1
|
Paquet SP, Pronovost E, Simonyan D, Caouette G, Matte-Gagné C, Olivier F, Bartholomew J, Morin A, Mohamed I, Marc I, Guillot M. Maternal high-dose docosahexaenoic acid supplementation and neurodevelopment at 5 Years of preterm children. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2024; 64:253-262. [PMID: 39396702 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 08/31/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is the most abundant omega-3 fatty acid in the brain and is accumulated by the fetal brain during the last trimester of pregnancy. Our objective was to determine whether high-dose DHA supplementation during the neonatal period, vs. placebo, improves behavioral functioning at 5 years in children born very preterm. METHODS This is a follow-up at 5 years corrected age of a subset of children who participated in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The participants received a high-dose DHA supplementation, or a placebo, through maternal breastmilk until 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. Primary outcome was child behavioral functioning, assessed by the Total Difficulties Score from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Secondary outcomes included behavioral scores from the SDQ, executive functions assessment and global developmental performance. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed through interviews with parents. Mean differences between DHA and placebo groups were estimated using mixed linear models. Subgroup analyses were conducted for sex and gestational age (GA) at birth. RESULTS Among 177 eligible children, 132 (74.6 %) completed neurodevelopmental assessment at 5 years (DHA, N = 64, placebo, N = 68). Total Difficulties Score did not differ between the DHA and placebo groups (mean differences, -0.9 [95 % confidence interval, -2.7 to 0.8], P = 0.30), nor any of the secondary outcomes. There was no significant interaction between treatment groups and sex, nor GA, for the primary outcome. However, significant interactions between treatment groups and sex or GA were found for some secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In very preterm infants, high-dose DHA supplementation did not improve behavioral functioning at 5 years. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02371460, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02371460.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara-Pier Paquet
- Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, 2705 Boulevard Laurier, G1V 4G2, Québec, Canada.
| | - Etienne Pronovost
- Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, 2705 Boulevard Laurier, G1V 4G2, Québec, Canada.
| | - David Simonyan
- Clinical and Evaluative Research Platform, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 2705 Boulevard Laurier, G1V 4G2, Québec, Canada.
| | - Georges Caouette
- Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, 2705 Boulevard Laurier, G1V 4G2, Québec, Canada.
| | - Célia Matte-Gagné
- School of Psychology, Université Laval, 2325 Rue des Bibliothèques, G1V 0A6, Québec, Canada.
| | - François Olivier
- Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, H4A 3J1, Montréal, Canada.
| | - Julie Bartholomew
- Department of Neonatology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, H3T 1E2, Montréal, Canada.
| | - Alyssa Morin
- Department of Pediatrics, Hôpital Fleurimont, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 12e Avenue Nord, J1H 5H3, Sherbrooke, Canada.
| | - Ibrahim Mohamed
- Departments of Pediatrics and Nutrition, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, H3T 1C5, Montréal, Canada.
| | - Isabelle Marc
- Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, 2705 Boulevard Laurier, G1V 4G2, Québec, Canada.
| | - Mireille Guillot
- Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, 2705 Boulevard Laurier, G1V 4G2, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lapillonne A, Lembo C, Moltu SJ. Evidence on docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid supplementation for preterm infants. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2024; 27:283-289. [PMID: 38547330 DOI: 10.1097/mco.0000000000001035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW For many decades, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation was tested in premature infants to achieve an intake equivalent to the average level in breast milk, but this approach has led to conflicting results in terms of development and health outcomes. Higher doses of DHA closer to fetal accumulation may be needed. RECENT FINDINGS The efficacy of DHA supplementation for preterm infants at a dose equivalent to the estimated fetal accumulation rate is still under investigation, but this may be a promising approach, especially in conjunction with arachidonic acid supplementation. Current data suggest benefit for some outcomes, such as brain maturation, long-term cognitive function, and the prevention of retinopathy of prematurity. The possibility that supplementation with highly unsaturated oils increases the risk of neonatal morbidities should not be ruled out, but current meta-analyzes do not support a significant risk. SUMMARY The published literature supports a DHA intake in preterm infants that is closer to the fetal accumulation rate than the average breast milk content. Supplementation with DHA at this level in combination with arachidonic acid is currently being investigated and appears promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Lapillonne
- Department of Neonatology, APHP, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital
- EHU 7328 PACT, Paris Cite University, Paris, France
- CNRC Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chiara Lembo
- Department of Neonatology, APHP, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital
| | - Sissel J Moltu
- Department of Neonatal Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gould JF, Roberts RM, Anderson PJ, Makrides M, Sullivan TR, Gibson RA, McPhee AJ, Doyle LW, Bednarz JM, Best KP, Opie G, Travadi J, Cheong JLY, Davis PG, Sharp M, Simmer K, Tan K, Morris S, Lui K, Bolisetty S, Liley H, Stack J, Collins CT. High-Dose Docosahexaenoic Acid in Newborns Born at Less Than 29 Weeks' Gestation and Behavior at Age 5 Years: Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr 2024; 178:45-54. [PMID: 37983037 PMCID: PMC10660239 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.4924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
Importance Children born at less than 29 weeks' gestation are at risk of behavioral difficulties. This may be due in part to the lack of transplacental supply of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), a key fatty acid with structural and functional roles in the brain. Objective To determine whether meeting the neonatal DHA requirement through supplementation is associated with improved behavioral functioning of children born at less than 29 weeks' gestation. Design, Setting and Participants This was a follow-up of children from 10 Australian participating centers in a multi-center, blinded, parallel group randomized clinical trial of infants born at less than 29 weeks' gestation conducted from June 2012 and September 2015, excluding those with additional fatty acid supplementation or major congenital or chromosomal abnormalities. Follow-up took place from August 2018 to May 2021. Parents of surviving children who had not withdrawn from the original trial were invited to complete questionnaires when the child turned 5 years' corrected age. Interventions Infants were randomized to receive daily enteral emulsions providing 60 mg/kg/d of DHA or a soy-oil emulsion (with no DHA) from within the first 3 days of enteral feeding until 36 weeks' postmenstrual age or discharge home, whichever occurred first. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome of this follow-up was parent-rated behavior and emotional functioning as indicated by the Total Difficulties score of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Parents also completed questionnaires about their child's behavioral manifestations of executive functioning, as well as a range of health outcomes to assess potential longer-term side effects of DHA intervention. Results Primary outcome data were available for 731 children (76% of 958 surviving eligible children; 361 in the intervention group and 370 in the control group). Of these 731, 452 (47%) were female, and the mean (SD) corrected age at follow-up was 5.4 (0.5) years. Following imputation for missing data, the mean Total Difficulties score was the same in both groups (intervention group, n = 465; mean [SD], 11.8 [6.3]; control group, n = 493; mean [SD], 11.8 [6.0]; mean difference adjusted for sex, gestational age stratum, and hospital, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.87 to 0.89; P = .98). There was no evidence for differences between the groups in any secondary outcomes of behavior, executive functioning, or health. Conclusions and Relevance In this follow-up of a randomized clinical trial, enteral DHA supplementation at the equivalent of the estimated in utero dose for infants born at less than 29 weeks' gestation did not improve behavioral functioning at age 5 years. There were no indications of adverse effects with DHA supplementation. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12612000503820.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline F. Gould
- SAHMRI Women and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rachel M. Roberts
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Peter J. Anderson
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria Makrides
- SAHMRI Women and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Thomas R. Sullivan
- SAHMRI Women and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Robert A. Gibson
- SAHMRI Women and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond, South Australia, Australia
| | - Andrew J. McPhee
- Neonatal Medicine, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lex W. Doyle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jana M. Bednarz
- SAHMRI Women and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Karen P. Best
- SAHMRI Women and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gillian Opie
- Neonatal Services, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Javeed Travadi
- Newborn Services, John Hunter Children’s Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Te Whatu Ora Waikato, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Jeanie L. Y. Cheong
- Neonatal Medicine, The Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter G. Davis
- Neonatal Medicine, The Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary Sharp
- King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Karen Simmer
- The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kenneth Tan
- Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Monash Children’s Hospital, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Scott Morris
- Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kei Lui
- School of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Helen Liley
- Mater Research – The Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Stack
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carmel T. Collins
- SAHMRI Women and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|