1
|
Wang S, Chen Z, Wang K, Li H, Qu H, Mou H, Lin N, Ye Z. Effect of radiotherapy on local control and overall survival in spinal metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer after surgery and systemic therapy. Bone Jt Open 2024; 5:350-360. [PMID: 38649150 PMCID: PMC11035006 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.54.bjo-2024-0037.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Aims Radiotherapy is a well-known local treatment for spinal metastases. However, in the presence of postoperative systemic therapy, the efficacy of radiotherapy on local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) in patients with spinal metastases remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of post-surgical radiotherapy for spinal metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and to identify factors correlated with LC and OS. Methods A retrospective, single-centre review was conducted of patients with spinal metastases from NSCLC who underwent surgery followed by systemic therapy at our institution from January 2018 to September 2022. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare the LC and OS between groups. Associated factors for LC and OS were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results Overall, 123 patients with 127 spinal metastases from NSCLC who underwent decompression surgery followed by postoperative systemic therapy were included. A total of 43 lesions were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after surgery and 84 lesions were not. Survival rate at one, two, and three years was 83.4%, 58.9%, and 48.2%, respectively, and LC rate was 87.8%, 78.8%, and 78.8%, respectively. Histological type was the only significant associated factor for both LC (p = 0.007) and OS (p < 0.001). Treatment with targeted therapy was significantly associated with longer survival (p = 0.039). The risk factors associated with worse survival were abnormal laboratory data (p = 0.021), lesions located in the thoracic spine (p = 0.047), and lumbar spine (p = 0.044). This study also revealed that postoperative radiotherapy had little effect in improving OS or LC. Conclusion Tumour histological type was significantly associated with the prognosis in spinal NSCLC metastasis patients. In the presence of post-surgical systemic therapy, radiotherapy appeared to be less effective in improving LC, OS, or quality of life in spinal NSCLC metastasis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengdong Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Orthopedic Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zehao Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Orthopedic Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Keyi Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Orthopedic Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hengyuan Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Orthopedic Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hao Qu
- Department of Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Orthopedic Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haochen Mou
- Department of Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Orthopedic Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Nong Lin
- Department of Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Orthopedic Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhaoming Ye
- Department of Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Orthopedic Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao Z, Zhang S, Xu L, Xu S, Zhang X, Liu T, Liu X, Yu S. Hidden blood loss and its influencing factors after cement augmentation for vertebral metastasis. Heliyon 2024; 10:e27742. [PMID: 38560262 PMCID: PMC10979198 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Few studies have focused on the risk factors for hidden blood loss (HBL) during cement augmentation surgery for pathologic vertebral compression fraction (PVCFs). Method From January 2014 to December 2020, the clinical data of 169 PVCF patients (283 levels) who underwent cement augmentation were retrospectively analysed. HBL was calculated according to the linear Gross formula using the patient's average Hct during the perioperative course and PBV. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the independent factors associated with HBL. Results The mean HBL was 448.2 ± 267.2 ml, corresponding to 10.8% ± 6.2% of the patient blood volume (PBV). There were significant differences between pre- and postoperative haematocrit (Hct) (P < 0.001) and Hb (P < 0.001), and 132 patients developed anaemia postoperatively, while 79 patients had anaemia preoperatively (P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression revealed that bone lesion quality (p = 0.028), number of PVCFs (p = 0.002), amount of bone cement (p = 0.027), bone cement leakage (p = 0.001), and percentage of vertebral height loss (VHL) (p = 0.011) were independent risk factors for HBL. Conclusion In conclusion, patients with lytic vertebral destruction, larger amounts of bone cement, greater amounts of bone cement leakage, more PVCF(s), and greater percentages of VHL may be more prone to HBL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenguo Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shuguang Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Libin Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Songfeng Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xinxin Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Ting Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xuan Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shengji Yu
- Department of Orthopedics, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiang J, Miao L, Zhang L, Shi Z, Zhang H, Wen X, Hu S, Xu L, Gong L, Li M. Assessing the Feasibility of Simplifying the Scanning Protocol for Spinal Metastases With Vertebral Compression Fractures Using Only the Dixon T2-Weighted Sequence. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2024:00004728-990000000-00307. [PMID: 38595136 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Conventional imaging protocols, including sagittal T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and water-only T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), are time consuming when screening for spinal metastases with vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). In this study, we aimed to assess the accuracy of using only the Dixon T2-weighted sequence in the diagnosis of spinal metastases with VCFs to determine its suitability as a simplified protocol for this task. METHODS This retrospective study included 27 patients diagnosed with spinal metastases and VCFs. Qualitative analysis was performed separately by two musculoskeletal radiologists, who independently performed diagnostic evaluations of each vertebra using both conventional and simplified protocols. McNemar's test was then used to compare the differences in diagnostic results, and Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to assess interobserver and interprotocol agreement. Diagnostic performance values for both protocols, including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve, were then determined based on the reference standard. Quantitative image analysis was performed randomly for 30 metastases on T1WI and fat-only T2WI to measure the signal intensity, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio. RESULTS The diagnosis of VCFs by both radiologists was in full agreement with the reference standard. The classification of spinal metastases and diagnostic performance values determined by both radiologists were not significantly different between the two protocols (all P > 0.05), and the consistency between observers and protocols was excellent (κ = 0.973-0.991). The contrast-to-noise ratio of fat-only T2WI was significantly higher than that of T1WI (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The Dixon T2-weighted sequence alone performed well in diagnosing spinal metastases with VCFs, performing no worse than the conventional protocol (T1WI and water-only T2WI). This suggests that the Dixon T2-weighted sequence alone can serve as a simplified protocol for the diagnosis of spinal metastases with VCFs, thereby avoiding the need for more intricate scanning procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lei Miao
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology
| | - Li Zhang
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology
| | - Zhuo Shi
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology
| | | | - Xin Wen
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology
| | - Sijie Hu
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology
| | | | - Lihua Gong
- Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Meng Li
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grosinger AJ, Alcorn SR. An Update on the Management of Bone Metastases. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:400-408. [PMID: 38539021 PMCID: PMC11021281 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01515-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Increasing life expectancy among patients with advanced cancer has placed a greater emphasis on optimizing pain control and quality of life. Concurrently, significant advancements in radiotherapy for bone metastases have permitted for dose escalation strategies such as stereotactic radiotherapy. This review aims to provide updated information on the management of bone metastases in light of these developments. RECENT FINDINGS We reviewed recent studies regarding the role and details of external beam radiotherapy for bone metastases, with emphasis on differences by treatment site as well as intention (palliative versus ablative for oligometastases). Conventional palliative radiotherapy remains a mainstay of management. While stereotactic radiotherapy may augment durability of pain relief and even survival time, there are significant questions remaining regarding optimal dosing and patient selection. Radiotherapy for bone metastases continues to evolve, particularly with increasing use of stereotactic radiotherapy. Future studies are needed to clarify optimal dose, fractionation, modality, and patient selection criteria among different radiotherapy approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Grosinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Mail Code 494, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455-0110, USA
| | - Sara R Alcorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Mail Code 494, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455-0110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rijs Z, Kawsar KA, Saha P, van de Sande M, Lui D. Evaluation of computed tomography artefacts of carbon-fiber and titanium implants in patients with spinal oligometastatic disease undergoing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6700. [PMID: 38509154 PMCID: PMC10954645 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52498-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
This study evaluated artefacts on computed tomography (CT) images using Hounsfield units (HU) in patients with spinal oligometastatic disease who received carbon-fiber (CF; n = 11) or titanium (n = 11) spine implants and underwent stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Pre- and postoperative HU were measured at the vertebral body, pedicle, and spinal cord at three different levels: the lower instrumented vertebra, the level of metastatic spinal cord compression, and an uninvolved level. Areas measured at each level were delicately matched pre- and postoperatively. Significant differences in HU were observed at the vertebral body, the pedicle, and the spinal cord at the lowest instrumented vertebra level for both CF and titanium (average increase 1.54-fold and 5.11-fold respectively). At the metastatic spinal cord compression level, a trend towards a higher HU-increase was observed in titanium compared with CF treated patients (average increase 2.51-fold and 1.43-fold respectively). The relatively high postoperative HU-increase after insertion of titanium implants indicated CT artefacts, while the relatively low HU-increase of CF implants was not associated with artefacts. Less CT artefacts could facilitate an easier contouring phase in radiotherapy planning. In addition, we propose a CT artefact grading system based on postoperative HU-increase. This system could serve as a valuable tool in future research to assess if less CT artefacts lead to time savings during radiotherapy treatment planning and, potentially, to better tumoricidal effects and less adverse effects if particle therapy would be administered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeger Rijs
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Priyanshu Saha
- Department of Orthopedic and Spinal Surgery, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michiel van de Sande
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Darren Lui
- Department of Orthopedic and Spinal Surgery, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cao X, Jiang W, Zhang B, Zhao X, Yu H, Lei M, Cao Y, Su X, Liu Y. A New Treatment Strategy for Spinal Metastasis: The "Systemic Conditions, Effectiveness of Systemic Treatment, Neurology, and Oncology" Decision Framework System. Neurosurgery 2024; 94:584-596. [PMID: 37800928 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Treating metastatic spinal tumors poses a significant challenge because there are currently no universally applied guidelines for managing spinal metastases. This study aims to propose a new decision framework for the 12-point epidural spinal cord compression grading system to treat patients with metastatic spinal tumors and investigate its clinical effectiveness in a multicenter analysis. METHODS This study analyzed 940 patients with metastatic spinal tumors between December 2017 and March 2023. The study provided the clinical evidence for the systemic conditions, effectiveness of systemic treatment, neurology, and oncology (SENO) decision framework among spine metastases. The SENO decision framework was launched in January 2021 in our hospitals, classifying patients into 2 groups: The non-SENO group (n = 489) consisted of patients treated between December 2017 and January 2021, while the SENO group (n = 451) comprised patients treated from January 2021 to March 2023. RESULTS Patients in the SENO group were more likely to receive minimally invasive surgery (67.85% vs 58.69%) and less chance of receiving spinal cord circular decompression surgery (14.41% vs 24.74%) than patients in the non-SENO group ( P < .001). Furthermore, patients in the SENO group experienced fewer perioperative complications (9.09% vs 15.34%, P = .004), incurred lower hospitalization costs ( P < .001), had shorter length of hospitalization ( P < .001), and received systematic treatments for tumors earlier ( P < .001). As a result, patients in the SENO group (329.00 [95% CI: 292.06-365.94] days) demonstrated significantly improved survival outcomes compared with those in the non-SENO group (279.00 [95% CI: 256.91-301.09], days) ( P < .001). At 3 months postdischarge, patients in the SENO group reported greater improvements in their quality of life, encompassing physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, when compared with patients in the non-SENO group. CONCLUSION The SENO decision framework is a promising approach for treating patients with metastatic spinal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuyong Cao
- Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
| | - Weihao Jiang
- Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
| | - Bin Zhang
- Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
| | - Xiongwei Zhao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Anhui , China
| | - Haikuan Yu
- Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
- Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing , China
| | - Mingxing Lei
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Hainan , China
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
- Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing , China
| | - Yuncen Cao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
| | - Xiuyun Su
- Intelligent Medical Innovation Institute, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen , China
| | - Yaosheng Liu
- Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Anhui , China
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, PLA General Hospital, Beijing , China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Starling MTM, Thibodeau S, de Sousa CFPM, Restini FCF, Viani GA, Gouveia AG, Mendez LC, Marta GN, Moraes FY. Optimizing Clinical Implementation of Hypofractionation: Comprehensive Evidence Synthesis and Practical Guidelines for Low- and Middle-Income Settings. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:539. [PMID: 38339290 PMCID: PMC10854666 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The global cancer burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), worsens existing disparities, amplified by the rising costs of advanced treatments. The shortage of radiation therapy (RT) services is a significant issue in LMICs. Extended conventional treatment regimens pose significant challenges, especially in resource-limited settings. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (HRT) and ultra-hypofractionated/stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offer promising alternatives by shortening treatment durations. This approach optimizes the utilization of radiotherapy machines, making them more effective in meeting the growing demand for cancer care. Adopting HRT/SBRT holds significant potential, especially in LMICs. This review provides the latest clinical evidence and guideline recommendations for the application of HRT/SBRT in the treatment of breast, prostate, and lung cancers. It emphasizes the critical importance of rigorous training, technology, stringent quality assurance, and safety protocols to ensure precise and secure treatments. Additionally, it addresses practical considerations for implementing these treatments in LMICs, highlighting the need for comprehensive support and collaboration to enhance patient access to advanced cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephane Thibodeau
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | | | | | - Gustavo A. Viani
- Department of Medical Imagings, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Hematology and Oncology of University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, Brazil
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre 90619-900, Brazil
| | - Andre G. Gouveia
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre 90619-900, Brazil
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Lucas C. Mendez
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Gustavo Nader Marta
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Sirio Libanês, Sao Paulo 01308-050, Brazil
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre 90619-900, Brazil
| | - Fabio Ynoe Moraes
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre 90619-900, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wong HCY, Lee SF, Chan AW, Caini S, Hoskin P, Simone CB, Johnstone P, van der Linden Y, van der Velden JM, Martin E, Alcorn S, Johnstone C, Isabelle Choi J, Nader Marta G, Oldenburger E, Raman S, Rembielak A, Vassiliou V, Bonomo P, Nguyen QN, Chow E, Ryu S. Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiother Oncol 2023; 189:109914. [PMID: 37739318 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to compare SBRT and cEBRT for treating spinal metastases through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched up to 6 May 2023 for RCTs comparing SBRT and cEBRT for spinal metastases. Overall and complete pain response, local progression, overall survival, quality of life and adverse events were extracted. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes, and hazard ratios (HRs) for time-to-event outcomes, along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. RESULTS Three RCTs were identified involving 642 patients. No differences were seen in overall pain response comparing SBRT and cEBRT (RR at 3 months: 1.12, 95% CI, 0.74-1.70, p = 0.59; RR at 6 months: 1.29, 95% CI, 0.97-1.72, p = 0.08). Only two of three studies presented complete pain response data. SBRT demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in complete pain response compared to cEBRT (RR at 3 months: 2.52; 95% CI, 1.58-4.01; P < 0.0001; RR at 6 months: 2.48; 95% CI, 1.23-4.99; P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in local progression and overall survival. Adverse events were similar, except for any grade radiation dermatitis, which was significantly lower in SBRT arm (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.96, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION SBRT is a safe treatment option for spine metastases. It may provide better complete pain response compared to cEBRT. Additional trials are needed to determine the potential benefits of SBRT in specific patient subsets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry C Y Wong
- Department of Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kowloon West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong S.A.R., China.
| | - Shing Fung Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore; Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong S.A.R., China
| | - Adrian Wai Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong S.A.R., China
| | - Saverio Caini
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yvette van der Linden
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Centre of Expertise in Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne M van der Velden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Emily Martin
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, LA, USA
| | - Sara Alcorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Candice Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - J Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gustavo Nader Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil; Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Brazil
| | - Eva Oldenburger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Agata Rembielak
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Vassilios Vassiliou
- Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Department of Oncology, Azienda, Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Edward Chow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Samuel Ryu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stony Brook University Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ciérvide R, Hernando O, López M, Montero Á, Zucca D, Sánchez E, Álvarez B, García-Aranda M, Chen Zhao X, Valero J, Alonso R, Martí J, de la Casa MÁ, Alonso L, García J, Garcia de Acilu P, Prado A, Fernandez Leton P, Rubio C. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases: 12 years of a single center experience. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:3395-3404. [PMID: 37058207 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03188-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical outcomes of patients with spine metastases treated with SBRT at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with spine metastases treated with SBRT (1 fraction/18 Gy or 5 fractions/7 Gy) during the last 12 years have been analyzed. All patients were simulated supine in a vacuum cushion or with a shoulder mask. CT scans and MRI image registration were performed. Contouring was based on International Spine-Radiosurgery-Consortium-Consensus-Guidelines. Highly conformal-techniques (IMRT/VMAT) were used for treatment planning. Intra and interfraction (CBCT or X-Ray-ExacTrac) verification were mandatory. RESULTS From February 2010 to January 2022, 129 patients with spinal metastases were treated with SBRT [1 fraction/18 Gy (75%) or 5 fractions/7 Gy] (25%). For patients with painful metastases (74/129:57%), 100% experienced an improvement in pain after SBRT. With a median follow-up of 14.2 months (average 22.9; range 0.5-140) 6 patients (4.6%) experienced local relapse. Local progression-free survival was different, considering metastases's location (p < 0.04). The 1, 2 and 3 years overall survival (OS) were 91.2%, 85.1% and 83.2%, respectively. Overall survival was significantly better for patients with spine metastases of breast and prostate cancers compared to other tumors (p < 0.05) and significantly worse when visceral metastases were present (p < 0.05), when patients were metastatic de novo (p < 0.05), and in those patients receiving single fraction SBRT (p: 0.01). CONCLUSIONS According to our experience, SBRT for patients with spinal metastases was effective in terms of local control and useful to reach pain relief. Regarding the intent of the treatment, an adequate selection of patients is essential to propose this ablative approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Ciérvide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Ovidio Hernando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ángel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Zucca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio Sánchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Álvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariola García-Aranda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Xin Chen Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jeannette Valero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Martí
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Ángel de la Casa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Leire Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan García
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paz Garcia de Acilu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Prado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pedro Fernandez Leton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Rubio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Díaz Silvera CM, Azinovic I, Bolle SLE, Pérez Cobos M, Matute R. Role of radiotherapy in the management of spine metastases. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2023; 67:542-551. [PMID: 37245636 DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Spine metastases are a common cause of pain in the oncologic patient which can generate functional limitation, in addition to complications derived from spinal cord compression, radicular compression and fractures. A complex approach to these metastases is required due to the risk of permanent sequelae. With the increase in survival rates due to new emerging treatments, the possibilities of presenting vertebral metastases are increasing, therefore, the management of these lesions should be aimed at pain relief and maintenance of ambulation. Radiotherapy has a fundamental role in the management of these lesions, and technological advances in recent years have made it possible to improve the quality and intentionality of the treatments, going from having a palliative intent to proposing treatments that improve local control. In this article we describe how the stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) technique, in selected patients, can improve local control and its value in oligometastatic patients and after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Díaz Silvera
- Oncología Radioterápica. Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Madrid, España.
| | - I Azinovic
- Oncología Radioterápica. Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Madrid, España
| | - S L E Bolle
- Oncología radioterápica. Centro de Protonterapia. Quironsalud. Madrid, España
| | - M Pérez Cobos
- Oncología Radioterápica. Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Madrid, España
| | - R Matute
- Oncología radioterápica. Centro de Protonterapia. Quironsalud. Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hallinan JTPD, Zhu L, Tan HWN, Hui SJ, Lim X, Ong BWL, Ong HY, Eide SE, Cheng AJL, Ge S, Kuah T, Lim SWD, Low XZ, Teo EC, Yap QV, Chan YH, Kumar N, Vellayappan BA, Ooi BC, Quek ST, Makmur A, Tan JH. A deep learning-based technique for the diagnosis of epidural spinal cord compression on thoracolumbar CT. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023; 32:3815-3824. [PMID: 37093263 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07706-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a deep learning (DL) model for epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) on CT, which will aid earlier ESCC diagnosis for less experienced clinicians. METHODS We retrospectively collected CT and MRI data from adult patients with suspected ESCC at a tertiary referral institute from 2007 till 2020. A total of 183 patients were used for training/validation of the DL model. A separate test set of 40 patients was used for DL model evaluation and comprised 60 staging CT and matched MRI scans performed with an interval of up to 2 months. DL model performance was compared to eight readers: one musculoskeletal radiologist, two body radiologists, one spine surgeon, and four trainee spine surgeons. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using inter-rater agreement, sensitivity, specificity and AUC. RESULTS Overall, 3115 axial CT slices were assessed. The DL model showed high kappa of 0.872 for normal, low and high-grade ESCC (trichotomous), which was superior compared to a body radiologist (R4, κ = 0.667) and all four trainee spine surgeons (κ range = 0.625-0.838)(all p < 0.001). In addition, for dichotomous normal versus any grade of ESCC detection, the DL model showed high kappa (κ = 0.879), sensitivity (91.82), specificity (92.01) and AUC (0.919), with the latter AUC superior to all readers (AUC range = 0.732-0.859, all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION A deep learning model for the objective assessment of ESCC on CT had comparable or superior performance to radiologists and spine surgeons. Earlier diagnosis of ESCC on CT could reduce treatment delays, which are associated with poor outcomes, increased costs, and reduced survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
| | - Lei Zhu
- Department of Computer Science, School of Computing, National University of Singapore, 13 Computing Drive, Singapore, 117417, Singapore
| | - Hui Wen Natalie Tan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, 1E, Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Si Jian Hui
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, 1E, Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Xinyi Lim
- Orthopaedic Centre, Alexandra Hospital, 378 Alexandra Road, Singapore, 159964, Singapore
| | - Bryan Wei Loong Ong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, 1E, Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Han Yang Ong
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
| | - Sterling Ellis Eide
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
| | - Amanda J L Cheng
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
| | - Shuliang Ge
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
| | - Tricia Kuah
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
| | - Shi Wei Desmond Lim
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
| | - Xi Zhen Low
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
| | - Ee Chin Teo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
| | - Qai Ven Yap
- Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
| | - Yiong Huak Chan
- Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
| | - Naresh Kumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, 1E, Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Balamurugan A Vellayappan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Beng Chin Ooi
- Department of Computer Science, School of Computing, National University of Singapore, 13 Computing Drive, Singapore, 117417, Singapore
| | - Swee Tian Quek
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
| | - Andrew Makmur
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
| | - Jiong Hao Tan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, 1E, Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Díaz Silvera CM, Azinovic I, Bolle SLE, Pérez Cobos M, Matute R. [Translated article] Role of radiotherapy in the management of spine metastases. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2023; 67:S542-S551. [PMID: 37541346 DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Spine metastases are a common cause of pain in the oncologic patient which can generate functional limitation, in addition to complications derived from spinal cord compression, radicular compression and fractures. A complex approach to these metastases is required due to the risk of permanent sequelae. With the increase in survival rates due to new emerging treatments, the possibilities of presenting vertebral metastases are increasing, therefore, the management of these lesions should be aimed at pain relief and maintenance of ambulation. Radiotherapy has a fundamental role in the management of these lesions, and technological advances in recent years have made it possible to improve the quality and intentionality of the treatments, going from having a palliative intent to proposing treatments that improve local control. In this article, we describe how the stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) technique, in selected patients, can improve local control and its value in oligometastatic patients and after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - I Azinovic
- Oncología Radioterápica, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - S L E Bolle
- Oncología Radioterápica, Centro de Protonterapia, Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Pérez Cobos
- Oncología Radioterápica, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Matute
- Oncología Radioterápica, Centro de Protonterapia, Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen Y, Qin S, Zhao W, Wang Q, Liu K, Xin P, Yuan H, Zhuang H, Lang N. MRI feature-based radiomics models to predict treatment outcome after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases. Insights Imaging 2023; 14:169. [PMID: 37817044 PMCID: PMC10564690 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01523-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to extract radiomics features from MRI using machine learning (ML) algorithms and integrate them with clinical features to build response prediction models for patients with spinal metastases undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS Patients with spinal metastases who were treated using SBRT at our hospital between July 2018 and April 2023 were recruited. We assessed their response to treatment using the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). The lesions were categorized into progressive disease (PD) and non-PD groups. Radiomics features were extracted from T1-weighted image (T1WI), T2-weighted image (T2WI), and fat-suppression T2WI sequences. Feature selection involved intraclass correlation coefficients, minimal-redundancy-maximal-relevance, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator methods. Thirteen ML algorithms were employed to construct the radiomics prediction models. Clinical, conventional imaging, and radiomics features were integrated to develop combined models. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the clinical value was assessed using decision curve analysis. RESULTS We included 194 patients with 142 (73.2%) lesions in the non-PD group and 52 (26.8%) in the PD group. Each region of interest generated 2264 features. The clinical model exhibited a moderate predictive value (area under the ROC curve, AUC = 0.733), while the radiomics models demonstrated better performance (AUC = 0.745-0.825). The combined model achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.828). CONCLUSION The MRI-based radiomics models exhibited valuable predictive capability for treatment outcomes in patients with spinal metastases undergoing SBRT. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Radiomics prediction models have the potential to contribute to clinical decision-making and improve the prognosis of patients with spinal metastases undergoing SBRT. KEY POINTS • Stereotactic body radiotherapy effectively delivers high doses of radiation to treat spinal metastases. • Accurate prediction of treatment outcomes has crucial clinical significance. • MRI-based radiomics models demonstrated good performance to predict treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongye Chen
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Siyuan Qin
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Weili Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Qizheng Wang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Ke Liu
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Peijin Xin
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Huishu Yuan
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongqing Zhuang
- Department of radiotherapy, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Ning Lang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Linzey JR, Kathawate VG, Strong MJ, Roche K, Goethe PE, Tudrick LR, Lee J, Tripathy A, Koduri S, Ward AL, Ogunsola O, Zaki MM, Joshi RS, Weyburne G, Mayo CS, Evans JR, Jackson WC, Szerlip NJ. Patients with progression of spinal metastases who present to the clinic have better outcomes compared to those who present to the emergency department. Cancer Med 2023; 12:20177-20187. [PMID: 37776158 PMCID: PMC10587959 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As cancer therapies have improved, spinal metastases are increasingly common. Resulting complications have a significant impact on patient's quality of life. Optimal methods of surveillance and avoidance of neurologic deficits are understudied. This study compares the clinical course of patients who initially presented to the emergency department (ED) versus a multidisciplinary spine oncology clinic and who underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) secondary to progression/presentation of metastatic spine disease. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of adult oncologic patients who underwent spinal SBRT at a single hospital from 2010 to 2021. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were performed. RESULTS We identified 498 spinal radiographic treatment sites in 390 patients. Of these patients, 118 (30.3%) presented to the ED. Patients presenting to the ED compared to the clinic had significantly more severe spinal compression (52.5% vs. 11.7%; p < 0.0001), severe pain (28.8% vs. 10.3%; p < 0.0001), weakness (24.5% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.0001), and difficulty walking (24.5% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.0001). Patients who presented to the ED compared to the clinic were significantly more likely to have surgical intervention followed by SBRT (55.4% vs. 15.3%; p < 0.0001) compared to SBRT alone. Patients who presented to the ED compared to the clinic had a significantly quicker interval to distant spine progression (5.1 ± 6.5 vs. 9.1 ± 10.2 months; p = 0.004), systemic progression (5.1 ± 7.2 vs. 9.2 ± 10.7 months; p < 0.0001), and worse overall survival (9.3 ± 10.0 vs. 14.3 ± 13.7 months; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION The establishment of multidisciplinary spine oncology clinics is an opportunity to potentially allow for earlier, more data-driven treatment of their spinal metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R. Linzey
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | | | - Michael J. Strong
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Kayla Roche
- School of MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Peyton E. Goethe
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Lila R. Tudrick
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Johan Lee
- School of MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Arushi Tripathy
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Sravanthi Koduri
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Ayobami L. Ward
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Oludotun Ogunsola
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Mark M. Zaki
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | | | - Grant Weyburne
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Charles S. Mayo
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Joseph R. Evans
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - William C. Jackson
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Iyengar P, All S, Berry MF, Boike TP, Bradfield L, Dingemans AMC, Feldman J, Gomez DR, Hesketh PJ, Jabbour SK, Jeter M, Josipovic M, Lievens Y, McDonald F, Perez BA, Ricardi U, Ruffini E, De Ruysscher D, Saeed H, Schneider BJ, Senan S, Widder J, Guckenberger M. Treatment of Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ASTRO/ESTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:393-412. [PMID: 37294262 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This joint guideline by American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) was initiated to review evidence and provide recommendations regarding the use of local therapy in the management of extracranial oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Local therapy is defined as the comprehensive treatment of all known cancer-primary tumor, regional nodal metastases, and metastases-with definitive intent. METHODS ASTRO and ESTRO convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the use of local (radiation, surgery, other ablative methods) and systemic therapy in the management of oligometastatic NSCLC. The questions address clinical scenarios for using local therapy, sequencing and timing when integrating local with systemic therapies, radiation techniques critical for oligometastatic disease targeting and treatment delivery, and the role of local therapy for oligoprogression or recurrent disease. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using ASTRO guidelines methodology. RESULTS Based on the lack of significant randomized phase 3 trials, a patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach was strongly recommended for all decision-making regarding potential treatment. Integration of definitive local therapy was only relevant if technically feasible and clinically safe to all disease sites, defined as 5 or fewer distinct sites. Conditional recommendations were given for definitive local therapies in synchronous, metachronous, oligopersistent, and oligoprogressive conditions for extracranial disease. Radiation and surgery were the only primary definitive local therapy modalities recommended for use in the management of patients with oligometastatic disease, with indications provided for choosing one over the other. Sequencing recommendations were provided for systemic and local therapy integration. Finally, multiple recommendations were provided for the optimal technical use of hypofractionated radiation or stereotactic body radiation therapy as definitive local therapy, including dose and fractionation. CONCLUSIONS Presently, data regarding clinical benefits of local therapy on overall and other survival outcomes is still sparse for oligometastatic NSCLC. However, with rapidly evolving data being generated supporting local therapy in oligometastatic NSCLC, this guideline attempted to frame recommendations as a function of the quality of data available to make decisions in a multidisciplinary approach incorporating patient goals and tolerances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puneeth Iyengar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas.
| | - Sean All
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mark F Berry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Thomas P Boike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare/MHP Radiation Oncology, Troy, Michigan
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul J Hesketh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Melenda Jeter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Fiona McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bradford A Perez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Enrico Ruffini
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht and Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hina Saeed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baptist Health South Florida, Boca Raton, Florida
| | - Bryan J Schneider
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Suresh Senan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ong WL, Milne RL, Foroudi F, Millar JL. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spine Metastases-Findings from an Australian Population-Based Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:7777-7788. [PMID: 37623045 PMCID: PMC10453727 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30080564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spine metastases and the associated factors in Australia. Methods: The Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Dataset, which captures all episodes of radiotherapy delivered in the state of Victoria, was accessed to evaluate the patterns and trends of SBRT for spine metastases. The primary outcome was SBRT use and associated factors. Results: There were 6244 patients who received 8861 courses of radiotherapy for spine metastases between 2012 and 2017. Of these, 277 (3%) courses were SBRT, which increased from 0.4% in 2012 to 5% in 2017 (P-trend < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of SBRT use in patients with prostate cancer (6%) and melanoma (4%) compared to other cancers (2-3%) (p < 0.001). Patients from the highest socioeconomic quintiles (5%) were more likely to be treated with SBRT compared to patients from the lowest socioeconomic quintiles (3%) (p < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of SBRT use in private radiotherapy centres (6%) compared to public radiotherapy centres (1%) (p < 0.001). No spine SBRT was delivered in regional centres. In multivariate analyses, the year of treatment, age, primary cancers and radiotherapy centres were independently associated with SBRT use. Conclusion: This is the first Australian population-based study quantifying the increasing use of spine SBRT; however, the overall use of spine SBRT remains low. We anticipate an ongoing increase in spine SBRT, as spine SBRT gradually becomes the standard-of-care treatment for painful spine metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Melbourne 3004, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK
| | - Roger L. Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne 3004, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3053, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg 3084, Australia
| | - Jeremy L. Millar
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Melbourne 3004, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ryu S, Deshmukh S, Timmerman RD, Movsas B, Gerszten P, Yin FF, Dicker A, Abraham CD, Zhong J, Shiao SL, Tuli R, Desai A, Mell LK, Iyengar P, Hitchcock YJ, Allen AM, Burton S, Brown D, Sharp HJ, Dunlap NE, Siddiqui MS, Chen TH, Pugh SL, Kachnic LA. Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Conventional Radiotherapy for Localized Vertebral Metastases of the Spine: Phase 3 Results of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0631 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:800-807. [PMID: 37079324 PMCID: PMC10119775 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
Importance Spine metastasis can be treated with high-dose radiation therapy with advanced delivery technology for long-term tumor and pain control. Objective To assess whether patient-reported pain relief was improved with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) for patients with 1 to 3 sites of vertebral metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants In this randomized clinical trial, patients with 1 to 3 vertebral metastases were randomized 2:1 to the SRS or cEBRT groups. This NRG 0631 phase 3 study was performed as multi-institutional enrollment within NRG Oncology. Eligibility criteria included the following: (1) solitary vertebral metastasis, (2) 2 contiguous vertebral levels involved, or (3) maximum of 3 separate sites. Each site may involve up to 2 contiguous vertebral bodies. A total of 353 patients enrolled in the trial, and 339 patients were analyzed. This analysis includes data extracted on March 9, 2020. Interventions Patients randomized to the SRS group were treated with a single dose of 16 or 18 Gy (to convert to rad, multiply by 100) given to the involved vertebral level(s) only, not including any additional spine levels. Patients assigned to cEBRT were treated with 8 Gy given to the involved vertebra plus 1 additional vertebra above and below. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was patient-reported pain response defined as at least a 3-point improvement on the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) without worsening in pain at the secondary site(s) or the use of pain medication. Secondary end points included treatment-related toxic effects, quality of life, and long-term effects on vertebral bone and spinal cord. Results A total of 339 patients (mean [SD] age of SRS group vs cEBRT group, respectively, 61.9 [13.1] years vs 63.7 [11.9] years; 114 [54.5%] male in SRS group vs 70 [53.8%] male in cEBRT group) were analyzed. The baseline mean (SD) pain score at the index vertebra was 6.06 (2.61) in the SRS group and 5.88 (2.41) in the cEBRT group. The primary end point of pain response at 3 months favored cEBRT (41.3% for SRS vs 60.5% for cEBRT; difference, -19 percentage points; 95% CI, -32.9 to -5.5; 1-sided P = .99; 2-sided P = .01). Zubrod score (a measure of performance status ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being fully functional and asymptomatic, and 4 being bedridden) was the significant factor influencing pain response. There were no differences in the proportion of acute or late adverse effects. Vertebral compression fracture at 24 months was 19.5% with SRS and 21.6% with cEBRT (P = .59). There were no spinal cord complications reported at 24 months. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, superiority of SRS for the primary end point of patient-reported pain response at 3 months was not found, and there were no spinal cord complications at 2 years after SRS. This finding may inform further investigation of using spine radiosurgery in the setting of oligometastases, where durability of cancer control is essential. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00922974.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Ryu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Snehal Deshmukh
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Peter Gerszten
- University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Adam Dicker
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jim Zhong
- Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Anand Desai
- Summa Akron City Hospital/Cooper Cancer Center, Akron, Ohio
| | - Loren K. Mell
- University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla
| | - Puneeth Iyengar
- University of Texas Southwestern/Simmons Cancer Center–Dallas
| | | | | | - Steven Burton
- University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Doris Brown
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | | | - Neal E. Dunlap
- The James Graham Brown Cancer Center at University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | | | | | - Stephanie L. Pugh
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lisa A. Kachnic
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ohira S, Ikawa T, Inui S, Kanayama N, Ueda Y, Miyazaki M, Nishio T, Koizumi M, Konishi K. Improvement of target coverage using automated non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy planning in stereotactic radiotherapy for cervical metastatic spinal tumors. Med Dosim 2023:S0958-3947(23)00039-0. [PMID: 37202230 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to compare dosimetric parameters for targets and organs at risk (OARs) between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and automated VMAT (HyperArc, HA) plans in stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with cervical metastatic spine tumors. VMAT plans were generated for 11 metastases using the simultaneous integrated boost technique to deliver 35 to 40 and 20 to 25 Gy for high dose and elective dose planning target volume (PTVHD and PTVED), respectively. The HA plans were retrospectively generated using 1 coplanar and 2 noncoplanar arcs. Subsequently, the doses to the targets and OARs were compared. The HA plans provided significantly higher (p < 0.05) Dmin (77.4 ± 13.1%), D99% (89.3 ± 8.9%), and D98% (92.5 ± 7.7%) for gross tumor volume (GTV) than those of the VMAT plans (73.4 ± 12.2%, 84.2 ± 9.6 and 87.3 ± 8.8% for Dmin, D99% and D98%, respectively). In addition, D99% and D98% for PTVHD were significantly higher in the HA plans, whereas dosimetric parameters were comparable between the HA and VMAT plans for PTVED. The Dmax values for the brachial plexus, esophagus, and spinal cord were comparable, and no significant difference was observed in the Dmean for the larynx, pharyngeal constrictor, thyroid, parotid grand (left and right), and Submandibular gland (left and right). The HA plans provided significantly higher target coverage of GTV and PTVHD, with a comparable dose for OARs with VMAT plans. The results of this study may contribute to the improvement of local control in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shingo Ohira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan; Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
| | - Toshiki Ikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shoki Inui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Kanayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ueda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Miyazaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Teiji Nishio
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Masahiko Koizumi
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Iramina H, Nakamura M, Nakamura K, Fujimoto T, Mizowaki T. Quantification of six-degree-of-freedom motion during beam delivery in spine stereotactic body radiotherapy using intra-irradiation cone-beam computed tomography imaging technique. Phys Med 2023; 110:102605. [PMID: 37167776 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Quantifying intra-fractional six-degree-of-freedom (6DoF) residual errors or motion from approved patient setups is necessary for accurate beam delivery in spine stereotactic body radiotherapy. However, previously reported errors were not acquired during beam delivery. Therefore, we aimed to quantify the 6DoF residual errors and motions during arc beam delivery using a concurrent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging technique, intra-irradiation CBCT. METHODS Consecutive 15 patients, 19 plans for various treatment sites, and 199 CBCT images were analyzed. Pre-irradiation CBCT was performed to verify shifts from the initial patient setup using the ExacTrac system. During beam delivery by two or three co-planar full-arc rotations, CBCT imaging was performed concurrently. Subsequently, an intra-irradiation CBCT image was reconstructed. Pre- and intra-irradiation CBCT images were rigidly registered to a planning CT image based on the bone to quantify 6DoF residual errors. RESULTS 6DoF residual errors quantified using pre- and intra-irradiation CBCTs were within 2.0 mm/2.0°, except for one measurement. The mean elapsed time (mean ± standard deviation [min:sec]) after pre-irradiation CBCT to the end of the last arc beam delivery was 6:08 ± 1:25 and 7:54 ± 2:14 for the 2- and 3-arc plans, respectively. Root mean squares of residual errors for several directions showed significant differences; however, they were within 1.0 mm/1.0°. Time-dependent analysis revealed that the residual errors tended to increase with elapsed time. CONCLUSION The errors represent the optimal intra-fractional error compared with those acquired using the pre-, inter-beam, and post-6DoF image guidance and can be acquired within a standard treatment timeslot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiraku Iramina
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Advanced Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Kiyonao Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Takahiro Fujimoto
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li J, Kong X, cheng C, Wang G, Zhuang H, Yang R. Comparison between supine and prone patient setup for lumbosacral spinal stereotactic body radiosurgery with CyberKnife. Front Oncol 2023; 13:959447. [PMID: 37077832 PMCID: PMC10106579 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.959447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to analyze which tracking modality is more suitable for stereotactic body radiosurgery of lumbosacral spinal tumors by comparing prone and supine patient treatment setup.MethodsEighteen patients with lumbosacral spinal tumors were selected. CT simulation was performed in the supine position (fixed with a vacuum cushion) and prone position (fixed with a thermoplastic mask and prone plate), respectively. The plans in the supine and prone positions were designed using the xsight spine tracking (XST) and xsight spine prone tracking (XSPT) modalities, respectively. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, namely, V100%, D95%, Dmean, conformity index (CI), and heterogeneity index (HI) in planning target volume (PTV), as well as Dmax, D0.1cc, D1cc, and D5cc in the cauda equina and bowel were recorded. The supine plans were simulation plans and were not used for treatment, which were only used to record the alignment errors. The spinal tracking correction errors (alignment error) and correlation errors of the synchrony respiratory model in the prone position were recorded during the treatment. After treatment, the simulation plan of the supine position was implemented and the spinal tracking correction errors were recorded. The parameters of correction error and DVH parameters for the two positions were analyzed using the paired t-test to compare the difference in positioning accuracy and dose distribution. In addition, the correlation errors of the synchrony respiratory model in the prone position were analyzed to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the synchrony model.ResultsFor patient setup, the correction error of the supine position in interior/posterior was (0.18 ± 0.16) mm and the prone position was (0.31 ± 0.26) mm (P< 0.05). The correction error of the supine position in inferior/superior was (0.27 ± 0.24) mm, and the prone position was (0.5 ± 0.4) mm (P< 0.05). The average correlation errors of the synchrony model for left/right, inferior/superior, and anterior/posterior in the prone position were (0.21 ± 0.11) mm, (0.41 ± 0.38) mm, and (0.68 ± 0.42) mm, respectively. For the dose distribution, compared with prone plans, the average CI in supine plans was increased by 4.5% (P< 0.05). There was no significant difference in HI, PTV V100%, D95%, and Dmean between the prone and supine plans. Compared with supine plans, average D1cc and D5cc for the cauda equina was significantly decreased by 4.7 and 15.3% in the prone plan (P< 0.05). For the bowel, average Dmax, D0.1cc, D1cc, and D5cc were reduced by 8.0, 7.7, 5.2, and 26.6% in prone plans (P< 0.05) compared with supine plans.ConclusionCompared with the supine setup, the prone setup combined with XSPT modality for the lumbosacral spinal stereotactic body radiosurgery can spare the bowel and cauda equina of the middle and low dose irradiation, and decrease the number of beams and monitor units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xianghui Kong
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou, China
| | - Cheng cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Gong Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongqing Zhuang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Hongqing Zhuang, ; Ruijie Yang,
| | - Ruijie Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Hongqing Zhuang, ; Ruijie Yang,
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Anokwute MC, Preda V, Di Ieva A. Determining Contemporary Barriers to Effective Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Neurological Surgery: A Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg 2023; 172:73-80. [PMID: 36754351 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.01.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The integration of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) for neurosurgical care has been accepted worldwide. Our objective was to review the literature for the limiting factors to MDTMs that may introduce bias to patient care. METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis was used to perform a literature review of MDTMs for neuro-oncology, pituitary oncology, cerebrovascular surgery, and spine surgery and spine oncology. Limiting factors to productive MDTMs and factors that introduce bias were identified, as well as determining whether MDTMs led to improved patient outcomes. RESULTS We identified 1264 manuscripts from a PubMed and Ovid Medline search, of which 27 of 500 neuro-oncology, 4 of 279 pituitary, and 11 of 260 spine surgery articles met our inclusion criteria. Of 224 cerebrovascular manuscripts, none met the criteria. Factors for productive MDTMs included quaternary/tertiary referral centers, nonhierarchical environment, regularly scheduled meetings, concise inclusion of nonmedical factors at the same level of importance as patient clinical information, inclusion of nonclinical participants, and use of clinical guidelines and institutional protocols to provide recommendations. Our review did not identify literature that described the use of artificial intelligence to reduce bias and guide clinical care. CONCLUSIONS The continued implementation of MDTMs in neurosurgery should be recommended but cautioned by limiting bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miracle C Anokwute
- Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Veronica Preda
- Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Antonio Di Ieva
- Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Computational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ratnakumaran R, van As N, Khoo V, McDonald F, Tait D, Ahmed M, Taylor H, Griffin C, Dunne EM, Tree AC. Patterns of Failure After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Sacral Metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:339-346. [PMID: 36805131 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat sacral metastases. We analysed our centre's local relapse rates and patterns of failure after sacral SBRT and assessed whether using the consensus contouring recommendation (CCR) may have prevented local relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a single-centre retrospective review of patients treated with sacral SBRT between February 2012 and December 2021. The cumulative incidence of local relapse, patterns of failure and overall survival were determined. Two investigators reviewed planning computed tomography scans and imaging at relapse to determine if local relapse was potentially preventable with a larger CCR-derived radiotherapy field. RESULTS In total, 34 patients received sacral SBRT, with doses ranging from 24 to 40 Gy over three to five fractions. The most frequently used schedule was 30 Gy in three fractions. Common primaries treated included prostate (n = 16), breast (n = 6), lung (n = 3) and renal (n = 3) cancers. The median follow-up was 20 months (interquartile range 13-55 months). The cumulative incidence of local relapse (4/34) was 2.9% (95% confidence interval 0.2-13.2), 6.3% (95% confidence interval 1.1-18.5) and 16.8% (95% confidence interval 4.7-35.4) at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years, respectively. The patterns of failure were local-only (1/34), local and distant (3/34) and distant relapse (10/34). The overall survival was 96.7% (95% confidence interval 90.5-100) and 90.6% (95% confidence interval 78.6-100) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. For prostate/breast primaries, the cumulative incidence of local relapse was 4.5% (95% confidence interval 0.3-19.4), 4.5% (95% confidence interval 0.3-19.4) and 12.5% (95% confidence interval 1.7-34.8) at 6 months, 1 and 2 years, respectively. Twenty-nine cases (85.3%) deviated from the CCR. Sacral relapse was potentially preventable if the CCR was used in one patient (2.9% of the whole cohort and 25% of the relapsed cohort). DISCUSSION We have shown excellent local control rates with sacral SBRT, which was largely planned with a margin expansion approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ratnakumaran
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - N van As
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - F McDonald
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Tait
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Ahmed
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - H Taylor
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - C Griffin
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, London, UK
| | - E M Dunne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A C Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Eysenbach G, Zhai S, Liu X, Chu H, Wei F. The Outcomes of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment in Patients With Spinal Metastases of Lung Cancer: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e38273. [PMID: 36716088 PMCID: PMC9926339 DOI: 10.2196/38273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal metastases of lung cancer (SMLC) usually have a high degree of malignancy and require multimodality treatment. Patients with SMLC who experience clinical symptoms (eg, local pain, emerging or potential spinal instability, and progressive neurological dysfunction) require surgical treatment. However, there are discrepancies in the comparison of outcomes between surgical treatment and nonsurgical treatment. OBJECTIVE This paper presents the protocol for a study that aims to compare the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment and nonsurgical treatment for SMLC, explore the prognostic factors of SMLC, and establish a survival prediction model based on these prognostic factors. METHODS This is a prospective cohort study, with an anticipated sample size of 240 patients (120 patients in the surgical group and 120 patients in the nonsurgical group). We will collect baseline data, including demographic, clinical, and radiological information, as well as data from patient-reported questionnaires. Patients will be followed up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, and survival status will be assessed every 3 months. The primary outcome is the overall survival period. Prognostic factors associated with overall survival will be analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. Odds ratios with 95% CIs will be presented. Statistical significance is set at P<.05. RESULTS This study has been approved by our institute's Medical Science Research Ethics Committee (IRB00006761-M2021085) after a careful audit of the design and content. Patient enrollment began in June 2022 at our hospital. Data collection is expected to be completed by early 2026, and the study results will be published by mid-2027. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we propose to set up a prospective cohort of patients with SMLC to investigate the outcomes between surgical treatment and nonsurgical treatment. We will explore the role of surgical treatment in SMLC and provide guidance to peer surgeons. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100048151; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=129450. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/38273.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shuheng Zhai
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.,Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoxie Liu
- Department of Rehabilitation, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongling Chu
- Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Wei
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.,Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Implementation of triggered kilovoltage imaging for stereotactic radiotherapy of the spine for patients with spinal fixation hardware. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 25:100422. [PMID: 36875327 PMCID: PMC9978845 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Mitigation of intrafraction motion (IM) is valuable in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) radiotherapy where submillimeter accuracy is desired. The purpose of this study was to investigate the application of triggered kilovoltage (kV) imaging for spine SRT patients with hardware by correlating kV imaging with patient motion and summarizing implications of tolerance for IM based on calculated dose. Materials and methods Ten plans (33 fractions) were studied, correlating kV imaging during treatment with pre- and post-treatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Images were taken at 20-degree gantry angle intervals during the arc-based treatment. The contour of the hardware with a 1 mm expansion was displayed at the treatment console to manually pause treatment delivery if the hardware was visually detected outside the contour. The treatment CBCTs were compared using retrospective image registration to assess the validity of contour-based method for pausing treatment. Finally, plans were generated to estimate dose volume objective differences in case of 1 mm deviation. Results When kV imaging during treatment was used with the 1 mm contour, 100 % of the post-treatment CBCTs reported consistent results. One patient in the cohort exhibited motion greater than 1 mm during treatment which allowed intervention and re-setup during treatment. The average translational motion was 0.35 mm. Treatment plan comparison at 1 mm deviation showed little differences in calculated dose for the target and cord. Conclusions Utilizing kV imaging during treatment is an effective method of assessing IM for SRT spine patients with hardware without increasing treatment time.
Collapse
|
25
|
Deodato F, Pezzulla D, Cilla S, Ferro M, Giannini R, Romano C, Boccardi M, Buwenge M, Valentini V, Morganti AG, Macchia G. Volumetric Intensity-Modulated Arc Stereotactic Radiosurgery Boost in Oligometastatic Patients with Spine Metastases: a Dose-escalation Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e30-e39. [PMID: 36207236 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.09.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To report the final results of a dose-escalation study of volumetric intensity-modulated arc stereotactic radiosurgery (VMAT-SRS) boost after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in patients with spine metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Oligometastatic cancer patients bearing up to five synchronous metastases (visceral or bone, including vertebral ones) and candidates for surgery or radiosurgery were considered for inclusion. 25 Gy was delivered in 10 daily fractions (2 weeks) to the metastatic lesion, affected vertebrae and adjacent ones (one cranial and one caudal vertebra). Sequentially, the dose to spinal metastases was progressively increased (8 Gy, 10 Gy, 12 Gy) in the patient cohorts. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as any treatment-related non-hematologic acute adverse effects rated as grade ≥3 or any acute haematological toxicity rated as ≥ 4 by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale. RESULTS Fifty-two lesions accounting for 40 consecutive patients (male/female: 29/11; median age: 71 years; range 40-85) were treated from April 2011 to September 2020. Most patients had a primary prostate (65.0%) or breast cancer (22.5%). Thirty-two patients received 8 Gy VMAT-SRS boost (total BED α/β10: 45.6 Gy), 14 patients received 10 Gy (total BED α/β10: 51.2 Gy) and six patients received 12 Gy (total BED α/β10: 57.6 Gy). The median follow-up time was over 70 months (range 2-240 months). No acute toxicities > grade 2 and no late toxicities > grade 1 were recorded. The overall response rate based on computed tomography/positron emission tomography-computed tomography/magnetic resonance was 78.8%. The 24-month actuarial local control, distant metastases-free survival and overall survival rates were 88.5%, 27.1% and 90.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION A 12 Gy spine metastasis SRS boost following 25 Gy to the affected and adjacent vertebrae was feasible with an excellent local control rate and toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy; Radiology Institute, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - D Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - S Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - M Ferro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - R Giannini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy.
| | - C Romano
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - M Boccardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - M Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - V Valentini
- Radiology Institute, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy.
| | - A G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - G Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang HH, Tian SS, Yang JM, Sun BS, Chen Y, Song YC, Dong Y, Wang JS, Yuan ZY, Cui YL, Meng MB. Risk-adapted stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with cervical spinal metastases. Cancer Sci 2022; 113:4277-4288. [PMID: 36056609 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Owing to the complex anatomical structure and biomechanics, the current standard palliative treatments for cervical spinal metastases are associated with a high risk of recurrence and complications. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can provide radical dose to tumors while protecting normal organs to the maximum extent. However, the efficacy and safety of SBRT for cervical spinal metastases is not well characterized. Data from 71 patients with cervical spine metastases who were treated with SBRT using CyberKnife between 2006 and 2021 were obtained from our prospectively maintained database. Primary endpoint was pain response at 12 weeks following SBRT completion; secondary endpoints included local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Standard-risk patients were planned to receive 30 Gy (range 21-36) with median fractions of 3 (range 1-3) and high-risk patients 35 Gy (range 24-50) with median fractions of 5 (range 4-5) according to the spinal cord and esophagus dose constraints. The median follow-up time was 17.07 months (range 3.1-118.9). After 12 weeks of SBRT completion, 54 (98.2%) of 55 patients with baseline pain achieved pain response and 46 (83.6%) achieved complete pain response. LC rates were 93.1% and 90% at 1 year and 2 year, respectively. The 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 66.2% and 37.4%, respectively. Eight patients experienced grades 1-4 adverse events (six vertebral compression fracture [VCF], five of them had VCF before SBRT; and two hemiparesis). No grade 5 adverse events were observed. Therefore, risk-adapted SBRT for cervical spine metastases achieved high pain control and LC rates with acceptable adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan-Huan Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy and CyberKnife Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Shou-Sen Tian
- Department of Radiotherapy and CyberKnife Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jia-Min Yang
- Department of Radiotherapy and CyberKnife Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Bing-Sheng Sun
- Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Ying Chen
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yong-Chun Song
- Department of Radiotherapy and CyberKnife Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Dong
- Department of Radiotherapy and CyberKnife Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jing-Sheng Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy and CyberKnife Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhi-Yong Yuan
- Department of Radiotherapy and CyberKnife Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yao-Li Cui
- Department of Lymphoma, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Mao-Bin Meng
- Department of Radiotherapy and CyberKnife Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yumioka T, Morizane S, Makishima K, Adachi T, Moriyasu E, Iwamoto H, Hikita K, Honda M, Umekita Y, Takenaka A. Brain and spinal cord metastases with seminoma: A case report. IJU Case Rep 2022; 5:464-468. [PMID: 36341180 PMCID: PMC9626331 DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Brain and spinal cord metastases from testicular cancer occur rarely, and metastases with seminoma are extremely rare. Case presentation A 42‐year‐old man who was diagnosed with seminoma and multiple metastases underwent first‐line and salvage chemotherapy. Brain metastases were noted; consequently, surgery, third‐line chemotherapy, and whole‐brain irradiation were performed. Subsequently, paralysis developed, and spinal cord metastases were detected. He received fourth‐line chemotherapy but died. Pathological autopsy revealed metastases only in the spinal cord. The cause of death was considered respiratory failure due to cervical spinal cord involvement from spinal metastases. Conclusion Brain and spinal cord metastases from seminoma are rare. Thus, similar future cases should be treated appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Yumioka
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Tottori University Tottori Japan
| | - Shuichi Morizane
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Tottori University Tottori Japan
| | - Karen Makishima
- Division of Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Tottori University Tottori Japan
| | - Tadashi Adachi
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine Tottori University Tottori Japan
| | - Emika Moriyasu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Tottori University Tottori Japan
| | - Hideto Iwamoto
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Tottori University Tottori Japan
| | - Katsuya Hikita
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Tottori University Tottori Japan
| | - Masashi Honda
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Tottori University Tottori Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Umekita
- Division of Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Tottori University Tottori Japan
| | - Atsushi Takenaka
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Tottori University Tottori Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lucido JJ, Mullikin TC, Abraha F, Harmsen WS, Vaishnav BD, Brinkman DH, Kowalchuk RO, Marion JT, Johnson-Tesch BA, Sherif OE, Brown PD, Rose PS, Owen D, Morris JM, Waddle MR, Siontis BL, Stish BJ, Pafundi DH, Laack NN, Olivier KR, Park SS, Merrell KW. Single and multi-fraction spine stereotactic body radiation therapy and the risk of radiation induced myelopathy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:101047. [PMID: 36188436 PMCID: PMC9515434 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study reports on the risk of radiation-induced myelitis (RM) of the spinal cord from a large single-institutional experience with 1 to 5 fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the spine. Methods and Materials A retrospective review of patients who received spine SBRT to a radiation naïve level at or above the conus medullaris between 2007 and 2019 was performed. Local failure determination was based on SPIne response assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. RM was defined as neurologic symptoms consistent with the segment of cord irradiated in the absence of neoplastic disease recurrence and graded by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Rates of adverse events were estimated and dose-volume statistics from delivered treatment plans were extracted for the planning target volumes and spinal cord. Results A total of 353 lesions in 277 patients were identified that met the specified criteria, for which 270, 70, and 13 lesions received 1-, 3-, and 5-fraction treatments, respectively, with a median follow-up of 46 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-52 months) for all surviving patients. The median overall survival was 33.0 months (95% CI, 29-43). The median D0.03cc to the spinal cord was 11.7 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 10.5-12.4), 16.7 Gy (IQR, 12.8-20.6), and 26.0 Gy (IQR, 24.1-28.1), for 1-, 3-, 5-fractions. Using an a/b = 2Gy for the spinal cord, the median single-fraction equivalent-dose (SFED2) was 11.7 Gy (IQR, 10.2-12.5 Gy) and the normalized biological equivalent dose (nBED2/2) was 19.9 Gy (IQR, 15.4-22.8 Gy). One patient experienced grade 2 RM after a single-fraction treatment. The cumulative probability of RM was 0.3% (95% CI, 0%-2%). Conclusions Spine SBRT is safe while limiting the spinal cord (as defined on treatment planning magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography myelogram) D0.03cc to less than 14 Gy, 21.9 Gy, and 30 Gy, for 1, 3, and 5-fractions, consistent with standard guidelines.
Collapse
|
29
|
Radiation myelopathy following stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine metastases. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:23-31. [PMID: 35737172 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04037-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now considered a standard of care treatment option in the management of spine metastases. One of the most feared complications of spine SBRT is radiation myelopathy (RM). METHODS We provided a narrative review of RM following spine SBRT based on review of the published literature, including data on spinal cord dose constraints associated with the risk of RM, strategies to mitigate the risk, and management options for RM. RESULTS There are limited published data of cases of RM following spine SBRT with detailed spinal cord dosimetry. The HyTEC report provided recommendations for the point maximal dose (Dmax) for the spinal cord that is associated with a < 5% risk of RM for 1-5 fractions spine SBRT. In the setting of spine SBRT reirradiation after previous conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT), factors associated with RM are: SBRT spinal cord Dmax, cumulative spinal cord Dmax, and the time interval between previous RT and SBRT reirradiation. There are various strategies to mitigate the risk of RM, including accurate delineation of the spinal cord (or thecal sac), strict adherence to the recommended spinal cord dose constraints, and robust treatment immobilisation set-up and delivery. Limited effective treatment options are available for patients who develop RM, and these include corticosteroids, hyperbaric oxygen, and bevacizumab; however, none have been supported by high quality evidence. CONCLUSION RM is a rare but devastating complication following SBRT for spine metastases. There are strategies to minimise the risk of RM to ensure safe delivery of spine SBRT.
Collapse
|
30
|
In reply to Cassidy et al. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e460-e462. [PMID: 35718074 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
31
|
Wang Z, Xiao H, Dong J, Li Y, Wang B, Chen Z, Zeng X, Liu J, Dong Y, Ma L, Xu J, Cheng L, Li C, Liu X, Cui M. Sexual dimorphism in gut microbiota dictates therapeutic efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin on radiotherapy complications. J Adv Res 2022; 46:123-133. [PMID: 35700918 PMCID: PMC10105085 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the mounting number of cancer survivors, the complications following cancer treatment become novel conundrums and starve for countermeasures. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is a purified preparation for immune-deficient and autoimmune conditions. OBJECTIVES Here, we investigated whether IVIg could be employed to fight against radiation injuries and explored the underlying mechanism. METHODS Hematopoietic or gastrointestinal (GI) tract toxicity was induced by total body or abdominal local irradiation. High-throughput sequencing was performed to analyze the gut microbiota configurations and gene expression profile of small intestine. The untargeted metabolomics of gut microbiome was assessed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analyses. Hydrodynamic-based gene delivery was used to knockdown the target genes in vivo. RESULTS Intravenous injection of IVIg protected against radiation-induced hematopoietic and GI tract toxicity in female mice but not in males. IVIg structured sex-characteristic gut microbiota configurations in abdominal irradiated mice. The irradiation enriched gut Lachnospiraceae in female mice but reduced those in males. IVIg injection combined with oral gavage of Lachnospiraceae or its metabolite hypoxanthine, alleviated radiation toxicity in male mice however, Lachnospiraceae or hypoxanthine alone failed to ameliorate the injuries. Abdominal local irradiation drove sex-distinct gene expression signatures in small intestine. Mechanistic investigation showed that replenishment of Lachnospiraceae or hypoxanthine offset abdominal radiation-reduced PLD1 expression in male mice. In females, irradiation elevated PLD1 expression. Deletion of PLD1 in GI tract of female mice erased the radioprotective effects of IVIg. CONCLUSION IVIg battles against radiation injuries in a sex-specific, gut microbiome-dependent way through Lachnospiraceae/hypoxanthine/PLD1 axis. Our findings provide a sex-precise therapeutic avenue to improve the prognosis of cancer patients with radiotherapy in pre-clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zongkui Wang
- Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, 610052, China
| | - Huiwen Xiao
- Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China
| | - Jiali Dong
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China
| | - Yuan Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China
| | - Zhiyuan Chen
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China
| | - Xiaozhou Zeng
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China
| | - Jia Liu
- Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China
| | - Yanxi Dong
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China
| | - Li Ma
- Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, 610052, China
| | - Jun Xu
- Shanghai RAAS Blood products Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201401, China
| | - Lu Cheng
- Shanghai RAAS Blood products Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201401, China
| | - Changqing Li
- Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, 610052, China.
| | - Xingzhong Liu
- Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
| | - Ming Cui
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Volpe F, Piscopo L, Manganelli M, Falzarano M, Volpicelli F, Nappi C, Imbriaco M, Cuocolo A, Klain M. Intramedullary Spinal Cord Metastases from Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, a Case Report. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:863. [PMID: 35743894 PMCID: PMC9225536 DOI: 10.3390/life12060863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Intramedullary spinal cord metastases (ISCM) are uncommon metastases of the spinal cord. Magnetic resonance (MR) plays an important role in surgical planning when ISCM is suspected in the differential diagnosis. The incidence of ISCM is expected to increase due to the longer survival of cancer patients as well as the widespread use of MR in the diagnosis of neurological syndromes. The management of these patients is controversial because of the multiple clinical presentations and lack of controlled studies on the efficacy of different therapeutic approaches. Increased awareness of this rare entity may lead to an earlier diagnosis with novel imaging approaches at a stage when neurological deficits are reversible. A case of ISCM in a 49-year-old patient with differentiated thyroid cancer is reported.
Collapse
|
33
|
Guo L, Ke L, Zeng Z, Yuan C, Wu Z, Chen L, Lu L. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a review. Med Oncol 2022; 39:103. [DOI: 10.1007/s12032-021-01613-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
34
|
Ito K, Nakajima Y, Ikuta S. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal oligometastases: a review on patient selection and the optimal methodology. Jpn J Radiol 2022; 40:1017-1023. [PMID: 35396669 PMCID: PMC9529679 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01277-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has excellent local control and low toxicity for spinal metastases and is widely performed for spinal oligometastases. However, its additional survival benefit to standard of care, including systemic therapy, is unknown because the results of large-scale randomized controlled trials regarding SBRT for oligometastases have not been reported. Consequently, the optimal patient population among those with spinal oligometastases and the optimal methodology for spine SBRT remain unclear. The present review article discusses two topics: evidence-based optimal patient selection and methodology. The following have been reported to be good prognostic factors: young age, good performance status, slow-growing disease with a long disease-free interval, minimal disease burden, and mild fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in positron emission tomography. In addition, we proposed four measures as the optimal SBRT method for achieving excellent local control: (i) required target delineation; (ii) recommended dose fraction schedule (20 or 24 Gy in a single fraction for spinal oligometastases and 35 Gy in five fractions for lesions located near the spinal cord); (iii) optimizing dose distribution for the target; (iv) dose constraint options for the spinal cord.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Ito
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677 Japan
| | - Yujiro Nakajima
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677 Japan
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Komazawa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Syuzo Ikuta
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Efficacy of an esophageal spacer for spine radiosurgery—first experience. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e312-e316. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
36
|
Kowalchuk RO, Johnson-Tesch BA, Marion JT, Mullikin TC, Harmsen WS, Rose PS, Siontis BL, Kim DK, Costello BA, Morris JM, Gao RW, Shiraishi S, Lucido JJ, Sio TT, Trifiletti DM, Olivier KR, Owen D, Stish BJ, Waddle MR, Laack NN, Park SS, Brown PD, Merrell KW. Development and Assessment of a Predictive Score for Vertebral Compression Fracture After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:412-419. [PMID: 35084429 PMCID: PMC8796057 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.7008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is a potential adverse effect following treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases. OBJECTIVE To develop and assess a risk stratification model for VCF after SBRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study conducted at a high-volume referral center included 331 patients who had undergone 464 spine SBRT treatments from December 2007 through October 2019. Data analysis was conducted from November 1, 2020, to August 17, 2021. Exclusions included proton therapy, prior surgical intervention, vertebroplasty, or missing data. EXPOSURES One and 3 fraction spine SBRT treatments were most commonly delivered. Single-fraction treatments generally involved prescribed doses of 16 to 24 Gy (median, 20 Gy; range, 16-30 Gy) to gross disease compared with multifraction treatment that delivered a median of 30 Gy (range, 21-50 Gy). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The VCF and radiography components of the spinal instability neoplastic score were determined by a radiologist. Recursive partitioning analysis was conducted using separate training (70%), internal validation (15%), and test (15%) sets. The log-rank test was the criterion for node splitting. RESULTS Of the 331 participants, 88 were women (27%), and the mean (IQR) age was 63 (59-72) years. With a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR, 11-39 months), we identified 84 VCFs (18%), including 65 (77%) de novo and 19 (23%) progressive fractures. There was a median of 9 months (IQR, 3-21 months) to developing a VCF. From 15 candidate variables, 6 were identified using the backward selection method, feature importance testing, and a correlation heatmap. Four were selected via recursive partitioning analysis: epidural tumor extension, lumbar location, gross tumor volume of more than 10 cc, and a spinal instability neoplastic score of more than 6. One point was assigned to each variable, and the resulting multivariable Cox model had a concordance of 0.760. The hazard ratio per 1-point increase for VCF was 1.93 (95% CI, 1.62-2.30; P < .001). The cumulative incidence of VCF at 2 years (with death as a competing risk) was 6.7% (95% CI, 4.2%-10.7%) for low-risk (score, 0-1; 273 [58.3%]), 17.0% (95% CI, 10.8%-26.7%) for intermediate-risk (score, 2; 99 [21.3%]), and 35.4% (95% CI, 26.7%-46.9%) for high-risk cases (score, 3-4; 92 [19.8%]) (P < .001). Similar results were observed for freedom from VCF using stratification. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of this cohort study identify a subgroup of patients with high risk for VCF following treatment with SBRT who may potentially benefit from undergoing prophylactic spinal stabilization or vertebroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Trey C. Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - William S. Harmsen
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Peter S. Rose
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Dong Kun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Robert W. Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Satomi Shiraishi
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John J. Lucido
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Terence T. Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bradley J. Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mark R. Waddle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nadia N. Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sean S. Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Paul D. Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tjong M, Louie A, Singh A, Videtic G, Stephans K, Plumridge N, Harden S, Slotman B, Alongi F, Guckenberger M, Siva S. Single-Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy to the Lung – The Knockout Punch. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:e183-e194. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
38
|
Massaad E, Duvall JB, Shankar GM, Shin JH. Commentary: Hybrid Therapy (Surgery and Radiosurgery) for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma Spinal Metastases. Neurosurgery 2022; 90:e35-e36. [PMID: 34995270 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elie Massaad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Development and internal validation of an RPA-based model predictive of pain flare incidence after spine SBRT. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e269-e277. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
40
|
Marta GN, de Arruda FF, Miranda FA, Silva ARNS, Neves-Junior WFP, Mancini A, Hanna SA, Abreu CECV, da Silva JLF, Nascimento JEV, Haddad CMK, Moraes FY, Gadia R. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for spinal metastases: experience at a single Brazilian institution. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2021; 26:756-763. [PMID: 34760310 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with spine metastases who underwent stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) as part of their treatment. SABR has arisen as a contemporary treatment option for spinal metastasis patients with good prognoses. Materials and methods Between November 2010 and September 2018, Spinal SABR was performed in patients with metastatic disease in different settings: radical (SABR only), postoperative (after decompression and/or fixation surgery), and reirradiation. Local control (LC), pain control, overall survival (OS) and toxicities were reported. Results Eighty-five patients (corresponding to 96 treatments) with spine metastases were included. The median age was 59 years (range, 23-91). In most SA BR (82.3%, n = 79) was performed as the first local spine treatment, while in 12 settings (12.5%), fixation and/or decompression surgery was performed prior to SABR. Two-year overall survival rate was 74.1%, and median survival was 19 months. The LC rate at 2 years was 72.3%. With regard to pain control, among 67 patients presenting with pain before SA BR, 83.3% had a complete response, 12.1% had a partial response, and 4.6% had progression. Vertebral compression fractures occurred in 10 patients (11.7%), of which 5 cases occurred in the reirradiation setting. Radiculopathy and myelopathy were not observed. No grade III or IV toxicities were seen. Conclusion This is the first study presenting a Brazilian experience with spinal SA BR, and the results confirm its feasibility and safety. SABR was shown to produce good local and pain control rates with low rates of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo N Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Fabiana A Miranda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alice R N S Silva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Anselmo Mancini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Samir A Hanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carlos E C V Abreu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Fabio Y Moraes
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Queen's University - Kingston Health Science Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Rafael Gadia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Shao H, Teng L, Dai J, Zhang W, Lin S, Zhao L, Zou H. Bone pain from spinal metastases: Iodine-125 brachytherapy. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021:bmjspcare-2021-003285. [PMID: 34732474 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of CT-guided iodine-125 (125I) brachytherapy in patients with spinal metastasis-induced pain who were not suitable to receive radiotherapy. METHODS A cohort of 68 patients with spinal metastasis induced pain not fully relieved by opioids and did not receive external beam radiation therapy due to poor general status were enrolled and underwent CT-guided 125I brachytherapy for analgesic treatment. RESULTS Patients were followed for 8 weeks after brachytherapy. Mean Numerical Rating Scale score before brachytherapy was 7.3±1.3 and decreased to 3.3±0.9, 2.6±0.8, 2.7±0.8, 2.9±0.9 and 3.3±1.1 at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8, respectively, after brachytherapy. Daily dose of morphine equivalent was 105.1±28.0 mg before brachytherapy and decreased to 45.3±13.7, 39.9±14.2, 40.4±14.9, 48.5±18.0 and 62.4±17.5 mg at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8, respectively, after brachytherapy. Patients had fewer daily episodes of breakthrough pain after brachytherapy (p<0.001). Patients had improvement in pain-related functional interference and in hospital anxiety and depression score after brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS CT-guided 125I brachytherapy is an effective and safe intervention for patients with spinal metastasis-induced pain who are not able to receive radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongxue Shao
- Pain Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Lei Teng
- Pain Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Junzhu Dai
- Pain Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Wenhui Zhang
- Pain Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Shiyan Lin
- Pain Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Liuyuan Zhao
- Pain Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Huichao Zou
- Pain Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nieblas-Bedolla E, Zuccato J, Kluger H, Zadeh G, Brastianos PK. Central Nervous System Metastases. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2021; 36:161-188. [PMID: 34711458 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The proportion of patients developing central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is increasing. Most are identified once symptomatic. Surgical resection is indicated for solitary or symptomatic brain metastases, separation surgery for compressive radioresistant spinal metastases, and instrumentation for unstable spinal lesions. Surgical biopsies are performed when histological diagnoses are required. Stereotactic radiosurgery is an option for limited small brain metastases and radioresistant spinal metastases. Whole-brain radiotherapy is reserved for extensive brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease with approaches to reduce cognitive side effects. Radiosensitive and inoperable spinal metastases typically receive external beam radiotherapy. Systemic therapy is increasingly being utilized for CNS metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin Nieblas-Bedolla
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jeffrey Zuccato
- MacFeeters-Hamilton Center for Neuro-Oncology Research, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 14-701, Toronto Medical Discovery Tower (TMDT), 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Harriet Kluger
- Section of Medical Oncology-WWW211, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- MacFeeters-Hamilton Center for Neuro-Oncology Research, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 14-701, Toronto Medical Discovery Tower (TMDT), 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada.
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gottumukkala S, Srivastava U, Brocklehurst S, Mendel JT, Kumar K, Yu FF, Agarwal A, Shah BR, Vira S, Raj KM. Fundamentals of Radiation Oncology for Treatment of Vertebral Metastases. Radiographics 2021; 41:2136-2156. [PMID: 34623944 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021210052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The fields of both radiology and radiation oncology have evolved considerably in the past few decades, resulting in an increased ability to delineate between tumor and normal tissue to precisely target and treat vertebral metastases with radiation therapy. These scientific advances have also led to improvements in assessing treatment response and diagnosing toxic effects related to radiation treatment. However, despite technological innovations yielding greatly improved rates of palliative relief and local control of osseous spinal metastases, radiation therapy can still lead to a number of acute and delayed posttreatment complications. Treatment-related adverse effects may include pain flare, esophageal toxic effects, dermatitis, vertebral compression fracture, radiation myelopathy, and myositis, among others. The authors provide an overview of the multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of spinal metastases, indications for surgical management versus radiation therapy, various radiation technologies and techniques (along with their applications for spinal metastases), and current principles of treatment planning for conventional and stereotactic radiation treatment. Different radiologic criteria for assessment of treatment response, recent advances in radiologic imaging, and both common and rare complications related to spinal irradiation are also discussed, along with the imaging characteristics of various adverse effects. Familiarity with these topics will not only assist the diagnostic radiologist in assessing treatment response and diagnosing treatment-related complications but will also allow more effective collaboration between diagnostic radiologists and radiation oncologists to guide management decisions and ensure high-quality patient care. ©RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujana Gottumukkala
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (S.G., S.B., K.K.), Department of Radiology (U.S., F.F.Y., A.A., B.R.S., K.M.R.), and Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery (S.V.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390; and Rio Grande Urology, El Paso, Tex (J.T.M.)
| | - Udayan Srivastava
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (S.G., S.B., K.K.), Department of Radiology (U.S., F.F.Y., A.A., B.R.S., K.M.R.), and Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery (S.V.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390; and Rio Grande Urology, El Paso, Tex (J.T.M.)
| | - Samantha Brocklehurst
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (S.G., S.B., K.K.), Department of Radiology (U.S., F.F.Y., A.A., B.R.S., K.M.R.), and Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery (S.V.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390; and Rio Grande Urology, El Paso, Tex (J.T.M.)
| | - J Travis Mendel
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (S.G., S.B., K.K.), Department of Radiology (U.S., F.F.Y., A.A., B.R.S., K.M.R.), and Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery (S.V.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390; and Rio Grande Urology, El Paso, Tex (J.T.M.)
| | - Kiran Kumar
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (S.G., S.B., K.K.), Department of Radiology (U.S., F.F.Y., A.A., B.R.S., K.M.R.), and Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery (S.V.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390; and Rio Grande Urology, El Paso, Tex (J.T.M.)
| | - Fang F Yu
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (S.G., S.B., K.K.), Department of Radiology (U.S., F.F.Y., A.A., B.R.S., K.M.R.), and Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery (S.V.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390; and Rio Grande Urology, El Paso, Tex (J.T.M.)
| | - Amit Agarwal
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (S.G., S.B., K.K.), Department of Radiology (U.S., F.F.Y., A.A., B.R.S., K.M.R.), and Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery (S.V.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390; and Rio Grande Urology, El Paso, Tex (J.T.M.)
| | - Bhavya R Shah
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (S.G., S.B., K.K.), Department of Radiology (U.S., F.F.Y., A.A., B.R.S., K.M.R.), and Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery (S.V.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390; and Rio Grande Urology, El Paso, Tex (J.T.M.)
| | - Shaleen Vira
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (S.G., S.B., K.K.), Department of Radiology (U.S., F.F.Y., A.A., B.R.S., K.M.R.), and Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery (S.V.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390; and Rio Grande Urology, El Paso, Tex (J.T.M.)
| | - Karuna M Raj
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (S.G., S.B., K.K.), Department of Radiology (U.S., F.F.Y., A.A., B.R.S., K.M.R.), and Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery (S.V.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390; and Rio Grande Urology, El Paso, Tex (J.T.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Furlan JC, Wilson JR, Massicotte EM, Sahgal A, Michael FG. Recent advances and new discoveries in the pipeline of the treatment of primary spinal tumors and spinal metastases: A scoping review. Neuro Oncol 2021; 24:1-13. [PMID: 34508647 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The field of spinal oncology has substantially evolved over the past decades. This review synthesizes and appraises what was learned and what will potentially be discovered from the recently completed and ongoing clinical studies related to the treatment of primary and secondary spinal neoplasms. This scoping review included all clinical studies on the treatment of spinal neoplasms registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov website from February/2000 to December/2020. The terms "spinal cord tumor", "spinal metastasis", and "metastatic spinal cord compression" were used. Of the 174 registered clinical studies on primary spinal tumors and spinal metastasis, most of the clinical studies registered in this American registry were interventional studies led by single institutions in North America (n=101), Europe (n=43), Asia (n=24) or other continents (n=6). The registered clinical studies mainly focused on treatment strategies for spinal neoplasms (90.2%) that included investigating stereotactic radiosurgery (n=33), radiotherapy (n=21), chemotherapy (n=20), and surgical technique (n=11). Of the 69 completed studies, the results from 44 studies were published in the literature. In conclusion, this review highlights the key features of the 174 clinical studies on spinal neoplasms that were registered from 2000 to 2020. Clinical trials were heavily skewed towards the metastatic population as opposed to the primary tumours which likely reflects the rarity of the latter condition and associated challenges in undertaking prospective clinical studies in this population. This review serves to emphasize the need for a focused approach to enhancing translational research in spinal neoplasms with a particular emphasis on primary tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio C Furlan
- Lyndhurst Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jefferson R Wilson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric M Massicotte
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fehlings G Michael
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pérez-Montero H, Godino O, Lozano A, Asiáin L, Martínez I, Sánchez JJ, de BlasFernández R, Fernández E, Stefanovic M, García N, Martínez J, Guedea F, Navarro-Martin A. Long-term outcomes of spinal SBRT. Is it important to select the treatment time? Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 24:276-287. [PMID: 34342817 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02684-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) is widely used as a curative treatment in tumoral lesions and has become a fundamental tool for the treatment of spine metastasis. In this study, we present survival and toxicity outcomes of spine SBRT after a 2-year follow-up. METHODS/PATIENTS Data from spine SBRT treatments performed at our institution between March 2012 and February 2020 was collected. Medical records, including demographic, primary tumor, and treatment characteristics were reviewed. Patient follow-up included clinical evaluation, imaging, and blood tests. Toxicity was recorded according to CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS We analyzed 73 consecutive spine SBRT treatments in 60 patients. 39.7% of the cases had primary breast cancer and 23.3% had prostate cancer. Most cases (87.7%) were treated with a single SBRT fraction of 16 Gy. Median follow-up was 26.1 months (range 1.7-78.6), and 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.9% and 84.2%, respectively. Local control (LC) rates at 1- and 2-years were 76.3% and 70.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified histology as a prognostic factor for both OS and LC. Patients who underwent spine SBRT 6 months after the spinal lesion diagnosis had LC at 2 years of 88%, vs 61.7% for those who underwent SBRT before this period. No grade III or higher toxicity was reported. The vertebral compression fracture (VCF) rate was 4.1%. CONCLUSION Spine SBRT at our institution showed a 2-year LC of 70.6%, without G3 toxicities. Delaying SBRT at least 6 months to administer systemic treatment was related to an improvement in local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Pérez-Montero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català D'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - O Godino
- Neurosurgery Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Lozano
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català D'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Asiáin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català D'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Martínez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català D'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J J Sánchez
- Radiodiagnostic Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R de BlasFernández
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Institut Català D'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Fernández
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Stefanovic
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català D'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - N García
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català D'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Martínez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català D'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Guedea
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català D'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Navarro-Martin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català D'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Blakaj DM, Palmer JD, Dibs K, Olausson A, Bourekas EC, Boulter D, Ayan AS, Cochran E, Marras WS, Mageswaran P, Katzir M, Yildiz VO, Grecula J, Arnett A, Raval R, Scharschmidt T, Elder JB, Lonser R, Chakravarti A, Mendel E. Postoperative Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastasis and Predictors of Local Control. Neurosurgery 2021; 88:1021-1027. [PMID: 33575784 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spine surgery is indicated for select patients with mechanical instability, pain, and/or malignant epidural spinal cord compression, with or without neurological compromise. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an option for durable local control (LC) for metastatic spine disease. OBJECTIVE To determine factors associated with LC and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients receiving postoperative stereotactic spine radiosurgery. METHODS We analyzed consecutive patients from 2013 to 2019 treated with surgical intervention followed by SBRT. Surgical interventions included laminectomy and vertebrectomy. SBRT included patients treated with 1 to 5 fractions of radiosurgery. We analyzed LC, PFS, overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 63 patients were treated with a median follow-up of 12.5 mo. Approximately 75% of patients underwent vertebrectomy and 25% underwent laminectomy. One-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 19%. LC was significantly improved for patients receiving radiosurgery ≤40 d from surgery compared to that for patients receiving radiosurgery ≥40 d from surgery, 94% vs 75%, respectively, at 1 yr (P = .03). Patients who received preoperative embolization had improved LC with 1-yr LC of 88% vs 76% for those who did not receive preoperative embolization (P = .037). Significant predictors for LC on multivariate analysis were time from surgery to radiosurgery, higher radiotherapy dose, and preoperative embolization. The 1-yr PFS and OS was 56% and 60%, respectively. CONCLUSION Postoperative radiosurgery has excellent and durable LC for spine metastasis. An important consideration when planning postoperative radiosurgery is minimizing delay from surgery to radiosurgery. Preoperative embolization and higher radiotherapy dose were associated with improved LC warranting further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dukagjin M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Khaled Dibs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Alexander Olausson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric C Bourekas
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Department of Radiology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Daniel Boulter
- Department of Radiology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ahmet S Ayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric Cochran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - William S Marras
- Spine Research Institute, College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Prasath Mageswaran
- Spine Research Institute, College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Miki Katzir
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Vedat O Yildiz
- Center for Biostatistics, College of Medicine Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - John Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Andrea Arnett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Raju Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Thomas Scharschmidt
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - James B Elder
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Russell Lonser
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ehud Mendel
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Guckenberger M, Mantel F, Sweeney RA, Hawkins M, Belderbos J, Ahmed M, Andratschke N, Madani I, Flentje M. Long-Term Results of Dose-Intensified Fractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Painful Spinal Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:348-357. [PMID: 33412262 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report long-term outcome of fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for painful spinal metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS This prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial enrolled 57 patients with 63 painful, unirradiated spinal metastases between March 2012 and July 2015. Patients were treated with 48.5 Gy in 10 SBRT fractions (long life expectancy [Mizumoto score ≤4]) or 35 Gy in 5 SBRT fractions (intermediate life expectancy [Mizumoto score 5-9]). Pain response was defined as pain improvement of a minimum of 2 points on a visual analog scale, and net pain relief was defined as the sum of time with pain response (complete and partial) divided by the overall follow-up time. RESULTS All 57 patients received treatment per protocol; 32 and 25 patients were treated with 10- and 5-fraction SBRT, respectively. The median follow-up of living patients was 60 months (range, 33-74 months). Of evaluable patients, 82% had complete or partial pain response (responders) at 3 months' follow-up (primary endpoint), and pain response remained stable over 5 years. Net pain relief was 74% (95% CI, 65%-80%). Overall survival rates of 1, 3, and 5 years were 59.6% (95% CI, 47%-72%), 33.3% (95% CI, 21%-46%), and 21% (95% CI, 10%-32%), respectively. Freedom from local spinal-metastasis progression was 82% at the last imaging follow-up. Late grade-3 toxicity was limited to pain in 2 patients (nonresponders). There were no cases of myelopathy. SBRT resulted in long-term improvements of all dimensions of the 5-level EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire except anxiety/depression. CONCLUSIONS Fractionated SBRT achieved durable pain response and improved quality of life at minimum late toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
| | - Frederick Mantel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Reinhart A Sweeney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Maria Hawkins
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - José Belderbos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Merina Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Indira Madani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Flentje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Perdomo-Pantoja A, Holmes C, Lina IA, Liauw JA, Puvanesarajah V, Goh BC, Achebe CC, Cottrill E, Elder BD, Grayson WL, Redmond KJ, Hur SC, Witham TF. Effects of Single-Dose Versus Hypofractionated Focused Radiation on Vertebral Body Structure and Biomechanical Integrity: Development of a Rabbit Radiation-Induced Vertebral Compression Fracture Model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:528-538. [PMID: 33989720 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Vertebral compression fracture is a common complication of spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy. Development of an in vivo model is crucial to fully understand how focal radiation treatment affects vertebral integrity and biology at various dose fractionation regimens. We present a clinically relevant animal model to analyze the effects of localized, high-dose radiation on vertebral microstructure and mechanical integrity. Using this model, we test the hypothesis that fractionation of radiation dosing can reduce focused radiation therapy's harmful effects on the spine. METHODS AND MATERIALS The L5 vertebra of New Zealand white rabbits was treated with either a 24-Gy single dose of focused radiation or 3 fractionated 8-Gy doses over 3 consecutive days via the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform. Nonirradiated rabbits were used as controls. Rabbits were euthanized 6 months after irradiation, and their lumbar vertebrae were harvested for radiologic, histologic, and biomechanical testing. RESULTS Localized single-dose radiation led to decreased vertebral bone volume and trabecular number and a subsequent increase in trabecular spacing and thickness at L5. Hypofractionation of the radiation dose similarly led to reduced trabecular number and increased trabecular spacing and thickness, yet it preserved normalized bone volume. Single-dose irradiated vertebrae displayed lower fracture loads and stiffness compared with those receiving hypofractionated irradiation and with controls. The hypofractionated and control groups exhibited similar fracture load and stiffness. For all vertebral samples, bone volume, trabecular number, and trabecular spacing were correlated with fracture loads and Young's modulus (P < .05). Hypocellularity was observed in the bone marrow of both irradiated groups, but osteogenic features were conserved in only the hypofractionated group. CONCLUSIONS Single-dose focal irradiation showed greater detrimental effects than hypofractionation on the microarchitectural, cellular, and biomechanical characteristics of irradiated vertebral bodies. Correlation between radiologic measurements and biomechanical properties supported the reliability of this animal model of radiation-induced vertebral compression fracture, a finding that can be applied to future studies of preventative measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christina Holmes
- Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Florida A&M University-Florida State University College of Engineering, Tallahassee, Florida
| | - Ioan A Lina
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jason A Liauw
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Varun Puvanesarajah
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Brian C Goh
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chukwuebuka C Achebe
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ethan Cottrill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Warren L Grayson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Soojung C Hur
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Timothy F Witham
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sharfo AWM, Rossi L, Dirkx MLP, Breedveld S, Aluwini S, Heijmen BJM. Complementing Prostate SBRT VMAT With a Two-Beam Non-Coplanar IMRT Class Solution to Enhance Rectum and Bladder Sparing With Minimum Increase in Treatment Time. Front Oncol 2021; 11:620978. [PMID: 33816253 PMCID: PMC8018286 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.620978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Enhance rectum and bladder sparing in prostate SBRT with minimum increase in treatment time by complementing dual-arc coplanar VMAT with a two-beam non-coplanar IMRT class solution (CS). Methods For twenty patients, an optimizer for automated multi-criterial planning with integrated beam angle optimization (BAO) was used to generate dual-arc VMAT plans, supplemented with five non-coplanar IMRT beams with individually optimized orientations (VMAT+5). In all plan generations, reduction of high rectum dose had the highest priority after obtaining adequate PTV coverage. A CS with two most preferred directions in VMAT+5 and largest rectum dose reductions compared to dual-arc VMAT was then selected to define VMAT+CS. VMAT+CS was compared with automatically generated i) dual-arc coplanar VMAT plans (VMAT), ii) VMAT+5 plans, and iii) IMRT plans with 30 patient-specific non-coplanar beam orientations (30-NCP). Plans were generated for a 4 x 9.5 Gy fractionation scheme. Differences in PTV doses, healthy tissue sparing, and computation and treatment delivery times were quantified. Results For equal PTV coverage, VMAT+CS, consisting of dual-arc VMAT supplemented with two fixed, non-coplanar IMRT beams with fixed Gantry/Couch angles of 65°/30° and 295°/-30°, significantly reduced OAR doses and the dose bath, compared to dual-arc VMAT. Mean relative differences in rectum Dmean, D1cc, V40GyEq and V60GyEq were 19.4 ± 10.6%, 4.2 ± 2.7%, 34.9 ± 20.3%, and 39.7 ± 23.2%, respectively (all p<0.001). There was no difference in bladder D1cc, while bladder Dmean reduced by 17.9 ± 11.0% (p<0.001). Also, the clinically evaluated urethra D5%, D10%, and D50% showed small, but statistically significant improvements. All patient VX with X = 2, 5, 10, 20, and 30 Gy were reduced with VMAT+CS, with a maximum relative reduction for V10Gy of 19.0 ± 7.3% (p<0.001). Total delivery times with VMAT+CS only increased by 1.9 ± 0.7 min compared to VMAT (9.1 ± 0.7 min). The dosimetric quality of VMAT+CS plans was equivalent to VMAT+5, while optimization times were reduced by a factor of 25 due to avoidance of individualized BAO. Compared to VMAT+CS, the 30-NCP plans were only favorable in terms of dose bath, at the cost of much enhanced optimization and delivery times. Conclusions The proposed two-beam non-coplanar class solution to complement coplanar dual-arc VMAT resulted in substantial plan quality improvements for OARs (especially rectum) and reduced irradiated patient volumes with minor increases in treatment delivery times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Wahab M Sharfo
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Linda Rossi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten L P Dirkx
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Ben J M Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Soltys SG, Grimm J, Milano MT, Xue J, Sahgal A, Yorke E, Yamada Y, Ding GX, Li XA, Lovelock DM, Jackson A, Ma L, El Naqa I, Gibbs IC, Marks LB, Benedict S. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases: Tumor Control Probability Analyses and Recommended Reporting Standards. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:112-123. [PMID: 33516580 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to investigate the tumor control probability (TCP) of spinal metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in 1 to 5 fractions. METHODS AND MATERIALS PubMed-indexed articles from 1995 to 2018 were eligible for data extraction if they contained SBRT dosimetric details correlated with actuarial 2-year local tumor control rates. Logistic dose-response models of collected data were compared in terms of physical dose and 3-fraction equivalent dose. RESULTS Data were extracted from 24 articles with 2619 spinal metastases. Physical dose TCP modeling of 2-year local tumor control from the single-fraction data were compared with data from 2 to 5 fractions, resulting in an estimated α/β = 6 Gy, and this was used to pool data. Acknowledging the uncertainty intrinsic to the data extraction and modeling process, the 90% TCP corresponded to 20 Gy in 1 fraction, 28 Gy in 2 fractions, 33 Gy in 3 fractions, and (with extrapolation) 40 Gy in 5 fractions. The estimated TCP for common fractionation schemes was 82% at 18 Gy, 90% for 20 Gy, and 96% for 24 Gy in a single fraction, 82% for 24 Gy in 2 fractions, and 78% for 27 Gy in 3 fractions. CONCLUSIONS Spinal SBRT with the most common fractionation schemes yields 2-year estimates of local control of 82% to 96%. Given the heterogeneity in the tumor control estimates extracted from the literature, with variability in reporting of dosimetry data and the definition of and statistical methods of reporting tumor control, care should be taken interpreting the resultant model-based estimates. Depending on the clinical intent, the improved TCP with higher dose regimens should be weighed against the potential risks for greater toxicity. We encourage future reports to provide full dosimetric data correlated with tumor local control to allow future efforts of modeling pooled data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
| | - Jimm Grimm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Jinyu Xue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - George X Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - X Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - D Michael Lovelock
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lijun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Machine Learning Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Iris C Gibbs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Lineberger Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stanley Benedict
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, California
| |
Collapse
|