Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality of Accommodative, Multifocal, Extended Depth-of-Focus, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in Presbyopia-Correcting Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

Clinical performance after implantation of an EDOF intraocular lens in the dominant eye and a presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens in the nondominant eye

PURPOSE

To evaluate subjective and objective outcomes after combined implantation of an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) and a combined technology multifocal lens (CT-IOL).

SETTING

2 clinical practices (Carolina Eyecare Physicians, Center For Sight) in the United States.

DESIGN

Prospective, unmasked, multicenter, nonrandomized bilateral eye study.

METHODS

Patients interested in reducing their dependence on spectacles were implanted with an EDOF IOL in the dominant eye and a CT-IOL in the nondominant eye. Refractive and visual acuity (VA) data at various distances (4 m, 66 cm, 40 cm, and 33 cm) were collected 3 months postsurgery, along with the distance-corrected binocular defocus curve and responses to questionnaires related to spectacle independence, visual disturbances, and overall visual function.

RESULTS

Data from 37 participants were analyzed. The distance-corrected binocular defocus curve showed a mean VA better than 0.1 logMAR (20/25) at all vergences from +1.00 to -2.50 diopters (D). 36 participants (97%) had an uncorrected binocular VA of 0.3 logMAR or better, at all test distances. 70% of participants (26/37) reported never wearing spectacles at any distance, and 84% (31/37) were "completely" or "mostly" satisfied with their overall vision after surgery. Halos were the disturbance reported most frequently and reported as most bothersome, with difficulty driving at night the most common visual function issue. Difficulty reading was the next most reported issue. Overall eyesight was rated as "excellent" or "good" by 92% (34/37) of participants.

CONCLUSIONS

This combined EDOF/CT-IOL approach was well-tolerated by participants and provided some potential benefits relative to bilateral implantation of either lens.

Outcomes of Corneal Compound Myopic Astigmatism with Presbyopia by Zeiss PRESBYOND® Laser Blended Vision LASIK Using Default CRS-Master® Target Refractions for Reduced Anisometropia

Background/Objectives: Presbyopia, a common age-related refractive error, affects over a billion people globally and significantly impacts daily life. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 288 eyes of 144 patients undergoing LBV PRESBYOND® treatment for myopic presbyopia with astigmatism, aiming to evaluate precision, efficacy, safety, and stability over six months. Results: Key findings include high efficacy, with 99% of distance-eyes achieving uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/25 or better, and 85% of near-eyes achieving UDVA of 20/32 or better. The results show excellent refractive outcomes, with 99% of long-sighted eyes and 97% of near-sighted eyes having a postoperative spherical equivalent within ±1.00 D. Safety was demonstrated by no loss of two or more Snellen lines after treatment, with 94% of patients maintaining corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) before and after surgery. Conclusions: Overall, LBV PRESBYOND® proved effective, safe, and well tolerated for myopic presbyopia correction, offering satisfactory visual outcomes and potential spectacle independence for various distances. This study underscores the importance of individualized treatment based on patient age, highlighting the positive impact of binocular summation on visual function. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting LBV PRESBYOND® as a viable option for addressing presbyopic myopia, offering insights into its efficacy and safety profile. Further research could explore postoperative stereopsis and long-term outcomes to enhance understanding and refine treatment protocols.

Refractive and Visual Outcomes Using a Trifocal, Diffractive, Hydrophobic Intraocular Lens in Japanese Eyes

Purpose

To report the refractive and visual outcomes after implantation of a trifocal, diffractive, hydrophobic intraocular lens (IOL) in Japanese eyes following cataract surgery.

Methods

A total of 45 eyes implanted with FineVision HP IOLs (Beaver-Visitec International, Inc. USA) were enrolled in this retrospective study. The clinical outcomes assessed after 3-months were refraction and monocular logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) at 80 and 66 cm, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) at 40 cm.

Results

97.78% of the eyes were within ±0.50D of spherical equivalent and all of them were within ±1.00D (mean: -0.00±0.22 D, with 75.56% within ±0.13D), while 91.11% of the eyes had ≤0.50D residual astigmatism and all of them had ≤1.00D (mean: -0.08±0.24D, with 88.89% ≤0.25D). UDVA and CDVA showed mean values of -0.05±0.07 logMAR and -0.07±0.06 logMAR, respectively. 86.67% and 95.56% of the eyes had ≥20/20 UDVA and CDVA, respectively, with 100% achieving ≥20/25 for both UDVA and CDVA. At 80 cm, the mean monocular logMAR UIVA and DCIVA were 0.18±0.14 and 0.14±0.14, and at 66 cm the values were 0.20±0.15 and 0.19±0.15, respectively. At 80 cm 20% of the eyes had ≥20/25 DCIVA and 60% had ≥20/32 DCIVA. These values changed to 15.56% and 40% of the eyes at 66 cm. In terms of near vision, the mean monocular logMAR UNVA and DCNVA were 0.04±0.10 and 0.03±0.10, respectively. 53.33% of the eyes had ≥20/20 UNVA and DCNVA, with 86.67% achieving ≥20/25 UNVA and DCNVA.

Conclusion

The FineVision HP trifocal diffractive IOL provided accurate refractive outcomes with good visual acuity at different distances in Japanese eyes.

Comparative efficacy and safety of all kinds of intraocular lenses in presbyopia-correcting cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near).

CONCLUSIONS

For cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.

BCLA CLEAR Presbyopia: Epidemiology and impact

The global all-ages prevalence of epidemiologically-measured 'functional' presbyopia was estimated at 24.9% in 2015, affecting 1.8 billion people. This prevalence was projected to stabilise at 24.1% in 2030 due to increasing myopia, but to affect more people (2.1 billion) due to population dynamics. Factors affecting the prevalence of presbyopia include age, geographic location, urban versus rural location, sex, and, to a lesser extent, socioeconomic status, literacy and education, health literacy and inequality. Risk factors for early onset of presbyopia included environmental factors, nutrition, near demands, refractive error, accommodative dysfunction, medications, certain health conditions and sleep. Presbyopia was found to impact on quality-of-life, in particular quality of vision, labour force participation, work productivity and financial burden, mental health, social wellbeing and physical health. Current understanding makes it clear that presbyopia is a very common age-related condition that has significant impacts on both patient-reported outcome measures and economics. However, there are complexities in defining presbyopia for epidemiological and impact studies. Standardisation of definitions will assist future synthesis, pattern analysis and sense-making between studies.

Visual and Refractive Outcomes of a New Hydrophobic Trifocal Toric Intraocular Lens

Purpose

To evaluate the visual outcomes and efficacy of astigmatism correction using a new hydrophobic trifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods

This study involved 62 eyes implanted with the FineVision HP Toric IOL. The visual and refractive outcomes were assessed preoperatively and 6 weeks after the surgery. Specifically, monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 80 and 60 cm and uncorrected near visual acuity at (UNVA) at 40 cm were evaluated. The rotational stability of the lens was also assessed.

Results

Sixty-one eyes (98.39%) were within ±1.00D and 55 eyes (88.71%) were within ±0.50 D of spherical equivalent, with a mean value of 0.09±0.39 D. 51 (82.26%) and 61 (98.39%) eyes had a UDVA of ≥20/20 and ≥20/25, respectively, and for CDVA these values were as follows: 59 (95.16%) and 62 eyes (100%), respectively. The mean UDVA and CDVA were 0.01±0.06 and -0.01±0.04logMAR, respectively. Greater than or equal to unaided 20/20 vision was achieved at 40 cm in 42 (67.74%), UIVA at 60 cm in 42 (67.74%) and 50 eyes (80.65%) at 80 cm. Those achieving ≥20/25 were 56 (90.32%, 40 cm), 59 (95.16%, 60 cm), and 62 eyes (100%, 80 cm). Postoperative mean values were 0.04±0.07, 0.03±0.07, and 0.00±0.07logMAR for UCNVA, UIVA at 60 cm, and UIVA at 80 cm, respectively. The mean rotation of the IOL was 5.8 degrees.

Conclusion

This hydrophobic trifocal toric IOL provides good refractive outcomes with excellent visual acuity across multiple distances, providing a full range of focus.

Customizing Clinical Outcomes with Implantation of Two Diffractive Trifocal IOLs of Identical Design but Differing Light Distributions to the Far, Intermediate and Near Foci

Purpose

To evaluate clinical outcomes after bilateral or contralateral implantation of the Gemetric™ (G) and Gemetric™ Plus (GPlus) diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, multi-center open-label study comparing clinical results and subjective patient responses around 6 months after implantation of the study lenses (toric and non-toric) in three different groups (bilateral G, bilateral GPlus and contralateral G/GPlus implantation). Results included the manifest refraction, uncorrected and distance corrected monocular and binocular visual acuity (VA) at distance, intermediate and near; the defocus curve; contrast sensitivity; and patient reported outcomes regarding spectacle independence, satisfaction and visual disturbances.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in the mean refraction spherical equivalent between the two lens models (p = 0.33) or between the toric and non-toric lenses (p = 0.06). Monocular VA was better at distance with the G lens and better at near with the GPlus lens (p < 0.01). Mean binocular VA was better than 0.1 logMAR at all distances for all groups, both uncorrected and distance corrected. The mean binocular distance corrected VA was better than 0.15 logMAR from 0.0 D to -3.50 D for all groups. All VA data for the contralateral group was as good or better than for the bilateral GPlus group. Questionnaire results showed no difference between groups for the frequency, severity, or degree of bother of visual disturbances (p > 0.24).

Conclusion

The two diffractive trifocal IOLs studied here may be used either bilaterally or contralaterally for the correction of presbyopia in cataract patients, providing excellent visual acuity with low levels of visual disturbances and high rates of overall spectacle independence. Bilateral Gemetric implantation resulted in slightly better distance and intermediate vision while contralateral implantation provided slightly better near vision. There was no apparent advantage to implanting the GPlus IOL bilaterally.

Functional Classification of Intraocular Lenses Based on Defocus Curves: A Scoping Review and Cluster Analysis

PURPOSE

To explore a potential functional classification of intraocular lenses (IOLs) based on monocular visual acuity defocus curves (VADCs) as a primary end-point.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed. Two independent reviewers screened the literature for inclusion and data extraction. Inclusion criteria were full-text primary clinical studies of IOLs, published in English from 2010 onward, involving patients undergoing cataract or refractive lens exchange. A cluster analysis was conducted to explore similarities in the range of field (RoF) and increase of visual acuity from intermediate to near (ΔVA).

RESULTS

A total of 107 studies were ultimately included from the 436 identified in the systematic search, with an additional 5 studies added through the snowballing technique search. The cluster analysis was conducted using 69 reports that included monocular VADCs. Two main categories were identified based on the achieved RoF for 0.2 and 0.3 logMAR: full (FRoF) and partial (PRoF) RoF IOLs. Three subcategories were identified for FRoF depending on ΔVA: continuous (FRoF-C), smooth (FRoF-Sm), and steep (FRoF-St). On the other hand, PRoF IOLs shared the characteristic of monotonous decrease in visual acuity and were subclassified into two subcategories depending on the achieved RoF: narrowed (PRoF-N) and extended (PRoF-Ex). An additional subcategory was added to PRoF, enhanced (PRoF-En), for 7 reports alternating between PRoF-N and PRoF-Ex depending on the use of 0.2 or 0.3 logMAR as a cut-off for calculating the RoF.

CONCLUSIONS

IOLs can be functionally classified into six types depending on the RoF and shape of the monocular VADC. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(2):e108-e116.].

Long-term Clinical Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of Two Trifocal Diffractive IOLs

PURPOSE

To show clinical outcomes after bilateral implantation of either a hydrophobic FineVision POD F GF or a hydro-philic FineVision POD F intraocular lens (IOL) (Beaver-Visitec International, Inc).

METHODS

A total of 110 patients with cataract were randomized to receive either POD F GF or POD F IOLs and followed up for 2 years. The measurements included refraction, monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected distance (UDVA and CDVA), intermediate (UIVA and DCIVA), and near (UNVA and DCNVA) visual acuities, defocus curve, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, photic phenomena, and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean spherical equivalent was similar in both groups and stable across visits (< 0.25 diopters [D]). At 2 years, 81.8% and 90.5% of eyes were within ±0.50 D in the POD F GF and POD F IOL groups, respectively (100% for ±1.00 D in both groups). At 2 years, 100% and 90.5% of the patients presented a binocular CDVA of 20/25 or better; 93.9% and 85.7% of patients a DCIVA of 20/25 or better and 87.5% and 70% of patients a DCNVA of 20/25 or better, for the POD F GF and POD F IOL groups, respectively. The defocus curve showed continuous visual acuity, being 20/32 or better in both groups over a 4.50 D range. Both groups presented good contrast sensitivity for photopic and mesopic conditions, and the size and intensity of halo and glare phenomena were similar between the two. Both groups also included a high percentage of patients who reported that they had stopped wearing glasses and greater than 80% satisfaction and recommendation levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed comparable long-term visual and refractive outcomes of both IOL models after cataract surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(12):798-807.].

Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision

Purpose

To evaluate relative visual performance and subjective outcomes after implantation of the TECNIS Eyhance™ intraocular lens (IOL) targeted for bilateral emmetropia or monovision.

Methods

This was a prospective, single-center randomized, patient-masked trial. Patients were implanted with the enhanced IOL targeted for bilateral emmetropia or slight monovision (-0.75 D in the non-dominant eye). At 3 months the binocular visual acuity (VA) was measured at distance, intermediate and near, along with low contrast VA in photopic and mesopic conditions, and the distance corrected defocus curve. Questionnaires related to spectacle independence, satisfaction, visual symptoms, and functional vision were administered.

Results

Data from 71 subjects (34 Emmetropia, 37 Monovision) were analyzed. There was no difference in the mean uncorrected distance VA (p = 0.11), but uncorrected intermediate and near VAs were one line better in the Monovision group (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Mesopic and photopic low contrast VA were similar between groups. There was a trend for less difficulty and higher satisfaction with near and intermediate vision in the Monovision group, but no significant differences in any of the subjective questionnaires. Difficulty reading was the most reported concern in both groups, though 93% of all subjects reported "little" or "no" difficulty with daily activities. Overall, 82% of subjects were "completely" or "very" happy with their lens choice.

Conclusion

Using this enhanced IOL with slight monovision in the non-dominant eye increased intermediate and near VA with no apparent effect on low contrast distance VA, subjective visual quality, or satisfaction.

Clinical outcomes in eyes with diffractive continuous depth-of-focus intraocular lenses enhanced for near vision: comparison with trifocal intraocular lenses

BACKGROUND

To prospectively evaluate visual functions and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of diffractive continuous depth-of-focus intraocular lens (CDF IOL) compared with trifocal IOLs.

METHODS

This investigator-initiated study was approved by a certified local review board (registered: jRCTs032210305). CDF IOL (Synergy, J&J, group S) and trifocal IOL (AcrySof PanOptix, Alcon, group P) were implanted bilaterally in 30 patients each. Three months postoperatively, binocular outcomes of uncorrected (BUCVA) and distance-corrected (BDCVA) visual acuities at distances of 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, and 5 m were measured. Contrast sensitivities were binocularly measured using CSV-1000 (2.5 m) and Pelli-Robson charts at distances of 0.4 and 1 m. Symptoms of glare, halo, starburst, and waxy vision, and satisfaction for near, intermediate, and far visions were assessed with questionnaires. Differences between the two groups were examined.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients each completed the follow-up. The mean age of the group S was lower than that of the group P (P < 0.001). The BUCVA at 0.4 m was better in the S group, while the mean manifest refraction of the P group showed a significant hyperopic shift (P < 0.001). BDCVA was significantly better in the S group. The contrast sensitivity results at three distances showed no discernible differences. Although more patients in the S group reported significant glare and halo, their satisfaction with near vision was higher.

CONCLUSIONS

The binocular visual function of patients with CDF IOLs was comparable to or better than that of patients with trifocal IOLs. The patients were satisfied with near vision, despite the enhanced glare and halo. Understanding the differences between the two types of presbyopia-correcting IOLs is important to ensure patient satisfaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This clinical trial was registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Research (identifier: jRCTs032210305) on September 13, 2021.

Clinical Performance of a New Trifocal IOL with a 7.0 mm Optical Zone

Purpose

To evaluate the refractive and visual outcomes following cataract surgery and implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with a 7.0 mm optical zone.

Methods

A total of 23 patients who underwent bilateral implantation with the Triva-aXAY IOL were analyzed at 6 months post-surgery. The main outcome measures were refractive error, monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected and corrected-distance intermediate visual acuity (UIVA, CDIVA) at 60 cm, uncorrected and corrected-distance near visual acuity (UNVA, CDNVA) at 40 cm, and binocular defocus curve. Patients also completed the Catquest-9SF questionnaire.

Results

All eyes were within ±1.00D, and 91.30% of eyes within ±0.50D, with a mean postoperative spherical equivalent of -0.14±0.29D. Similarly, 95.65% of patients showed a binocular UDVA ≥20/25, compared to 100% for CDVA, and the mean binocular UDVA and CDVA were 0.02±0.06 and 0.00±0.05 logMAR, respectively. At intermediate vision, 65.22% of patients showed a binocular UIVA ≥20/25, compared to 86.96% for CDIVA, and the mean binocular UIVA and CDIVA were 0.07±0.06 and 0.06±0.06 logMAR, respectively. At near, 95.65% of patients showed a binocular UNVA and CDNVA ≥20/25, with a mean binocular UDNVA and CDNVA of 0.04±0.07 and 0.02±0.05 logMAR, respectively. Finally, 95.65% of patients reported being quite satisfied to very satisfied with their vision and about 74% did not report any difficulty with their vision in their everyday life. Between 65.22% and 100% of patients reported no difficulty performing different tasks.

Conclusion

Our study shows good visual and refractive outcomes with high satisfaction in patients implanted with the Triva-aXAY IOL with a 7.0 mm optical zone.

Tear Film Stability Affects Visual Acuity After Implantations of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses: An Evaluation by Objective Scatter Index

Purpose

To assess the impact of tear film on postoperative visual acuity after cataract surgery to implant an intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods

Tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I test, objective scatter index (OSI), and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA), and near visual acuity (UCNVA) were collected 6 months after cataract surgery.

Results

Fifteen eyes with monofocal (Mo-) IOLs and 15 eyes with multifocal (Mu-) IOLs from 30 subjects were included. The Mu-IOL group exhibited higher baseline OSI (1.92 ± 0.69, P < 0.001). Negative correlations-both groups: tear film-related OSI (TF-OSI) and TBUT/Schirmer I test; Mo-IOL: TBUT and logMAR UCDVA-and positive correlations-both groups: TF-OSI and baseline OSI, baseline OSI/TF-OSI and logMAR UCDVA; Mu-IOL: baseline OSI/TF-OSI and logMAR UCIVA/UCNVA-were found. Linear regression showed associations between TF-OSI and TBUT (Mo-IOL: R2 = 0.455, P = 0.006; Mu-IOL: R2 = 0.454, P = 0.006)/Schirmer I test (Mo-IOL: R2 = 0.527, P = 0.002; Mu-IOL: R2 = 0.266, P = 0.049). Multiple regression showed associations between baseline OSI (Mo-IOL: R2 = 0.309, P = 0.032; Mu-IOL: R2 = 0.305, P = 0.033)/TF-OSI (Mo-IOL: R2 = 0.332, P = 0.025; Mu-IOL: R2 = 0.523, P = 0.002)/TBUT (Mo-IOL only: R2 = 0.315, P = 0.029) and logMAR UCDVA.

Conclusions

TF-OSI reflects the UCDVA performance in eyes with IOLs and facilitates a better understanding of the effects of the tear film.

Translational Relevance

TF-OSI offers a developmental and objective approach to assessing the changing visual performance caused by tear film after cataract surgery and IOL implantation in clinical practices.

Visual Outcomes, Quality of Vision, Patient Satisfaction and Spectacle Independence After Bilateral Implantation of the Synergy™ Intraocular Lens

Purpose

To evaluate vision, visual quality, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence after bilateral implantation of the TECNIS Synergy™ intraocular lens.

Setting

Two clinical practices in the USA.

Design

Ambispective unmasked non-randomized clinical trial.

Methods

Patients with a history of uneventful bilateral femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery with the study IOL implanted, targeted for emmetropia, at least 3 months prior to the study visit were enrolled. Monocular and binocular visual acuity (VA) were measured at distance, intermediate and near, along with binocular mesopic VA. Low contrast binocular VA and reading speed in mesopic and photopic conditions were also measured. Patient satisfaction, spectacle independence, visual symptoms, and functional vision questionnaires were completed.

Results

Results from 52 subjects were available for analysis. Mean binocular unaided visual acuity was ~0.1 logMAR (20/20) from distance to 33 cm, with 81% of subjects having 0.2 logMAR (20/25) vision or better at all test distances and 92% reporting never needing glasses at any distance. Average reading speed at 40 cm was only 10 words/minute slower in dim light (p = 0.03). Mesopic and low contrast acuity appeared good. Halos were the most frequent and bothersome visual disturbances, with the greatest effect on driving at night. Eighty-eight percent of subjects reported being "completely" or "mostly" satisfied with their overall unaided vision.

Conclusion

This hybrid technology IOL provided a range of binocular visual acuity from distance to 33 cm and good functional vision, even in dim light. Patients should be advised of the likelihood of visual disturbances, particularly halos.

Cataract Surgery-Indications, Techniques, and Intraocular Lens Selection

BACKGROUND

Opacification of the lens of the eye (cataract) is usually due to aging. It is a painless, progressive condition that affects contrast and color perception and alters refraction, leading to visual loss that may be total. In cataract surgery, the turbid lens is replaced by an artificial lens. An estimated 600 000 to 800 000 such procedures are performed in Germany each year.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, including meta-analyses, Cochrane reviews, and randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

Cataract is the most common reversible cause of blindness around the world (approximately 95 million people). The surgical replacement of a turbid lens with an artificial lens is usually carried out under local anesthesia. The standard technique for fragmentation of the nucleus of the lens is ultrasonic phacoemulsification. RCTs have not shown the superiority of the femtosecond laser over phacoemulsification for this purpose so far. The spectrum of artificial intraocular lenses, aside from the conventional type with a single focus, include lenses with multiple foci, extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) lenses, and astigmatism-correcting lenses.

CONCLUSION

In Germany, cataract surgery is usually performed on an outpatient basis under local anesthesia. Artificial lenses with various additional functions are available nowadays; the choice of lens depends on the needs of the individual patient. Patients must be adequately informed about the advantages and disadvantages of the different lens systems.

Evaluating Changes in Apparent Chord Mu after Pharmacological Pupil Dilatation

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative measurements of apparent chord mu length above 0.6 mm have been associated with higher risks for photic phenomena after cataract surgery with multifocal intraocular lenses (MFIOLs).

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated patients scheduled for elective cataract surgery at a single tertiary medical center between 2021 and 2022. Pupil diameter and apparent chord mu length were analyzed for eyes with biometry measurements from IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, AG) under photopic light conditions, before and after pharmacological pupil dilatation. Exclusion criteria were visual acuity worse than 20/100, prior intraocular surgery, refractive surgery, iris-related procedures, or pupil abnormalities affecting dilatation. Apparent chord mu lengths before and after pupil dilatation were compared. In addition, multivariate linear regression analysis, using a stepwise method, was conducted to assess possible predictors of apparent chord values.

RESULTS

Included were 87 eyes of 87 patients. Mean chord mu length increased after pupillary dilatation from 0.32 ± 0.17 mm to 0.41 ± 0.17 mm for right eyes (p < 0.001) and from 0.29 ± 0.16 mm to 0.40 ± 0.22 mm for left eyes (p < 0.001). Seven eyes (8.0%) had an apparent chord mu of 0.6 mm and above pre-dilatation. Fourteen eyes (16.1%) with an apparent chord mu under 0.6 mm pre-dilatation had apparent chord mu of 0.6 mm or above post-dilatation.

CONCLUSION

Apparent chord mu length significantly increases after pharmacological pupillary dilatation. Pupil size and dilatation status should always be considered during patient selection for a planned MFIOL using apparent chord mu length as a reference marker.

Long Term Clinical Outcomes of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Versions of a Trifocal IOL with the Same Optical Design

Purpose

To show the visual and refractive outcomes in Asian eyes with cataract when bilaterally implanted with either a hydrophobic FineVision POD F GF or a hydrophilic FineVision POD F intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods

Forty-six patients were randomized to receive POD F GF or POD F IOLs. Visual and refractive outcomes were assessed up to 24 months post-surgery. Measurements included uncorrected-distance visual acuity, corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), refraction, defocus curve, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, and patient-reported outcomes.

Results

Mean spherical equivalent was close to emmetropia for both groups and stable across postoperative visits. Overall, 97.73% and 100% of eyes in the POD F GF IOL group and 95.65% and 100%, of eyes in the POD F IOL group were within ±1.00D of the target refraction at 12 and 24 months, respectively. All patients showed a CDVA of ≥20/25 at 12- and 24-months post-surgery. In both groups, 24 months post-surgery 91% of patients presented a DCIVA of ≥20/25 and 83.3% of patients had a DCNVA of ≥20/25. Defocus curve showed continuous visual acuity, being 20/32 or better in both groups over a 4.00D range between 1.00D and -3.00/-3.50D. Both groups showed good contrast sensitivity values for photopic and mesopic conditions. Overall, 86.4%, 86.4%, and 72.7% of patients implanted with the POD F GF IOL reported not wearing glasses at all for distance, intermediate, and near vision, respectively. These values were 81.8%, 86.4%, and 90.9% for patients implanted with the POD F IOL. Both groups of patients reported similar satisfaction percentages (100% very satisfied/satisfied) and would recommend the procedure (100% definitively yes/probably yes).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates good visual and refractive outcomes for both the FineVision POD F GF and the FineVision POD F IOLs when implanted in Asian eyes.