1
|
Escande A, Leblanc J, Hannoun-Levi JM, Renard S, Ducassou A, Hennequin C, Chargari C. Place of radiotherapy for treatment of metastatic cervical, vaginal and endometrial uterine cancer. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:15-21. [PMID: 37507287 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Beyond classical palliative-intent irradiation schemes, there are increasing data suggesting a benefit for intensive locoregional treatments in metastatic gynecological cancers. Such approach aims at avoiding local symptoms related to tumor progression, but may also improve survival outcome by shrinking tumor burden to a microscopic state. This strategy is rarely considered upfront (in highly selected patients with very limited oligometastatic disease), but rather after systemic treatment. In case of tumor response (especially if complete response) of the metastatic sites, pelvic±para-aortic radiotherapy can be considered in combination with a brachytherapy boost to obtain long-term local control, in particular in cervical or vaginal cancer patients. Such approach seems particularly relevant when there is isolated persistence or progression of macroscopic disease within the pelvis. In parallel, there is also an increasing place for radiotherapy of oligo-metastatic sites. We review the literature on the place of radiotherapy in the management of cancers of the cervix and metastatic endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Escande
- Radiotherapy department, Centre Léonard de Vinci, Dechy, France, CRIStAL lab, UMR9189, University of Lille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France, H.Warembourg, School of medicine, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - J Leblanc
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie-Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - J-M Hannoun-Levi
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université de Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - S Renard
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - A Ducassou
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - C Hennequin
- Service de cancérologie-radiothérapie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75475 Paris, France
| | - C Chargari
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie-centre hospitalier universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière-Assistance publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris 75013, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chargari C, Peignaux K, Escande A, Renard S, Lafond C, Petit A, Lam Cham Kee D, Durdux C, Haie-Méder C. Radiotherapy of cervical cancer. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:298-308. [PMID: 34955418 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
External beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy are major treatments in the management of cervical cancer. For early-stage tumours with local risk factors, brachytherapy is a preoperative option. Postoperative radiotherapy is indicated according to histopathological criteria. For advanced local tumours, chemoradiation is the standard treatment, followed by brachytherapy boost, which is not optional. We present the update of the recommendations of the French Society of Oncological Radiotherapy on the indications and techniques for external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Chargari
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France.
| | - K Peignaux
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, avenue Professeur-Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - A Escande
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, avenue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| | - S Renard
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - C Lafond
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Eugène-Marquis, avenue de la Bataille-Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - A Petit
- Département de radiothérapie, centre régional de lutte contre le cancer institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - D Lam Cham Kee
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Alexandre-Lacassagne, avenue de Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - C Durdux
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - C Haie-Méder
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre de cancérologie, Charlebourg la Défense, 65, avenue Foch, 92250 La Garenne-Colombes, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mignot F, Gouy S, Schernberg A, Bockel S, Espenel S, Maulard A, Leary A, Genestie C, Annede P, Kissel M, Fumagalli I, Pautier P, Deutsch E, Haie-Meder C, Morice P, Chargari C. Comprehensive analysis of patient outcome after local recurrence of locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiation and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:644-648. [PMID: 32173045 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since dose escalation allowed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), local relapses have become a rare event. Only scarce data are available on the outcome of patients experiencing a local relapse after IGABT. METHODS Between 2004 and 2016, all consecutive patients treated at Gustave Roussy Institute for LACC and receiving concomitant chemoradiation and IGABT were analysed. Clinical and treatment-related prognostic factors for survival after local relapse were searched, in order to potentially identify patients requiring salvage treatment. RESULTS Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were treated during this period. With a median follow-up of 4.1 years, 10.8% (n = 28) had a local relapse. Among these patients, 53.6% had synchronous lymph nodes or distant metastatic relapse and only 13 patients (5% of all patients) had isolated local relapse. After local relapse, median survival was 47 months and three patients were alive at last follow-up. Only three patients with local relapse could receive salvage surgery (10.7%). Metastases occurrence and pelvic wall involvement were the main contraindications (67.9%) for salvage surgery. Among the three patients treated with surgery, two are still alive at last follow-up without significant complication. Improved survival was observed among the two patients who could have surgery (p = .02). Local progression led to serious symptoms in 75% of patients. Only the time interval between brachytherapy and relapse (<1 year) was prognostic for 2-year overall survival (p = .005). CONCLUSION Salvage surgery is feasible in a very low number of highly selected patients with local relapse following IGABT. Local failure is a major cause of severe local symptoms, confirming that every effort should be done to achieve long-term local control through dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Mignot
- Brachytherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| | - S Gouy
- Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - A Schernberg
- Brachytherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - S Bockel
- Brachytherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - S Espenel
- Brachytherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - A Maulard
- Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - A Leary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - C Genestie
- Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - P Annede
- Brachytherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - M Kissel
- Brachytherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - I Fumagalli
- Brachytherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - P Pautier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - E Deutsch
- Brachytherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - C Haie-Meder
- Brachytherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - P Morice
- Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - C Chargari
- Brachytherapy Unit, Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France; French Military Health Services Academy, Paris, France; Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Brétigny sur Orge, France
| |
Collapse
|