Is chemoradiation feasible in elderly patients?

Management of non-metastatic anal cancer in the elderly: ancillary study of the French multicenter prospective cohort FFCD-ANABASE

BACKGROUND

Standard care for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is chemoradiotherapy, data about elderly patients are scarce.

METHODS

All consecutive patients treated for non-metastatic SCCA from the French multicenter FFCD-ANABASE cohort were included. Two groups were defined according to age: elderly (≥75 years) and non-elderly (<75).

RESULTS

Of 1015 patients, 202 (19.9%) were included in the elderly group; median follow-up was 35.5 months. Among the elderly, there were more women (p = 0.015); frailer patients (p < 0.001), fewer smokers (p < 0.001) and fewer HIV-infected (p < 0.001) than in the non-elderly group. Concomitant chemotherapy and inguinal irradiation were less frequent (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04). In the elderly group; 3-year overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and colostomy-free survival (CFS) were 82.9%, 72.4% and 78.0%, respectively; complete response rate at 4-6 months was 70.3%. There were no differences between groups for all outcomes and toxicity. In multivariate analyses for the elderly, PS ≥ 2 and locally-advanced tumors were significantly associated with poor OS (HR = 3.4 and HR = 2.80), RFS (HR = 2.4 and HR = 3.1) and CFS (HR = 3.8 and HR = 3.0); and treatment interruption with poor RFS (HR = 1.9).

CONCLUSION

In the FFCD-ANABASE cohort, age did not influence tumor and tolerance outcomes of non-metastatic SCCA. Optimal curative treatment should be offered to elderly patients.

Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?

Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiation therapy in similar clinical scenarios compared to younger patients. However, there is no clear evidence for a generally reduced radiation tolerance with increasing age. Modern radiation techniques have clearly reduced acute and late side effects, thus extending the boundaries of the possible regarding treatment intensity in elderly or frail patients. Hypofractionated regimens have further decreased the socioeconomic burden of radiation treatments by reducing the overall treatment time. The current review aims at summarizing the existing data for the use of radiation therapy or chemoradiation in elderly patients focusing on the main cancer types. It provides an overview of treatment tolerability and outcomes with current standard radiation therapy regimens, including possible predictive factors in the elderly population. Strategies for patient selection for standard or tailored radiation therapy approaches based on age, performance score or comorbidity, including the use of prediction tests or geriatric assessments, are discussed. Current and future possibilities for improvements of routine care and creation of high-level evidence in elderly patients receiving radiation therapy are highlighted.

The association of age with acute toxicities in NRG oncology combined modality lower GI cancer trials

PURPOSE

Expected toxicity from chemoradiation (CRT) is an important factor in treatment decisions but is poorly understood in older adults with lower gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Our objective was to compare acute adverse events (AAEs) of older and younger adults with lower GI malignancies treated on NRG studies.

METHODS

Data from 6 NRG trials, testing combined modality therapy in patients with anal or rectal cancer, were used to test the hypothesis that older age was associated with increased AAEs. AAEs and compliance with protocol-directed therapy were compared between patients aged ≥70 and < 70. Categorical variables were compared across age groups using the chi-square test. The association of age on AAEs was evaluated using a covariate-adjusted logistic regression model, with odds ratio (OR) reported. To adjust for multiple comparisons, a p-value <0.01 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 2525 patients, including 380 patients ≥70 years old (15%) evaluable. Older patients were more likely to have worse baseline performance status (PS 1 or 2) (23% vs. 16%, p = 0.001), but otherwise baseline characteristics were similar. Older patients were less likely to complete their chemotherapy (78% vs. 87%, p < 0.001), but had similar RT duration. On univariate analysis, older patients were more likely to experience grade ≥ 3 GI AAEs (36% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), and less likely to experience grade ≥ 3 skin AAEs (8% vs. 14%, p = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, older age was associated with grade ≥ 3 GI AAE (OR 1.93, 95% CI: 1.52, 2.47, p < 0.001) after adjusting for sex, race, PS, and disease site.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients with lower GI cancers who underwent CRT were less likely to complete chemotherapy and had higher rates of grade 3+ GI AAEs. These results can be used to counsel older adults prior to treatment and manage expected toxicities throughout pelvic CRT.

Multimodal therapy is feasible in elderly anal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Many patients are diagnosed with an anal cancer in high ages. We here present the outcome after oncological therapy for patients above 80 years compared with younger patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A series of 213 consecutive patients was diagnosed and treated at a single institution from 1984 to 2009. The patients received similar radiation doses but with different techniques, thus progressively sparing more normal tissues. The majority of patients also had simultaneous [5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin C] or induction chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5FU). The patients were stratified by age above or below 80 years. Despite that the goal was to offer standard chemoradiation treatment to all, the octo- and nonagenarians could not always be given chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In our series 35 of 213 anal cancer patients were above 80 years. After initial therapy similar complete response was observed, 80% above and 87% below 80 years. Local recurrence rate was also similar in both groups, 21% versus 26% (p = .187). Cancer-specific survival and relative survival were significantly lower in patients above 80 years, 60% and 50% versus 83% and 80%, (p = .015 and p = .027), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients older than 80 years develop anal cancer, but more often marginal tumors. Even in the oldest age group half of the patients can tolerate standard treatment by a combination of radiation and chemotherapy, and obtain a relative survival of 50% after five years. Fragile patients not considered candidates for chemoradiation may be offered radiation or resection to control local disease.

Impact of advancing age on treatment and outcomes in anal cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) may cause significant toxicity, and concerns exist about its tolerability in the elderly. The authors compared tolerability and outcomes across the age groups following CRT for SCCA.

METHODS

Single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with localized SCCA treated with CRT. CRT was standardized at 50.4-54 Gy, with concurrent infusional 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Patients were arbitrarily categorized into three groups: Group 1 - age < 50 years; Group 2 - age ≥ 50 and < 70 years; and Group 3 - age ≥ 70 years.

RESULTS

Of 284 patients identified, 278 were evaluable. The number of patients in each age group was: Group 1 - 51; Group 2 - 140; and Group 3 - 93. Baseline and treatment characteristics, tumor stage, rates of overall acute toxicity, need for unplanned treatment breaks and chemotherapy delivery were largely similar across the age groups. However, nine patients in Group 3 did not complete CRT, compared with five and none in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.006). In addition, five patients in Group 3 had diarrhea requiring treatment break, compared with none in the other two groups (p = 0.004). At a median follow-up 5.3 years, there was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.11), disease-free survival (p = 0.22) or local-recurrence free survival (p = 0.34), across the three age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT is safe and tolerable in the elderly age group, and provides equivalent disease control rates compared with the younger age group. Age alone should therefore not preclude aggressive curative treatment.

Results of age-dependent anal canal cancer treatment: a single centre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Information concerning management of anal canal cancer among the elderly is scarce and much less abundant than for younger subjects.

POPULATION AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 115 patients treated for anal epidermoid cancer between 2000 and 2010. The population was divided according to age (<70 years and ≥70 years).

RESULTS

Of the 115 patients, 81 (70.4%) were <70 years old and 34 were ≥70 years (29.6%). Tumour characteristics were identical between the two groups and median follow-up was 62 months. Elderly patients had a less favourable performance status (p=0.001) and fewer had received radiochemotherapy (61.8% vs 82.5%, p=0.004). Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity was observed more often among elderly subjects. The results at 5 years were less favourable for overall, disease-specific, and disease-free survival (respectively p=0.002, p=0.001, and p=0.001). For patients treated with a curative intent, at 5 years there was no difference between the two groups in terms of overall survival (p=0.2). However, there was a statistically significant difference in favour of the younger group for disease-free survival and metastasis-free survival.

CONCLUSION

If radiochemotherapy can be delivered to elderly subjects with a good general status, the effects appear less favourable than in younger patients.

Nomograms for predicting local recurrence, distant metastases, and overall survival for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer on the basis of European randomized clinical trials

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop accurate models and nomograms to predict local recurrence, distant metastases, and survival for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery and to allow for a selection of patients who may benefit most from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and close follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All data (N = 2,795) from five major European clinical trials for rectal cancer were pooled and used to perform an extensive survival analysis and to develop multivariate nomograms based on Cox regression. Data from one trial was used as an external validation set. The variables used in the analysis were sex, age, clinical tumor stage stage, tumor location, radiotherapy dose, concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery procedure, and pTNM stage. Model performance was evaluated by the concordance index (c-index). Risk group stratification was proposed for the nomograms.

RESULTS

The nomograms are able to predict events with a c-index for external validation of local recurrence (LR; 0.68), distant metastases (DM; 0.73), and overall survival (OS; 0.70). Pathologic staging is essential for accurate prediction of long-term outcome. Both preoperative CRT and adjuvant chemotherapy have an added value when predicting LR, DM, and OS rates. The stratification in risk groups allows significant distinction between Kaplan-Meier curves for outcome.

CONCLUSION

The easy-to-use nomograms can predict LR, DM, and OS over a 5-year period after surgery. They may be used as decision support tools in future trials by using the three defined risk groups to select patients for postoperative chemotherapy and close follow-up (http://www.predictcancer.org).

Combined modality chemoradiation in elderly oesophageal cancer patients

We present a single institution experience with 5-FU, mitomycin-C based chemoradiation for the primary treatment of elderly patients with oesophageal cancer. Twenty-five patients with a median age of 77 years (range 66-88) with a diagnosis of stage II-III squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus were treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering from 1996 to 2001 with two cycles of concurrent 5-FU, mitomycin-C and 50.4 Gy. Owing to age and comorbidity, these patients were not considered surgical candidates. The Charlson comorbidity score was used to evaluate patient comorbidity. Nine patients (36%) experienced grade 3-4 haematologic toxicity. Of the 23 patients evaluable for response, 17 patients (68%) had a negative post-treatment endoscopy and CT scan without evidence of progressive disease. Eleven patients (44%) are alive and 10 (40%) remain without evidence of recurrent or progressive oesophageal cancer at a median follow-up of 35 months. The median overall survival was 35 months and 2-year survival 64%. There was no significant difference in overall survival between Charlson score /=2 (P=0.10). Similar survival was observed for patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous carcinoma. Primary chemoradiation with two cycles of 5-FU, mitomycin-C, and 50.4 Gy in elderly patients is an active regimen with moderate toxicity, despite the advanced age and heavy comorbidity burden of this cohort. Patients with local/regional oesophageal cancer with adequate functional status should not be excluded from potentially curative treatment based on age alone.

Anal carcinoma of the elderly treated with radiotherapy alone or with concomitant radio-chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To analyse the results achieved with radio-chemotherapy (RTCT) or radiotherapy alone (RT) in elderly patients (pts) affected with squamous cell anal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1990 to 2002, 62 pts aged > or =70 years were treated with RT (14) or RTCT (48). There were 9 stage I, 29 stage II, 11 stage IIIa and 13 stage IIIb. MMC+5FU was given concomitantly with RT in an early period, later replaced by Cddp+5FU. In the RTCT group, 36Gy were delivered to pelvic+inguinal lymph nodes, with a tumor boost (18Gy).

RESULTS

Stage II fared significantly better than stage III in terms of locoregional control (LRC) but not overall survival (OS). Pts treated with RTCT had improved LRC, but not OS. LRC was 81% at 3 and 5 years for the RTCT group; the RT group had a LRC of 61% at 3 years. There were more locoregional relapses in the MMC group (29%) versus the Cddp group (19%) and in pts treated with a split (32%) versus no split (19%). No G3 acute toxicity was observed in the RT group; in the RTCT group 15 pts (31%) developed a G3+ acute toxicity. G3+ late damage occurred in 2 pts in the RT only group and in 3 pts in the RTCT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly people considered fit for RTCT should undergo the same schedules used for younger people. MMC or Cddp+5FU are feasible in the elderly, even without a planned split.

Effective treatment of anal cancer in the elderly with low-dose chemoradiotherapy

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is accepted as the standard initial treatment for squamous cell anal cancer. However, frail elderly patients cannot always tolerate full-dose CRT. This paper reports the results of a modified regimen for this group of patients. In all, 16 patients with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal or margin and performance status or co-morbidity precluding the use of full-dose CRT were included in this protocol. The median age was 81 (range 77-91). Patients received a dose of 30 Gy to the gross tumour volume plus 3 cm margin in all directions. Concurrent chemotherapy comprised 5-fluorouracil 600 mg m(-2) given over 24 h on days 1-4 of radiotherapy. The treatment was well tolerated. All 16 patients completed treatment as planned. Only one patient experienced any grade 3 toxicity (skin). The local control at a median follow-up of 16 months was 73% (13 out of 16). The overall survival was 69% and disease-specific survival 86%. This is a well-tolerated regimen for elderly/poor performance patients with anal cancer, which can achieve high rates of local control and survival. Longer follow-up will determine whether these encouraging results are maintained.

Who gets adjuvant treatment for stage II and III rectal cancer? Insight from surveillance, epidemiology, and end results--Medicare

PURPOSE

To examine the relationship between patient characteristics and the use of adjuvant pelvic radiation with and without chemotherapy among patients aged 65 years and older with stage II and III rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database identified 1,411 patients aged 65 and older with resected stage II and III rectal cancers diagnosed between 1992 and 1996. From claims submitted to Medicare, we measured the use of pelvic radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy and pre- or postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven percent of patients received radiation, 42% received chemotherapy and radiation, and 7% had treatment delivered preoperatively. Age was the strongest determinant of treatment: 73% of patients aged 65 to 69, 66% aged 70 to 75, 52% aged 75 to 79, 39% aged 80 to 84, and 21% aged 85 to 89 received radiation. The age trend remained strong after adjusting for other factors that predict receipt of treatment and after exclusion of patients with any evident comorbidity (P <.001). Patients were more likely to receive radiation treatment if they had an abdominal perineal resection, stage III disease, or a T4 tumor.

CONCLUSION

Because pelvic recurrences are a substantial cause of morbidity, further efforts are needed to ensure that elderly patients have the opportunity to make informed decisions regarding adjuvant treatment.

Brachytherapy in the elderly

A rapidly and constantly increasing aged population in the western countries poses a wide range of specific problems to oncologists. A different way to face medical issues should be sought for older patients with cancer, looking at the characteristics that are peculiar to the elderly from different points of view. Brachytherapy is an effective form of radiotherapy which, for its specific characteristics, may be a valid alternative to more complex modalities of treatment, thus allowing a better sparing of normal tissues and structures yet achieving a similar tumor control rate. This paper reviews the literature on the subject of cancer treatment in the elderly, focusing on radiotherapy and brachytherapy, to evaluate the current attitude toward this problem in the medical community and to see if it is possible to identify a patient population that will benefit from this technique.

Radical combined treatment of locally extensive head and neck cancer in the elderly

PURPOSE

Few studies have described the effects of aggressive combined therapy for locally extensive head and neck cancer in the elderly. Our study evaluated the outcome of this particular cohort of patients after such treatments.

METHODS

Survival, failure, morbidity, and complication rates were determined retrospectively in 43 elderly patients with stage III or IV head and neck cancer who underwent curative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (n = 33) or neoadjuvant, 3-drug chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (n = 10) between the years 1977 and 1992.

RESULTS

The crude survival rate at 3 years was 27% in patients managed by surgery plus radiotherapy, and 30% in individuals treated with chemoradiation; the corresponding locoregional failure rates were 23% and 30%; and the distant failure rates were 13% and 0%, respectively. The acute toxicity rate was 12% in the surgery plus radiotherapy group and 30% in the chemoradiation patients; the corresponding late complication rates were 0% and 10%. There were no toxic deaths.

CONCLUSION

Radical combined treatments can be performed safely and achieve long-term, disease-free survival in selected elderly patients with locally extensive head and neck cancer.

Radiation therapy of the older patient

Radiotherapy has a major role in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer therapy. It is widely used for curative and palliative treatment of cancer involving various sites. Radiotherapy is of particular benefit to older and frail cancer patients as an alternative to surgery and to systemic therapy. The available data on the sensitivity of normal tissues to radiotherapy in elderly patients strongly suggest that older patients with good functional status tolerate radiotherapy as well as younger patients and have comparable tumor response and survival rates. Aggressive radiotherapy should not be withheld from older patients because of chronological age alone.

Treatment of anal carcinoma in the elderly: feasibility and outcome of radical radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

For most cancers, information on treatment tolerance and results for elderly patients is quite limited. This study was conducted to investigate the feasibility and results of curative nonsurgical treatment of patients age 75 years or older with anal carcinoma.

METHODS

From January 1976 through June 1996, invasive anal squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 58 patients age > or = 75 years. Curative treatment was administered to 47 patients (81%), of whom 42 received radiotherapy (RT), either used alone (21) or associated with concomitant chemotherapy (CT). RT was administered in two sequences, the first in which a median dose of 39.6 gray (Gy) was delivered with megavoltage photon beams, followed (after a median interval of 43 days) by a boost with either brachytherapy or external beam (median dose, 20 Gy). CT started on Day 1 and generally consisted of 1 cycle of mitomycin C (MMC; median dose, 9.5 mg/m2) and a 96-hour infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; median dose, 600 mg/m2/day). The median follow-up for all patients was 48 months (range, 5-163 months).

RESULTS

Of 40 patients (95%) who completed curative treatment, acute toxicity resulted in shortening of the planned first irradiation sequence in 2 patients (1 in each group) and an unplanned treatment break in 11 patients (4 in the RT group and 7 in the RT-CT group). Grade 2 and 3 acute reactions (RTOG) were observed in 43% and 54% of patients, respectively. Among all Grade 3 reactions, 32% occurred in the RT group and 68% in the RT-CT group. In patients receiving RT-CT, Grade 2-3 leukopenia was observed in 25% of patients, Grade 2-3 fatigue was observed in 58% of patients, and Grade 2 cardiac toxicity related to 5-FU occurred in 1 patient. At 5 years, the overall survival was 54% (49% and 59% for the RT and RT-CT groups, respectively, P = 0.28), and the actuarial local control rate was 78.5% (73% and 83% for the RT and RT-CT groups, respectively, P=0.36). Five patients presented with Grade 3-4 late complications, all of them in the RT-CT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The current series confirms the feasibility of sphincter-conserving treatment for elderly patients who present with anal carcinoma. Rates of acute or late complications appeared similar to those observed in younger patients, and the oncologic results were at least as favorable as those commonly reported.