Value of Routine Gastrografin Upper Gastrointestinal Study After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Evaluation of postoperative esophagram following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)

INTRODUCTION

The routine use of post-operative esophogram has come under evaluation for multiple upper GI surgeries such as with bariatric surgery and gastric resections. A major complication following Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is a leak from the myotomy site. A post-operative contrast esophogram is often utilized to evaluate the presence of a leak, however it is not a standardized care practice for all patients. Presently it is selectively performed depending on physician assessment intra-operatively. This project will evaluate the necessity of post-operative contrast esophogram following POEM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 277 patients diagnosed with achalasia who underwent POEM by two surgeons from 2011 to 2022. 173 patients met the inclusion criteria. A post-operative esophogram was used for the evaluation of a leak. Post-operative esophagram were selectively performed on day 1 following surgery using a water-soluble material. Data was evaluated using Stata.

RESULTS

There were 3 detected leaks in the group that underwent esophagrams compared to the non-esophagram group in the early post-operative period. The overall complication rate was 5.5% in the non-esophagram versus 7.9% in the esophagram group. Length of stay was 1.48 days in the non-UGI vs 1.76 days in the esophagram group. Readmission rate was 10.9% in non-esophagram versus 8.7% in esophagram group.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes in patients undergoing POEM who received post-operative esophagram verses patients who did not receive post-operative esophagram. The routine use of a contrast esophogram to detect a leak following POEM may not be justified. This study suggests that esophagrams should be performed depending on the clinical signs/symptoms post-operatively that would warrant imaging and intervention.

A Comprehensive Review of Endoscopic Management of Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery leaks result in significant morbidity and mortality. Experts report variable therapeutic approaches, without uniform guidelines or consensus.

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention, and treatment of gastric sleeve leaks, with a focus on endoscopic approaches. In addition, the efficacy and success rates of different treatment modalities are assessed.

DESIGN

A comprehensive review was conducted using a thorough literature search of 5 online electronic databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science) from the time of their inception through March 2020. Studies evaluating gastric sleeve leaks were included. MeSH terms related to "endoscopic," "leak," "sleeve," "gastrectomy," "anastomotic," and "bariatric" were applied to a highly sensitive search strategy. The main outcomes were epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Literature search yielded 2418 studies of which 438 were incorporated into the review. Shock and peritonitis necessitate early surgical intervention for leaks. Endoscopic therapies in acute and early leaks involve modalities with a focus on one of: (i) defect closure, (ii) wall diversion, or (iii) wall exclusion. Surgical revision is required if endoscopic therapies fail to control leaks after 6 months. Chronic leaks require one or more endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical approaches for fluid collection drainage to facilitate adequate healing. Success rates depend on provider and center expertise.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic management of leaks post sleeve gastrectomy is a minimally invasive and effective alternative to surgery. Their effect may vary based on clinical presentation, timing or leak morphology, and should be tailored to the appropriate endoscopic modality of treatment.