Cochrane Reviews Regarding Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgical Techniques -Validity of Conclusions May Be Limited by Incomplete Evidence

Alternatives to Topical Glaucoma Medication for Glaucoma Management

Topical glaucoma medications have favorable safety and efficacy, but their use is limited by factors such as side effects, nonadherence, costs, ocular surface disease, intraocular pressure fluctuations, diminished quality of life, and the inherent difficulty of penetrating the corneal surface. Although traditionally these limitations have been accepted as an inevitable part of glaucoma treatment, a rapidly-evolving arena of minimally invasive surgical and laser interventions has initiated the beginnings of a reevaluation of the glaucoma treatment paradigm. This reevaluation encompasses an overall shift away from the reactive, topical-medication-first default and a shift toward earlier intervention with laser or surgical therapies such as selective laser trabeculoplasty, sustained-release drug delivery, and micro-invasive glaucoma surgery. Aside from favorable safety, these interventions may have clinically important attributes such as consistent IOP control, cost-effectiveness, independence from patient adherence, prevention of disease progression, and improved quality of life.

Microinvasive glaucoma surgeries: critical summary of clinical trial data with and without phacoemulsification

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To critically summarize and examine published data from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the safety and efficacy of microinvasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) with and without cataract surgery versus cataract surgery alone.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three RCTs with standardized outcomes and rigorous methodology demonstrate superiority of the iStent (Glaukos), CyPass (Alcon), and Hydrus (Alcon) MIGS devices in combination with cataract surgery versus cataract surgery alone. The trials all involved medication washouts at baseline and also after 24 months of follow-up. In each of the trials, a greater proportion of participants randomized to the combined MIGS procedures achieved at least 20% unmedicated intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering compared with cataract surgery alone. With the exception of the CyPass device, which has been voluntarily withdrawn from the market, adverse events associated with MIGS were acceptable and consistent with routine intraocular surgeries. Follow-up studies demonstrate sustained efficacy, greater probabilities of visual field preservation, increased cost-effectiveness, and enhanced quality of life associated with MIGS procedures.

SUMMARY

Data related to MIGS platforms for treatment of open-angle glaucoma with or without co-existing cataract supports their continued adoption in clinical practice. Future studies comparing various techniques and devices in a standardized fashion are needed.