Pupillary dilatation and driving in diabetic patients

[Impact of mydriatic eyedrops on distance visual acuity in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration]

PURPOSE

To demonstrate a decrease in distance visual acuity (VA) following instillation of mydriatic eyedrops in eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective assessment in clinical practice was conducted in our ophthalmology department at the University Hospital of Tours from 7/19/2018 to 8/29/2018. Distance (ETDRS) and near (Parinaud) VA were assessed before and after instilling one drop each of tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 10% in the 40 included eyes with exudative AMD.

RESULTS

The mean difference in distance VA before and after pupillary dilation (PD) was 0.06 LogMAR (SD=0.14) (P<0.01), i.e. -3.05 letters read (SD=7.52) on the ETDRS chart (P=0.01). For near VA, the mean difference was 0.16 LogMAR (SD=0.16) (P<0.001), i.e. -1.58 paragraphs read (SD=1.63) on the Parinaud chart (P<0.001).

DISCUSSION

The absence of a clinically significant loss in post-dilation distance VA for exudative AMD could be explained by negligible glare coming from the ETDRS chart, milder photophobia, low pre-dilation VA's and a balance between higher order optical aberrations and diffraction. The opposite result for near VA could essentially be explained by greater glare induced by the light illuminating the Parinaud chart.

CONCLUSION

Our primary goal was not achieved. A study presuming the absence of a clinically significant decrease in post-dilation distance VA would be necessary to consider directly measuring post-dilation VA in eyes with exudative AMD in our daily practice.

Comparison between Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 7-field retinal photos and non-mydriatic, mydriatic and mydriatic steered widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for assessment of diabetic retinopathy

AIMS

To compare non-mydriatic, mydriatic and steered mydriatic widefield retinal images with mydriatic 7-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-standards in grading diabetic retinopathy (DR).

METHODS

We examined 95 patients (190 eyes) with type 1 diabetes. A non-mydriatic, a mydriatic and four steered mydriatic 200° widefield retinal images were captured (Optos 200Tx, Optos plc, Dunfermline, Scotland) and compared to mydriatic 7-field 45° ETDRS images (Topcon 3D OCT-2000, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan). Images were graded for DR according to ETDRS-protocol by a trained and certified grader masked to the results of the corresponding grading. For agreement kappa-statistics were used.

RESULTS

Exact level agreement with 7-field images was found in 76.3%, 76.1% and 70.7% for non-mydriatic, mydriatic and steered mydriatic widefield images, respectively. Corresponding values for one-level agreement were 99.0%, 98.9% and 99.5%, respectively. Non-mydriatic matched mydriatic widefield images almost fully with exact and one-level agreement of 96.8% and 100.0%, respectively. Mydriatic steered images resulted in higher grading in 24 eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Widefield images matched 7-field images favorably. Widefield images can be captured without pupil-dilation and only one image is needed. However, because of overlapping eyelashes and distortion some lesion might be missed. Mydriatic steered images in selected cases may solve some of these problems.

25th RCOphth Congress, President's Session paper: 25 years of progress in medical retina

The quarter century since the foundation of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists has coincided with immense change in the subspecialty of medical retina, which has moved from being the province of a few dedicated enthusiasts to being an integral, core part of ophthalmology in every eye department. In age-related macular degeneration, there has been a move away from targeted, destructive laser therapy, dependent on fluorescein angiography to intravitreal injection therapy of anti-growth factor agents, largely guided by optical coherence tomography. As a result of these changes, ophthalmologists have witnessed a marked improvement in visual outcomes for their patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), while at the same time developing and enacting entirely novel ways of delivering care. In the field of diabetic retinopathy, this period also saw advances in laser technology and a move away from highly destructive laser photocoagulation treatment to gentler retinal laser treatments. The introduction of intravitreal therapies, both steroids and anti-growth factor agents, has further advanced the treatment of diabetic macular oedema. This era has also seen in the United Kingdom the introduction of a coordinated national diabetic retinopathy screening programme, which offers an increasing hope that the burden of blindness from diabetic eye disease can be lessened. Exciting future advances in retinal imaging, genetics, and pharmacology will allow us to further improve outcomes for our patients and for ophthalmologists specialising in medical retina, the future looks very exciting but increasingly busy.

Eye drop neurology

Eye drops can help to diagnose and prevent complications of neurological disorders. Guttae ophthalmicae (eye drops) are generally safe because the drugs rarely achieve significant systemic concentrations, although there are rare exceptions. This article covers contemporary pharmacological pupil testing; how to dilate a pupil safely; common reasons why pupils do not respond to drops; and corneal lubrication to prevent complications of weak eye closure.

The anterior segment of the eye in diabetes

Purpose

A prospective study to examine the anterior segment of the eye in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Materials and methods

The anterior segments of the eyes of 181 patients with diabetes mellitus were examined. The commonest finding in the lids was warts, followed by poliosis and chalazia, and, in the conjunctiva, tortuous conjunctival vessels inferiorly (36.50%), pterygium (14.92%), and pingueculum (14.37%). Corneal sensitivity was reduced in 25 (13.80%) patients. Iris atrophy was the commonest finding in the iris. Dilatation of the pupil was delayed in 34 (18.79%) patients. Cataract was found in 119 (65.75%) patients. Forty-one (22.65%) patients had intraocular pressure greater than 21 mmHg. Seven (3.87%) patients, four (2.21%) patients, and one (0.55%) patient had seventh, third, and fourth palsy, respectively. No patient had sixth nerve palsy.

Conclusion

Primary care physicians and other allied health care professionals who are first in contact with patients are enjoined to familiarize themselves with the anterior segment features of diabetes mellitus and take necessary action when they are detected.

Screening for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of pupillary dilation on image quality and certitude of screening diabetic retinopathy by trained endocrinologists using a digital nonmydriatic camera.

DESIGN

Prospective, comparative, observational case series.

METHODS

One hundred fifty patients with diabetes attending a hospital-based photographic screening clinic had five-field (45 degree) digital retinal imaging and mosaic construction, first through dark-adapted pupils, then after a single application of tropicamide 1%. The 600 sets of images (150 patients, 300 eyes, before and after dilation) were graded independently and in a blinded manner by two endocrinologists and two ophthalmologists, with the consensual opinion on dilated images of the latter serving as the gold standard. The criteria of evaluation were assessment of image quality and certitude of detecting and grading retinopathy.

RESULTS

Of 300 eyes, pharmacological mydriasis improved image quality, with an increase in the number of eyes with five good images from seven to 160 and good-quality mosaics from 99 to 233. Dilation allowed better identification of maculopathy in the second eye because there was a decrease in ungradeable central images from 127 to 15 eyes. Dilation increased the number of eyes having retinopathy detected with certainty from 153 to 252 and graded with certainty from 173 to 277. No adverse effects were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Single application of tropicamide 1% significantly improves image quality and certitude of screening diabetic retinopathy with nonmydriatic camera by endocrinologists.

Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease

AIMS

To assess the effects of (1) mydriasis and (2) single versus three field photography on screening for diabetic eye disease using digital photography

METHOD

Slit lamp examination findings were compared to digital fundal photographs for the detection of any retinopathy and for referable retinopathy in 398 patients (794 eyes). A Topcon TRC-NW6S digital non-mydriatic fundus camera was used. Three photographic strategies were used: undilated single field, dilated single field, and dilated multiple fields. The photographs were presented in random order to one of two retinal screeners. For the single field photographs the screeners were masked to the use of mydriatics. In 13% of fundal photographs, grading was performed by both, rather than just one grader.

RESULTS

Mydriasis reduced the proportion of ungradable photographs from 26% to 5% (p<0.001). Neither mydriasis nor three field photography improved the sensitivity or specificity for the detection of any retinopathy or of referable retinopathy when compared with undilated single field photography. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting referable retinopathy using undilated single field photography was 77% (95% CI 71 to 84) and 95 % (95% CI 93 to 97) respectively. Using dilated single field photography the figures were 81% (95% CI 76 to 87) and 92% (95% CI 90 to 94) respectively. Using dilated three field photography the figures were 83% (95% CI 78 to 88) and 93% (95% CI 91 to 96) respectively. Intergrader reliability for the detection of referable retinopathy in gradable photographs was excellent (Kappa values 0.86-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Mydriasis reduces the technical failure rate. Mydriasis and the three field photography as used in this study do not increase the sensitivity or specificity of detecting diabetic retinopathy.

Pupil dilatation does affect some aspects of daytime driving performance

AIMS

To examine the effects of pupil dilatation on driving performance and determine whether this was related to changes in standard measures of visual function.

METHODS

The driving and vision performance of 16 young, visually normal participants was measured with both normal and dilated pupils. Pupils were dilated with 1% tropicamide. Driving performance was measured under daytime conditions on a closed road circuit that was free of other vehicles and has been used in previous studies of driving performance. Measures included road sign detection and recognition, hazard detection and avoidance, gap perception and negotiation, driving reaction times and time to complete the circuit. Visual performance measures included high contrast visual acuity, Pelli-Robson letter contrast sensitivity, and glare sensitivity.

RESULTS

Pupil dilatation significantly (p<0.05) decreased the ability of participants to recognise low contrast hazards and avoid them, decreased their visual acuity and contrast sensitivity and increased glare sensitivity. The decreases in vision performance were not, however, significantly related to the decrement in driving performance.

CONCLUSION

Pupil dilatation can impair selected aspects of driving and vision performance and patients should be cautioned about these possible effects.

Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a cause for concern in people who drive

AIMS

To report a case of a road traffic accident in a lady driving home from a diabetes clinic after pupillary dilatation. We also present the findings of a questionnaire survey of health professionals to elicit their practice in dealing with such patients.

METHODS

We present the case report of a lady having a road traffic accident on her way back from a retinal screening appointment after having had pupillary dilatation. A subsequent postal questionnaire survey was undertaken to find out current practice in screening patients who drive on the day of their retinal screening.

RESULTS

A lady was involved in a road traffic accident whilst returning home after retinal screening. Her motor insurance company refused to cover subsequent claims for damage because her pupils had been dilated. She was also prosecuted by the police for driving without valid motor insurance. We conducted a postal survey of 500 health care workers including ophthalmologists, optometrists, diabetologists and general practitioners regarding the use of dilating drops in people with diabetes who intend to drive. Analysis of 320 valid responses confirmed that there is no consistent practice with regard to either the use of dilating drops in drivers or in ensuring that arrangements are made for subsequent adequate visual inspection in those whom dilatory drops are not instilled.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines, for use by health care professionals and people with diabetes, are clearly required regarding the use of pupillary dilating drops in drivers.

Driving ability after pupillary dilatation

BACKGROUND

The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' guidelines and Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) recommend that a patient should not drive with dilated pupils based on the rationale that vision may be compromised in acuity and ability to tolerate glare. Arguments exist against these recommendations suggesting that pupillary dilatation does not have any real bearings on driving ability. Aim To determine the effects of pupillary dilatation on the ability to drive.

METHODS

The study was randomised and prospective. A total of 28 patients had their visual parameters (distance vision, near vision, licence plate reading at 20 m or shorter, and glare) measured and analysed pre- and post-tropicamide 1% dilatation. Paired two-tailed Student's t-test and chi(2)-test were used in the analysis.

RESULTS

At 20 min, following instillation of one drop of tropicamide 1% there is a significant reduction in visual acuity (VA), for distance Snellen and near. There is a significant reduction in the number of people who could read the licence plate at 20 m. Subjective glare assessment changed from 'none' (average score) in the undilated state to 'mild' in the dilated states. The overall patient feedback indicated that a significant 14% believed they would find it difficult to drive postdilatation.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the rationale behind disallowing driving following pupillary dilatation. The risks to safe driving are proved significant as a result of significant reduction in visual quality and quantity after dilatation.

Pupil signs of sympathetic autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Pupillary autonomic neuropathy is considered an early sign of the development of systemic autonomic neuropathy. Sympathetic denervation is related to the duration of diabetes and the development of systemic autonomic dysfunction. We investigated pupil responsiveness to directly and indirectly acting sympathomimetics in type 1 diabetic patients with and without long-term complications, defined as cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN), peripheral sensomotor neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy, and in healthy subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 47 randomly chosen type 1 diabetic patients and 20 healthy subjects were selected for this study. Patients were divided into groups determined by whether they had long-term diabetic complications. Pharmacological tests were performed with cocaine 4%, epinephrine 1%, and pholedrine 5% eye drops. Horizontal pupil diameter (HPD) was measured at the beginning of the pharmacological tests and at defined time points after instillation of the eye drops.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis showed a significantly smaller HPD in the patients before instillating eye drops (P = 0.011). In particular, the HPD was significantly smaller in the patient group without CAN when compared with healthy subjects (P = 0.004). Maximal cocaine reaction was diminished in the complication group (P < 0.001). Epinephrine test, visual acuity, ocular pressure, and HbA(1c) did not differ in patients with or without long-term complications. The noncomplication group showed no significant differences in pupillary responses as compared with healthy subjects. The complication group showed a smaller HPD (P = 0.022), reduced pupillary responses in the cocaine (P = 0.037) and pholedrine tests (P < 0.001), and anisocor pupil sizes after instillation of the eye drops (P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results clearly show that sympathetic denervation does exist in the pupil of diabetic patients and that it can be rapidly assessed using the cocaine test. These data and the results of the epinephrine test suggest a mixed pre- and postganglionic dysfunction of the sympathetic plexus. The significant smaller HPD in patients without CAN compared with that of healthy subjects could be a sign for early involvement of the pupil function before cardiac manifestation of systemic autonomic diabetic neuropathy.

Mydriasis and glaucoma: exploding the myth. A systematic review

AIMS

To investigate the risk of inducing acute glaucoma following mydriasis.

METHODS

Systematic review of published research 1933-1999.

RESULTS

The risk of inducing acute glaucoma following mydriasis with tropicamide alone is close to zero, no case being identified. The risk with long-acting or combined agents is between 1 in 3,380 and 1 in 20,000. The presence of chronic glaucoma constitutes no additional risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Mydriasis with tropicamide alone is safe even in people with chronic glaucoma. It should be advised in all patients when thorough retinal examination is indicated.

The effect of pupil dilation with tropicamide on vision and driving simulator performance

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of pupil dilation on vision and driving ability.

METHODS

A series of tests on various parameters of visual function and driving simulator performance were performed on 12 healthy drivers, before and after pupil dilation using guttae tropicamide 1%. A driving simulator (Transport Research Laboratory) was used to measure reaction time (RT), speed maintenance and steering accuracy. Tests of basic visual function included high- and low-contrast visual acuity (HCVA and LCVA), Pelli-Robson contrast threshold (CT) and Goldmann perimetry (FIELDS). Useful Field of View (UFOV--a test of visual attention) was also undertaken. The mean differences in the pre- and post-dilatation measurements were tested for statistical significance at the 95% level using one-tail paired t-tests.

RESULTS

Pupillary dilation resulted in a statistically significant deterioration in CT and HCVA only. Five of 12 drivers also exhibited deterioration in LCVA, CT and RT. Little evidence emerged for deterioration in FIELDS and UFOV. Also, 7 of 12 drivers appeared to adjust their driving behaviour by reducing their speed on the driving simulator, leading to improved steering accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pupillary dilation may lead to a decrease in vision and daylight driving performance in young people. A larger study, including a broader spectrum of subjects, is warranted before guidelines can be recommended.

A systematic review of drug induced ocular reactions in diabetes

AIMS

To conduct a systematic review of drug induced adverse ocular effects in diabetes to determine if this approach identified any previously unrecognised adverse drug effects; to make a preliminary assessment of the feasibility of this approach in identifying adverse drug reactions; and to assess the current accessibility of this information to prescribing physicians.

METHODS

Literature search of online biomedical databases. The search strategy linked eye disorders with adverse drug reactions and diabetes. Source journals were classified as medical, pharmaceutical, diabetes related, or ophthalmological. It was determined whether the reactions identified were recorded in drug datasheets and the British National Formulary.

RESULTS

63 references fulfilled the selection criteria, of which 45 were considered to be relevant to the study. The majority of these were case reports but cross sectional surveys, case-control and cohort studies, and review articles were also identified. 61% of the reactions were not recorded in the British National Formulary and 41% were not recorded in the datasheets. 55% appeared in specialist ophthalmology journals.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a feasible approach to the identification of adverse drug reactions. Adverse reactions not listed in the most commonly used reference sources were found. The majority were published in specialist ophthalmology journals which might not be seen by prescribing physicians.

Ocular manifestations of diabetes mellitus

The ocular complications of diabetes mellitus are numerous and include retinopathy, cataract, uveitis, and neurophthalmic disorders. A review of the current literature shows that the emphasis has changed from the laser and surgical management of pre-existent retinopathy to the development of cohesive multidisciplinary screening and education programs, and to a better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie disease. The role of associated and potentially modifiable systemic factors is also now recognized. Early intervention with systemic and local therapies may soon provide hope for the better management of diabetic eye disease.