Quantitative Tension on the Abdominal Wall in Posterior Components Separation With Transversus Abdominis Release

Abdominal Wall Tension and Early Outcomes after Posterior Component Separation with Transversus Abdominis Release: Does a "Tension-Free" Closure Really Matter?

BACKGROUND

Ventral hernias result in fibrosis of the lateral abdominal wall muscles, increasing tension on fascial closure. Little is known about the effect of abdominal wall tension on outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction. We aimed to identify an association between abdominal wall tension and early postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent posterior component separation (PCS) with transversus abdominis release (TAR).

STUDY DESIGN

Using a proprietary, sterilizable tensiometer, the tension needed to bring the anterior fascial elements to the midline of the abdominal wall during PCS with TAR was recorded. Tensiometer measurements, in pounds (lb), were calibrated by accounting for the acceleration of Earth's gravity. Baseline fascial tension, change in fascial tension, and fascial tension at closure were evaluated with respect to 30-day outcomes, including wound morbidity, hospital readmission, reoperation, ileus, bleeding, and pulmonary complications.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients underwent bilateral abdominal wall tensiometry, for a total of 200 measurements (left and right side for each patient). Mean baseline anterior fascial tension was 6.78 lb (SD 4.55) on each side. At abdominal closure, the mean anterior fascial tension was 3.12 (SD 3.21) lb on each side. Baseline fascial tension and fascial tension after PCS with TAR at abdominal closure were not associated with surgical site infection, surgical site occurrence, readmission, ileus, and bleeding requiring transfusion. The event rates for all other complications were too infrequent for statistical analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline and residual fascial tension of the anterior abdominal wall do not correlate with early postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing PCS with TAR. Further work is needed to determine if abdominal wall tension in this context is associated with long-term outcomes, such as hernia recurrence.

STAPLED FASCIAL CLOSURE VS. CONTINUOUS HAND-SEWN SUTURE: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE ABDOMINAL WALL ON PORCINE MODEL AND HUMAN CADAVER

BACKGROUND

One of the primary complications associated with large incisions in abdominal surgery is the increased risk of fascial closure rupture and incisional hernia development. The choice of the fascial closure method and closing with minimal tension and trauma is crucial for optimal results, emphasizing the importance of uniform pressure along the suture line to withstand intra-abdominal pressure.

AIMS

To evaluate the resistance to pressure and tension of stapled and sutured hand-sewn fascial closure in the abdominal wall.

METHODS

Nine abdominal wall flaps from human cadavers and 12 pigs were used for the experimentation. An abdominal defect was induced after the resection of the abdominal wall and the creation of a flap in the cadaveric model and after performing a midline incision in the porcine models. The models were randomized into three groups. Group 1 was treated with a one-layer hand-sewn small bite suture, Group 2 was treated with a two-layer hand-sewn small bite suture, and Group 3 was treated with a two-layer stapled closure. Tension measurements were assessed in cadaveric models, and intra-abdominal pressure was measured in porcine models.

RESULTS

In the human cadaveric model, the median threshold for fascial rupture was 300N (300-350) in Group 1, 400N (350-500) in Group 2, and 350N (300-380) in Group 3. Statistical comparisons revealed non-significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 (p=0.072, p>0.05), Group 1 and Group 3 (p=0.346, p>0.05), and Group 2 and Group 3 (p=0.184, p>0.05). For porcine subjects, Group 1 showed a median pressure of 80 mmHg (85-105), Group 2 had a median of 92.5 mmHg (65-95), and Group 3 had a median of 102.5 mmHg (80-135). Statistical comparisons indicated non-significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 (p=0.243, p>0.05), Group 1 and Group 3 (p=0.468, p>0.05), and Group 2 and Group 3 (p=0.083, p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Stapled and conventional suturing resist similar pressure and tension thresholds.