The COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Inequities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment and Outcomes

Hospital COVID-19 Burden and Adverse Event Rates

Importance

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced stresses on hospitals due to the surge in demand for care and to staffing shortages. The implications of these stresses for patient safety are not well understood.

Objective

To assess whether hospital COVID-19 burden was associated with the rate of in-hospital adverse effects (AEs).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Quality and Safety Review System, a surveillance system that tracks the frequency of AEs among selected hospital admissions across the US. The study sample included randomly selected Medicare patient admissions to acute care hospitals in the US between September 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was the association between frequency of AEs and hospital-specific weekly COVID-19 burden. Observed and risk-adjusted rates of AEs per 1000 admissions were stratified by the weekly hospital-specific COVID-19 burden (daily mean number of COVID-19 inpatients per 100 hospital beds each week), presented as less than the 25th percentile (lowest burden), 25th to 75th percentile (intermediate burden), and greater than the 75th percentile (highest burden). Risk adjustment variables included patient and hospital characteristics.

Results

The study included 40 737 Medicare hospital admissions (4114 patients [10.1%] with COVID-19 and 36 623 [89.9%] without); mean (SD) patient age was 73.8 (12.1) years, 53.8% were female, and the median number of Elixhauser comorbidities was 4 (IQR, 2-5). There were 59.1 (95% CI, 54.5-64.0) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the lowest, 77.0 (95% CI, 73.3-80.9) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with intermediate, and 97.4 (95% CI, 91.6-103.7) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the highest COVID-19 burden. Among patients without COVID-19, there were 55.7 (95% CI, 51.1-60.8) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the lowest, 74.0 (95% CI, 70.2-78.1) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with intermediate, and 79.3 (95% CI, 73.7-85.3) AEs per 1000 admissions during weeks with the highest COVID-19 burden. A similar pattern was seen among patients with COVID-19. After risk adjustment, the relative risk (RR) for AEs among patients admitted during weeks with high compared with low COVID-19 burden for all patients was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.09-1.39; P < .001), with similar results seen in the cohorts with (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.71; P = .03) and without (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; P = .002) COVID-19 individually.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of hospital admissions among Medicare patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, greater hospital COVID-19 burden was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital AEs among both patients with and without COVID-19. These results illustrate the need for greater hospital resilience and surge capacity to prevent declines in patient safety during surges in demand.

An immunology model for accelerated coronary atherosclerosis and unexplained sudden death in the COVID-19 era

The immunological basis for cardiac deaths remote from potential triggering viral infection, including SARS-CoV-2 infection, remains enigmatic. Cardiac surface inflammation, including the pericardium, epicardium and superficial myocardium with associated coronary artery vasculitis in infant Kawasaki Disease (KD) and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is well recognised. In this perspective, we review the evidence pointing towards prominent post-viral infection related epicardial inflammation in older subjects, resulting in atherosclerotic plaque destabilisation with seemingly unrelated myocardial infarction that may be temporally distant from the actual infectious triggers. Cardiac surface inflammation in the relatively immune cell rich tissues in the territory though where the coronary arteries traverse is common in the adult post-COVD pneumonic phase and is also well described after vaccination including pre-COVID era vaccinations. Immunologically, the pericardium/epicardium tissue was known to be critical for coronary artery territory atherosclerotic disease prior to the COVID-19 era and may be linked to the involvement of the coronary artery vasa vasorum that physiologically oxygenates the coronary artery walls. We highlight how viral infection or vaccination-associated diffuse epicardial tissue inflammation adjacent to the coronary artery vasa vasorum territory represents a critical unifying concept for seemingly unrelated fatal coronary artery atherosclerotic disease, that could occur soon after or remote from infection or vaccination in adults. Mechanistically, such epicardial inflammation impacting coronary artery vasa vasorum immunity acts as gateways towards the slow destabilisation of pre-existing atherosclerotic plaques, with resultant myocardial infarction and other cardiac pathology. This model offers immunologists and academic cardiologists an immunopathological roadmap between innocuous viral infections or vaccinations and seemingly temporally remote "unrelated" atherosclerotic disease with excess cardiac deaths.

Hospital Strain During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Outcomes in Older Racial and Ethnic Minority Adults

Importance

Marginalized populations have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Critically ill patients belonging to racial and ethnic minority populations treated in hospitals operating under crisis or near-crisis conditions may have experienced worse outcomes than White individuals.

Objective

To examine whether hospital strain was associated with worse outcomes for older patients hospitalized with sepsis and whether these increases in poor outcomes were greater for members of racial and ethnic minority groups compared with White individuals.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cross-sectional study, multivariable regression analysis was conducted to assess differential changes in all-cause 30-day mortality and major morbidity among older racial and ethnic minoritized individuals hospitalized with sepsis compared with White individuals and changes in hospital strain using Medicare claims data. Data were obtained on patients hospitalized between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, and analyzed between December 16, 2023, and July 11, 2024.

Exposure

Time-varying weekly hospital percentage of inpatients with COVID-19.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Composite of all-cause 30-day mortality and major morbidity.

Results

Among the 5 899 869 hospitalizations for sepsis (51.5% women; mean [SD] age, 78.2 [8.8] years), there were 177 864 (3.0%) Asian, 664 648 (11.3%) Black, 522 964 (8.9%) Hispanic, and 4 534 393 (76.9%) White individuals. During weeks when the hospital COVID-19 burden was greater than 40%, the risk of death or major morbidity increased nearly 2-fold (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.90; 95% CI, 1.80-2.00; P < .001) for White individuals compared with before the pandemic. Asian, Black, and Hispanic individuals experienced 44% (AOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.28-1.61; P < .001), 21% (AOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.33; P < .001), and 45% (AOR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.32-1.59; P < .001) higher risk of death or morbidity, respectively, compared with White individuals when the hospital weekly COVID-19 burden was greater than 40%.

Conclusion and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study, older adults hospitalized with sepsis were more likely to die or experience major morbidity as the hospital COVID-19 burden increased. These increases in adverse outcomes were greater in magnitude among members of minority populations than for White individuals.

Characteristics and Rates of Preterm Births During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany

Importance

Population-based analyses provided divergent data on the changes in preterm birth rates during the COVID-19 pandemic, and there is a gap of knowledge on the variations in birth characteristics.

Objective

To study changes in perinatal care, causes of preterm delivery, and very preterm (VPT; defined as <32 weeks' gestation) birth rates before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-level cohort study used data from the quality assurance registry, which covers all births in Hesse, Germany. Deliveries during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) were compared with the corresponding grouped prepandemic time intervals (2017 to 2019). Analyses were executed between August 2023 and July 2024.

Exposures

Analyses were directed to study differences in preterm births before and during 3 pandemic phases: first (March 14 to May 15, 2020) and second (October 19 to December 31, 2020) lockdowns and a period of less-vigorous restrictions between them (May 16 to October 18, 2020).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes of interest were variations in preterm birth rates in the context of baseline characteristics and causes of preterm births during vs before the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

From the total cohort of 184 827 births from 2017 to 2020, 719 stillbirths occurred and 184 108 infants were liveborn. Compared with the prepandemic period, medical care characteristics did not differ during the COVID-19 period. The odds of VPT births were lower during the pandemic period (odds ratio [OR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95) compared with the prepandemic period, with the greatest reduction observed during the second lockdown period (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.84). Reduction in VPT births was attributed to fewer births in pregnancies among individuals with a history of serious disease (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.83), pathologic cardiotocography (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.82), and intrauterine infection (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92) while incidences of history of preterm birth, multiple pregnancies, serious or severe psychological distress, and preeclampsia, eclampsia, or hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome as cause for preterm delivery remained unchanged.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this population-based cohort study on the COVID-19 pandemic and preterm birth rates, the duration of exposure to mitigation measures during pregnancy was associated with accelerated reductions in preterm births. The findings of lower rates of baseline risks and causes of preterm deliveries support efforts to intensify health care prevention programs during pregnancy to reduce the preterm birth burden. These findings of this study put particular focus on hygiene measures to reduce the rate of deliveries for intrauterine infection and highlight the potential of expanding strategies to the different risks and causes of preterm delivery.

Insurance-based Disparities in Outcomes and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Utilization for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to examine insurance-based disparities in mortality, nonhome discharges, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilization in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

METHODS

Using a national database of U.S. academic medical centers and their affiliated hospitals, the risk-adjusted association between mortality, nonhome discharge, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilization and (1) the type of insurance coverage (private insurance, Medicare, dual enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid, and no insurance) and (2) the weekly hospital COVID-19 burden (0 to 5.0%; 5.1 to 10%, 10.1 to 20%, 20.1 to 30%, and 30.1% and greater) was evaluated. Modeling was expanded to include an interaction between payer status and the weekly hospital COVID-19 burden to examine whether the lack of private insurance was associated with increases in disparities as the COVID-19 burden increased.

RESULTS

Among 760,846 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 214,992 had private insurance, 318,624 had Medicare, 96,192 were dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, 107,548 had Medicaid, and 23,560 had no insurance. Overall, 76,250 died, 211,702 had nonhome discharges, 75,703 were mechanically ventilated, and 2,642 underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The adjusted odds of death were higher in patients with Medicare (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.21 to 1.35]; P < 0.0005), dually enrolled (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.30 to 1.50]; P < 0.0005), Medicaid (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.20 to 1.36]; P < 0.0005), and no insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.26 to 1.62]; P < 0.0005) compared to patients with private insurance. Patients with Medicare (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47; [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.58]; P < 0.0005), dually enrolled (adjusted odds ratio, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.43]; P < 0.0005), Medicaid (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.79]; P < 0.0005), and no insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.56]; P < 0.001) were less likely to be placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation than patients with private insurance. Mortality, nonhome discharges, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilization did not change significantly more in patients with private insurance compared to patients without private insurance as the COVID-19 burden increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with COVID-19, insurance-based disparities in mortality, nonhome discharges, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilization were substantial, but these disparities did not increase as the hospital COVID-19 burden increased.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Mortality for Time-Sensitive Conditions at Urban vs Rural Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Importance

COVID-19 pandemic-related disruptions to the health care system may have resulted in increased mortality for patients with time-sensitive conditions.

Objective

To examine whether in-hospital mortality in hospitalizations not related to COVID-19 (non-COVID-19 stays) for time-sensitive conditions changed during the pandemic and how it varied by hospital urban vs rural location.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study was an interrupted time-series analysis to assess in-hospital mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 8, 2020, to December 31, 2021) compared with the prepandemic period (January 1, 2017, to March 7, 2020) overall, by month, and by community COVID-19 transmission level for adult discharges from 3813 US hospitals in the State Inpatient Databases for the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.

Exposure

The COVID-19 pandemic.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality among non-COVID-19 stays for 6 time-sensitive medical conditions: acute myocardial infarction, hip fracture, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, pneumonia, sepsis, and stroke. Entropy weights were used to align patient characteristics in the 2 time periods by age, sex, and comorbidities.

Results

There were 18 601 925 hospitalizations; 50.3% of patients were male, 38.5% were aged 18 to 64 years, 45.0% were aged 65 to 84 years, and 16.4% were 85 years or older for the selected time-sensitive medical conditions from 2017 through 2021. The odds of in-hospital mortality for sepsis increased 27% from the prepandemic to the pandemic periods at urban hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.25-1.29) and 35% at rural hospitals (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.30-1.40). In-hospital mortality for pneumonia had similar increases at urban (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.42-1.54) and rural (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.36-1.57) hospitals. Increases in mortality for these 2 conditions showed a dose-response association with the community COVID-19 level (low vs high COVID-19 burden) for both rural (sepsis: 22% vs 54%; pneumonia: 30% vs 66%) and urban (sepsis: 16% vs 28%; pneumonia: 34% vs 61%) hospitals. The odds of mortality for acute myocardial infarction increased 9% (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.06-1.12) at urban hospitals and was responsive to the community COVID-19 level. There were significant increases in mortality for hip fracture at rural hospitals (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.53) and for gastrointestinal hemorrhage at urban hospitals (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.09-1.21). No significant change was found in mortality for stroke overall.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, in-hospital mortality for time-sensitive conditions increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mobilizing strategies tailored to the different needs of urban and rural hospitals may help reduce the likelihood of excess deaths during future public health crises.