analytics, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 6565, MD Anderson Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - G Brown
- The Ronin Project Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA
| | - S C Lu
- Section of Patient Centered Analytics, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 6565, MD Anderson Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A Elrick
- The Ronin Project Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA
| | - Y Tang
- The Ronin Project Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA
| | - M Kaufman
- The Ronin Project Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA
| | - M Williams
- The Ronin Project Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA
| | - C Xu
- Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - C Harrison
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - C Swisher
- The Ronin Project Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA
- Ellison Institute of Transformative Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lai-Kwon J, Jefford M, Best S, Zhang I, Rutherford C. Selecting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Side Effects for Real-Time Monitoring in Routine Cancer Care: A Modified Delphi Study. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2400037. [PMID: 39151111 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) symptom monitoring may support the safe delivery of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). There is no consensus on which side effects should be monitored in routine care. We aimed to develop a prioritized list of ICI side effects to include in ePRO systems and compare this to existing ICI-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS We conducted a two-round modified Delphi survey. Participants were patients (or their carers) who had received/were receiving ICI or managing health care professionals (HCPs). Round 1 (R1) side effects were generated from a literature review and existing PROMs. In R1, participants rated the importance of 63 ICI side effects in an ePRO system on a five-point Likert scale. In round 2 (R2), participants ranked the 10 most important side effects from 36 side effects. Content mapping of the prioritized list against existing PROMs was conducted. RESULTS In R1, 47 patients, nine carers, and 58 HCPs responded. Twenty-eight side effects were rated important (I)/very important (VI) by >75% of participants and included in R2. Ten were rated I/VI by <50% of participants and excluded. Twenty-five were rated I/VI by 50%-75% of participants and discussed at an HCP roundtable to determine inclusion in R2. In R2, 39 patients, 11 carers, and 42 HCPs ranked seizures, shortness of breath, chest pain, diarrhea, and rash as the most important side effects for monitoring. Content mapping showed significant differences between the prioritized list and existing PROMs. CONCLUSION We developed a consumer- and clinician-driven prioritized list of 36 ICI side effects to include in future ePRO systems. This process highlights the importance of broad stakeholder engagement in side-effect selection and rigorously identifying clinically important side effects to ensure content validity and clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Iris Zhang
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Sydney Quality of Life Office, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yi L, Zeng X, Zhou Z, Liu Q. Comparison Between Sotorasib with Docetaxel for the Treatment of Chinese Patients with Previously Treated NSCLC with KRASG12C Mutation: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Inform Drug Pricing. Adv Ther 2024; 41:3159-3172. [PMID: 38888881 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02908-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study sought to investigate the affordable price of sotorasib among patients with previously treated advanced KRASG12C-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspectives of both the Chinese healthcare system and the patients. METHODS We developed a Markov model spanning a 20-year time horizon with a cycle length of 21 days. Our data were derived from the CodeBreaK 200 clinical trial, supplemented with published literature, publicly available national databases, and local hospitals. The primary outcomes were the affordable prices of sotorasib which would result in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of sotorasib relative to docetaxel below the preset willing-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model's robustness. RESULTS At the national level, from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system and patients, the price of sotorasib should be lower than US$0.04673 and $0.03231, respectively, to make it affordable, which is equivalent to $1346 and $931 per box (120 mg × 240 pieces). At the provincial level, the price ceiling of sotorasib/mg fluctuated between $0.04084 to $0.08061 from the Chinese healthcare system's perspective and between $0.02642 to $0.06620 from the patients' perspective. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that, as the price of sotorasib decreased, its likelihood of being cost-effective increased. CONCLUSION Sotorasib might be a cost-effective therapy in China. The pharmaco-economic evidence generated from this study has significant implications not only for guiding the drug pricing of the upcoming sotorasib but also for determining the reimbursement ratio for its potential inclusion in the National Reimbursement Drugs List in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidan Yi
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410000, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaohui Zeng
- PET-CT Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhen Zhou
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Qiao Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410000, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yi L, Zhou Z, Zeng X, Tan C, Liu Q. First-line treatments for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy: a China-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1408928. [PMID: 39035009 PMCID: PMC11257869 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1408928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the cost-effectiveness of imported immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as atezolizumab and durvalumab, and domestic ICIs like serplulimab and adebrelimab, in combination with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in China. Methods Using a 21-day cycle length and a 20-year time horizon, a Markov model was established to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of five first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, as well as against each other, from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Transition probabilities were estimated by combining the results of the CAPSTONE-1 trial and a published network meta-analysis. Cost and health state utilities were collected from multiple sources. Both cost and effectiveness outcomes were discounted at a rate of 5% annually. The primary model output was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A series of sensitivity analyses were preformed to assess the robustness of the model. Results In the base-case analysis, the addition of first-line ICIs to chemotherapy resulted in the ICERs ranged from $80,425.31/QALY to $812,415.46/QALY, which exceeded the willing-to-pay threshold set for the model. When comparing these first-line immunochemotherapy strategies, serplulimab plus chemotherapy had the highest QALYs of 1.51286 and the second lowest costs of $60,519.52, making it is the most cost-effective strategy. Our subgroup-level analysis yielded results that are consistent with the base-case analysis. The sensitivity analysis results confirmed the validity and reliability of the model. Conclusion In China, the combination of fist-line ICIs plus chemotherapy were not considered cost-effective when compared to chemotherapy alone. However, when these fist-line immunochemotherapy strategies were compared with each other, first-line serplulimab plus chemotherapy consistently demonstrated superiority in terms of cost-effectiveness. Reducing the cost of serplulimab per 4.5 mg/kg would be a realistic step towards making first-line serplulimab plus chemotherapy more accessible and cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidan Yi
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhen Zhou
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Xiaohui Zeng
- Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT) Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chongqing Tan
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qiao Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lai-Kwon J, Thorner E, Rutherford C, Crossnohere N, Brundage M. Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into the Care of People With Advanced Cancer-A Practical Guide. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e438512. [PMID: 38788184 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_438512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are being increasingly integrated into routine clinical practice to enhance individual patient care. This has been driven by recognition of the benefits of PROs in enhancing symptom management, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and overall survival, and reductions in acute health care utilization. These benefits are reflected in the emergence of value-based health care initiatives incorporating PRO symptom monitoring such as the Enhancing Oncology Model in the United States. However, implementing PROs can be challenging and it can be difficult to know where to begin to select appropriate PROs, and effectively display and appropriately interpret PRO data. This manuscript summarizes an educational session at the 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting, which provided practical guidance to clinicians seeking to incorporate PROs into the care of people with advanced cancer. We focus on why it is important to collect PROs in routine care from a patient's perspective, how to select PROs for symptom monitoring (including using static patient-reported outcome measures and newer item libraries), and highlight key pearls and pitfalls in the display and interpretation of PROs. We highlight the breadth of existing resources available to guide clinicians in PRO implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Claudia Rutherford
- Sydney Quality of Life Office, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Michael Brundage
- Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mbilinyi RH, Msaouel P, Rao P, Karam JA, Tannir NM, Tang C. Radiation Therapy for the Management of Renal Medullary Carcinoma: A Multi-Case Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024:102065. [PMID: 38556389 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H Mbilinyi
- Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Medical Education, Texas A&M School of Medicine, Bryan, TX
| | - Pavlos Msaouel
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Priya Rao
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lai-Kwon J, Rutherford C, Jefford M, Gore C, Best S. Using Implementation Science Frameworks to Guide the Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Symptom Monitoring in Routine Cancer Care. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:335-349. [PMID: 38206290 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) are an evidence-based means of detecting symptoms earlier and improving patient outcomes. However, there are few examples of successful implementation in routine cancer care. We conducted a qualitative study to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing ePRO symptom monitoring in routine cancer care using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). METHODS Participants were adult patients with cancer, their caregivers, or health care professionals involved in ePRO monitoring or processes. Focus groups or individual interviews were conducted using a semistructured approach informed by the CFIR. Data were analyzed deductively using the CFIR. Barriers were matched to theory-informed implementation strategies using the CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) matching tool. RESULTS Thirty participants were interviewed: 22 females (73%), aged 31-70 years (28, 94%), comprising patients (n = 8), caregivers (n = 2), medical oncologists (n = 4), nurses (n = 4), hospital leaders (n = 6), clinic administrators (n = 2), pharmacists (n = 2), and information technology specialists (n = 2). Barriers pertaining to four CFIR domains were identified and several were novel, including the challenge of adapting ePROs for different anticancer treatments. Facilitators pertaining to all CFIR domains were identified, such as leveraging acceptability of remote care post-COVID-19 to drive implementation. Conducting consensus discussions with stakeholders to tailor ePROs to the local setting, identifying/preparing individual and group-level champions, and assessing readiness for change (including leveraging technological advances and increased confidence in using remote monitoring post-COVID-19) were the most frequently recommended implementation strategies. CONCLUSION The CFIR facilitated identification of known and novel barriers and facilitators to implementing ePRO symptom monitoring in routine cancer care. Implementation strategies summarized in a conceptual framework will be used to codesign an ePRO symptom monitoring system for immunotherapy side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Cancer Care Research Unit (CCRU), Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claire Gore
- Department of Psychology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Psychology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang Y, Allsop MJ, Epstein JB, Howell D, Rapoport BL, Schofield P, Van Sebille Y, Thong MSY, Walraven I, Ryan Wolf J, van den Hurk CJG. Patient-reported symptom monitoring: using (big) data to improve supportive care at the macro-, meso-, and micro-levels. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:182. [PMID: 38386101 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08373-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the need for continued development of symptom monitoring (SM) implementation, utilization, and data usage at the macro-, meso-, and micro-levels. METHODS Discussions from a patient-reported SM workshop at the MASCC/ISSO 2022 annual meeting were analyzed using a macro-meso-micro analytical framework of cancer care delivery. The workshop categories "initiation and implementation, barriers to adoption and utilization, and data usage" were integrated for each level. RESULTS At the macro-level, policy development could encourage data sharing and international collaboration, including the exchange of SM methods, supportive care models, and self-management modules. At the meso-level, institutions should adjust clinical workflow and service delivery and promote a thorough technical and clinical integration of SM. At the micro-level, SM should be individualized, with timely feedback for patients, and should foster trust and understanding of AI decision support tools amongst clinicians to improve supportive care. CONCLUSIONS The workshop reached a consensus among international experts on providing guidance on SM implementation, utilization, and (big) data usage pathways in cancer survivors across the cancer continuum and on macro-meso-micro levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Wang
- Department of Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
- Mckinsey & Company, 1 PPG Pl # 2350, Pittsburgh, PA, 15222, USA
| | - Matthew J Allsop
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, 6 Clarendon Way, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9LH, UK
| | - Joel B Epstein
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd., Pavilion, 7th Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Doris Howell
- Princess Margaret Cancer Research Institute, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Bernardo L Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, 129 Oxford Road, Saxonwold, Johannesburg, 2196, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Corner Doctor Savage Road and Bophelo Road, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology, and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute Swinburne University, John St, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
- Health Services Research and Implementation Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Ysabella Van Sebille
- University of South Australia, 61-68 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Melissa S Y Thong
- Unit of Cancer Survivorship (C071), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Iris Walraven
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Julie Ryan Wolf
- Department of Dermatology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 697, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Corina J G van den Hurk
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Rijnkade 5, 3511, LC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yunis R, Fonda SJ, Aghaee S, Kubo A, Davis SW, Liu R, Neeman E, Oakley-Girvan I. Mobile app activity engagement by cancer patients and their caregivers informs remote monitoring. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3375. [PMID: 38336943 PMCID: PMC10858186 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53373-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Mobile phone applications ("apps") are potentially an effective, low-burden method to collect patient-reported outcomes outside the clinical setting. Using such apps consistently and in a timely way is critical for complete and accurate data capture, but no studies of concurrent reporting by cancer patient-caregiver dyads have been published in the peer-reviewed literature. This study assessed app engagement, defined as adherence, timing, and attrition with two smartphone applications, one for adult cancer patients and one for their informal caregivers. This was a single-arm, pilot study in which adult cancer patients undergoing IV chemotherapy or immunotherapy used the DigiBioMarC app, and their caregivers used the TOGETHERCare app, for approximately one month to report weekly on the patients' symptoms and wellbeing. Using app timestamp metadata, we assessed user adherence, overall and by participant characteristics. Fifty patient-caregiver dyads completed the study. Within the one-month study period, both adult cancer patients and their informal caregivers were highly adherent, with app activity completion at 86% for cancer patients and 84% for caregivers. Caregivers completed 86% of symptom reports, while cancer patients completed 89% of symptom reports. Cancer patients and their caregivers completed most activities within 48 h of availability on the app. These results suggest that the DigiBioMarC and TOGETHERCare apps can be used to collect patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes data during intensive treatment. From our research, we conclude that metadata from mobile apps can be used to inform clinical teams about study participants' engagement and wellbeing outside the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Yunis
- Strategy and Science Departments, Medable Inc., 525 University Avenue, Suite A70, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, USA
| | | | - Sara Aghaee
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Ai Kubo
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Sharon W Davis
- Strategy and Science Departments, Medable Inc., 525 University Avenue, Suite A70, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, USA
| | - Raymond Liu
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elad Neeman
- San Rafael Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Rafael, CA, USA
| | - Ingrid Oakley-Girvan
- Strategy and Science Departments, Medable Inc., 525 University Avenue, Suite A70, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Oakley-Girvan I, Yunis R, Fonda SJ, Longmire M, Veuthey TL, Shieh J, Aghaee S, Kubo A, Davis SW, Liu R, Neeman E. Correlation Between Remote Symptom Reporting by Caregivers and Adverse Clinical Outcomes: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e49100. [PMID: 37988151 PMCID: PMC10698661 DOI: 10.2196/49100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) decreases emergency department visits and hospitalizations and increases survival. However, little is known about the outcome predictivity of unpaid informal caregivers' reporting using similar clinical outcome assessments. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to assess whether caregivers and adults with cancer adhered to a planned schedule for electronically collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and if PROs were associated with future clinical events. METHODS We developed 2 iPhone apps to collect PROs, one for patients with cancer and another for caregivers. We enrolled 52 patient-caregiver dyads from Kaiser Permanente Northern California in a nonrandomized study. Participants used the apps independently for 4 weeks. Specific clinical events were obtained from the patients' electronic health records up to 6 months following the study. We used logistic and quasi-Poisson regression analyses to test associations between PROs and clinical events. RESULTS Participants completed 97% (251/260) of the planned Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) surveys and 98% (254/260) of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys. PRO-CTCAE surveys completed by caregivers were associated with patients' hospitalizations or emergency department visits, grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events, dose reductions (P<.05), and hospice referrals (P=.03). PROMIS surveys completed by caregivers were associated with hospice referrals (P=.02). PRO-CTCAE surveys completed by patients were not associated with any clinical events, but their baseline PROMIS surveys were associated with mortality (P=.03), while their antecedent or final PROMIS surveys were associated with all clinical events examined except for total days of treatment breaks. CONCLUSIONS In this study, caregivers and patients completed PROs using smartphone apps as requested. The association of caregiver PRO-CTCAE surveys with patient clinical events suggests that this is a feasible approach to reducing patient burden in clinical trial data collection and may help provide early information about increasing symptom severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Reem Yunis
- Medable Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | | | | | - Tess L Veuthey
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jennifer Shieh
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Sara Aghaee
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
| | - Ai Kubo
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
| | | | - Raymond Liu
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Elad Neeman
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Rafael, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
da Silva Lopes AM, Colomer-Lahiguera S, Darnac C, Giacomini S, Bugeia S, Gutknecht G, Spurrier-Bernard G, Cuendet M, Muet F, Aedo-Lopez V, Mederos N, Michielin O, Addeo A, Latifyan S, Eicher M. Testing a Model of Care for Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e48386. [PMID: 37851498 PMCID: PMC10620631 DOI: 10.2196/48386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of severe symptomatic immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be facilitated by timely detection. As patients face a heterogeneous set of symptoms outside the clinical setting, remotely monitoring and assessing symptoms by using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may result in shorter delays between symptom onset and clinician detection. OBJECTIVE We assess the effect of a model of care for remote patient monitoring and symptom management based on PRO data on the time to detection of symptomatic IrAEs from symptom onset. The secondary objectives are to assess its effects on the time between symptomatic IrAE detection and intervention, IrAE grade (severity), health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and overall survival at 6 months. METHODS For this study, 198 patients with cancer receiving systemic treatment comprising ICIs exclusively will be recruited from 2 Swiss university hospitals. Patients are randomized (1:1) to a digital model of care (intervention) or usual care (control group). Patients are enrolled for 6 months, and they use an electronic app to complete weekly Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire and PROMIS (PROs Measurement Information System) Self-Efficacy to Manage Symptoms questionnaires. The intervention patient group completes a standard set of 37 items in a weekly PROs version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) questionnaire, and active symptoms are reassessed daily for the first 3 months by using a modified 24-hour recall period. Patients can add items from the full PRO-CTCAE item library to their questionnaire. Nurses call patients in the event of new or worsening symptoms and manage them by using a standardized triage algorithm based on the United Kingdom Oncology Nursing Society 24-hour triage tool. This algorithm provides guidance on deciding if patients should receive in-person care, if monitoring should be increased, or if self-management education should be reinforced. RESULTS The Institut Suisse de Recherche Expérimentale sur le Cancer Foundation and Kaiku Health Ltd funded this study. Active recruitment began since November 2021 and is projected to conclude in November 2023. Trial results are expected to be published in the first quarter of 2024 and will be disseminated through publications submitted at international scientific conferences. CONCLUSIONS This trial is among the first trials to use PRO data to directly influence routine care of patients treated with ICIs and addresses some limitations in previous studies. This trial collects a wider spectrum of self-reported symptom data daily. There are some methodological limitations brought by changes in evolving treatment standards for patients with cancer. This trial's results could entail further academic discussions on the challenges of diagnosing and managing symptoms associated with treatment remotely by providing further insights into the burden symptoms represent to patients and highlight the complexity of care procedures involved in managing symptomatic IrAEs. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05530187; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05530187. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/48386.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Manuel da Silva Lopes
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sara Colomer-Lahiguera
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Célia Darnac
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stellio Giacomini
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sébastien Bugeia
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Garance Gutknecht
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Michel Cuendet
- Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Fanny Muet
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Nuria Mederos
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Michielin
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alfredo Addeo
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sofiya Latifyan
- Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Manuela Eicher
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zou D, Wang X, Sun Y, Wang X, Lu C, Wang A, Wang X, Yang Y. Arthralgia adverse events due to immune-checkpoint inhibitors for lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1258287. [PMID: 37841432 PMCID: PMC10576430 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1258287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Immune agents targeting Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) are a new type of cancer treatment drugs. By inhibiting the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1, the ability of the immune system to attack tumor cells is enhanced. These immune preparations have shown significant efficacy in the treatment of various malignant tumors. However, like other drugs, immune preparations targeting PD-1 may also cause side effects, including arthralgia. Therefore, we conduct a meta-analysis to assess whether immune-checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death-1 in lung cancer patients will lead to arthralgia adverse events. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Medline (Ovid), Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, CKNI, Wang fang, VIP database, Sino Med, and Clinical Trails, to identify relevant studies. The search encompassed articles published up until June 20th, 2023. The primary outcome is adverse events about arthralgia and secondary outcomes are any other related with arthralgia. Data extraction was carried out by two independent individuals, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2.0 was employed to assess the included studies. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. Results 12 studies are included in the meta-analysis. All included studies were determined to have a low risk of random sequence generation bias. The meta-analysis result showed that arthralgia RR = 1.11, 95% CI [0.88, 1.40], I2 = 56%, back pain RR = 1.86, 95% CI [1.07, 3.26], I2 = 84%, myalgia RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.27, 0.88], I2 = 86% and muscular pain RR = 1.97, 95% CI [1.40, 2.77], I2 = 23%. Conclusion The use of targeted inhibitors may lead to an increased incidence of back pain, while potentially reducing the occurrence of myalgia. On the other hand, immune-checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death-1 in lung cancer patients may not cause arthralgia and muscular pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Defang Zou
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Pharmacology and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Materia Medica, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Joint International Research Laboratory of Chinese Medicine and Regenerative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Prevention and Treatment of Tumor, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaoping Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, PLA Strategic Support Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing, China
| | - Yamin Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Wang
- Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Chang Lu
- Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Aiyun Wang
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Pharmacology and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Materia Medica, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Joint International Research Laboratory of Chinese Medicine and Regenerative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Prevention and Treatment of Tumor, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Xia Wang
- Oncology Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Provincial Second Chinese Medicine Hospital), Nanjing, China
| | - Yan Yang
- China Science and Technology Development Center of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lai-Kwon J, Cohen JE, Lisy K, Rutherford C, Girgis A, Basch E, Jefford M. The Feasibility, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Symptom Monitoring for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicities: A Systematic Review. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2023; 7:e2200185. [PMID: 37220322 DOI: 10.1200/cci.22.00185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in routine cancer care will increase the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Systems are needed to support remote monitoring for irAEs. Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) symptom monitoring systems can help monitor and manage symptoms and side effects. We assessed the content and features of ePRO symptom monitoring systems for irAEs, and their feasibility, acceptability, and impact on patient outcomes and health care utilization. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in May 2022 on MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Quantitative and qualitative data relevant to the review questions were extracted and synthesized in tables. RESULTS Seven papers describing five ePRO systems were included. All systems collected PROs between clinic visits. Two of five used validated symptom questionnaires, 3/5 provided prompts to complete questionnaires, 4/5 provided reminders to self-report, and 3/5 provided clinician alerts for severe/worsening side effects. Four of five provided coverage of ≥26/30 irAEs in the ASCO irAE guideline. Feasibility and acceptability were demonstrated with consent rates of 54%-100%, 17%-27% of questionnaires generating alerts, and adherence rates of 74%-75%. One paper showed a reduction in grade 3-4 irAEs, treatment discontinuation, clinic visit duration, and emergency department presentations, while another showed no difference in these outcomes or the rate of steroid use. CONCLUSION There is preliminary evidence of the feasibility and acceptability of ePRO symptom monitoring for irAEs. However, further studies are needed to confirm the impact on ICI-specific outcomes, such as the frequency of grade 3-4 irAEs and duration of immunosuppression. Suggestions for the content and features of future ePRO systems for irAEs are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jordan E Cohen
- Liverpool Hospital, South-Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karolina Lisy
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Sydney Quality of Life Office, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Care Research Unit (CCRU), Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- South-West Sydney Clinical Campuses, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ethan Basch
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Feng LN, He J, Feng LX, Li Y, Li J, Chen C. Symptoms, symptom clusters and associated factors among cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A cross-sectional survey. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2023; 63:102288. [PMID: 36893574 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to explore the symptoms and symptom clusters and analyse associated factors among cancer patients receiving ICI therapy. METHODS We analysed the data of 216 cancer patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy from the internal medicine unit of a university cancer centre in China. Participants were surveyed using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG PS) assessment, the ICI therapy symptom assessment scale, and demographic and disease characteristic questionnaires designed for this study. Exploratory factor analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to analyse the data. RESULTS The most common symptoms in patients with grade 1-2 symptom severity were fatigue (57.4%), itching (34.3%) and cough (33.3%), and those with grade 3-4 symptom severity were rash (7.9%), joint pain (6.9%), muscle soreness (6.5%) and fatigue (6.5%). Four symptom clusters were identified: nonspecific, musculoskeletal, respiratory and cutaneous (the cumulative contribution to the variance was 64.070%). ECOG PS, disease course and gender were significantly associated with the nonspecific symptom cluster (Adj R2 = 14.3). ECOG PS and disease course were significantly associated with the respiratory symptom cluster (Adj R2 = 8.9). ECOG PS, disease course and education level were significantly associated with the musculoskeletal symptom cluster (Adj R2 = 20.2). CONCLUSION Cancer patients receiving ICI therapy experience various symptoms with apparent clustering. The factors associated with symptom clusters included gender, education level, ECOG PS and disease course. These findings would be useful for medical personnel to provide relevant interventions to promote symptom management of ICI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Na Feng
- Department of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jin He
- Department of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
| | - Li Xia Feng
- Nursing Department, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Chen Chen
- Department of Lymphoma, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Using a Weekly Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire to Track Acute Toxicity in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Radiotherapy for Gynecologic Cancers. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:3306-3317. [PMID: 35621660 PMCID: PMC9140006 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29050270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
There are limited patient-reported outcome (PRO) data tracking changes in toxicity in patients actively undergoing radiotherapy. Between 2015−2019, acute toxicity was prospectively measured in 698 patients undergoing a 5-week course of pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic cancers using a weekly PRO questionnaire. Our questionnaire was able detect a pattern of onset and resolution of acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity in 27 out of 32 questions. Logistic regression analysis showed that increasing GI and GU toxicity at week 2 could predict for severe toxicity at week 5. However, due to a low number of severe events, univariate results could not be productively added to a multivariate model. We observed a >70% response rate for all sections of the questionnaire, except for questions on sexual and vaginal health, which had a 13% average response rate. By demonstrating that PRO data can be used to track acute toxicity during radiotherapy, there is a need to further examine how this tool may be implemented in the clinic to provide complex, adaptive care, such as early side effect management, and modifying radiation delivery in real-time.
Collapse
|
16
|
Daly B, Nicholas K, Flynn J, Silva N, Panageas K, Mao JJ, Gazit L, Gorenshteyn D, Sokolowski S, Newman T, Perry C, Wagner I, Zervoudakis A, Salvaggio R, Holland J, Chiu YO, Kuperman GJ, Simon BA, Reidy-Lagunes DL, Perchick W. Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e221078. [PMID: 35244701 PMCID: PMC8897754 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) may have the potential to improve cancer care delivery by enhancing patient quality of life, reducing acute care visits, and extending overall survival. However, the optimal cadence of ePRO assessments is unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine patient response preferences and the clinical value associated with a daily cadence for ePROs for patients receiving antineoplastic treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This quality improvement study of adult patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment assessed a remote monitoring program using ePROs that was developed to manage cancer therapy-related symptoms. ePRO data submitted between October 16, 2018 to February 29, 2020, from a single regional site within the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center network were included. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to January 2022. EXPOSURE While undergoing active treatment, patients received a daily ePRO assessment that, based on patient responses, generated yellow (moderate) or red (severe) symptom alerts that were sent to clinicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcomes assessed included patient response rate, symptom alert frequency, and an analysis of the clinical value of daily ePROs. RESULTS A total of 217 patients (median [range] age, 66 [31-92] years; 103 [47.5%] women and 114 [52.5%] men) initiating antineoplastic therapy at high risk for symptoms were monitored for a median (range) of 91 (2-369) days. Most patients had thoracic (59 patients [27.2%]), head and neck (48 patients [22.1%]), or gastrointestinal (43 patients [19.8%]) malignant neoplasms. Of 14 603 unique symptom assessments completed, 7349 (50.3%) generated red or yellow symptom alerts. Symptoms commonly generating alerts included pain (665 assessments [23.0%]) and functional status (465 assessments [16.1%]). Most assessments (8438 assessments [57.8%]) were completed at home during regular clinic hours (ie, 9 am-5 pm), with higher response rates on weekdays (58.4%; 95% CI, 57.5%-59.5%) than on weekend days (51.3%; 95% CI, 49.5%-53.1%). Importantly, 284 of 630 unique red alerts (45.1%) surfaced without a prior yellow alert for the same symptom within the prior 7 days; symptom severity fluctuated over the course of a week, and symptom assessments generating a red alert were followed by an acute care visit within 7 days 8.7% of the time compared with 2.9% for assessments without a red alert. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that daily ePRO assessments were associated with increased insight into symptom management in patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment and symptom alerts were associated with risk of acute care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby Daly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kevin Nicholas
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jessica Flynn
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nicholas Silva
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Jun J. Mao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lior Gazit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Claire Perry
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Isaac Wagner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Rori Salvaggio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jessie Holland
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yeneat O. Chiu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Brett A. Simon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Wendy Perchick
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|