Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Prostatectomy With Single-Dose Radiotherapy in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From the PROSINT Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Acute Toxicity and Early Prostate Specific Antigen Response After Two-Fraction Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer Using Peri-Rectal Spacing-Initial Report of the SABR-Dual Trial

PURPOSE

SABR-Dual is a phase-III trial with an initial phase-I safety cohort, of 2-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) with optional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based focal boost, using peri-rectal spacing, for localized prostate cancer. This represents the initial report from the phase-I non-randomized cohort.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Subjects had favorable intermediate risk (FIR) or low risk prostate adenocarcinoma, and gland volume <80 cc. All underwent radiopaque hydrogel spacer and fiducial marker placement before simulation (computed tomography and 3-tesla T2 MRI). The clinical target volume included the entire prostate, and in FIR patients, 1-2 cm of seminal vesicle. A 2-mm expansion was applied for planning target volume (PTV), and a dose of 27 Gy was prescribed to the PTV-prostate, 23 Gy to the PTV-seminal vesicle, with an optional 30 Gy simultaneous boost to an MRI-defined dominant lesion. Primary endpoint was 3-month patient-reported changes in quality of life based on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26, International Prostate Symptom Score, and Sexual Health Inventory for Men questionnaires. Secondary endpoints were 6-month quality of life, acute toxicity (using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) and early Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response.

RESULTS

Among the 20 patients in the phase-I cohort, 95% had FIR disease, and 50% received a simultaneous boost. At median follow-up of 8 months, a 3-month minimally clinically important change occurred in 1/20 (5%), 6/20 (30%), 2/20 (10%), 4/20 (20%), and 5/20 (25%) in urinary incontinence, urinary obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. There was a mean increase of 1 ± 5.4 in International Prostate Symptom Score and decrease of 1.8 ± 6.5 in Sexual Health Inventory for Men scores. Rates of grade 2 urinary and bowel toxicity were 10% and 0%, respectively, with no grade ≥3 toxicities. Mean PSA decrease at last follow-up was 70.4% ± 17.7%.

CONCLUSION

This generalizable protocol of 2-fraction prostate SABR using peri-rectal spacing is a safe approach for ultra-hypofractionated dose-escalation, with minimal acute toxicity. Longer-term outcomes and direct comparison with standard 5-fraction SABR are being studied in the phase-III randomized portion of SABR-Dual.

Ablative Radiation Therapy for Unfavorable Prostate Tumors (ABRUPT): Preliminary Analysis of Toxicity and Quality of Life from a Prospective Study

PURPOSE

To assess late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) side effects in patients with organ-confined unfavorable prostate cancer (PCa) treated with single-dose ablative radiation therapy (SDRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty patients enrolled in a single-arm prospective trial received 24 Gy SDRT to the whole prostate with urethra-sparing and organ motion control delivered on a Linac platform with a 10 MV flattening filter-free single partial arc. Androgen deprivation therapy was prescribed as per standard of care. Treatment-related acute and late GU and GI toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events_v5 scale) and quality of life (QoL) outcomes (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-PR25/C30, International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]) were assessed at different time points. Minimal important difference (MID) was established as a change of >0.5 pooled standard deviations from baseline. Statistical analysis included analysis of variance and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 18 months (range, 6-31 months), with no ≥G3 late side effects observed. G2 late GI and G2 late GU toxicities occurred in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. GI toxicity of any grade correlated with maximum rectal dose (P = .021). Lower baseline QoL score (P = .025), higher baseline IPSS score (P = .049), acute GU toxicity (P = .029), and acute urinary domain MID (P = .045) predicted GU toxicity of any grade. In multivariate analysis (MVA), only baseline QoL score (odds ratio [OR], 0.95, P = .031) and acute GU toxicity (OR, 8.4, P = .041) remained significant. Significant QoL change was observed only in the urinary domain (P = .005), with a median increase from 8 to 17. Late urinary MID correlated with acute urinary MID (P = .003), acute QoL MID (P = .029), acute GU toxicity (P = .030), and lower baseline urinary score (P = .033). In MVA, only acute urinary MID predicted late urinary MID (OR, 9.7, P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide promising data on the feasibility and safety of 24 Gy whole-gland SDRT with urethra-sparing and organ motion control, in association with androgen deprivation therapy and an adequate prophylactic medication, in organ-confined unfavorable PCa. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these results.

Proton Versus CyberKnife Therapy Planning for Hypofractionated Treatment of Prostate With Focal Boost

Purpose

To compare intensity-modulated proton therapy with CyberKnife (CK) therapy for hypo-fractionated treatments of prostate with focal boost, as a first planning study for prostate with dose escalation to a dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL).

Materials and Methods

Ten patients who possess one DIL in their prostate and their CK plans that were used to treat the planning target volume of prostate were chosen. Six of the plans were further escalated to DIL. Intensity-modulated proton therapy plans were created for the patients with robust optimization, accounting for setup and range uncertainties for the clinical target volume (CTV) of prostate. The CK plans were then compared with the proton plans.

Results

In the worst scenario of the robust evaluation, the proton plans reasonably met all objectives and constraints used in CK planning for both CTV coverage and organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing. Under the nominal scenario of the robust optimization, the proton plans produced dosimetric values comparable to those by the CK plans for both CTV and DIL coverage. The average dose to CTV, outside DIL and urethra, was found lower in the proton plans than in the CK plans due to the uncertainties. A similar trend was observed for the dose conformity to CTV. These two findings, however, were not planning objectives. Regarding organs-at-risk sparing, the proton plans in the nominal scenario were comparable to the CK plans for doses >18.125 Gy; for doses below it, the proton performed better. This study offers a basis for a clinical trial of treatment of prostate cancer by proton that may be transferred from the CK system in our center.

Conclusion

The dosimetric objectives and constraints used in the CK plans were achieved with the proton plans.

Urinary Organs at Risk for Prostate Cancer External Beam Radiation Therapy: Contouring Guidelines on Behalf of the Francophone Group of Urological Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

The occurrence of genitourinary (GU) toxicity is a common adverse event observed after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer (PCa). Recent findings suggest that the dose delivered to specific urinary organs at risk (OARs) such as the ureters, bladder trigone, and urethra is involved in the development of GU toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A multidisciplinary task force including 3 radiation oncologists, a uroradiologist, and a urologist was created in 2022. First, OARs potentially involved in GU toxicity were identified and discussed. A literature review was performed, addressing several questions relative to urinary OARs: anatomic and radiological definition, radiation-induced injury, and dose-volume parameters. Second, results were presented and discussed with a panel of radiation oncologists and members of the "Francophone Group of Urological Radiation Therapy." Thereafter, the "Francophone Group of Urological Radiation Therapy" experts were asked to answer a dedicated questionnaire, including 35 questions on the controversial issues related to the delineation of urinary OARs.

RESULTS

The following structures were identified as critical for PCa EBRT: ureters, bladder, bladder neck, bladder trigone, urethra (intraprostatic, membranous, and spongious), striated sphincter, and postenucleation or posttransurethral resection of the prostate cavity. A consensus was obtained for 32 out of 35 items.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus highlights contemporary urinary structures in both the upper and lower urinary tract to be considered for EBRT treatment planning of PCa. The current recommendations also propose a standardized definition of urinary OARs for both daily practice and future clinical trials.

Four Cases of Single-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer has been reported to date. Here, we report on four patients with prostate cancer who were treated with single-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy. It was conducted with reference to some previous clinical trials. The median age of the patients was 76.5 years (range: 72-89 years). All except one patient with low-risk prostate cancer received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) before irradiation. All patients received a dose of 24 Gy in one fraction using X-ray photon beams when prostate-specific antigen (PSA) fell to low levels due to ADT. After irradiation, all patients had a gradual decline in PSA, and so far none has had a PSA recurrence. Although Grade 1-2 adverse events occurred in all cases, none of the patients showed adverse events of Grade 3 or over during the observation period.

ONE SHOT - single shot radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: 18-month results of a single arm, multicenter phase I/II trial

PURPOSE

To assess in a prospective, multicenter, single-arm phase I/II study the early safety and efficacy profile of single fraction urethra-sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for men with localized prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer without significant tumor in the transitional zone were recruited. A single-fraction of 19 Gy was delivered to the prostate, with 17 Gy dose-reduction to the urethra. Intrafraction motion was monitored using intraprostatic electromagnetic transponders with intra-fraction correction of displacements exceeding 3 mm. Genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual toxicity during the first 18 months were evaluated using the CTCAE v4.0 grading scale. Quality of life was assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score, the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index composite 26 score, and the International Index of Erectile Function score.

RESULTS

Among the 45 patients recruited in 5 centers between 2017 and 2022, 43 received the single fraction without protocol deviations, and 34 had a minimal follow-up of 18 months. The worst GU toxicity was observed at day-5 after SBRT (42.5 % and 20 % with grade 1 and 2, respectively), returning to baseline at week-12 and month-6 (<3% with grade 2), with a 12 % grade 2 flare at month 18. Gl toxicity was mild in the acute phase, with no grade ≥ 2 events (12 % grade 1 at month 6). Grade-3 proctitis was observed in one patient at month 12, with < 3 % grade 2 toxicity at month 18. Mean GU and GI bother scores showed a decline at day 5, a complete recovery at month 6, and a flare between month 12 and 18. Mean PSA dropped from 6.2 ng/ml to 1.2 ng/ml at month 18 and 0.7 ng/ml at month 24. After a median follow-up time of 26 months, 3 biochemical failures (7 %) were observed at month 17, 21 and 30.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter phase I/II trial, we demonstrated that a 19 Gy single-fraction urethra-sparing SBRT is feasible and associated with an acceptable toxicity rate, mostly returning to the baseline at week-12 and with a symptoms flare between months 12 and 18. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the potential long-term adverse effects and the disease control efficacy.

SABR-Dual: a phase II/III trial of two-fraction versus five-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy for localized low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Dose-escalated radiotherapy is known to improve progression free survival in patients with localized prostate cancer, and recent advances have led to the standardization of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) delivered in just 5-fractions. Based on the known effectiveness of the accepted though invasive 2-fraction treatment method of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and given the ubiquity of prostate cancer, a further reduction in the number of treatments of external-beam SABR is possible. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and non-inferiority of generalizable 2-fraction SABR compared to the current 5-fraction regimen.

METHODS

502 patients will be enrolled on this phase II/III randomized control trial. Eligible patients will have previously untreated low- or favorable intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Patients will be randomized between standard SABR of 40 Gy in 5 fractions given every-other-day and 27 Gy in 2 fractions at least two days apart but completing within seven days. MRI-based planning, radiopaque hydrogel spacer insertion, and fiducial marker placement are required, and SABR will be delivered on either a standard CT-guided linear accelerator or MR-LINAC. The primary endpoint will be freedom from disease progression, with additional secondary clinical, toxicity, and quality of life endpoints.

DISCUSSION

This study will be the largest prospective randomized trial, adequately powered to demonstrate non-inferiority, comparing 2-fraction SABR to standard 5-fraction SABR for localized prostate cancer. As the protocol does not obligate use of an MRI-LINAC or other adaptive technologies, results will be broadly generalizable to the wider community.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06027892.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Radiosurgery Society Guide to the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer Illustrated by Challenging Cases

Traditionally, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) involved lengthy courses with low daily doses. However, advancements in radiation delivery and a better understanding of prostate radiobiology have enabled the development of shorter courses of EBRT. Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy, administering doses greater than 5 Gy per fraction, is now considered a standard of care regimen for localized PCa, particularly for intermediate-risk disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), a specific type of ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy employing advanced planning, imaging, and treatment technology to deliver in five or fewer fractions, is gaining prominence as a cost-effective, convenient, and safe alternative to longer radiotherapy courses. It is crucial to address practical considerations related to patient selection, fractionation scheme, target delineation, and planning objectives. This is especially important in challenging clinical situations where clear evidence for guidance may be lacking. The Radiosurgery Society endorses this case-based guide with the aim of providing a practical framework for delivering SBRT to the intact prostate, exemplified by two case studies. The article will explore common SBRT dose/fractionation schemes and dose constraints for organs-at-risk. Additionally, it will review existing evidence and expert opinions on topics such as SBRT dose escalation, the use of rectal spacers, the role of androgen deprivation therapy in the context of SBRT, SBRT in special patient populations (e.g., high-risk disease, large prostate, high baseline urinary symptom burdens, and inflammatory bowel disease), as well as new imaging-guidance techniques like Magnetic Resonance Imaging for SBRT delivery.

MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy-An Emerging and Disruptive Process of Care: Healthcare Economic and Policy Considerations

MRI-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) is an emerging, innovative technology that provides opportunities to transform and improve the current clinical care process in radiation oncology. As with many new technologies in radiation oncology, careful evaluation from a healthcare economic and policy perspective is required for its successful implementation. In this review article, we describe the current evidence surrounding MRgRT, framing it within the context of value within the healthcare system. Additionally, we highlight areas in which MRgRT may disrupt the current process of care, and discuss the evidence thresholds and timeline required for the widespread adoption of this promising technology.

Five Fractions versus Seven Fractions SBRT for Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Pair Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare two stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regimens in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer with regards toxicity and efficacy.

METHODS/MATERIAL

We retrospectively collected data from 198 patients treated with SBRT for prostate cancer at two different institutions. Patients received either 35-36.25 Gy in five fractions (group A) using Cyberknife robotic platform or 42.7 Gy in seven fractions (group B) using a C-arm LINAC (image-guided). Propensity score matching was done (2:1 nearest neighbor matching without replacement), resulting in 120 patients (80 patients for group A, 40 patients for group B). Toxicity, PSA nadir, biochemical failure and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median follow up of all patients was 13 months (range 1-91 months). Overall, 23.3% of patients had ≥G2 acute GU toxicity (21.1% group A versus 30% group B (p = 0.222)) and 6.6% of patients ≥G2 GI toxicity (2.5% versus 15% (p = 0.010)). There was one acute G3 GU toxicity in arm A and one acute G4 rectal bleeding in group B (anticoagulated patient). Regarding late toxicity, 14.1% of patients had ≥G2 late GU toxicity (17.4% versus 6.6% (p = 0.159)) and 5.0% of patients had ≥G2 late GI toxicity (1.4% versus 13.3% (p = 0.013)). There was one G3 late GU toxicity in arm B and two G3 late GI toxicities, one in each arm. Relative median PSA reduction was 92.4% (-53.9-99.9%) from baseline PSA (93.7% (-53.9-99.9%) in group A versus 87.7% (39.8-99.9%) in group B (p = 0.043). In total, 4.2% of patients had biochemical relapse, 5.0% in group A and 2.5% in group B (p = 0.518). One-year DFS in the overall cohort was 97.3%, 98.8% in group A and 94.3% in group B (p = 0.318).

CONCLUSION

Both SBRT regimens have acceptable acute and late toxicity and good efficacy. There are significantly more GI toxicities in the seven-fraction regimen. Longer follow-up is warranted for better comparison of long-term efficacy.

The march toward single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer-Quo Vadimus?

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for localized prostate cancer. There is increasing interest to reduce the number of fractions for prostate SBRT.

METHODS

We provide a narrative review and summary of prospective trials of different fractionation schedules for prostate SBRT, focusing on efficacy, toxicities, and quality of life outcomes.

RESULTS

There are two randomized phase 3 trials comparing standard external beam radiotherapy with ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy. HYPO-RT-PC compared 78 Gy in 39 fractions vs 42.7 Gy in 7 fractions (3D-CRT or IMRT) showing non-inferiority in 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival and equivalent tolerability. PACE-B trial compared 78 Gy in 39-fraction or 62 Gy in 20-fraction vs 36.25 Gy in 5-fraction prostate SBRT, with no significant differences in toxicity outcomes at 2 years. Five-year efficacy data for PACE-B are expected in 2024. Five-fraction prostate SBRT is currently the most common and well-established fractionation schedule with multiple prospective phase 2 trials published to date. There is more limited data on 1-4 fraction prostate SBRT. All fractionation schedules had acceptable toxicity outcomes. Experience from a high-dose-rate brachytherapy randomized trial showed inferior efficacy with single-fraction compared to two-fraction brachytherapy. Hence, caution should be applied in adopting single-fraction prostate SBRT.

CONCLUSION

Two-fraction SBRT is likely the shortest fractionation schedule that maintains the therapeutic ratio. Several randomized trials currently recruiting will likely provide us with more definite answers about whether two-fraction prostate SBRT should become a standard-of-care option. Enrollment of eligible patients into these trials should be encouraged.

Single-Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Primary and Extracranial Oligometastatic Cancers

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) consists of delivering high doses of ionising radiation, typically across three to eight fractions with high precision and conformity. SABR has become increasingly commonplace throughout the last quarter of a century and is offered for the treatment of various primary and metastatic tumour types. Delivering SABR in a single fraction has arisen as an appealing possibility for several reasons. These include fewer hospital visits, greater patient convenience, improved sustainability and lower costs. However, these factors must be balanced against considerations such as toxicity, side-effects and, most importantly, progression-free and overall survival. In this review we seek to analyse the results of studies looking at the efficacy of single-fraction SABR for lung, prostate, renal and pancreas primary tumours, as well as oligometastases. The tumour type to be most widely treated with single-fraction SABR is lung, but its remit continues to expand. We also look at the biological rationale underpinning SABR and how this can be extended to single-fraction regimens. Finally, we turn our attention towards the future directions of SABR and specifically single-fraction regimens. These include the possibility of combining SABR with immunotherapy and technological advances in the field, which could serve to expand the scope of SABR. We conclude by summarising the current clinical studies of single-fraction SABR.

Dosimetric correlates of toxicities and quality of life following two-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

There is no evidence-based data to guide dose constraints in two-fraction prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Using individual patient-data from two prospective trials, we aimed to correlate dosimetric parameters with toxicities and quality of life (QoL) outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 60 patients who had two-fraction prostate SABR in the 2STAR (NCT02031328) and 2SMART (NCT03588819) trials. The prescribed dose was 26 Gy to the prostate+/-32 Gy boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesions. Toxicities and QoL data were prospectively collected using CTCAEv4 and EPIC-26 questionnaire. The outcomes evaluated were acute and late grade ≥ 2 toxicities, and late minimal clinical important changes (MCIC) in QoL domains. Dosimetric parameters for bladder, urethra, rectum, and penile bulb were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 56 months (range: 39-78 months). The cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual toxicities were 62%, 3%, and 17% respectively in the acute setting (<3 months), and 57%, 15%, and 52% respectively in late setting (>6 months). There were 36%, 28%, and 29% patients who had late MCIC in urinary, bowel and sexual QoL outcomes respectively. Bladder 0.5 cc was significant predictor for late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities, with optimal cut-off of 25.5 Gy. Penile bulb D5cc was associated of late grade ≥ 2 sexual toxicities (no optimal cut-off was identified). No dosimetric parameters were identified to be associated with other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Using real-life patient data from prospective trials with medium-term follow-up, we identified additional dose constraints that may mitigate the risk of late treatment-related toxicities for two-fraction prostate SABR.

State of the art and future challenges of urethra-sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review of literature

PURPOSE

Doses delivered to the urethra have been associated with an increased risk to develop long-term urinary toxicity in patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer (PCa). Aim of the present systematic review is to report on the role of urethra-sparing SBRT (US-SBRT) techniques for prostate cancer, with a focus on outcome and urinary toxicity.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was performed on the PubMed database on May 2023. Based on the urethra-sparing technique, 13 studies were selected for the analysis and classified in the two following categories: "urethra-steering" SBRT (restriction of hotspots to the urethra) and "urethra dose-reduction" SBRT (dose reduction to urethra below the prescribed dose).

RESULTS

By limiting the urethra Dmax to 90GyEQD2 (α/β = 3 Gy) with urethra-steering SBRT techniques, late genitourinary (GU) grade 2 toxicity remains mild, ranging between 12.1% and 14%. With dose-reduction strategies decreasing the urethral dose below 70 GyEQD2, the risk of late GU toxicity was further reduced (< 8% at 5 years), while maintaining biochemical relapse-free survival rates up to 93% at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

US-SBRT techniques limiting maximum doses to urethra below a 90GyEQD2 (α/β = 3 Gy) threshold result in a low rate of acute and late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity. A better understanding of clinical factors and anatomical substructures involved in the development of GU toxicity, as well as the development and use of adapted dose constraints, is expected to further reduce the long-term GU toxicity of prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT.

Stressed target cancer cells drive nongenetic reprogramming of CAR T cells and solid tumor microenvironment

The poor efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T) for solid tumors is due to insufficient CAR T cell tumor infiltration, in vivo expansion, persistence, and effector function, as well as exhaustion, intrinsic target antigen heterogeneity or antigen loss of target cancer cells, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Here we describe a broadly applicable nongenetic approach that simultaneously addresses the multiple challenges of CAR T as a therapy for solid tumors. The approach reprograms CAR T cells by exposing them to stressed target cancer cells which have been exposed to the cell stress inducer disulfiram (DSF) and copper (Cu)(DSF/Cu) plus ionizing irradiation (IR). The reprogrammed CAR T cells acquire early memory-like characteristics, potent cytotoxicity, enhanced in vivo expansion, persistence, and decreased exhaustion. Tumors stressed by DSF/Cu and IR also reprogram and reverse the immunosuppressive TME in humanized mice. The reprogrammed CAR T cells, derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy donors or metastatic female breast cancer patients, induce robust, sustained memory and curative anti-solid tumor responses in multiple xenograft mouse models, establishing proof of concept for empowering CAR T by stressing tumor as a promising therapy for solid tumors.

Comparison of treatment costs for primary localized prostate cancer in Austria and Vienna: an economic analysis

Background

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Several efficient treatments are available for primary prostate cancer, but an economic comparison of these modalities has not been done in Austria.

Objective and setting

The current study provides an economic comparison of radiotherapy and surgery for prostate cancer in Vienna and Austria.

Methods

We analyzed the catalog of medical services of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection and present the treatment costs for the public health sector with an LKF-point value and monetary value in 2022.

Results

External beam radiotherapy, especially ultrahypofractionated, is the least costly treatment modality for low-risk prostate cancer, with costs of 2,492 € per treatment. For intermediate-risk prostate cancer, differences between moderate hypofractionation and brachytherapy are small, with costs of 4,638-5,140 €. In a high-risk setting, differences between radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy are small (7,087 € vs. 7474.06 €).

Conclusion

From a purely financial point of view, treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer in Vienna and Austria should consist of radiotherapy as long as the current catalog of services is up to date. For high-risk prostate cancer, no major difference was found.

Novel unconventional radiotherapy techniques: Current status and future perspectives - Report from the 2nd international radiation oncology online seminar

•Improvement of therapeutic ratio by novel unconventional radiotherapy approaches.•Immunomodulation using high-dose spatially fractionated radiotherapy.•Boosting radiation anti-tumor effects by adding an immune-mediated cell killing.

Safety and efficacy associated with single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy (SFHDR) for localized prostate cancer has been tried in clinical trials, relevant medical evidence is currently lacking. It is necessary to systematically analyze the safety and efficacy of SFHDR.

METHODS

Comprehensive and systematic searches for eligible studies were performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The primary endpoints included safety and efficacy, represented by toxic effects and biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), respectively. The proportion rates were used as the effect measure for each study and were presented with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and related 95% prediction interval (PI). Restricted maximum-likelihood estimator (REML) and the Hartung-Knapp method were used in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis, including 1440 patients. The median age of patients was 66.9 years old (62-73 years old) and the median follow-up was 47.5 months (12-75 months). The estimates of cumulative occurrence for severe gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxic effects were 0.1% (95% CI 0-0.2%) and 0.4% (95% CI 0-1.2%), and for grade 2 toxic effects were 1.6% (95% CI 0.1-4.7%) and 17.1% (95% CI 5.4-33.5%), respectively. The estimate of 3‑year bRFS was 87.5% (95% CI 84.4-90.3%) and 71.0% (95% CI 63.0-78.3%) for 5‑year bRFS. The pooled bRFS rates for low-risk patients were 99.0% (95% CI 85.2-100.0%) at 3 years and 80.9% (95% CI 75.4-85.9%) at 5 years, and the risk group was found to be statistically correlated with bRFS (3-year bRFS, P < 0.01; 5‑year bRFS, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

SFHDR is associated with favorable tolerability and suboptimal clinical benefit in patients with localized prostate cancer. Ongoing and planned high-quality prospective studies are necessary to verify its safety and efficacy.

Two-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with simultaneous boost to MRI-defined dominant intra-prostatic lesion - Results from the 2SMART phase 2 trial

PURPOSE

This is the first report of the 2SMART Phase II trial evaluating the safety of two-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with focal boost to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) defined dominant intra-prostatic lesion (DIL) for localised prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men with low or intermediate risk prostate cancer were eligible for the study. The gross tumour volume (GTV) was MRI-defined DIL, and the clinical target volume (CTV) was entire prostate gland. The planning target volume (PTV) was a 2 mm expansion anteroposterior and lateral, and 2.5 mm superoinferior. The prescribed dose was 32 Gy to GTV, and 26 Gy to CTV. Primary endpoint was minimal clinically important change (MCIC) in quality of life (QOL) within 3-months of SABR, assessed using the EPIC-26 questionnaire. Secondary endpoints were acute and late toxicities (assessed using CTCAEv4), PSA nadir, and biochemical failure (based on Phoenix criteria).

RESULTS

Thirty men were enrolled in the study - 2 (7%) had low-risk and 28 (93%) had intermediate risk prostate cancer. The median follow-up was 44 months (range:39-49 months). The median PSA nadir was 0.25 ng/mL, with median time to nadir of 37 months. One patient (3%) had biochemical failure at 44 months post-treatment. Ten (33%), six (20%), and three (10%) men had acute MCIC in urinary, bowel, and sexual QOL domains respectively. No acute or late grade ≥ 3 urinary or bowel toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSION

This novel protocol of two-fraction prostate SABR with MRI-defined DIL boost is a safe approach for dose-escalation, with minimal impact on acute QOL and no grade ≥ 3 toxicities.

Is single fraction the future of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)? A critical appraisal of the current literature

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a standard of care for many localizations but the question of the optimal fractionation remains a matter of concern. If single fraction sessions are routinely used for intracranial targets, their utilization for mobile extracranial lesions is a source of debate and apprehension. Single session treatments improve patient comfort, provide a medico-economic benefit, and have proven useful in the context of the SARS-CoV 2 pandemic. However, both technical and radiobiological uncertainties remain. Experience from intracranial radiosurgery has shown that the size of the target, its proximity to organs at risk, tumor histology, and the volume of normal tissue irradiated are all determining factors in the choice of fractionation. The literature on the use of single fraction for extracranial sites is still scarce. Only primary and secondary pulmonary tumors have been evaluated in prospective randomized trials, allowing the integration of these fractionation schemes in daily practice, for highly selected cases and in trained teams. The level of evidence for the other organs is mainly based on dose escalation or retrospective trials and calls for caution, with further studies being needed before routine use in clinical practice.

Single-fraction prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography- and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer local recurrences

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the efficacy and safety of focal prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET)- and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) local recurrences.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with PSMA-PET-positive PCa local recurrences treated with single-fraction SBRT between 2016 and 2020 were included. Identification for subsequent recurrences or metastatic spread based on increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were evaluated using PSMA-PET imaging.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were identified. Patients received various treatments before SBRT (31 patients with radical prostatectomy [RP], 18 external beam radiotherapy [EBRT] with RP, five EBRT, and the remaining 10 other combinations). The median follow-up was 21.6 months. The median PSA level before SBRT was 1.47 ng/mL. All patients received a single-fraction treatment with a median prescription dose and isodose line of 21 Gy and 65%, respectively. At the time of SBRT, six patients (9%) received an androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). PSA levels decreased after SBRT (P = 0.03) and three local recurrences were detected during the follow-up. The progression-free survival after 1-, 2-, and 3-years was 85.3%, 65.9%, and 51.2%, respectively. Six patients (9%) started ADT after SBRT due to disease progression. The rates of newly started ADT after 1-, 2-, and 3-years were 1.8%, 7.3%, and 22.7%, respectively. Grade 1 or 2 toxicities occurred in six patients (9%); no high-grade toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION

While the available data for SBRT in the PCa local recurrence setting describe outcomes for fractionated irradiations, the findings of this first analysis of single-fraction, PSMA-PET- and mpMRI-guided focal SBRT are encouraging. Such treatment appears to be a safe, efficient, and time-saving therapy even in intensively pretreated patients. Recurrence-directed treatments can delay the use of ADT and could avoid prostate bed irradiation in selected patients.

Reducing PTV margins for prostate SBRT with motion compensation and gating techniques

The purpose of this study is to investigate the dosimetric accuracy of prostate SBRT when motion is considered. To account for target movement, motion compensation and gating techniques were investigated with PTV margins reduced to 2 mm. To allow for dosimetric measurements a Delta4 phantom, Gafchromic film, and Hexamotion motion platform were utilized. Four motion files were utilized that represent a range of motions. Analysis of measured prostate motions for fifteen patients was performed to ensure detected motions were similar to those previously reported and motion files utilized were suitable. Five patient plans were utilized to allow for the effects of MLC and target motion interplay to be investigated. For both motion compensation and gating techniques, plans were delivered to the stationary phantom and for each of four motion types with/without compensation/gating enabled. Using a 3%, 2 mm and 80% threshold gamma criteria, film measurements had an average pass rate of 80.5% for uncorrected deliveries versus 96.0% for motion compensated deliveries. For gated techniques average pass rates increased from 89.9% for uncorrected to 94.8% with gating enabled. Measurements with the Delta4 arrays were analyzed with a 3%, 2 mm and 10% threshold dose. An average pass rate of 83.8% was measured for uncorrected motions versus 94.8% with motion compensation. For the gated technique an average pass rate of 87.2% was found for uncorrected motions versus 96.9% with gating enabled. These results show that very high gamma pass rates are achievable when motion compensation or gating techniques are applied. When target motion is not accounted for shifts up to 5 mm in planned versus delivered isodose distributions were found. However, when motion compensation, or gated techniques were applied, much smaller differences between planned and delivered isodose distributions were found. With these techniques dose delivery accuracy is greatly improved, allowing for PTV margins to be reduced.

Single fraction of HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Results of the SiFEPI phase II prospective trial

•

LDR brachytherapy is a validated therapy for low-risk prostate cancer.

•

HDR brachytherapy aims to decrease urinary side effects.

•

A single fraction of 20 Gy HDR brachytherapy leads to sub-optimal biochemical control.

•

No Grade 3 urinary/digestive toxicity after a single fraction of HDR brachytherapy.

•

2 fractions of HDR brachytherapy constitute a promising approach.

Purpose

To report the results of the Single Fraction Early Prostate Irradiation (SiFEPI) phase 2 prospective trial.

Materials/Methods

The SiFEPI trial (NCT02104362) evaluated a single fraction of high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDB) for low- (LR) and favorable-intermediate (FIR) risk prostate cancers. After rectal spacer placement, a single fraction of 20 Gy was delivered to the prostate. Oncological outcome (biochemical (bRFS) and local (lRFS) relapses, disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survivals and toxicity (acute/late genito-urinary (GU), gastro-intestinal (GI) and sexual (S) toxicities were investigated.

Results

From 03/2014 to 10/2017, 35 pts were enrolled, of whom 33 were evaluable. With a median age of 66 y [46–79], 25 (76 %) and 8 (24 %) pts were LR and FIR respectively. With a MFU of 72.8 months [64–86], 6y-bRFS, lRFS and mRFS were 62 % [45–85], 61 % [44–85] and 93 % [85–100] respectively while 6y-DFS, CSS and OS were 54 % [37–77], 100 % and 89 % [77–100] respectively. Late GU, GI and S toxicities were observed in 11 pts (33 %;18G1), 4 pts (12 %;4G1) and 7 pts (21 %;1G1,5G2,1G3) respectively. Biochemical relapse (BR) was observed in 11 pts (33 %;7LR,4FIR) with a median time interval between HDB and BR of 51 months [24–69]. Nine of these pts (82 %) presented a histologically proven isolated local recurrence.

Conclusions

Long-term results of the SiFEPI trial show that a single fraction of 20 Gy leads to sub-optimal biochemical control for LR/FIR prostate cancers. The late GU and GI toxicity profile is encouraging, leading to consideration of HDB as a safe irradiation technique.

Health-related quality of life of salvage prostate reirradiation using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with urethral-sparing

PURPOSE

To explore whether prostate motion mitigation using the rectal distension-mediated technique is safe and effective in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) salvage treatment of intraprostatic cancer recurrences following initial radiotherapy for primary prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 2013 and December 2020, 30 patients received salvage SABR for ⁶⁸Ga- PSMA-11 PET/CT-detected intra-prostatic relapses. Median time from primary RT to salvage reirradiation was 70.2 (IQR, 51.3-116.0) months. Median PSA at retreatment was 3.6 ng/mL (IQR, 1.9-6.2). Rectal distension-mediated SABR was achieved with a 150-cm³ air-inflated endorectal balloon and a Foley catheter loaded with 3 beacon transponders was used for urethra visualization and on-line tracking. MRI-based planning employed a 2-mm expansion around the planned target volume (PTV), reduced to 0-mm at the interface with critical organs at risk (OARs). Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) permitted a 20% dose reduction of the urethra. VMAT simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of the dominant intraprostatic lesion was deployed when indicated. Median SABR dose was 35 Gy (7 Gy per fraction over 5 consecutive days; range 35-40 Gy). Toxicity assessment used CTCAE v.4 criteria.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 44 months (IQR, 18-60). The actuarial 3- and 4-year biochemical relapse free survival was 53.4% and 47.5%, respectively. Intraprostatic post-salvage relapse by PSMA PET/CT was 53.3%. Acute grade 2 and 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicities were 20% and 0%, respectively. There were no instances of acute grade ≥2 rectal (GI) toxicity. Late grade 2 and 3 GU toxicities occurred in 13.3% and 0% of patients, respectively. There were no instances of grade ≥2 late rectal toxicity. Patient-reported QOL measures showed an acute transient deterioration in the urinary domain 1 month after treatment but returned to baseline values at 3 months. The median IPSS scores rose over baseline (≥5 points in 53% of patients) between month 6 and 12 post-treatment as a result of urinary symptoms flare, eventually receding at 18 months. The bowel domain metrics had no appreciable changes over time.

CONCLUSION

Pursuit of local control in intraprostatic failures is feasible and can be achieved with an acceptably low toxicity profile associated with effective OAR sparing.

Acid Sphingomyelinase-Ceramide Induced Vascular Injury Determines Colorectal Cancer Stem Cell Fate

BACKGROUND/AIMS

It is unknown whether cancer stem cells respond differentially to treatment compared with progeny, potentially providing therapeutic vulnerabilities. Our program pioneered use of ultra-high single dose radiotherapy, which cures diverse metastatic diseases at a higher rate (90-95%) than conventional fractionation (~65%). Single dose radiotherapy engages a distinct biology involving microvascular acid sphingomyelinase/ceramide signaling, which, via NADPH oxidase-2-dependent perfusion defects, initiates an adaptive tumor SUMO Stress Response that globally-inactivates homologous recombination repair of double stand breaks, conferring cure. Accumulating data show diverse stem cells display heightened-dependence on homologous recombination repair to repair resolve double stand breaks.

METHODS

Here we use colorectal cancer patient-derived xenografts containing logarithmically-increased Lgr5+ stem cells to explore whether optimizing engagement of this acid sphingomyelinase dependent biology enhances stem cell dependent tumor cure.

RESULTS

We show radioresistant colorectal cancer patient-derived xenograft CLR27-2 contains radioresistant microvasculature and stem cells, whereas radiosensitive colorectal cancer patient-derived xenograft CLR1-1 contains radiosensitive microvasculature and stem cells. Pharmacologic or gene therapy enhancement of single dose radiotherapy-induced acid sphingomyelinase/ceramide-mediated microvascular dysfunction dramatically sensitizes CLR27-2 homologous recombination repair inactivation, converting Lgr5+ cells from the most resistant to most sensitive patient-derived xenograft population, yielding tumor cure.

CONCLUSION

We posit homologous recombination repair represents a vulnerability determining colorectal cancer stem cell fate, approachable therapeutically using single dose radiotherapy.

Trends in Radiation Oncology Treatment Fractionation at a Single Academic Center, 2010-2020

Purpose

Recent clinical trials suggest hypofractionated treatment regimens are appropriate for treatment of many cancers. It is important to understand and document hypofractionation adoption because of its implications for treatment center patient volumes. There is no recent U.S. study of trends in hypofractionation adoption that includes comparisons of multiple disease sites and data since the onset of COVID-19. In this context, this study describes trends in treatment fractionation at a single academic center from 2010 to 2020.

Methods and Materials

From an institutional database, records were extracted for treatment of 4 disease site categories: all cancers, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and bone metastases. For each disease site, the mean number of fractions per treatment course was reported for each year of the study period. To explore whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased hypofractionation adoption, piecewise linear regression models were used to estimate a changepoint in the time trend of mean monthly number of fractions per treatment course and to evaluate whether this changepoint coincided with pandemic onset.

Results

The data set included 22,865 courses of radiation treatment and 375,446 treatment fractions. The mean number of fractions per treatment course for all cancers declined from 17.5 in 2010 to 13.6 in 2020. There was increased adoption of hypofractionation at this institution for all cancers and specifically for both breast and prostate cancer. For bone metastases, hypofractionation had largely been adopted before the study period. For most disease sites, adoption of hypofractionated treatment courses occurred before pandemic onset. Bone metastases was the only disease site where a pandemic-driven increase in hypofractionation adoption could not be ruled out.

Conclusions

This study reveals increasing use of hypofractionated regimens for a variety of cancers throughout the study period, which largely occurred before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic at this institution.

Propensity score-matched analysis comparing dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus external beam radiation therapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

Purpose

Dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and EBRT + high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost are guideline-recommended treatment options for localized prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term outcome and toxicity of dose-escalated EBRT versus EBRT + HDR-BT boost.

Methods

From 2002 to 2019, 744 consecutive patients received either EBRT or EBRT + HDR-BT boost, of whom 516 patients were propensity score matched. Median follow-up was 95.3 months. Cone beam CT image-guided EBRT consisted of 33 fractions of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost up to 76.23 Gy (D_Mean). Combined treatment was delivered as 46 Gy (D_Mean) EBRT, followed by two fractions HDR-BT boost with 9 Gy (D_90%). Propensity score matching was applied before analysis of the primary endpoint, estimated 10-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), and the secondary endpoints metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic parameters were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard modelling. Genitourinary (GU)/gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity evaluation used the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0).

Results

The estimated 10-year bRFS was 82.0% vs. 76.4% (p = 0.075) for EBRT alone versus combined treatment, respectively. The estimated 10-year MFS was 82.9% vs. 87.0% (p = 0.195) and the 10-year OS was 65.7% vs. 68.9% (p = 0.303), respectively. Cumulative 5‑year late GU ≥ grade 2 toxicities were seen in 23.6% vs. 19.2% (p = 0.086) and 5‑year late GI ≥ grade 2 toxicities in 11.1% vs. 5.0% of the patients (p = 0.002); cumulative 5‑year late grade 3 GU toxicity occurred in 4.2% vs. 3.6% (p = 0.401) and GI toxicity in 1.0% vs. 0.3% (p = 0.249), respectively.

Conclusion

Both treatment groups showed excellent long-term outcomes with low rates of severe toxicity.

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy versus Brachytherapy: Relative Strengths of Two Highly Efficient Options for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a valid option for the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. In randomized trials, it was found not inferior to conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). It also compares favorably to brachytherapy (BT) even if level 1 evidence is lacking. However, BT remains a strong competitor, especially for young patients, as series with 10-15 years of median follow-up have proven its efficacy over time. SBRT will thus have to confirm its effectiveness over the long-term as well. SBRT has the advantage over BT of less acute urinary toxicity and, more hypothetically, less sexual impairment. Data are limited regarding SBRT for high-risk disease while BT, as a boost after EBRT, has demonstrated superiority against EBRT alone in randomized trials. However, patients should be informed of significant urinary toxicity. SBRT is under investigation in strategies of treatment intensification such as combination of EBRT plus SBRT boost or focal dose escalation to the tumor site within the prostate. Our goal was to examine respective levels of evidence of SBRT and BT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in terms of oncologic outcomes, toxicity and quality of life, and to discuss strategies of treatment intensification.

Urethra Sparing With Target Motion Mitigation in Dose-Escalated Extreme Hypofractionated Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: 7-Year Results From a Phase II Study

Purpose

To explore whether the rectal distension-mediated technique, harnessing human physiology to achieve intrafractional prostate motion mitigation, enables urethra sparing by inverse dose painting, thus promoting dose escalation with extreme hypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods

Between June 2013 and December 2018, 444 patients received 5 × 9 Gy SABR over 5 consecutive days. Rectal distension-mediated SABR was employed via insertion of a 150-cm3 air-inflated endorectal balloon. A Foley catheter loaded with 3 beacon transponders was used for urethra visualization and online tracking. MRI-based planning using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Image Guided Radiotherapy (VMAT-IGRT) with inverse dose painting was employed in delivering the planning target volume (PTV) dose and in sculpting exposure of organs at risk (OARs). A 2-mm margin was used for PTV expansion, reduced to 0 mm at the interface with critical OARs. All plans fulfilled Dmean ≥45 Gy. Target motion ≥2 mm/5 s motions mandated treatment interruption and target realignment prior to completion of the planned dose delivery.

Results

Patient compliance to the rectal distension-mediated immobilization protocol was excellent, achieving reproducible daily prostate localization at a patient-specific retropubic niche. Online tracking recorded ≤1-mm intrafractional target deviations in 95% of treatment sessions, while target realignment in ≥2-mm deviations enabled treatment completion as scheduled in all cases. The cumulative incidence rates of late grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were 5.3% and 1.1%, respectively. The favorable toxicity profile was corroborated by patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir by 5 years was 0.19 ng/ml. The cumulative incidence rate of biochemical failure using the Phoenix definition was 2%, 16.6%, and 27.2% for the combined low/favorable-intermediate, unfavorable intermediate, and high-risk categories, respectively. Patients with a PSA failure underwent a 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) scan showing a 20.2% cumulative incidence of intraprostatic relapses in biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥3.

Conclusion

The rectal distension-mediated technique is feasible and well tolerated. Dose escalation to 45 Gy with urethra-sparing results in excellent toxicity profiles and PSA relapse rates similar to those reported by other dose-escalated regimens. The existence of intraprostatic recurrences in patients with high-risk features confirms the notion of a high α/β ratio in these phenotypes resulting in diminished effectiveness with hypofractionated dose escalation.

Injection of hydrogel spacer increased maximal intrafractional prostate motion in anterior and superior directions during volumetric modulated arc therapy-stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Background

The aim of this study was to clarify the association between intrafractional prostate shift and hydrogel spacer.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients who received definitive volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer with prostate motion monitoring in our institution in 2018–2019 were retrospectively evaluated. In order to move the rectum away from the prostate, hydrogel spacer (SpaceOAR system, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, the United States) injection was proposed to the patients as an option in case of meeting the indication of use. We monitored intrafractional prostate motion by using a 4-dimensional (4D) transperineal ultrasound device: the Clarity 4D ultrasound system (Elekta AB). The deviation of the prostate was monitored in each direction: superior-inferior, left–right, and anterior–posterior. We also calculated the vector length. The maximum intrafractional displacement (MID) per fraction for each direction was detected and mean of MIDs was calculated per patient. The MIDs in the non-spacer group and the spacer group were compared using the unpaired t-test.

Results

We reviewed 33 fractions in eight patients as the spacer group and 148 fractions in 30 patients as the non-spacer group. The superior MID was 0.47 ± 0.07 (mean ± SE) mm versus 0.97 ± 0.24 mm (P = 0.014), the inferior MID was 1.07 ± 0.11 mm versus 1.03 ± 0.25 mm (P = 0.88), the left MID was 0.74 ± 0.08 mm versus 0.87 ± 0.27 mm (P = 0.55), the right MID was 0.67 ± 0.08 mm versus 0.92 ± 0.21 mm (P = 0.17), the anterior MID was 0.45 ± 0.06 mm versus 1.16 ± 0.35 mm (P = 0.0023), and the posterior MID was 1.57 ± 0.17 mm versus 1.37 ± 0.22 mm (P = 0.56) in the non-spacer group and the spacer group, respectively. The max of VL was 2.24 ± 0.19 mm versus 2.89 ± 0.62 mm (P = 0.19), respectively.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that maximum intrafractional prostate motion during VMAT-SBRT was larger in patients with hydrogel spacer injection in the superior and anterior directions. Since this difference seemed not to disturb the dosimetric advantage of the hydrogel spacer, we do not recommend routine avoidance of the hydrogel spacer use.

An Overview of X-ray Photon Counting Spectral Imaging (x-CSI) with a Focus on Gold Nanoparticle Quantification in Oncology

This review article offers an overview of the differences between traditional energy integrating (EI) X-ray imaging and the new technique of X-ray photon counting spectral imaging (x-CSI). The review is motivated by the need to image gold nanoparticles (AuNP) in vivo if they are to be used clinically to deliver a radiotherapy dose-enhancing effect (RDEE). The aim of this work is to familiarise the reader with x-CSI as a technique and to draw attention to how this technique will need to develop to be of clinical use for the described oncological applications. This article covers the conceptual differences between x-CSI and EI approaches, the advantages of x-CSI, constraints on x-CSI system design, and the achievements of x-CSI in AuNP quantification. The results of the review show there are still approximately two orders of magnitude between the AuNP concentrations used in RDEE applications and the demonstrated detection limits of x-CSI. Two approaches to overcome this were suggested: changing AuNP design or changing x-CSI system design. Optimal system parameters for AuNP detection and general spectral performance as determined by simulation studies were different to those used in the current x-CSI systems, indicating potential gains that may be made with this approach.

Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: How Far Can We Go?

Following adoption of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy as a standard for localised prostate cancer, ultrahypofractioned radiotherapy delivered in five to seven fractions is rapidly being embraced by clinical practice and international guidelines. However, the question remains: how low can we go? Can radiotherapy for prostate cancer be delivered in fewer than five fractions? The current review summarises the evidence that radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer can be safely and effectively delivered in fewer than five fractions using high dose rate brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy. We also discuss important lessons learned from the single-fraction high dose rate brachytherapy experience.

Feasibility of Same-Day Prostate Fiducial Markers, Perirectal Hydrogel Spacer Placement, and Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Simulation for External Beam Radiation Therapy for Low-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

The use of prostate fiducial markers and perirectal hydrogel spacers can reduce the acute and late toxic effects associated with prostate radiation therapy. These procedures are usually performed days to weeks before simulation during a separate clinic visit to ensure resolution of procedure-related inflammation. The purpose of this study was to assess whether same-day intraprostatic fiducial marker placement, perirectal hydrogel injection, and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) simulation were feasible without adversely affecting hydrogel volume, perirectal spacing, or rectal dose. If feasible, performing these procedures on the same day as simulation would expedite the start of radiation therapy, improve patient convenience, and reduce costs.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-one patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who were enrolled on a prospective clinical trial (NCT01617161) underwent same-day marker placement, hydrogel injection, and CT and MRI simulation, then underwent T2 MRI verification scans 3 to 4 weeks later. The MRI scans were fused to the CT planning scans by clinical target volumes (CTVs) to generate comparison treatment plans (70 Gy in 28 fractions). Hydrogel volume and symmetry, perirectal spacing, CTV dose, and organ-at-risk dose were evaluated.

RESULTS

Verification scans occurred a mean of 24.9 ± 4.6 days after simulation and 9.3 ± 4.9 days after treatment start. Prostate volume did not change between scans (median, 67.3 ± 22.1 cm³ vs 64.1 ± 21.8 cm³; P = .64). The median hydrogel change between simulation and verification was ^-1.8% ± 4.5% (P = .27). No significant differences in perirectal spacing (midgland: 1.33 ± 0.45 cm vs 1.3 ± 0.7 cm; 1 cm superior: 1.25 ± 0.95 cm vs 1.43 ± 0.91 cm; 1 cm inferior: 1.16 ± 0.28 cm vs 1.41 ± 0.49 cm) were identified. No significant differences in rectal V66 (median 2.3 ± 2.18% vs 2.3 ± 2.28%; P = .99), V35 (median 14.79 ± 7.61 vs 14.67 ± 8.4; P = .73), or D1cc (65.7 ± 9.2 Gy vs 68.2 ± 9.0 Gy; P = .80) were found. All plans met CTV and organ-at-risk constraints.

CONCLUSION

Same-day placement of intraprostatic fiducial markers, perirectal hydrogel, and simulation scans was feasible and did not significantly affect hydrogel volume, position, CTV coverage, or rectal dose.

Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing of CT-Guided vs MR-Guided Prostate SBRT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a standard-of-care option for localized prostate cancer. While prostate SBRT has traditionally been delivered using computed-tomography-guided radiation therapy (CTgRT), MR-imaging-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) is now available. MRgRT offers real-time soft-tissue visualization and ease of adaptive planning, obviating the need for fiducial markers, and potentially allowing for smaller planning target volume (PTV) margins. Although prior studies have focused on evaluating the cost-effectiveness of MRgRT vs CTgRT from a payor perspective, the difference in provider costs to deliver such treatments remains unknown. This study thus used time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to determine the difference in provider resources consumed by delivering prostate SBRT via MRgRT vs CTgRT.

METHODS

Data was collected from a single academic institution where prostate SBRT is routinely performed using both CTgRT and MRgRT. Five-fraction SBRT (40 Gy total dose) was assumed to be delivered through volumetric-modulated arc therapy for CTgRT patients, and through step-and-shoot, fixed-gantry intensity-modulated radiation therapy for MRgRT patients. Process maps were constructed for each portion of the radiation delivery process via interviews/surveys with departmental personnel and by measuring CTgRT and MRgRT treatment times. Prior to simulation, only CTgRT patients underwent placement of three gold fiducial markers. Personnel capacity cost rates were calculated by dividing total personnel costs by the annual minutes worked by a given personnel. Equipment costs included both an annualized purchase price and annual maintenance costs. Ultimately, the total costs of care encompassing personnel, space/equipment, and materials were aggregated across the entire chain of care for both CTgRT and MRgRT patients in a base case.

RESULTS

Direct costs associated with delivering a 5-fraction course of prostate SBRT were $1,497 higher with MRgRT than with CTgRT - comprised of personnel costs ($210 higher with MRgRT), space/equipment ($1,542 higher with MRgRT), and materials ($255 higher with CTgRT). Only CTgRT patients underwent fiducial placement, which accounted for $591. MRgRT patients were assumed to undergo both CT simulation (for electron density calculation) and MRI simulation, with the former accounting for $168. Mean time spent by patients in the treatment vault per fraction was 20 minutes (range 15-26 minutes) for CTgRT, and 31 minutes (range 30-34 minutes) for MRgRT. Patient time spent during fiducial placement (CTgRT only) was 60 minutes. Modifying the number of fractions treated would result in the cost difference of $1,497 (5 fractions) changing to $441 (1 fraction) or to $2,025 (7 fractions).

CONCLUSION

This study provides an approximate comparison of the direct resources required for a radiation oncology provider to deliver prostate SBRT with CTgRT vs MRgRT. We await findings from the currently accruing phase III MIRAGE trial, which is comparing these modalities, and will subsequently measure acute and late genitourinary/gastrointestinal (GU/GI) toxicities, temporal change in quality-of-life outcomes, and 5-year biochemical, recurrence-free survival. Results from studies comparing the efficacy and safety of MRgRT vs CTgRT will ultimately allow us to put this cost difference into context.

Extreme Hypofractionation with SBRT in Localized Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among men around the world. Radiotherapy is a standard of care treatment option for men with localized prostate cancer. Over the years, radiation delivery modalities have contributed to increased precision of treatment, employing radiobiological insights to shorten the overall treatment time, improving the control of the disease without increasing toxicities. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) represents an extreme form of hypofractionated radiotherapy in which treatment is usually delivered in 1–5 fractions. This review assesses the main efficacy and toxicity data of SBRT in non-metastatic prostate cancer and discusses the potential to implement this scheme in routine clinical practice.

Automatic localization of the prostatic urethra for image guided radiation therapy

•

Prostatic urethra can be used for image guided radiation for prostate cancer.

•

Computer “finds” the urethra by digital subtraction of scans with / without contrast.

•

Urethra segmentation used to setup the patient and position prostate as in simulation.

•

A catheter with continuous aerated gel flow is used to detect the urethra under US.

Treatment of prostate cancer with radiation therapy (RT) requires image guided RT (IGRT) to focus the radiation on the target volumes while minimizing doses to organs at risk. Here we describe a urinary catheter that allows imaging of the prostatic urethra and uses it for automatic localization of the prostate for IGRT. The catheter has a contrast lumen that can be empty or full with contrast. Computerized tomography is performed twice, with contrast lumen empty and full, allowing urethral autosegmentation using digital subtraction. Under ultrasound, continuous urethral visualization is possible by pumping aerated gel in- and out of the contrast lumen.