SQUIRE Reporting Guidelines for Quality Improvement Studies

A pilot project of a Post Discharge Care Team for firearm injury survivors decreases emergency department utilization, hospital readmission days, and cost

BACKGROUND

Persons of low socioeconomic status are overrepresented in the firearm injury patient population and may experience challenges in accessing complex outpatient health systems. Consequently, outpatient care for these patients is plagued by poor follow-up and increased emergency department (ED) utilization. We developed a Post Discharge Care Team (PDCT) consisting of a dedicated trauma nurse navigator and medical social worker to bridge the gap between hospital discharge and outpatient care to improve recovery.

METHODS

Adult firearm injury survivors admitted to the trauma service were randomized 1:1 to receive either PDCT services or standard of care (SOC) workflows. The PDCT nurse provided education and set expectations regarding injuries, wound care, and outpatient follow-up. The PDCT social worker performed a comprehensive assessment to identify concerns including housing and financial instability, food insecurity, or transportation issues. The primary outcome was ED utilization, with secondary outcomes including readmissions and overall health care costs compared between groups.

RESULTS

In the first 6 months of the study, a total of 44 patients were randomized to PDCT and 47 to SOC. There were 10 patients who visited the ED in the PDCT group compared with 16 in the SOC group ( p = 0.23) for a total of 14 and 23 ED visits, respectively. There were 14 patients in the PDCT and 11 patients in the SOC groups who were readmitted ( p = 0.31), but the PDCT group was readmitted for 27.9 fewer hospital days. After accounting for programmatic costs, the PDCT had a hospital savings of $34,542.71.

CONCLUSION

A collaborative, specialized PDCT for firearm injury survivors consisting of a dedicated trauma nurse navigator and medical social worker decreased outpatient ED utilization, readmission days, and was cost effective. Trauma centers with high volumes of penetrating trauma should consider a similar model to improve outpatient care for firearm injury survivors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Implementation of a quality improvement strategy to optimise the management of community acquired pneumonia in a rural health setting

PROBLEM

In Australia, inappropriate prescribing of antimicrobials is higher in rural and regional areas than in major city hospitals. Inappropriate prescribing is defined as the prescription of antimicrobial agents that do not adhere to guidelines in terms of type of antimicrobial chosen, dose and/or duration or are deemed unnecessary. A review of antimicrobial prescribing in a Queensland rural Hospital and Health Service (HHS) identified that respiratory infections were an area for potential improvement.

SETTING

The study was performed in a rural HHS in Queensland.

KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT

Appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing for baseline and post-implementation phases of the study was evaluated according to Therapeutic Guidelines: antibiotic recommendations for community acquired pneumonia (CAP).

STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE

Quality improvement strategy to implement a multifaceted package of interventions for CAP.

EFFECTS OF CHANGE

Post-implementation, overall appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing improved and there was a decrease in duration of antimicrobial therapy.

LESSONS LEARNT

A quality improvement strategy to implement a multifaceted package of interventions for CAP has shown to be acceptable and effective in improving the antimicrobial prescribing in a rural setting. Our findings highlight the importance of utilising a multifaceted package of interventions which can be tailored to the prescribers and the patients at hand. It is also valuable to engage with local clinicians to promote the optimal management of common infections in the rural setting.

Using volunteers to improve access to community rehabilitation in palliative care: the St Christopher's Living Well at Home Team

Background

UK hospices often provide outpatient rehabilitation services for people with advanced progressive illness. However, some people are unable to travel, leading to inequity in rehabilitation access.

Objectives

The Living Well at Home Team (LWAHT) at St Christopher's Hospice aimed to evaluate whether using volunteers to support rehabilitation in peoples' homes improved the reach of rehabilitation for people living in underserved localities and if it supported people to optimise their functional independence.

Methods

This service improvement project evaluated hospice rehabilitation uptake during the implementation of volunteer-supported community rehabilitation. Following assessment by an LWAHT therapist, eligible people were matched with a trained volunteer who supported four to eight rehabilitation sessions in the person's home. The evaluation assessed uptake of the rehabilitation sessions. Mobility, wellbeing, and goal attainment outcomes were assessed by the Life-Space Assessment (LSA), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), and Goal Attainment Scale (GAS), respectively.

Results

In the first year, 183 patients were referred to the LWAHT; 123 were assessed and 96 received rehabilitation including 56 who were matched with a volunteer. Following volunteer support, patients reported significant improvements in mobility [LSA median 20 (IQR, 3.5-27.8)], general health [GHQ -2 (-5.25 to 0)], and achievement of goals [GAS T-score +8 (0-18.4)].

Conclusions

It was feasible to support community rehabilitation using hospice volunteers for people with advanced progressive illness. The LWAHT service also increased the uptake of hospice centre-based rehabilitation. Further work should test efficacy and identify patients requiring additional professional input.

Key message

This is the first known study reporting on the use of trained rehabilitation volunteers to extend the reach of hospice rehabilitation services. People with limited access to the hospice, because of geographical location or personal circumstances, valued and benefited from tailored rehabilitation supported by the volunteers in their own homes.

Standardizing Child Passenger Safety Screening in the Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement Study

BACKGROUND

Motor vehicle collisions remain a leading cause of death and injury in children in the United States. Our Level I trauma center found that 53% of children ages 1-19 years are improperly restrained or unrestrained. Our center employs a Pediatric Injury Prevention Coalition with nationally certified child passenger safety technicians who are active in the community yet remain underutilized in the clinical setting.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the quality improvement project was to standardize child passenger safety screening in the emergency department to increase referrals to a Pediatric Injury Prevention Coalition.

METHODS

This quality improvement project utilized a pre-/postdesign of data collected before and after implementing the child passenger safety bundle. Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act model, organizational change processes were identified, and quality improvement interventions implemented from March to May 2022.

RESULTS

The total number of families referred was 199, representing 230 children, which was 3.8% of the eligible population. A significant relationship was found between child passenger safety screening and referral to the Pediatric Injury Prevention Coalition in 2019 and 2021, χ2 (1, n = 230) = 239.98, p < .001, and χ2 (1, n = 230) = 240.78, p < .001, respectively. Forty-one percent of the referred families established contact with the Pediatric Injury Prevention Coalition.

CONCLUSION

Standardizing child passenger safety screening in the emergency department increased referrals to a Pediatric Injury Prevention Coalition and resulted in improved child safety seat distribution and child passenger safety education.

Improving Perioperative Preparation for Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Distal Radius Fractures

We aimed to review common patient concerns after surgical repair of distal radius fracture (DRF) to identify potential interventions to improve the gap between expectation and education for DRF patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 100 consecutive patients who underwent surgical repair of DRF at a level I trauma center. Patient-initiated communication notes were reviewed with thematic analysis to identify the common reasons patients required additional information. We used the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool to score the available educational resources for DRF patients for the understandability and actionability of the educational materials provided to the patients.

Results

Of 165 patient communication episodes, 88.5% occurred postoperatively. The most common concerns were pain (30, 15.4%) and surgical site changes (24, 12.3%). Most communications (171, 83.4%) were resolved with patient education through instruction or reassurance. The reviewed materials did not address pain or surgical site changes. No reviewed materials provided actionable steps patients could take to facilitate recovery.

Conclusions

Pain management and normal wound healing were the most common surgical concerns of DRF patients. We identify opportunities to improve expectation-setting in online materials and during face-to-face education to create a more patient-centered perioperative experience.

The use of patient experience feedback in rehabilitation quality improvement and codesign activities: Scoping review of the literature

Objective

To characterize the literature, reported enablers, and gaps on the use of patient experience feedback for person-centered rehabilitation quality improvement and codesign activities.

Design

Scoping Review.

Data sources

Scientific databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Rehabdata, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest), website searches (e.g. Beryl Institute), snowballing, and key-informant recommendations.

Methods

Two independent reviewers performed title and abstract screenings and full-text reviews. Eligibility focused on English-language, peer-reviewed (all time) and gray literature (last five years) that used patient experience feedback in rehabilitation improvement activities. The aims, settings, methods, findings, implications, and reported limitations were extracted, followed by content analyses identifying reported enablers and gaps.

Results

Among the 901 unique references and 52 full texts reviewed, ten were included: four used patient experience surveys for improving patient experiences; six used codesign methodologies to engage patient feedback in service improvement activities. Implementation enablers included securing managerial support, having a structured methodology and facilitator, using efficient processes, engaging staff experiences, and using appreciative inquiry. Reported study gaps included limited follow-up, low sample sizes, analytical limitations, lack of reported limitations, or narrow range of perspectives (e.g. not from people with severe impairments).

Conclusion

Few examples of the use of patient experience feedback in quality improvement or codesign activities were found in the rehabilitation literature. Patient experience improvement activities relied exclusively on retrospective survey data, which were not combined with often more actionable forms (e.g. qualitative, real time) of patient experience feedback. Further research might consider design of activities that collect and use patient experience feedback for rehabilitation service improvements.

Impact of a same day admission project in reducing the preoperative bed occupancy demand in a pediatric inpatient hospital

Background

A same day admission approach was established for pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery owing to an increase in demand for bed availability and the need for medical, logistical, psychological, and fiscal improvements. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the same day admission approach for reducing demand for preoperative bed occupancy in pediatric inpatient units.

Method

Data on elective surgery patients considered for same day admission were prospectively collected in an Excel spreadsheet.

Results

Same day admission patients numbered 269 (25.87%; n = 1040), 461 (41.7%; n = 1104), 382 (38.67%; n = 998), and 560 (44.20%; n = 1267) in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. Over the 4-year period between 2018 and 2021, pediatric orthopedic surgeries accounted for the majority of same day admissions (29.72%; n = 497), followed by ear, nose, and throat (21.30%; n = 356), general (16.99%; n = 284), plastic (14.53%; n = 243); urology (9.87%; n = 165); optometry and ophthalmology (3.77%; n = 63); neuro (2.51%; n = 42), and dental (1.31%; n = 22) surgeries. The total number of days of saved preoperative beds over the 4-year period was 1672 days (an average of 418 hospital days per year).

Conclusions

This study showed that same day admission approach should be implemented in pediatrics institutions to reduce hospital bed demand. The implementation of this initiative is widely variable between specialties due to interlinked medical, operational, and logistical factors.

Level of Evidence

III.

•

Same day admission is a model to reduce the average length of hospital stay for surgical patients and to reduce costs.

•

The study is confirming the feasibility of applying the same day admissions' project in the pediatric population.

•

This study compares the applicability of the same day admission’s project across pediatrics’ surgical subspecialties.

•

This study proves the possibility of applying same day admission's project in the local region.

Implementation of a standardized voiding protocol after minimally invasive surgery: A quality improvement initiative

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of the implementation of a standardized voiding protocol in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy at a single cancer center in terms of the urinary tract infection (UTI) rate, time to first void, and overnight stays secondary to urinary retention.

METHODS

We enrolled 102 consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy at a single cancer center during a 12-month period. A pre-intervention cohort of 100 consecutive patients was identified for comparison. A multidisciplinary team developed and implemented a standardized voiding protocol using quality improvement methodology. We compared the demographics, time to first void, rate of urinary retention, and UTI rates between the pre- and post-intervention cohorts.

RESULTS

Our intervention led to a significant reduction in the time to first void (289 min vs. 566 min; P < 0.001), rate of urinary retention (2% vs. 10%; P = 0.015), and postoperative UTI (4% vs. 8%; P = 0.249). There was a similar rate of patients going home with a Foley catheter (9% vs. 11%; P = 0.850).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a standardized voiding protocol was associated with a reduction in rate of UTI, time to first void, and overnight stays secondary to urinary retention.

Totally Excited about Moving Mobility and Exercise (TEAM Me): A Successful Multidisciplinary Exercise Quality Improvement Initiative for Pediatric and Young Adult Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant Inpatients

Background: Pediatric, adolescent and young adult (PAYA) patients are less active than their healthy counterparts, particularly during inpatient stays. Methods: We conducted a quality improvement initiative to increase activity levels in patients admitted to our pediatric oncology and cellular therapy unit using a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model. An interdisciplinary team was assembled to develop an incentive-based inpatient exercise and activity program titled Totally Excited About Moving Mobility and Exercise (TEAM Me). As part of the program, patients were encouraged by their care team to remain active during their inpatient stay. As an additional incentive, patients earned stickers to display on TEAM Me door boards along with tickets that could be exchanged for prizes. Activity was assessed by documentation of physical therapy participation, tests of physical function, and surveys of staff perceptions of patient activity levels, motivations, and barriers. Results: Compared to baseline, patient refusals to participate in physical therapy decreased significantly (24% vs. 2%) (p < 0.02), and staff perceptions of patient motivation to stay active increased from 40% to 70% in the post implementation period. There were no changes in physical function tests. Conclusions: An incentive-based exercise program for young oncology inpatients greatly improved patient activity levels, participation in physical therapy and influenced professional caregivers’ beliefs.

Improving Vaccination for Young Children (IVY): A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

High childhood vaccination rates are critical for public health. We hypothesized that implementation of a vaccine education and quality improvement (QI) program, Improving Vaccinations for Young Children (IVY), would improve childhood vaccine rates.

METHODS

Eight pediatric practices (3 academic-based, 5 community-based) were randomized to implement IVY within a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (SWCRT) in middle Tennessee. Two educational modules on vaccines were developed using best practices in instructional design. Modules were provided electronically and were tailored to providers or office staff. Practices completed in-person QI coaching sessions and selected at least 2 vaccination-related QI changes. Data were collected monthly. The primary analysis examined intervention effect on the primary outcome of Combination 10 vaccination status for children who turned 2 in the previous month. Combination 10 status without influenza vaccine was a secondary outcome, and exploratory analyses assessed intervention effects after adjusting for time and practice type.

RESULTS

Data from 4041 patients (1788 control; 2253 intervention) were collected. The intervention effect was not significant on the primary outcome (OR = 1.01; 95% CI [0.76, 1.34]; P > .9), however there were positive intervention effects in secondary and exploratory models analyzing Combination10 rates without flu, including models adjusting for variation over time (0.20; 95% CI [0.04,0.35]; P = .01) and practice type (higher vaccination rate in academic practices, 0.23; 95% CI [0.03,0.42]; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination 10 rates were not significantly improved with IVY, yet evidence of beneficial effect on rates without flu vaccine was found. Future studies could evaluate effects over a longer time period and within a larger practice sample.