Severity and Etiology of Incident Stroke in Patients Screened for Atrial Fibrillation vs Usual Care and the Impact of Prior Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the LOOP Randomized Clinical Trial

Electrocardiogram prediction of atrial fibrillation risk after stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common clinical arrhythmias. This study aims to predict the risk of post-stroke AF through electrocardiographic changes in sinus rhythm.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE databases to identify relevant research articles published until August 2023. Prioritized items from systematic reviews and meta-analyses were screened, and data related to AF detection rate were extracted. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted for data synthesis and analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies involving electrocardiograms (ECG) were included, with a total analysis population of 330,284 individuals. Among them, 16,662 individuals (ECG abnormal group) developed AF, while 313,622 individuals (ECG normal group) did not. ECG patterns included terminal P-wave terminal force V1, interatrial block (IAB), advanced interatrial block, abnormal P-wave axis, pulse rate prolongation, and atrial premature complexes. Overall, 15,762 patients experienced AF during the study period (4.77%). In the ECG abnormal group, the proportion was 14.21% (2367/16,662), while in the control group (ECG normal group), the proportion was 4.27% (13,395/313,622). The pooled risk ratio for developing AF was 2.45 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.02-2.98, P < .001), with heterogeneity (I2) of 95%. The risk ratio values of alAB, P-wave terminal force V1, interatrial block, abnormal P-wave axis, pulse rate prolongation and atrial premature complexes were 4.12 (95% CI, 2.99-5.66), 1.47 (95% CI, 1.19-1.82), 2.54 (95% CI, 1.83-3.52), 1.70 (95% CI, 0.98-2.97), 2.65 (95% CI, 1.88-3.72), 3.79 (95% CI, 2.12-6.76), respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant correlation between ECG patterns and the occurrence of AF. The alAB exhibited the highest level of predictability for the occurrence of AF. These indicators support their use as screening tools to identify high-risk individuals who may benefit from further examinations or empirical anticoagulation therapy following stroke.

The ABC-Stroke Risk Score and Effects of Atrial Fibrillation Screening on Stroke Prevention: Results From the Randomized LOOP Study

BACKGROUND

The ABC-stroke score is a risk scheme for prediction of stroke or systemic embolism (SE) in atrial fibrillation (AF). This study sought to examine whether the score could be useful in predicting stroke in AF-naïve individuals and risk stratifying for AF screening.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The LOOP (Atrial Fibrillation Detected by Continuous ECG Monitoring Using Implantable Loop Recorder to Prevent Stroke in High-Risk Individuals) study randomized 6004 AF-naïve individuals aged 70 to 90 years with stroke risk factors to either screening with an implantable loop recorder and anticoagulation upon detection of new-onset AF episodes ≥6 minutes, or usual care. A total of 5781 participants had available ABC-stroke score at baseline and were included in this secondary analysis: 4170 (72.1%) with an estimated stroke/SE risk ≤1%/year versus 1611 (27.9%) with an estimated stroke/SE risk >1%/year. Having an annual ABC-stroke risk >1% was associated with stroke/SE, stroke/SE/cardiovascular death, and all-cause death (hazard ratio, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.44-2.21], 2.17 [95% CI, 1.80-2.62], and 2.19 [95% CI, 1.87-2.56], respectively). For screening with implantable loop recorder versus usual care, no significant reduction in these study outcomes was obtained in any ABC-stroke risk groups (P>0.0500 for all), with no signal toward interaction (Pinteraction>0.2500 for all). Similar findings were yielded when assessing the ABC-stroke score as a continuous variable.

CONCLUSIONS

In an elderly, AF-naïve population with additional stroke risk factors, a higher ABC-stroke score could identify individuals with increased stroke risk. However, this risk score may not be useful in pinpointing those more likely to benefit from AF screening and subsequent preventive treatment. These findings should be considered as hypothesis generating and warrant further study.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifier: NCT02036450.

Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Setting of Reperfusion Therapy: Insights and Strategies for Optimized Care

Reperfusion therapy in the form of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has revolutionised the field of stroke medicine. Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients constitute a major portion of the overall stroke population; however, the prevalence of AF amongst acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients receiving reperfusion therapy remains unclear. Limitations in our understanding of prevalence in this group of patients are exacerbated by difficulties in appropriately diagnosing AF. Additionally, the benefits of reperfusion therapy are not consistent across all subgroups of AIS patients. More specifically, AIS patients with AF often tend to have poor prognoses despite treatment relative to those without AF. This article aims to present an overview of the diagnostic and therapeutic management of AF and how it mediates outcomes following stroke, most specifically in AIS patients treated with reperfusion therapy. We provide unique insights into AF prevalence and outcomes that could allow healthcare professionals to optimise the treatment and prognosis for AIS patients with AF. Specific indications on acute neurovascular management and secondary stroke prevention in AIS patients with AF are also discussed.

The gray areas of oral anticoagulation for prevention of thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation patients

Thromboembolic events (TEE) associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) are highly recurrent and usually severe, causing permanent disability or, even, death. Previous data consistently showed significantly lower TEE in anticoagulated patients. While warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is still used worldwide, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown noninferiority to warfarin in the prevention of TEE, and represent, to date, the preferred treatment. DOACs present favorable pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy profiles, especially among vulnerable patients including the elderly, those with renal dysfunction or previous TEE. Yet, regarding specific settings of AF patients it is unclear whether oral anticoagulation therapy is beneficial, or otherwise it is the maintenance of sinus rhythm, mostly achieved through a catheter ablation-based rhythm control strategy, that prevents the causal complications linked to AF. While it is known that low-risk patients [CHA2DS2-VASc 0 (males), or score of 1 (females)] present low ischemic stroke or mortality rates (<1%/year), it remains unclear whether they need any prophylaxis. Furthermore, the appropriate anticoagulation regimen for those individuals requiring cardioversion, either pharmacologic or electric, as well as peri-procedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing trans-catheter ablation that nowadays encompasses different energies, are still a matter of debate. In addition, AF concomitant with other clinical conditions is discussed and, lastly, the choice of prescribing anticoagulation to asymptomatic patients diagnosed with subclinical AF at either wearable or implanted devices. The aim of this review will be to provide an update on current strategies in the above-mentioned settings, and to suggest possible therapeutic options, finally focusing on AF-related cognitive decline.

Implantable loop recorder detection for atrial fibrillation to prevent stroke in high-risk patients

ABSTRACT

Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are cardiac-monitoring devices that detect dangerous dysrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation (AF). This article discusses whether ILRs can prevent strokes in high-risk patients by detecting AF.

Determining the etiology of cerebral stroke: from the most prevalent to rare causes

Cerebral stroke remains the leading cause of death and disability worldwide as well as in Ukraine. After a cerebral stroke, there is an increased risk of a new cerebral stroke (9‒15 % within 1 year), and about a quarter of all cerebral stroke are recurrent. Up to 80 % of recurrent cerebral stroke can be avoided through lifestyle modifications (healthy diet, sufficient amount of physical activity, normalization of body weight, cessation of smoking and alcohol abuse) and control of chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and atrial fibrillation. The key to effective secondary prevention is determining the etiology of cerebral stroke, which requires a primary examination in all cases and a number of additional tests as needed. The most common causes of ischemic cerebral stroke are cardiogenic embolism, atherosclerosis of the large cerebral arteries (macroangiopathy), and brain small vessels disease (microangiopathy), but approximately 1/3 of cerebral stroke have other, rear, determined cause or the cause remains unknown despite the appropriate workup (cryptogenic cerebral stroke). In the review, we discuss modern approaches to ischemic cerebral stroke classification and determination of their etiology, from the most prevalent to the rarest causes. A careful search for the cause of cerebral stroke is particularly important in young patients (aged 18 to 50 years) with a high life expectancy. We have reviewed in detail the possibilities of screening for subclinical atrial fibrillation by long-term cardiac monitoring with implantable devices and the diagnosis of monogenetic causes of cerebral stroke, with a particular focus on Fabry disease, for which there is an effective treatment.