Early Outcomes of Subtotal vs Total Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis

Resection of the remnant gallbladder after subtotal cholecystectomy: An institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is an acceptable method of preventing bile duct injuries in "difficult" gallbladders. However, it is associated with postoperative bile leaks and retained gallstones that may necessitate resection of the gallbladder remnant. This study evaluates the outcomes of patients who underwent completion cholecystectomy for ongoing symptoms or complication after subtotal cholecystectomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of adults who underwent laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy after previous subtotal cholecystectomy at a single institution from 2009 to 2023. Indications for reoperation were collected and intraoperative findings, operative outcomes, and rates of postoperative morbidity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Over 14 years, 46 patients underwent completion cholecystectomy, with 40 (80%) in the last 5 years. Remnant cholecystitis was the most common reason for reoperation in 37 patients (80.4%). Choledocholithiasis was seen in 4 cases (8.7%). Bile leak, gallstone pancreatitis, and abdominal abscess were observed in 8 (17.4%), 4 (8.7%), and 5 (10.8%) patients, respectively. Four patients (8.7%) had intestinal fistulas intraoperatively. Laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy was attempted in all, with 2 (4.4%) converted to open laparotomy. The median operative time was 111 minutes (interquartile range, 83-140 minutes), and the median hospital stay was 1 day (interquartile range, 0-2 days). Minor complications occurred in 5 patients (10.9%), which were managed conservatively. Four patients had major complications requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous intervention. There were no bile duct injuries or reoperations, and 44 (95.6%) patients had complete symptom resolution at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy is feasible and safe but technically challenging. With the increased use of subtotal cholecystectomy, patients presenting with persistent postoperative pain require timely work-up and management of their symptoms.

Gallbladder and biliary pathology: lessons learned from multidisciplinary conference

The radiologic diagnosis of biliary disease can be challenging due to atypical or delayed presentation, rare or less common entities, and imaging overlap of benign and malignant processes. Establishing a specific diagnosis, when possible, is important to avoid progression of infections to sepsis and multiorgan failure, and for appropriate staging and management in cases of malignancy. Gallstones are the most common biliary disease, and along with stone-related complications, including cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis, constitute the majority of acute biliary pathology. Late and atypical manifestations of acute cholecystitis demonstrate imaging overlap with primary gallbladder cholangiocarcinoma, especially with cases of exuberant inflammatory reaction such as xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. Additional challenging scenarios related to gallbladder disease, that may be benign or malignant, include adjacent fistulas and lymphadenopathy. Dropped gallstones, especially in atypical locations, may be misdiagnosed as neoplastic. Recurrent cholecystitis after cholecystectomy, whether related to subtotal cholecystectomy or to stumpitis, is another entity that can be confusing to the radiologist with a documented history of cholecystectomy. Inflammatory and autoimmune conditions, such as pseudotumors and IgG4 disease, are a less common but not infrequent cause of diagnostic dilemma. Furthermore, biliary strictures and hepatobiliary cystic lesions can be benign or malignant and could constitute a diagnostic and management challenge. The goal of this manuscript is to present the lessons learned from multidisciplinary conferences on the above entities and suggest tips and pearls to maximize the value of radiologists' contribution to patient management.

Management of the Difficult Gallbladder

Cholecystectomies are very common in general surgery practice. A small percentage of these will present with factors that pose operative difficulty. The surgeon should have a high index of suspicion based on preoperative factors of patients that may present an operative challenge and have necessary equipment available and the surgical skill to provide the best surgical outcome for the patient if a total cholecystectomy is unable to be performed.

Bail Out Procedures in Acute Cholecystitis: Risk Factors and Optimal Approach

BACKGROUND

For difficult cholecystectomies, bail out procedures (BOP) are performed to mitigate risk of patient harm.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to identify risk factors for BOP for acute cholecystitis and to compare outcomes by type of BOP performed. Methods: Patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent cholecystectomy were included (2020-2022). Demographics, clinical data, and outcomes were collected. Primary outcome was <30-day complication rate. Groups were defined by surgery performed: BOP vs Laparoscopic Complete Cholecystectomy (LCC). BOPs were defined as any deviation from laparoscopic complete cholecystectomy. Univariate analyses compared outcomes between groups. Multivariable analysis identified independent factors associated with BOP. Subgroup analysis compared outcomes of laparoscopic BOP vs open BOP.

RESULTS

Of 728 patients, 659 (91%) underwent LCC and 69 (9%) underwent BOP: 34 (49%) laparoscopic BOP and 35 (51%) open BOP. Independent predictors of BOP included admission total bilirubin >0.2 mg/dL (OR 5.80, P = .017), >7 days of symptoms at time of cholecystectomy (OR 1.96, P = .019), and arrival heart rate >100 bpm (OR 1.82, P = .032). On subgroup analysis, laparoscopic vs open BOP demonstrated no difference in operative time (P = .536) and overall (P = .733) or gallbladder-related complications (P = .364), including bile leaks (P = .090). Laparoscopic BOP was associated with shorter postoperative lengths of stay (P = .005).

CONCLUSION

The risk factors for BOP identified in this study may help inform patient consent and operative planning. Laparoscopic BOP incurred equivalent complications to open BOP but with shorter hospital stays, challenging conventional dogma that conversion to open is the optimal approach for complicated acute cholecystitis.

Bailout for the Difficult Gallbladder: Subtotal vs. Open Cholecystectomy-A Retrospective Tertiary Care Center Experience

Background and Objectives: A difficult gallbladder anatomy augments the risk of bile duct injuries (BDIs) and other complications during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study compares the outcomes of a laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSTC) and open total cholecystectomy (OTC) for difficult cholecystectomies. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis of gallbladder procedures (LSTC or OTC) from 2016 to 2023 examined patient demographics, surgical details, and postoperative results. The primary outcome was the incidence of a BDI. Secondary outcomes included operative duration, blood loss, and postoperative complications. Results: Seventy-one patients were included in the study. Of them, 59.2% (n = 42) underwent an LSTC and 44.6% (n = 29) underwent an OTC. The LSTC cohort was more likely to have a day-surgery case with a same-day discharge (33.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.009), less blood loss (71.4 ± 82.26 vs. 184.8 ± 234.86, p = 0.009), and a shorter operative duration (187.86 ± 68.74 vs. 258.62 ± 134.52 min, p = 0.008). Furthermore, BDI was significantly lower in the LSTC group (2.4% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.045). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups concerning intraoperative drain placement, peri-cholecystic fluid collection, bile leak, and other complications (p > 0.05). Conclusions: LSTC is a safe and effective alternative to OTC for challenging gallbladder cases. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods as well as different study designs are warranted.

Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conversion to open as a bailout procedure: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate morbidity and mortality in patients taken to conversion to open procedure (CO) and subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) as bailout procedures when performing difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHOD

This observational cohort study retrospectively analyzed patients taken to SLC or CO as bailout surgery during difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 2014 and 2022. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for morbimortality.

RESULTS

A total of 675 patients were included. Of the 675 patients (mean [SD] age 63.85 ± 16.00 years; 390 [57.7%] male) included in the analysis, 452 (67%) underwent CO and 223 (33%) underwent SLC. Overall, neither procedure had an increased risk of major complications (89 [19.69%] vs 35 [15.69%] P.207). However, CO had an increased risk of bile duct injury (18 [3.98] vs 1 [0.44] P.009), bleeding (mean [SD] 165.43 ± 368.57 vs 43.25 ± 123.42 P < .001), intestinal injury (20 [4.42%] vs 0 [0.00] P.001), and wound infection (18 [3.98%] vs 2 [0.89%] P.026), while SLC had a higher risk of bile leak (15 [3.31] vs 16 [7.17] P.024). On the multivariable analysis, Charlson comorbidity index (odds ratio [OR], 1.20; CI95%, 1.01-1.42), use of anticoagulant agents (OR, 2.56; CI95%, 1.21-5.44), classification of severity of cholecystitis grade III (OR, 2.96; CI95%, 1.48-5.94), and emergency admission (OR, 6.07; CI95%, 1.33-27.74) were associated with presenting major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

SLC was less associated with complications; however, there is scant evidence on its long-term outcomes. Further research is needed on SLC to establish if it is the safest in the long-term as a bailout procedure.

ROBOtic Care Outcomes Project for acute gallbladder pathology

BACKGROUND

Robotic cholecystectomy is being increasingly used for patients with acute gallbladder disease who present to the emergency department, but clinical evidence is limited. We aimed to compare the outcomes of emergent laparoscopic and robotic cholecystectomies in a large real-world database.

METHODS

Patients who received emergent laparoscopic or robotic cholecystectomies from 2020 to 2022 were identified from the Intuitive Custom Hospital Analytics database, based on deidentified extraction of electronic health record data from US hospitals. Conversion to open or subtotal cholecystectomy and complications were defined using ICD10 and/or CPT codes. Multivariate logistic regression with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to compare clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic approach after balancing covariates. Cost analysis was performed with activity-based costing and adjustment for inflation.

RESULTS

Of 26,786 laparoscopic and 3,151 robotic emergent cholecystectomy patients being included, 64% were female, 60% were ≥45 years, and 24% were obese. Approximately 5.5% patients presented with pancreatitis, and 4% each presenting with sepsis and biliary obstruction. After IPTW, distributions of all baseline covariates were balanced. Robotic cholecystectomy decreased odds of conversion to open (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.93; p = 0.035), but increased odds of subtotal cholecystectomy (odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.60; p = 0.037). Surgical site infection, readmission, length of stay, hospital acquired conditions, bile duct injury or leak, and hospital mortality were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in hospital cost.

CONCLUSION

Robotic cholecystectomy has reduced odds of conversion to open and comparable complications, but increased odds of subtotal cholecystectomy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder diseases. Further work is required to assess the long-term implications of these differences.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Subtotal vs total cholecystectomy for difficult gallbladders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

With severely inflamed gallbladders, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be difficult and may require procedures like subtotal cholecystectomy (SC). Few studies exist comparing SC and total cholecystectomy (TC) in the setting of severe biliary inflammation. This meta-analysis aims to compare SC and TC for difficult gallbladders.

METHODS

Medline-OVID, Embase-OVID, and Cinahl were searched including only studies comparing SC to TC for difficult gallbladders. Primary outcome was CBD injury. Secondary outcomes included bile leak, duodenal injury, retained stone, bleeding, intraabdominal collection, wound infection, reoperation, and mortality.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included. Compared to TC, SC significantly lowered the risk for CBD injury (0 ​% vs. 1.6 ​%, RR 0.30, 95%CI 0.10-0.87) but increased risk of bile leaks (RR 3.5, 95%CI 1.79-6.84), postoperative ERCP (RR 2.86, 95%CI 1.53-5.35), intraabdominal collections (RR 2.55, 95%CI 1.32-4.93), and reoperation (RR 2.92, 95%CI 1.14-7.47).

CONCLUSION

SC is a reasonable alternative to difficult gallbladders that may decrease the risk of CBD injuries. Knowing both approaches is crucial to manage the difficult gallbladder while minimizing harm. Further studies are needed to understand the value of SC for difficult cholecystectomy.

Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Subtotal and Total Cholecystectomy for Complicated Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare clinical outcomes in patients with complicated acute cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic total vs subtotal cholecystectomy.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and queried PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases from inception to May 2023. The primary outcome was complication rates including common bile duct injury, wound infection, reoperation, bile leak, retained stones, and subhepatic collection, whereas secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies with 135,233 cases were included for meta-analysis. Patients who underwent laparoscopic total cholecystectomy had a significantly lower risk of postoperative bile leaks (RR: .15; 95% CI: .03, .80) and subhepatic fluid collection (RR: 0.19; 95% CI: .06, .63) and were 2.94 times less likely to die compared to those who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy (RR .34; 95% CI: .15, .77). Patients who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy had significantly longer hospital length of stay (mean difference 1.0 days; 95% CI: .5 days, 1.4 days).

CONCLUSIONS

In adult patients presenting with complicated cholecystitis, management with laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy presents a unique complication profile with increased risk of postoperative bile leak and subhepatic fluid collection, in-hospital mortality, and longer hospital length-of-stay when used as an alternative approach to laparoscopic total cholecystectomy. Further research into the most appropriate clinical scenarios and patient populations for the use of the subtotal cholecystectomy approach may prove useful in improving its associated outcomes.

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes, Costs, and Readmission Between Total and Subtotal Cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

An increasing body of literature supports subtotal cholecystectomy (STC) in the management of patients with difficult gallbladder anatomy; however, large-scale studies examining outcomes of total cholecystectomy and STC are lacking.

METHODS

All adults undergoing total cholecystectomy or STC were tabulated from the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Entropy balancing was performed to adjust for patient differences based on extent of resection. Subsequent multivariable regression models were used to assess the association of STC with major adverse events, postoperative length of stay (pLOS), hospitalization costs, and 30-day non-elective readmission rates.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 854 357 patients, 7089 (.8%) underwent STC. Compared to total, STC patients were significantly older, less commonly female, and had a higher Elixhauser Index (all P < .001). Both cohorts had similar rates of postoperative ERCP (1.7% vs 1.5%, P = .33); however, the STC cohort had significantly higher utilization of subsequent drainage procedures (1.8% vs .5%, P < .001). After entropy balancing and multivariable risk-adjustment, STC was not associated with greater odds of MAE (AOR 1.11, 95% CI .99-1.23, P = .06). Notably, relative to total, STC was associated with longer pLOS (β .14, 95% CI .11-.17, P < .001) and greater hospitalization costs (β + $1,900, 95% CI 1300-2,500, P < .001). However, the extent of resection was not associated with the likelihood of 30-day non-elective readmission (AOR 1.01, 95% CI .91-1.13, P = .86).

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that STC is a viable, yet resource intensive, option in the management of complex cholecystitis.

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis following the Tokyo Guidelines 2018: a prospective single-center study of 201 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) poses multiple challenges. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) eliminated the time limit (< 72 h) and expanded the surgical indication to severe AC. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ELC for AC following the TG18 in a single high-volume center.

METHODS

From 2019 to 2021, we managed all AC patients with a TG18 flowchart and prospectively enrolled those who underwent ELC within 7 days of symptom onset. The primary outcome was overall morbidity, with a comparison between mild (Grade I) and moderate/severe (Grade II/III) AC.

RESULTS

During the study period, 201 patients underwent ELC was for Grade I (56.2%), II (40.3%), and III (3.5%) ACs. Mean age was 69 ± 15.2 years and time to surgery from symptom onset was 0 (12.9%), 1-3 (66.7%), and 4-7 days (20.4%). Mean operative time and blood loss were 118.9 ± 42.7 min and 57.8 ± 99.4 mL, respectively. The critical view of safety (CVS) was achieved in 76.1% of patients, and bailout procedures were performed in 21.4%. There were no open conversions or bile duct injuries. Major morbidities (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ IIIa) were observed in 5.5% of cases and mortality in 0.5%. Comparing Grades II/III to Grade I, operative time was longer (112.3 vs. 127.3 min, p = 0.014), blood loss was higher (40.3 vs. 80.1 mL, p = 0.005), the CVS rate was lower (83.2 vs. 67.0%, p = 0.012), and the major morbidity rate was higher (1.8 vs. 10.2%, p = 0.012). In the subgroup analysis of Grade II/III, there were no significant differences in major morbidities (p = 0.288) between the two groups (0-3 vs. 4-7 days).

CONCLUSION

ELC for AC following TG18 is feasible with low morbidity rates. However, ELC for Grade II/III ACs remains challenging, and surgeons must carefully assess intraoperative difficulties and surgical risks before proceeding.

Review of the Literature on Partial Resections of the Gallbladder, 1898-2022: The Outline of the Conception of Subtotal Cholecystectomy and a Suggestion to Use the Terms 'Subtotal Open-Tract Cholecystectomy' and 'Subtotal Closed-Tract Cholecystectomy'

Current descriptions of the history of subtotal cholecystectomy require more details and accuracy. This study presented a narrative review of the articles on partial resections of the gallbladder published between 1898 and 2022. The Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles items guided the style and content of this paper. The systematic literature search yielded 165 publications. Of them, 27 were published between 1898 and 1984. The evolution of the partial resections of the gallbladder began in the last decade of the 19th century when Kehr and Mayo performed them. The technique of partial resection of the gallbladder leaving the hepatic wall in situ was well known in the 3rd and 4th decades of the 20th century. In 1931, Estes emphasised the term 'partial cholecystectomy'. In 1947, Morse and Barb introduced the term 'subtotal cholecystectomy'. Madding and Farrow popularised it in 1955-1959. Bornman and Terblanche revitalised it in 1985. This term became dominant in 2014. From a subtotal cholecystectomy technical execution perspective, it is either a single-stage (when it includes only the resectional component) or two-stage (when it also entails closure of the remnant of the gallbladder or cystic duct) operation. Recent papers on classifications of partial resections of the gallbladder indicate the extent of gallbladder resection. Subtotal cholecystectomy is an umbrella term for incomplete cholecystectomies. 'Subtotal open-tract cholecystectomy' and 'subtotal closed-tract cholecystectomy' are terms that characterise the type of completion of subtotal cholecystectomy.