Phase II evaluation of topotecan for pediatric central nervous system tumors

Characterization and structure-activity relationships of indenoisoquinoline-derived topoisomerase I inhibitors in unsilencing the dormant Ube3a gene associated with Angelman syndrome

Background

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder lacking effective therapies. AS is caused by mutations in ubiquitin protein ligase E3A (UBE3A), which is genomically imprinted such that only the maternally inherited copy is expressed in neurons. We previously demonstrated that topoisomerase I (Top1) inhibitors could successfully reactivate the dormant paternal allele of Ube3a in neurons of a mouse model of AS. We also previously showed that one such Top1 inhibitor, topotecan, could unsilence paternal UBE3A in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons from individuals with AS. Although topotecan has been well-studied and is FDA-approved for cancer therapy, its limited CNS bioavailability will likely restrict the therapeutic use of topotecan in AS. The goal of this study was to identify additional Top1 inhibitors with similar efficacy as topotecan, with the expectation that these could be tested in the future for safety and CNS bioavailability to assess their potential as AS therapeutics.

Methods

We tested 13 indenoisoquinoline-derived Top1 inhibitors to identify compounds that unsilence the paternal allele of Ube3a in mouse neurons. Primary cortical neurons were isolated from embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5) mice with a Ube3a-YFP fluorescent tag on the paternal allele (Ube3a^m+/pYFP mice) or mice that lack the maternal Ube3a allele and hence model AS (Ube3a^m-/p+ mice). Neurons were cultured for 7 days, treated with drug for 72 h, and examined for paternal UBE3A protein expression by Western blot or fluorescence immunostaining. Dose responses of the compounds were determined across a log range of drug treatments, and cytotoxicity was tested using a luciferase-based assay.

Results

All 13 indenoisoquinoline-derived Top1 inhibitors unsilenced paternal Ube3a. Several compounds exhibited favorable paternal Ube3a unsilencing properties, similar to topotecan, and of these, indotecan (LMP400) was the most effective based on estimated E_max (maximum response of unsilencing paternal Ube3a) and EC₅₀ (half maximal effective concentration).

Conclusions

We provide pharmacological profiles of indenoisoquinoline-derived Top1 inhibitors as paternal Ube3a unsilencers. All 13 tested compounds were effective at unsilencing paternal Ube3a, although with variable efficacy and potency. Indotecan (LMP400) demonstrated a better pharmacological profile of Ube3a unsilencing compared to our previous lead compound, topotecan. Taken together, indotecan and its structural analogues are potential AS therapeutics whose translational potential in AS treatment should be further assessed.

Pediatric low-grade gliomas: how modern biology reshapes the clinical field

Low-grade gliomas represent the most frequent brain tumors arising during childhood. They are characterized by a broad and heterogeneous group of tumors that are currently classified by the WHO according to their morphological appearance. Here we review the clinical features of these tumors, current therapeutic strategies and the recent discovery of genomic alterations characteristic to these tumors. We further explore how these recent biological findings stand to transform the treatment for these tumors and impact the diagnostic criteria for pediatric low-grade gliomas.

Development and validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for topotecan determination in beagle dog plasma and its application in a bioequivalence study

Topotecan (TPT) is an important anti-cancer drug that inhibits topoisomerase I. A sensitive and robust liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method that potentially determines TPT in beagle dog plasma is needed for a bioequivalence study of TPT formulations. We developed and validated LC-MS/MS to evaluate TPT in beagle dog plasma in terms of specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy, stability, extraction recovery and matrix effect. Plasma samples were treated with an Ostro(TM) sorbent plate (a robust and effective tool) to eliminate phospholipids and proteins before analysis. TPT and camptothecin (internal standard) were separated on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 µm, 2.1 × 50 mm) with 0.1% formic acid and methanol as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min. TPT was analyzed using positive ion electrospray ionization in multiple-reaction monitoring mode. The obtained lower limit of quantitation was 1 ng/mL (signal-to-noise ratio > 10). The standard calibration curve for TPT was linear (correlation coefficient > 0.99) at the concentration range of 1-400 ng/mL. The intra-day and inter-day precision, accuracy, stability, extraction recovery and matrix effect of TPT were within the acceptable limits. The validated method was successfully applied in a bioequivalence study of TPT in healthy beagle dogs.

Escalating topotecan in combination with treosulfan has acceptable toxicity in advanced pediatric sarcomas

Patients with advanced pediatric sarcomas have a poor prognosis and novel combination therapies are needed to improve the response rates. Hematological and organ related toxicities have been observed when administering topotecan in combination with, e.g., high dose thiotepa. This study evaluates the toxicity of escalating doses of topotecan alone or in combination with thiotepa or treosulfan. We compared the toxicity including death of complication (DOC) of topotecan alone or in combination with thiotepa or treosulfan in advanced pediatric sarcomas (n = 12). Ten of 12 patients (0.83) suffered from advanced tumors of the Ewing family (i.e., bone or marrow metastases or relapse <24 month after diagnosis, including one neuroepithelial tumor of the kidney) and two from alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma stage IV (0.17). Median age was 15 years (range 5-28). Ratio of female to male was 1:1. Two patients received topotecan alone (1.25 mg/m(2) q 5d and 1.5 mg/m(2) q 5d), three patients received four courses of topotecan (2 mg/m(2) q d 1-5) in combination with thiotepa (100 mg/m(2) q d 1-5), and seven patients received topotecan (2 mg/m(2) q d 1-5) in combination with treosulfan (10g/m(2) q d 3-5). Overall toxicity was not different between all three groups; mean scores were 1.6, 1.8, and 1.7 according to WHO grading (Scale 0-4). Organ related toxicity ranged between 0 and 4 and was not different as well. DOC was 0/2, 1/3, and 0/7 patients respectively. Escalating therapy with topotecan in combination with treosulfan has acceptable toxicity and warrants further investigation in advanced pediatric sarcomas.

Investigation of intravenous delivery of nanoliposomal topotecan for activity against orthotopic glioblastoma xenografts

Achieving effective treatment outcomes for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) has been impeded by many obstacles, including the pharmacokinetic limitations of antitumor agents, such as topotecan (TPT). Here, we demonstrate that intravenous administration of a novel nanoliposomal formulation of TPT (nLS-TPT) extends the survival of mice with intracranial GBM xenografts, relative to administration of free TPT, because of improved biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of the liposome-formulated drug. In 3 distinct orthotopic GBM models, 3 weeks of biweekly intravenous therapy with nLS-TPT was sufficient to delay tumor growth and significantly extend animal survival, compared with treatment with free TPT (P ≤ .03 for each tumor tested). Analysis of intracranial tumors showed increased activation of cleaved caspase-3 and increased DNA fragmentation, both indicators of apoptotic response to treatment with nLS-TPT. These results demonstrate that intravenous delivery of nLS-TPT is a promising strategy in the treatment of GBM and support clinical investigation of this therapeutic approach.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of sunitinib in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: a children's oncology group study

PURPOSE

Sunitinib is an oral multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The purpose of this study was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic effects, and preliminary antitumor activity of sunitinib in a pediatric population.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients who were 2 to 21 years of age with refractory solid tumors were eligible if they had measurable or evaluable disease and met baseline organ function requirements. Patients received sunitinib once daily for 28 days followed by a 14-day break between each cycle. Dose levels of 15 and 20 mg/m(2)/d were evaluated, with dose escalation based on a 3 + 3 design. Sunitinib pharmacokinetics and biomarkers of angiogenesis were also evaluated during the first cycle.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were treated (median age 13.9 years; range, 3.9-20.6 years). The most common toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated liver transaminases, gastrointestinal symptoms, and fatigue. Two patients developed dose-limiting reductions in cardiac ejection fraction prompting a protocol amendment to exclude patients with previous exposure to anthracyclines or cardiac radiation. In patients without these cardiac risk factors, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 15 mg/m(2)/d. Steady-state plasma concentrations were reached by day 7. No objective responses were observed. Four patients with sarcoma and glioma had stable disease for 2 to 9 cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac toxicity precluded determination of a recommended dose for pediatric patients with previous anthracycline or cardiac radiation exposure. The MTD of sunitinib for patients without risk factors for cardiac toxicity is 15 mg/m(2)/d for 28 days followed by a 14-day break.

A phase II study of metronomic oral topotecan for recurrent childhood brain tumors

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for recurrent or refractory brain tumors in children is poor with conventional therapies. Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with good central nervous system (CNS) penetration following oral administration. Increased efficacy of topotecan has been demonstrated with prolonged low-dose daily treatment in pre-clinical models. To investigate further this drug delivered orally in pediatric CNS malignancies, a phase II study in children with recurrent or refractory brain tumors was performed.

PROCEDURE

Patients ≤ 21 years of age at diagnosis with a recurrent, progressive, or refractory primary CNS malignancy and measurable disease, were eligible. Patients enrolled into four strata: ependymoma (N = 4), high-grade glioma (HGG) (N = 6), brainstem glioma (BSG) (N = 13), and primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) (N = 8). Oral topotecan was administered once daily at a dose of 0.8 mg/m(2)/day for 21 consecutive days repeated every 28 days. Response and toxicity profiles were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were evaluable (median age 9.2 years; 10 males). Two objective responses were observed in PNET patients with disseminated tumor at study entry. These two patients remain alive and in remission 7 and 9.5 years off study. Four other patients (two BSG, one PNET, and one HGG) had stable disease (median 4.6 months). The most common toxicities were hematologic.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily oral topotecan at a dose of 0.8 mg/m(2)/day can be safely administered to children with recurrent or refractory brain tumors. This regimen identified activity in recurrent PNET. The prolonged progression free survival (PFS) in two PNET patients justifies consideration of this regimen in more advanced clinical trials.

P-glycoprotein related drug interactions: clinical importance and a consideration of disease states

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is the most characterized drug transporter in terms of its clinical relevance for pharmacokinetic disposition and interaction with other medicines. Clinically significant P-gp related drug interactions appear restricted to digoxin. P-gp may act as a major barrier to current and effective drug treatment in a number of diseases including cancer, AIDS, Alzheimer's and epilepsy due to its expression in tumors, lymphocytes, cell membranes of brain capillaries and the choroid plexus.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review summarizes the current understanding of P-gp structure/function, clinical importance of P-gp related drug interactions and the modulatory role this transporter may contribute towards drug efficacy in disease states such as cancer, AIDS, Alzheimer's and epilepsy.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will gain an understanding that the clinical relevance of P-gp in drug interactions is limited. In certain disease states, P-gp in barrier tissues can modulate changes in regional distribution.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

P-gp inhibition in isolation will not result in clinically important alterations in systemic exposure; however, P-gp transport may be of significance in barrier tissues (tumors, lymphocytes, brain) resulting in attenuated efficacy.

Childhood medulloblastoma: current status of biology and treatment

Medulloblastoma, a primitive neuro-ectodermal tumour that arises in the posterior fossa, is the most common malignant brain tumour occurring in childhood. Over the past half century, the long-term survival for children with medulloblastoma has improved remarkably from a certain fatal diagnosis to a cancer that is often curable. Although overall survival for children with non-disseminated and non-anaplastic medulloblastoma can approach 80%, the current multidisciplinary therapeutic approach is not without long-term sequelae. Chemotherapy has improved the long-term survival and allowed for reductions in the amount of radiation given, thereby reducing some of the long-term toxicities. In this review, we describe the current understanding of the basic biology of medulloblastoma and report on the current active chemotherapeutic agents utilized in medulloblastoma therapy. Ultimately, our understanding of the basic biology of medulloblastoma may lead to further advances in therapy by providing targets that are more specific and potentially less toxic.

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of topotecan in a phase I trial of topotecan, tamoxifen, and carboplatin, in the treatment of recurrent or refractory brain or spinal cord tumors

PURPOSE

This study was designed to ascertain the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximally tolerated doses of the combination of fixed-dose tamoxifen and carboplatin, with escalating doses of topotecan, and to determine the pharmacokinetics of topotecan in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.

METHODS

Tamoxifen 100 mg po bid, topotecan 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, or 1.0 mg/m(2)/d IV, administered as a 72 h continuous infusion on days 1-3, followed by carboplatin AUC = 3, IV on day 3. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients received 39 cycles of treatment: median 2, (range 1-5). The tumors included glioblastoma (6), anaplastic astrocytoma (2), metastatic non-small cell (3), small cell lung (2), and one each with medulloblastoma, ependymoma, and metastatic breast or colon carcinoma. The median Karnofsky performance status was 70% (range 60-90%) and age: 52 (range 24-75). Eleven patients were female and six male. Toxicities included thrombocytopenia (2), neutropenia without fever lasting 6 days (1), DVT (2), and emesis (1). Topotecan levels, total and lactone, were measured prior to the end of infusion in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). At 1.0 mg/m(2)/d, the median CSF/plasma ratio was 19.4% (range 15.1-59.1%). The total plasma topotecan in two pts with DLTs was 4.63 and 5.87 ng/ml, in three without DLTs at the same dose level the mean total plasma topotecan was 3.4 ng/ml (range 3.02-3.83). Plasma lactone levels were 33% of the total; CSF penetration was 20% of the total plasma levels. 4/8 pts with high-grade gliomas had stable disease (median: 3 cycles (range 2-5)). Two had minor responses. One patient with metastatic non-small cell and one with small cell lung cancer had objective PRs.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended phase II doses are: tamoxifen 100 mg po bid, topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2)/d IV continuous infusion for 72 h, followed by carboplatin AUC = 3 IV on day 3. Measurable topotecan levels, both total and lactone, are observed in the CSF.

Topotecan in combination with radiotherapy in unresectable glioblastoma: a phase 2 study

Improving glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treatment with radio-chemotherapy remains a challenge. Topotecan is an attractive option as it exhibits growth inhibition of human glioma as well as brain penetration. The present study assessed the combination of radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions/40 days) and topotecan (0.9 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 on weeks 1, 3 and 5) in 50 adults with histologically proven and untreated GBM. The incidence of non-hematological toxicities was low and grade 3-4 hematological toxicities were reported in 20 patients (mainly lymphopenia and neutropenia). Partial response and stabilization rates were 2% and 32%, respectively, with an overall time to progression of 12 weeks. One-year overall survival (OS) rate was 42%, with a median OS of 40 weeks. Topotecan in combination with radiotherapy was well tolerated. However, while response and stabilization concerned one-third of the patients, the study did not show increased benefits in terms of survival in patients with unresectable GBM.

Topoisomerase I inhibitors for the treatment of brain tumors

Patients with primary malignant brain tumors have a poor prognosis. Standard treatment includes surgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Topoisomerase I inhibitors such as topotecan and irinotecan (CPT-11) represent one class of chemotherapy drugs that have been used in this disease. Recent clinical trials have shown major antitumor activity in recurrent glioblastoma when adding the antiangiogenesis drug bevacizumab with CPT-11. The combination of targeted agents to topoisomerase I inhibitors represent a novel and promising approach. This review will summarize clinical trials with topoisomerase I inhibitors and discuss new treatment strategies for primary malignant brain tumors.

Synergy of karenitecin and mafosfamide in pediatric leukemia, medulloblastoma, and neuroblastoma cell lines

BACKGROUND

A major barrier to treatment of leptomeningeal disease is the lack of proven combination chemotherapy regimens for intrathecal administration. The purpose of this study was to determine the cytotoxic effects of karenitecin and mafosfamide in vitro against leukemia, medulloblastoma, and neuroblastoma cell lines.

PROCEDURE

A modified methyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay was used to determine the sensitivity of the cells to karenitecin and mafosfamide. Cells were exposed to drug for 72 hr, after which the number of surviving cells was quantitated. For drug combination experiments, cells were exposed to medium alone (controls), single drugs alone (mafosfamide only, karenitecin only) or to different concentrations of the combination of the two drugs (karenitecin + mafosfamide), for a total of 36 concentration pairs per plate. The universal response surface approach (URSA) was used to analyze the cytotoxic effects of the combination of karenitecin and mafosfamide.

RESULTS

The IC(50)s of karenitecin and mafosfamide for the various cell lines were similar. For both drugs nearly complete inhibition of cell growth was demonstrated at higher concentrations in all cell lines. In the neuroblastoma cell lines (SK-N-DZ; SK-N-SH) and the DAOY medulloblastoma cell line, the combination of karenitecin and mafosfamide were synergistic. In the D283 medulloblastoma and both the leukemia cell lines (JM1 and Molt-4), the drug interaction was additive. Antagonism was not seen in any cell line.

CONCLUSIONS

Karenitecin and mafosfamide are additive or synergistic in vitro against tumor types that disseminate to the leptomeninges. These results provide guidance for the choice of potential combination intrathecal regimens.

Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin and oral topotecan in eight children with relapsed high-grade malignant brain tumors

BACKGROUND

The combination of topoisomerase I and II chemotherapeutic agents has shown promising preclinical synergistic effects in the treatment of high-grade malignant brain tumors such as high-grade gliomas and choroid plexus carcinomas. To confirm the effectiveness of this treatment combination and determine its possible toxicity, we conducted a retrospective review of the charts of children who received the therapy.

METHODS

Patients with relapsed malignant brain tumors who were given an individualized treatment of pegylated (PEG)-liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan were included in our study. PEG-liposomal doxorubicin was given intravenously at a dosage of 30-40 mg/m(2) over 4 h once every 4 weeks. Additionally, an intravenous formulation of topotecan was given orally twice daily and was increased on an individual basis from a starting dosage of 0.3 mg/m(2) per application to a total daily dosage of 0.6 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

Eight patients were included. The main toxicity (NCI-CTC) after three cycles of the combination therapy was grade IV hematotoxicity (n = 3); grade III hematotoxicity (n = 2), grade III stomatitis (n = 1), grade III infection (n = 2), grade III diarrhea (n = 1); and grade II dermatitis (n = 1). In four patients, stable disease was achieved for 9, 23, more than 24, and more than 48 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The schedule of PEG-liposomal doxorubicin with 30-40 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks in combination with oral topotecan resulted in tumor response, but the toxicity was high. An individualized increasing dose of PEG-liposomal doxorubicin 10-20 mg/m(2) every two weeks is now recommended.

Topotecan Central Nervous System Penetration Is Altered by a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

A potential strategy to increase the efficacy of topotecan to treat central nervous system (CNS) malignancies is modulation of the activity of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters at the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers to enhance topotecan CNS penetration. This study focused on topotecan penetration into the brain extracellular fluid (ECF) and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a mouse model and the effect of modulation of ABC transporters at the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers by a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (gefitinib). After 4 and 8 mg/kg topotecan i.v., the brain ECF to plasma AUC ratio of unbound topotecan lactone was 0.21 +/- 0.04 and 0.61 +/- 0.16, respectively; the ventricular CSF to plasma AUC ratio was 1.18 +/- 0.10 and 1.30 +/- 0.13, respectively. To study the effect of gefitinib on topotecan CNS penetration, 200 mg/kg gefitinib was administered orally 1 hour before 4 mg/kg topotecan i.v. The brain ECF to plasma AUC ratio of unbound topotecan lactone increased by 1.6-fold to 0.35 +/- 0.04, which was significantly different from the ratio without gefitinib (P < 0.05). The ventricular CSF to plasma AUC ratio significantly decreased to 0.98 +/- 0.05 (P < 0.05). Breast cancer resistance protein 1 (Bcrp1), an efficient topotecan transporter, was detected at the apical aspect of the choroid plexus in FVB mice. In conclusion, topotecan brain ECF penetration was lower compared with ventricular CSF penetration. Gefitinib increased topotecan brain ECF penetration but decreased the ventricular CSF penetration. These results are consistent with the possibility that expression of Bcrp1 and P-glycoprotein at the apical side of the choroid plexus facilitates an influx transport mechanism across the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, resulting in high topotecan CSF penetration.

Clinical trial of CPT-11 and VM-26/VP-16 for patients with recurrent malignant brain tumors

CPT-11 is a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase I and has shown antitumor activity in brain xenografts and in clinical trials in recurrent/progressive malignant glioma. VM-26 and VP-16 are topoisomerase II inhibitors and have also shown activity in phase II trials. We performed a phase II trial of intravenous CPT-11 (125 mg/m2) followed 24 h later by VM-26 (125 mg/m2). VP-16 (125 mg/m2) was later substituted for VM-26 due to drug shortage. For patients on anticonvulsants, the starting dose for all drugs was 150 mg/m2. Drugs were given weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1-week rest. Twenty-five patients were entered into the study. Three patients (12%) had improvement in CAT/MRI brain scans (95% confidence interval 3-31%). Fatigue and myelosuppression, mainly leukopenia, were the main toxicities. This combination of the topoisomerase I inhibitor CPT-11 followed by the topoisomerase II inhibitor, VM-26 or VP-16, has shown modest antitumor activity comparable to that reported for each drug singly. Myelosuppression is the main toxicity when topoisomerase I and II inhibitors are combined together.

New drugs for the treatment of metastatic or refractory soft tissue sarcomas in children

Children with relapsed, recurrent or metastatic sarcomas represent a therapeutic challenge for the pediatric oncologist. Strategies for the development of newer therapies for children with these sarcomas have, in the past, been histology-specific. For example, drug development in rhabdomyosarcoma has relied upon the preclinical xenograft model, whereas therapies for pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas have mostly been derived from adult trials. The progress to date and the tools used in the treatment of advanced pediatric sarcomas will be summarized in this review.

Considerations on the Role of Chemotherapy and Modern Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Childhood Low Grade Glioma

The treatment of childhood low grade glioma (LGG), if not amenable to complete resection, quite often is a relevant clinical challenge. LGG in many instances are indeed slow growing tumors, which, if not controlled, can cause severe morbidity and ultimately jeopardize life. Most of the time children bearing an unresectable LGG can be considered affected by a chronic disease, deserving protracted cures. The treatment philosophy, which has dictated the treatment of malignant cancers, has also inspired the therapeutic concepts for managing childhood LGG. However, it is getting more and more evident that different strategies are needed for them. LGG represent a highly heterogeneous group of neoplasm and comprehensive treatment concepts rarely meet the individual patient's needs. After more than 20 years of clinical research it can be stated with confidence that for unresectable, progressive LGG, chemotherapy (CT) represents an effective treatment modality. It delays tumor growth and postpones the use of radiotherapy (RT), thus sparing the deleterious effects of irradiation on a developing brain. However, CT rarely cures LGG and definitively obviates the need of RT or aggressive surgery. Furthermore, little is known on the actual impact of CT on patients' overall health status. Recent progresses in RT delivering techniques, which allow reducing the safety margins, are tempering the concerns related to the use of this treatment modality in children. This manuscript reviews and expands these data, trying to combine them in a coherent picture that it is hoped can help in directing future research in this field.

Current treatment of leptomeningeal metastases: systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy and symptom management

Treatment of leptomeningeal metastases is multifaceted and includes symptomatic therapy, intrathecal and systemic chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. As the majority of patients have widespread incurable systemic tumor, treatment is predominantly palliative; however, some patients with leukemia, lymphoma or breast cancer may have prolonged remissions and the possibility of cure.

Open-label simultaneous radio-chemotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme with topotecan in adults

BACKGROUND

Due to its radioresistance, the prognosis of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains poor. Therefore, we investigated the impact of simultaneous radio-chemotherapy with topotecan (Hycamtin) on clinical outcome, tolerability and quality of life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter trial, 60 patients (19 females, 41 males) with histologically proven (5x biopsy, 31x subtotal resection, 24x total resection) GBM were included. Radio-Chemotherapy was performed with daily doses of 2.0 Gy (total, 60 Gy), and 0.5 mg (absolute dose) of topotecan intravenously 1 h prior to irradiation. Toxicity was assessed using common toxicity criteria (CTC). General condition and quality of life were assessed at baseline, at the end of therapy, and 6 weeks post-therapy. Local control and length of survival were compared with an historical control group of 67 patients only treated with postoperative radiotherapy following stereotactic biopsy (15x), subtotal resection (39x), or total resection (13x).

RESULTS

57 patients completed the therapy. Median radiation dose was 60 Gy (range 16-76 Gy). Median cumulative topotecan dose was 15 mg (range 7.5-18.5 mg). CTC toxicity grade 3 was observed in six patients and grade 4 toxicity in two patients (three events). Two patients died of septic disease. Mean Karnofsky index was 87% at baseline, 81% at the end of therapy, and 80% at 6 weeks post-therapy. Median survival time was 15 months, significantly longer than the 11 months seen in the control group (P < 0.002). Extent of tumour resection or patient age did not have a significant effect on survival.

CONCLUSION

This multimodal approach is well tolerated, and quality of life remains preserved. The relatively long median survival time is promising but a further randomised double blind placebo controlled parallel designed clinical trial should be performed to confirm these results.

Response to paclitaxel, topotecan, and topotecan-cyclophosphamide in children with untreated disseminated neuroblastoma treated in an upfront phase II investigational window: a pediatric oncology group study

PURPOSE

Most children older than 1 year of age with metastatic neuroblastoma (NB) die despite intensive chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. The Pediatric Oncology Group conducted a study of paclitaxel, topotecan, and topotecan-cyclophosphamide (topo-cyclo) in newly diagnosed children with stage IV NB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

There were 102 patients enrolled between September 1993 and October 1995; two of them were later shown to be ineligible. Of the remaining 100 patients, the first cohort of 33 patients received paclitaxel 350 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) over 24 hours every 14 to 21 days; the next 33 patients received topotecan 2 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days IV every 21 days; a third cohort of 34 patients were treated with IV cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m(2) followed by topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) each day for 5 days every 21 days. Patients were re-evaluated after two courses and then treated with intensive induction therapy and bone marrow transplantation.

RESULTS

Objective responses (complete response + partial response + mixed response) were documented in 67% of children who received topotecan, 76% after topo-cyclo, and 25% after paclitaxel. Four patients had grade 3 to 4 allergic reactions to paclitaxel; most patients developed grade 3 to 4 marrow suppression after topotecan or topo-cyclo. Neither disease-free survival nor overall survival differed significantly between children who received a phase II agent and those who did not. The 6-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates for all 100 children were 18% +/- 5% and 26% +/- 5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Topotecan and topo-cyclo are active in children with NB, are well tolerated, and should be evaluated further in combination regimens.

Oral topotecan in children with recurrent or progressive high-grade glioma: a Phase I/II study by the German Society for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology

BACKGROUND

Continuous oral treatment with topotecan may be more effective than the typical 1-day and 5-day treatment schedules. In previous studies of continuous treatment with topotecan, increased intestinal side effects were reported in adult patients; however, the experience in pediatric patients and patients with high-grade glioma is quite limited.

METHODS

Thirty-two pediatric patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (16 females and 16 males; median age, 9.5 years) were enrolled in the current Phase I/II study. Tumor locations included the cerebral cortex (n = 5), pons (n = 18), and other sites (n = 9). An injectable formulation of topotecan was administered orally, in ice-cold orange juice, once daily. The starting dose of 0.4 mg/m(2) per day was escalated on a patient-by-patient basis. At each patient's maximum dose, blood samples were obtained for the determination of plasma hydroxytopotecan and topotecan lactone concentrations and for the calculation of pharmacokinetic quantities.

RESULTS

The toxicity criteria for a maximum tolerated topotecan dose were met in only 19 patients. The primary toxicity type was hematologic. The median maximum tolerated dose was 0.9 mg/m(2) per day (n = 19). The calculated maximum total plasma topotecan concentration was 3.8 ng/mL (n = 7), with an area under the concentration-time curve of 38.4 ng. hours/mL and a half-life of 4.1 hours, which would result in the complete disappearance of topotecan from the plasma after 12 hours. Objective responses were observed in 2 of 13 evaluable patients and lasted for 2.5 and 9 months, respectively (continuous clinical remission, 1 of 14 patients; partial response, 2 of 14 patients; stable disease, 7 of 14 patients; progressive disease, 4 of 14 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral topotecan (median dose, 0.9 mg/m(2) per day) administered once daily was well tolerated and somewhat effective in children with recurrent high-grade glioma. A schedule in which the daily dose is split so that dosing is performed twice daily may be superior to the current schedule.

Phase I study of topotecan in combination with concurrent radiotherapy in adults with glioblastoma

A phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose of continuous intravenous infusion of topotecan in combination with radiotherapy (RT) in patients with previously untreated glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Twenty patients with histologically proven GBM and 1 with rhabdoid tumor were enrolled. After surgery or stereotactic biopsy, patients received cranial RT (60 Gy/30 fractions/40 days) and 3 cycles of topotecan as continuous infusion (CIV) from day 1 to 5 on weeks 1, 3, and 5 during RT. The dose of topotecan was escalated from 0.6 to 1.0 mg/m2/day. Four dose levels were tested. One grade 4 thrombocytopenia was seen at level 1 (topotecan dose 0.6 mg/m2/day; 6 patients). No dose-limiting toxicity was seen at level 2 (0.8 mg/m2/day; 3 patients) or an intermediate level of 2 bis (0.9 mg/m2/day; 6 patients). Six patients were included at level 3 (1.0 mg/m2/day), 4 of whom experienced dose-limiting toxicities, including 3 episodes of grade 4 thrombocytopenia, 1 platelet transfusion, 1 febrile neutropenia, and 1 grade 4 neutropenia of more than 7 days. Eighty percent of patients with GBM were alive at 12 months. The dose-limiting toxicity of topotecan administered as CIV for 5 days every 2 weeks is hematological. The maximum tolerated dose is 1.0 mg/m2/day and the recommended dose is 0.9 mg/m2/day. A phase II trial using the recommended dose of topotecan is ongoing.

Childhood ependymoma: a systematic review of treatment options and strategies

Childhood intracranial ependymoma have a dismal prognosis, especially in young children and when a gross total resection cannot be performed. Even in the absence of a radiologically proven residuum, around two-thirds of these young children will have a recurrence. Adjuvant therapy is therefore necessary for most, if not all, patients. Despite some indication that benign ependymoma (WHO grade II) could show a better outcome, histology cannot be used at present to stratify treatment protocols.Craniospinal irradiation combined with posterior fossa boost has deleterious adverse effects on cognition. Consequently, pediatric oncology teams have, firstly, tried to use chemotherapy to delay or avoid irradiation, and secondly, progressively reduced irradiation fields to the tumor bed without altering the prognosis. Cisplatin, at a dose of 120 mg/m(2) (cumulated response rate of 34% [95% CI 19-54%]) is the only single agent that has reproducibly shown some efficacy in ependymoma. Despite some combinations showing efficacy in the adjuvant setting, childhood intracranial ependymomas can, in general, be considered as chemoresistant. The overexpression of the multidrug resistance-1 gene and the 06-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase have been implicated as possible mechanisms for this phenomenon. As the use of chemotherapy with current agents is questionable, phase II studies with new agents and combinations are necessary. Since the main problem of this disease is local relapse, it may not be necessary to irradiate the whole posterior fossa. However, local control of the disease by irradiation has to be improved. In this respect, hyperfractionation or radiosensitizers may be valuable therapeutic options. The treatment of children with ependymoma is a challenge for all caregivers. There is no doubt that any possible improvement in the management of this rare tumor will only be the result of well designed cooperative trials.

Systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, and symptom management in the treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis

Metastasis to the leptomeninges occurs in many common cancers, including leukemia; lung, breast, and gastrointestinal cancers; and tumors of the brain. By way of the flow of cerebrospinal fluid, leptomeningeal metastasis spreads throughout the neuraxis. Consequently, therapy for leptomeningeal metastasis must be directed to the entire central nervous system (CNS). Treatment often consists of involved-field radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and intrathecal chemotherapy. However, because meningeal spread occurs most often in advanced disease, treatment is mainly palliative, except in childhood leukemia, where durable remission has been reported. This article outlines the role of systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Strategies for symptom management in these patients are also described.

The development of camptothecin analogs in childhood cancers

Camptothecin analogs, agents that target the intranuclear enzyme topoisomerase I, represent a promising new class of anticancer drugs for the treatment of childhood cancer. In preclinical studies, camptothecins, such as topotecan and irinotecan, are highly active against a variety of pediatric malignancies including neuroblastomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, gliomas, and medulloblastomas. In this paper, we review the status of completed and ongoing clinical trials and pharmacokinetic studies of camptothecin analogs in children. These and future planned studies of this novel class of cytotoxic agents are critical to defining the ultimate role of topoisomerase I poisons in the treatment of childhood cancer.

Pharmacotherapy of malignant astrocytomas of children and adults: current strategies and future trends

This article reviews the conceptual progression in the pharmacological therapy of malignant astrocytoma (MA) over the past decade, and its future trends. It is a selective rather than an exhaustive inventory of literature citations. The experience of the Brain Tumour Cooperative Group (BTCG) and earlier phase III trials are summarised to place subsequent phase II and I studies of single and combination agent chemotherapy in perspective. The BTCG experience of the 1970s to 1980s may be summarised to indicate that external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is therapeutic, although not curative, and not further improved upon by altering fractionation schedules, or the addition of radioenhancers. Whole brain and reduced whole brain EBRT with focal boost were comparable regimens. Nitrosourea-based, adjuvant chemotherapy provided a modest improvement in survival among adult patients, which was comparable with that of other single drugs or multidrug regimes. The multiagent schedules, however, had a correspondingly higher toxicity rate. Intra-arterial administration was associated with significant risk, which conferred no therapeutic advantage. The trend of the past decade has been towards multiagent chemotherapy although its benefit cannot be predicted from the classic prognostic factors. Published experience with investigational trials utilising myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell haemopoietic support, drug delivery enhancement methods and radiosensitisers is critically reviewed. None of these approaches have achieved wide-spread acceptance in the treatment of adult patients with MA. Greater attention is placed on recent 'chemoradiotherapy' trials, which attempt to integrate and maximise the cytoreductive potential of both modalities. This approach holds promise as an effective means to delay or overcome the evolution of tumour resistance, which is probably one of the dominant determinants of prognosis. However, the efficacy of this approach remains unproven. New chemotherapeutic agents as well as biological response modifiers, protein kinase inhibitors, angiogenesis inhibitors and gene therapy are also discussed; their role in the therapeutic armamentarium has not been defined.

Successful therapy of subcutaneously growing human hepatoblastoma xenografts with topotecan

BACKGROUND

Human hepatoblastoma is an infrequent liver tumor in children. Although many hepatoblastomas can be treated adequately with well-defined treatment regimens, problems still persist with advanced and non-resectable tumors; in these cases, an effective chemotherapy is necessary to improve the patients' prognosis. This underlines the need for alternative anti-tumor agents in the treatment of human hepatoblastoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effects of topotecan, a water-soluble camptothecin analog (topoisomerase-I-antagonist), in an in vivo model of three human hepatoblastomas xenografted subcutaneously into nude mice.

PROCEDURE

Hepatoblastoma cell suspensions from three children were transplanted subcutaneously into nude mice NMRI (nu/nu). Treatment with topotecan was initiated when the tumors reached a volume between 50 and 80 mm(3). A dose of 6.6 mg/kg of topotecan were given intraperitoneally every 4 days on four occasions. The tumor volume development and alpha-fetoprotein alterations were measured and statistically analyzed. After the treatment, the tumors were investigated histologically and by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction of tumor growth in all treated tumor xenografts vs. untreated control groups (mean relative volume 3.1 vs. 47.4; P = 0,0015-0,0079). Serum alpha-fetoprotein levels were reduced in all three cell lines, in two of them significantly (mean 44,535 kU/l vs. 228,883 kU/l; P = 0.005-0.246). Histologically, the tumor necrosis rates were higher and immunohistochemistry showed lower proliferation activities in the treated tumor xenografts vs. the control groups.

CONCLUSION

The data show that topotecan is an effective agent in the treatment of human hepatoblastoma xenografts. From these results, treatment with topotecan appears to be a promising alternative in the pre- and postoperative therapy of patients suffering from human hepatoblastoma

What have we learnt from previous phase II trials to help in the management of childhood brain tumours?

Contrary to major advances in cure rates observed for almost all childhood cancers, progress in reducing brain tumour survival rates remains very limited. Although new drug development in oncology is founded on principles outlined in the organised methodology of phase I, II, and III trials, based on rigorous study design using standardised criteria, this approach has been applied very slowly in the field of neuro-oncology. There are multiple explanations for the paucity of well-conducted prospective clinical trials, such as the rarity and the heterogeneity of these tumours, and the reluctance of some investigators to enroll their patients in constraining trials. Data from the past two decades shows that several methodological problems preclude the drawing of any definite conclusions for the majority of drugs assessed. Among them, the necessity of a central neuropathological and neuroradiological review has been highlighted in, at least, two multicentric studies. Changes in histological diagnosis and grade have been reported in a proportion as high as 20%, and changes in response rate in 14% of the cases. This review of phase II trials for brain tumours reveals a wide array of sometimes arbitrary response definitions, that is if response is defined at all, and most series have enrolled small numbers of patients. We report on the different problems encountered in childhood brain tumours in these phase II trials, and their impact on phase III trials.

Topotecan versus observation after cisplatin plus etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: E7593--a phase III trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of topotecan in combination with standard chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a phase III trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had measurable or assessable disease and an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2; stable brain metastases were allowed. All patients received four cycles of cisplatin and etoposide every 3 weeks (step 1; PE). Patients with stable or responding disease were then randomized to observation or four cycles of topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days, every 3 weeks; step 2). A total of 402 eligible patients were registered to step 1, and 223 eligible patients were registered to step 2 (observation, n = 111; topotecan, n = 112).

RESULTS

Complete and partial response rates to induction PE were 3% and 32%, respectively. A 7% response rate was observed with topotecan (complete response, 2%; partial response, 5%). The median survival time for all 402 eligible patients was 9.6 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) from date of randomization on step 2 was significantly better with topotecan compared with observation (3.6 months v 2.3 months; P <.001). However, overall survival from date of randomization on step 2 was not significantly different between the observation and topotecan arms (8.9 months v 9.3 months; P =.43). Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 50% and 3%, respectively, of PE patients in step 1 and 60% and 13% of topotecan patients in step 2. Grade 4/5 infection was observed in 4.6% of PE patients and 1.8% of topotecan patients. Grade 3/4 anemia developed in 22% of patients who received topotecan. No difference in quality of life between topotecan and observation was observed at any assessment time or for any of the subscale scores.

CONCLUSION

Four cycles of PE induction therapy followed by four cycles of topotecan improved PFS but failed to improve overall survival or quality of life in extensive-stage SCLC. Four cycles of standard PE remains an appropriate first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC patients with good performance status.

A North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II trial of topotecan in relapsed gliomas

Current systemic treatment options for patients with relapsed gliomas are limited. The topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan has demonstrated broad antitumor activity in both preclinical studies as well as a number of phase I and II trials in humans. Studies in primates have shown good cerebrospinal fluid levels of topotecan following systemic administration. We therefore performed this phase II trial in patients who developed evidence of progressive glioma after definitive radiation therapy. Patients were treated with 1.5 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 consecutive days repeated every three weeks. For patients who had received prior nitrosourea-containing chemotherapy, the starting dose was 1.25 mg/m2. Thirty-three patients were entered on this study. All patients were eligible and evaluable for both response and toxicity. Seven patients experienced grade 4 leukopenia with 2 of these patients dying of infection-related complications. Six of these seven patients were not taking anticonvulsants during treatment. Nine patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, seven of whom were not taking anticonvulsants. Nonhematologic side effects were infrequent and manageable. One patient experienced a partial response to this treatment for an overall response rate of 3% (95% binomial confidence interval 0.3%-20.4%). The median time to progression was 14.9 weeks and median survival 19.9 weeks. Topotecan at this dose and schedule showed no substantial activity in relapsed gliomas.

Radiotherapy followed by high dose busulfan and thiotepa: a prospective assessment of high dose chemotherapy in children with diffuse pontine gliomas

BACKGROUND

The role of high dose chemotherapy (HDC) in patients with pediatric brain tumors currently is ill-defined. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and the benefit of HDC after radiotherapy in a group of children with newly diagnosed diffuse pontine gliomas.

METHODS

Patients eligible for study were ages 3-18 years with diffuse intrinsic tumors arising in the pons, who were not treated previously with radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Histologic confirmation was not mandatory, provided clinical findings and magnetic resonance imaging were typical. Patients were given focal radiotherapy followed 2-3 months later by HDC. Busulfan (150 mg/m(2) on Days 8, 7, 6, and 5) and thiotepa (300 mg/m(2) on Days 4, 3, and 2) were administered prior to autologous bone marrow transplantation. Survival was the endpoint, and the statistical procedure was based on sequential subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were entered on to the study, 12 of whom underwent stereotactic biopsy or open surgery at the time of diagnosis. One patient eventually was excluded due to inappropriate eligibility criteria. All 35 eligible patients received irradiation. Early progression (9 patients) and parental refusal (2 patients) precluded the use of HDC in 11 patients. Three patients died of HDC-related complications. All 21 patients who survived HDC eventually died of disease progression. The median survival time was 10 months for the study group. The median survival time in the subgroup of patients who received HDC was 10 months (range, 3-26 months). Statistical analysis did not suggest any evidence of survival benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with diffuse pontine gliomas, survival using this aggressive treatment modality does not appear to be any better than that reported for conventional radiotherapy.

Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and pharmacotherapy of patients with primary brain tumors

OBJECTIVE

To briefly review the clinical presentation and diagnosis of patients with primary brain tumors, followed by an in-depth survey of the pertinent pharmacotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

A detailed search of the neurologic, neurosurgical, and oncologic literature for basic science research, clinical studies, and review articles related to chemotherapy and pharmacotherapy of primary brain tumors.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant studies on tissue culture systems, animals, and humans examining the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical pharmacology, and treatment results of chemotherapeutic agents for primary brain tumors. In addition, studies of pharmacologic agents administered for supportive care and symptom control are reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Primary brain tumors derive from cells within the intracranial cavity and generally present with headache, seizure activity, cognitive changes, and weakness. They are diagnosed most efficiently with magnetic resonance imaging. After diagnosis, the most common supportive medications include corticosteroids, gastric acid inhibitors, and anticonvulsants. Chemotherapy is adjunctive treatment for patients with malignant tumors and selected recurrent or progressive benign neoplasms. In general, the most effective chemotherapeutic drugs are alkylating agents such as the nitrosoureas, procarbazine, cisplatin, and carboplatin. Other agents used include cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, vincristine, and etoposide. Angiogenesis inhibitors and gene therapy comprise some of the novel therapeutic strategies under investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of chemotherapy for primary brain tumors remains modest. Novel agents must be discovered that are more specific and attack tumor cells at the molecular level of tumorigenesis. Furthermore, strategies must be developed to counteract the pervasive problem of brain tumor chemoresistance.

Topotecan for the treatment of recurrent or progressive central nervous system tumors - a pediatric oncology group phase II study

Topotecan was studied as a 72 h infusion given every 3 weeks. Treatment began at a dose of 1.0 mg/m2/day and was increased to 1.25 mg/m2/day after the first 6 patients tolerated this higher dose without excessive toxicities. Eighty-eight evaluable children were accrued in 6 strata. There were no complete nor partial responses. Twenty subjects had stable disease (astrocytoma 5/11, malignant glioma 5/13, medulloblastoma 0/12, brain stem tumor 4/19, ependymoma 5/17, and miscellaneous histologies 1/16). Two patients (astrocytoma, ependymoma) completed the maximum 18 topotecan courses. The remaining 68 children developed progressive disease within 2 months. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity. Grade 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 18, 32, 5, and 23 participants, respectively. It was concluded that topotecan as given according to this schedule showed insufficient activity to promote it to frontline protocol usage.

The accumulation of topotecan in 9L glioma and in brain parenchyma with and without dexamethasone administration

The accumulation of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan in brain tumor as well as in brain around tumor (BAT) and normal brain following an intravenous bolus of topotecan of 0.5 mg/kg was investigated in rats bearing a 9L glioma. Also the influence of dexamethasone (Dex) on the uptake of topotecan was examined. Tumor, BAT and brain tissue as well as whole blood were collected at 1 h after an i.v. bolus of topotecan. Concentrations of total topotecan in tumor, BAT and brain were quantified with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and compared with concentrations in plasma of total topotecan. In brain tumor tissue the mean total topotecan concentration was 96 +/- 33 ng/g which was 20-fold higher than the accumulation of topotecan in normal brain tissue. In BAT intermediate concentrations of 13 +/- 4.9 ng/g were reached. Mean total topotecan concentration in plasma was 100 +/- 25 ng/ml. We did not find an influence of Dex on the uptake of topotecan in either tissue. We conclude that high tissue concentrations of topotecan can be reached in experimental brain tumors in rats. This observation may be useful in the design of clinical studies with topotecan.

Synergistic cytotoxicity, apoptosis and protein-linked DNA breakage by etoposide and camptothecin in human U87 glioma cells: dependence on tyrosine phosphorylation

In this study, simultaneous administration of certain inhibitors of topoisomerase I and topoisomerase II produced synergistic cytotoxicity in a series of human glioma cell lines. Camptothecin (CPT) and etoposide (VP-16) produced combination indices (CI) <1.0 in all glioma cell lines tested, including those that were relatively resistant to the two topoisomerase inhibitors individually. In contrast, CPT and VP-16 produced additive cytotoxicity in HT-29 and SW-620 colon carcinoma cell lines. To explore the molecular basis for synergy in glioma cells, we focused on one glioma cell line (U87) in which even sub-cytotoxic doses of CPT potentiated the action of VP-16. Except for genistein (a topo II agent with tyrosine kinase inhibitory function), all topo II inhibitors tested (doxorubicin, ellipticine, and m-AMSA) were synergistic with CPT. While CPT and VP-16 produced cytotoxicity and protein-linked DNA breaks (PLDB) that were supra-additive in U87 glioma cells, CPT and genistein produced additive results. Pretreatment of U87 cells with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor tyrphostin-A23 or the tyrosine phosphatase activator O-phospho-L-tyrosine (OPLT) reduced combination PLDB from synergistic to additive levels, but had no effect on the formation of PLDB induced by either CPT or VP-16 alone. CPT and VP-16 also produced a synergistic accumulation of sub-G0 (apoptotic) cells which was blocked by tyrphostin-A23. No significant increase in topoisomerase protein levels could be detected in response to combination treatment. Thus, synergistic effects between topoisomerase I and topoisomerase II inhibitors in U87 glioma cells may depend upon phosphorylation of cellular proteins other than the topoisomerases themselves.

Topotecan: a new topoisomerase I inhibiting antineoplastic agent

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, therapeutic, and safety aspects of topotecan, a new antineoplastic agent, and to assess its role in the treatment of cancer.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE database English language only, January 1990-March 1998; SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals; published articles, books, and abstracts.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies in humans with cancer, clinical case reports, open clinical trials, and controlled clinical studies. Efficacy studies were limited primarily to trials with at least 20 evaluable patients:

DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant data were extracted only from published reports. Data were obtained from studies in both articles and abstracts. Only articles written in English were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Topotecan is an effective second- or third-line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer and is comparable to ifosfamide, liposomal doxorubicin, and paclitaxel. Activity in combination with other agents and as a first-line agent is yet to be determined. Limited data indicate activity in small-cell lung cancer, cancers of the breast and uterus, and in nonlymphocytic leukemia. The dose-limiting toxicity is myelosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Topotecan is an effective second-line agent for patients with unresponsive or relapsed cancer of the ovary. It appears to be similar to other active agents in patients with this disease status. Its ultimate role in ovarian cancer and other neoplasms awaits additional evaluation in combination with other agents and as first-line therapy.

Preclinical development of camptothecin derivatives and clinical trials in pediatric oncology

Although the prognosis of childhood cancers has dramatically improved over the last three decades, new active drugs are needed. Camptothecins represent a very attractive new class of anticancer drugs to develop in paediatric oncology. The preclinical and clinical development of two of these DNA-topoisomerase I inhibitors, i.e. topotecan and irinotecan, is ongoing in paediatric malignancies. Here we review the currently available results of this evaluation. Topotecan proved to be active against several paediatric tumour xenografts. In paediatric phase I studies exploring several administration schedules, myelosuppression was dose-limiting. The preliminary results of topotecan evaluation in phase II study showed antitumour activity in neuroblastoma (response rate: 15% at relapse and 37% in newly diagnosed patients with disseminated disease) and in metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (40% in untreated patients). Topotecan-containing drug combinations are currently investigated. Irinotecan displayed a broad spectrum of activity in paediatric solid tumour xenografts, including rhabdo-myosarcoma, neuroblastoma, peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, malignant glioma and juvenile colon cancer. For several of these histology types, tumour-free survivors have been observed among animals bearing an advanced-stage tumour at time of treatment. The clinical evaluation of irinotecan in children is ongoing. Irinotecan undergoes a complex in vivo biotransformation involving several enzyme systems, such as carboxylesterase, UDPGT and cytochrome P450, in children as well as in adults. Preclinical studies of both drugs have shown that their activity was schedule-dependent. The optimal schedule of administration is an issue that needs to be addressed in children. In conclusion, the preliminary results of the paediatric evaluation of camptothecin derivatives show very encouraging results in childhood malignancies. The potential place of camptothecins in the treatment of paediatric malignant tumours is discussed.

Topoisomerase I inhibitors: review and update

This review presents a summary of preclinical and clinical data on the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitors that are under clinical development. To date, all of the topo I inhibitors that have been clinically evaluated are analogues of camptothecin, an extract of the Chinese tree Camptotheca acuminata. The therapeutic development of camptothecin was initially limited by its poor solubility and unpredictable toxicity. More recently, a number of water-soluble camptothecin analogues have undergone extensive evaluation and have demonstrated significant clinical activity. These include irinotecan (CPT-II), topotecan, and 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC). Preliminary data are also reviewed on other camptothecin analogues (GG-211 and DX-8951f), on oral formulations, and on non-camptothecin topoisomerase I inhibitors. The topoisomerase I inhibitors have already demonstrated a broad spectrum of antitumour activity, most probably due to their unique mechanism of action and lack of clinical cross-resistance with existing antineoplastic compounds. The challenge for the next five years is to identify ways to integrate the topo I inhibitors into multidrug and multimodality therapies to achieve optimal antitumour effect, while keeping the side effects of these therapies manageable.