Preclinical studies of chemotherapy and radiation therapy for pancreatic carcinoma

Phase I trial of strictly time-scheduled gemcitabine and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Maximal therapeutic gain in xenograft sarcoma and toxicity for jejunal mucosa is time dependent for concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy (RT). We used a time-dependent schedule to determine the maximal-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; Grade 4 hematologic or Grade 3 other toxicity).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 33), periampullary carcinoma (n = 1), or bile duct cancer (n = 2) were treated with 3-day conformal RT with 50.4 Gy (tumor, lymphatics) plus a 5.4-Gy boost. Concurrent cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d on Days 1-5 and 29-33) and gemcitabine (initially 600 mg/m(2), weekly on Fridays 68 h before RT) were administered. Because of DLT, the doses were reduced to 500 mg/m(2) weekly and then 500, 400, or 300 mg/m(2) on Days 2, 5, 26, 33.

RESULTS

DLT occurred at all dose levels of gemcitabine >300 mg/m(2). Fourteen patients were treated at the recommended Phase II dose of gemcitabine (300 mg/m(2)) without DLT. The response to chemoradiation allowed 10 of 30 initially unresectable patients with primary pancreatic carcinoma to undergo radical surgery, including a complete response in 2 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

At the recommended Phase II dose, chemoradiation with gemcitabine and cisplatin can be administered safely in pancreatic carcinoma. However, at higher dose levels, toxicity is severe and frequent. Patients with a chance for conversion to resection could benefit from this schedule.

Biological basis for chemo-radiotherapy interactions

For over 10 years, chemo-radiotherapeutic combinations have been used to treat locally advanced epithelial tumours. The rationale for these combinations relies on spatial cooperation or interaction between modalities. Interactions may take place (i) at the molecular level, with altered DNA repair or modification of the lesions induced by drugs or radiation, (ii) at the cellular level, notably through cytokinetic cooperation arising from differential sensitivity of the various compartments of the cell cycle to the drug or radiation, and (iii) at the tissue level, including reoxygenation, increased drug uptake or inhibition of repopulation or angiogenesis. Some mechanisms underlying interaction of radiation with cis-diammino-platinum (II) (cis-Pt), 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (5-FU), taxanes and gemcitabine are described. It is shown how various mechanisms including cell synchronisation and reoxygenation concur to paclitaxel-induced radiosensitisation. In the future, specific targeting of tumours, for example, with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or angiogenesis inhibitors, should be achieved in order to increase the therapeutic index.

A phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced, persistent, or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the response rate and toxicity of cis-platinum and gemcitabine in advanced, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

METHODS

From July 1997 to January 1999, we conducted a Phase II trial in patients with advanced, persistent, or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. The schedule employed 1250 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 and 50 mg/m(2) of cis-platinum on day 1 in a 21-day cycle. Eligibility criteria were a GOG performance status of 0-2, adequate bone marrow reserve, serum creatinine less than 1.8 mg%, and a lesion which could be measured in two dimensions. None of the patients had received prior chemotherapy other than radiation sensitizers. Standard GOG toxicity and response criteria were used.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were enrolled into the trial. Two patients were inevaluable because of inadequate trial of drug. Seventeen patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The median age of the patients was 47 years (range 24-72). The median number of cycles delivered was 5 (range 2-8). The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia and anemia was 2.4 and 1.2%, respectively. Two patients developed a single episode of grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. The overall response rate was 41% (7/17). There was 1 complete response of 14 months duration and 6 partial responses. Among those patients not previously irradiated, the response rate was 57% (4/7). Among the radiated patients, the response rate was 30% (3/10) with all responses occurring in the radiation field.

CONCLUSION

This combination of cis-platinum and gemcitabine is a well-tolerated regimen which exhibits high activity in advanced, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell cervical cancer.

Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region: phase III trial of the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group

OBJECTIVE

The survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil versus observation alone after surgery was investigated in patients with pancreatic head and periampullary cancers.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

A previous study of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in these cancers by the Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group of EORTC has been followed by other studies with conflicting results.

METHODS

Eligible patients with T1-2N0-1aM0 pancreatic head or T1-3N0-1aM0 periampullary cancer and histologically proven adenocarcinoma were randomized after resection.

RESULTS

Between 1987 and 1995, 218 patients were randomized (108 patients in the observation group, 110 patients in the treatment group). Eleven patients were ineligible (five in the observation group and six in the treatment group). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. One hundred fourteen patients (55%) had pancreatic cancer (54 in the observation group and 60 in the treatment group). In the treatment arm, 21 patients (20%) received no treatment because of postoperative complications or patient refusal. In the treatment group, only minor toxicity was observed. The median duration of survival was 19.0 months for the observation group and 24.5 months in the treatment group (log-rank, p = 0.208). The 2-year survival estimates were 41% and 51 %, respectively. The results when stratifying for tumor location showed a 2-year survival rate of 26% in the observation group and 34% in the treatment group (log-rank, p = 0.099) in pancreatic head cancer; in periampullary cancer, the 2-year survival rate was 63% in the observation group and 67% in the treatment group (log-rank, p = 0.737). No reduction of locoregional recurrence rates was apparent in the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant radiotherapy in combination with 5-fluorouracil is safe and well tolerated. However, the benefit in this study was small; routine use of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is not warranted as standard treatment in cancer of the head of the pancreas or periampullary region.

[The intensification of the radiotherapeutic effect on HeLa cells by gemcitabine]

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine (2'.2'-difluorodeoxycytidine; dFdC) is a new nucleoside analog with promising activity in different solid tumors in vivo and in vitro. As published up to now, combined with irradiation dFdC demonstrates a radiosensitizing effect on pancreas and colon carcinoma cell lines. We investigated the influence of dFdC on the radiosensitization of human squamous carcinoma cells of the cervix (HeLa-cells, ATCC CCL-2).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Under standardized conditions monolayer cultures of HeLa-cells were incubated in medium with dFdC for different times (4 to 24 hours) and exposed to different concentrations (0.003, 0.01 and 0.03 mumol/l). Irradiation (2 to 6 Gy, electron beam) followed immediately or 12 hours after dFdC-exposure. Cell survival was determined by colony forming assay. Using the linear-quadratic model cell survival curves were fit after correction for drug-induced cytotoxicity and the mean inactivation dose (MID) was calculated. Radiation enhancement was defined as the ratio MIDRT(= Control)/MIDRT + dFdC > 1.

RESULTS

Exposed to gemcitabine for 4 and 8 hours and followed by immediate irradiation the radiation enhancement ratio (Table 1) is 1.07 to 1.14 and 1.04 to 1.22, respectively, if dFdC concentration is > or = 0.01 to 0.03 mumol/l. Further increase of the irradiation effect is demonstrated in cells exposed to > or = 0.003 to 0.03 mumol/l dFdC for 16 and 24 hours (radiation enhancement ratio 1.08 to 2.0 and 1.08 to 2.48, respectively) (Figure 3). If irradiation is applied 12 hours after 24-hour-exposure (0.01 and 0.03 mumol/l) the enhancement ratio was 1.18 and 1.7, respectively (Figure 4).

CONCLUSIONS

In cell cultures the assays combining irradiation with dFdC demonstrate that dFdC is a potent radiation sensitizer of HeLa-cells. The effect of irradiation on cells pre-treated with non- and hardly cytotoxic concentrations of dFdC is increased in dependence of dose and time of exposure.

Radiosensitizing potential of gemcitabine (2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine) within the cell cycle in vitro

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine; dFdCyd) is a new deoxycitidine analog which exhibits substantial activity against solid tumors and radiosensitizing properties in vitro. To examine cell cycle-specific effects of a combined treatment with gemcitabine and radiation, the in vitro clonogenic survival of two different cell lines was measured for cells from log-phase culture, G1 and S-phase cells.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Chinese hamster (V79) and human colon carcinoma (Widr) cells were exposed to different radiation doses and for different points of time relative to gemcitabine treatment (2 h). Experiments were also carried out with different cell-cycle populations obtained after mitotic selection (V79) or after serum stimulation of plateau-phase cells (Widr). The resulting survival curves were analyzed according to the LQ model, and mean inactivation doses (MID) and the cell cycle-specific enhancement ratios (ER) were calculated from the survival curve parameters.

RESULTS

Effectiveness of combined treatment of log-phase cells was greatest when cells were irradiated at the end of the gemcitabine exposure [ER: 1.28 (V79), 1.24 (Widr)]. For later times after the removal of the drug, radiosensitization declined, approaching independent toxicity. From the time course of interactive-type damage decay half-life values of 75 min (V79) and 92 min (Widr) were derived. Gemcitabine did not radiosensitize G1 Widr cells or V79 cells from the G1/S border, but substantial radiosensitization was observed for the S-phase cell preparations [ER: 1.45 (V79-lateS), 1.57 (Widr)].

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of cells with gemcitabine immediately before irradiation eliminates, or at least greatly reduces, the variation in radiosensitivity during the cell cycle that is manifested by radioresistance during S phase. This reversal of S-phase radioresistance could imply that gemcitabine interferes with the potentially lethal damage repair/fixation pathway. Other approaches have been taken to overcome S-phase radioresistance, such as hyperthermia or densely ionizing radiation, and combined treatments with dFdCyd could prove of value to complement such efforts.