1
|
Cai H, Lin Y, Wu Y, Wang Y, Li S, Zhang Y, Zhuang J, Liu X, Guan G. The prognostic model and immune landscape based on cancer-associated fibroblast features for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Heliyon 2024; 10:e28673. [PMID: 38590874 PMCID: PMC11000021 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to construct a nomogram based on CAF features to predict the cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. Methods The EPIC algorithm was employed to calculate the proportion of CAFs. based on the differentially expressed genes between the high and low CAF proportion subgroups, prognostic genes were identified via LASSO and Cox regression analyses. They were then used to construct a prognostic risk signature. Moreover, the GSE39582 and GGSE38832 datasets were used for external validation. Lastly, the level of immune infiltration was evaluated using ssGSEA, ESTIMATE, CIBERSORTx, and TIMER. Results A higher level of CAF infiltration was associated with a worse prognosis. Additionally, the number of metastasized lymph nodes and distant metastases, as well as the level of immune infiltration were higher in the high CAF proportion subgroup. Five prognostic genes (SMOC2, TUBAL3, C2CD4A, MAP1B, BMP8A) were identified and subsequently incorporated into the prognostic risk signature to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS rates in the training and validation sets. Differences in survival rates were also determined in the external validation cohort. Furthermore, independent prognostic factors, including TNM stage and risk score, were combined to established a nomogram. Notably, our results revealed that the proportions of macrophages and neutrophils and the levels of cytokines secreted by M2 macrophages were higher in the high-risk subgroup. Finally, the prognostic genes were significantly associated with the level of immune cell infiltration. Conclusion Herein, a nomogram based on CAF features was developed to predict the CSS rate of LARC patients. The risk model was capable of reflecting differences in the level of immune cell infiltration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huajun Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yijuan Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yong Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ye Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shoufeng Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yiyi Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jinfu Zhuang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xing Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Guoxian Guan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goffredo P, Allievi N, Koh CE, Di Fabio F, Hassan I. Good Medicine Does Not Compensate for Bad Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:e250. [PMID: 38150317 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Goffredo
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Niccolo Allievi
- Department of Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Cherry E Koh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Francesco Di Fabio
- Rectal Cancer Unit, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Imran Hassan
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu Y, Wu J, Wu H, Qiu J, Wu S, Hong L, Xu B, Shao L. Prediction of liver metastasis and recommended optimal follow-up nursing in rectal cancer. Nurs Health Sci 2024; 26:e13102. [PMID: 38402869 DOI: 10.1111/nhs.13102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
We aimed to analyze and investigate the clinical factors that influence the occurrence of liver metastasis in locally advanced rectal cancer patients, with an attempt to assist patients in devising the optimal imaging-based follow-up nursing. Between June 2011 and May 2021, patients with rectal cancer at our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. A random survival forest model was developed to predict the probability of liver metastasis and provide a practical risk-based approach to surveillance. The results indicated that age, perineural invasion, and tumor deposit were significant factors associated with the liver metastasis and survival. The liver metastasis risk of the low-risk group was higher at 6-21 months, with a peak occurrence time in the 15th month. The liver metastasis risk of the high-risk group was higher at 0-24 months, with a peak occurrence time in the 8th month. In general, our clinical model could predict liver metastasis in rectal cancer patients. It provides a visualization tool that can aid physicians and nurses in making clinical decisions, by detecting the probability of liver metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilin Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Junxin Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Haixia Wu
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jianjian Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Shiji Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Liang Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Benhua Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Lingdong Shao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Seow-En I, Wu J, Tan IEH, Zhao Y, Seah AWM, Wee IJY, Ying-Ru Ng Y, Kwong-Wei Tan E. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision With Delayed Coloanal Anastomosis (TaTME-DCAA) Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (LTME) and Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision (RTME) for Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Short-term Outcomes, Bowel Function, and Cost. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2024; 34:54-61. [PMID: 37987634 PMCID: PMC10829900 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Total mesorectal excision (TME) with delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) is surgical option for low rectal cancer, replacing conventional immediate coloanal anastomosis (ICAA) with bowel diversion. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of transanal TME (TaTME) with DCAA versus laparoscopic TME (LTME) with ICAA versus robotic TME (RTME) with ICAA. METHODS This was a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of patients who underwent elective TaTME-DCAA between November 2021 and June 2022. Patients were propensity-score matched in a ratio of 1:3 to patients who underwent LTME-ICAA and RTME-ICAA from January 2019 to December 2020. Outcome measures were histopathologic results, postoperative morbidity, function, and inpatient costs. RESULTS Twelve patients in the TaTME-DCAA group were compared with 36 patients in the LTME-ICAA and RTME-ICAA groups each after propensity score matching. Histopathologic results and postoperative morbidity rates were statistically similar. Overall stoma-related complication rates in the ICAA groups were 11%. Median total length of hospital stays for TME plus stoma reversal surgery was similar across all techniques (10 vs. 10 vs. 9 days; P =0.532). Despite a significantly shorter duration of follow-up, bowel function after TaTME-DCAA was comparable to that of LTME-ICAA and RTME-ICAA. Overall median inpatient costs of TaTME-DCAA were comparable to LTME-ICAA and significantly cheaper than RTME-ICAA ($31,087 vs. $29,927 vs. $36,750; P =0.002). CONCLUSIONS TaTME with DCAA is a feasible and safe technique compared with other minimally invasive methods of TME, while avoiding bowel diversion and stoma-related complications, as well as comparing favorably in terms of overall hospitalization costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Seow-En
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital
| | - Jingting Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital
| | | | - Yun Zhao
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
| | | | - Ian Jun Yan Wee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parnasa SY, Mizrahi I, Helou B, Cohen A, Abu Gazala M, Pikarsky AJ, Shussman N. Incidence and Risk Factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome following Trans-Anal Total Mesorectal Excision. J Clin Med 2024; 13:437. [PMID: 38256571 PMCID: PMC10816902 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trans-anal total mesorectal excision (Ta-TME) is a novel approach for the resection of rectal cancer. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a frequent functional disorder that might follow restorative proctectomy. Data regarding bowel function after Ta-TME are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for the development of LARS following Ta-TME. METHODS A prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent Ta-TME for rectal cancer at our institution was reviewed. All patients who were operated on from January 2018 to December 2021 were evaluated. The LARS score questionnaire was used via telephone interviews. Incidence, severity and risk factors for LARS were evaluated. RESULTS Eighty-five patients underwent Ta-TME for rectal cancer between January 2018 and December 2021. Thirty-five patients were excluded due to ostomy status, death, local disease recurrence, ileal pouch or lack of compliance. Fifty patients were included in the analysis. LARS was diagnosed in 76% of patients. Anastomosis distance from dentate line was identified as a risk factor for LARS via multivariate analysis (p = 0.042). Neo-adjuvant therapy, hand sewn anastomosis and anastomotic leak did not increase the risk of LARS. CONCLUSION LARS is a frequent condition following ta-TME, as it is used for other approaches to low anterior resection. Anastomosis distance from dentate line is an independent risk factor for LARS. In this study neo-adjuvant therapy, hand sewn anastomosis and anastomotic leak did not increase the risk of LARS. Further studies with longer follow-up times are required to better understand the functional outcomes following Ta-TME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Noam Shussman
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel; (S.Y.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Janczak J, Ukegjini K, Bischofberger S, Turina M, Müller PC, Steffen T. Quality of Surgical Outcome Reporting in Randomised Clinical Trials of Multimodal Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:26. [PMID: 38201454 PMCID: PMC10778098 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) continue to provide the best evidence for treatment options, but the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical outcomes and complication data vary widely. The aim of this study was to measure the quality of reporting of the surgical outcome and complication data in RCTs of rectal cancer treatment and whether this quality has changed over time. METHODS Eligible articles with the keywords ("rectal cancer" OR "rectal carcinoma") AND ("radiation" OR "radiotherapy") that were RCTs and published in the English, German, Polish, or Italian language were identified by reviewing all abstracts published from 1982 through 2022. Two authors independently screened and analysed all studies. The quality of the surgical outcome and complication data was assessed based on fourteen criteria, and the quality of RCTs was evaluated based on a modified Jadad scale. The primary outcome was the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical results and complication data. RESULTS A total of 340 articles reporting multimodal therapy outcomes for 143,576 rectal cancer patients were analysed. A total of 7 articles (2%) met all 14 reporting criteria, 13 met 13 criteria, 27 met from 11 to 12 criteria, 36 met from 9 to 10 criteria, 76 met from 7 to 8 criteria, and most articles met fewer than 7 criteria (mean 5.5 criteria). Commonly underreported criteria included complication severity (15% of articles), macroscopic integrity of mesorectal excision (17% of articles), length of stay (18% of articles), number of lymph nodes (21% of articles), distance between the tumour and circumferential resection margin (CRM) (26% of articles), surgical radicality according to the site of the primary tumour (R0 vs. R1 + R2) (29% of articles), and CRM status (38% of articles). CONCLUSION Inconsistent surgical outcome and complication data reporting in multimodal rectal cancer treatment RCTs is standard. Standardised reporting of clinical and oncological outcomes should be established to facilitate comparing studies and results of related research topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Janczak
- Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital for the Region Fürstenland Toggenburg, CH-9500 Wil, Switzerland;
| | - Kristjan Ukegjini
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| | - Stephan Bischofberger
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| | - Matthias Turina
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Philip C. Müller
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Thomas Steffen
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jethwa KR, Harmsen WS, Hawkins MA, Kim H, Sanford NN, Wojcieszynski AP, Olsen JR. Short-Course Radiation Therapy and the RAPIDO Trial: Too Short, Too Soon? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:568-570. [PMID: 37739607 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - William S Harmsen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Maria A Hawkins
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hyun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Nina N Sanford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Jeffrey R Olsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sylla P, Berho M, Sands D, Ricardo A, Bonaccorso A, Moshier E, Hain E, Letchinger R, Marks J, Whiteford M, Mclemore E, Maykel J, Alavi K, Zaghiyan K, Chadi S, Shawki SF, Steele S, Pigazzi A, Albert M, DeBeche-Adams T, Polydorides A, Wexner S. Discordance in Total Mesorectal Excision Specimen Grading in a Prospective Phase 2 Multicenter Rectal Cancer Trial: Are We Overestimating the Quality of Our Resections? Ann Surg 2023; 278:452-463. [PMID: 37450694 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report the results of a rigorous quality control (QC) process in the grading of total mesorectal excision (TME) specimens during a multicenter prospective phase 2 trial of transanal TME. BACKGROUND Grading of TME specimens is based on the macroscopic assessment of the mesorectum and standardized through synoptic pathology reporting. TME grade is a strong predictor of outcomes with incomplete (IC) TME associated with increased rates of local recurrence relative to complete or near complete (NC) TME. Although TME grade serves as an endpoint in most rectal cancer trials, in protocols incorporating centralized review of TME specimens for quality assurance, discordance in grading and the management thereof has not been previously described. METHODS A phase 2 prospective transanal TME trial was conducted from 2017 to 2022 across 11 North American centers with TME quality as the primary study endpoint. QC measures included (1) training of site pathologists in TME protocols, (2) blinded grading of de-identified TME specimen photographs by central pathologists, and (3) reconciliation of major discordance before trial reporting. Cohen Kappa statistic was used to assess agreement in grading. RESULTS Overall agreement in grading of 100 TME specimens between site and central reviewer was rated as fair, (κ = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.10-0.61; P < 0.0001). Concordance was noted in 54%, with minor and major discordance in 32% and 14% of cases, respectively. Upon reconciliation, 13/14 (93%) major discordances were resolved. Pre versus postreconciliation rates of complete or NC and IC TME are 77%/16% and 7% versus 69%/21% and 10%. Reconciliation resulted in a major upgrade (IC-NC; N = 1) or major downgrade (NC/C-IC, N = 4) in 5 cases overall (5%). CONCLUSIONS A 14% rate of major discordance was observed in TME grading between the site and central reviewers. The resolution resulted in a major change in final TME grade in 5% of cases, which suggests that reported rates or TME completeness are likely overestimated in trials. QC through a central review of TME photographs and reconciliation of major discordances is strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Sylla
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Mariana Berho
- Executive Administration Florida, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL
| | - Dana Sands
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL
| | - Alison Ricardo
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Erin Moshier
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Elisabeth Hain
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Riva Letchinger
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - John Marks
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA
| | - Mark Whiteford
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgical Division, the Oregon Clinic Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR
| | - Elisabeth Mclemore
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Justin Maykel
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - Karim Alavi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - Karen Zaghiyan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sami Chadi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Scott Steele
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Alessio Pigazzi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Matthew Albert
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Advent Health Orlando, Orlando, FL
| | | | | | - Steven Wexner
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Garoufalia Z, Freund MR, Gefen R, Meyer R, DaSilva G, Weiss EG, Wexner SD. Does Completeness of the Mesorectal Excision Still Correlate With Local Recurrence? Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:898-904. [PMID: 36649177 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total mesorectal excision is the standard surgical procedure for rectal cancer treatment. Several studies have shown a close correlation between the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer and the completeness of the mesorectal specimen. OBJECTIVE To assess the correlation between macroscopic assessment of mesorectal excision and long-term oncological outcomes. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of an Institutional Review Board-approved database. SETTINGS Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Patients with rectal cancer who were operated on between March 2016 and October 2019 were classified into 3 groups based on the mesorectal specimen quality: complete, near complete, and incomplete. Only patients with a follow-up of ≥2 years and without signs of preoperative distant disease were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Relationship between total mesorectal excision and local and distant recurrence rates in patients with rectal cancer. RESULTS A total of 124 patients (35.5% females) were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 58.1 (SD 12) years and a mean BMI of 26.4 (SD 4.59) kg/m². Neoadjuvant chemoradiation was administered to 71% of patients, whereas 13.7% received total neoadjuvant therapy. Restorative procedures were performed in 107 patients (86.3%), whereas 17 patients (13.7%) underwent abdominoperineal resection. The majority of mesorectal excision specimens (87.09%) were complete or near complete. Local recurrence rates were 6.3% (1/16) in the incomplete and 7.4% (8/108) in the complete/near complete group ( p = 0.86). Metachronous distant metastases occurred in 6 patients (37.5%) in the incomplete group and in 24 patients (22.2%) in the complete/near complete group (p = 0.18). Thus, specimen quality did not appear to impact disease-free survival. LIMITATIONS Retrospective, single-center study with relatively short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In the era of a multidisciplinary approach and extensive use of neoadjuvant therapy, macroscopic completeness of total mesorectal excision may not be as valuable a prognosticator as in the past. Larger studies with longer follow-ups are needed to clarify these preliminary findings. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C129. LA INTEGRIDAD DE LA ESCISIN MESORRECTAL TODAVA SE CORRELACIONA CON LA RECURRENCIA LOCAL ANTECEDENTES:La escisión total desl mesorrecto es el estándar de oro para el tratamiento del cáncer de recto. Varios estudios han demostrado una estrecha correlación entre el pronóstico de los pacientes con cáncer de recto y la integridad espécimen mesorrectal.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la correlación entre la evaluación macroscópica de la escisión mesorrectal y los resultados oncológicos a largo plazo en pacientes con cáncer de recto.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos aprobada por el IRB.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se realizó en un centro de referencia terciario de una sola institución.PACIENTES:Todos los pacientes con cáncer de recto operados entre 3/2016-10/2019. Los pacientes se clasificaron en 3 grupos, según la calidad del espécimen mesorrectal: completo, casi completo e incompleto. Solo se incluyeron pacientes con seguimiento >2 años y sin signos de enfermedad a distancia preoperatoria.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Identificar la relación entre la escisión mesorrectal total y las tasas de recurrencia local y a distancia en pacientes con cáncer de recto.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 124 pacientes (35,5% mujeres) con una edad media de 58,1 años (DE 12) y un índice de masa corporal medio de 26,4 (DE 4,59). Se administró quimiorradiación neoadyuvante al 71% de los pacientes, mientras que el 13,7% recibió terapia neoadyuvante total. Se realizaron procedimientos de restauración en 107 pacientes (86,3%), mientras que 17 pacientes (13,7%) se sometieron a resección abdominoperineal. La mayoría (87,09%) de los especímenes de escisión mesorrectal fueron completas o casi completas. Las tasas de recurrencia local fueron 1/16 (6,3%) en el grupo incompleto y 8/108 (7,4%) en el grupo completo/casi completo ( p = 0,86). Se produjeron metástasis a distancia metacrónicas en 6 pacientes (37,5%) en el grupo incompleto y 24 (22,2%) en el grupo completo/casi completo ( p = 0,18). Por lo tanto, la calidad del espécimen no pareció afectar la supervivencia libre de enfermedad.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro con pequeño número de casos y seguimiento relativamente corto.CONCLUSIÓN:En la era de un enfoque multidisciplinario y el uso extensivo de la terapia neoadyuvante, la integridad macroscópica de la escisión total del mesorrecto, puede no ser un pronóstico tan valioso como en el pasado. Se necesitan estudios más amplios con períodos de seguimiento más prolongados para aclarar estos hallazgos preliminares. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C129 . (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Garoufalia
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | - Michael R Freund
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | - Rachel Gefen
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ryan Meyer
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | - Giovanna DaSilva
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | - Eric G Weiss
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grazzini G, Danti G, Chiti G, Giannessi C, Pradella S, Miele V. Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2104. [PMID: 37370997 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancers are often considered a distinct disease from colon cancers as their survival and management are different. Particularly, the risk for local recurrence (LR) is greater than in colon cancer. There are many factors predisposing to LR such as postoperative histopathological features or the mesorectal plane of surgical resection. In addition, the pattern of LR in rectal cancer has a prognostic significance and an important role in the choice of operative approach and. Therefore, an optimal follow up based on imaging is critical in rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to analyse the risk and the pattern of local recurrences in rectal cancer and to provide an overview of the role of imaging in early detection of LRs. We performed a literature review of studies published on Web of Science and MEDLINE up to January 2023. We also reviewed the current guidelines of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Although the timing and the modality of follow-up is not yet established, the guidelines usually recommend a time frame of 5 years post surgical resection of the rectum. Computed Tomography (CT) scans and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are the main imaging techniques recommended in the follow-up of these patients. PET-CT is not recommended by guidelines during post-operative surveillance and it is generally used for problem solving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Grazzini
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Giuditta Chiti
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Caterina Giannessi
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Silvia Pradella
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhao P, Zhen H, Zhao H, Huang Y, Cao B. Identification of hub genes and potential molecular mechanisms related to radiotherapy sensitivity in rectal cancer based on multiple datasets. J Transl Med 2023; 21:176. [PMID: 36879254 PMCID: PMC9987056 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04029-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy resistance is the main cause of low tumor regression for locally advanced rectum adenocarcinoma (READ). The biomarkers correlated to radiotherapy sensitivity and potential molecular mechanisms have not been completely elucidated. METHODS A mRNA expression profile and a gene expression dataset of READ (GSE35452) were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between radiotherapy responder and non-responder of READ were screened out. Gene ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis for DEGs were performed. Random survival forest analysis was used to identified hub genes by randomForestSRC package. Based on CIBERSORT algorithm, Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database, Gene set variation analysis (GSVA), enrichment analysis (GSEA), nomogram, motif enrichment and non-coding RNA network analyses, the associations between hub genes and immune cell infiltration, drug sensitivity, specific signaling pathways, prognosis prediction and TF - miRNA regulatory and ceRNA network were investigated. The expressions of hub genes in clinical samples were displayed with the online Human Protein Atlas (HPA). RESULTS In total, 544 up-regulated and 575 down-regulated DEGs in READ were enrolled. Among that, three hubs including PLAGL2, ZNF337 and ALG10 were identified. These three hub genes were significantly associated with tumor immune infiltration, different immune-related genes and sensitivity of chemotherapeutic drugs. Also, they were correlated with the expression of various disease-related genes. In addition, GSVA and GSEA analysis revealed that different expression levels of PLAGL2, ZNF337 and ALG10 affected various signaling pathways related to disease progression. A nomogram and calibration curves based on three hub genes showed excellent prognosis predictive performance. And then, a regulatory network of transcription factor (ZBTB6) - mRNA (PLAGL2) and a ceRNA network of miRNA (has-miR-133b) - lncRNA were established. Finally, the results from HPA online database demonstrated the protein expression levels of PLAGL2, ZNF337 and ALG10 varied widely in READ patients. CONCLUSION These findings indicated that up-regulation of PLAGL2, ZNF337 and ALG10 in READ associated with radiotherapy response and involved in multiple process of cellular biology in tumor. They might be potential predictive biomarkers for radiotherapy sensitivity and prognosis for READ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengfei Zhao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, P.R. China
| | - Hongchao Zhen
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.95 Yong An Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, P.R. China
| | - Hong Zhao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, P.R. China
| | - Yongjie Huang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, P.R. China
| | - Bangwei Cao
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.95 Yong An Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Celentano V, Adamina M, Spinelli A, Fleshner P, Pellino G, Mineccia M, Selvaggi F, Svrcek M, Tozer P, Espin-Basany E, Hancock L, Faiz O, Coffey CJ, Sampietro G. SupportiNg operAtive Photographic documentation in ileocolonic CROHN's disease surgery: The SNAPCROHN study. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:282-288. [PMID: 36109836 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are reported variations in the intraoperative management of Crohn's disease. This consensus statement aimed to develop a standardised protocol for photographic documentation of intraoperative findings and critical procedural steps in ileocolonic Crohn's disease surgery. METHODS Colorectal surgeons with a specialist interest in minimally invasive surgery and inflammatory bowel disease were invited as committee members to develop a survey on the use of photo-documentation in Crohn's disease surgery. A 15 item survey was developed on ethical considerations and applications of photo-documentation in audit and quality control, research, and training. RESULTS There was strong agreement on the potential application of intraoperative photo-documentation in Crohn's disease for training, research, quality control and tertiary referrals. Reviewers agreed that intraoperative staging required photo-documentation of strictures, skip lesions, perforations, fat wrapping and mesenteric disease. The necessary steps to be photo-documented were very specific to Crohn's disease surgery, such as views of anastomosis and strictureplasties, and extent of resection(s). CONCLUSIONS Our consensus statement identified several items for appropriate intraoperative photo-documentation in Crohn's disease surgery, to be used as an adjunct to accurate annotation of intraoperative findings and procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Celentano
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Phillip Fleshner
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universita' degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Michela Mineccia
- Division of General and Oncologic Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Selvaggi
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universita' degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Magali Svrcek
- Department of Pathology, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Phil Tozer
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Eloy Espin-Basany
- Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Hancock
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Calvin J Coffey
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.,Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Gianluca Sampietro
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Division of General and HPB Surgery, Rho Memorial Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shao SL, Li YK, Qin JC, Liu L. Comprehensive abdominal composition evaluation of rectal cancer patients with anastomotic leakage compared with body mass index-matched controls. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:1250-1259. [PMID: 36504512 PMCID: PMC9727572 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i11.1250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a fatal complication in patients with rectal cancer after undergoing anterior resection. However, the role of abdominal composition in the development of AL has not been studied.
AIM To investigate the relationship between abdominal composition and AL in rectal cancer patients after undergoing anterior resection.
METHODS A retrospective case-matched cohort study was conducted. Complete data for 78 patients with AL were acquired and this cohort was defined as the AL group. The controls were matched for the same sex and body mass index (± 1 kg/m2). Parameters related to abdominal composition including visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA), subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), skeletal muscle area (SMA), skeletal muscle index (SMI), abdominal circumference (AC), anterior to posterior diameter of abdominal cavity (APD), and transverse diameter of abdominal cavity (TD) were evaluated based on computed tomography (CT) images using the following Hounsfield Unit (HU) thresholds: SFA: -190 to -30, SMA: -29 to 150, and VFA: -150 to -20. The significance of abdominal composition-related parameters was quantified using feature importance analysis; an artificial intelligence method was used to evaluate the contribution of each included variable.
RESULTS Two thousand two hundred and thirty-eight rectal cancer patients who underwent anterior resection from 2010 to 2020 in a large academic hospital were investigated. Finally, 156 cases were enrolled in the study. Patients in the AL group showed longer operative time (225.03 ± 55.29 vs 207.17 ± 40.80, P = 0.023), lower levels of preoperative hemoglobin (123.32 ± 21.17 vs 132.60 ±1 6.31, P = 0.003) and albumin (38.34 ± 4.01 vs 40.52 ± 3.97, P = 0.001), larger tumor size (4.07 ± 1.36 vs 2.76 ± 1.28, P < 0.001), and later cancer stage (P < 0.001) compared to the controls. Patients who developed AL exhibited a larger VFA (125.68 ± 73.59 vs 97.03 ± 57.66, P = 0.008) and a smaller APD (77.30 ± 23.23 vs 92.09 ± 26.40, P < 0.001) and TD (22.90 ± 2.23 vs 24.21 ± 2.90, P = 0.002) compared to their matched controls. Feature importance analysis revealed that TD, APD, and VFA were the three most important abdominal composition-related features.
CONCLUSION AL patients have a higher visceral fat content and a narrower abdominal structure compared to matched controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng-Li Shao
- Department of Surgery, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
| | - Yang-Kun Li
- Department of Surgery, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
| | - Ji-Chao Qin
- Department of Surgery, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
| | - Lu Liu
- Department of Surgery, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Somashekhar SP, Saklani A, Dixit J, Kothari J, Nayak S, Sudheer OV, Dabas S, Goud J, Munikrishnan V, Sugoor P, Penumadu P, Ramachandra C, Mehendale S, Dahiya A. Clinical Robotic Surgery Association (India Chapter) and Indian rectal cancer expert group’s practical consensus statements for surgical management of localized and locally advanced rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1002530. [PMID: 36267970 PMCID: PMC9577482 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1002530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction There are standard treatment guidelines for the surgical management of rectal cancer, that are advocated by recognized physician societies. But, owing to disparities in access and affordability of various treatment options, there remains an unmet need for personalizing these international guidelines to Indian settings. Methods Clinical Robotic Surgery Association (CRSA) set up the Indian rectal cancer expert group, with a pre-defined selection criterion and comprised of the leading surgical oncologists and gastrointestinal surgeons managing rectal cancer in India. Following the constitution of the expert Group, members identified three areas of focus and 12 clinical questions. A thorough review of the literature was performed, and the evidence was graded as per the levels of evidence by Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. The consensus was built using the modified Delphi methodology of consensus development. A consensus statement was accepted only if ≥75% of the experts were in agreement. Results Using the results of the review of the literature and experts’ opinions; the expert group members drafted and agreed on the final consensus statements, and these were classified as “strong or weak”, based on the GRADE framework. Conclusion The expert group adapted international guidelines for the surgical management of localized and locally advanced rectal cancer to Indian settings. It will be vital to disseminate these to the wider surgical oncologists and gastrointestinal surgeons’ community in India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. P. Somashekhar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
- *Correspondence: S. P. Somashekhar,
| | - Avanish Saklani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jagannath Dixit
- Department of GI Surgery, HCG Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Jagdish Kothari
- Department of Surgical Oncology HCG Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Sandeep Nayak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fortis Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - O. V. Sudheer
- Department of GI Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Science, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Surender Dabas
- Department of Surgical Oncology, BL Kapur-Max Superspeciality Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Jagadishwar Goud
- Department of Surgical Oncology, AOI Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | | | - Pavan Sugoor
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | | | - C. Ramachandra
- Director and Head, Department of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Shilpa Mehendale
- Director and Head, Department of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Akhil Dahiya
- Department of Clinical and Medical Affairs, Intuitive Surgical, California, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sheng XQ, Wang HZ, Li S, Zhang YZ, Geng JH, Zhu XG, Quan JZ, Li YH, Cai Y, Wang WH. Consolidation chemotherapy with capecitabine after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in high-risk patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: Propensity score study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14:1711-1726. [PMID: 36187388 PMCID: PMC9516640 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i9.1711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effects of consolidation chemotherapy (CC) in neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have been explored. However, the optimal neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and surgery interval, regimen, and cycles of chemotherapy remains unclear.
AIM To evaluate the effects of one to two cycles of CC with capecitabine on high-risk patients with LARC without extending NCRT and surgery interval.
METHODS We retrospectively evaluated high-risk patients with LARC, who were defined as having at least one of the following factors by magnetic resonance imaging: depth of invasion beyond the muscularis propria of more than 5 mm (cT3c-cT3d), T4, meso-rectal fascia or extramural vascular invasion positive, and treatment date between January 2015 and July 2019 in our center. Patients were divided into the CC and non-CC group according to whether they received CC (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily from days 1 to 14 every 21 d) after NCRT. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) were used to balance the differences between the two groups. The main outcome was the complete response (CR) rate.
RESULTS A total of 265 patients were enrolled: 136 patients in the CC group and 129 patients in the non-CC group. The median interval was 70 d (range, 37-168). The CR rate was 24.3% and 16.3% (P = 0.107) in the CC and non-CC groups’ original samples, respectively. After PSM and IPTW, the CR rate in the CC group was higher than that in non-CC group (27.6% vs 16.2%, P = 0.045; 25.9% vs 16.3%, P = 0.045). The median follow-up was 39.8 mo (range, 2.9-74.8), and there were no differences in 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival nor overall survival in the original samples (73.2% vs 71.9%, P = 0.913; 92.3% vs 86.7%, P = 0.294), PSM (73.2% vs 73.5%, P = 0.865; 92.5% vs 89.3%, P = 0.612), and IPTW (73.8% vs 72.1%, P = 0.913; 92.4% vs 87.4%, P = 0.294). There was also no difference in grade 2 or higher acute toxicity during neoadjuvant therapy in the two groups (49.3% vs 53.5%, P = 0.492).
CONCLUSION One to two cycles of CC with capecitabine after NCRT was safe and increased the CR rate in high-risk LARC but failed to improve the long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-Qing Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Hong-Zhi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Shuai Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yang-Zi Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Jian-Hao Geng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Xiang-Gao Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Ji-Zhong Quan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jilin Guowen Hospital, Gongzhuling 136199, Jilin Province, China
| | - Yong-Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yong Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Wei-Hu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jiang WZ, Xu JM, Xing JD, Qiu HZ, Wang ZQ, Kang L, Deng HJ, Chen WP, Zhang QT, Du XH, Yang CK, Guo YC, Zhong M, Ye K, You J, Xu DB, Li XX, Xiong ZG, Tao KX, Ding KF, Zang WD, Feng Y, Pan ZZ, Wu AW, Huang F, Huang Y, Wei Y, Su XQ, Chi P. Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted vs Open Surgery for Patients With Low Rectal Cancer: The LASRE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:2796439. [PMID: 36107416 PMCID: PMC9478880 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
Importance The efficacy of laparoscopic vs open surgery for patients with low rectal cancer has not been established. Objective To compare the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic surgery vs open surgery for treatment of low rectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted in 22 tertiary hospitals across China. Patients scheduled for curative-intent resection of low rectal cancer were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to undergo laparoscopic or open surgery. Between November 2013 and June 2018, 1070 patients were randomized to laparoscopic (n = 712) or open (n = 358) surgery. The planned follow-up was 5 years. Data analysis was performed from April 2021 to March 2022. Interventions Eligible patients were randomized to receive either laparoscopic or open surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The short-term outcomes included pathologic outcomes, surgical outcomes, postoperative recovery, and 30-day postoperative complications and mortality. Results A total of 1039 patients (685 in laparoscopic and 354 in open surgery) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (median [range] age, 57 [20-75] years; 620 men [59.7%]; clinical TNM stage II/III disease in 659 patients). The rate of complete mesorectal excision was 85.3% (521 of 685) in the laparoscopic group vs 85.8% (266 of 354) in the open group (difference, -0.5%; 95% CI, -5.1% to 4.5%; P = .78). The rate of negative circumferential and distal resection margins was 98.2% (673 of 685) vs 99.7% (353 of 354) (difference, -1.5%; 95% CI, -2.8% to 0.0%; P = .09) and 99.4% (681 of 685) vs 100% (354 of 354) (difference, -0.6%; 95% CI, -1.5% to 0.5%; P = .36), respectively. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 13.0 vs 12.0 (difference, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.1-1.9; P = .39). The laparoscopic group had a higher rate of sphincter preservation (491 of 685 [71.7%] vs 230 of 354 [65.0%]; difference, 6.7%; 95% CI, 0.8%-12.8%; P = .03) and shorter duration of hospitalization (8.0 vs 9.0 days; difference, -1.0; 95% CI, -1.7 to -0.3; P = .008). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications rate between the 2 groups (89 of 685 [13.0%] vs 61 of 354 [17.2%]; difference, -4.2%; 95% CI, -9.1% to -0.3%; P = .07). No patient died within 30 days. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial of patients with low rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery performed by experienced surgeons was shown to provide pathologic outcomes comparable to open surgery, with a higher sphincter preservation rate and favorable postoperative recovery. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01899547.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Zhong Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Min Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia-Di Xing
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Hui-Zhong Qiu
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zi-Qiang Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Liang Kang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Jun Deng
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Ping Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qing-Tong Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiao-Hui Du
- Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Chun-Kang Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncological Surgery, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yin-Cong Guo
- Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China
| | - Ming Zhong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kai Ye
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Jun You
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncological Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Dong-Bo Xu
- Department of Colorectal & Anal Surgery, Longyan Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Xin-Xiang Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Guo Xiong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hubei Provincial Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Kai-Xiong Tao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ke-Feng Ding
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Dong Zang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncological Surgery, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yong Feng
- Department of Colorectal Oncological Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Zhi-Zhong Pan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ai-Wen Wu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncological Surgery, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ye Wei
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiang-Qian Su
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Pan Chi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ghadimi M, Rödel C, Hofheinz R, Flebbe H, Grade M. Multimodal Treatment of Rectal Cancer. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2022; 119:570-580. [PMID: 35791271 PMCID: PMC9743213 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is one of the three most common types of cancer in Germany. Approximately 30% of these cancers are located in the rectum, corresponding to about 18 000 new cases per year. METHODS This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed database, including current guidelines and recommendations. RESULTS Specialized imaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging, is essential for treatment planning. In very early stages of this disease, tumors without risk factors can be excised locally. Otherwise, radical surgical resection with lymphadenectomy remains the standard treatment, and can be performed either minimally invasive or open. At present, neoadjuvant treatment plans are evolving in the direction of total neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, recent studies investigate whether the improved efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy might now enable patients with a complete clinical remission to be spared from surgical resection (organ-preserving watch-and-wait strategy). CONCLUSION The treatment of rectal cancer is a prime example of an interdisciplinary, multimodal approach. In the past, the focus was mainly on improving oncologic outcomes; at present, increasing attention is being devoted to the patients' quality of life as well and the functional aspects of the various modes of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main
| | - Ralf Hofheinz
- Department of Medical Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg
| | - Hannah Flebbe
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen
| | - Marian Grade
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen,*Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Kinderchirurgie Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Celentano V, Tekkis P, Nordenvall C, Mills S, Spinelli A, Smart N, Selvaggi F, Warren O, Espin-Basany E, Kontovounisios C, Pellino G, Warusavitarne J, Hancock L, Myrelid P, Remzi F. Standardization of ileoanal J-pouch surgery technique: Quality assessment of minimally invasive ileoanal J-pouch surgery videos. Surgery 2022; 172:53-59. [PMID: 34980484 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileal pouch anal anastomosis is a complex procedure associated with significant morbidity, with several complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery leading to pouch failure. The aim of the study is to evaluate the heterogeneity surrounding the technique of ileoanal J-pouch surgery by assessing the safety and quality of published online peer-reviewed surgical videos. METHODS Ileal pouch anal anastomosis videos published on peer-reviewed surgical journals and video channels were edited and anonymized to demonstrate specific steps of the surgical procedure: mobilization and division of the rectum, formation of the ileoanal J-pouch reservoir, anastomosis, and lengthening techniques. The anonymized videos were presented to a group of reviewers with expertise in ileal pouch anal anastomosis blinded to the names and affiliations of the surgeons performing the procedure. Primary outcome was the rate of interobserver variability in the assessment of specific technical steps of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery procedure. Secondary outcome was the appropriateness of the use of surgical videos review as an assessment tool for ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery, measured as rate of reviewers being unable to answer for poor video quality. RESULTS In total, 29 video fragments were distributed, and 13 assessors completed a 60-item survey, organized in 7 major domains. The survey completion rate was 93.4%. Out of a total 729 answers, in 23 (3.2%) the reviewers indicated they were unable to comment due to poor video image, and in 48 (6.5%) were unable to comment due to the particular step not being shown in the procedure. The proportion of assessors rating rectal mobilization technically appropriate ranged from 30.7% to 92.3% and from 7.7% to 69.2% for safety. The level of rectal division was considered appropriate in 0 to 53.8% of the videos, whereas the stapling technique used for rectal division was appropriate in 0 to 70% of the videos. CONCLUSION Our study assessed published peer-reviewed videos on ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery and reported heterogeneity in the safety of the demonstrated techniques. Blind assessment of published peer-reviewed ileal pouch anal anastomosis videos reported a high rate of unsafe or inappropriate technique for rectal mobilization and transection in the reviewed videos, with fair interobserver agreement among reviewers. There is a need for consensus on what is considered safe and appropriate in ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery. Peer review of ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery videos could facilitate training and accreditation in this complex procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Celentano
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
| | - Paris Tekkis
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Caroline Nordenvall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sarah Mills
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Neil Smart
- Exeter Health Services, Research Unit, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, UK
| | - Francesco Selvaggi
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universita' degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy
| | - Oliver Warren
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Eloy Espin-Basany
- Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universita' degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy; Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Laura Hancock
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Par Myrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faulty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden; Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland Linköping, Sweden
| | - Feza Remzi
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY; NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Seow-En I, Tzu-Liang Chen W. Complete mesocolic excision with central venous ligation/D3 lymphadenectomy for colon cancer – A comprehensive review of the evidence. Surg Oncol 2022; 42:101755. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
20
|
Transanal versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in Male Patients with Low Tumor Location after Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2022; 2022:2387464. [PMID: 35265121 PMCID: PMC8898864 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2387464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Since Sylla and Lacy successfully reported the transanal total mesorectal excision in 2010, taTME was considered to have the potential to overcome some problematic laparoscopic cases in male, low advanced rectal cancer. However, the evidence is still lacking. This study compared the short and long outcomes of taTME with laTME in these “challenging” patients to explore the advantages of taTME among the patients. Method. After propensity score matching analysis, 106 patients were included in each group from 325 patients who met the including standard. Statistical analysis was used to compare the differences of perioperative outcomes, histopathological results, and survival results between taTME and laTME groups. Results. The mean time of pelvic operation in the taTME group was significantly shorter than in the laTME group (
mins vs
mins,
). The complication incidence rate and the rate of protective loop ileostomy in the taTME group were significantly lower than those in the laTME group (19.8% vs 38.7%,
and 70.8% vs 92.5%,
). In long-term result, there was no significant difference between the two groups for 3-year OS (87.3% vs 85.4%,
) or 3-year DFS (74.9% vs 70.1%,
). The 2-year cumulative local recurrence rate was similar between the two groups (1.1% vs 5.8%,
). Conclusion. This study demonstrated that taTME might reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, especially of anastomotic leakage in these “challenging” patients. taTME may be considered to have clear advantages for “challenging” patients.
Collapse
|
21
|
Feng Y, Luo J, Liu P, Zhu Y, Cheng G, Zheng L, Liu L. Programmed death-ligand 1 and mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway in locally advanced rectal cancer. Discov Oncol 2022; 13:10. [PMID: 35201501 PMCID: PMC8844341 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-022-00471-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS Between February 2012 and February 2018, 103 patients with LARC treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neoCRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) were included. PD-L1, mTOR and p-mTOR of pair-matched pre-neoCRT biopsies and post-neoCRT surgical tissue were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS The mean combined positive score (CPS), tumor proportion score (TPS) and immune cell score (IC) of pre-neoCRT were 2.24 (0-70), 1.87 (0-70) and 0.67 (0-10), respectively. The mean CPS, TPS and IC of post-neoCRT were 2.19 (0-80), 1.38 (0-80) and 1.60 (0-20), respectively. Significant difference was observed in terms of IC between pre-neoCRT and post-neoCRT (p = 0.010). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of the whole group was 62.4%. Multivariate analysis by Cox model indicated that pre-neoCRT TPS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.052, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.020-1.086, p = 0.001] and post-neoCRT CPS (HR 0.733, 95% CI 0.555-0.967, p = 0.028) were associated with DFS. In the 89 patients without pathological complete response, p-mTOR and IC were upregulated after neoCRT. CONCLUSIONS For patients with LARC treated by neoCRT and TME, p-mTOR and IC were upregulated after neoCRT. Pre-neoCRT TPS and post-neoCRT CPS were independent prognostic predictors of DFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanru Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 1, East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, China
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jialin Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 1, East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, China
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Peng Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 1, East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, China
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuan Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 1, East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, China
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Guoping Cheng
- Department of Pathology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Linfeng Zheng
- Department of Pathology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Luying Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 1, East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
How can surgical skills in laparoscopic colon surgery be objectively assessed?-a scoping review. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:1761-1774. [PMID: 34873653 PMCID: PMC8847271 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08914-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Background In laparoscopic colorectal surgery, higher technical skills have been associated with improved patient outcome. With the growing interest in laparoscopic techniques, pressure on surgeons and certifying bodies is mounting to ensure that operative procedures are performed safely and efficiently. The aim of the present review was to comprehensively identify tools for skill assessment in laparoscopic colon surgery and to assess their validity as reported in the literature. Methods A systematic search was conducted in EMBASE and PubMed/MEDLINE in May 2021 to identify studies examining technical skills assessment tools in laparoscopic colon surgery. Available information on validity evidence (content, response process, internal structure, relation to other variables, and consequences) was evaluated for all included tools. Results Fourteen assessment tools were identified, of which most were procedure-specific and video-based. Most tools reported moderate validity evidence. Commonly not reported were rater training, assessment correlation with variables other than training level, and validity reproducibility and reliability in external educational settings. Conclusion The results of this review show that several tools are available for evaluation of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery, but few authors present substantial validity for tool development and use. As we move towards the implementation of new techniques in laparoscopic colon surgery, it is imperative to establish validity before surgical skill assessment tools can be applied to new procedures and settings. Therefore, future studies ought to examine different aspects of tool validity, especially correlation with other variables, such as patient morbidity and pathological reports, which impact patient survival. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08914-z.
Collapse
|
23
|
Yang Y, Luo D, Zhang R, Cai S, Li Q, Li X. Tumor Regression Grade as a Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Colon Cancer Following Preoperative Chemotherapy. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 21:96-106. [PMID: 34895989 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic value of tumor regression grade (TRG) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy has been explored extensively. However, whether TRG is predictive of outcome in colon cancer following preoperative chemotherapy has not been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 276 colon cancer patients who had undergone preoperative chemotherapy and surgery in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center during the period March 2014 through November 2019 were recruited in this study. 113 (40.9%) and 163 (59.1%) patients were diagnosed with locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) and metastatic colon cancer (mCC) before preoperative chemotherapy, respectively. The TRG was divided into TRG0 (complete response), TRG1 (good response), TRG2 (moderate response), and TRG3 (poor response). RESULTS Of the 276 patients 4.0% were TRG0, 5.4% were TRG1, 29.3% were TRG2, 61.2% were TRG3. TRG0 and TRG1 or TRG0, TRG1 and TRG2 were combined to simplify analysis due to limited sample size. In entire cohort, the 3-year overall survival for TRG0-1, TRG2, and TRG3 groups were 80.0%, 68.8% and 43.3% (P = .003). In LACC cohort, TRG was not associated with patients' prognosis, which largely resulted from limited outcome events. In mCC cohort, the 3-year overall survival for TRG0-1, TRG2, and TRG3 groups were 74.3%, 62.8% to 28.1% (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that TRG was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in both entire cohort and mCC cohort (TRG3 vs. TRG0-2). CONCLUSION TRG is a prognostic factor in predicting long-term outcomes of mCC patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufei Yang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dakui Luo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruoxin Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sanjun Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingguo Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Xinxiang Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Akram W, Mitsakos AT. Colorectal Pathology in the Pelvis. J Gynecol Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1089/gyn.2021.0117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Warqaa Akram
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University. Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anastasios T. Mitsakos
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University. Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
What's the magic number? Impact of time to initiation of treatment for rectal cancer. Surgery 2021; 171:1185-1192. [PMID: 34565608 PMCID: PMC8940728 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND National guidelines, including the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer, recommend initiation of rectal cancer treatment within 60 days of diagnosis; however, the effect of timely treatment initiation on oncologic outcomes is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact on oncologic outcomes of initiation of rectal cancer treatment within 60 days of diagnosis. METHODS This was a retrospective review of stage II/III rectal cancer patients performed using the United States Rectal Cancer Consortium, a collaboration of 6 academic medical centers. Patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer who underwent radical resection between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018 were included. The primary exposure was treatment initiation, defined as either resection or initiation of chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, within 60 days of diagnosis. The primary outcome was disease recurrence, and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS A total of 1,031 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. Treatment was initiated within 60 days of diagnosis in 830 patients (80.5%) and after 60 days in 201 patients (20.3%). In multivariable logistic regression, older age, non-White race, and residence greater than 100 miles from the treatment center were significantly associated with delay in treatment beyond 60 days. In survival analysis, 167 patients (16.2%) experienced recurrent disease, and 127 patients (12.3%) died of any cause. In an adjusted model accounting for pathologic staging, treatment sequence, distance to care, age, comorbidities, treatment center, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, neither progression-free survival nor all-cause mortality was significantly associated with timely initiation of therapy with hazard ratios of 1.09 (0.70, 1.69) and 1.03 (0.63, 1.66), respectively. CONCLUSION This study found no difference in oncologic outcomes with initiation of treatment beyond 60 days.
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang X, Zheng Z, Yu Q, Ghareeb WM, Lu X, Huang Y, Huang S, Lin S, Chi P. Impact of Surgical Approach on Surgical Resection Quality in Mid- and Low Rectal Cancer, A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:699200. [PMID: 34458142 PMCID: PMC8385749 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.699200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim To evaluate the evidence concerning the quality of surgical resection in laparoscopic (LapTME), robotic (RobTME) and transanal (TaTME) total mesorectal excision for mid-/low rectal cancer. Methods A systematic literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was performed. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was utilized to compare surgical resection involved in these 3 surgical techniques by using ADDIS software. Rates of positive circumferential resection margins (CRMs) were the primary endpoint. Results A total of 34 articles, 2 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 32 non-RCTs, were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled data showed CRM positivity in 114 of 1763 LapTME procedures (6.5%), 54 of 1051 RobTME procedures (5.1%) and 60 of 1276 TaTME procedures (4.7%). There was no statistically significant difference among these 3 surgical approaches in terms of CRM involvement rates and all other surgical resection quality outcomes. The incomplete mesorectal excision rates were 9.6% (69/720) in the LapTME group, 1.9% (11/584) in the RobTME group and 5.6% (45/797) in the TaTME group. Pooled network analysis observed a higher but not statistically significant risk of incomplete mesorectum when comparing both LapTME with RobTME (OR = 1.99; 95% CI = 0.48-11.17) and LapTME with TaTME (OR = 1.90; 95% CI = 0.99-5.25). By comparison, RobTME was most likely to be ranked the best or second best in terms of CRM involvement, complete mesorectal excision, rate of distal resection margin (DRM) involvement and length of DRMs. In addition, RobTME achieved a greater mean tumor distance to the CRM than TaTME. It is worth noting that TaTME was most likely to be ranked the worst in terms of CRM involvement for intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer. Conclusion Overall, RobTME was most likely to be ranked the best in terms of the quality of surgical resection for the treatment of mid-/low rectal cancer. TaTME should be performed with caution in the treatment of low rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojie Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Zhifang Zheng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qian Yu
- Department of Pathology, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Waleed M Ghareeb
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xingrong Lu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shenghui Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shuangming Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Anal Surgery, Longyan First Hospital, Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Pan Chi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Li K, He X, Tong S, Zheng Y. Nerve plane: An optimal surgical plane for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery? Med Hypotheses 2021; 154:110657. [PMID: 34388537 DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2021.110657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Radical resection for rectal cancer with total mesorectal excision has been widely recognized in mid-low rectal cancer. Although such surgery reduced the tumor recurrence rate and improved the survival rate of patients, the rate of urinary and sexual dysfunction was high after rectal cancer surgery, which might be attributed to pelvic autonomic nerve injury. The present study found that the pelvic autonomic nerves never exist alone. These are always surrounded by tiny capillaries and adipose tissue and covered by a thin layer of membranous tissue, leading to a continuous plane that should be preserved pelvic autonomic nerve from thermal damage, ischemic injury, nerve stretching, and chemical factors produced by local inflammatory effects. However, the completeness of the continuous plane is easily damaged intraoperatively in routine total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer. Postoperative urinary and sexual dysfunction might be closely associated with the injury of continuous plane. Therefore, the continuous plane should be protected and considered as the optimal surgical plane for rectal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiaobo He
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Shilun Tong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yongbin Zheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Edwards GC, Martin RL, Samuels LR, Wyman K, Bailey CE, Kiernan CM, Snyder RA, Dittus RS, Roumie CL. Association of Adherence to Quality Metrics with Recurrence or Mortality among Veterans with Colorectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:2055-2064. [PMID: 33169321 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04804-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Comprehensive Cancer Network has defined metrics for colorectal cancer; however, the association of metric adherence with patient clinical outcomes remains underexplored. The study aim was to evaluate the association of National Comprehensive Cancer Network metric adherence with recurrence and mortality in Veterans with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS Veterans with stage I-III colorectal cancer who underwent non-emergent resection from 2001 to 2015 at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center were included. The primary predictor was completion of eligible National Comprehensive Cancer Network metrics. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrence or all-cause death in three phases of care: surgical (up to 6 months after resection), treatment (6-18 months after resection), and surveillance (18 months-3 years after resection). Hazard ratios were estimated via Cox proportional hazards regression in a propensity score-weighted cohort. RESULTS A total of 1107 electronic medical records of patients undergoing colorectal surgery were reviewed, and 379 patients were included (301 colon and 78 rectal cancer). In the surgical phase, the weighted analysis yielded a hazard ratio of 0.37 (95% confidence interval 0.12-1.13) for metric-adherent patients compared with non-adherent patients. In the treatment and surveillance phases, the hazard ratios for metric-adherent care were 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.25-1.85) and 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.31-2.68), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline metric adherence was associated with a lower rate of recurrence and death in the surgical phase of care among stage I-III patients with resected colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen C Edwards
- Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center & Tennessee Valley Healthcare System - Veterans Health Administration, Medical Center North, Suite CCC-4312, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN, 37232-2730, USA. .,Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System - Veterans Health Administration, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Richard L Martin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center & Tennessee Valley Healthcare System - Veterans Health Administration, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lauren R Samuels
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System - Veterans Health Administration, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kenneth Wyman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center & Tennessee Valley Healthcare System - Veterans Health Administration, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Christina E Bailey
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Colleen M Kiernan
- Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center & Tennessee Valley Healthcare System - Veterans Health Administration, Medical Center North, Suite CCC-4312, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN, 37232-2730, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Departments of Surgery and Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Robert S Dittus
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System - Veterans Health Administration, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Christianne L Roumie
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System - Veterans Health Administration, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
With the changing lifestyle and the acceleration of aging in the Chinese population, the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) have risen in the last decades. On the contrary, the incidence and mortality of CRC have continued to decline in the USA since the 1980s, which is mainly attributed to early screening and standardized diagnosis and treatment. Rectal cancer accounts for the largest proportion of CRC in China, and its treatment regimens are complex. At present, surgical treatment is still the most important treatment for rectal cancer. Since the first Chinese guideline for diagnosis and treatment of CRC was issued in 2010, the fourth version has been revised in 2020. These guidelines have greatly promoted the standardization and internationalization of CRC diagnosis and treatment in China. And with the development of comprehensive treatment methods such as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, the post-operative quality of life and prognosis of patients with rectal cancer have improved. We believe that the inflection point of the rising incidence and mortality of rectal cancer will appear in the near future in China. This article reviewed the current status and research progress on surgical therapy of rectal cancer in China.
Collapse
|
30
|
Conroy T, Bosset JF, Etienne PL, Rio E, François É, Mesgouez-Nebout N, Vendrely V, Artignan X, Bouché O, Gargot D, Boige V, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Louvet C, Morand C, de la Fouchardière C, Lamfichekh N, Juzyna B, Jouffroy-Zeller C, Rullier E, Marchal F, Gourgou S, Castan F, Borg C. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:702-715. [PMID: 33862000 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00079-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 486] [Impact Index Per Article: 162.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy controls local disease, but distant metastases remain common. We aimed to assess whether administering neoadjuvant chemotherapy before preoperative chemoradiotherapy could reduce the risk of distant recurrences. METHODS We did a phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised trial at 35 hospitals in France. Eligible patients were adults aged 18-75 years and had newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven, rectal adenocarcinoma staged cT3 or cT4 M0, with a WHO performance status of 0-1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group or standard-of-care group, using an independent web-based system by minimisation method stratified by centre, extramural extension of the tumour into perirectal fat according to MRI, tumour location, and stage. Investigators and participants were not masked to treatment allocation. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 intravenously every 14 days for 6 cycles), chemoradiotherapy (50 Gy during 5 weeks and 800 mg/m2 concurrent oral capecitabine twice daily for 5 days per week), total mesorectal excision, and adjuvant chemotherapy (3 months of modified FOLFOX6 [intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and leucovorin 400 mg/m2, followed by intravenous 400 mg/m2 fluorouracil bolus and then continuous infusion at a dose of 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h every 14 days for six cycles] or capecitabine [1250 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days]). The standard-of-care group received chemoradiotherapy, total mesorectal excision, and adjuvant chemotherapy (for 6 months). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population at 3 years. Safety analyses were done on treated patients. This trial was registered with EudraCT (2011-004406-25) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01804790) and is now complete. FINDINGS Between June 5, 2012, and June 26, 2017, 461 patients were randomly assigned to either the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (n=231) or the standard-of-care group (n=230). At a median follow-up of 46·5 months (IQR 35·4-61·6), 3-year disease-free survival rates were 76% (95% CI 69-81) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 69% (62-74) in the standard-of-care group (stratified hazard ratio 0·69, 95% CI 0·49-0·97; p=0·034). During neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (38 [17%] of 225 patients) and diarrhoea (25 [11%] of 226). During chemoradiotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse event was lymphopenia (59 [28%] of 212 in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group vs 67 [30%] of 226 patients in the standard-of-care group). During adjuvant chemotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were lymphopenia (18 [11%] of 161 in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group vs 42 [27%] of 155 in the standard-of-care group), neutropenia (nine [6%] of 161 vs 28 [18%] of 155), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (19 [12%] of 162 vs 32 [21%] of 155). Serious adverse events occurred in 63 (27%) of 231 participants in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 50 (22%) of 230 patients in the standard-of-care group (p=0·167), during the whole treatment period. During adjuvant therapy, serious adverse events occurred in 18 (11%) of 163 participants in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 36 (23%) of 158 patients in the standard-of-care group (p=0·0049). Treatment-related deaths occurred in one (<1%) of 226 patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (sudden death) and two (1%) of 227 patients in the standard-of-care group (one sudden death and one myocardial infarction). INTERPRETATION Intensification of chemotherapy using FOLFIRINOX before preoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly improved outcomes compared with preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT3 or cT4 M0 rectal cancer. The significantly improved disease-free survival in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and the decreased neurotoxicity indicates that the perioperative approach is more efficient and better tolerated than adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, the PRODIGE 23 results might change clinical practice. FUNDING Institut National du Cancer, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and R&D Unicancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Conroy
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France; APEMAC, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
| | - Jean-François Bosset
- Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Montbéliard, France; University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | | | - Emmanuel Rio
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-Site René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | | | - Véronique Vendrely
- Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Pessac, France
| | - Xavier Artignan
- Centre Hospitalier Privé Saint-Grégoire, Saint-Grégoire, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Clotilde Morand
- Centre Hospitalier Départemental, Site de la Roche-sur-Yon, La Roche-sur-Yon, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Eric Rullier
- Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Pessac, France
| | - Frédéric Marchal
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Sophie Gourgou
- Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Florence Castan
- Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Christophe Borg
- Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Montbéliard, France; University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the frequency, nature, and severity of intraoperative adverse near miss events within advanced laparoscopic surgery and report any associated clinical impact. BACKGROUND Despite implementation of surgical safety initiatives, the intraoperative period is poorly documented with evidence of underreporting. Near miss analyses are undertaken in high-risk industries but not in surgical practice. METHODS Case video and data from 2 laparoscopic total mesorectal excision randomized controlled trials were analyzed (ALaCaRT ACTRN12609000663257, 2D3D ISRCTN59485808). Intraoperative adverse events were identified and categorized using the observational clinical human reliability analysis technique. The EAES classification was applied by 2 blinded assessors. EAES grade 1 events (nonconsequential error, no damage, or need for correction) were considered near misses. Associated clinical impact was assessed with early morbidity and histopathology outcomes. RESULTS One hundred seventy-five cases contained 1113 error events. Six hundred ninety-eight (62.7%) were near misses (median 3, IQR 2-5, range 0-15) with excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability (κ=0.86, 95% CI 0.83-0.89, P < 0.001 and κ=0.88, 95% CI 0.85-0.9, P < 0.001 respectively). Significantly more near misses were seen in patients who developed early complications (4 (3-6) vs. 3 (2-4), P < 0.001). Higher numbers of near misses were seen in patients with more numerous (P = 0.002) and more serious early complications (P = 0.003). Cases containing major intraoperative adverse events contained significantly more near misses (5 (3-7) vs. 3 (2-5), P < 0.001) with a major event observed for every 19.4 near misses. CONCLUSION Intraoperative adverse events and near misses can be reliably and objectively captured in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Near misses are commonplace and closely associated with morbidity outcomes.
Collapse
|
32
|
Klein MF, Seiersen M, Bulut O, Bech-Knudsen F, Jansen JE, Gögenur I. Short-term outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in Denmark - a prospective multicentre study. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:834-842. [PMID: 33226722 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term surgical and oncological outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer during the implementation phase of this procedure in Denmark. METHOD This is a retrospective review of prospectively recorded data. Registration was initiated by the Scientific Council of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG.dk) in order to assess the quality of care during the implementation of TaTME. Pre-, intra- and postoperative data including early recurrences were recorded at the operating centres. RESULTS From August 2016 to April 2019, 115 TaTME procedures were registered. Patients were predominantly male (74%) with mid-rectal (88%) tumours. The level of surgical complications was comparable to previous nationwide results. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 6/109 (5.5%). One urethral injury occurred. The plane of dissection was mesorectal in 60% of cases, intramesorectal in 28% and muscularis in 12%. Nonmicroradicality was seen in 8% (R1, 6%; R2, 2%). Four local recurrences occurred after a median of 23 months of follow-up. One of these was multifocal. CONCLUSION In an implementation phase where patient selection is expected, surgical and oncological results after TaTME were comparable to those of other approaches reported in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mads Falk Klein
- Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark.,Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG.dk, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Seiersen
- Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Koege, Koege, Denmark
| | - Orhan Bulut
- Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Flemming Bech-Knudsen
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Centre South, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Jens Erik Jansen
- Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Ismail Gögenur
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG.dk, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Centre for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital Koege, Koege, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chen HY, Feng LL, Li M, Ju HQ, Ding Y, Lan M, Song SM, Han WD, Yu L, Wei MB, Pang XL, He F, Liu S, Zheng J, Ma Y, Lin CY, Lan P, Huang MJ, Zou YF, Yang ZL, Wang T, Lang JY, Orangio GR, Poylin V, Ajani JA, Wang WH, Wan XB. College of American Pathologists Tumor Regression Grading System for Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Oncologist 2021; 26:e780-e793. [PMID: 33543577 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Rectal Cancer Guideline Panel recommends American Joint Committee of Cancer and College of American Pathologists (AJCC/CAP) tumor regression grading (TRG) system to evaluate pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Yet, the clinical significance of the AJCC/CAP TRG system has not been fully defined. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a multicenter, retrospectively recruited, and prospectively maintained cohort study. Patients with LARC from one institution formed the discovery set, and cases from external independent institutions formed a validation set to verify the findings from discovery set. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox regression model. RESULTS The discovery set (940 cases) found, and the validation set (2,156 cases) further confirmed, that inferior AJCC/CAP TRG categories were closely /ccorrelated with unfavorable survival (OS, DFS, LRFS, and DMFS) and higher risk of disease progression (death, accumulative relapse, local recurrence, and distant metastasis) (all p < .05). Significantly, pairwise comparison revealed that any two of four TRG categories had the distinguished survival and risk of disease progression. After propensity score matching, AJCC/CAP TRG0 category (pathological complete response) patients treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy displayed similar survival of OS, DFS, LRFS, and DMFS (all p > .05). For AJCC/CAP TRG1-3 cases, adjuvant chemotherapy treatment significantly improved 3-year OS (90.2% vs. 84.6%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated the AJCC/CAP TRG system was an independent prognostic surrogate. CONCLUSION AJCC/CAP TRG system, an accurate prognostic surrogate, appears ideal for further strategizing adjuvant chemotherapy for LARC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends the American Joint Committee of Cancer and College of American Pathologists (AJCC/CAP) tumor regression grading (TRG) four-category system to evaluate the pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer; however, the clinical significance of the AJCC/CAP TRG system has not yet been clearly addressed. This study found, for the first time, that any two of four AJCC/CAP TRG categories had the distinguished long-term survival outcome. Importantly, adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the 3-year overall survival for AJCC/CAP TRG1-3 category patients but not for AJCC/CAP TRG0 category patients. Thus, AJCC/CAP TRG system, an accurate surrogate of long-term survival outcome, is useful in guiding adjuvant chemotherapy management for rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Yang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Li-Li Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital/ National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Huai-Qiang Ju
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Mei Lan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Shu-Mei Song
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wei-Dong Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of College of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Yu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of College of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming-Biao Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Lin Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Fang He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuai Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chu-Yang Lin
- Department of Clinical Skills Training Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ping Lan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Mei-Jin Huang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi-Feng Zou
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Zu-Li Yang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Ting Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin-Yi Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Guy R Orangio
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, LSU Department of Surgery, LSU School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Vitaliy Poylin
- Division of Colon & Rectum Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center of Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wei-Hu Wang
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiang-Bo Wan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Luo Y, Li R, Wu D, Zeng J, Wang J, Chen X, Huang C, Li Y, Yao X. Long-term oncological outcomes of low anterior resection for rectal cancer with and without preservation of the left colic artery: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:171. [PMID: 33596860 PMCID: PMC7890901 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07848-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is uncertainty in the literature about preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during low anterior resection for rectal cancer. We analyzed the effect of preserving the LCA on long-term oncological outcomes. Methods We retrospectively collected clinicopathological and follow-up details of patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer in the General Surgery Department of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, from January 2014 to December 2015. Cases were divided into low ligation (LL), LCA preserved, or high ligation (HL), LCA not preserved, of the inferior mesenteric artery. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared between the two groups. Results Altogether, there were 221 and 295 cases in the LL group and HL groups, respectively. Operating time in the LL group was significantly longer than in the HL group (224.7 vs. 211.7 min, p = 0.039). Postoperative 30-day mortality, early complications including anastomotic leakage showed no significant differences between the LL and HL groups (postoperative 30-day mortality, 0.9% LL, 1.4% HL, p = 0.884; early complications, 41.2% LL, 38.3% HL, p = 0.509; anastomotic leakage 8.6% LL, 13.2% HL, p = 0.100). The median follow-up periods were 51.4 (7–61) months in the LL group and 51.2 (8–61) months in the HL group. During follow-up, the percentages of patients who died, had local recurrence, or had metastases were 39.8, 7.7, and 38.5%, respectively, in the LL group and 39, 8.5, and 40%, respectively, in the HL group; these differences were not significant (all p > 0.05). The 5-year OS and DFS were 69.6 and 59.6% in the LL group, respectively, and 69.1 and 56.2% in the HL group, respectively; these differences were not significant (all p > 0.05). After stratification by tumor-node-metastasis stage, the difference between the 5-year OS and DFS for stages I, II, and III cancer were not significant (all p > 0.05). Conclusions The long-term oncological outcomes of LL group are comparable with HL group. LL cannot be supported due to the absence of lower complication rates and the longer operating times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuwen Luo
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510082, People's Republic of China.,Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Rongjiang Li
- Department of General Surgery, Baoan Central Hospital, The Fifth Affiliated hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, People's Republic of China
| | - Deqing Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Zeng
- Department of General Surgery, Baoan Central Hospital, The Fifth Affiliated hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, People's Republic of China
| | - Junjiang Wang
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510082, People's Republic of China.,Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Xianzhe Chen
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510082, People's Republic of China.,Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Chengzhi Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.,School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong Li
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510082, People's Republic of China.,Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.,School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, People's Republic of China.,School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, People's Republic of China
| | - Xueqing Yao
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510082, People's Republic of China. .,Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China. .,School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, People's Republic of China. .,School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Curtis NJ, Foster JD, Miskovic D, Brown CSB, Hewett PJ, Abbott S, Hanna GB, Stevenson ARL, Francis NK. Association of Surgical Skill Assessment With Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Surgery. JAMA Surg 2021; 155:590-598. [PMID: 32374371 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Complex surgical interventions are inherently prone to variation yet they are not objectively measured. The reasons for outcome differences following cancer surgery are unclear. Objective To quantify surgical skill within advanced laparoscopic procedures and its association with histopathological and clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants This analysis of data and video from the Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of Rectum (ALaCaRT) and 2-dimensional/3-dimensional (2D3D) multicenter randomized laparoscopic total mesorectal excision trials, which were conducted at 28 centers in Australia, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand, was performed from 2018 to 2019 and included 176 patients with clinical T1 to T3 rectal adenocarcinoma 15 cm or less from the anal verge. Case videos underwent blinded objective analysis using a bespoke performance assessment tool developed with a 62-international expert Delphi exercise and workshop, interview, and pilot phases. Interventions Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision undertaken with curative intent by 34 credentialed surgeons. Main Outcomes and Measures Histopathological (plane of mesorectal dissection, ALaCaRT composite end point success [mesorectal fascial plane, circumferential margin, ≥1 mm; distal margin, ≥1 mm]) and 30-day morbidity. End points were analyzed using surgeon quartiles defined by tool scores. Results The laparoscopic total mesorectal excision performance tool was produced and shown to be reliable and valid for the specialist level (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.889; 95% CI, 0.832-0.926; P < .001). A substantial variation in tool scores was recorded (range, 25-48). Scores were associated with the number of intraoperative errors, plane of mesorectal dissection, and short-term patient morbidity, including the number and severity of complications. Upper quartile-scoring surgeons obtained excellent results compared with the lower quartile (mesorectal fascial plane: 93% vs 59%; number needed to treat [NNT], 2.9, P = .002; ALaCaRT end point success, 83% vs 58%; NNT, 4; P = .03; 30-day morbidity, 23% vs 50%; NNT, 3.7; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance Intraoperative surgical skill can be objectively and reliably measured in complex cancer interventions. Substantial variation in technical performance among credentialed surgeons is seen and significantly associated with clinical and pathological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan J Curtis
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England.,Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Yeovil, England
| | - Jake D Foster
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England.,Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Yeovil, England
| | | | - Chris S B Brown
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter J Hewett
- Department of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sarah Abbott
- Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - George B Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
| | - Andrew R L Stevenson
- Faculty of Medical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nader K Francis
- Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Yeovil, England.,University College London, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Neumann PA, Berlet MW, Friess H. Surgical oncology in the age of multimodality therapy for cancer of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 21:511-522. [PMID: 33355020 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1868991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To date, all efforts to fight gastrointestinal cancer, regardless of its origin and entity, have resulted in complex therapeutic regimens involving a combination of systemic therapy, radiation therapy and surgery. It is generally accepted across all disciplines that not one, but the combination and the proper timing of all modalities result in the best oncologic outcome. AREAS COVERED Here, we provide insight into the current and future value of multimodal therapeutic approaches for upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer. Various aspects of treatment as well as open questions regarding indication and timing of multimodal strategies are addressed in this review. EXPERT OPINION In order to further improve the survival and quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal tumors in the future, scientifically proven multimodal therapy concepts are needed first and foremost. In addition, markers are pivotal to assign individual patients to a specific concept and to monitor the success of therapy. The main question is in which situation a neoadjuvant, perioperative or adjuvant radio-, chemo- or immunotherapy is superior. In fact, almost every curatively intended concept still contains surgical resection. Thus, improvement in surgical technique is also critical for multimodality concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
LARS is Associated with Lower Anastomoses, but not with the Transanal Approach in Patients Undergoing Rectal Cancer Resection. World J Surg 2020; 45:873-879. [PMID: 33301048 PMCID: PMC7851016 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05876-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a defecation disorder that frequently occurs after a low anterior resection (LAR) with a total mesorectal excision (TME). The transanal (ta) TME for low rectal pathologies could potentially overcome some of the difficulties encountered with the abdominal approach in a narrow pelvis. However, the impact of the transanal approach on functional outcomes remains unknown. Here, we investigated the effect of the taTME approach on functional outcomes by comparing LARS scores between the LAR and taTME approaches in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 80 patients (n = 40 LAR-TME, n = 40 taTME) with rectal adenocarcinoma. We reviewed medical charts to obtain LARS scores 6 months after the rectal resection or a reversal of the protective ileostomy. RESULTS At the 6-month follow-up, 80% of patients exhibited LARS symptoms (44% minor LARS and 36% major LARS). LARS scores were not significantly associated with the T-stage, N-stage, or neo-adjuvant radiotherapy. The mean distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge was 4.0 ± 2.0 cm. The taTME group had significantly lower anastomoses compared with the LAR-TME group (median 4.0 cm [IQR1.8] vs. median 5.0 cm [IQR 2.0], p < 0.001). Univariable analysis revealed significantly higher LARS scores in the taTME group compared with the LAR-TME group (median LARS scores: 29 vs. 25, p = 0.040). However, multivariable regression analysis, adjusting for neo-adjuvant treatment, anastomosis distance from the anal verge, anastomotic leak rate, and body mass index, revealed no significant effect of taTME on the LARS score (adjusted regression coefficient: - 2.147, 95%CI: - 2.130 to 6.169, p = 0.359). We also found a significant correlation between LARS scores and the distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (regression coefficient: - 1.145, 95%CI: - 2.149 to - 1.141, p = 0.026). CONCLUSION Fifty percentage of patients in this cohort exhibited some LARS symptoms after a mid- or low-rectal cancer resection. As previously described, LARS scores were negatively correlated with the distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge. TaTME was after adjustment for the height of the anastomosis not associated with higher LARS at 6 months when compared with LAR-TME.
Collapse
|
38
|
Kim JC, Han JS, Lee JL, Kim CW, Yoon YS, Park SH, Kim J. Re-evaluation of possible vulnerable sites in the lateral pelvic cavity to local recurrence during robot-assisted total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:5450-5460. [PMID: 32970206 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08032-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite mechanical and technical improvements in laparoscopic and robot-assisted (LAR) rectal cancer procedures, the absence of prognostic disparities among various approaches cannot improve the quality of TME. The present study re-evaluated robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) procedures to determine whether these procedures may reveal technical faults that may increase the rate of local recurrence (LR). METHODS This study enrolled 886 consecutive patients with rectal cancer, who underwent curative robot-assisted LAR at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between July 2010 and August 2017 (the first vs second period; n = 399 vs 487). The quality of TME and lateral pelvic mesorectal excision (LPME) were analyzed, as were LR rates and survival outcomes. RESULTS Complete TME and LPME were achieved in 89.2% and 80.1% of these patients, respectively, with ≤ 1% having incomplete TME excluding intramesorectal excision. LR rates were 13.5 and 14.5 times higher in patients with incomplete TME and LPME, respectively, than in patients with complete TME and LPME (14.8% vs 1.1% and 8.7% vs 0.6%; p < 0.001 each by univariate analyses). Multivariate analyses showed that defective LPME was independently associated with incomplete TME and vice versa (p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that defective LPME was independently correlated with reduced 5-year disease-free survival rate (hazard ratio, 1.563; 95% confidence interval, 1.052-2.323; p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS LR in rectal cancer patients was largely due to incomplete LPME, which was significantly associated with incomplete TME. Complete LPME may enhance the likelihood of complete TME, reducing LR rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Cheon Kim
- Department of Surgery and Institute of Innovative Cancer Research, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro-43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
| | - Jin Su Han
- Department of Surgery and Institute of Innovative Cancer Research, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro-43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Jong Lyul Lee
- Department of Surgery and Institute of Innovative Cancer Research, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro-43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Chan Wook Kim
- Department of Surgery and Institute of Innovative Cancer Research, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro-43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Yong Sik Yoon
- Department of Surgery and Institute of Innovative Cancer Research, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro-43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Sung Ho Park
- Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jihun Kim
- Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
He F, Yu L, Ding Y, Li ZH, Wang J, Zheng J, Chen HY, Liu S, Pang XL, Ajani JA, Wan XB. Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer. Cancer Sci 2020; 111:4205-4217. [PMID: 32860448 PMCID: PMC7648035 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard regimen for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, whether and to which extent neoadjuvant radiotherapy could be removed from nCRT for patients with LARC is still unclear. This was a multicenter, retrospectively recruited, prospectively maintained cohort study. A propensity score matching model was employed to minimize potential confounding factors between subgroup patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or nCRT. Overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival (DFS), local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) were assessed between subgroup patients by Kaplan‐Meier analysis, log‐rank test, and Cox regression model. In total, 3233 consecutive patients, consist of 571 nCT and 2662 nCRT‐treated cases, were included. After propensity score matching (1:4), 565 nCT‐treated patients were matched to 1852 nCRT‐treated patients. Compared with nCT, nCRT treatment indeed decreased 3‐y local recurrence (10.0% vs 6.6%, P = .026), but had no impact on OS, DFS and DMFS (all P > .05) for LARC. Stratified analysis further confirmed that nCRT treatment was associated with higher 3‐y LRFS and 3‐y DFS than nCT treatment for baseline high‐risk subgroup (cT4, cN+, and cIII stage) patients (all P < .05). Conversely, for the baseline low‐risk subgroup patients (cT3, cN0, and cII stage), nCRT and nCT treatment had similar 3‐y OS, LRFS, DFS, and DMFS (all P > .05). The administration of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for LARC patients might be determined by baseline risk classification, the high‐risk individuals could be delivered while low‐risk patients might be omitted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Yu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhen-Hui Li
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jian Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Yang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuai Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Lin Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiang-Bo Wan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Oncological Outcomes of Initial 178 Cases. Indian J Surg Oncol 2020; 11:653-661. [PMID: 33281405 PMCID: PMC7714805 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-020-01212-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Emerging techniques in minimally invasive rectal resection include robotic total mesorectal excision (R-TME). The Da Vinci Surgical System offers precise dissection in narrow and deep confined spaces and is gaining increasing acceptance during recent times. The aim of this study is to analyse our initial experience of R-TME with Da Vinci Xi platform in terms of perioperative and oncological outcomes in the context of data from recently published randomised ROLARR trial amongst minimally invasive novice surgeons. Patients who underwent R-TME or tumour specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer between May 2016 and November 2019 were identified from a prospectively maintained single institution colorectal database. Demographic, clinical-pathological and short-term oncological outcomes were analysed. Of the 178 patients, 117 (65.7%) and 31 (17.4%) patients had lower and mid third rectal cancer. Most of the tumours were locally advanced, cT3–T4: 138 (77.5%). One hundred/178 (56.2%) underwent sphincter preserving TME. Eighty-seven (48.8%) were grade II adenocarcinoma. Nonmucinous adenocarcinoma was the predominant histology, 138 (78.4%). One hundred one cases (56.7%) were pT3. The mean number of lymph node yield was 13 ± 5. Distal resection margin and circumferential resection margin were positive in 2 (1.12%), 12 cases (6.74%) respectively. Eleven cases (6.7%) had to be converted to open TME. Mean blood loss and duration of surgery was 170 ± 60 ml and 286 ± 45 min respectively. Five percent cases had an anastomotic leak. Grade IIIa–IIIb Clavien Dindo (CD) morbidity score was reported to be in 12 (6.75%) and 10 (5.61%) cases. Median length of hospitalisation was 7 days (range 4–14 days). Perioperative and pathologic outcomes following robotic rectal resection is associated with good short-term oncological outcomes and is safe, effective, and reproducible by a minimally invasive novice surgeon.
Collapse
|
41
|
Waters GS, Gardner EM. Colorectal Cancer Imaging and Management: A Surgeon's Perspective. Semin Roentgenol 2020; 56:158-163. [PMID: 33858642 DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2020.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
42
|
de Lacy FB, Roodbeen SX, Ríos J, van Laarhoven J, Otero-Piñeiro A, Bravo R, Visser T, van Poppel R, Valverde S, Hompes R, Sietses C, Castells A, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Lacy AM. Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:677. [PMID: 32689968 PMCID: PMC7372845 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07171-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For patients with mid and distal rectal cancer, robust evidence on long-term outcome and causal treatment effects of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is lacking. This multicentre retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether TaTME reduces locoregional recurrence rate compared to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME). Methods Consecutive patients with rectal cancer within 12 cm from the anal verge and clinical stage II-III were selected from three institutional databases. Outcome after TaTME (Nov 2011 - Feb 2018) was compared to a historical cohort of patients treated with LapTME (Jan 2000 - Feb 2018) using the inverse probability of treatment weights method. The primary endpoint was three-year locoregional recurrence. Results A total of 710 patients were analysed, 344 in the TaTME group and 366 in the LapTME group. At 3 years, cumulative locoregional recurrence rates were 3.6% (95% CI, 1.1–6.1) in the TaTME group and 9.6% (95% CI, 6.5–12.7) in the LapTME group (HR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.23–0.69; p = 0.001). Three-year cumulative disease-free survival rates were 74.3% (95% CI, 68.8–79.8) and 68.6% (95% CI, 63.7–73.5) (HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65–1.02; p = 0.078) and three-year overall survival 87.2% (95% CI, 82.7–91.7) and 82.2% (95% CI, 78.0–86.2) (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53–1.03; p = 0.077), respectively. In patients who underwent sphincter preservation procedures, TaTME was associated with a significantly better disease-free survival (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62–0.98; p = 0.033). Conclusions These findings suggest that TaTME may improve locoregional recurrence and disease-free survival rates among patients with mid and distal locally advanced rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F B de Lacy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| | - S X Roodbeen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Ríos
- Medical Statistics Core Facility, August Pi and Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS); Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - J van Laarhoven
- Department of General Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - A Otero-Piñeiro
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - R Bravo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - T Visser
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - R van Poppel
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - S Valverde
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - R Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - A Castells
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - W A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A M Lacy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Krizzuk D, Yellinek S, Parlade A, Liang H, Dasilva G, Wexner SD. A simple difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:1137-1143. [PMID: 32666360 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02285-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The proposed difficulty scoring system (DSS) may aid in preoperative planning for laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (L-TME) for rectal cancer. METHODS Fifty-three patients [28 males; 59.0 (31.0-88.0) years of age] treated for rectal cancer at our institution from 2/2011-5/2018 were identified. "Difficult operation" (DO) was defined as the presence of ≥3 factors: operative time ≥320 min, estimated blood loss >250 ml, intraoperative complications, conversion to laparotomy, >2 stapler applications, incomplete TME quality, and/or subjective perceived difficulty. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model with backward elimination method were used to obtain a DSS which consists of two factors: sex (male = 1 and female = 0) and body mass index (BMI) (≥30 kg/m2 = 1, <30 kg/m2 = 0). RESULTS In univariate analysis, sex (p = 0.0217), BMI (p = 0.0026), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.0372), and magnetic resonance imaging transverse diameter (p = 0.0441) correlated to DO. Multivariate analysis revealed that sex and BMI were the most important risk factors for a DO [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.7761, 95% CI = (0.6443-0.9080)]. Male patients with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 were more likely to experience a DO (77.8%). The simplified DSS did not weaken the discriminating power compared to multivariate logistic regression model (AUC 0.7696 vs. 0.7761, p = 0.7387). L-TME with a DSS of 0, 1, and 2 had a DO rate of 10%, 33.3%, and 77.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A simplified DSS may be used preoperatively in preparation for L-TME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitri Krizzuk
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33331, USA
| | - Shlomo Yellinek
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33331, USA
| | - Albert Parlade
- Department of Imaging, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Hong Liang
- Department of Clinical Research, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Giovanna Dasilva
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33331, USA
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33331, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hong JSY, Brown KGM, Waller J, Young CJ, Solomon MJ. The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:991-1000. [PMID: 32623536 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02274-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The difficulty of performing total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer partly relies on the surgeon's subjective assessment of the individual patient's pelvic anatomy and tumour characteristics, which generally influences the choice of platform used (open, laparoscopic, robotic or trans-anal surgery). Recent studies have found associations between several anatomical pelvic measurements and surgical difficulty. The aim of this study was to systematically review existing data reporting the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based pelvic measurements to predict technical difficulty and outcomes of TME, and determine whether pelvimetry could optimise patient-specific selection of a particular surgical approach. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies reporting MRI-based pelvic measurements in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer, and the effect of these measurements on surgical difficulty. RESULTS Eleven studies reporting the association between MRI-pelvimetry measurements and rectal cancer surgical outcomes were included. Indicators for surgical difficulty used in the included studies were involved circumferential resection margin, longer operative time, incomplete TME, higher blood loss, anastomotic leak, conversion to open surgery and overall complications. Bony pelvic measurements which were associated with increased surgical difficulty in more than one study were a smaller interspinous distance, a smaller intertubercle distance, a smaller pelvic inlet and larger pubic tubercle height. Two studies identified larger mesorectal fat area as a predictor of surgical difficulty. CONCLUSIONS Bony pelvic measurements may predict surgical difficulty during TME, however, use of different indicators of difficulty limit comparison between studies. Early data suggest MRI soft tissue measurements may predict surgical difficulty and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S-Y Hong
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, Australia. .,Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, PO Box M40, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. .,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. .,Central Clinical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - K G M Brown
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, PO Box M40, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - J Waller
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - C J Young
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, PO Box M40, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - M J Solomon
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, PO Box M40, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Francis N, Penna M, Carter F, Mortensen NJ, Hompes R, Bandyopadhyay D, Black J, Campbell K, Chadwick M, Chase K, Chitsabesen P, Coleman M, Dalton S, Doeve J, Hendrickse C, Katory M, Knol J, Lee L, McArthur D, Miles T, Miskovic D, Ng P, Nicol D, Samad A, Talwar A, Kochupapy RT, Theobald I, Wegstapel H, West N, Wood S, Wynn G, Ziyaie D. Development and early outcomes of the national training initiative for transanal total mesorectal excision in the UK. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:756-767. [PMID: 32065425 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has attracted substantial interest amongst colorectal surgeons but its technical challenges may underlie the early reports of visceral injuries and oncological concerns. The aim of this study was to report on the feasibility, development and the outcome of the national pilot training initiative for TaTME-UK. METHODS TaTME-UK was successfully launched in September 2017 in partnership with the healthcare industry and endorsed by the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. This multi-modal training curriculum consisted of three phases: (i) set-up; (ii) selection of pilot sites; and (iii) formal proctorship programme. Bespoke Global Assessment Scoring (GAS) forms were designed and completed by both trainees and mentors. Data were collected on patient demographics, tumour characteristics and perioperative clinical and histological outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-four proctored cases were performed by 10 colorectal surgeons from five selected pilot sites. Median operative time was 331 ± 90 (195-610) min which was reduced to 283 ± 62 (195-340) min in the final case. Independent performance (GAS score of 5) was achieved for most operative steps by case 5. There was one conversion (4.2%), but no visceral injuries. Pathological data confirmed no bowel perforation and intact quality of the mesorectal TME specimens with clear distal margin in all cases and circumferential margins in 23/24 cases (96%). CONCLUSION This exploratory study demonstrates acceptable early outcomes in a small cohort suggesting that a competency-based multi-modal training programme for TaTME can be feasible and safe to implement at a national level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Francis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital Foundation Trust, Yeovil, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Faculty of Science, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - M Penna
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Churchill Hospital, University Hospitals of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - F Carter
- South West Surgical Training Network c.i.c., Yeovil, UK
| | - N J Mortensen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Churchill Hospital, University Hospitals of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - R Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Keller DS, Berho M, Perez RO, Wexner SD, Chand M. The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 17:414-429. [PMID: 32203400 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-020-0275-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Rectal cancer treatment has evolved during the past 40 years with the use of a standardized surgical technique for tumour resection: total mesorectal excision. A dramatic reduction in local recurrence rates and improved survival outcomes have been achieved as consequences of a better understanding of the surgical oncology of rectal cancer, and the advent of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments to compliment surgery have paved the way for a multidisciplinary approach to disease management. Further improvements in imaging techniques and the ability to identify prognostic factors such as tumour regression, extramural venous invasion and threatened margins have introduced the concept of decision-making based on preoperative staging information. Modern treatment strategies are underpinned by accurate high-resolution imaging guiding both neoadjuvant therapy and precision surgery, followed by meticulous pathological scrutiny identifying the important prognostic factors for adjuvant chemotherapy. Included in these strategies are organ-sparing approaches and watch-and-wait strategies in selected patients. These pathways rely on the close working of interlinked disciplines within a multidisciplinary team. Such multidisciplinary forums are becoming standard in the treatment of rectal cancer across the UK, Europe and, more recently, the USA. This Review examines the essential components of modern-day management of rectal cancer through a multidisciplinary team approach, providing information that is essential for any practising colorectal surgeon to guide the best patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah S Keller
- Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Centre, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mariana Berho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | | | - Steven D Wexner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Manish Chand
- Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS); University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Does anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection worsen long-term oncologic outcome? Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:1243-1253. [PMID: 32314189 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03577-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The influence of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival in patients with rectal cancer is debatable. The aim of this study was to evaluate relationships between anastomotic leakage and long-term survival. METHODS In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 395 consecutive stage I to III rectal cancer patients underwent anterior resection between 2007 and 2012. Five-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and 5-year local recurrence-free survival were compared between patients with leakage (Leakage (+)) and patients without leakage (Leakage (-)). RESULTS Of 395 patients, 50 (12.7%) had anastomotic leakage. Of these 50, 34 (68.0%) required urgent surgery and 16 (32.0%) could be managed by watchful waiting or with percutaneous drainage. The median follow-up period was 62.6 months. Five-year overall survival did not differ between the two groups (Leakage (+) 93.8% vs. Leakage (-) 89.0%, P = 0.121). Five-year disease-free survival also did not differ between the two groups (81.6% vs. 80.3%, P = 0.731), and neither did 5-year local recurrence-free survival (91.9% vs. 86.1%, P = 0.206). In a multivariable Cox regression model, BMI > 25, preoperative CA19-9 > 37, pathological T stage, pathological N stage, and circumferential resection margin (CRM) positive were independent predictors of disease-free survival. Moreover, pathological T stage, pathological N stage, and CRM positive were the only independent predictors of overall survival and local recurrence-free survival. Anastomotic leakage was not a risk factor for overall survival, disease-free survival, or local recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSION Anastomotic leakage is not associated with a significant decrease in long-term survival in rectal cancer patients.
Collapse
|
48
|
Pantalos G, Patsouras D, Spartalis E, Dimitroulis D, Tsourouflis G, Nikiteas N. Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. In Vivo 2020; 34:11-21. [PMID: 31882458 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy is being steadily adopted instead of two-dimensional (2D) for various procedures. Our aim was to compare the outcomes between 2D and 3D laparoscopic procedures for colorectal cancer in order to ascertain the safety, efficacy and potential advantages of 3D imaging systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic database search was conducted in March 2019. Comparative studies reporting clinical outcomes between patients undergoing elective colorectal procedures using either 2D or 3D laparoscopic equipment were eligible. RESULTS Six studies were selected, including 614 patients in total. Minor reduction in operative time, similar blood loss and increased number of harvested lymph nodes was noted for the 3D group. There was no difference for conversion to open surgery, time to flatus, postoperative hospital stay or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION 3D Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer may result in reduction of operative time and higher lymph node yields, leading to improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Pantalos
- Second Department of Pediatric Surgery, P. & A. Kyriakou Hospital, Athens, Greece .,Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.,Hellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Patsouras
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.,Hellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleftherios Spartalis
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.,Hellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Dimitroulis
- Hellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, Athens, Greece.,Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Gerasimos Tsourouflis
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.,Hellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, Athens, Greece.,Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Nikiteas
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.,Hellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (MIRS) Study Group, Athens, Greece.,Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Does Adjuvant Chemotherapy Improve Survival in T3N0 Rectal Cancer? An Evaluation of Use and Outcomes from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:1188-1191. [PMID: 32144549 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04541-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
50
|
Veerankutty FH, Nair N, Chacko S, Sreekumar VI, Varma D, Kurumboor P. Oncological adequacy of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection: An audit in Indian perspective. J Minim Access Surg 2020; 16:251-255. [PMID: 31793449 PMCID: PMC7440015 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_272_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer (LRR) has gained popularity because of better short-term outcomes and less post-operative morbidity. However, LRR is still not endorsed as a standard of care mainly due to concerns centred on oncological safety in comparison with open approach. Moreover, two recent randomised trials (Australian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum [ALaCaRT] and the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group [ACOSOG] Z6051) have failed to prove that LRR is non-inferior to open resection. Studies on oncological adequacy of LRR in the Indian population in terms of quality of mesorectal excision are scarce. In this article, we aim to audit the oncological adequacy of LRR in our centre and thereby critically analyse the reliability of extrapolation of results of ALaCaRT and ACOSOG trials to the Indian population. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the oncological adequacy of LRR in terms of completeness of total mesorectal excision (TME), distal and circumferential resection margin (CRM) status and nodal harvest in patients with rectal cancer who underwent LRR between January 2016 and June 2018 at our centre. Results: Of 157 patients included in this study, a complete TME was achieved in 148 (94.26%) patients and nearly complete in 7 (4.46%) patients. A safe CRM (≥1 mm) was obtained in 151 (96.18%) patients. Distal margin results were negative in 155 (98.73%) patients. Average nodal harvest was 19.86 ± 9.28. Overall surgical success, calculated as a composite measure of negative distal margin and negative CRM and complete TME was 95.54%. Conclusion: Good quality rectal cancer resection can be achieved by experienced laparoscopic surgeons without compromising oncological safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nandu Nair
- Department of GI and HPB Surgery, Aster Medcity, Cochin, Kerala, India
| | - Sidharth Chacko
- Department of GI and HPB Surgery, Aster Medcity, Cochin, Kerala, India
| | - Vipin I Sreekumar
- Department of GI and HPB Surgery, Aster Medcity, Cochin, Kerala, India
| | - Deepak Varma
- Department of GI and HPB Surgery, Aster Medcity, Cochin, Kerala, India
| | - Prakash Kurumboor
- Department of GI and HPB Surgery, Aster Medcity, Cochin, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|