Trends and Characteristics of Potentially Preventable Emergency Department Visits Among Patients With Cancer in the US

Creating a Palliative Care Clinic for Patients with Cancer Pain and Substance Use Disorder

BACKGROUND

Opioids are a first-line treatment for severe cancer pain. However, clinicians may be reluctant to prescribe opioids for patients with concurrent substance use disorders (SUD) or clinical concerns about non-prescribed substance use.

MEASURES

Patient volume, 60-day retention rate, and use of sublingual buprenorphine to treat opioid use disorder.

INTERVENTION

We created the Palliative Harm Reduction and Resiliency Clinic, a palliative care clinic founded on harm reduction principles and including formal collaboration with addiction psychiatry.

OUTCOMES

During the first 18 months, patient volume increased steadily; 70% of patients had at least one subsequent visit within 60 days of the initial appointment; and buprenorphine was prescribed for 55% of patients with opioid use disorder.

CONCLUSIONS/LESSONS LEARNED

The formal collaboration with addiction psychiatry and the integration of harm reduction principles and practices into ambulatory palliative care improved our ability to provide treatment to a previously underserved patient population with high symptom burden.

Housing Status and Acute Care Use After Cancer Diagnosis

This cohort study examines housing status and acute care use after a cancer diagnosis among individuals treated at a public hospital in San Francisco, California.

Deconditioning in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Provide an overview of hospital-associated deconditioning in hospitalized patients with cancer, including risk factors and trajectory of deconditioning. Discuss interdisciplinary roles in preventing deconditioning, best practices, and oncology nursing implications.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed and on Google Scholar using search terms Hospital*, Mobility, Immobility, Deconditioning, Cancer, and Oncology. Peer-reviewed research studies, review articles, and websites of professional organizations were reviewed to provide an overview on mobility concerns in hospitalized patients with cancer.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight references were included in this overview of hospital-associated deconditioning (HAD) in patients with cancer. HAD is a widespread phenomenon with grave consequences. Patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable to HAD due to their cancer diagnosis and treatment effects. Physical activity in hospitalized patients is one of the most important practices to prevent HAD and is achieved through standardized mobility assessment and interdisciplinary collaboration.

CONCLUSIONS

Promoting mobility in hospitalized patients with cancer is essential to prevent the complications of HAD.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses are leaders of the interdisciplinary approach to enhance inpatient mobility. As they are most often at the bedside, nurses assess patients' level of mobility, recognize risk factors for HAD, and implement safe mobility interventions. Nurses experience barriers to promoting mobility including workforce shortages, high workloads, and competing priorities.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Emergency Department Utilization by Patients With Cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

Emergency department (ED)-based care is required for cirrhosis management, yet the burden of cirrhosis-related ED healthcare utilization is understudied. We aimed to describe ED utilization within a statewide health system and compare the outcomes of high ED use (HEDU) vs non-HEDU in individuals with cirrhosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of adults with cirrhosis who presented to any of 16 EDs within the Indiana University Health system in 2021. Patient characteristics, features of the initial ED visit, subsequent 90-day healthcare use, and 360-day outcomes were collected. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors HEDU status which was defined as ≥2 ED visits within 90 days after the index ED visit.

RESULTS

There were 2,124 eligible patients (mean age 61.3 years, 53% male, and 91% White). Major etiologies of cirrhosis were alcohol (38%), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (27%), and viral hepatitis (21%). Cirrhosis was newly diagnosed in the ED visit for 18.4%. Most common reasons for ED visits were abdominal pain (21%), shortness of breath (19%), and ascites/volume overload (16%). Of the initial ED visits, 20% (n = 424) were potentially avoidable. The overall 90-day mortality was 16%. Within 90 days, there were 366 HEDU (20%). Notable variables independently associated with HEDU were model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.044, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.005-1.085), prior ED encounter (aOR 1.520, 95% CI 1.136-2.034), and avoidable initial ED visit (aOR 1.938, 95% CI 1.014-3.703).

DISCUSSION

Abdominal pain, shortness of breath, and ascites/fluid overload are the common presenting reasons for ED visits for patients with cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis presenting to the ED experience a 90-day mortality rate of 16%, and among those who initially visited the ED, 20% were HEDU. We identified several variables independently associated with HEDU. Our observations pave the way for developing interventions to optimize the care of patients with cirrhosis presenting to the ED and to lower repeated ED visits.

Establishing Regionalized Acute Care Across a Health Care System to Decentralize Postoperative Care After Oncologic Surgery

PURPOSE

Patients undergoing oncologic surgery at major referral centers frequently experience postdischarge care fragmentation, which has been associated with poor outcomes. This report describes and evaluates the outcomes of an intervention at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) to decentralize postdischarge postoperative acute care within our health care system.

METHODS

In 2018, MSKCC completed the addition of six regional acute care clinics called symptom care clinics (SCCs) to existing regional outpatient clinics. Acute care was previously only available within our system at a single centralized urgent care center (UCC). All patients undergoing surgery in our system between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2021, were followed for 90 days. The exposure was the site of initial acute care presentation-UCC or SCC-and outcomes included utilization, access, financial toxicity, and mortality. Mortality was adjusted using hierarchical modeling at the level of the region.

RESULTS

A total of 6,992 postsurgical patients experienced 10,525 acute care visits in our system within 90 days of surgery. Twenty-nine percent of these patients presented to the SCC first. These patients were older but had fewer comorbidities and shorter index length of stay compared with UCC patients. Utilization of SCCs increased substantially while UCC utilization decreased during a period of stable case volume. SCCs were closer to patients' homes, and wait times were shorter. Rates of financial toxicity were similar between groups. Of this high-risk cohort accessing acute care postoperatively, 90-day mortality was similar for UCC and SCC patients (P = .731).

CONCLUSION

This model of decentralized acute care after oncologic surgery was increasingly used over time with comparable patient safety. Health systems should emphasize patient-centered care by supporting safe strategies for regionalized care even when treatments are delivered at centralized referral centers.

D-CRSE: Diminishing chemotherapy-related side effects through patient education, a mixed-methods pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Patient education materials regarding self-management of chemotherapy-related side effects are limited, which may result in patients using disreputable sources. We created a brochure that educates patients on common side effects, tools to address problems themselves, and guidance on when to contact their oncologist or seek emergency care. This mixed-methods study conducted at Penn State Cancer Institute evaluates the feasibility of using an educational brochure to improve patient outcomes through education.

METHODS

Chemotherapy naïve patients with breast or gastrointestinal (GI) cancer were enrolled in a single-arm clinical trial from December 2021 to 2022. Participants received the educational brochure and were asked to provide their initial impressions. They completed The Emotional Thermometer Scale (ETS) and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) to measure changes in patient symptoms and mental health throughout their chemotherapy course at 0, 6, and 12-week intervals. The drop-out rate was recorded as a measure of study feasibility.

RESULTS

The study participants were split between the following cancer types: 77.8% breast and 22.2% GI cancer. A significant decrease in overall mean ETS score was observed between baseline and week 6 (p = 0.001) and 12 (p = 0.0004), respectively. Moreover, the mean MSAS psychological symptoms decreased significantly at week 12 compared to baseline (p = 0.005), while no change was observed in physical symptoms (p = 0.101). Of the 40 participants who completed baseline surveys, 37 had at least one additional visit for a drop-out rate of 7.5%.

CONCLUSION

This mixed-methods pilot study was successful in demonstrating the feasibility of distributing a standardized educational brochure as an intervention for chemotherapy patients. While participants' emotional scores and psychological symptoms decreased over time, physical symptoms did not, which aligns with side effect progression from cumulative chemotherapy burden.

Emergency Department Use in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Early Survivors from 2006 to 2020

Purpose: Understanding emergency department (ED) use in adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors could identify gaps in AYA survivorship. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of 7925 AYA survivors (aged 15-39 years at diagnosis) who were 2-5 years from diagnosis in 2006-2020 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. We calculated ED utilization rates overall and by indication of the encounter (headache, cardiac issues, and suicide attempts). We estimated rate changes by survivorship year and patient factors associated with ED visit using a Poisson model. Results: Cohort was 65.4% women, 45.8% Hispanic, with mean age at diagnosis at 31.3 years. Overall, 38% of AYA survivors had ≥1 ED visit (95th percentile: 5 ED visits). Unadjusted ED rates declined from 374.2/1000 person-years (PY) in Y2 to 327.2 in Y5 (p change < 0.001). Unadjusted rates declined for headache, cardiac issues, and suicide attempts. Factors associated with increased ED use included: age 20-24 at diagnosis [relative risk (RR) = 1.30, 95% CI 1.09-1.56 vs. 35-39 years]; female (RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.47 vs. male); non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.38-1.95 vs. non-Hispanic white); comorbidity (RR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.16-1.55 for 1 and RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.40-2.30 for 2+ vs. none); and public insurance (RR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.70-2.32 vs. private). Compared with thyroid cancer, cancers associated with increased ED use were breast (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.24-1.70), cervical (RR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.76-2.71), colorectal (RR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.94-2.81), and sarcoma (RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.03-1.88). Conclusion: ED utilization declined as time from diagnosis elapsed, but higher utilization was associated with social determinants of health and cancer types.

Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position in emergency department utilization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Aim: Evaluate the association of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position (SEP) on emergency department (ED) visits for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which may reflect access to and quality of cancer care. Materials & methods: Patients with HCC identified from a commercial multi-payer claims database between 2015 and 2018 were matched to near-neighborhood social determinants of health (SDOH) and stratified by race/ethnicity and SEP (proxied by annual household income). Analyses evaluated the effect of race/ethnicity and SEP on ED utilization, adjusting for SDOH, demographic and clinical characteristics using multivariable regression methods. Results: A total of 22,247 patients were included. Black and Hispanic patients had 43 and 18% higher ED utilization than White patients at higher-income levels (p < 0.01); these differences were nonsignificant at lower-income. Regardless of income level, Asian patients had lower ED utilization. Conclusion: Further research on the intersectionality between race/ethnicity, SEP and other SDOH may guide structural-level interventions to address health inequities.

Perspectives of emergency department physicians and nurses on reasons for preventable emergency department visits by patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer frequently visit the emergency department (ED) for medical care, yet approximately half of ED visits for patients with cancer are thought to be preventable. Preventable ED visits are associated with increased healthcare costs and poor patient experiences and outcomes. The voices of ED providers who work with patients with cancer in their everyday practices have not been solicited as it pertains to preventable visits.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to describe the perspectives of ED physicians and nurses on reasons for preventable ED visits by patients with cancer.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive design guided the study. We conducted 23 semi-structured interviews with ED physicians and nurses to query them about their perspectives on the reasons for preventable ED visits by patients with cancer. Content analysis was conducted to list and describe the reasons they discussed.

RESULTS

Participants identified five "medical" and five "non-medical" causes of preventable ED visits. Medical reasons included uncontrolled cancer pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, anemia, fever, and on-going undiagnosed signs and symptoms. Non-medical reasons include patient hesitancy to contact primary care providers, lack of availability or responsiveness of primary providers, lack of access, lack of care coordination, and fears about diagnosis and treatment.

CONCLUSION

The voices of ED providers should be included in discussions about the problem of preventable ED visits by patients with cancer. The reasons supplied by the participants suggest that solutions to the problem will need to occur at the patient, provider, system, and societal levels.

Comparing the use of aggressive end-of life care among frail and non-frail patients with cancer using a claims-based frailty index

INTRODUCTION

Despite mounting consensus that end-of-life (EOL) care for patients with cancer should focus on improving quality of life, many patients continue to receive aggressive, disease-oriented treatment until death. Within this group, patients with increased frailty may be at higher risk of adverse treatment-related outcomes. We therefore examined the relationship between degree of frailty and receipt of aggressive EOL care among Medicare-insured patients with cancer in Ohio.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS) linked with Medicare claims, we identified patients diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer who died between 2012 and 2016. Frailty was operationalized using a validated claims-based frailty index. Six quality indicators reflecting receipt of aggressive EOL care were identified from claims: (1) any cancer-directed treatment, (2) >1 emergency department (ED) visit, (3) >1 hospital admission, (4) any intensive care unit (ICU) admission in the last 30 days of life, (5) entry to hospice in the last three days of life, and (6) in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to control for demographic factors, Medicare and Medicaid dual enrollment, and cancer type and stage in the relationship between frailty and aggressive EOL care.

RESULTS

Overall, 31,465 patients met selection criteria. Patients with moderate/severe frailty were less likely than non-/pre-frail patients to receive any aggressive EOL care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.86-0.99]). This group was also less likely to undergo cancer-directed treatment in their last 30 days or to enter hospice in their last three days. Increasing frailty was associated with lower odds of admission to the ICU in the last 30 days of life (mild frailty: aOR 0.88 [0.83-0.94]; moderate/severe frailty: aOR 0.85 [0.78-0.92]) or of dying in-hospital (mild frailty: 0.85 [0.79-0.91]; moderate/severe frailty: aOR 0.74 [0.67-0.82]), but higher odds of having >1 ED visit in the last 30 days of life (mild frailty: aOR 1.43 [1.32-1.53]; moderate/severe frailty: aOR 1.61 [1.47-1.77]).

DISCUSSION

These findings suggest the need for more explicit discussion of emergency care seeking for patients with cancer at the end of life.

Avoidable emergency department visits among palliative care cancer patients: novel insights from Saudi Arabia and the Middle East

BACKGROUND

Several studies emerging from developed countries have highlighted a significant number of potentially avoidable emergency department (ED) visits by cancer patients during the end-of-life period. However, there is a paucity of information from developing nations regarding palliative care practices and the utilization of the ED by palliative care patients. Herein, we aim to characterize ED admissions among patients receiving palliative care at our tertiary center in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study evaluating ED visits amongst adult patients with advanced cancer who were receiving treatment under the palliative care department. This study took place over a period of 12 months from July 2021 through to July 2022. Three palliative care specialist physicians independently and blindly reviewed each patient's ED visits and determined whether the visit was avoidable or unavoidable.

RESULTS

A total of 243 patients were included in the final analysis, of which 189 (78.1%) patients had unavoidable visits and 53 (21.9%) patient visits were classified as avoidable. A significantly higher proportion of breast cancer patients presented with unavoidable admissions (14.3% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.037) compared to other cancer types. The incidence of dyspnea (23.8% vs. 5.7%, P < 0.001) and fevers/chills (23.3% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.005) was significantly higher in patients with unavoidable visits. Patients with avoidable visits had a significantly greater proportion of visits for dehydration (13.2% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.002). Notably, although hospital stay was significantly longer in the unavoidable group (P = 0.045), mortality for palliative care patients-regardless of whether their ED visit was avoidable or unavoidable-was not statistically different (P=-0.069).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest and most comprehensive study from Saudi Arabia and the Middle East providing insights into the utilization of palliative care services in the region and the propensity of advanced cancer patients towards visiting the ED. Future studies ought to explore interventions to reduce the frequency of avoidable ED visits.

Patient symptoms, self-management, and unscheduled healthcare use during the first 6 months of targeted oral anticancer agent therapy: protocol for a mixed-methods US study

INTRODUCTION

Targeted oral anticancer agents (OAAs) are increasingly used to treat cancer, including haematological malignancies and ovarian cancer, but they can cause serious symptomatic side effects such as arrhythmias, hypertension, and hyperglycaemia. Unaddressed OAA symptoms or inadequately managed symptoms may also lead to unnecessary and unscheduled healthcare use that decreases patient quality of life and financially burdens both patients and the healthcare system. Limited information is available about patient symptoms, self-management behaviours, and use of healthcare services over time while taking targeted OAAs, but is needed to ensure successful OAA therapy. The primary objective is to understand patient experiences and behaviours on initiating targeted OAA, and elicit cancer care clinicians' (ie, physicians, advanced practice practitioners, nurses, and pharmacists) perspectives on supporting patients during therapy. Study results will inform comprehensive and realistic interventions that minimise disruptions to therapy while maximising quality of life.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a remote single-arm, convergent-parallel mixed-methods cohort study within a large academic medical centre. A minimum of 60 patients will be enrolled. Patients will complete several validated patient-reported outcome measures at six timepoints over 6 months. Mixed-effects logistic regression will be used to predict the primary binary outcome of unscheduled healthcare use by patient self-efficacy for symptom self-management. Semistructured interviews will be conducted with patients and clinicians and thematically analysed. Triangulated quantitative and qualitative results will be reported using cross-case comparison joint display.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study protocol is approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Michigan Medical School (IRBMED). Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences, and disseminated to study participants.

Emergency Palliative Care: Patient With Cancer Diagnosis and Escalating Symptom Burden

In this segment of the emergency department (ED) palliative care (PC) case series, we present a patient with advanced cancer not yet followed by PC or on hospice, who presents to the ED overnight with worsening nausea, vomiting, and acute on chronic abdominal pain. The ED team works to stabilize and treat the patient, reaches out to his oncologist, and seeks remote support and guidance from the on-call PC clinician. After a rapid "just-in-time" training, the ED clinician is able to have a focused goals-of-care conversation with the patient and his family and make person-centered recommendations. The patient is briefly admitted to the intensive care unit for ongoing medical optimization and symptom management, and then subsequently discharged home on hospice in alignment with his elucidated goals.

Validating the Emergency Department Avoidability Classification (EDAC): A cluster randomized single-blinded agreement study

INTRODUCTION

The Emergency Department Avoidability Classification (EDAC) retrospectively classifies emergency department (ED) visits that could have been safely managed in subacute primary care settings, but has not been validated against a criterion standard. A validated EDAC could enable accurate and reliable quantification of avoidable ED visits. We compared agreement between the EDAC and ED physician judgements to specify avoidable ED visits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a cluster randomized, single-blinded agreement study in an academic hospital in Hamilton, Canada. ED visits between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019 were clustered based on EDAC classes and randomly sampled evenly. A total of 160 ED visit charts were randomly assigned to ten participating ED physicians at the academic hospital for evaluation. Physicians judged if the ED visit could have been managed appropriately in subacute primary care (an avoidable visit); each ED visit was evaluated by two physicians independently. We measured interrater agreement between physicians with a Cohen's kappa and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We evaluated the correlation between the EDAC and physician judgements using a Spearman rank correlation and ordinal logistic regression with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. We examined the EDAC's precision to identify avoidable ED visits using accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

ED physicians agreed on 139 visits (86.9%) with a kappa of 0.69 (95% CI 0.59-0.79), indicating substantial agreement. Physicians judged 96.2% of ED visits classified as avoidable by the EDAC as suitable for management in subacute primary care. We found a high correlation between the EDAC and physician judgements (0.64), as well as a very strong association to classify avoidable ED visits (OR 80.0, 95% CI 17.1-374.9). The EDACs avoidable and potentially avoidable classes demonstrated strong accuracy to identify ED visits suitable for management in subacute care (82.8%, 95% CI 78.2-86.8).

DISCUSSION

The EDAC demonstrated strong evidence of criterion validity to classify avoidable ED visits. This classification has important potential for accurately monitoring trends in avoidable ED utilization, measuring proportions of ED volume attributed to avoidable visits and informing interventions intended at reducing ED use by patients who do not require emergency or life-saving healthcare.

The efficacy and safety of ketamine for depression in patients with cancer: A systematic review

Background

Management of depression in the oncology population includes supportive psychotherapeutic interventions with or without psychotropic medication, which take time to demonstrate effectiveness. Fast-acting interventions, like ketamine, can provide a rapid antidepressant effect; however, there has been limited research on effects of ketamine among cancer patients. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of research on the efficacy and safety of ketamine on depression in patients with cancer.

Methods

We reviewed the published literature in MEDLINE® (via PubMed®), EMBASE, and Scopus from 1 January 1982 to 20 October 2022. We screened the retrieved abstracts against inclusion criteria and conducted a full-text review of eligible studies. Following extraction of data from included studies, we used a framework analysis approach to summarize the evidence on using ketamine in patients with cancer.

Results

All 5 included studies were randomized clinical trials conducted in inpatient settings in China. In all included studies ketamine was administered intravenously. Three studies used only racemic ketamine, and two studies used both S-ketamine and racemic ketamine. All included studies reported ketamine a tolerable and effective drug to control depression symptoms.

Conclusion

Included studies showed administration of sub-anesthesia ketamine significantly improves postoperative depression among patients with cancer.

Pediatric cancer patient emergency department visits and disposition by sociodemographic and economic characteristics

BACKGROUND

Limited research has been conducted on cancer-related emergency department (ED) patterns among pediatric cancer patients, including whether there are differences in the characteristics of individuals who seek ED care for cancer complications. The objectives of this study were to determine whether rates and disposition of cancer-related ED visits and hospital admissions in childhood cancer patients differ by sociodemographic factors.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of ED encounters with a cancer diagnosis code among patients aged 0-19 years from the 2019 National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) was conducted. Weighted logistic regression models were utilized to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for a primary cancer-related encounter, and hospital admission overall and by subgroup characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the unweighted 6,801,711 ED encounters in children aged 0-19 years, 10,793 were classified as visits by cancer patients. ED encounters of Hispanic versus non-Hispanic White pediatric cancer patients had higher odds of having a cancer-related primary diagnosis (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04-1.27). ED encounters of non-Hispanic Black pediatric patients and those in the lowest zip code income quartile had higher odds of hospital admission (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.08-1.53; OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.15-1.46), while rurality was associated with lower odds of hospital admission (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57-0.83).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that pediatric cancer patients from certain under-resourced communities are more likely to use the ED for cancer treatment complications, and their encounters are more likely to result in admission to the hospital.

Association Between Concurrent Use of Benzodiazepines and Opioids and Health Care Utilization Among Patients With Cancer in Puerto Rico

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines (BZDs) and emergency room (ER) visits and hospital admissions in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry-Health Insurance Linkage. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and incidence rate ratio (IRR) were estimated using logistic and negative binomial regression analyses to assess the association between concurrent use of opioids and BZDs (overlap of at least 7 days) and ER visits and hospital admissions.

RESULTS

A total of 9,259 patients were included in the main analysis. The logistic regression results showed a significant association between concurrent use of opioids and BZDs and at least one ER visit (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.54]) or hospital admission (OR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.18 to 1.71]) compared with individuals with BZDs alone, after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity index, cancer stage, health insurance, and health region. Compared with individuals with opioid use alone, the association did not reach significance. In the negative binomial regression, a significant association was observed for ER visits (IRR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.31 to 1.76]) and hospitalizations (IRR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.20 to 1.50]) when compared with individuals with BZDs alone. Compared with individuals with opioids alone, it only reached significance for ER visits (IRR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.20 to 1.61]).

CONCLUSION

Careful evaluation must be done before prescribing concurrent opioids and BZDs in patients with cancer, as the results suggest that coprescribing may increase the odds of ER visits and hospitalizations.

Financial toxicity in cancer patients and subsequent risk of repeat acute care utilization

Background

Acute care (AC) visits by cancer patients are costly sources of healthcare resources and can exert a financial burden of oncology care both for individuals with cancer and healthcare systems. We sought to identify whether cancer patients who reported more severe initial financial toxicity (FT) burdens shouldered excess risks for acute care utilization.

Methods

In 225 adult patients who participated in the Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) survey study of individuals receiving ambulatory cancer care between March and September 2019, we measured the baseline FT (a multidimensional score of 0-10 indicating the least to most severe global, material, and coping FT burdens). All AC visits, including emergency department (ED) and unplanned hospital admissions, within 1-year follow-up were identified. The association between the severity of FT and the total number of AC visits was tested using Poisson regression models.

Results

A total of 18.6% (n = 42) of patients had any AC visit, comprising 64.3% hospital admissions and 35.7% ED visits. Global FT burden was associated with the risk of repeat AC visits within 1-year follow-up (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.29, P < 0.001 for every unit increase), even after adjusting for sociodemographic and disease covariates. When examining subdimensions of FT, the burden of depleted FT coping resources (coping FT) was strongly associated with the risk of repeat AC visits (RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.15-1.40, P < 0.001) while material FT burden showed a trend toward association (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.99-1.15, P = 0.07).

Conclusion

In this prospective study of acute oncology care utilization outcomes among adult cancer patients, FT was a predictor of a higher burden of acute care visits. Patients with severely depleted material and also practical and social coping resources were at particular risk for repeated visits. Future studies are needed to identify whether early FT screening and intervention efforts may help to mitigate urgent acute care utilization burdens.

Emergency Department Visits among Cancer Patients during SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a global impact. Patients with cancer, their caregivers, and physicians need to balance the challenges associated with COVID-19 while ensuring cancer care. Nevertheless, emotional distress and hospital departmental reorganization could have led to a decrease in ED admissions even among oncological patients. Methods: We compared the 72 days of the pandemic in 2020 with the same calendar days in 2019 and 2021, defining a 20% decrease in ED visits as clinically significant. We studied the cause for visit, its severity, outcome (admission vs. discharge vs. death vs. hospice/palliative care), the tumor site, and method of arrival to the ED for the 3 time periods. Results: A significant decrease in ED oncological visits was found in 2020 compared to 2019, before returning to similar numbers in 2021. Fear, anxiety, and worry, in addition to hospital departmental reorganization, surely had an important role in the delay of ED visits, which resulted in irreparable consequences.