Association of Matrix Metalloproteinase 7 Expression With Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

The co-location of CD14+APOE+ cells and MMP7+ tumour cells contributed to worse immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer

Intra-tumour immune infiltration is a crucial determinant affecting immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its phenotype and related spatial structure have remained elusive. To overcome these restrictions, we undertook a comprehensive study comprising spatial transcriptomic (ST) data (28 712 spots from six samples). We identified two distinct intra-tumour infiltration patterns: immune exclusion (characterised by myeloid cells) and immune activation (characterised by plasma cells). The immune exclusion and immune activation signatures showed adverse and favourable roles in NSCLC patients' survival, respectively. Notably, CD14+APOE+ cells were recognised as the main cell type in immune exclusion samples, with increased epithelial‒mesenchymal transition and decreased immune activities. The co-location of CD14+APOE+ cells and MMP7+ tumour cells was observed in both ST and bulk transcriptomics data, validated by multiplex immunofluorescence performed on 20 NSCLC samples. The co-location area exhibited the upregulation of proliferation-related pathways and hypoxia activities. This co-localisation inhibited T-cell infiltration and the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures. Both CD14+APOE+ cells and MMP7+ tumour cells were associated with worse survival. In an immunotherapy cohort from the ORIENT-3 clinical trial, NSCLC patients who responded unfavourably exhibited higher infiltration of CD14+APOE+ cells and MMP7+ tumour cells. Within the co-location area, the MK, SEMA3 and Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) signalling pathway was most active in cell‒cell communication. This study identified immune exclusion and activation patterns in NSCLC and the co-location of CD14+APOE+ cells and MMP7+ tumour cells as contributors to immune resistance.

Gene expression profiling of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm

Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) are rare pancreatic malignant tumors, and comprehensive gene analyses are scarce. In this study, six NECs and six MiNENs were collected, immunohistochemistry for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, INSM1, Ki-67, and Rb was conducted, and KRAS mutational status was examined. Among these cases, comprehensive gene expression analysis of oncogene pathways using nCounter® were performed with six NECs and four MiNENs, and those data were compared with that of three pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs), with that of three normal pancreatic ducts, and with each other. By dividing NEC and MiNEN cases into KRAS-mutated group and KRAS-wild group, the difference of clinicopathological data and gene expression profiling data were examined between the two groups. Compared to the data of normal pancreatic epithelium, all 13 cancer-related pathways were upregulated in PDAC, MiNEN, and NEC group with more upregulation in this order. Compared to the data of PDAC, genes of DNA Damage repair pathway was most upregulated both in NECs and MiNENs. Regarding the difference between KRAS-mutated and KRAS-wild groups, several genes were differentially expressed between the two, where MMP7 was the upregulated gene with highest p-value and NKD1 was the downregulated gene with highest p-value in KRAS-mutated group. From the extent of upregulation of 13 pathways, MiNEN was considered more progressed stage than PDAC, and NEC was considered more progressed than MiNEN. From the comparison of KRAS-mutated and KRAS-wild NECs and MiNENs, several differentially expressed genes were identified in this study.

Combined utility of Ki-67 index and tumor grade to stratify patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent upfront surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic prediction of a new indicator, combined by tumor grade and Ki-67, in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from consecutive patients who underwent primary resection of pancreas from December 2012 to December 2017. Tumor grade and Ki-67 were reviewed from routine pathological reports. G-Ki67 was classified as three categories as I (G1/2 and Ki-67 < 40%), II (G1/2 and Ki-67 ≥ 40%), and III(G3/4 and all Ki-67).

RESULTS

Cox regression analyses revealed that tumor stage (II vs. I: hazard ratio (HR), 3.781; 95% confidence index (CI), 2.844-5.025; P < 0.001; III vs. I: HR, 7.476; 95% CI, 5.481-10.20; P < 0.001) and G-Ki67 (II vs. I: HR, 1.299; 95% CI, 1.038-1.624; P = 0.022; III vs. I: HR, 1.942; 95% CI, 1.477-2.554; P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors in the developing cohort. The result was rectified in the validation cohort. In subgroups analysis, G-Ki67 (II vs. I: HR, 1.866 ; 95% CI, 1.045-3.334; P = 0.035; III vs. I: HR, 2.333 ; 95% CI, 1.156-4.705; P = 0.018) also had a high differentiation for survival prediction.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that three-categories of G-Ki67 in resectable PDAC according to the routine pathological descriptions provided additional prognostic information complementary to the TNM staging system.

Survival benefit and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy following systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are increasingly receiving systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), particularly those with borderline resectable and locally advanced disease. However, the specific role of additional adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in these patients is unknown. The objective of this study is to further assess the clinical benefit and impact of systemic AC in patients with resected PDAC after NAC.

METHODS

Data on PDAC patients with or without AC following systemic NAC and surgical resection were retrospectively retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2006 and 2019. A matched cohort was created using propensity score matching (PSM), and baseline characteristics were balanced to reduce bias. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were calculated using matching cohorts.

RESULTS

The study enrolled a total of 1589 patients, with 623 (39.2%) in the AC group and 966 (51.8%) in the non-AC group [mean age, 64.0 (9.9) years; 766 (48.2%) were females and 823 (51.8%) were males]. All patients received NAC, and among the crude population, 582 (36.6%) received neoadjuvant radiotherapy, while 168 (10.6%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. Following the 1:1 PSM, 597 patients from each group were evaluated further. The AC and non-AC groups had significantly different median OS (30.0 vs. 25.0 months, P =0.002) and CSS (33.0 vs. 27.0 months, P =0.004). After multivariate Cox regression analysis, systemic AC was independently associated with improved survival ( P =0.003, HR=0.782; 95% CI, 0.667-0.917 for OS; P =0.004, HR=0.784; 95% CI, 0.663-0.926 for CSS), and age, tumor grade, and AJCC N staging were also independent predictors of survival. Only patients younger than 65 years old and those with a pathological N1 category showed a significant association between systemic AC and improved survival in the subgroup analysis adjusted for these covariates.

CONCLUSION

Systemic AC provides a significant survival benefit in patients with resected PDAC following NAC compared to non-AC patients. Our study discovered that younger patients, patients with aggressive tumors and potentially well response to NAC might benefit from AC to achieve prolonged survival after curative tumor resection.

Pancreatic Cancer-Secreted Proteins: Targeting Their Functions in Tumor Microenvironment

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a ravaging disease with a poor prognosis, requiring a more detailed understanding of its biology to foster the development of effective therapies. The unsatisfactory results of treatments targeting cell proliferation and its related mechanisms suggest a shift in focus towards the inflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we discuss the role of cancer-secreted proteins in the complex TME tumor-stroma crosstalk, shedding lights on druggable molecular targets for the development of innovative, safer and more efficient therapeutic strategies.

Focus on Therapeutic Options for Surgically Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Based on Novel Biomarkers

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains associated with a poor prognosis, even when diagnosed at an early stage. Consequently, it is imperative to carefully consider the available therapeutic options and tailor them based on clinically relevant biomarkers. In our comprehensive review, we specifically concentrated on the identification of novel predictive and prognostic markers that have the potential to be integrated into multiparametric scoring systems. These scoring systems aim to accurately predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in surgically resectable pancreatic cancer cases. By identifying robust predictive markers, we can enhance our ability to select patients who are most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, the identification of prognostic markers can provide valuable insights into the overall disease trajectory and inform treatment decisions. The development of multiparametric scoring systems that incorporate these markers holds great promise for optimizing the selection of patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, leading to improved outcomes in resectable pancreatic neoplasia. Continued research efforts are needed to validate and refine these markers and scoring systems, ultimately advancing the field of personalized medicine in pancreatic adenocarcinoma management.

Survival outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical resection versus upfront surgery for stage I-III pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy remains controversial in treating resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. This study aims to assess the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on survival in patients with PDAC according to their clinical stage.

METHODS

Patients with resected clinical Stage I-III PDAC from 2010 to 2019 were identified in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. A propensity score matching method was utilized within each stage to reduce potential selection bias between patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and patients who underwent upfront surgery. An overall survival (OS) analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 13 674 patients were included in the study. The majority of the patients ( N =10 715, 78.4%) underwent upfront surgery. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery had significantly longer OS than those with upfront surgery. Subgroup analysis revealed that the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group's OS is comparable to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In clinical Stage IA PDAC, there was no difference in survival between the neoadjuvant treatment and upfront surgery groups before or after matching. In stage IB-III patients, neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery improved OS before and after matching compared to upfront surgery. The results revealed the same OS benefits using the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery could improve OS over upfront surgery in Stage IB-III PDAC but did not provide a significant survival advantage in Stage IA PDAC.

Targeted therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Mechanisms and clinical study

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy with a high rate of recurrence and a dismal 5-year survival rate. Contributing to the poor prognosis of PDAC is the lack of early detection, a complex network of signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms, a dense and desmoplastic stroma, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. A recent shift toward a neoadjuvant approach to treating PDAC has been sparked by the numerous benefits neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has to offer compared with upfront surgery. However, certain aspects of NAT against PDAC, including the optimal regimen, the use of radiotherapy, and the selection of patients that would benefit from NAT, have yet to be fully elucidated. This review describes the major signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms involved in PDAC initiation and progression in addition to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of PDAC. We then review current guidelines, ongoing research, and future research directions on the use of NAT based on randomized clinical trials and other studies. Finally, the current use of and research regarding targeted therapy for PDAC are examined. This review bridges the molecular understanding of PDAC with its clinical significance, development of novel therapies, and shifting directions in treatment paradigm.

Cancer-cell-derived sialylated IgG as a novel biomarker for predicting poor pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy and prognosis in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly applied in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, accurate prediction of therapeutic response to NAT remains a pressing clinical challenge. Cancer-cell-derived sialylated immunoglobulin G (SIA-IgG) was previously identified as a prognostic biomarker in PDAC. This study aims to explore whether SIA-IgG expression in treatment-naïve fine needle aspirate (FNA) biopsy specimens could predict the pathological response (PR) to NAT for PDAC.

METHODS

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided FNA biopsy specimens prior to NAT were prospectively obtained from 72 patients with PDAC at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. SIA-IgG expression of PDAC specimens was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Associations between SIA-IgG expression and PR, as well as patient prognosis, were analyzed. A second cohort enrolling surgically resected primary tumor specimens from 79 patients with PDAC was used to validate the prognostic value of SIA-IgG expression.

RESULTS

SIA-IgG was expressed in 58.3% of treatment-naïve FNA biopsies. Positive SIA-IgG expression at diagnosis was associated with unfavorable PR and can serve as an independent predictor of PR. The sensitivity and specificity of SIA-IgG expression in FNA specimens in predicting an unfavorable PR were 63.9% and 80.6%, respectively. Both positive SIA-IgG expression in treatment-naïve FNA specimens and high SIA-IgG expression in surgically resected primary tumor specimens were significantly associated with shorter survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of SIA-IgG on FNA specimens prior to NAT may help predict PR for PDAC. Additionally, SIA-IgG expression in treatment-naïve FNA specimens and surgically resected primary tumor specimens were predictive of the prognosis for PDAC.