Boriskin YS, Fuller K, Powles RL, Vipond IB, Rice PS, Booth JC, Caul EO, Butcher PD. Early detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in bone marrow transplant patients by reverse transcription-PCR for CMV spliced late gene UL21.5: a two site evaluation.
J Clin Virol 2002;
24:13-23. [PMID:
11744424 DOI:
10.1016/s1386-6532(01)00209-8]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients at risk of developing cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonitis are identified routinely by the early detection of virus in blood. For early diagnosis of CMV infection, the RNA-based approach demonstrates advantages when compared with the current CMV antigen and DNA detection methods.
OBJECTIVES
We have evaluated our previously developed reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to a spliced late CMV gene (SLG; J. Virol. Methods 56 (1996), 139) to monitor CMV infection in BMT patients at two clinical sites. The diagnostic value of the SLG RT-PCR was compared with the routine CMV antigen and DNA detection methods.
STUDY DESIGN
Weekly blood samples from BMT patients were tested for CMV during the first 3 months post-transplant. The qualitative SLG RT-PCR, semiquantitative DNA PCR, and viral antigen tests were compared. The RNA and DNA PCR results were analysed in terms of their temporal relationship and consistency of CMV detection and compared with CMV infection diagnosed by viral antigen tests.
RESULTS
Of the 101 BMT recipients studied, 25 developed CMV antigenemia and/or DNAemia resulting in symptomatic infection in two patients. All CMV PCR-positive patients were either CMV seropositive pretransplant or received marrow from seropositive donor. The highest incidence of CMV infection was seen in seropositive recipients (R+) irrespective of the donor's status. Detection of CMV infection by SLG RNA preceded CMV DNA detection by 0-2 weeks (median 1 week) and CMV antigen detection by 0-8 weeks (median 3 weeks). Once detected, the SLG RNA remained consistently positive before antiviral treatment was commenced. Both the SLG RNA and CMV DNA detection methods had the same clinical sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 100, 94, 80 and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The RT-PCR for SLG RNA proved to be the earliest indicator of CMV infection in BMT patients demonstrating a sustained pattern of CMV detection during the 3 months post-transplant period. Although very similar in its diagnostic performance to CMV DNA PCR the SLG RNA RT-PCR does not require quantitation and provides an efficient and ongoing indication of active CMV infection.
Collapse