Ring chromosome 8 syndrome: further characterization

First case of two supernumerary markers derived from chromosome 5 and chromosome 8

Background

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) are additional centric chromosome fragments too small to be identified by banding cytogenetics alone. A sSMC can originate from any chromosome and it is estimated that 70% of sSMC are de novo, while 30% are inherited. Cases of sSMC derived from chromosome 5 (sSMC5) are rare, accounting for1.4% of all reported sSMC cases. In these patients, the most common reported features are macrocephaly, dysmorphic facial features, heart defects, growth retardation, hypotonia, and intellectual disability. Also sSMC derived from chromosome 8 are very rare and the phenotype of patients with sSMC8 is very variable. Common clinical features of the patients include developmental delay, mental retardation, intellectual disability, hypotonia, hypospadias, attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD), skeletal anomalies, dysmorphic facial features, and renal dysplasia. To the best of our knowledge, in literature there are no cases with coexistence of sSMC5 and sSMC8, so we reviewed the literature to compare cases with SMC5 and those with SMC8 separately. This study is aimed to highlight the unique findings of a patient with the coexistence of sSMC5 and sSMC8.

Case presentation

We describe a female patient with two supernumerary markers derived from chromosome 5 (SMC5) and chromosome 8 (SMC8). The patient was born prematurely at 30 weeks with respiratory distress and bronchodysplasia. On physical examination she presented dysmorphic features, respiratory issues, congenital heart defect, developmental delay, and intellectual disability. The G-banded chromosome analysis on cultured lymphocytes revealed in all the analyzed cells a female karyotype with the presence of two supernumerary chromosomal markers and the array-CGH highlighted the region and the size of these two duplications. We also used the fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis (FISH) using painting of chromosomes 5 and 8 to confirm the origin of the two sSMC. So, the karyotype of the patient was: 48, XX, +mar1, +mar2.

Conclusions

This is the first case with two markers: one from chromosome 5 and one from chromosome 8. Based on the data reported, we can affirm that the phenotype of our patient is probably caused mainly by the presence of the sSMC.

Fetal genital anomalies: an aid to diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience with the prenatal diagnosis of fetal genital anomalies and suggest a protocol for management.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all the cases with fetal genital anomalies or phenotype and genotype discrepancy identified by prenatal ultrasound.

RESULTS

Twenty cases with abnormal fetal genitalia and four with a phenotype and genotype discrepancy were diagnosed prenatally. Genital anomalies were rarely found in isolation, most were found in combination with renal or multiple structural anomalies. The etiology of abnormal genitalia was broad and included metabolic, chromosomal and genetic syndromes.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal detection of genital anomalies should stimulate a detailed ultrasound examination and determination of genotypic sex. Measurement of 17-OHP and Delta(4)-androstenedione or metabolites of the cholesterol pathway in the amniotic fluid and/or maternal urine may be helpful in making a definitive diagnosis. Identification of genital anomalies in fetuses with renal or multiple abnormalities can aid prenatal diagnosis, thereby facilitating accurate counseling of parents who are then in a better position to make informed choices.

Mosaic ring 20 with no detectable deletion by FISH analysis: Characteristic seizure disorder and literature review

Ring chromosome 20 is a rare chromosome disorder characterized by a typical seizure phenotype consisting of complex partial seizures, frequent progression to generalized tonic or tonic-clonic seizures, and nocturnal frontal lobe seizures with frequent episodes of non-convulsive status epilepticus. Development may be normal or mildly delayed, followed by cognitive and behavioral decline after seizure onset. Here, we describe a patient with a typical severe seizure phenotype and a mosaic ring chromosome 20 without loss of p or q subtelomere regions or telomeric sequences. The ring had a longer telomere length than either of the telomere ends of its homologous chromosome 20 by quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, suggesting that it might be derived from telomere-telomere fusion. The phenotypic comparison of this patient and other chromosome 20 cases that had terminal deletions of 20qter (n = 1) and 20pter (n = 7), shows that the epilepsy phenotype and electroencephalographic abnormalities are characteristic in patients with ring chromosome 20. Several hypotheses have been proposed to address the elusive mechanisms underlying the seizure disorder in ring chromosome 20. These possibilities include haploinsufficiency of two epilepsy genes CHRNA4 and KCNQ2 located at 20qter, silencing of these genes by a telomere position effect, or microdeletions or rearrangements of genetic material during the ring formation.

Characterization of six marker chromosomes by comparative genomic hybridization

We applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in six patients with de novo prenatal or postnatal extra marker chromosomes (MC). In four cases, MCs were mosaic and in one of them, the MC was detected in less than 50% of the cells. In three cases, CGH identified the origin of the extra MCs. In the other three, two prenatal cases and one child with an abnormal phenotype, CGH showed normal profiles. Among these cases, a normal profile and entirely C-band positive was identified suggesting that MC did not contain euchromatin. Genetic imbalances detected by CGH were as follow: a gain of 8p10-p12 in a boy with facial dysmorphism, hyperactivity and speech delay, a gain of 8q10-q12 in a healthy man with a history of spontaneous abortions, and a gain of 15q11-q13 in a girl with speech delay, and motor skill and object manipulation difficulties. Clinical data of these patients were compared with those reported in the literature. We conclude that CGH is a very useful and powerful tool for characterizing prenatal or postnatal MCs, even when the mosaicism is present and the MCs are present in less than 50% of the cells.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of two small chromosome 8 derived supernumerary mosaic markers

Two small supernumerary mosaic marker chromosomes (SMC) were identified by conventional cytogenetics, one prenatally, the other postnatally. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques, including 24-color FISH, were applied to identify both SMCs and better characterize their constitution. Patient 1: a 29 year-old man, whose wife had a spontaneous abortion, was found to have a small ring of the pericentromeric region of chromosome 8 (47,XY,+r(8)(p11q11)/46,XY). Patient 2: a 37 year-old woman had amniocentesis. The fetus was found to have a SMC; its presence was confirmed postnatally. Several FISH techniques (24-color, whole chromosome paints, centromeres, telomeres, band 8p22) led to the identification of a small analphoid marker. The marker was an inversion-duplication for part of the short arm of chromosome 8 (47,XY,+inv dup (8)(p23pter)/46,XY). The 24-color FISH allowed us to conclude that both markers originated exclusively from chromosome 8. However, the structure and content of the markers were elucidated using other molecular cytogenetic techniques, showing their complementarity.

Supernumerary ring chromosome 8: Clinical and molecular cytogenetic characterization in a case report

We report on a 3-year-old male with developmental delay, autistic behavior, and minor abnormalities consistent with trisomy 8 syndrome whose cytogenetic analysis revealed mosaicism for a supernumerary ring chromosome (SRC). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies, using centromeric and yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) probes, were performed to characterize further the supernumerary chromosome. The ring origin has been detected from the short arm of chromosome 8, resulting in r(8)(p10p23.1). Moreover, uniparental disomy (UPD) using microsatellite analysis was excluded. To our knowledge a total of 25 cases, confirmed by FISH, have been reported with either supernumerary marker or ring chromosome 8. We present a detailed clinical and molecular cytogenetic characterization of this additional case in order to better define the genotype-phenotype correlation.

Ring chromosome 12 with variable phenotypic features: clinical report and review of the literature

A ring chromosome 12 (p13; q24.33) was observed in all cells analyzed from peripheral blood lymphocytes of a 15-year-old female referred for academic difficulties and growth delay. In addition to clinical manifestations generally observed with ring chromosome 12 such as growth retardation, mental deficiency, microcephaly, the patient had bilateral pseudocamptodactyly of little fingers, mild hirsutism, exaggerated lumbar lordosis, and ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD). The clinical features of reported cases are analyzed. The only consistent features were growth retardation and mental deficiency. Breakpoint in all the cases has been at the telomeric region with minimal deletion of chromosomal material. An account of complex changes at mitosis and meiosis in ring chromosome has been given. Examination of 200 metaphases demonstrated 2% cell line was showing 45,XX, -12. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level was normal ruling out overlapping monosomy 12 syndrome.

Muellerian aplasia associated with ring chromosome 8p12q12 mosaicism

We report on a woman with Muellerian aplasia, renal and skeletal anomalies, and minor dysmorphic signs. Conventional cytogenetic analysis revealed mosaicism for a small supernumerary, undefinable ring chromosome. Chromosome microdissection and reverse painting demonstrated that this marker contained pericentric material from chromosome 8 (8p12q12). Thus, we identified a Muellerian aplasia phenotype with partial trisomy 8 mosaicism.