Longitudinal Analysis of Caregiver Burden in Head and Neck Cancer

Predisposing, Enabling, and Need Factors Driving Palliative Care Use in Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Characterizing factors associated with palliative care (PC) use in patients with stage III and VI head and neck cancer using Anderson's behavioral model of health service use.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of the 2004 to 2020 National Cancer Database.gg METHODS: We used multivariate logistic regression to assess the association of predisposing, enabling, and need factors with PC use. We also investigated the association of these factors with interventional PC type (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery) and refusal of curative treatment in the last 6 months of life.

RESULTS

Five percent of patients received PC. "Predisposing factors" associated with less PC use include Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 086; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.97) and white and black race (vs white: aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.22). "Enabling factors" associated with lower PC include private insurance (vs uninsured: aOR, 064; 95% CI, 0.53-0.77) and high-income (aOR, 078; 95% CI, 0.71-0.85). "Need factors" associated with higher PC use include stage IV (vs stage III cancer: aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 2.11-2.40) and higher comorbidity index (vs Index 1: aOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.42-1.75). High-income (aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.85) and private insurance (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.53, 0.77) were associated with higher interventional PC use and lower curative treatment refusal (insurance: aOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55, 0.67; income aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.44, 0.52).

CONCLUSION

Low PC uptake is attributed to patients' race/culture, financial capabilities, and disease severity. Culturally informed counseling, clear guidelines on PC indication, and increasing financial accessibility of PC may increase timely and appropriate use of this service.

Addressing Financial Toxicity in Head and Neck Cancer-A Crucial Imperative

This Viewpoint calls for consideration of the financial costs of head and neck cancer care when choosing treatment strategies for patients who may face severe financial stress or insolvency due to cancer treatment.

Trajectory of Caregiver Burden and Associated Factors in Family Caregivers of Individuals with Colorectal Cancer: A Longitudinal, Observational Multicenter Study

Purpose

To (1) investigate the changes in 5 domains (lack of family support, impact on finance, impact on daily schedule, impact on health, and self-esteem) of family caregiver (FC) burden and overall burden for first diagnosed colorectal cancer; (2) exploring changes in FC burden for colorectal cancer patients over time and analyze the trajectory and sub-trajectories of FC burden; and (3) identify the FC-related and patient-related factors most associated with the overall FC burden and each of its sub-trajectories.

Patients and methods

This study is a descriptive longitudinal study. A convenience sampling method was used to recruit patients with colorectal cancer and their primary FCs from seven hospitals.

Results

A total of 185 pairs of first diagnosed colorectal cancer patient and their FC were investigated for 4 times. The results reveal the overall burden and 5 domains of burden showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing, and the burden was the heaviest at the time in the middle of chemotherapy. In the course of time, the aspect that caused the greatest amount of burden on average transitioned from the "effect on daily schedule" (range= 3.3 and 3.9) to the "effect on finances" (range= 3.1 to 3.4).

Conclusion

Almost 88% of FCs have a either a moderate or a high level of burden. The quality of life of patients and the self-efficacy, social support and care ability of FCs have a great impact on the overall FC burden and each sub-trajectory.

An open, multicenter, exploratory study of apatinib mesylate maintenance therapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (ChiCTR1800019375)

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the efficacy of apatinib in maintenance therapy in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).

METHODS

Twenty-six patients from three centers were enrolled from November 2018 to September 2021. These patients received 2 weeks apatinib, administered at 250 mg qd. Then apatinib dose may be administered to 500 mg qd continuous in 4 weeks cycle if no patients experienced adverse reaction. Enrolled patients can receive a combination of radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life (QOL) score, and adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

Median PFS of all patients was 3.2 months (95% CI: 2.06-4.33). Median OS of all patients was 7.3 months (95% CI: 2.14-12.46). The DCR was 92.3%. The ORR was 30.8%. In univariate analysis, the results showed that ECOG score 0-1 (HR = 0.31, p = 0.006) and treated with apatinib for more than 60 days (HR = 0.31, p = 0.003) were independent prognostic indicators affecting PFS, and ECOG score 0-1 (HR = 0.40, p = 0.027) and moderately differentiated or highly differentiated (HR = 0.38, p = 0.048) were independent prognostic indicators of OS. The most common adverse events among treated subjects included hypertension (46.1%), fatigue (42.3%), and hand-foot syndrome (23.1%). There were only two cases (7.7%) of Grade III or above adverse reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance therapy with apatinib is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in patients with R/M HNSCC.