Analysis of the early postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen time-course as a prognostic tool for bronchogenic carcinoma

Disappearance Curves for Tumor Markers after Resection of Intrathoracic Malignancies

Determination of the standard elimination kinetics of tumor markers will be helpful in the diagnosis of malignancies. We analyzed the disappearance curves for serum tumor marker levels after resection of intrathoracic malignancies. Serum levels of CEA, SLX, AFP, CA 19-9, SCC, TPA and CYFRA were measured several times after surgery in a total of 40 patients. To obtain precise biological half-lives, we applied non-linear least square analysis, taking into consideration the possibility of residual tumor cells. Disappearance curves were monophasic for CEA, SCC, TPA, CYFRA and SLX and biphasic for CA 19-9 and AFP. Temporary elevation of serum levels after surgery was observed for SCC, TPA and CYFRA. The average half-lives of CEA, SLX, SCC, TPA and CYFRA were 1.5 days, 2.7 days, 2.2 hours, 2.5 hours and 1.5 hours, respectively. The average half-life of CA 19-9 was 0.5 days in the first compartment and 4.3 days in the second compartment, while that of AFP was 1.0 days and 6.3 days, respectively. These values will be helpful in the interpretation of serum tumor marker levels after surgery.

The Combination of the Tumor Markers Suggests the Histological Diagnosis of Lung Cancer

Tumor markers are beneficial for the diagnosis and therapy monitoring of lung cancer. However, the value of tumor markers in lung cancer histological diagnosis is unknown. In this study, we analyzed the serum levels of six tumor markers (CEA, CYFRA21-1, SCC, NSE, ProGRP, and CA125) in 2097 suspected patients with lung cancer and determined whether the combination of the tumor markers was useful for histological diagnosis of lung cancer. We found that CYFRA21-1 was the most sensitive marker in NSCLC. ProGRP showed a better clinical performance than that of NSE in discriminating between SCLC and NSCLC. The serum level of CYFRA21-1 or SCC was significantly higher in squamous carcinoma (p < 0.05), and the levels of ProGRP and NSE were significantly higher in SCLC (p < 0.05). According to the criteria established, SCLC and NSCLC were discriminated with sensitivity of 87.12 and 62.63% and specificity of 64.61 and 99.5%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation of adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma were 68.1 and 81.63% and 70.73 and 65.93%, with NPV of 46.03 and 68.97% and PPV of 85.82 and 79.47%, respectively. Our results suggested the combination of six tumor markers could discriminate the histological types of lung cancer.

Development and cross-validation of prognostic models to assess the treatment effect of cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma patients

Better understanding of the treatment effect of cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy on lung adenocarcinoma patients is needed to facilitate chemotherapy planning and patient care. In this retrospective study, we will develop prognostic models by the cross-validation method using clinical and serum factors to predict outcomes of cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Lung adenocarcinoma patients admitted between 2008 and 2013 were enrolled. 29 serum parameters of laboratory tests and 14 clinical factors were analyzed to develop the prognostic models. First, the stepwise selection and five-fold cross-validation were performed to identify candidate prognostic factors. Then a classification of all patients based on the number of metastatic sites resulted in four distinct subsets. In each subset, a prognostic model was fitted with the most accurate prognostic factors from the candidate prognostic factors. Categorical survival prediction was estimated using a log-rank test and visualized with Kaplan-Meier method. 227 lung adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled. Twenty candidate prognostic factors evaluated using the five-fold cross-validation method were total protein, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, creatine kinase, age, smoking index, neuron-specific enolase, bone metastasis, total triglyceride, albumin, gender, uric acid, CYFRA21-1, lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis, lactate dehydrogenase, CA153, peritoneal metastasis, CA125, and CA199. From these 20 candidate prognostic factors, the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model with the highest prognostic accuracy in each subset was identified by the stepwise forward selection method, which generated significant prognostic stratifications in Kaplan-Meier survival analyses (all log-rank p < 0.01). Generally, the prognostic models using five-fold cross-validation achieve a good prediction performance. The prognostic models can be administered safely to lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with first-line cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy, and a comprehensive assessment of clinical and serum factors helps predict the outcomes of cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy.

Prognostic value of serum leptin in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy

Cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy has been established as a standard treatment in lung adenocarcinoma. However, the response to the cisplatin/pemetrexed combination varies considerably among patients due to individual variations. Thus, novel biomarkers are required to aid the prediction of the response to the cisplatin/pemetrexed combination. We hypothesized that leptin expression may be a determinant for prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma patients with cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy. Serum from consenting patients with lung adenocarcinoma were obtained for the measurement of leptin and associated tumor biomarkers. Leptin expression was measured by radioimmunoassay. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), CA15-3, CA125, CA72-4, cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) expression were determined by electrochemiluminescence immunoassays. Serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels were measured using a microparticle enzyme immunoassay. The associations between serum leptin and tumor biomarker expression were evaluated by Spearman's correlation analysis. Serum CEA, CA19-9, CA15-3, CA125, CA72-4, CYFRA21-1 and NSE levels showed no obvious difference among patients. However, a trend towards an improved prognosis was observed in patients with lower serum leptin at diagnosis and an increase during cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy. The results indicated that the serum leptin level has prognostic indications in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma during cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy, which indicates that it may be a useful marker for the prognosis of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment.

[Stage IIIA and IIIB non-small cell lung cancer: results of chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy and analysis of prognostic factors]

OBJECTIVE

Most patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not candidates for surgery but can benefit from chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy. The objective of the present study was to analyze the results of sequential chemotherapy and radiation therapy and the prognostic value of initial clinical and laboratory variables.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study of 92 patients with stage III NSCLC treated with a sequential regimen of chemotherapy (carboplatin-etoposide, carboplatin-gemcitabine, and carboplatin-paclitaxel), and radiation therapy (6000 cGy in daily doses of 200 cGy, 5 d/wk). Response to therapy, overall survival, and the prognostic value of epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory variables were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Median survival time was 14 months, with a 3-year survival rate of 16.1%. Poor performance status (score of 2 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncologic Group [ECOG] scale), anemia, and elevated serum concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen were predictive of poorer survival in the multivariate analysis. In the univariate analysis, weight loss and diagnosis before the year 2000 were also associated with poorer prognosis (P<.01). TNM stage was not significantly correlated (P=.08). Toxicity was low, with 1 death and few cases of grade 3 or 4 toxicity according to World Health Organization criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy should be considered contraindicated in cases of poor performance status (ECOG scale score of 2). Weight loss, an elevated serum concentration of carcinoembryonic antigen, and a hemoglobin concentration of 12 g/dL or less carry a poor prognosis.

Lung Cancer - Clinical Implications

Karcinom pluća je najčešće maligno oboljenje kod muškog pola, a u žena na drugom mestu (nakon raka dojke). Klinička podela na nemikrocelularni (NSCLC) i mikrocelularni (SCLC) odražava različito biološko ponašanje i sledstveno razlike u terapijskom pristupu. Od velike važnosti bi bilo postojanje biomarkera koji bi omogućili razlikovanje ova dva tipa karcinoma pluća, naročito u slučajeva kada nije izvodljiva invazivna dijagnostika kao i u praćenju efekata terapije i ranom otkrivanju relapsa bolesti. Rezultati velikih retrospektivnih ili prospektivnih studija ukazuju na izvesnu vrednost specifičnih markera ili kombinacija ovih markera za dijagnostičke i diferencijalno dijagnostičke svrhe. Merenje četiri serum tumor markera, CYFRA 21-1, CEA, NSE i ProGRP ima opravdanja da bi se identifikovao vodeći marker i na taj način predpostavio verovatni histološki tip tumora. Serijska određivanja odgovarajućeg tumor markera može takođe biti od pomoći da se utvrdi kompletnost uklanjanja tumora i utvrdi relaps bolesti u okultnom kliničkom stadijumu.

A case of serum CEA disappearance curve after resection of breast carcinoma

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) elimination kinetics after tumor resection were measured in a case of breast cancer. A 45-year-old woman with a left breast carcinoma underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The serum CEA level before surgery was 34.3 ng/ml. After sequential monitoring of serum CEA levels, postoperative serum CEA elimination kinetics were calculated using non-linear least square analysis with the fitting equation C(t)=(C0-Cp)exp(-kt)+Cp, where C(t) was the postoperative CEA level, t was the number days after surgery, C0 was the CEA level at postoperative time zero, Cp was the CEA at plateau, and k was the rate constant of elimination. Cp was calculated as 6.9 ng/ml, which was above the cut-off level and indicated residual malignancy. After adjuvant chemotherapy, CEA normalized to 1.8 ng/ml. In breast cancer patients with high preoperative serum CEA levels, our analytical method for CEA elimination might be useful for the detection of residual malignancies.

Time course of carcinoembryonic antigen after resection of lung cancer: a predictor of recurrence

We investigated whether the early postoperative time course of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level after resection of lung cancer could be used to predict patients' prognosis. Fifty-three lung cancer patients were included in this study. Postoperative serum CEA levels were calculated by means of non-linear least-squares fitting to the equation C(t) = (C(0)-C(p))exp(-kt) + C(p), where C(t) is postoperative CEA level, t is days after surgery, C(0) is CEA level at postoperative time 0, C(p) is CEA level at plateau, and k is the rate constant of elimination. Postoperative CEA production (P(p)) was calculated as C(p) multiplied by k. C(p) and P(p) represent the numbers of residual tumor cells after surgery. More residual tumor cells yield higher values of C(p) and P(p), and result in earlier recurrence.

RESULTS

Kinetic parameters could be obtained for 30 patients whose preoperative CEA levels were sufficiently elevated. Cutoff levels as predictors for recurrence were 1.1 ng/ml for C(p) and 0.9 ng/ml/day for P(p). The accuracy of prediction of recurrence using these cutoff levels was 79% with C(p) and 89% with P(p). A very poor prognosis was observed for patients with P(p) over 0.9 ng/ml/day.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of the time course of changes in CEA levels after resection of lung cancer appears to be useful for predicting patient prognosis. C(p) and P(p) are very precise predictors of recurrence.

Immunohistochemical analysis of resected clinical stage I pulmonary adenocarcinomas with high preoperative levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen

BACKGROUND

Clinical stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma (AD) patients with persistently high serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels after surgery have a poor prognosis. Although CEA staining pattern is reported to be a prognostic indicator for patients with colorectal cancer, the relationship with lung cancer is unclear.

METHODS

One hundred eighteen patients with clinical stage I AD underwent surgery from 1993 to 1997. Of them, 19 (16%) patients with a high preoperative serum level of CEA and 19 randomly selected control patients with preoperatively normal CEA were studied. CEA staining of tumor specimens from each of the 38 patients was performed, and the staining patterns were then classified into two types: apical and diffuse.

RESULTS

Patients with normal postoperative serum CEA levels (group HN, n = 13) had a 5-year survival rate higher than those with persistently high postoperative serum CEA (group HH, n = 6). In a comparison between the two groups, apical patterns (n = 10) were only seen in group HN, and those who demonstrated an apical CEA staining pattern had a 5-year survival rate (5-YSR) of 80% as compared with 13% for those HN patients with only a diffuse pattern (p = 0.01). In the control group, 16 (84%) patients had an apical staining pattern and the other 3 patients showed no staining.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with normalized serum CEA levels had a high chance of showing an apical staining pattern, which may be a very good prognosis predictor for patients with high preoperative levels of CEA.

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen level in surgically resected clinical stage I patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

There is little general agreement concerning the effectiveness of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a prognostic indicator for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical stage I patients. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the relationship between serum CEA level and survival.

METHODS

We assessed 297 consecutive patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent surgical resection at Toneyama National Hospital from 1985 to 1998. Serum CEA levels were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit with the upper limit of normal defined as 7.0 ng/mL based on the 95% specificity level for benign lung disease, in our hospital.

RESULTS

There were 56 (19%) patients with serum CEA greater than 7.0 ng/mL. The high CEA group had a median survival time of 50 months and a 5-year survival rate of 49% compared with a 5-year survival rate of 72% (p < 0.0001) for the normal CEA group (n = 241). Patients with postoperatively high CEA levels (n = 15) had the worse prognosis (median survival time 35 months, and 5-year survival 18%) compared with patients whose levels returned to normal (n = 41, median survival time 8.8 months, and 5-year survival 68%; p = 0.01). These differences were also observed in patients with pathologic stage I or II tumors but not in those with pathologic stage III or IV tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum CEA level is a useful predictor of survival for patients with clinical stage I NSCLC, and a persistently high CEA level after surgery is an especially strong indicator of a very poor prognosis.

A comparison of staging systems for localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Staging systems for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are important to identify patients with similar systemic risk who might benefit from specific treatments. This study compared four commonly used staging systems for predicting systemic outcomes of patients with localized extremity STS, as proposed by the fourth and fifth editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) staging system, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) system, and the Surgical Staging System (SSS) of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society.

METHODS

Three hundred consecutive adult patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic STS of the lower extremity were treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1982 and 1989. Metastasis free survival was the end point of the study. The prognostic value of the four staging systems and their components were examined in univariate and multivariate analyses. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to identify the system that best predicted the risk of systemic recurrence.

RESULTS

Compartment status, depth, grade, and size were all independent predictors of outcome within their respective staging systems. However, when compared with one another, only depth, grade, and size retained their prognostic significance. Of the four models, the AIC predicted that the MSK was the best predictor of systemic relapse, followed by the fifth edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system.

CONCLUSIONS

Staging systems such as the MSK system or the fifth edition of the AJCC/UICC system, which include tumor depth, grade, and size as prognostic factors, are the most predictive of systemic relapse in patients presenting with localized extremity STS. Both of these systems identify the same group of patients at the highest risk who would be the most suitable for adjuvant chemotherapy trials.