Role of salvage chemotherapy with topotecan and cisplatin in patients with paclitaxel- and platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer: a phase II pilot study

Efficacy of cisplatin combined with topotecan in patients with advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer as second- or higher-line palliative chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer treated with cisplatin combined with topotecan as second- or higher-line palliative chemotherapy.We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer, who were treated with cisplatin (50 mg/m on day 1) and topotecan (0.75 mg/m on days 1-3). Treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed, and laboratory data were reviewed to evaluate toxicities.Thirty one patients were treated with cisplatin and topotecan. The objective response rate (ORR) was 22.6%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 61.3%. The median PFS was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-5.2 months) and the median OS was 44.5 months (95% CI, 35.5-53.5 months). The ORR (33.3% vs. 0%; P = .012) was significantly better in the platinum-sensitive group compared to the platinum-resistant group. The median PFS was significantly longer in the platinum-sensitive group compared to the platinum-resistant group (7.7 vs 2.5 months; P < .001), and the median OS was also significantly longer in the platinum-sensitive group (46.6 vs 19.3 months; P < .001). Almost all of the patients reported some degree of hematological toxicity. A high rate of grade 3-4 neutropenia (87.1%) was observed. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (41.9%) and febrile neutropenia (19.4%) were also seen.The results showed that cisplatin combined with topotecan, as second- or higher-line palliative chemotherapy for patients with advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer, might be effective, especially in the platinum-sensitive group. However, attention should be paid to the high hematological toxicity associated with this drug combination.

Comparison of the efficacy between topotecan- and belotecan-, a new camptothecin analog, based chemotherapies for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a single institutional experience

AIM

To compare the efficacy and toxicity between topotecan- and belotecan-based chemotherapies in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

The clinical data of 80 patients treated with topotecan- (n = 45) or belotecan- (n = 35) based chemotherapy as at least a second-line chemotherapy were reviewed retrospectively between July 2001 and December 2007. Response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) and serum CA-125 levels. Hematological toxicity was examined according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 2.0. Time to progressive disease (TTPD), chemotherapy-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) according to the 2 chemotherapies were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Overall response rate (ORR) was 24.4% in patients treated with topotecan-based chemotherapy, while it was 45.7% in those treated with belotecan-based chemotherapy (P = 0.046). Moreover, ORR was higher in platinum-sensitive patients treated with belotecan-based chemotherapy (58.8%) than those treated with topotecan-based chemotherapy (22.2%) (P = 0.041) although it was not significantly different in platinum-resistant patients (P = 0.471). Grade 3 or 4 anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia developed in 14.8% vs 3.6%, 43.1% vs 55.6%, and 20.0% vs 12.8% of cycles in topotecan- and belotecan-based chemotherapies, respectively (P < 0.05). There were no significant difference in survival between the 2 chemotherapies.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, belotecan-based chemotherapy seemed to be efficient with acceptable toxicity, compared to topotecan-based chemotherapy in recurrent EOC. However, randomized controlled trials are required for the comparison of the efficacy and toxicity between topotecan- and belotecan-based chemotherapies in recurrent EOC.

Phase I/IIa study of combination chemotherapy with CKD-602 and cisplatin in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and therapeutic efficacy of a newly developed CKD-602 topoisomerase I inhibitor and cisplatin in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. CKD-602 (0.30 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) on day 5) were administered to patients every 3 weeks with dose adjustment of CKD-602 by 0.05 mg/m(2) daily until the MTD was reached. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade >or= 3 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia for more than 4 days or accompanied by fever >or= 38.5 degrees C, infection, hemorrhage, or transfusion; grade >or= 3 nonhematological toxicity except for alopecia, nausea, and vomiting. We enrolled 26 patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who had measurable disease (MD) estimated by computed tomography scan (n= 12) and nonmeasurable disease (NMD) evaluated by serum CA-125 levels (n= 14). All patients received 188 cycles of CKD-602 and cisplatin with a median number of six cycles per patient (range, 2 to 12). MTD of CKD-602 was 0.30 mg/m(2) daily. The overall response rate was 69.2% (18/26) with 58.3% (7/12) and 78.6% (11/14) in MD and NMD, respectively. Among the responsive patients, 14 were platinum sensitive (14/18, 77.7%) and four were platinum resistant (4/8, 50.0%). The most common toxicity was grade >or= 3 neutropenia developing in 17 patients (65.4%) and 72 cycles (38.3%). Grade 3 nausea and anorexia were the most common gastrointestinal toxicities, developing in 15 cycles (8.0%) of four patients (15.4%) and 10 cycles (5.3%) of five patients (19.3%), respectively. The median disease-free interval was 6 months (range 0-26 months). CKD-602 at a concentration of 0.3 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days and cisplatin at 60 mg/m(2) on day 5 every 3 weeks showed high efficacy, with acceptable toxicity, against platinum-sensitive/resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

A systematic review of platinum and taxane resistance from bench to clinic: An inverse relationship

We undertook a systematic review of the pre-clinical and clinical literature for studies investigating the relationship between platinum and taxane resistance. Medline was searched for (1) cell models of acquired drug resistance reporting platinum and taxane sensitivities and (2) clinical trials of platinum or taxane salvage therapy in ovarian cancer. One hundred and thirty-seven models of acquired drug resistance were identified. 68.1% of cisplatin-resistant cells were sensitive to paclitaxel and 66.7% of paclitaxel-resistant cells were sensitive to cisplatin. A similar inverse pattern was observed for cisplatin vs. docetaxel, carboplatin vs. paclitaxel and carboplatin vs. docetaxel. These associations were independent of cancer type, agents used to develop resistance and reported mechanisms of resistance. Sixty-five eligible clinical trials of paclitaxel-based salvage after platinum therapy were identified. Studies of single agent paclitaxel in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer where patients had previously recieved paclitaxel had a pooled response rate of 35.3%, n=232, compared to 22% in paclitaxel naïve patients n=1918 (p<0.01, Chi-squared). Suggesting that pre-treatment with paclitaxel may improve the response of salvage paclitaxel therapy. The response rate to paclitaxel/platinum combination regimens in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer was 79.5%, n=88 compared to 49.4%, n=85 for paclitaxel combined with other agents (p<0.001, Chi-squared), suggesting a positive interaction between taxanes and platinum. Therefore, the inverse relationship between platinum and taxanes resistance seen in cell models is mirrored in the clinical response to these agents in ovarian cancer. An understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible would be valuable in predicting response to salvage chemotherapy and may identify new therapeutic targets.

Prolonged topotecan infusion with cisplatin in the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer: An NYGOG and ECOG study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the toxicity and efficacy of combined therapy with cisplatin and prolonged infusion topotecan as front line therapy in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with previously untreated, measurable and non-measurable epithelial ovarian cancer, stages Ic-IV were eligible. Patients were treated with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by topotecan 0.3 to 0.4 mg/m(2)/day given as a continuous infusion over 14-21 days, every 28 days. Dose levels and duration of infusion were adjusted for toxicity as appropriate. Patients were evaluated for response to treatment and treatment toxicity by standard NYGOG criteria.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled. Among the 20 patients with post-surgical residual disease >2 cm, 80% [95% CI (56.3%, 94.3%)] demonstrated an objective response to therapy. The median progression-free survival for all 60 patients enrolled was 19.3 months with a median overall survival of 45.6 months given the median follow-up of 55 months (range 6-81 months). Five year survival is estimated to be 41%. Toxicity was observed in the first four patients treated with topotecan (0.4 mg/m(2)/day x 21 days) and dosing was continued at 0.3 mg/m(2)/day x 14 days thereafter. Of the 56 patients treated at the amended dose level, marrow suppression continued to be dose-limiting, with 86% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 55% experiencing grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia and 50% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 anemia. Nonetheless, only 11/245 cycles administered were associated with febrile neutropenia and/or infection (8 port-related). Other non-hematologic toxicity was as expected. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

This large, multicenter phase II study of prolonged infusion topotecan in combination with cisplatin demonstrated similar response, time to progression and survival compared with reported results of taxane and platinum combinations. Hematologic toxicity was greater but tolerated. Further studies investigating topotecan in combination with platinum therapy as a first line agent are warranted.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine in heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This multicenter phase II study evaluated feasibility, clinical efficacy, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and vinorelbine (VNR) in patients with platinum-paclitaxel pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients received prior treatment with platinum and paclitaxel. Thirty-two heavily pretreated (median number of chemotherapy regimens two, range one to six) ovarian cancer patients received treatment with PLD 30 mg/m(2) and VNR 30 mg/m(2) every three weeks for six cycles. Ten patients entered the pharmacokinetic study, five receiving the PLD-VNR and five the VNR-PLD sequence.

RESULTS

In 30 patients evaluated for response and toxicity, the overall response rate was 37% and 10% of patients achieved stable disease. Median time to progression and overall survival were 5.5 months (range 1-10) and 9 months (range 2-16), respectively. Toxicity was generally mild and reversible. VNR AUC(tot) and plasma levels were considerably higher in the PLD-VNR sequence.

CONCLUSIONS

The PLD-VNR regimen exhibits significant activity in heavily pretreated patients, is well tolerated and is associated with encouraging survival. Preliminary pharmacokinetic results suggest the PLD-VNR sequence for further clinical applications. This regimen should be considered as a treatment option in patients with chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer.

ZD0473 combined with other chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of solid malignancies

Platinum-based combination chemotherapy regimens are the mainstay of current treatments for advanced solid malignancies. Preclinical in vitro studies have shown synergism with ZD0473 in combination with several agents, including vinorelbine and topotecan. This paper reviews the tolerability and activity observed with ZD0473 in combination with vinorelbine or topotecan, in two Phase I dose-escalating studies in patients with advanced, solid, refractory malignancies. Twenty-four patients were included in the ZD0473 plus vinorelbine trial and were treated with doses of ZD0473 60-150 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 15-25 mg/m2. In this trial, dose-limiting toxicity comprised non-haematological events and the most common grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (54.2%), thrombocytopenia (29.2%) and anaemia (20.8%). Eleven patients were included in the ZD0473 plus topotecan trial and were treated with ZD0473 60-90 mg/m2 and topotecan 0.5 mg/m2/day for 3 or 5 days. In this trial, dose-limiting toxicity comprised haematological events and the most common grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (63.6%), neutropenia (36.4%) and anaemia (18.2%). No objective responses were observed in either trial, but disease stabilisation occurred in 29.2% and 27.3% of patients in the vinorelbine and topotecan trials, respectively.

Topotecan preceded by oxaliplatin using a 3 week schedule: a phase I study in advanced cancer patients

Combinations of topoisomerase I (topo I) poisons and platinum derivatives have synergistic antitumoral effects. However, their clinical development is limited by supra-additive haematological toxicity. The aim of this study was to determine whether sustained doses of topotecan and oxaliplatin could be achieved using a synergistic sequence. 34 advanced cancer patients and 186 cycles were evaluable for toxicity over five dosing levels. Oxaliplatin at 85-110 mg/m(2) was given on day 1, followed by topotecan 0.5-1.25 mg/m(2)/day x 5 from day 1 to 5, every 3 weeks. Plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of total and ultrafiltrable platinum, total and lactone forms of topotecan were determined in the first cycle. The dose-limiting toxicity (DT) was identified as grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The occurrence of grade 4 thrombocytopenia did not correlate with topotecan PK, but it did with the patient's characteristics. Severe thrombocytopenia was seen in 1/8 of patients without clinical or biological evidence of malnutrition, with a creatinine clearance higher than 1 ml/s, and no more than two previous chemotherapy regimens, while it was seen in 8/10 patients with one of these characteristics (P<0.004). In conclusion, the recommended doses of oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2) and topotecan 1 mg/m(2)/day, every 3 weeks can be administered to patients with a favourable general status and pretreatment characteristics and a phase II study is worthwhile in ovarian cancer patients.

Phase II evaluation of 3-day topotecan with cyclophosphamide in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this trial was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a 3-day topotecan administration schedule in combination with cyclophosphamide in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent measurable ovarian cancer who had up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for the management of their disease participating in this phase II trial were to receive topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days in combination with cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m(2) on Day 1 every 21 days. Dose escalation and reductions were permitted.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients (median age = 65; range 37-84) were treated with this combination regimen. Seventeen were platinum-sensitive and 19 were platinum-resistant. A total of 169 cycles of chemotherapy was administered (median = 4; range 1-10). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (68.6%), neutropenic fever (7.1%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (18.3%), and requirement for blood transfusion (19.5%). Dose escalation was possible in 3 (8.3%), and dose reduction was required in 14 (38.9%) patients. Overall response rate was 25 and 44.5% stable disease. Median progression-free interval and overall survival was 5.4 and 23.5 months, respectively, independent of platinum sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The 3-day topotecan schedule in combination with cyclophosphamide appears to have good activity in recurrent ovarian cancer regardless of platinum sensitivity. Neutropenia was the only severe toxicity and was less prevalent than other reported trials of topotecan. This tolerable regimen offers patients more convenience and appears to have moderate activity.

A phase I/II study of topotecan in combination with carboplatin in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan given as escalating doses combined to a fixed dosage of carboplatin in late relapsing ovarian carcinomas.

METHODS

Women with relapsing ovarian cancer more than 6 months after first-line treatment were eligible for the study. In the first phase of the trial, patients were allocated to escalating topotecan doses with a carboplatin fixed dose (AUC 5, according to Cockcroft's formula). If no "severe" adverse event occurred in 1 or more of the patients, the topotecan dose was increased. The starting dose of topotecan was 0.50 mg/m(2)/day, for 3 consecutive days, and the dose step was of 0.25 mg/m(2)/day, till 1.5 mg/m(2)/day. The study progressed then in a phase II trial.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients entered the trial. Twenty took part in the escalating topotecan dose phase (4 per dose level, 0.50, 0.75, 1, 1.25, and 1.50 mg/m(2)/day) and 19 in the phase II. No severe adverse event was observed in the phase I of the trial, so the MTD was not reached. In the phase II trial topotecan was given to 1 mg/m(2)/day. Overall grade 3-4 neutropenia, lasting 7 days or less, was observed in 58.9% (23 patients). Thrombocytopenia occurred in 30.8% (12 patients) and grade 3 anemia in 25.6% (10 patients) of subjects. No life-threatening event occurred. Platelets or red blood cell transfusions were given in three cases (7.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This daily-times-3-day schedule of topotecan in combination with carboplatin is safe.