1
|
Scott AJ, Kennedy EB, Berlin J, Brown G, Chalabi M, Cho MT, Cusnir M, Dorth J, George M, Kachnic LA, Kennecke HF, Loree JM, Morris VK, Perez RO, Smith JJ, Strickland MR, Gholami S. Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:3355-3375. [PMID: 39116386 DOI: 10.1200/jco.24.01160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines.Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance ("Guidance") provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by providers and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature, and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only) for more.PURPOSETo provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians who treat patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.METHODSA systematic review of the literature published from 2013 to 2023 was conducted to identify relevant systematic reviews, phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies where applicable.RESULTSTwelve RCTs, two systematic reviews, and one nonrandomized study met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.RECOMMENDATIONSFollowing assessment with magnetic resonance imaging, for patients with microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair locally advanced rectal cancer, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT; ie chemoradiation [CRT] and chemotherapy) should be offered as initial treatment for patients with tumors located in the lower rectum and/or patients who are at higher risk for local and/or distant metastases. Patients without higher-risk factors may discuss chemotherapy with selective CRT depending on extent of response, TNT, or neoadjuvant long-course CRT or short-course radiation. For patients who are candidates for TNT, the preferred timing for chemotherapy is after radiation, and neoadjuvant long-course CRT is preferred over short-course radiation therapy (RT), however short-course RT may also be a viable treatment option depending on circumstances. Nonoperative management may be discussed as an alternative to total mesorectal excision for patients who have a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. For patients whose tumors are microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient, immunotherapy is recommended.Additional information is available at http://www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Gina Brown
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Myriam Chalabi
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - May T Cho
- University of California Irvine Health, Irvine, CA
| | - Mike Cusnir
- Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami Beach, FL
| | | | - Manju George
- Paltown Development Foundation/COLONTOWN, Crownsville, MD
| | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Columbia University, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Murshed I, Bunjo Z, Seow W, Murshed I, Bedrikovetski S, Thomas M, Sammour T. Economic Evaluation of 'Watch and Wait' Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-16056-4. [PMID: 39181996 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16056-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Owing to multimodal treatment and complex surgery, locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) exerts a large healthcare burden. Watch and wait (W&W) may be cost saving by removing the need for surgery and inpatient care. This systematic review seeks to identify the economic impact of W&W, compared with standard care, in patients achieving a complete clinical response (cCR) following neoadjuvant therapy for LARC. METHODS The PubMed, OVID Medline, OVID Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception to 26 April 2024. All economic evaluations (EEs) that compared W&W with standard care were included. Reporting and methodological quality was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS), BMJ and Philips checklists. Narrative synthesis was performed. Primary and secondary outcomes were (incremental) cost-effectiveness ratios and the net financial cost. RESULTS Of 1548 studies identified, 27 were assessed for full-text eligibility and 12 studies from eight countries (2016-2024) were included. Seven cost-effectiveness analyses (complete EEs) and five cost analyses (partial EEs) utilized model-based (n = 7) or trial-based (n = 5) analytics with significant variations in methodological design and reporting quality. W&W showed consistent cost effectiveness (n = 7) and cost saving (n = 12) compared with surgery from third-party payer and patient perspectives. Critical parameters identified by uncertainty analysis were rates of local and distant recurrence in W&W, salvage surgery, perioperative mortality and utilities assigned to W&W and surgery. CONCLUSION Despite heterogenous methodological design and reporting quality, W&W is likely to be cost effective and cost saving compared with standard care following cCR in LARC. Clinical Trials Registration PROSPERO CRD42024513874.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishraq Murshed
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Zachary Bunjo
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Warren Seow
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ishmam Murshed
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Sergei Bedrikovetski
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Michelle Thomas
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jin Y, Jiang J, Mao W, Bai M, Chen Q, Zhu J. Treatment strategies and molecular mechanism of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett 2024; 591:216858. [PMID: 38621460 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) remodels the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and modulates the immune response to indirectly destroy tumor cells, in addition to directly killing tumor cells. RT combined with immunotherapy may significantly enhance the efficacy of RT in colorectal cancer by modulating the microenvironment. However, the molecular mechanisms by which RT acts as an immunomodulator to modulate the immune microenvironment remain unclear. Further, the optimal modalities of RT combined with immunotherapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer, such as the time point of combining RT and immunization, the fractionation pattern and dosage of radiotherapy, and other methods to improve the efficacy, are also being explored parallelly. To address these aspects, in this review, we summarized the mechanisms by which RT modulates TIME and concluded the progress of RT combined with immunization in preclinical and clinical trials. Finally, we discussed heavy ion radiation therapy and the efficacy of prediction markers and other immune combination therapies. Overall, combining RT with immunotherapy to enhance antitumor effects will have a significant clinical implication and will help to facilitate individualized treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhao Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, China; Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China; Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences Hangzhou, 310000, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Jin Jiang
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, 31400, China
| | - Wei Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, China; Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences Hangzhou, 310000, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Minghua Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Qianping Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, China; Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences Hangzhou, 310000, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
| | - Ji Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310000, China; Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China; Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences Hangzhou, 310000, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tissera NS, Freile B, Waisberg F, Esteso F, Galli M, Loria FS, Luca R, Pedraza II, Enrico DH, Chacón C, Huertas E, Chacón MR, O’Connor JM. Short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer: real-world evidence in Argentina. Ecancermedicalscience 2023; 17:1555. [PMID: 37396101 PMCID: PMC10310334 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) of 25 Gy in five daily fractions is a recommended strategy in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), as well as in cases of metastatic disease for local control. There is scarce information regarding the use of SCRT for patients who have received nonoperative management. Objectives To describe the characteristics of patients who received treatment with SCRT for LARC and metastatic rectal cancer, toxicity, and the approach after radiation treatment. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent SCRT for rectal cancer at the Alexander Fleming Institute from March 2014 to June 2022. Results In total, 44 patients were treated with SCRT. The majority were male (29, 66%), with a median age of 59 years (interquartile range 46-73). Most patients had stage IV disease (26, 59.1%), followed by LARC (18, 40.9%). Most lesions were located in the middle rectum (30, 68%). The majority of LARC patients underwent SCRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy (ChT) (16/18, 89%), while most patients with metastatic disease underwent SCRT followed by consolidation ChT (14/26, 53.8%). A clinical complete response (cCR) was documented in 8/44, 18.2% of patients. Most patients with LARC and cCR were managed by a watch and wait approach (5/18, 27.7%). Local recurrence was observed in LARC cases (2/18, 11.1%). Patients who underwent SCRT following consolidation ChT were more likely to have adverse events (AEs) than those undergoing induction ChT following SCRT (11/30, 36.7% versus 3/12, 25%, p = 0.02). Conclusion In a subgroup of patients diagnosed with LARC and treated with SCRT followed by ChT, surgical treatment could be omitted after they achieved a cCR. Local recurrence was similar to that reported in a previous study. SCRT is a reasonable option for local disease control in stage IV disease, yielding low toxicity rates. Therefore, decisions must be made by a multidisciplinary team. Prospective studies are necessary to reach further conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia S Tissera
- Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Translational Research Group, Vall´d Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 08035 Barcelona, Spain
- https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3396-6878
| | - Berenice Freile
- Department of Oncology, Alexander Fleming Institute, CABA C1426, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3192-126X
| | - Federico Waisberg
- Department of Oncology, Alexander Fleming Institute, CABA C1426, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4435-5068
| | - Federico Esteso
- Department of Oncology, Alexander Fleming Institute, CABA C1426, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-9846
| | - Mariana Galli
- Department of Radiotherapy, Alexander Fleming Institute, CABA C1426, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0147-2192
| | - Fernando Sanchez Loria
- Department of Surgery, Alexander Fleming Institute, CABA C1426, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-0649
| | - Romina Luca
- Department of Oncology, Alexander Fleming Institute, CABA C1426, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-905X
| | - Ivana Inés Pedraza
- Department of Surgery, Alexander Fleming Institute, CABA C1426, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9679-8368
| | - Diego Hernán Enrico
- Department of Oncology, Alexander Fleming Institute, CABA C1426, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4121-6855
| | - Carolina Chacón
- Department of Radiotherapy, Alexander Fleming Institute, CABA C1426, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8556-6325
| | - Eduardo Huertas
- Department of Surgery, Alexander Fleming Institute, CABA C1426, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3473-0928
| | - Matías Rodrigo Chacón
- Department of Oncology, Alexander Fleming Institute, CABA C1426, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6872-4185
| | - Juan Manuel O’Connor
- Department of Oncology, Alexander Fleming Institute, CABA C1426, Argentina
- https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6975-5466
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nonoperative Management Following Complete Response in Rectal Cancer After Short-course Radiation Therapy and Consolidation Chemotherapy: Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life Measures. Am J Clin Oncol 2022; 45:298-305. [PMID: 35700084 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of his study was to report on a cohort of patients managed with nonoperative management (NOM) with a watch-and-wait strategy after achieving complete response (CR) to sequential short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) and consolidation chemotherapy. METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients treated SCRT and chemotherapy who achieved a CR and were managed with NOM. Bowel function was assessed with European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer 29, and the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) questionnaires. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), freedom from local failure (FFLF), freedom from distant metastasis, and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Twenty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Seven (26.9%) patients developed local failure at a median of 6.8 months following CR, of which 5 were successfully salvaged. Median FFLF was not reached, with 6-month, 1-, and 2-year FFLF rates of 100.0%, 82.3%, and 71.3%. Median OS was not reached, with 6-month, 1-, and 2-year OS rates of 100%. Median DFS was not reached, with 6-month, 1-, and 2-year DFS rates of 100%, 95.0%, and 89.4%. Questionnaire response rate was 83.3%. Median LARS score was 27. Major, minor, and no LARS occurred in 3 (20%), 6 (40%), and 6 (40%) patients, respectively. There were no differences in questionnaire scores between patients who had the majority of their anal sphincter complex irradiated and those who did not. CONCLUSION NOM with a watch-and-wait strategy is safe and feasible in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieve CR after sequential SCRT and chemotherapy, with evidence for good anorectal function.
Collapse
|