Thoracic complications in patients undergoing intraperitoneal heated chemotherapy with mitomycin following cytoreductive surgery

Postoperative Respiratory Failure Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy is Associated with Volume of Intraoperative Crystalloid Administration and Worse Survival

BACKGROUND

Postoperative respiratory failure (PRF) is associated with increased morbidity after surgery. This retrospective study explores preoperative and perioperative risk factors associated with PRF in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) and the resultant impact on survival.

METHODS

We identified all patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC at our institution between 2007 and 2017. PRF was defined as mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h after surgery or reintubation not related to an additional procedure within the first 30 days postoperatively. The relationship between clinicopathologic variables and PRF was examined using Kaplan-Meier log-rank survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression models with 90-day, 1-year and 5-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Overall, 314 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC, of whom 24 patients (7.6%) developed PRF. On univariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was the only preoperative risk factor associated with PRF (p = 0.049). Of the intraoperative risk factors, diaphragmatic resection (p = 0.008), Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) > 20 (p < 0.001), and volume of intraoperative crystalloid (p < 0.001) were all associated with PRF. On multivariable Cox regression, only intraoperative crystalloid was significantly associated with PRF (p < 0.001), with a volume above 5.3 L (area under the curve [AUC] 0.77) having a high predictive accuracy for PRF. Five-year OS was significantly decreased in patients with PRF (30.2% vs. 52.6%, hazard ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.5-4.4; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Liberal intraoperative crystalloid volume resuscitation is a potential independent, modifiable intraoperative risk factor for PRF following CRS/HIPEC that may contribute to decreased long-term OS.

HIPEC in Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Origin: A Systematic Review of Regimens and Techniques

(1) Background: Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Complete cytoreductive surgery including gastrectomy and complete removal of all peritoneal lesions followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) achieves promising results. There exists an immersive variety of approaches for HIPEC that makes it difficult to weigh different results obtained in the literature. In order to enable standardization and development of HIPEC, we here present a systematic review of different drug regimens and technical approaches. (2) Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched on 26 May 2021 using the mesh terms “intraperitoneal chemotherapy AND gastric cancer”. Under consideration of systematic review guidelines, articles reporting on HIPEC in combination with CRS were selected. Data on duration, drugs, dosage, and other application parameters as well as morbidity and long term survival data were extracted for subsequent statistical analysis, tabulation, and descriptive synthesis. We assessed the risk of bias due to inhomogeneity of the patient cohort and incompleteness of report of HIPEC parameters. (3) Results: Out of 1421 screened publications, 42 publications presenting data from 1325 patients met the criteria. Most of the publications were single institutional retrospective cohort studies. The most common HIPEC regimen is performed after gastrointestinal anastomosis and consists of 50–200 mg/m² cisplatinum and 30–40 mg/m² mytomycin C at 42–43 °C for 60–90 min in a closed abdomen HIPEC system with three tubes. Almost every study reported incompletely on HIPEC parameters. Lower rates of anastomotic leakage were reported in studies that performed HIPEC after gastrointestinal anastomosis. Studies that performed open HIPEC and integrated a two-drug regimen indicated better overall survival rates. (4) Discussion: This is an exhaustive overview of the use of drug regimens and techniques for HIPEC after CRS for gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis. Other indications and application modes of intraperitoneal chemotherapy such as prophylactic or palliative HIPEC apart from CRS were not addressed. (5) Conclusion: Complete report of HIPEC parameters should be included in every publication. A consensus for dose expression either per BSA or as flat dose is desirable for comparison of the drug regimens. Despite numerous variations, we identified the most common regimens and techniques and their advantages and disadvantages according to the data in the literature. More phase I/II studies are needed to identify the best approach for HIPEC. (6) Other: This review was not supported by third parties.

Peritoneal Cancers and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an aggressive, potentially curative approach used to treat locoregional disease associated with primary and secondary malignancies of the peritoneum. It involves resection of all macroscopic disease larger than 2.5 mm, followed by instillation of hyperthermic chemotherapy directly into the peritoneum for higher drug exposure to microscopic disease. In select patients with primary peritoneal mesothelioma, pseudomyxoma peritonei, colorectal adenocarcinoma, appendiceal adenocarcinoma, or ovarian cancer, with no extra-abdominal metastasis and limited involvement of the peritoneum, the procedure can be performed to increase overall survival.

Epidural analgesia? A prospective analysis of perioperative coagulation in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is beneficial in peritoneal carcinomatosis. Epidurals provide excellent pain relief for laparotomies. Coagulopathy (platelet count <100 × 10⁹/L, INR>1.5 or PTT >45) occurs with CRS and HIPEC, increasing risk for bleeding complications with epidurals. This prospective study characterizes clot kinetics with thromboelastography (TEG) to determine suitability for epidural analgesia.

METHODS

After Research Ethics approval, thirty consented patients had blood collected. Primary data collected included TEG and conventional coagulation measures (platelets, PTT and INR). Secondary data collected included demographics, disease, surgical, intraoperative factors and complications from epidural placement.

RESULTS

Of 30 patients analyzed, two had incomplete data. Four developed abnormal coagulation between the second and fifth post-operative day. For all patients, TEG values remained normal. Postoperative INR was elevated until day 3 (all INR < 1.5). 17 patients received epidural analgesia, 3 demonstrated abnormal conventional coagulopathic criteria despite normal TEG.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study CRS and HIPEC do not contribute to the conventional definition of clinical coagulopathy. Clot kinetics indicate that epidural catheters may be recommended for post-operative analgesia.

Intensive care unit admission after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Is it necessary?

Introduction. Cytoreductive surgery (CS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a new approach for peritoneal carcinomatosis. However, high rates of complications are associated with CS and HIPEC due to treatment complexity; that is why some patients need stabilization and surveillance for complications in the intensive care unit. Objective. This study analyzed that ICU stay is necessary after HIPEC. Methods. 39 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis were treated according to strict selection criteria with CS and HIPEC, with closed technique, and the chemotherapy administered were cisplatin 25 mg/m(2)/L and mitomycin C 3.3 mg/m(2)/L for 90-minutes at 40.5°C. Results. 26 (67%) of the 39 patients were transferred to the ICU. Major postoperative complications were seen in 14/26 patients (53%). The mean time on surgical procedures was 7.06 hours (range 5-9 hours). The mean blood loss was 939 ml (range 100-3700 ml). The mean time stay in the ICU was 2.7 days. Conclusion. CS with HIPEC for the treatment of PC results in low mortality and high morbidity. Therefore, ICU stay directly following HIPEC should not be standardized, but should preferably be based on the extent or resections performed and individual patient characteristics and risk factors. Late complications were comparable to those reported after large abdominal surgery without HIPEC.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a Patient with Peritoneal Mesothelioma and HIV Infection

Background

High rates of septic complications have been associated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, which has been suggested as the treatment of choice for isolated peritoneal malignancies. Patients infected by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are still considered at a high operative risk.

Method

A 58-year-old man with HIV infection and diffuse peritoneal mesothelioma underwent optimal cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Results

The patient experienced a complete clinical response to therapy with no adverse effect on disease course or markers for HIV (CD4 count, beta2-microglobulin, neopterin, p24 antigen, and viral load).

Conclusion

This report suggests that this innovative approach can be successfully performed also in this clinical setting. In selected patients who respond to all criteria, surgery is possible and is a safe and effective therapeutic option.

Early and long-term postoperative management following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Peritoneal surface malignancies have been traditionally regarded as end-stage conditions amenable to merely palliative options. The combination of aggressive cytoreductive surgery (CRS), involving peritonectomy procedures and multivisceral resections, with intra-operative hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and/or early postoperative intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) to treat the microscopic residual tumor is a new concept. In recent years, promising results have been reported for peritoneal mesothelioma and carcinomatosis of gastrointestinal and gynaecologic origin treated by this combined protocol. However, CRS with HIPEC and/or EPIC is a complex procedure associated with high rates of potentially life-threatening complications. Furthermore, disease progression following comprehensive treatment is not uncommon and represents a relevant cause of treatment failure. The present paper reviews the available information on early postoperative management and long-term follow-up in patients treated with CRS and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The peculiar clinical and biological alterations that can be expected during an uncomplicated postoperative course, as compared to standard digestive surgery, are discussed. Early recognition and appropriate management of the most common adverse events are addressed, in order to minimize the impact of treatment-related morbidity on survival and quality of life results. Since re-operative surgery with additional HIPEC, has proven to be useful in selected patients with recurrent disease, long-term surveillance aiming at early detection of postoperative disease progression has become a relevant issue. Current results on follow-up investigations are presented.

Postoperative Infections in Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Intraoperative Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a common evolution of many abdominal and pelvic malignancies. Over the last decade novel therapeutic approaches have emerged combining cytoreductive surgery with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Aim of our study was to assess frequency, sites, and organisms of postoperative infections in this surgery and to evaluate associated risk factors and clinical outcome.

METHODS

Retrospective study of postoperative infection in 30 patients undergoing combined cytoreductive surgery and hypertermic intraoperative chemotherapy in an oncologic surgery in Rome, between June 2001 and December 2004.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine postoperative infections were recorded in 11 patients (36.7%; 2.6 infections per patient), including 13 surgical site infections, 8 clinical sepsis, 6 bloodstream infections, and 2 pneumonias. At multivariate analysis, total peritonectomy was found as independent variable associated to postoperative infection. Mortality rates were 36.4% and 5% among patients with and without postoperative infections, respectively (P = 0.04). Four of the 5 patients with invasive candidosis died.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritonectomy procedures have an high risk of postoperative infections, prolonged hospital stay, and high morbidity and mortality. The increasing role of this surgery for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis should strengthen the need for a careful evaluation of possible risk factors for postoperative infections, including the role of colonizing organisms.

Cytoreductive surgery and intraoperative intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin

The median survival in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal adenocarcinoma is,with conventional approaches, only about six months. Combined treatment consisting of maxi-mum cytoreductive surgery plus intraoperative intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy has been shown, albeit in small non-comparative series, to increase disease-free survival and overall survival, compared with previous series. Further, a randomized trial has demonstrated better results (a median survival of 22.4 months) with cytoreduction plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy compared with conventional chemotherapy. Technical considerations, infrastructure requirements and possible complications imply specialized centres and staff. Surgery consists of peritonectomy of affected areas and fulguration of all macroscopic lesions. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy must reach all parts of the peritoneal cavity and the temperature of the hyperthermic procedure must be maintained between 42-44 degrees C. Three prognostic factors associated with this procedure are: pathologic tumour grade, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, and cytoreductive surgery grade.

Cytoreductive surgery followed by intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion: analysis of morbidity and mortality in 209 peritoneal surface malignancies treated with closed abdomen technique

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this prospective Phase II study was to analyze morbidity and mortality of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies.

METHODS

A total of 205 patients (50 with peritoneal mesothelioma, 49 with pseudomyxoma peritonei, 41 with ovarian cancer, 32 with abdominal sarcomatosis, 13 with colon cancer, 12 with gastric cancer, and 8 with carcinomatosis from other origins) underwent 209 consecutive procedures. Four patients underwent the intervention twice because of disease relapse. There were 70 men and 135 women. Mean age was 52 years (range, 22-76 yrs). CRS was performed by using peritonectomy procedures. IPHP through the closed abdomen technique was conducted with a preheated (42.5 degrees C) perfusate containing cisplatin + mitomycin C or cisplatin + doxorubicin.

RESULTS

Major morbidity rate was 12%. The most significant complications were 23 anastomotic leaks or bowel perforations, 4 abdominal bleeds, and 4 sepses. Operative mortality rate was 0.9%. On logistic regression model multivariate analysis, extent of cytoreduction (odds ratio [OR], 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-6.40) and dose of cisplatin for IPHP > or = 240 mg (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.24-7.90) were independent risk factors for major morbidity. Ten patients presented with Grade 3 to 4 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS + IPHP presented acceptable morbidity, toxicity, and mortality rates, all of which support prospective Phase III clinical trials.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Aggressive therapeutic regimens have been advocated for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. It is essential to understand the clinical and histological features that govern the natural history of this condition if the efficacies of novel therapeutic approaches are to be assessed adequately.

METHODS

A database of 3019 colorectal cancers was used to identify patients with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis, patients who developed metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis, and those without carcinomatosis. Clinical, histological and survival data for the groups were collated and subjected to statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Some 349 patients (13 per cent) with peritoneal carcinomatosis were identified; 214 had synchronous disease and 135 had metachronous carcinomatosis. Some 125 patients (58 per cent) in the synchronous group were free of systemic metastases; 80 of these patients had localized disease. Liver metastases, tumour (T) stage, nodal stage, and venous and perineural invasion were independent predictors of metachronous carcinomatosis. The median survival of patients with synchronous disease was 7 months; survival was adversely affected by the extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis and the T stage of the primary cancer.

CONCLUSION

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a common mode of disease progression in patients with colorectal cancer. For the majority of patients the prognosis is poor, but a small number with localized disease may be suitable for further aggressive therapy.

Malignant mesothelioma: options for management

In the past, there has been a tendency to think of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma as one disease in therapeutic terms, regardless of histological type and tumor stage. This does not happen with other tumors, yet it is equally illogical and inappropriate in mesothelioma. As with other tumors, early diagnosis-while the disease is still in stage I, or even at an in situ stage-must be the goal so that therapy can be maximized, particularly if immunotherapy or gene therapy is to be used. Patients with pure epithelial mesothelioma have a better prognosis and respond better to trimodality therapy. Stage I patients who meet fitness criteria should be offered the option of radical surgery in combination with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Further research is required to determine the optimum neoadjuvant and adjuvant modalities, particularly the timing of individual drugs, use of hyperthermia, and route of administration. The place of immunotherapy and gene therapy as adjunctive treatments also remains to be defined. For example, it may be possible to reduce tumor bulk and perhaps downstage the disease with immunotherapy before radical surgery, if treatment is started early enough. Gene therapy may have a role either preoperatively or in destroying the microscopic disease that remains after radical surgery. These and other combinations of treatment need to be tested in well-designed clinical trials, probably on a multicenter basis (to enroll a sufficient number of patients). Finding the means to improve treatment for sarcomatous and mixed histology mesothelioma remains a challenge. At present, radical surgery does not seem worthwhile for these patients when combined with currently employed chemotherapy and radiotherapy; however, chemotherapy combinations used for treating other sarcomas need to be evaluated as adjunctive therapy before radical surgery is abandoned altogether as a mode of treatment. A collaborative approach involving thoracic surgeons, basic scientists and oncologists, and physicians with experience in treating mesothelioma is essential. Despite its increasing frequency, mesothelioma is still a relatively rare tumor, so treatment should be concentrated in relatively few supraregional centers to maximize expertise and allow innovative treatment combinations to be implemented with the greatest chance of success. Evaluation of new therapeutic approaches will be achieved more rapidly if these supraregional centers collaborate in multicenter trials. The nihilistic approach of simply waiting until the mesothelioma epidemic eventually begins to decline spontaneously in 20 or 30 years is untenable in view of the hundreds of thousands of deaths that will result if no effective treatment is found.

Prospective Trial for the Treatment of Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and often rapidly fatal disease with median survival of 5 to 12 months for untreated cases and 16 months reported after multimodality treatment. We report a prospective clinical treatment study using cytoreductive surgery combined with intraoperative intraperitoneal heated chemotherapy (IPHC) perfusion using mitomycin C for MPM. Twelve patients (11 male with a mean age 51 years) were treated. Seven patients presented with bulky disease and seven with ascites. All underwent exploratory laparotomy with histologically confirmed diagnosis of MPM. Surgical debulking as feasible was performed. Complete gross tumor removal was possible in only one patient. Cytoreduction was followed by a 2-hour closed low-volume IPHC using mitomycin C. One patient died 50 days postoperatively from complications relating to small bowel perforation. Hematologic toxicity of the procedure was minimal. Ascites was controlled in all patients and permanently in 86 per cent of patients presenting with ascites. To date median survival is 34.2 months with median follow-up of 45.2 months. One patient was re-explored for ventral hernia 2 years post-IPHC, had negative peritoneal biopsies, and remains disease-free at 5 years. Given the dismal prognosis associated with MPM the results of treatment with cytoreductive surgery combined with IPHC perfusion are encouraging. The rarity of MPM makes appropriately powered prospective randomized trials unlikely. Therefore, we now offer this approach off protocol; however, further study of this combined modality therapy is warranted.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma remains a difficult tumor to treat, much less cure. Currently, the best chance for long-term survival lies with early diagnosis and aggressive surgical extirpation, but given the typically long delay between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis, this is only possible with a high index of suspicion and an aggressive diagnosis workup. Early referral to a tertiary center experienced in the treatment of MPM may be important for several reasons: (1) decreased risk of tumor spread along multiple thoracenesis/biopsy tracts, (2) the availability of specialized pathologic assays for definitive diagnosis, (3) the availability of critical staging modalities (aggressive mediastinoscopy +/- thoracoscopy, MRI scans performed according to specific mesothelioma protocols, and perhaps PET scans), (4) surgical experience with pleurectomy/decortication and/or extrapleural pneumonectomy, that may decrease morbidity and mortality, and (5) the availability of novel adjuvant protocols. Single-modality therapy is unlikely to result in long-term survival. Aggressive surgery is required for optimal debulking, and extrapleural pneumonectomy may offer better local control compared with pleurectomy/ecortication. Delivery of optimal radiation schedules, which may involve large fractions as well as large total doses, is limited by the presence of nearby dose-limiting structures. Current chemotherapy is severely lacking in producing objective responses and improved survival although gemcitabine and IL-2 may be active agents to be combined with radiation and/or other agents. Hyperthermia, photodynamic therapy, intracavitary therapy, and gene therapy are all relatively new techniques under active investigation that should be supported by enrollment in on-going protocols. Predictably, many of these techniques provide greater benefit when used in the setting of adjuvant protocols or minimal residual disease, emphasizing the importance of multimodality therapy.

Extensive cytoreductive surgery followed by intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with mitomycin-C in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin

Peritoneal seeding from colorectal cancer has a very poor prognosis and is relatively resistant to systemic chemotherapy. We performed a phase I/II trial to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of extensive cytoreductive surgery in combination with intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in these patients. 29 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin without evidence of distant metastases underwent cytoreductive surgery and intra-operative HIPEC with mitomycin-C (MMC), followed by systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin. Surgical complications occurred in 11 patients (38%). One patient died directly related to the treatment, resulting in a mortality rate of 3%. MMC toxicity existed mainly of leucocytopenia (in 15 patients; 52%). After a median follow-up of 38 months (range 26-52 months) we found a 2- and 3-year survival rate (Kaplan-Meier) of 45 and 23%, respectively. Extensive cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is feasible in patients with peritoneal seeding of colorectal cancer. First results suggest that a higher median survival could be achieved compared with conventional palliative surgery and systemic chemotherapy, therefore a randomised phase III study is now being conducted.

Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome Occurring in Two Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery plus Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Case Reports and a Review of the Literature

Cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy with mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil may be considered as an accepted treatment for appendiceal malignancy with mucinous peritoneal carcinomatosis or for pseudomyxoma peritonei. This aggressive approach has been successfully utilized in approximately 500 patients with an acceptable mortality (1.5%) and morbidity (27%). Although pulmonary complications are frequently recorded, life-endangering acute respiratory failure in the absence of pulmonary infection or an obvious source of systemic sepsis has not been previously described. An extensive clinical review of two patients who had a clinical course compatible with acute respiratory distress syndrome without obvious cause except for the cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy itself was undertaken. These two patients developed gradually increasing respiratory distress in the postoperative period. No bacterial or fungal infections of lungs or intra-abdominal sites or sepsis were discovered. These two patients were unusual in that they had extensive cytoreduction, maximal heat with the mitomycin C chemotherapy, and perfusion of both the abdominal cavity and the right pleural space. Reoperation in both patients failed to show a septic source within the abdomen for progressive adult respiratory distress syndrome. We conclude that aggressive cytoreductive surgery plus perioperative intraperitoneal and intrapleural chemotherapy was associated with life-endangering respiratory failure in two patients. No other cause for this condition was evident from an exhaustive review of the clinical course of these two patients. It is possible that this aggressive approach to appendix malignancy with carcinomatosis is sufficiently traumatic to be considered a cause of adult respiratory distress syndrome.

Cytoreductive Surgery with Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy for Disseminated Peritoneal Cancer of Gastrointestinal Origin

No standard effective treatment exists for peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastrointestinal origin. The pharmacokinetic advantage of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and the synergy of heat and certain anticancer agents have prompted researchers to investigate intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy in treating disseminated peritoneal cancers. We have conducted a large Phase II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of aggressive cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC) in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastrointestinal origin. Patients with disseminated peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastrointestinal origin with or without malignant ascites were eligible. After aggressive surgical debulking, patients were administered a 2-hour heated (40.5° C) intraperitoneal perfusion with mitomycin C. The major response variable monitored was overall survival. Patients were assessed for toxicity after IPHC administration using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Eighty-four patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastrointestinal origin were evaluated for survival and toxicity (colon, n = 38; appendix, n = 22; stomach, n = 19; other gastrointestinal, n = 5). Thirty-nine (46%) patients had malignant ascites at the time of therapy. The operative mortality (30-day) was 6 per cent. Hematologic toxicity was the most common toxicity but was of mild to moderate severity (7 and 4% of patients had grade 3/4 white blood cell or platelet toxicity, respectively). The overall median survival was 14.3 months. The median survival of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of appendiceal, colorectal, and gastric origins were 31.1+, 14.6, and 10.1 months, respectively. Significant differences in median survival were seen in patients without and with malignant ascites (27.7 vs 7.6 months; P = 0.0004) and R0/R1 (complete gross tumor resection) versus R2 (gross residual tumor) surgical resection status (28.5+ vs 10.8 months, P = 0.0002). These data suggest that aggressive cytoreductive surgery with IPHC using mitomycin C is safe and effective in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastrointestinal origin. Additional studies and broader applications of this treatment are encouraged.