Cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of centrosomes: localization of phosphopeptide specific antibodies to the centrosome

Interaction of the growth and tumour suppressor NORE1A with microtubules is not required for its growth-suppressive function

BACKGROUND

The NORE1 protein was identified in a yeast two-hybrid screen as a Ras effector that binds Ras protein in a GTP-dependent manner. NORE1A is a growth and tumour suppressor that is inactivated in a variety of cancers. In transformed human cells, both full-length NORE1A protein and its effector domain alone (amino acids 191-363) are localized to microtubules and centrosomes. However, the mechanism by which NORE1A associates with these cytoskeletal elements is not known; furthermore, whether centrosomally-associated or microtubule-associated NORE1A suppresses tumour cell growth has not been yet established.

FINDINGS

We have shown that purified NORE1A fails to bind to microtubules in vitro suggesting that other protein(s) mediate NORE1A-microtubule association. Using mass-spectrometry, we identified the Microtubule-Associated Protein 1B (MAP1B) and its homologue C19ORF5 as NORE1A interaction partners. Suppression of C19ORF5 expression by RNA interference (RNAi) and immunodepletion of C19ORF5 protein from cell extracts showed that binding of NORE1A to microtubules is not dependent on C19ORF5. Conversely, RNAi suppression of MAP1B revealed that MAP1B is required for association of NORE1A with microtubules. RNAi-mediated depletion of C19ORF5 or MAP1B did not prevent centrosomal localization of NORE1A. Moreover, the depletion of C19ORF5 or MAP1B did not prevent NORE1A's ability to suppress tumour cell growth.

CONCLUSION

The interaction of NORE1A with microtubules is mediated by MAP1B, but not C19ORF5 protein. Interaction of NORE1A with centrosomes is not dependent on C19ORF5 or MAP1B, and appears to involve a different mechanism independent of binding to microtubules. The NORE1A microtubular localization is not required for growth suppression.

Microtubule-associated protein 1B, a growth-associated and phosphorylated scaffold protein

Microtubule-associated protein 1B, MAP1B, is one of the major growth associated and cytoskeletal proteins in neuronal and glial cells. It is present as a full length protein or may be fragmented into a heavy chain and a light chain. It is essential to stabilize microtubules during the elongation of dendrites and neurites and is involved in the dynamics of morphological structures such as microtubules, microfilaments and growth cones. MAP1B function is modulated by phosphorylation and influences microtubule stability, microfilaments and growth cone motility. Considering its large size, several interactions with a variety of other proteins have been reported and there is increasing evidence that MAP1B plays a crucial role in the stability of the cytoskeleton and may have other cellular functions. Here we review molecular and functional aspects of this protein, evoke its role as a scaffold protein and have a look at several pathologies where the protein may be involved.

Deregulation of the centrosome cycle and the origin of chromosomal instability in cancer

Although we have begun to tap into the mechanisms behind Boveri's initial observation that supernumerary centrosomes cause chromosome missegregation in sea urchin eggs, there is still much left to discover with regard to chromosomal instability in cancer. Many of the molecular players involved in regulation of the centrosome and cell cycles, and the coupling of the two cycles to produce a bipolar mitotic spindle have been identified. One theme that has become apparent is that cross talk and interrelatedness of the pathways serve to provide redundant mechanisms to maintain genomic integrity. In spite of this, cells occasionally fall prey to insults that initiate and maintain the chromosomal instability that results in viable malignant tumours. Deregulation of centrosome structure is an integral aspect of the origin of chromosomal instability in many cancers. There are numerous routes to centrosome amplification including: environmental insults such as ionising radiation and exposure to estrogen (Li et al., 2005); failure of cytokinesis; and activating mutations in key regulators of centrosome structure and function. There are two models for initiation of centrosome amplification (Figure 2). In the first, centrosome duplication and chromosome replication remain coupled and cells enter G2 with 4N chromosomes and duplicated centrosomes. However, these cells may fail to complete mitosis, and thus reenter G1 as tetraploid cells with amplified centrosomes. In the second, the centrosome cycle is uncoupled from chromosome replication and cells go through one or more rounds of centriole/centrosome duplication in the absence of chromosome replication. If these cells then go through chromosome replication accompanied by another round of centrosome duplication, cells complete G2 with 4N chromosomes and more than 2 centrosomes, and therefore are predisposed to generate multipolar mitotic spindles. Fragmentation of centrosomes due to ionising radiation is a variation of the second model. Once centrosome amplification is present, even in a diploid cell, that cell has the potential to yield viable aneuploid progeny. The telophase cell in Figure 3C illustrates this scenario. In a normal telophase configuration, the total number of chromosomes is 92 (resulting from the segregation of 46 pairs of chromatids), with each daughter nucleus containing 46 individual chromosomes. Based on the number of kinetochore signals present, the lower nucleus in Figure 3C has approximately 28 chromosomes, and the elongate upper nucleus has approximately 60, for a total of 88. Due to superimposition of kinetochores in this maximum projection image, 88 is an underestimate of the actual number of kinetochores and is not significantly different from the expected total of 92. A cell resulting from the lower nucleus with only around 28 chromosomes would probably not be viable, much as Boveri's experiments indicated. However, the upper nucleus with at least 60 chromosomes could be viable. This cell would enter G1 as hypotriploid (69 chromosomes = triploid) with 2 centrosomes. During S and G2, the centrosomes and chromosomes would double, and the following mitosis could be tetrapolar with a 6N chromosome content. When centrosome amplification is accompanied by permissive lapses in cell cycle checkpoints, the potential for malignant growth is present. These lapses could result from specific genetic mutations and amplifications, epigenetic gene silencing, or from massive chromosomal instability caused by the centrosome amplification. Centrosome amplification, therefore, can serve to exacerbate and/or generate genetic instabilities associated with cancers.

Two-way traffic: centrosomes and the cell cycle

The well recognized activities of the mammalian centrosome--microtubule nucleation, duplication, and organization of the primary cilium--are under the control of the cell cycle. However, the centrosome is more than just a follower of the cell cycle; it can also be essential for the cell to transit G1 and enter S phase. How the centrosome influences G1 progression is a mystery.

Centrosome amplification and the origin of chromosomal instability in breast cancer

The development and progression of aggressive breast cancer is characterized by genomic instability leading to multiple genetic defects, phenotypic diversity, chemoresistance, and poor outcome. Centrosome abnormalities have been implicated in the origin of chromosomal instability through the development of multipolar mitotic spindles. Breast tumor centrosomes display characteristic structural abnormalities, termed centrosome amplification , including: increase in centrosome number and volume, accumulation of excess pericentriolar material, supernumerary centrioles, and inappropriate phosphorylation of centrosome proteins. In addition, breast tumor centrosomes also show functional abnormalities characterized by inappropriate centrosome duplication during the cell cycle and nucleation of unusually large microtubule arrays. These observations have important implications for understanding the mechanisms underlying genomic instability and loss of cell polarity in cancer. This review focuses on the coordination of the centrosome, DNA, and cell cycles in normal cells and their deregulation resulting in centrosome amplification and chromosomal instability in the development and progression of breast cancer.

Phosphorylation of centrin during the cell cycle and its role in centriole separation preceding centrosome duplication

Once during each cell cycle, mitotic spindle poles arise by separation of newly duplicated centrosomes. We report here the involvement of phosphorylation of the centrosomal protein centrin in this process. We show that centrin is phosphorylated at serine residue 170 during the G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle. Indirect immunofluorescence staining of HeLa cells using a phosphocentrin-specific antibody reveals intense labeling of mitotic spindle poles during prophase and metaphase of the cell division cycle, with diminished staining of anaphase and no staining of telophase and interphase centrosomes. Cultured cells undergo a dramatic increase in centrin phosphorylation following the experimental elevation of PKA activity, suggesting that this kinase can phosphorylate centrin in vivo. Surprisingly, elevated PKA activity also resulted intense phosphocentrin antibody labeling of interphase centrosomes and in the concurrent movement of individual centrioles apart from one another. Taken together, these results suggest that centrin phosphorylation signals the separation of centrosomes at prophase and implicates centrin phosphorylation in centriole separation that normally precedes centrosome duplication.

Ran-GTP coordinates regulation of microtubule nucleation and dynamics during mitotic-spindle assembly

It was recently reported that GTP-bound Ran induces microtubule and pseudo-spindle assembly in mitotic egg extracts in the absence of chromosomes and centrosomes, and that chromosomes induce the assembly of spindle microtubules in these extracts through generation of Ran-GTP. Here we examine the effects of Ran-GTP on microtubule nucleation and dynamics and show that Ran-GTP has independent effects on both the nucleation activity of centrosomes and the stability of centrosomal microtubules. We also show that inhibition of Ran-GTP production, even in the presence of duplicated centrosomes and kinetochores, prevents assembly of a bipolar spindle in M-phase extracts.