1
|
Petrosian D, Fadul CE, Reilley M, Dillon P. Oesophageal adenocarcinoma presenting with synchronous brain metastases. BMJ Case Rep 2025; 18:e263641. [PMID: 39890418 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2024-263641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2025] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are rare and poorly understood complications of oesophageal carcinoma. This report describes a case of brain metastasis as the initial presentation of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The rarity and the lack of prospective clinical trials of brain metastasis in oesophageal cancer result in the absence of treatment guidelines. Common treatments for brain metastases, regardless of tumour of origin, are applicable to oesophageal brain metastases and include surgical resection, whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy/immunotherapy and/or symptomatic control with steroids and anticonvulsants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek Petrosian
- Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Camilo E Fadul
- Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Patrick Dillon
- Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yousef M, Hurd MW, Yousef A, Ludmir EB, Pillai AB, Peterson J, Koay EJ, Albarouki S, Tzeng CW, Snyder R, Katz MHG, Wang H, Overman MJ, Maitra A, Pant S, Smaglo BG, Wolff RA, Yao J, Shen JP, Zhao D. Clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with brain metastasis secondary to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncologist 2025; 30:oyae182. [PMID: 39014543 PMCID: PMC11783327 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is poor. Secondary brain metastasis (Br-M) occurs in less than 1% of patients. Clinical characteristics and molecular alterations have not been characterized in this rare patients' subset. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Foundry software platform was used to retrospectively query electronic health records for patients with Br-M secondary to PDAC from 2005 to 2023; clinical, molecular, and overall survival (OS) data were analyzed. RESULTS Br-M was diagnosed in 44 patients with PDAC. Median follow-up was 78 months; median OS from initial PDAC diagnosis was 47 months. Median duration from PDAC diagnosis to Br-M detection was 24 months; median OS from Br-M diagnosis was 3 months. At Br-M diagnosis, 82% (n = 36) of patients had elevated CA19-9. Lung was the most common preexisting metastatic location (71%) with Br-M, followed by liver (66%). Br-M were most frequently observed in the frontal lobe (34%, n = 15), cerebellar region (23%, n = 10), and leptomeninges (18%, n = 8). KRAS mutations were detected in 94.1% (n = 16) of patients who had molecular data available (n = 17) with KRASG12V being the most frequent subtype 47% (n = 8); KRASG12D in 29% (n = 5); KRASG12R in 18% (n = 3). Patients who underwent Br-M surgical resection (n = 5) had median OS of 8.6 months, while median OS following stereotactic radiosurgery only (n = 11) or whole-brain radiation only (n = 20) was 3.3 and 2.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Br-M is a late PDAC complication, resulting in an extremely poor prognosis especially in leptomeningeal disease. KRAS was mutated in 94.1% of the patients and the KRASG12V subtype was prevalent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Yousef
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mark W Hurd
- Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Abdelrahman Yousef
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ashwathy B Pillai
- Department of Hospital Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jennifer Peterson
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sali Albarouki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ching-Wei Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Rebecca Snyder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Huamin Wang
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Michael J Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Brandon G Smaglo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - James Yao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - John P Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Dan Zhao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Randrian V, Portales F, Bouché O, Thezenas S, Chibaudel B, Mabro M, Terrebonne E, Garnier-Tixidre C, Louvet C, André T, Aparicio T, Dubreuil O, Bouché G, Ychou M, Tougeron D. The METACER national cohort study of brain metastases in gastrointestinal cancers prospectively establishes prognostic factors. J Neurooncol 2025:10.1007/s11060-024-04905-x. [PMID: 39747714 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04905-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Availability data are scarce and primarily retrospective in patients with brain metastasis (BM) from gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. The objective of this cohort was to determine prognostic factors for survival outcomes in patients with BM from GI cancers. METHODS METACER is a national multicentric prospective cohort study which included patients with BM diagnosis during a histologically proven digestive cancer follow-up between 2010 and 2014. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were Progression-Free survival (PFS), prognostic factors, and BM-free survival as time from disease diagnosis to BM diagnosis. RESULTS METACER included 130 patients, with colorectal cancer (CRC) (N = 105) and eso-gastric (N = 25) cancer (EGC). The median OS was 6.6 months: 7.1 months (95%CI: 4.7-9.7) in CRC patients and 5.2 months, (95%CI: 1.9-7.6) in EG patients (p = 0.827). In multivariate analysis, cerebral BM location (versus cerebellar), BM surgery, performance status (0-1 versus 2), and a unique BM were significantly associated with prolonged OS. BM-free survival were 30.8 months (95%CI:25.2-36.9) in CRC patients and 7.8 months (95%CI:3.8-13.6) in EGC patients (p < 0.001). In synchronous metastatic disease, BM-free survival were 18.6 months (95%CI:13.1-25.2) in CRC patients and 3.7 months (95%CI:0.03-7.8) in EGC patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION BM in GI cancers are of poor prognosis. BM surgery should be considered in case of unique brain lesion. In metastatic settings, EGC patients have shorter BM-free survival than CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violaine Randrian
- Department of Hepatology and Gastro-enterology, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
- PRODICET, UR24144, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
| | - Fabienne Portales
- Department of Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, Reims, France
| | - Simon Thezenas
- Department of Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Benoist Chibaudel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Franco-Britannique - Fondation Cognacq-Jay, Cancérologie Paris Ouest, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - May Mabro
- Department of Oncology, Foch Hospital, GERCOR, Suresnes, France
| | - Eric Terrebonne
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Haut Lévèque, CIC 1401, Pessac, France
| | | | - Christophe Louvet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Thierry André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sorbonne University, Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Department of Gastroenterology, APHP, Saint Louis Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, FFCD, France
| | - Olivier Dubreuil
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - Gregoire Bouché
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut du Cancer Godinot, Reims, France
| | - Marc Ychou
- Department of Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - David Tougeron
- Department of Hepatology and Gastro-enterology, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
- PRODICET, UR24144, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Touponse GC, Li G, Tai JW, Rodrigues AJ, Granucci M, Burnside G, Bhambhvani HP, Han SS, Ji HP, Hayden Gephart M. Brain Metastases from Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Review from a Single Institution. World Neurosurg 2024; 193:964-974. [PMID: 39321918 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with brain metastases (BrMs) from esophageal cancer have poor prognosis, the incidence of which is expected to rise due to improved survival from the primary tumor and increased neuroimaging. We aimed to identify patient and esophageal cancer characteristics associated with longer survival in patients with BrMs and, secondly, to compare the prognosis of patients with HER2 overexpression. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with BrMs from esophageal cancer at a single institution from 2008-2021. We collected patient demographics, primary tumor and BrM characteristics, and treatment. Our primary outcome was median survival from the time of BrM. RESULTS The median age at primary diagnosis was 66.5 years and 86% were male. Of the 49 patients, 71% had adenocarcinoma, 20% squamous cell carcinoma and 8% other. In this group, 71% of patients presented with stage III or IV disease, including 16% with synchronous primary metastatis and BrM. The median time to BrM was 10.1 months (interquartile range 1.7-22.8) and the median survival from BrM was 8.4 months (95% CI 4.8-16.8 months). On multivariable analysis, treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.19; P = 0.04), surgical resection (HR 0.24; P = 0.03), and immunotherapy (HR 0.19; P = 0.04) were associated with increased survival while Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≤70 (HR = 13.2; P < 0.001) was associated with decreased survival. HER2 overexpression was found in 22% of patients, but we noted no survival difference (5.2 months HER2+ vs. 9.8 months HER2neg; P = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS The median survival from esophageal-to-brain metastasis was 8.4 months. Patients with a single lesion, KPS score >70, and treatment with surgical resection was correlated with improved survival. Further, HER2+ patients had distinct patient and BrM characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin C Touponse
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Guan Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jesse W Tai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adrian J Rodrigues
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Monica Granucci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Georgiana Burnside
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Hriday P Bhambhvani
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Summer S Han
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Hanlee P Ji
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Melanie Hayden Gephart
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bashti M, DeLong C, Gurses ME, Lu VM, Merenzon M, Morell A, Daggubati L, Komotar RJ, Shah AH, Ivan ME. Surgical Management of Brain Metastasis from Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Single-Center Experience. World Neurosurg 2024; 187:e568-e576. [PMID: 38704143 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases from esophageal cancer (BMEC) are rare and aggressive, with limited literature on optimal treatment modalities and a standard of care yet to be established. The objective of this study was to systematically review existing literature and perform a retrospective analysis of our institution's patients to evaluate the influence of different treatment modalities on patient outcomes. METHODS A systematic review of the literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and a retrospective review of our institutional experience with BMEC were both conducted. Data based on mean survival,histology, metastasis location, and treatment modality were abstracted. RESULTS A total of 48 studies representing 136 patients with BMEC were identified, in addition to the 11 patients treated at our institution. There were a total of 100 males (12 unreported), with a median age of 62.2 at diagnosis in our systematic review, along with 8 males with a median age of 62 in our institutional review. Collectively, survival rates observed based on histology were not similar (squamous cell carcinoma: 9.2 months, adenocarcinoma: 13.4 months), however, based on treatment modalities (surgery: 11.6 months, radiation: 10.4 months, chemotherapy: 12.3 months), and metastasis location (supratentorial: 10.5 months, infratentorial: 9.9 months), the survival times were comparable. CONCLUSIONS Our review suggests that causes of death were often independent of brain metastases highlighting the need for further studies on early detection and prevention of primary esophageal cancer, as well as improved treatment modalities for BMECs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malek Bashti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
| | - Chase DeLong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Muhammet Enes Gurses
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Victor M Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Martín Merenzon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alexis Morell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Lekhaj Daggubati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ricardo Jorge Komotar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA; Sylvester Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ashish H Shah
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA; Sylvester Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baccili Cury Megid T, Baskurt Z, Ma LX, Barron CC, Farooq A, Saltiel MP, Wang X, Bach Y, Ayoama H, Jang RW, Chen E, Veit-Haibach P, Wang B, Kalimuthu S, Cotton J, Wong R, Mesci A, Elimova E. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and brain metastases in gastroesophageal carcinoma: a real-world analysis of clinical and pathologic characteristics and outcomes. J Neurooncol 2024; 167:111-122. [PMID: 38372902 PMCID: PMC10978709 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04576-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastasis (BrM) and Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis (LMC) are uncommon complications in gastroesophageal carcinoma (GEC) patients. These patients have a poor prognosis and are challenging to treat. We described the clinicopathologic features and outcomes in the largest cohort of Central Nervous System (CNS) metastasis in GEC patients. METHODS single-center retrospective study of GEC treated from 2007 to 2021. Clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment modalities were reviewed. Survival was calculated from the date of CNS diagnosis until date of death/last follow-up using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used. RESULTS Of 3283 GEC patients, 100 (3.04%) were diagnosed with BrM and 20 with LMC (0.61%). Patients with known human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status (N = 48), 60% were HER2 positive (defined as IHC 3 + or IHC 2+/FISH+). Among LMC patients most were signet-ring subtype (85%), and only 15% (2/13) were HER2 positive. Median survival was 0.7; 3.8; and 7.7 months in BrM patients treated with best supportive care, radiation, and surgery, respectively (p < 0.001). In LMC, median survival was 0.7 month in patients who had best supportive care (7/19) and 2.8 months for those who had whole brain radiation therapy (p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis showed worse outcomes in ECOG ≥ 2 (p = 0.002), number of BrM ≥ 4 (p < 0.001) and number of metastatic sites (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION HER2 expression were enriched in patients with BrM, while it is uncommon in LMC. Patients treated with surgery followed by radiation had an improved OS in BrM and WBRT benefited patients with LMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zeynep Baskurt
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lucy X Ma
- Medical Oncology and Hematology at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Carly C Barron
- Medical Oncology and Hematology at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Abdul Farooq
- Medical Oncology and Hematology at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Xin Wang
- Medical Oncology and Hematology at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bach
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hiroko Ayoama
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Raymond W Jang
- Medical Oncology and Hematology at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric Chen
- Medical Oncology and Hematology at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick Veit-Haibach
- Toronto Joint Department Medical Imaging and University Health Network, Sinai Health System, University Medical Imaging Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ben Wang
- Department of Pathology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - James Cotton
- Department of Pathology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rebecca Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Aruz Mesci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Elena Elimova
- Medical Oncology and Hematology at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Murthy J, Moise J, Mi K, Aulakh S. Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Presenting as an Isolated Brain Lesion 6 Years After Treatment. ACG Case Rep J 2024; 11:e01263. [PMID: 38374924 PMCID: PMC10876248 DOI: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Intracranial metastasis is a rare sequela of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), typically presenting within the first 2 years after primary tumor detection. Our patient is a 72-year-old man diagnosed with an EAC in 2015 and presented with recurrence of a distant solitary brain lesion approximately 6 years after the initial diagnosis. Histological diagnosis was confirmed as EAC with all relevant indicators. In addition, we used genomic profiling to detect biomarkers that can be useful in the future for therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeevan Murthy
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV
| | - John Moise
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV
| | - Kaitlyn Mi
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
| | - Sonikpreet Aulakh
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, WV
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liang K, Feliciano JL, Marrone KA, Murray JC, Hann CL, Anagnostou V, Tackett SA, Shin EJ, Hales RK, Voong KR, Battafarano RJ, Yang SC, Broderick SR, Ha JS, Forde PM, Brahmer JR, Lam VK. Clinical features and outcomes of advanced HER2+ esophageal/GEJ cancer with brain metastasis. ESMO Open 2024; 9:102199. [PMID: 38071928 PMCID: PMC10837776 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastasis (BRM) is uncommon in gastroesophageal cancer. As such, clinicopathologic and molecular determinants of BRM and impact on clinical outcome remain incompletely understood. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathologic data from advanced esophageal/gastroesophageal junction (E/GEJ) patients at Johns Hopkins from 2003 to 2021. We investigated the association between several clinical and molecular features and the occurrence of BRM, with particular focus on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression. Survival outcomes and time to BRM onset were also evaluated. RESULTS We included 515 patients with advanced E/GEJ cancer. Tumors were 78.3% esophageal primary, 82.9% adenocarcinoma, 31.0% HER2 positive. Cumulative incidence of BRM in the overall cohort and within HER2+ subgroup was 13.8% and 24.3%, respectively. HER2 overexpression was associated with increased risk of BRM [odds ratio 2.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-5.46]. On initial presentation with BRM, 50.7% had a solitary brain lesion and 11.3% were asymptomatic. HER2+ status was associated with longer median time to onset of BRM (14.0 versus 6.3 months, P < 0.01), improved median progression free survival on first-line systemic therapy (hazard ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.80), and improved median overall survival (hazard ratio 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.54) in patients with BRM. CONCLUSION HER2 overexpression identifies a gastroesophageal cancer molecular subtype that is significantly associated with increased risk of BRM, though with later onset of BRM and improved survival likely reflecting the impact of central nervous system-penetrant HER2-directed therapy. The prevalence of asymptomatic and solitary brain lesions suggests that brain surveillance for HER2+ patients warrants prospective investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Liang
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - J L Feliciano
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - K A Marrone
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - J C Murray
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - C L Hann
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - V Anagnostou
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - S A Tackett
- Department of Medicine, Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Data Management (BEAD) Core, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - E J Shin
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - R K Hales
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - K R Voong
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - R J Battafarano
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - S C Yang
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - S R Broderick
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - J S Ha
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - P M Forde
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - J R Brahmer
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - V K Lam
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Taori S, Wei Z, Deng H, Hadjipanayis CG, Lunsford LD, Niranjan A. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases from gastroesophageal cancers. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:147-155. [PMID: 37470878 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04392-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of patients with brain metastases from gastroesophageal (GE) cancers remains unclear despite recent advances in systemic therapies. The authors present a large single-institution experience in the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS A retrospective review of 71 GE cancer patients (64 male, 90.14%) who underwent Gamma Knife SRS was conducted. Overall, 243 brain metastases were treated and the median number of metastases per patient was 2 (range:1-21). The median age at SRS was 66 years (range: 26-85) and the median treatment day KPS was 80 (range: 50-100). The median cumulative tumor volume was 6.7 cc (range: 0.27-104.76) and the median single-session margin dose was 18 Gy (range: 12-20). RESULTS The median overall survival after SRS was 7 months (range: 1-64). At last follow up, 54 (76.06%) patients were deceased, 8 of whom (14.81%) expired secondary to their intracranial metastases. Four patients (5.63%) experienced local tumor progression at a median time of 8 months (range: 2-13) after SRS. Ten patients (14%) experienced new remote tumor development at a median time of 4 months (range: 0-14) after SRS. Whole-brain radiation therapy (2 patients, 20%) and repeat SRS (8 patients, 80%) were used for newly developed tumors. The incidence of transient adverse radiation effects was 8.45%. CONCLUSIONS In this study, the 12-month local tumor control rate was 90%. Incidences of adverse radiation effect rates were rare. The median overall survival of 7 months indicates the poor prognosis of patients with brain spread of their GE cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suchet Taori
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Hansen Deng
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | | | - L Dade Lunsford
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Morshed RA, Nguyen MP, Cummins DD, Saggi S, Young JS, Haddad AF, Goldschmidt E, Chang EF, McDermott MW, Berger MS, Theodosopoulos PV, Hervey-Jumper SL, Daras M, Aghi MK. CDKN2A/B co-deletion is associated with increased risk of local and distant intracranial recurrence after surgical resection of brain metastases. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad007. [PMID: 36915611 PMCID: PMC10007908 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While genetic alterations in brain metastases (BMs) have been previously explored, there are limited data examining their association with recurrence after surgical resection. This study aimed to identify genetic alterations within BMs associated with CNS recurrence after surgery across multiple cancer types. Methods A retrospective, single-center study was conducted with patients who underwent resection of a BM with available clinical and gene sequencing data available. Local and remote CNS recurrence were the primary study outcomes. Next-generation sequencing of the coding regions in over 500 oncogenes was performed in brain metastasis specimens. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to identify clinical features and genomic alterations associated with CNS recurrence. Results A total of 90 patients undergoing resection of 91 BMs composed the cohort. Genes most frequently mutated in the cohort included TP53 (64%), CDKN2A (37%), TERT (29%), CDKN2B (23%), NF1 (14%), KRAS (14%), and PTEN (13%), all of which occurred across multiple cancer types. CDKN2A/B co-deletion was seen in 21 (23.1%) brain metastases across multiple cancer types. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses including patient, tumor, and treatment factors, CDKN2A/B co-deletion in the brain metastasis was associated with increased risk of local (HR 4.07, 95% CI 1.32-12.54, P = 0.014) and remote (HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.11-4.69, P = 0.025) CNS progression. Median survival and length of follow-up were not different based on CDKN2A/B mutation status. Conclusions CDKN2A/B co-deletion detected in BMs is associated with increased CNS recurrence after surgical resection. Additional work is needed to determine whether more aggressive treatment in patients with this mutation may improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramin A Morshed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Minh P Nguyen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel D Cummins
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Satvir Saggi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jacob S Young
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alexander F Haddad
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ezequiel Goldschmidt
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Mitchel S Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip V Theodosopoulos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Shawn L Hervey-Jumper
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mariza Daras
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Manish K Aghi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|