Persistent Treatment-Emergent Central Sleep Apnea (TECSA) Following Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation

Purpose

Since 2001, hypoglossal nerve stimulators (HNS) have been used worldwide to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Recently, a few studies reported treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) with spontaneous resolution following HNS. However, the evidence of persistent development of TECSA during long-term care visits was lacking. As a result, this study first report two patients with persistent TECSA and describe their development phenotype during more than two years of follow-up visits to help explore the influencing factors and underlying mechanisms.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study included twenty-seven patients who underwent HNS implantation from 2016 to 2021. Their demographic data, pre- and postoperative sleep study characteristics, and device use settings were collected. The possible factors associated with post-operative elevated CSA (central apnea index ≥5) were evaluated. Moreover, the development phenotype of the TECSA was observed and followed up with a titration trial study.

Results

Among overall 27 patients with OSA, 3 patients with an increased preoperative Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS) got an elevated CSA (CAI ≥ 5). Two of these 3 patients developed a persistent TECSA with a significant negative correlation between obstructive apnea index (OAI) and central and mixed sleep apnea index (CMAI) (R = -0.745, P = 0.021). These development phenotypes might be associated with different stimulation amplitudes of the HNS device. Furthermore, the following titration trial study also suggested that different amplitudes would influence the development of TECSA following HNS.

Conclusion

OSA patients with severe daytime sleepiness are more likely to have elevated CSA following HNS. An inappropriate stimulation amplitude might influence the development course of TECSA in such patients.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has been shown to be a safe alternative in the treatment of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A recent meta-analysis of 12 studies by Costantino et al. indicated the surgical success rates at 55-75%, a reduction of the apnea hypopnea index (AHI) of 18 events/h, and a reduction of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) of 2.9-5.3. After animal studies in the 1970s, the first trial on humans to decrease upper airway resistance by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the genioglossus was reported in 1989. A separate stimulation of protruding and retracting muscles was realized in 1995 by fine-wire electrodes that were placed into the tongue transoral. Over the next years, several companies developed implantable devices for hypoglossal stimulation in OSA. Initially, devices were developed that used unilateral stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve. In 2014, a device for unilateral respiratory frequency-controlled hypoglossal stimulation finally received FDA approval after a successful phase III trial. In recent years, a device for bilateral breath rate-independent stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve has been added to these approaches as a new development. Accordingly, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, on the one hand, is now an established tool for patients with OSA when standard treatments are not satisfactory. Beyond that, hypoglossal stimulation is undergoing a continuous and impressive development like hardly any other field of surgical therapy for OSA.

Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea associated with non-positive airway pressure therapies in obstructive sleep apnea patients: A systematic review

This systematic review summarizes the prevalence of treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) occurring with therapies other than positive airway pressure (PAP) for the management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We describe its natural course as well as the proposed underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and the clinical management of affected patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and the Cochrane Library was performed until June 2020. Eighteen studies (n = 284 patients) were included. TECSA was observed in 31 patients with the use of four different medical devices (mandibular advancement device, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, tongue stabilizing device and nasal expiratory PAP) and after three different types of surgical treatments (tracheostomy, maxillofacial surgery and oro-nasal surgery). Due to the paucity of data available, it was not possible to establish a clear prevalence rate of TECSA for each alternative treatment. After the initiation of non-PAP treatments, a systematic reassessment of the treatment efficacy with follow-up sleep studies will be helpful to identify TECSA. A spontaneous resolution over time was described as well as a persistence of TECSA. In this case, treatment should focus on patients' specific underlying pathophysiology. Overall, the limited current literature suggests that this phenomenon is rare (<4%).

A case of Cheyne-Stokes breathing emerging in a patient with atrial fibrillation and an implanted hypoglossal nerve stimulator

NONE

Treatment emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) can occur with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy, mandibular advancement devices, and now recent cases with hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HNS) therapy during treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). There have been few published reports of Cheyne-Stokes breathing (CSB) emerging after implantation of a hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HNS). We present a case of a 76-year-old male with chronic atrial fibrillation and OSA who developed significant CSB after implantation of a HNS device. As popularity increases for alternative treatments of OSA, there should be close monitoring for emergence of CSB, especially in those who may have a propensity for high loop gain abnormalities contributing to central sleep apneas, such as patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Further research is needed on CSA in patients with HNS implantation and atrial fibrillation, the prevalence of TECSA in the growing HNS therapy population, and the development of future management strategies.