Change in hepatic arterial hemodynamics induced by hepatocellular carcinoma detected with Doppler sonography

Physical hemodynamic interaction between portal venous and hepatic arterial blood flow in humans

OBJECTIVE

The hepatic arterial end-diastolic velocity (HAEDV) is normally equal to portal vein peak velocity (PVPV). However, there is no report of quantitative measurement that HAEDV was equal to PVPV. We investigated the interaction in PVPV and HAEDV in both chronic and acute hepatic hemodynamic changes.

METHODS

One hundred and nineteen patients (54 with cirrhosis, 23 with chronic hepatitis, and 42 with no diffuse liver disorder) were enrolled. We investigated the differences in PVPV and HAEDV among the patients with and without liver disorder. In addition, we measured the intraindividual changes in HAEDV when PVPV was mechanically changed by percutaneous isolated hepatic perfusion in six patients and by percutaneous transhepatic portal embolization (PTPE) in six more.

RESULTS

HAEDV was nearly equal to PVPV not only in patients with both normal and hepatitis but also in those with cirrhosis (PVPV-HAEDV = 3.0 +/- 5.2, 2.2 +/- 5.4, 2.3 +/- 6.5 cm/s, respectively). In the intraindividual study, both PVPV and HAEDV decreased during hepatic mechanical perfusion and HAEDV was equal to PVPV (8.2 +/- 2.8, 10.5 +/- 1.5 cm/s, respectively). After PTPE, PVPV was increased and hepatic arterial peak systolic velocity was reciprocally decreased. However, HAEDV was nearly equal to PVPV 7 days after PTPE (PVPV-HAEDV = 5.9 +/- 5.1 cm/s).

CONCLUSIONS

Since arterial end-diastolic velocity depends on the downstream vascular resistance, lower HAEDV in patients with cirrhosis was considered to reflect a high outflow resistance. If there is no collateral pathway, we consider that HAEDV may actually reflect sinusoidal resistance to the same degree as PVPV.

A comparison of treatment combinations with and without radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein and/or inferior vena cava tumor thrombus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential role of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have portal vein (PV) and/or inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombi.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred fifty-eight patients with HCC who had PV and/or IVC tumor thrombus were reviewed and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. Forty-four patients with HCC who received local limited EBRT (in addition to other treatment modalities) were classified as the EBRT group. The total radiation dose was 36-60 Gy (median, 50 Gy) and was focused on the tumor thrombi. One hundred fourteen patients with HCC who did not receive EBRT were selected from hospitalized patients with HCC who had PV and/or IVC thrombi during the same period; these were classified as the non-EBRT group, and their intrahepatic tumors were treated with transarterial chemoembolization or resection, on the basis of the patients' status. Parameters observed included survival rates and the tumor thrombus response to EBRT as seen on CT scan or MRI.

RESULTS

Of the 44 patients who received EBRT, 15 (34.1%) showed complete disappearance of tumor thrombi, 5 (11.4%) were in partial remission, 23 (52.3%) were stable in their tumor thrombi, and 1 (2.3%) showed disease progression at the end of the study period. The median survival was 8 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 34.8% in the EBRT group. In the non-EBRT group, the median survival and 1-year survival rates were 4 months and 11.4%, respectively. In stepwise multivariate analysis, EBRT showed a strongly protective value (relative risk = 0.324, p < 0.001). Survival was not related to intrahepatic tumor status in the non-EBRT patients. However, in the EBRT group, poorer prognosis was significantly related to intrahepatic multifocal or diffusion lesions, and the most common reason for death was liver failure caused by uncontrolled intrahepatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Although EBRT is palliative in intent, it is preferred for prolonging survival in the treatment of tumor thrombi.

Hepatic arterial blood flow in large hepatocellular carcinoma with or without portal vein thrombosis: assessment by transcutaneous duplex Doppler sonography

BACKGROUND

As liver cirrhosis progresses, the portal venous blood (PVBF) flow decreases, accompanied by an increase in hepatic arterial blood flow. Large hepatocellular carcinoma is a hypervascular tumour with a rapid growth, which seems to require an increase of the tumoral arterial blood flow. Furthermore, hepatocellular carcinoma is frequently associated with portal vein thrombosis, which subsequently impedes portal blood supply.

METHODS

The purpose of our study was to estimate alterations in the hepatic arterial blood flow in large hepatocellular carcinomas occurring in liver cirrhosis, in comparison with liver cirrhosis and controls. Liver blood flow measurements were determined by duplex Doppler sonography in 47 patients with large hepatocellular carcinomas (13 with portal vein thrombosis and 34 without this thrombosis), 42 liver cirrhosis patients and 30 controls. The Doppler perfusion index was calculated as the ratio of hepatic arterial blood flow to total hepatic blood flow.

RESULTS

The patients with liver cirrhosis had a significant increase of hepatic arterial blood flow as compared to controls (P < 0.001), accompanied by a significant reduction in PVBF (P < 0.005). As a result, the Doppler perfusion index was increased in patients with liver cirrhosis as compared to controls (P < 0.001). The hepatic arterial blood flow was increased in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma but without portal vein thrombosis as compared to the cirrhotic patients (P < 0.001), with a significant reduction of PVBF (P < 0.001). Hepatic arterial blood flow was also increased in patients with both hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombosis as compared to the patients without this thrombosis (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that in large hepatocellular carcinomas there is a decreased PVBF, accompanied by an increased hepatic arterial blood flow. The hepatic arterial buffer response seems to be active in hepatocellular carcinomas and maintains liver perfusion to adequate levels.

Arterioportal fistulas in patients with liver cirrhosis: usefulness of color Doppler US for screening

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of routine ultrasonographic (US) evaluation of the hepatic arterial resistive and pulsatility indexes and of the direction of portal venous blood flow for the diagnosis of intrahepatic arterioportal fistulas (APFs) in patients with liver cirrhosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In all patients with cirrhosis examined at one center over 4 years, the resistive (RI) and the pulsatility (PI) indexes in the right and left branches of the hepatic artery were evaluated with Doppler US. An APF was suspected when an RI decrease of at least 20% and a PI decrease of at least 30% were present in one hepatic lobe relative to values in the other lobe and portal blood flow in the lobe with the decreased values was reversed. The RI and PI in patients with an APF were compared with those in 75 patients with cirrhosis and without APFs at angiography.

RESULTS

Seven patients with an APF were identified. APFs suspected at Doppler US were always confirmed with angiography. The percent differences +/- SD in the RI and the PI between the two intrahepatic branches of the hepatic artery in patients with versus in patients without an APF were as follows: RI, 35% +/- 6 (range, 27%-42%) versus 5% +/- 4 (range, 0%-15%) (P: <.001); PI, 50% +/- 5 (range, 41%-58%) versus 11% +/- 7 (range, 0%-26%) (P: <.001).

CONCLUSION

The intrahepatic arterial resistive and pulsatility indexes and the direction of portal blood flow should be evaluated in routine screening for APFs in patients with liver cirrhosis.