Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Stroke Attributed to Large- or Small-Vessel Disease: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the STROKE AF Randomized Clinical Trial

NET burden in left atrial blood is associated with biomarkers of thrombosis and cardiac injury in patients with enlarged left atria

BACKGROUND

Emerging data suggest an association between left atrial (LA) enlargement, thrombus formation, and ischemic stroke. However, it is unknown what may mediate such clot formation in LA dysfunction. Neutrophils promote large vessel occlusion and microthrombosis via neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) release, thus lying at the interface of inflammation, thrombosis, and fibrosis.

APPROACH

We conducted a prospective all-comers cohort study in patients undergoing catheterization procedures with atrial transseptal access (MitraClip, MC; left atrial appendage closure, LAAC; pulmonary vein ablation, PVA; patent foramen ovale closure, PFO). We measured NETs, cytokines, thrombotic factors, and cardiac injury markers in paired blood samples collected from peripheral blood and within the left atrium. We correlated these biomarkers with echocardiographic measures of LA structure and function (including left atrial volume index, LAVI). Data were analyzed by procedure type, and stratified by LAVI or atrial fibrillation (AF) status.

RESULTS

We enrolled 70 patients (mean age 64 years, 53% women). NETs, but not other markers, were elevated in LA compared to peripheral blood samples. Most thrombotic, inflammatory, and cardiac damage markers were elevated in LAs from MC or LAAC compared to PFO patients. Overall, NET biomarkers positively correlated with VWF, LAVI, and markers of cardiac injury and negatively with ADAMTS13 activity. LA enlargement and the presence of AF similarly stratified patients based on thromboinflammation measurements, but this was not limited to AF at the time of sample collection.

CONCLUSION

Elevated NETs and VWF in patients with enlarged LA or AF suggest enhanced thromboinflammation within the LA.

Thin aortic arch plaque is associated with the development of atrial fibrillation for embolic stroke of undetermined source in patients with an insertable cardiac monitor

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This study's objective is to investigate whether mild aortic arch plaque is associated with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) in stroke patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) during the first year following the implantation of an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM).

METHODS

The participants in this cross-sectional observational study were consecutive patients with ESUS, even after transesophageal echocardiography. We assessed the relationship between the thickness of the participants' aortic arch plaque and AF detected after ICM implantation.

RESULTS

Of the 50 consecutive patients with ESUS enrolled in this study, 12 (24%) developed AF. We observed that thicker aortic arch plaque was associated with undetected AF (2.3 mm vs. 1.2 mm, p < 0.001). Aortic arch plaque thickness was independent associated with undetected AF (OR 54.00, 95% CI 2.706-1077.544, p = 0.009). When the cut-off value for aortic arch plaque thickness was 1.8 mm, the sensitivity and specificity were 71.1% and 91.7%, respectively (95% CI = 0.75-0.98, p < 0.001). Also, patients having both aortic arch plaque with a thickness < 1.8 mm and a CHADS2 score ≥ 4 were more likely to have detectable AF than no AF (88% vs. 12%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A thinner aortic arch plaque was associated with the development of AF. Patients with mild aortic plaques below 4 mm but ≥1.8 mm in thickness and without other high-risk features are less likely to have paroxysmal AF on ICM, and these plaques may be a possible source of embolism for their strokes.

Atrial Fibrillation In Patients With Stroke Attributed to Large- or Small-Vessel Disease: 3-Year Results From the STROKE AF Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The STROKE AF study found that in patients with prior ischemic stroke attributed to large-artery atherosclerotic disease (LAD) or small-vessel occlusive disease (SVD), 12% developed AF over 1 year when monitored with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM). The occurrence over subsequent years is unknown.

Objectives

To compare the rates of AF detection through 3 years of follow-up between an ICM vs site-specific usual care in patients with prior ischemic stroke attributed to LAD or SVD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, randomized (1:1) clinical trial took place at 33 sites in the US with enrollment between April 2016 and July 2019 and 3-year follow-up through July 2022. Eligible patients were aged 60 years or older, or aged 50 to 59 years with at least 1 additional stroke risk factor and had an index ischemic stroke attributed to LAD or SVD within 10 days prior to ICM insertion. Of the 496 patients enrolled, 492 were randomized and 4 were excluded.

Interventions

ICM monitoring vs site-specific usual care.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The prespecified long-term outcome of the trial was AF detection through study follow-up (up to 3 years). AF was defined as an episode lasting more than 30 seconds, adjudicated by an expert committee.

Results

In total, 492 patients were randomized and included in the analyses (median [IQR] age, 66 [60-74] years; 307 men [62.4%] and 185 women [37.6%]), of whom 314 completed 3-year follow-up (63.8%). The incidence rate of AF at 3 years was 21.7% (46 patients) in the ICM group vs 2.4% (5 patients) in the control group (hazard ratio, 10.0; 95% CI, 4.0-25.2; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Patients with ischemic stroke attributed to LAD or SVD face an increasing risk of AF over time and most of the AF occurrences are not reliably detected by standard medical monitoring methods. One year of negative monitoring should not reassure clinicians that patients who have experienced stroke will not develop AF over the next 2 years.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02700945.

Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Setting of Reperfusion Therapy: Insights and Strategies for Optimized Care

Reperfusion therapy in the form of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has revolutionised the field of stroke medicine. Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients constitute a major portion of the overall stroke population; however, the prevalence of AF amongst acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients receiving reperfusion therapy remains unclear. Limitations in our understanding of prevalence in this group of patients are exacerbated by difficulties in appropriately diagnosing AF. Additionally, the benefits of reperfusion therapy are not consistent across all subgroups of AIS patients. More specifically, AIS patients with AF often tend to have poor prognoses despite treatment relative to those without AF. This article aims to present an overview of the diagnostic and therapeutic management of AF and how it mediates outcomes following stroke, most specifically in AIS patients treated with reperfusion therapy. We provide unique insights into AF prevalence and outcomes that could allow healthcare professionals to optimise the treatment and prognosis for AIS patients with AF. Specific indications on acute neurovascular management and secondary stroke prevention in AIS patients with AF are also discussed.

Low Utility of Short-Term Rhythm Assessment Before Long-Term Rhythm Monitoring in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke

Implantable cardiac monitors are routinely placed for long-term monitoring (LTM) after a period of negative short-term monitoring (STM) to increase atrial fibrillation (AF) detection after a cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Optimizing AF monitoring after a cryptogenic stroke is critical to improve outcomes and reduce costs. We sought to compare the diagnostic yield of STM versus LTM, assess the impact of routine STM on hospitalization length of stay, and perform a financial analysis comparing the current model to a theoretical model wherein patients can proceed directly to LTM. Our retrospective observational cohort study analyzed patients admitted to Montefiore Medical Center between May 2017 and June 2022 with a primary diagnosis of cryptogenic stroke or TIA who underwent Holter device monitoring. Of 396 subjects, STM detected AF in 10 (2.5%) compared with a diagnostic yield of 14.6% for LTM (median time to diagnosis of 76 days). Of the 386 patients with negative STM, 130 (33.7%) received an implantable cardiac monitor while an inpatient, and 256 (66.3%) did not. We calculated a point estimate of 1.67 days delay of discharge attributable to the requirement for STM to precede LTM. Our model showed that the expected cost per patient in the STM-first paradigm is $28,615.33 versus $27,111.24 in the LTM-or-STM paradigm. Considering the relatively lower diagnostic yield of STM and its association with a longer length of stay and higher costs, it may be reasonable to proceed directly to LTM to optimize AF detection after a cryptogenic stroke or TIA.