Measuring Institutional Quality in Head and Neck Surgery Using Hospital-Level Data: Negative Margin Rates and Neck Dissection Yield

Insurance Disparities in Quality of Care Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Importance

Significant insurance status disparities have been demonstrated in head and neck cancer (HNC) outcomes. The effects of insurance status on HNC outcomes may be explained by differential access to high-quality care.

Objective

To evaluate the association of insurance status with the quality of the treating hospital and receipt of guideline-compliant care among patients with HNC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study of data from the California Cancer Registry dataset linked with discharge records and hospital characteristics from the California Department of Health Care Access and Information included adult patients with HNC diagnosed between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from May 10, 2023, to March 25, 2024.

Exposures

Insurance status: commercial, Medicare, Medicaid, uninsured, other, or unknown.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Quality of the treating hospital (tertiles), receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-compliant care, and overall survival.

Results

A total of 23 933 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.8 [12.3] years; 75.3% male) met the inclusion criteria. Treatment in top-tertile hospitals (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95) was associated with improved overall survival compared with treatment in bottom-tertile hospitals. Medicare (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84), Medicaid (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.54-0.66), and uninsured (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.29-0.49) status were associated with lower likelihood of treatment in high-quality hospitals compared with commercial insurance. Among patients with advanced disease, Medicaid (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62-0.83) and uninsured (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93) patients were less likely to receive dual-modality therapy. Among patients with surgically resected advanced disease, Medicaid coverage (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93) was associated with lower likelihood of receiving adjuvant radiotherapy.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found significant insurance disparities in quality of care among patients with HNC. These findings highlight the need for continued health insurance reform in the US to improve the quality of insurance coverage, in addition to expanding access to health insurance.

Identifying Opportunities to Deliver High-Quality Cancer Care Across a Health System: A Clinical Responsibility

OBJECTIVE

We examined process-related quality metrics for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) depending on treating facility type across a health system and region.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective in accordance with Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.

SETTING

Single health system and region.

METHODS

Patients with OSCC diagnosed between 2012 and 2018 were identified from tumor registries of 6 hospitals (1 academic and 5 community) within a single health system. Patients were categorized into 3 care groups: (1) solely at the academic center, (2) solely at community facilities, and (3) combined care at academic and community facilities. Primary outcome measures were process-related quality metrics: positive surgical margin rate, lymph node yield (LNY), adjuvant treatment initiation ≤6 weeks, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-guideline adherence.

RESULTS

A total of 499 patients were included: 307 (61.5%) patients in the academic-only group, 101 (20.2%) in the community-only group, and 91 (18.2%) in the combined group. Surgery at community hospitals was associated with increased odds of positive surgical margins (11.9% vs 2.5%, odds ratio [OR]: 47.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.2-275.86, P < .001) and lower odds of LNY ≥ 18 (52.8% vs 85.9%, OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07-0.33, P < .001) relative to the academic center. Compared with the academic-only group, odds of adjuvant treatment initiation ≤6 weeks were lower for the combined group (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13-0.64, P = .002) and odds of NCCN guideline-adherent treatment were lower in the community only group (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.18-0.70, P = .003).

CONCLUSION

Quality of oral cancer care across the health system and region is comparable to or better-than national standards, indicating good baseline quality of care. Differences by facility type and fragmentation of care present an opportunity for bringing best in-class cancer care across an entire region.

Delays Starting Postoperative Radiotherapy Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Initiating postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) within 6 weeks (42 days) of surgery is the first and only Commission on Cancer (CoC) approved quality metric for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). No study has systematically reviewed nor synthesized the literature to establish national benchmarks for delays in starting PORT.

DATA SOURCES

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies that described time-to-PORT or PORT delays in patients with HNSCC treated in the United States after 2003 were included. Meta-analysis of proportions and continuous measures was performed on nonoverlapping datasets to examine the pooled frequency of PORT delays and time-to-PORT.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies were included in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis. Most studies utilized single-institution (n = 17; 47.2%) or cancer registry (n = 16; 44.4%) data. Twenty-five studies (69.4%) defined PORT delay as >6 weeks after surgery (the definition utilized by the CoC and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines), whereas 4 (11.1%) defined PORT delay as a time interval other than >6 weeks, and 7 (19.4%) characterized time-to-PORT without defining delay. Meta-analysis revealed that 48.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.4-55.9) of patients started PORT > 6 weeks after surgery. Median and mean time-to-PORT were 45.8 (95% CI, 42.4-51.4 days) and 47.4 days (95% CI, 43.4-51.4 days), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Delays in initiating guideline-adherent PORT occur in approximately half of patients with HNSCC. These meta-analytic data can be used to set national benchmarks and assess progress in reducing delays.

Node Count as a Quality Indicator in Surgically Treated Mucosal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer

INTRODUCTION

A yield of ≥18 nodes from neck dissection has been shown to be associated with improved locoregional recurrence rates and survival. We sought to determine factors associated with lymph node yields below this threshold.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent neck dissection as part of definitive surgical treatment for mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) between January 2015 and December 2018 at an academic tertiary referral center was performed. Patients with a history of prior radiation or neck dissection were excluded.

RESULTS

There were 412 neck dissections performed in 323 patients. Specimens containing <18 nodes decreased from 16.2% in 2015-2016 to 7.4% of neck dissections in 2017-2018. The proportion of neck dissections removing <3 levels decreased from 9.1% of neck dissections in 2015-2016 to 4.0% in 2017-2018. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that dissection of ≥3 levels (OR = 0.2 [0.1-0.4]) and neck dissection in 2017-2018 compared to 2015-2016 (OR = 0.4 [0.2-0.8]) were significantly associated with a lower odds of <18 nodes. Stage, site, race, sex, human papillomavirus status, positive nodes, surgeon volume, and pathologist volume were not associated with neck dissection specimens with <18 nodes, after controlling for all other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased recognition of the importance of node count as a quality indicator, and the extent of neck dissection is associated with increased nodal yield from neck dissection. These data suggest that node count can be used as a quality measure of neck dissection for mucosal SCC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:2160-2165, 2023.

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Yield, Lymph Node Density, and pN in Oral Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate thresholds for lymph node yield (LNY), lymph node density (LND), and pN in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma in relation to previous findings in the literature.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective register-based study.

SETTING

Copenhagen Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma database.

METHODS

Appropriate thresholds for LNY, LND, and pN were determined by areas under the curve and subsequently subjected to multivariate analysis. Five-year overall survival and 3-year recurrence-free survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

In total, 413 patients diagnosed with oral squamous cell carcinoma were included. In the pN0 cohort, no superior/prognostic LNY cutoff values were detected. In the pN+ cohort, areas under the curve determined thresholds of LNY, LND, and pN to be 21 nodes, 5%, and 3 metastases, respectively. The 5-year overall survival was 52% for patients with LNY ≥21 vs 38% for patients with LNY <21 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-2.11; P < .05), 60% for patients with LND ≤5% vs 38% for patients with LND >6% (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.03-2.57; P < .05), and 43% for patients with pN <3 vs 26% for patients with pN ≥3 (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-2.15; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased nodal yield, decreased LND, and decreasing number of pN were associated with significantly improved survival outcomes. LNY might serve as a prognosticator of survival as well as a surgical quality indicator. LND may have implications as a tool in cancer staging and treatment planning.

Factors influencing nodal yield in neck dissections for head and neck malignancies

OBJECTIVE

A standard lateral neck dissection should yield at least 18 lymph nodes. The goal of the present study was to examine what factors might influence the number of lymph nodes retrieved during a neck dissection.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary academic referral centre for head and neck oncology. Two hundred and nineteen consecutive neck dissections were examined. Age of the patient and primary site were recorded, along with tumour histology, previous radiotherapy and final nodal count.

RESULTS

The mean age was 62.2 ± 13.0 years. The most common primary site was the oral cavity (38.8 per cent). The mean number of lymph nodes was 30.63 ± 13.9. In total, 17.8 per cent had undergone previous radiotherapy. The mean number of lymph nodes was 33.26 ± 13.27 in patients with no previous radiation exposure and 18.47 ± 9.46 in those with previous radiation treatment.

CONCLUSION

Lymph node yield from a neck dissection is likely multi-factorial in nature. Previous radiotherapy, the only significant contributor, led to a mean reduction of lymph node yield from 33.3 to 18.5.

Eugene Nicholas Myers' Lecture on Head and Neck Cancer, 2020: The Surgeon as a Prognostic Factor in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery

This paper is a transcript of the 29 th Eugene N. Myers, MD International Lecture on Head and Neck Cancer presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) in 2020. By the end of the 19 th century, the survival rate in treated patients was 10%. With the improvements in surgical techniques, currently, about two thirds of patients survive for > 5 years. Teamwork and progress in surgical reconstruction have led to advancements in ablative surgery; the associated adjuvant treatments have further improved the prognosis in the last 30 years. However, prospective trials are lacking; most of the accumulated knowledge is based on retrospective series and some real-world data analyses. Current knowledge on prognostic factors plays a central role in an efficient treatment decision-making process. Although the influence of most tumor- and patient-related prognostic factors in head and neck cancer cannot be changed by medical interventions, some environmental factors-including treatment, decision-making, and quality-can be modified. Ideally, treatment strategy decisions should be taken in dedicated multidisciplinary team meetings. However, evidence suggests that surgeons and hospital volume and specialization play major roles in patient survival after initial or salvage head and neck cancer treatment. The metrics of surgical quality assurance (surgical margins and nodal yield) in neck dissection have a significant impact on survival in head and neck cancer patients and can be influenced by the surgeon's expertise. Strategies proposed to improve surgical quality include continuous performance measurement, feedback, and dissemination of best practice measures.

Surgical factors affecting regionally metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to the parotid gland

BACKGROUND

Understanding the impact of surgical treatment on regionally metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC).

METHODS

Retrospective series of 145 patients undergoing parotidectomy and neck dissection for regionally metastatic cSCC to the parotid. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) analyzed over 3 years. Multivariate analysis was completed using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

OS was 74.5%, DSS was 85.5% and DFS was 64.8%. On multivariate analysis, immune status (HR = 3.225[OS], 5.119[DSS], 2.071[DFS]) and lymphovascular invasion (HR = 2.380[OS], 5.237[DSS], 2.595[DFS]) were predictive for OS, DSS, and DFS. Margin status (HR = 2.296[OS], 2.499[DSS]) and ≥18 resected nodes (HR = 0.242[OS], 0.255[DSS]) were predictive of OS and DSS, while adjuvant therapy was predictive of DSS (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppression and lymphovascular invasion portended worse outcomes in patients with metastatic cSCC to the parotid. Microscopically positive margins and <18 nodes resected are associated with worse OS and DSS, while patients receiving adjuvant therapy had improved DSS.

Transoral Laser Microsurgery With Neck Dissection Versus Radiotherapy for T2N0 Supraglottic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To compare overall survival outcomes associated with transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) with neck dissection versus definitive radiotherapy in the management of T2N0 supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the National Cancer Database concerning patients with cT2N0M0 supraglottic cancer treated with either TLM and neck dissection with minimum lymph node yield of 10 or definitive radiotherapy. Predictors of overall survival were assessed via Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Seventy-six cT2N0 supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma patients who underwent TLM with neck dissection (+/- adjuvant therapy) versus 991 patients who underwent radiotherapy. TLM was associated with an overall survival benefit (OR = 0.574; 95% CI 0.383-0.860) compared with radiotherapy. There was no difference in survival between TLM patients receiving adjuvant treatment and those receiving definitive radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

An up-front, TLM-based surgical approach to cT2N0 supraglottic cancer may offer an overall survival benefit compared with definitive radiotherapy, and should receive more frequent consideration as a primary approach to this disease process.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:601-606, 2023.

CT for estimating adequacy of lymph node dissection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background

Indices obtained from lymph node dissection specimens, specifically lymph node yield (LNY) and lymph node ratio (LNR), have prognostic significance in the setting of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCCa). However, there are currently no validated tools to estimate adequacy of planned lymph node dissection using preoperative data. The present study sought to evaluate CT-derived estimates of lymphatic tissue volumes as a preoperative tool to guide cervical node dissection.

Methods

Fifteen cervical lymph node dissections were performed in 14 subjects with HNSCCa. Preoperative CT-derived estimates of lymphatic tissue volumes were compared with gross pathology tissue volume estimates and pathologically-determined LNY.

Results

Resected tissue volume (calculated using the triaxial ellipsoid method) correlates with CT-derived preoperative lymphatic volume estimates (r = 0.74, p = 0.003) while LNY does not(r = − 0.12, p = 0.67). When excluding pathologically enlarged lymph nodes (“refined” data), a negative correlation was observed between refined CT-derived volume estimates and refined LNY (r = − 0.65, p = 0.009).

Conclusion

In the setting of cervical lymph node dissection, CT-derived lymphatic volume estimates correlate with resected tissue volume, but refined CT-derived volume estimates correlate negatively with refined LNY.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered.

Level of evidence

4

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Use of High-Quality Hospitals Among Oral Cancer Patients in California

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To examine racial/ethnic differences in use of high-quality hospitals in patients treated for oral cancer in California.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cancer database cohort study.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the California Cancer Registry data set linked with discharge records and hospital characteristics from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, and with neighborhood characteristics from the California Neighborhoods Data System. The study cohort comprised adult patients with oral cavity malignancy diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Principal component analysis was used to generate the composite oral cancer-specific hospital quality score. The impact of hospital quality on survival was assessed using Cox regression models with robust standard error using sandwich variance estimators. Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to assess the association between race/ethnicity and use of high-quality hospitals.

RESULTS

Patients treated in hospitals ranked in the top quartile for quality had improved overall survival (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.76-0.98), after adjusting for tumor stage, Charlson comorbidity score, neck dissection, radiotherapy, age, sex, race, and insurance status. Black patients (risk ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.98) were less likely to be treated in high-quality hospitals compared with non-Hispanic White patients.

CONCLUSION

Treatment in high-quality hospitals is associated with improved survival for patients with oral cancer. However, black patients are less likely to be treated in high-quality hospitals compared with non-Hispanic white patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2021.

Applying the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons quality outcomes metrics to a UK oncology and reconstructive surgery service - benchmarking the data

The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is soon to implement the Quality Outcomes in Oral in Maxillofacial Surgery (QOMS) to provide a platform for quality management across the specialty in the UK. The initial oncology and reconstruction audits for QOMS involves data collection on specific procedures and metrics. The aim of this report is to determine their appropriateness using extant audit datasets in our institution that overlap substantially with the QOMS audits. Pre-existing datasets comprising information on patients treated for oral cavity SCC with curative intent were analysed. Data on surgical margins, lymphadenectomy lymph node yield, delay between surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, duration of hospital stay, and complications including flap failures were analysed. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 25. Run charts describing longitudinal data were generated using SPC for Excel version 6. Twenty three patients (3.1%) of 701 resections had a positive surgical margin reported. Seventeen (4.3%) of patients had less than 18 LNs in the ND specimen analysed. Mean time to start date of adjuvant therapy was 62 days. Only 9% of patients commenced adjuvant therapy within 6 weeks. The median duration of stay was 18 days. In 1153 free flaps a failure rate of 4.3% was identified. A total of 1349 complications (CD I-V) were recorded in the 1111 patients undergoing major surgery with free flap reconstruction. The QOMS selected metrics for oncology and reconstruction are clinically relevant, readily measurable, and likely to be actionable by the surgical team.

Neck dissection and trans oral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is a modality in the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma(OPSCC). This study was planned to determine whether Selective Neck Dissection (SND) is oncological safe procedure even in patients with lymph node metastases.

METHODS

OPSCC patients were divided into Modified Radical Neck Dissection (MRND) and SND groups. The outcome measures were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and regional recurrence free survival (RRFS).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven SNDs and 18 MRNDs were performed. Regional relapse rate was 6.1% in SND group whilst 18.8% in MRND group(p=0.19). The 5-year OS, DFS and RRFS rates' differences were not statistically significant between SND and MRND groups (p=0.40, p=0.42 and p=0.18, respectively). At multivariate analysis, advanced stage impacted the 5-year OS and DFS(HR=9.39, p<0.01 and HR=11.03, p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The SND seems to be effective in a TORS framework. The indication should be accurately discussed by the multidisciplinary tumor board.

Quality metrics for head and neck cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The standardization of quality measures has been key in advancing the aims of the National Quality Forum established to improve health outcomes.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to identify eligible patients. Two quality metrics were evaluated including time to treatment initiation (TTI) and chemotherapy in locoregionally head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

RESULTS

TTI was significantly associated with mortality reflected by a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.13 for 60-90 days of TTI (95% CI 1.08-1.17), 1.19 for >90 days of TTI (95% CI 1.13-1.26). Patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC had an 87% adherence to chemotherapy, which correlated with reduced mortality (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.55-0.59). Patients treated at high quality centers had a 9% increase in survival (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.88-0.93).

CONCLUSION

We identified that both TTI and chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced HNSCC meet criteria for valid quality metrics potentially suitable for national adoption.

Microscopic positive surgical margins in thyroid carcinoma: a proposal for thyroid oncology teams

PURPOSE

In the case of well-differentiated thyroid cancer, the importance of microscopic margin status remains controversial. We discuss the relevance of the effect of microscopic positive surgical margins in the early stages of differentiated thyroid cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search and review of available evidence in English literature was undertaken.

RESULTS

A previous meta-analysis did not find an association between microscopic positive surgical margins and local recurrence. Heterogeneity of definitions and differences between microscopic surgical margins and extrathyroid extension are discussed. Impact on clinical decision-making is explored.

CONCLUSION

The finding of microscopic positive surgical margins in a patient with a thyroid tumor without intraoperative evidence of macroscopic invasion to adjacent structures, with complete resection made by the surgeon and without pathological report of extrathyroid extension, does not have a worse prognostic effect. We present a classification of surgical margins that may help thyroid oncology teams to tailor further management in patients with thyroid cancer.

Impact of Lymph Node Yield in Patients Undergoing Total Laryngectomy and Neck Dissection

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of lymph node yield (LNY) in patients undergoing neck dissection at the time of total laryngectomy (TL). To determine the impact of radiation therapy (RT) on LNY.

METHODS

Retrospective review of LNY and clinical outcomes in 232 patients undergoing primary or salvage total laryngectomy (TL) with ND.

RESULTS

Preoperative RT significantly decreased mean LNY from 31.7 to 23.9 nodes (P < .001). In primary TL patients, age (P < .001) and positive margins (P = .044) were associated with decreased OS. In salvage TL patients, only positive margins was associated with poorer OS (P = .009). No LNY cutoff provided significant OS or DFS benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy significantly reduces LNY in patients undergoing TL and ND. Within a single institution cohort, positive margins, but not LNY, is associated with survival in both primary and salvage TL patients.Level of Evidence: 4.

Impact of Lymph Node Yield on Survival in Surgically Treated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objectives

(1) To estimate the association between neck dissection lymph node yield (LNY) and survival among patients with surgically treated human papilloma virus (HPV)–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). (2) To identify a clinically relevant quality metric for surgical treatment of HPV-related OPSCC.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

National Cancer Database.

Subjects and Methods

From the National Cancer Database, 4130 patients were identified with HPV-associated OPSCC treated with primary surgery from 2010 to 2016. Based on prior literature, an adequate neck dissection LNY was defined as ≥18 lymph nodes. To determine whether LNY is associated with survival, univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed. Analysis was stratified by adjuvant therapy regimen.

Results

A total of 2113 patients (51.2%) underwent surgery with or without adjuvant radiation (S ± RT), and 2017 patients (48.8%) underwent surgery with adjuvant chemoradiation. LNY ≥18 was associated with a 5-year survival benefit of 7.15% (91.7% for LNY ≥18, 84.5% for LNY <18, P = .004) for the S ± RT cohort on unadjusted survival analysis. For the S ± RT group, LNY ≥18 was associated with decreased hazard of death (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29-0.70; P < .001) after adjustment for patient characteristics, TNM staging, surgical margins, extranodal extension, and treating facility characteristics. For surgery with adjuvant chemoradiation, the adjusted hazard ratio estimate for LNY ≥18 was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.41-1.00), but the result was not statistically significant ( P = .052).

Conclusion

An adequate LNY from a neck dissection may affect survival when HPV-related OPSCC is treated with up-front surgery.

Robotic surgery of head and neck cancers, a narrative review

Head and neck cancers are the most common cancers in the body. Treatments are determined on the basis of the location and stage of the primary tumor. The goal of treatment is to eliminate the tumor, prevent recurrence or metastasis, and maintain the quality of life. There are several treatments available for the management of head and neck cancers, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, new molecular agents, and a combination of them. Transoral robotic technique is a short-time operation using a type of robotic machine in which the patient undergoes anesthesia for a shorter time and the side effects of this operation and the time of hospitalization are less than open surgery. Due to the importance of speed and accuracy in head and neck cancer surgery and the importance of application of robotics in surgery, the present study was designed and implemented to review the application of robotics in the management of head and neck cancers. In this review study, the keywords: application, robotic, surgical, head cancer, transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and neck cancer, were searched in ISI, PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar databases. Related articles written domestically or abroad that have covered areas such as the background of transoral robotic surgery, maintaining organ function and approaches, the advantages and disadvantages of TORS, the affordability of TORS, the combination of TORS with other therapeutic approaches published from 2003 to 2019 were reviewed. The use of robotic surgery for precise operations such as head and neck cancers seems to be essential. More advanced robotic devices are expected to expand the surgery treatment for head and neck cancers as well as the results of using TORS for oncologic optimization and acceptability of results while maintaining organ function and patient's quality of life.

Quality Indicators of Central Compartment Neck Dissection in Thyroid Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Quality metrics are an increasingly important means of improving patient care. Variability in the number of lymph nodes removed during central compartment lymph node dissection (CCLND) at the time of thyroidectomy has not been studied.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was performed using American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) data.

SETTING

Centers in North America and worldwide contributing data to ACS-NSQIP and performing thyroidectomy on adults in inpatient and outpatient settings were included.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Adult patients undergoing thyroidectomy with or without CCLND were included. Outcomes of interest were number of nodes removed during CCLND and risks of postoperative hypocalcemia.

RESULTS

In total, 6108 patients met inclusion criteria (1565 with CCLND). The median number of lymph nodes removed during CCLND was 2. There was no statistically significant association between postoperative hypocalcemia and CCNLD, regardless of number of nodes removed. However, we were underpowered to detect this association based on the overall low nodal yield of many CCLNDs performed.

CONCLUSION

In many cases where CCLND is documented as part of thyroidectomy, very few lymph nodes are removed. Our ability to draw conclusions regarding the effect of CCLND on postoperative hypocalcemia is restricted due to the limited nature of many CCLNDs performed.

Best Practice in Surgical Treatment of Malignant Head and Neck Tumors

Purpose of review: Defining the best practice of surgical care for patients affected by malignant head and neck tumors is of great importance. In this review we aim to describe the evolution of “best practice” guidelines in the context of quality-of-care measures and discuss current evidence on “best practice” for the surgical treatment of cancers of the sino-nasal tract, skull base, aero-digestive tract, and the neck.

Recent findings: Current evidence based on certain structure and outcome indicators, but mostly based on process indicators already helps defining the framework of “Best practice” for head and neck cancer surgery. However, many aspects of surgical treatment still require in-depth research.

Summary: While a framework of “Best practice” strategies already exists for the conduction of the surgical treatment of head and neck cancers, many questions still require additional research in particular in case of rare histologies in the head and neck region.

Robotic surgery of head and neck cancers, a narrative review

Head and neck cancers are the most common cancers in the body. Treatments are determined on the basis of the location and stage of the primary tumor. The goal of treatment is to eliminate the tumor, prevent recurrence or metastasis, and maintain the quality of life. There are several treatments available for the management of head and neck cancers, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, new molecular agents, and a combination of them. Transoral robotic technique is a short-time operation using a type of robotic machine in which the patient undergoes anesthesia for a shorter time and the side effects of this operation and the time of hospitalization are less than open surgery. Due to the importance of speed and accuracy in head and neck cancer surgery and the importance of application of robotics in surgery, the present study was designed and implemented to review the application of robotics in the management of head and neck cancers. In this review study, the keywords: application, robotic, surgical, head cancer, transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and neck cancer, were searched in ISI, PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar databases. Related articles written domestically or abroad that have covered areas such as the background of transoral robotic surgery, maintaining organ function and approaches, the advantages and disadvantages of TORS, the affordability of TORS, the combination of TORS with other therapeutic approaches published from 2003 to 2019 were reviewed. The use of robotic surgery for precise operations such as head and neck cancers seems to be essential. More advanced robotic devices are expected to expand the surgery treatment for head and neck cancers as well as the results of using TORS for oncologic optimization and acceptability of results while maintaining organ function and patient's quality of life.

Association of Hospital Volume With Laryngectomy Outcomes in Patients With Larynx Cancer

Importance

A volume-outcome association exists for larynx cancer surgery, but to date it has not been investigated for specific surgical procedures.

Objectives

To characterize the volume-outcome association specifically for laryngectomy surgery and to identify a minimum hospital volume threshold associated with improved outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cross-sectional study, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify 45 156 patients who underwent laryngectomy procedures for a malignant laryngeal or hypopharyngeal neoplasm between January 2001 and December 2011. The analysis was performed in 2018. Hospital laryngectomy volume was modeled as a categorical variable.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Associations between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality, complications, length of hospitalization, and costs were examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

Among 45 156 patients (mean age, 62.6 years; age range, 20-96 years; 80.2% male) at 5516 hospitals, higher-volume hospitals were more likely to be teaching hospitals in urban locations; were more likely to treat patients who had hypopharyngeal cancer, were of white race/ethnicity, were admitted electively, had no comorbidity, and had private insurance; and were more likely to perform flap reconstruction or concurrent neck dissection. After controlling for all other variables, hospitals treating more than 6 cases per year were associated with lower odds of surgical and medical complications, with a greater reduction in the odds of complications with increasing hospital volume. High-volume hospitals in the top-volume quintile (>28 cases per year) were associated with decreased odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.88), postoperative surgical complications (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50-0.79), and acute medical complications (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.81). A statistically meaningful negative association was observed between very high-volume hospital care and the mean incremental length of hospitalization (-3.7 days; 95% CI, -4.9 to -2.4 days) and hospital-related costs (-$4777; 95% CI, -$9463 to -$900).

Conclusions and Relevance

Laryngectomy outcomes appear to be associated with hospital volume, with reduced morbidity associated with a minimum hospital volume threshold and with reduced mortality, morbidity, length of hospitalization, and costs associated with higher hospital volume. These data support the concept of centralization of complex care at centers able to meet minimum volume thresholds to improve patient outcomes.

Margins in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Predictors, Outcomes, and the Endoscopic Approach

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with positive margins following surgical management of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC), especially with regard to endoscopic treatment.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of adult patients with clinically staged tumor (T)1 to T4a SNSCC within the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2014, factors were associated with positive margins using multivariable binary logistic regression. Cases from 2010 to 2014 had surgical approach (open vs. endoscopic) available and were analyzed in a subgroup to assess the association of surgical approach with margin status. The association of margin status with overall survival (OS) and additional therapy administration was also assessed.

RESULTS

We identified 2,968 cases, of which 807 (27.2%) had positive margins. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with positive margins included higher T stage (T4a vs. T1: odds ratio [OR] 2.768 [95% CI 2.143-3.577]), less differentiated tumors (poorly differentiated vs. well differentiated: OR 1.403 [95% CI 1.060-1.856]), and tumors in the ethmoid sinus (vs. nasal cavity; OR 1.889 [95% CI 1.305-2.734]). Cases treated at higher volume facilities (HVFs) were associated with a lower likelihood of positive margins (OR 0.716 [95% CI 0.582-0.881]). Positive margins were associated with decreased OS (hazard ratio 1.672 [95% CI 1.464-1.908]) and an increased rate of additional therapy (OR 1.966 [95% confidence interval 1.597-2.421]). An endoscopic approach was not associated with an increased likelihood of obtaining positive margins (vs. open; OR 1.151 [0.903-1.651]).

CONCLUSION

Positive margins were less likely when performed at HVFs and more likely in the ethmoid sinus than other subsites. Importantly, there was no association between positive margins and surgical approach. Endoscopic surgery may offer a safe, less invasive alternative to open surgery for select patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 130:E388-E396, 2020.

Recognizing Persistent Disease in Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer and Association with Lymph Node Yield and Ratio

OBJECTIVE

To establish the association between lymph node yield and ratio in neck dissection for well-differentiated thyroid cancer and risk for persistent postoperative disease.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy for thyroid carcinoma.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Included patients underwent central and/or lateral neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma at our institution between 1994 and 2015. They were divided into a persistent disease group with biochemical and structural disease (49 patients) and a disease-free group with no disease after a minimum 2 years of follow-up (175 patients). Demographic characteristics, adjuvant therapy, tumor, and lymph node features were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the groups. The mean nodal yield of patients with central and lateral neck persistence was significantly lower than that of patients remaining disease free (4.8 vs. 11.9: odds ratio [OR] 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.8; P < .001; 14.8 vs. 31.0: OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94; P < .001, respectively). Nodal ratio was higher in patients with persistence in the central and lateral neck (74.2% vs 29.4%: OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08; P < .001; 54.2% vs 19.8%: OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12; P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower lymph node yield and higher node ratio from cervical lymph node dissections are associated with persistent disease and have potential applications in surgical adequacy.

Analysis of Process-Related Quality Metrics and Survival of Patients with Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objective

To analyze the association of prior reported key quality metrics—neck dissection ≥18 nodes, radiation oncology referral for stage III/IV disease, unplanned surgery ≤14 days, and unplanned readmission ≤30 days—with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in oral cavity cancer (OCC).

Study Design

A retrospective chart review.

Setting

A tertiary care center from 1995 to 2016.

Subjects and Methods

Data from patients with OCC who underwent primary surgery were studied. The association of quality metrics and pathology with DFS/OS was determined by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

Results

A total of 514 patients were included, and 398 (77.4%) underwent elective neck dissection. Key metrics were not associated with DFS on analysis, but higher pathologic stage and extracapsular extension (ECE) were. When stratified by stage, unplanned readmission within 30 days was associated with decreased survival on multivariate analysis (HR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.85; P = .02) for patients with clinical stage III or IV disease. ECE was associated with decreased survival among these patients as well. Neck dissection with ≤18 nodes (HR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.86; P = .004) and unplanned surgery within 14 days (HR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.96; P = .03) were associated with decreased survival on univariate analysis but not on multivariate analysis. ECE and higher-stage disease were associated with decreased OS on multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

In this study, aggressive pathology, rather than adherence to key quality metrics, was associated with lower DFS and OS among patients with OCC. More studies are needed to elucidate the association of quality metrics with survival.

Functional Organ Preservation Surgery in Head and Neck Cancer: Transoral Robotic Surgery and Beyond

In recent years, interest in functional organ preservation surgery (FOPS) in the treatment of head and neck cancer has increased dramatically as clinicians seek to minimize the adverse effects of treatment while maximizing survival and quality of life. In this context, the use of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is becoming increasingly common. TORS is a relatively new and rapidly-evolving technique, with a growing range of treatment indications. A wide range of novel, flexible surgical robots are now in development and their commercialization is expected to significantly expand the current indications for TORS. In the present review, we discuss the current and future role of this organ-preserving modality as the central element in the multimodal treatment of head and neck cancer.

Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

The aim of the current work is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of the neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, regional disease control, neck recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six clinical scenarios were devised; three for oral cavity cancer and three for oropharynx cancer, and recommendations were generated for each one.

RECOMMENDATIONS

For oral cavity cancers, clinical scenarios focused on the indications for and the hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, indications for postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, and whether radiotherapy alone is sufficient elective treatment of an undissected neck compared with high-quality neck dissection. For oropharynx cancers, clinical scenarios focused on hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, factors that would favor operative versus nonoperative primary management, and clarifying criteria for an incomplete response to definitive chemoradiation for which salvage neck dissection would be recommended. Consensus was reached and recommendations were made for all six clinical scenarios. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .