Relapse and Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Older Matched Sibling Donors vs Younger Matched Unrelated Donors

PTCy vs CNI-based GVHD prophylaxis in HLA-matched transplants for Hodgkin lymphoma: a study of the LWP of the EBMT

ABSTRACT

Studies comparing the efficacy of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) to conventional calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimens in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are scarce. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with HL undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from HLA-matched donors who received GVHD prophylaxis with either PTCy- or conventional CNI-based regimens, using data reported in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database between January 2015 and December 2022. Among the cohort, 270 recipients received conventional CNI-based prophylaxis and 176 received PTCy prophylaxis. Notably, PTCy prophylaxis was associated with delayed hematopoietic recovery but also with a lower risk of chronic (25% vs 43%; P < .001) and extensive chronic GVHD (13% vs 28%; P = .003) compared with the CNI-based cohort. The 2-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality and relapse was 11% vs 17% (P = .12) and 17% vs 30% (P = .007) for PTCy- and CNI-based, respectively. Moreover, the 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) were all significantly better in the PTCy group compared with the CNI-based group: 85% vs 72% (P = .005), 72% vs 53% (P < .001), and 59% vs 31% (P < .001), respectively. In multivariable analysis, PTCy was associated with a lower risk of chronic and extensive chronic GVHD, reduced relapse, and better OS, PFS, and GRFS than the CNI-based platform. Our findings suggest that PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis offers more favorable outcomes than conventional CNI-based prophylaxis in adult patients with HL undergoing HSCT from HLA-matched donors.

Older MRD vs. younger MUD in patients older than 50 years with AML in remission using post-transplant cyclophosphamide

An increasing number of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are offered an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Normally, older patients have older matched related donors (MRD). Matched unrelated donors (MUD) are an important alternative, but it remains unclear whether a younger MUD is associated with better outcomes, especially in the context of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We compared outcomes of patients older than 50 years with AML in first complete remission (CR1) and receiving a first HSCT from a 10/10 MUD aged younger than 40 years to those receiving a graft from a MRD aged older than 50 years, using PTCy and with well-known transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score. A total of 345 consecutive patients were included and classified according to TCI score as low, intermediate, or high. On multivariable analysis in the TCI-intermediate/high group, MUD was associated with better graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival, lower non-relapse mortality and lower relapse incidence. For patients receiving a TCI-low regimen, outcomes are independent on the type of donor. In patients with AML in CR1, older than 50 years and receiving a TCI-intermediate/high conditioning regimen using PTCy, a MUD younger than 40 years is preferable over a MRD older than 50 years.

Unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donor registries: present reality and future prospects

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Stem cell donor registries play an important role in providing stem cell products from unrelated donors to patients with severe blood diseases. In this review, important aspects of donor registry work, current challenges and possible future developments are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current growth in global unrelated stem cell donations is in line with the long-term trend, indicating that donor registries have overcome the COVID-19 pandemic. A key challenge for donor registries is the recruitment of donors from disadvantaged populations to create greater equity in access to unrelated stem cell transplantation. In addition, recruiting young donors and increasing the availability of donors who are already registered are important goals. In recent years, numerous studies have looked at the context of these themes and the development of possible solutions.

SUMMARY

The international community of donor registries, together with the World Marrow Donor Association, has helped many patients in need of a stem cell transplant over the past decades and is, therefore, a bright example of international collaboration for a good cause. It is currently addressing a number of challenges to effectively help as many patients as possible from various populations also in the future.

Younger unrelated donors may be preferable over HLA match in the PTCy era: a study from the ALWP of the EBMT

ABSTRACT

There is a paucity of information on how to select the most appropriate unrelated donor (UD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of 10/10 matched UDs (MUDs) and 9/10 mismatched UDs (MMUDs) that may affect transplant outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first or second complete remission (CR1 or CR2). The primary end point was leukemia-free survival (LFS). Overall, 1011 patients were included with a median age of 54 years (range, 18-77). Donors had a median age of 29 years (range, 18-64); 304 (30%) were females, of which 150 (15% of the whole group) were donors to male recipients, and 621 (61%) were MUDs; 522 (52%) had negative cytomegalovirus (CMV-neg) serostatus, of which 189 (19%) were used for CMV-neg recipients. Donor age older than 30 years had a negative impact on relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.8), LFS (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.12-1.74), overall survival (HR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.85) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) free, relapse-free survival (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.56). In addition, CMV-neg donors for CMV-neg recipients were associated with improved LFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.99). The use of MMUD and female donors for male recipients did not significantly impact any transplant outcomes. For patients undergoing HSCT from a UD with PTCy for AML, donor age <30 years significantly improves survival. In this context, donor age might be prioritized over HLA match considerations. In addition, CMV-neg donors are preferable for CMV-neg recipients. However, further research is needed to validate and refine these recommendations.

Management of adult patients with CMML undergoing allo-HCT: recommendations from the EBMT PH&G Committee

ABSTRACT

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a heterogeneous disease presenting with either myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic features. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only potentially curative option, but the inherent toxicity of this procedure makes the decision to proceed to allo-HCT challenging, particularly because patients with CMML are mostly older and comorbid. Therefore, the decision between a nonintensive treatment approach and allo-HCT represents a delicate balance, especially because prospective randomized studies are lacking and retrospective data in the literature are conflicting. International consensus on the selection of patients and the ideal timing of allo-HCT, specifically in CMML, could not be reached in international recommendations published 6 years ago. Since then, new, CMML-specific data have been published. The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Practice Harmonization and Guidelines (PH&G) Committee assembled a panel of experts in the field to provide the first best practice recommendations on the role of allo-HCT specifically in CMML. Recommendations were based on the results of an international survey, a comprehensive review of the literature, and expert opinions on the subject, after structured discussion and circulation of recommendations. Algorithms for patient selection, timing of allo-HCT during the course of the disease, pretransplant strategies, allo-HCT modality, as well as posttransplant management for patients with CMML were outlined. The keynote message is, that once a patient has been identified as a transplant candidate, upfront transplantation without prior disease-modifying treatment is preferred to maximize chances of reaching allo-HCT whenever possible, irrespective of bone marrow blast counts.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Current Status and Future Directions of Donor Selection

The landscape of HLA matching in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is continuously advancing, introducing more nuanced criteria beyond traditional 10/10 HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 allele matching. For 10/10 matched donors, prioritizing a donor with a "core" permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch is recommended over "noncore" permissive mismatches, with nonpermissive mismatches being the least prefered. In the one-antigen mismatched setting (7/8 HLA-matched), HLA-C matching, particularly avoiding high-expression mismatches at residues 116 or 77/80, is preferred over HLA-A or HLA-B mismatches. HLA B-leader matching is beneficial in both one-antigen mismatched and haploidentical HCT. Additionally, specific HLA mismatches in haploidentical HCT, such as DRB1 mismatches with DQB1 matches and DPB1 nonpermissive mismatches are linked to better outcomes. Among non-HLA factors, evidence consistently underscores the pivotal impact of donor age on overall survival. For HLA-mismatched transplants, including haploidentical HCT, avoidance of donors against whom the recipient has preformed donor-specific antibodies is paramount. Selecting a cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative donor is important particularly for CMV-negative recipients; however, more research is needed in the letermovir prophylaxis era. The impact of ABO-matching on transplant outcomes is debatable. Other unanswered questions include defining "younger" donors and establishing hierarchy in donor selection based on factors like CMV status, ABO compatibility, or sex-mismatch, to name a few. Future research addressing these issues will refine donor selection algorithms and improve transplant success. In conclusion, selecting a donor for HCT requires multifaceted considerations, integrating evolving HLA-matching criteria and non-HLA factors, to optimize HCT outcomes in this rapidly advancing field.

Combined effect of unrelated donor age and HLA peptide-binding motif match status on HCT outcomes

ABSTRACT

An HLA-mismatched unrelated donor who is class I peptide-binding motif (PBM)-matched is preferred over a PBM-mismatched donor. We hypothesized that using a younger donor (aged ≤35 years vs >35 years) could compensate for the inferior overall survival (OS) associated with PBM mismatches. We compared 6 groups: HLA-matched/younger donor (n = 10 531), HLA-matched/older donor (n = 3572), PBM-matched/younger donor (n = 357), PBM-matched/older donor (n = 257), PBM-mismatched/younger donor (n = 616), and PBM-mismatched/older donor (n = 339) in patients undergoing transplantation with conventional graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, HLA-matched/younger donors were associated with superior OS relative to any other group. Pairwise comparisons showed that donor age significantly impacted OS in both HLA-matched and HLA-mismatched groups. Moreover, younger donors appeared to negate the detrimental effect of PBM mismatching: the PBM-matched/younger donor group had similar OS as the HLA-matched/older donor group and the PBM-mismatched/younger donor group had similar OS as the PBM-matched/older donor group. Our study suggests that older unrelated donor age and PBM mismatching confer similarly adverse effects on OS and the impacts are additive, a finding which may widen the "acceptable" donor pool. The best OS is observed with HLA-matched/younger donors and the worst with PBM-mismatched/older donors. These findings should be validated with other data sets and with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis.

Age barriers in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: Raising the silver curtain

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is no longer exclusively for the young. With an aging population, development of non-intensive remission-inducing strategies for hematologic malignancies, and novel graft-versus-host disease-prevention platforms, an older population of patients is pursuing HCT. The evolving population of HCT recipients requires an overhaul in the way we risk-stratify and optimize patients prior to HCT. Here, we review the history and current state of HCT for older adults and propose an assessment and intervention flow to bridge the gaps in today's clinical guidelines.

Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation using HLA-haploidentical donor with post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus HLA-matched sibling donor for lymphoma

Data comparing HLA-haploidentical donors and HLA-matched sibling donors (MSDs) in peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for lymphoma are scarce. We retrospectively analyzed 465 patients with lymphoma aged 16 years or older who underwent PBSCT using haploidentical donors with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haplo) (n = 166) or MSDs with calcineurin inhibitor-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (n = 299). Two-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) in the PTCy-haplo and MSD groups were 49.2% versus 51.9% (P = 0.64), 38.0% versus 39.9% (P = 0.97), and 27.7% versus 18.5% (P = 0.006), respectively. In multivariable analyses, PTCy-haplo recipients had slower neutrophil recovery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; P < 0.001) and platelet recovery (HR, 0.54; P < 0.001), lower risk of chronic GVHD (HR, 0.64; P = 0.038) and extensive chronic GVHD (HR, 0.45; P = 0.008), and better GRFS (HR, 0.66; P = 0.003) than MSD transplant recipients. OS, PFS, relapse or progression, and non-relapse mortality were similar between the groups. The difference might be mainly due to PTCy use rather than donor type; however, the results suggested that PTCy-haplo could be a possible option as an alternative to conventional MSD transplantation for lymphoma in PBSCT.

The role of immune reconstitution in relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Leukemia relapse following stem cell transplantation remains a significant barrier to long-term remission. Timely and balanced immune recovery after transplantation is crucial for preventing leukemia relapse.

AREAS COVERED

After an extensive literature search of PubMed and Web of Science through October 2023, we provide an overview of the dynamics of immune reconstitution and its role in controlling leukemia relapse. We also discuss strategies to promote immune reconstitution and reduce disease recurrence following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

EXPERT OPINION

Immune reconstitution after transplantation has substantial potential to prevent relapse and might predict disease recurrence and prognosis. High dimensional cytometry, multi-omics, and T cell repertoire analysis allow for a more comprehensive and detailed understanding of the immune system's dynamics post-transplantation, and contribute to the identification of rare immune cell subsets or potential biomarkers associated with successful immune reconstitution or increased risk of complications. Strategies to enhance the immune system, such as adoptive immunotherapy and cytokine-based therapy, have great potential for reducing leukemia relapse after transplantation. Future research directions should focus on refining patient selection for these therapies, implementing appropriate and timely treatment, investigating combination approaches to maximize therapeutic outcomes, and achieving a robust graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect while minimizing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) for optimal results.

Factors Associated with Opting Out of an Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donor Registry: Differences and Similarities across Five Key Groups of Young Race/Ethnically Diverse Potential Donors in the United States

Young adults from underserved racial/ethnic groups are critically needed as unrelated hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors, yet they are more likely than other groups to opt out of donation after having matched a patient. Understanding which factors are most strongly associated with opting out among young underserved racial/ ethnic registered donors compared with their White counterparts will provide the basis for specific interventions to improve donor retention. We sought to determine the key, modifiable psychosocial, registry-related, and donation-related characteristics that are uniquely associated with opting out across 5 key racial/ethnic groups of young HSC donor registry members who had been contacted as a potential match for a patient. This study examines data from a large cross-sectional survey of young (age 18 to 30) registry members shortly after they preliminarily matched a patient (CT-stage) and continued toward or opted out of donation (CT-C and CT-NI), stratified by racial/ethnic group and sex. We assessed psychosocial, registry-related, and donation-related characteristics for all participants. We used chi-squared and F tests to assess differences between racial/ethnic groups. A separate logistic regression analysis for each racial/ethnic group was conducted to quantify adjusted associations between each variable and opting out. Then, we compared these associations across the racial/ethnic groups by evaluating the interaction effect between each variable and racial/ethnic group, with the same outcome (CT-C versus CT-NI) in question. Nine hundred thirty-five participants were surveyed, including 284 White, 165 Hispanic, 191 Black, 192 Asian/Pacific Islander, and 103 Multiracial/multiethnic participants. There were significant differences across racial/ethnic groups in values/goals, religious objections to donation, HSC-related medical mistrust, and parental involvement in donation decisions. Adjusted logistic regression subgroup analyses indicated that ambivalence was strongly associated with opting out across all racial/ethnic groups. Greater focus on intrinsic life goals (e.g., raising a family, becoming a community leader, influencing social values) was associated with opting out in the Multiracial/multiethnic, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander groups. Healthcare mistrust and insufficient registry contact was a significant factor for Hispanic participants. Protective factors against opting out included remembering joining the registry (Black participants), and parental support for donation decision (Asian/Pacific Islander participants). The performance of each logistic regression model was strong, with area-under-the curve ≥.88, CT-stage outcome classification accuracy ≥89%, and good fit between expected and observed opt-out probabilities. In the analysis across different racial/ethnic groups, the only significant interaction was race/ethnicity by whether more contact with the registry would have changed the decision at CT-stage; this variable was significant only for the Hispanic group. In the within-group analysis for Hispanic participants, the "more registry contact" variable was strongly associated with opting out (odds ratio 5.8, P = .03). Consistent with a growing body of HSC donor research, ambivalence was a key factor associated with opting-out for all racial/ethnic groups. Other key variables were differentially associated with opting-out depending on racial/ethnic group. Our study highlights key variables that registries should focus on as they develop targeted and tailored strategies to enhance commitment and reduce attrition of potential donors.

Transplant Eligible and Ineligible Elderly Patients with AML-A Genomic Approach and Next Generation Questions

The management of elderly patients diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is complicated by high relapse risk and comorbidities that often preclude access to allogeneic hematopoietic cellular transplantation (allo-HCT). In recent years, fast-paced FDA drug approval has reshaped the therapeutic landscape, with modest, albeit promising improvement in survival. Still, AML outcomes in elderly patients remain unacceptably unfavorable highlighting the need for better understanding of disease biology and tailored strategies. In this review, we discuss recent modifications suggested by European Leukemia Network 2022 (ELN-2022) risk stratification and review recent aging cell biology advances with the discussion of four AML cases. While an older age, >60 years, does not constitute an absolute contraindication for allo-HCT, the careful patient selection based on a detailed and multidisciplinary risk stratification cannot be overemphasized.

How I reduce and treat posttransplant relapse of MDS

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only potentially curative option for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Advances in conditioning regimens and supportive measures have reduced treatment-related mortality and increased the role of transplantation, leading to more patients undergoing HSCT. However, posttransplant relapse of MDS remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for this procedure, necessitating expert management and ongoing results analysis. In this article, we review treatment options and our institutional approaches to managing MDS relapse after HSCT, using illustrative clinical cases that exemplify different clinical manifestations and management of relapse. We address areas of controversy relating to conditioning regimen intensity, chemotherapeutic bridging, and donor selection. In addition, we discuss future directions for advancing the field, including (1) the need for prospective clinical trials separating MDS from acute myeloid leukemia and focusing on posttransplant relapse, as well as (2) the validation of measurable residual disease methodologies to guide timely interventions.

Cellular therapies in older adults with hematological malignancies: A case-based, state-of-the-art review

Cellular therapies, including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), and chimeric antigen receptor- (CAR-) T cell therapies are essential treatment modalities for many hematological malignancies. Although their use in older adults has substantially increased within the past decades, cellular therapies represent intensive treatment approaches that exclude a large percentage of older adults due to comorbidities and frailty. Under- and overtreatment in older adults with hematologic malignancy is a challenge and many treatment decisions are influenced by chronologic age. The advent of efficient and well-tolerated newer treatment approaches for multiple myeloma has challenged the role of ASCT. In the modern era, there are no randomized clinical trials of transplant versus non-transplant strategies for patients ≥65 years. Nonetheless, ASCT is feasible for selected older patients and does not result in long-term compromise in quality of life. AlloHCT is the only curative approach for acute myeloid leukemia of intermediate and unfavourable risk but carries a significant risk for non-relapse mortality depending on comorbidities, general fitness, and transplant-specific characteristics, such as intensity of conditioning and donor choice. However, alloHCT is feasible in appropriately-selected older adults. Early referral for evaluation is strongly encouraged as this is the most obvious barrier. CAR-T cell therapies have shown unprecedented clinical efficacy and durability in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Its use is well tolerated in older adults, although evidence comes from limited case numbers. Whether patients who are deemed unfit for ASCT qualify for CAR-T cell therapy remains elusive, but the tolerability and efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy appears promising, especially for older patients. The evidence from randomized trials is strong in favor of using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to reduce treatment-related toxicities and guide treatment intensity in the care for solid tumors; its use for evaluation of cellular therapies is less evidence-based. However, CGA can provide useful information on patients' fitness, resilient mechanisms, and reveal potential optimization strategies for compensating for vulnerabilities. In this narrative review, we will discuss key questions on cellular therapies in older adults based on illustrative patient cases.

Providing hematopoietic stem cell products from unrelated donors to the world: DKMS donor centers and DKMS Registry

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation is a curative therapy for many severe blood diseases. As many patients have no suitable family donor, large unrelated donor registries and donor centers have been established in many countries, along with an international system for the provision of unrelated donor HSC products. As an essential part of this system, DKMS operates donor centers in 7 countries with a total of 12.2 million donors and over 114,000 donations so far, and a multinational donor registry. In 2022, DKMS donors contributed 57.5% of all cross-border donations worldwide. In this review, we describe the international system for the provision of unrelated donor HSC products as well as tasks and responsibilities of donor registries and donor centers. We also discuss relevant aspects of DKMS donor centers, namely donor file composition, matching and donation probabilities and actual donations, and the unique multinational approach of the DKMS Registry.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in MDS patients of older age

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has evolved to an essential treatment in younger and more recently in elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), the age group with the highest incidence. Less intense conditioning regimens and improvements in supportive therapy have reduced considerably transplant related mortality and in the same time increased the access to this curative treatment. Timing of HCT in the course of the disease assumes a crucial role. Detection of disease progression, geriatric assessment, comorbidity evaluation, and identification of transplant-specific risks are becoming increasingly important in this context. Novel statistical methods, molecular biomarkers, and quantification of tumor burden pre- and post-HCT will play an essential role in years to come. More effective and less toxic treatments to reduce the tumor burden before and/or after HCT are expected to improve the outcome. In this review article we discuss the current views and what we can expect.

Comparison of Allogeneic Transplant Outcomes Between Matched Sibling Donors and Alternative Donors in Patients Over 50 Years of Age with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 8/8 Allele-Matched Unrelated Donors and Unrelated Cord Blood Provide Better Leukemia-Free Survival Compared with Matched Sibling Donors During Nonremission Status

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The increased availability of alternative donor sources has broadened donor types for older patients without HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD). It is uncertain if an MSD should be the first option for allogeneic HCT in patients with AML over 50 years of age. The objective of this study was to compare survival and other post-transplant outcomes between MSDs, 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donors (MUDs), 7/8 allele-MUDs, unrelated cord blood (UCB), and haploidentical donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. We conducted a retrospective study to compare outcomes in 5704 patients with AML over 50 years of age and receiving allogeneic HCT between 2013 and 2021, using either MSD, 8/8 allele-MUD, 7/8 allele-MUD, UCB, or haploidentical donors in Japan. Complete remission (CR) and nonremission at HCT were analyzed separately for all analyses. In total, 3041 patients were CR, and 2663 patients were nonremission at the time of HCT. In multivariate analysis, donor type did not determine overall survival, irrespective of disease status at HCT. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) was significantly better for 8/8 allele-MUD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.93; P = .005) and UCB (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.88; P < .001), but not for 7/8 allele-MUD (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.19; P = .794), and haploidentical donor (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.05; P = .146) compared to the MSD group in nonremission status. However, donor type did not determine LFS among CR status. Relapse rates were significantly lower for 8/8 allele-MUD and UCB, whereas nonrelapse mortality was higher for UCB compared to the MSD group among both CR and nonremission status. Our registry-based study demonstrated that MSDs do not lead to superior survival compared to alternative donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. Furthermore, 8/8 allele-MUDs and UCB provide better LFS compared with MSDs during nonremission status. Therefore, MSD is not necessarily the best donor option for allogeneic HCT in this population.

Single-unit unrelated cord blood transplantation versus HLA-matched sibling transplantation in adults with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: A registry-based study from the adult MDS working group of the Japanese society for transplantation and cellular therapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only potential curative therapeutic modality for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Within HCT, the advancement of cord blood transplantation (CBT) procedures has resulted in a drastic expansion of CBT as a donor source for MDS. However, data comparing matched sibling donors (MSDs) HCT with CBT for advanced MDS, which was defined as refractory anemia with an excess of blasts (RAEB)-1 and RAEB-2 according to the World Health Organization classification at the time of HCT, have not been explored. We retrospectively compared survival and other posttransplant outcomes in 999 adult patients with advanced MDS after receiving allogeneic HCT in Japan between 2011 and 2020, using either MSD (n = 331) or single-unit unrelated cord blood (UCB) (n = 668). In the multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.34; P = 0.347), disease-free survival (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84-1.23; P = 0.845), relapse (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.68-1.15; P = 0.370), or non-relapse mortality (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.87-1.50; P = 0.310) between MSD recipients and UCB recipients. UCB was significantly associated with lower neutrophil (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.24-0.33; P < 0.001) and lower platelet (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.23-0.36; P < 0.001) recovery compared to MSD. UCB was significantly associated with a lower incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75; P < 0.001) and extensive chronic GVHD (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.67; P < 0.001) compared to MSD. Similar results were observed after adjusting for differences between MSD and UCB recipients by propensity score matching analysis. Our study demonstrated that single CBT and MSD HCT had similar survival outcomes for adult patients with advanced MDS despite the lower hematopoietic recovery in CBT recipients and higher chronic GVHD in MSD recipients.

Effect of donor age in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation vary by conditioning intensity and recipient age

We investigated the impact of donor age (younger [≤35 years] vs. older [>35 years]) after accounting for other non-HLA and HLA factors on outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (n = 790). The effect differed by conditioning-partly related to the differences in the recipient age in myeloablative (MAC; median 46 years) versus reduced-intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA; median 61 years) groups. With MAC (n = 320), donor age had no impact on acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but older donors were associated with a significantly higher risk of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-2.30, p = .02) independent of recipient age and other factors. Donor age had no impact on either relapse or non-relapse mortality (NRM). The impact of donor/recipient age on overall survival changed over time. Older donors were associated with significantly higher late overall mortality (>6 months) in younger recipients (≤ 50 years; HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.03-4.6, p = .04) but not older recipients. With RIC/NMA (n = 470), neither recipient's nor donor's age influenced the risk of GVHD. Donor age had no significant impact on the risk of relapse, but older donors were associated with a significantly higher risk of NRM (HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.02-2.6, p = .04) independent of recipient age. Older donor age was associated with significantly higher late overall mortality (>9 months) in older recipients (>50 years; HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.0-2.67; p = .049) but not in younger recipients. Donor selection based on donor age may require a tailored approach for a particular recipient.

DNA methylation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells from donor peripheral blood to patient bone marrow: implications for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a life-saving treatment for selected hematological malignancies. So far, it remains unclear whether transplanted hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) undergo epigenetic changes upon engraftment in recipient bone marrow (BM) after AHSCT and whether these changes might be useful in the transplant diagnostics. The purpose of this study was to characterize the whole genome methylation profile of HSPCs following AHSCT. Moreover, the relationship between the observed methylation signature and patient outcome was analyzed. Mobilized peripheral blood (mPB)-HSPCs from seven donors and BM-HSPCs longitudinally collected from transplanted patients with hematological malignancies up to one year from AHSCT (a total of twenty-eight samples) were analyzed using DNA methylation based-arrays. The obtained data showed that DNA methylation of mPB-HSPCs differs between young and adult donors and changes following HSPC engraftment in the BM of recipient patients. Looking at methylation in promoter regions, at 30 days post-AHSCT, BM-HSPCs showed a higher number of differentially methylated genes (DMGs) compared to those of mPB-HSPCs, with a prevalent hyper-methylation. These changes were maintained during all the analyzed time points, and methylation became like the donors after one year from transplant. Functional analysis of these DMGs showed an enrichment in cell adhesion, differentiation and cytokine (interleukin-2, -5 and -7) production and signaling pathways. Of note, DNA methylation analysis allowed to identify a potential "cancer/graft methylation signature" of transplant failure. It was evident in the latest available post-transplant BM-HSPC sample (at 160 days) and surprisingly already in early phase (at 30 days) in patients whose transplant was doomed to fail. Overall, the analysis of HSPC methylation profile could offer useful prognostic information to potentially assess engraftment success and predict graft failure in AHSCT.

Choosing Between Older Matched Sibling Donor and Younger Matched Unrelated Donor in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

The choice between an older matched sibling donor (MSD) and a younger matched unrelated donor (MUD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a subject of ongoing debate. In this single-center retrospective study of 377 patients who received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplants for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we compared outcomes of 85 patients who received grafts from MSDs age >60 years and 292 patients who received grafts from MUDs age <30 years. Compared to recipients of MSD transplants, recipients of MUD transplants were younger and more likely to receive dual T cell depletion (TCD), a higher CD34+ cell dose, and a fresh graft. Recipients of MSD transplants were maintained on immunosuppressive therapy longer than those who received MUD grafts. We found no differences in overall survival, relapse-free survival, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, engraftment, graft failure, and acute GVHD between recipients of MSD grafts and recipients of MUD grafts. We report a higher 30-day incidence, but not 1-year incidence, of bloodstream infections among recipients of MUD transplants compared to subjects who received their grafts from a MSD. The incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was higher in MSD graft recipients compared with MUD graft recipients in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. Although this difference could reflect the greater use of dual TCD, known to be associated with very low rates of chronic GVHD in MUD transplant recipients, the incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was no different between MSD and MUD transplant recipients following propensity score matching, suggesting that other variables could be responsible. Taken together, our data suggest that in patients with AML or MDS who receive PBSC transplants, such factors as convenience, ease of access, and costs should be considered when selecting an older MSD over a younger MUD.

Machine Learning Improves Risk Stratification in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: An Analysis of the Spanish Group of Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematological stem cell disorders characterized by dysplasia, cytopenias, and increased risk of acute leukemia. As prognosis differs widely between patients, and treatment options vary from observation to allogeneic stem cell transplantation, accurate and precise disease risk prognostication is critical for decision making. With this aim, we retrieved registry data from MDS patients from 90 Spanish institutions. A total of 7202 patients were included, which were divided into a training (80%) and a test (20%) set. A machine learning technique (random survival forests) was used to model overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS). The optimal model was based on 8 variables (age, gender, hemoglobin, leukocyte count, platelet count, neutrophil percentage, bone marrow blast, and cytogenetic risk group). This model achieved high accuracy in predicting OS (c-indexes; 0.759 and 0.776) and LFS (c-indexes; 0.812 and 0.845). Importantly, the model was superior to the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) and the age-adjusted IPSS-R. This difference persisted in different age ranges and in all evaluated disease subgroups. Finally, we validated our results in an external cohort, confirming the superiority of the Artificial Intelligence Prognostic Scoring System for MDS (AIPSS-MDS) over the IPSS-R, and achieving a similar performance as the molecular IPSS. In conclusion, the AIPSS-MDS score is a new prognostic model based exclusively on traditional clinical, hematological, and cytogenetic variables. AIPSS-MDS has a high prognostic accuracy in predicting survival in MDS patients, outperforming other well-established risk-scoring systems.

Younger Matched Unrelated Donors Confer Decreased Relapse Risk Compared to Older Sibling Donors in Older Patients with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) offers cure for older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), disease relapse remains a major issue. Whether matched sibling donors (MSDs) are still the preferred donor choice compared to younger matched unrelated donors (MUDs) in the contemporary era of improved transplantation practices remains unknown. This retrospective cohort registry study queried the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database in patients with B cell ALL (B-ALL) age ≥ 50 years undergoing alloHCT from older MSDs (age ≥ 50 years) or younger MUDs (age ≤ 35 years) between 2011 and 2018. The study included common allograft types, conditioning regimens, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis strategies. The primary outcome was relapse risk, and secondary outcomes included nonrelapse mortality (NRM), GVHD, leukemia-free survival (LFS), and overall survival (OS). Among 925 eligible patients in the study cohort, 386 underwent alloHCT with an older MSD (median donor age, 58 years) and 539 underwent alloHCT from a younger MUD (median donor age, 25 year). In multivariable analysis, younger MUDs conferred a significantly decreased risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR], .68; P = .002) compared with older MSDs. The adjusted cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years was significantly lower with younger MUDs than with older MSDs (26% versus 37%; P = .001). Younger MUDs were associated with a greater risk of chronic GVHD compared to older MSDs (HR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10 to 1.61; P = .003). Compared to older MSDs, younger MUDs conferred an increased NRM (HR, 1.38; P = .02) and higher adjusted cumulative incidence of NRM at 5 years (31% versus 22%; P = .006). There were no differences in post-alloHCT OS or LFS rates between younger MUDs and older MSDs (OS: HR, 1.09; [P = .37]; LFS: HR, .95 [P = .57]). The use of younger MUDs could be considered as a possible way to prevent relapse after alloHCT in older adults with ALL. Combining the use of younger MUDs with improved strategies to reduce GVHD merits further exploration to improve outcomes.

Impact of Donor Age on Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) provides cure for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, disease relapse remains a major concern. Based on recent data suggesting that younger donor age confers the greatest benefit for alloHCT with matched unrelated donors (MUDs), we attempted to answer a practical question: which donor type provides the best outcomes when an older patient with AML has a matched sibling donor (MSD, also older) versus the best MUD? This retrospective cohort registry study accessed data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) in patients with AML age ≥ 50 years undergoing alloHCT from older MSDs (age ≥ 50 years) or younger MUDs (age ≤ 35 years) between 2011 and 2018. The study included common allograft types, conditioning regimens, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The primary outcome was relapse risk. Secondary outcomes included nonrelapse mortality (NRM), GVHD, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival. Among 4684 eligible patients, 1736 underwent alloHCT with an older MSD (median donor age, 60 years), and 2948 underwent alloHCT from a younger MUD (median donor age, 25 years). In multivariable analysis, compared to older MSDs, the use of younger MUDs conferred a decreased relapse risk (hazard ratio [HR], .86; P = .005) and a significantly lower adjusted 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (35% versus 41%; P = .003), but was associated with an increased risk for chronic GVHD (HR, 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 1.29; P = .0002) and greater NRM only in the earlier period of 2011 to 2015 (HR, 1.24; P = .016). The corresponding NRM rates were significantly lower in the more recent period of 2016 to 2018 (HR, .78; P = .017). The adjusted 5-year DFS probability was 44% (95% CI, 42% to 46%) with an alloHCT from younger MUDs compared to 41% (95% CI, 38% to 43%) with older MSDs (P = .04). In summary, for older patients with AML undergoing alloHCT, the use of younger MUDs is associated with decreased relapse risk and improved DFS compared with the use of older MSDs.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with AML aged 70 years or older in first remission. A study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Accessibility to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) programs for older patients is growing constantly. We report on the clinical outcomes of a group of 701 adults aged ≥70 years, with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1), who received a first HCT, from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD), 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donors (UD), 9/10 HLA-mismatched unrelated donors (mUD) or haploidentical (Haplo) donors. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 48.1%, leukemia-free survival (LFS) 45.3%, relapse incidence (RI) 25.2%, non-relapse mortality (NRM) 29.5% and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), 33.4%. Compared to MSD, patients transplanted from Haplo and UD presented lower RI (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.8, p = 0.02 and HR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.28-0.69, p = 0.001, respectively); this translated into prolonged LFS for Haplo (HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39-0.99, p = 0.04). Patients transplanted from mUD exhibited the highest NRM incidence (HR 2.33, 95% CI: 1.26-4.31, p = 0.007). HCT in selected adult CR1 AML patients >70 years is feasible and could be associated with good clinical outcomes. Prospective clinical trials are warranted.

Should a matched sibling donor still be considered the primary option for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients over 50 years of age with myelodysplastic syndrome?

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors (MSDs) are the preferred choice for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is most frequently diagnosed in the elderly, MSDs are also likely to be of advanced age. It is unclear whether an MSD should be considered the primary choice for allogeneic HCT in elderly patients with MDS. We retrospectively compared survival and other outcomes in 1787 patients with MDS over 50 years of age and receiving allogeneic HCT between 2014 and 2020, using either MSD (n = 214), 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donor (MUD) (n = 562), 7/8 allele-MUD (n = 334), or unrelated cord blood (UCB) (n = 677) in Japan. In multivariate analysis, compared to MSD transplants, the risk of relapse was significantly lower following 8/8MUD transplants (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; P = 0.047), whereas non-relapse mortality was significantly higher following UCB transplants (HR, 1.43; P = 0.041). However, donor type did not determine overall survival, disease-free survival, or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival, but chronic GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was better after UCB (HR, 0.80; P = 0.025) and 8/8MUD (HR, 0.81; P = 0.032) compared to MSD transplants. Our study demonstrated that MSDs are not superior to alternative HCT methods, such as 8/8MUD, 7/8MUD, or UCB, in this population.

Young donor hematopoietic stem cells revitalize aged or damaged bone marrow niche by transdifferentiating into functional niche cells

The bone marrow niche maintains hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) homeostasis and declines in function in the physiologically aging population and in patients with hematological malignancies. A fundamental question is now whether and how HSCs are able to renew or repair their niche. Here, we show that disabling HSCs based on disrupting autophagy accelerated niche aging in mice, whereas transplantation of young, but not aged or impaired, donor HSCs normalized niche cell populations and restored niche factors in host mice carrying an artificially harassed niche and in physiologically aged host mice, as well as in leukemia patients. Mechanistically, HSCs, identified using a donor lineage fluorescence-tracing system, transdifferentiate in an autophagy-dependent manner into functional niche cells in the host that include mesenchymal stromal cells and endothelial cells, previously regarded as "nonhematopoietic" sources. Our findings thus identify young donor HSCs as a primary parental source of the niche, thereby suggesting a clinical solution to revitalizing aged or damaged bone marrow hematopoietic niche.

Impact of Donor Age in Haploidentical-Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus Matched Unrelated Donor Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is associated with inferior overall survival (OS) compared to HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT with PTCy prophylaxis in patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). Given prognostic implications of donor age, we investigated the differences in outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; n = 775) undergoing RIC-HCT with a younger MUD (age <35 years; n = 84) versus a younger haploidentical donor (age <35 years; n = 302) versus an older haploidentical donor (age ≥35 years; n = 389). The older MUD group was excluded from the analysis because of small numbers. The younger haploidentical donor group (median age, 59.5 years) was somewhat younger than the younger MUD group (median age, 66.8 years) and the older haploidentical donor group (median age, 64.7 years). More patients in the MUD group received peripheral blood grafts (82%) compared to the haploidentical donor groups (55% to 56%). In multivariate analysis, compared to the younger MUD group, the younger haploidentical donor group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 3.12; P = .005) and the older haploidentical donor group (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.71; P < .001) had a significantly inferior OS, and the younger haploidentical donor group (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.39 to 9.93; P = .009) and older haploidentical donor group (HR, 6.91; 95% CI, 2.75 to 17.39; P < .001) had a significantly higher risk of nonrelapse mortality. The older haploidentical group had a significantly higher risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.38 to 3.80; P = .001) and grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.09 to 6.71; P = .03). There were no significant differences across the groups in the incidence of chronic GVHD or relapse. Among adult AML patients in CR undergoing RIC-HCT with PTCy prophylaxis, a young MUD may be preferred over a young haploidentical donor.

Donor Selection for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

In Germany, each year over 3000 patients with malignant and non-malignant hematologic and systemic diseases are treated by allo - geneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Genetic donor-recipient disparities, especially those concerning variable human leukocyte antigens (HLA), mediate both an immunotherapeutic effect and the risk of damage to healthy tissues ("graft-versus-host disease"). The adoption of evidencebased strategies for donor selection has been crucial for the continuous improvement of survival rates after allogeneic HCT, with over 50% of patients transplanted for standard indications-such as early-stage acute myeloid leukemia-alive at three years post-transplant.

METHODS

The PubMed database was selectively searched for literature on immunogenetic and clinical factors relevant to allogeneic HCT, as part of the process of establishing a German consensus statement on HCT donor selection.

RESULTS

The most important factor in donor selection is a match for the five major HLA loci (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, -DQ), either in genetically HLAidentical siblings or in unrelated but fully HLA-compatible donors from international registries. Additional selection criteria for the latter include com - patibility for the HLA-DP locus, donor age and sex, cytomegalovirus serostatus, and blood group. Related donors identical for only 50% of the HLA genes (haploidentical donors) as well as unrelated donors with a single HLA mismatch are both valid alternatives although they are associated with an up to 10% higher risk of mortality.

CONCLUSION

The refinement of donor selection strategies has been instrumental for the continuous improvement of patient survival rates after allogeneic HCT witnessed over the past decades. An interdisciplinary approach to donor selection based on up-to-date scientific evidence is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Old age: the crown of life, our play's last act. Question and answers on older patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several studies showed that age alone should not be used as an arbitrary parameter to exclude patients from allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The accessibility to allogeneic HCT programs for older patients with hematological diseases is growing up constantly. The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research has recently shown that over 30% of allogeneic HCT recipients are at least 60 years old and that nearly 4% are aged 70 or more. Historically, the use of allogeneic HCT among elderly patients has been limited by age restrictions, reflecting physicians' concerns regarding prohibitive transplant-related mortality and HCT-associated morbidity.

RECENT FINDINGS

The introduction of reduced intensity/toxicity conditioning regimens has allowed transplant Centers to carry out allogeneic HCT on patients previously considered not ideal candidates. The integration of specific risk scores could lead to better capture mental and physical frailties of older patients. Older adults less frequently have available medically fit siblings, able to donate, so, unrelated donors, familial haploidentical donors or umbilical cord blood grafts could potentially abrogate such a difficulty, allowing the curative potential of allogeneic HCT.

SUMMARY

The appropriate assessing of allogeneic HCT feasibility for elderly patients should be the resonate application of different clinical and biological principles.

Hematology 2022-what is complete HLA match in 2022?

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) often represents the only curative treatment for various malignant and nonmalignant disorders. Initially, the only suitable donors were considered human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched or partially matched relatives. The founding of international unrelated donor and umbilical cord blood registries expanded unrelated donor options and access for patients. In the absence of a matched sibling donor (MSD) with 13% to 51% availability, the current consensus recommends use of a matched unrelated donor (MUD) at HLA-A, B, C, and DRB1 with consideration of matching at HLA-DPB1 and -DQB1. MUD donor availability (donor willing and available to donate) ranges from 29% to 78% with African American patients on the lower end and white non-Hispanic patients with the highest likelihood of a match. Recent studies comparing donor to no-donor treatment options in malignant disease consistently point to substantially better outcomes following alloHCT. In the absence of an MSD or MUD, alternative donor choices turn to haploidentical related (Haplo), mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD), and umbilical cord blood (UCB). Novel strategies for alloHCT, including the use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based graft vs host disease prophylaxis, have expanded the safety and effectiveness of transplant procedures across HLA barriers using Haplo and MMUD. The less restrictive matching requirements for UCB transplant are well documented and allow for transplant across multiply mismatched HLA alleles. When all donor options are considered, nearly all patients have an available donor. Here we discuss the likelihood of donor availability, complete HLA match by available donor type, and current controversies warranting future research.

Allogeneic transplantation for advanced acute leukemia

Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with advanced acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) remain uncertain. All published series include the important and often not stated selection bias that influences outcome. Performance status, patient age, prompt donor availability, risk phenotype of the leukemia, and tumor burden all influence the decision-making process about HCT with active disease. In addition, patients with MDS do not achieve a true pre-HCT complete remission, and thus much less stringent measures are used to indicate suitability for allografting in that disease. Post-HCT maintenance or investigational approaches for tumor depletion may improve the outcomes.

Current donor selection strategies for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Since the first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) was performed by Dr. E. Donnall Thomas in 1957, the field has advanced with new stem cell sources, immune suppressive regimens, and transplant protocols. Stem cells may be collected from bone marrow, peripheral or cord blood from an identical twin, a sibling, or a related or unrelated donor, which can be human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched, mismatched, or haploidentical. Although HLA matching is one of the most important criteria for successful allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) to minimize graft vs host disease (GVHD), prevent relapse, and improve overall survival, the novel immunosuppressive protocols for GVHD prophylaxis offered improved outcomes in haploidentical HCT (haplo-HCT), expanding donor availability for the majority of HCT candidates. These immunosuppressive protocols are currently being tested with the HLA-matched and mismatched donors to improve HCT outcomes further. In addition, fine-tuning the DPB1 mismatching and discovering the B leader genotype and mismatching may offer further optimization of donor selection and transplant outcomes. While the decision about a donor type largely depends on the patient's characteristics, disease status, and the transplant protocols utilized by an individual transplant center, there are general approaches to donor selection dictated by donor-recipient histocompatibility and the urgency for HCT. This review highlights recent advances in understanding critical factors in donor selection strategies for allo-HCT. It uses clinical vignettes to demonstrate the importance of making timely decisions for HCT candidates.

Donor Age and Non-Relapse Mortality: Study of Their Association after HLA-Matched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

The purpose of this retrospective study was to study the correlation between donor age (DA) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse incidence (RI) among patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (aHCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in a single Canadian center. Data from 125 consecutive patients transplanted with a matched related or unrelated donor between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed using multivariable models. After a median follow-up of 2.8 years, the cumulative incidences of NRM and relapse were 19% and 35% at 5 years. Despite being independently associated with NRM and relapse-free survival (RFS), DA was not associated with RI. The independent determinants of NRM in addition to DA were patient age and hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI), independently of donor kinship. The effect of DA on NRM was found to be significantly increased over the age of 50 years. DA was not associated with incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) but showed an association with the occurrence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD). In conclusion, younger donors should be favored to limit NRM and increase RFS in HLA-matched aHCT. The etiological mechanisms behind the association of DA with higher NRM remain to be elucidated.

Pretransplant Systemic Lipidomic Profiles in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Simple Summary

Stem cell transplantation is used in the treatment of aggressive hematological malignancies and consists of initial high-dose and potentially lethal chemotherapy, followed by rescue with the transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Transplantation with stem cells from a healthy donor (i.e., allogeneic stem cells) has the strongest anti-cancer effect, but also the highest risk of severe toxicity. Furthermore, the clinical status at the time of transplantation (inflammation, fluid overload) is associated with posttransplant mortality, and immune-mediated acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a potential lethal complication. Finally, lipid metabolism regulates the proliferation and survival of both malignant hematological cells and immunocompetent cells that cause GVHD. Our study shows that the pretransplant lipid profiles differ between allotransplant recipients and can be used for the subclassification of patients and possibly to identify patients with an increased risk of death due to disease relapse or treatment toxicity. The therapeutic targeting of lipid metabolism should therefore be further explored in these transplant recipients.

Abstract

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is used in the treatment of high-risk hematological malignancies. However, this treatment is associated with severe treatment-related morbidity and mortality. The metabolic status of the recipient may be associated with the risk of development of transplant-associated complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). To better understand the impact of the lipidomic profile of transplant recipients on posttransplant complications, we evaluated the lipid signatures of patients with hematological disease using non-targeted lipidomics. In the present study, we studied pretransplant serum samples derived from 92 consecutive patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A total of 960 lipid biochemicals were identified, and the pretransplant lipidomic profiles differed significantly when comparing patients with and without the risk factors: (i) pretransplant inflammation, (ii) early fluid overload, and (iii) patients with and without later steroid-requiring acute GVHD. All three factors, but especially patients with pretransplant inflammation, were associated with decreased levels of several lipid metabolites. Based on the overall concentrations of various lipid subclasses, we identified a patient subset characterized by low lipid levels, increased frequency of MDS patients, signs of inflammation, decreased body mass index, and an increased risk of early non-relapse mortality. Metabolic targeting has been proposed as a possible therapeutic strategy in allotransplant recipients, and our present results suggest that the clinical consequences of therapeutic intervention (e.g., nutritional support) will also differ between patients and depend on the metabolic context.

HLA-Matching with PTCy: A Reanalysis of a CIBMTR Dataset with Propensity Score Matching and Donor Age

A reanalysis including donor age and using propensity score matching shows no major differences in survival or relapse.

Data sharing and collaborative reanalysis enhance our recognition of the nuances of complex statistical methodologies and published results.

Blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) outcomes using haploidentical donors (Haplo) and posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis compare favorably to HLA-matched donors using calcineurin inhibitor–based prophylaxis. A recent Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research analysis of patients receiving homogenous PTCy-based prophylaxis found that, with reduced intensity conditioning, Haplo BMTs had worse outcomes than matched unrelated donor (MUD) BMTs. Due to significant differences between groups, we reanalyzed the dataset using propensity score matching and, additionally, added a donor age variable. After matching MUD BMTs to Haplo BMTs in a 1:5 ratio, no significant differences were found between groups across all measured baseline characteristics. Outcomes analyses demonstrated no significant differences in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] of mortality with MUD vs Haplo [95% confidence interval], 0.95 [0.65-1.16], P = .75), disease-free survival (HR of relapse or death, 0.98 [0.73-1.18], P = .89), relapse rate (HR, 1.06 [0.77-1.38], P = .69), or nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (HR, 0.85 [0.42-1.13], P = .49) between groups. After stratification by conditioning intensity, MUD BMTs in the reduced-intensity cohort had lower risk of NRM (HR, 0.56 [0.14-0.99], P = .05), with no significant difference in other clinical outcomes. These results suggest the effect of HLA matching on BMT outcomes with PTCy is less meaningful than previously reported. Timely identification of a young, at least half-matched (related or unrelated) donor may be more important than finding a fully matched donor if the latter leads to a delay in BMT or use of an older donor.

Haploidentical vs Matched Unrelated vs Matched Sibling Donor HCT with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide

With the use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), the outcomes of mismatched related donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are now approaching those of matched donor HCT. Here we compared haploidentical donor HCT versus HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT and HLA-identical sibling donor (MSD) HCT in a cohort in which all patients received PTCy for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We included 661 patients (275 haploidentical, 246 MUD, and 140 MSD HCT). The most common diagnoses were acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. In multivariate analysis, the haploidentical group was found to have significantly higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2 to 4.9; P < .001) and inferior progression-free survival (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.4; P < .001) and overall survival (OS; HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 3; P < .001) compared with the MUD group. Relapse was the most common cause of death in all groups. Among causes of NRM, the haploidentical group had more infection-related deaths and fewer GVHD-related deaths than the other groups. The haploidentical group also had a higher risk of viral and fungal infections, grade ≥3 hemorrhagic cystitis, and cardiovascular toxicities and slower reconstitution of CD4, CD8, and regulatory T cells but faster reconstitution of natural killer cells. In an exploratory analysis, older patients with older donors (>50 years for both) appeared to have particularly high NRM and lower OS in the haploidentical group compared with the other groups. Our data suggest that even with the use of PTCy, the outcomes of haploidentical HCT are inferior to those of HLA-matched donor HCT.