Impact of splenomegaly on therapeutic response and I-131-LYM-1 dosimetry in patients with B-lymphocytic malignancies

Radioinmunoterapia en los linfomas no Hodgkin: desarrollo histórico y estado actual

Radioimmunotherapy treatment for lymphoma is a novel targeted therapeutic approach. Several years of development of radioimmunotherapeutic compounds came to fruition in February of 2002 when 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin, Y2B8) was approved in the USA and later in Europe, for the treatment of relapsed or refractory, low grade or transformed B-cell lymphoma in the USA. 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan utilizes a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody to deliver beta-emitting yttrium-90 to the malignant B-cells. Clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy, with observed clinical responses in the 80 % range. This product has become available in Europe, with simplified administration, for the treatment of relapsed follicular lymphoma. A similar anti-CD20 radiotherapeutic compound, 131I-tositumomab, was subsequently approved in the USA. Promising studies exploring expanded applications of radioimmunotherapy as consolidation, as part of transplant, or in other histologic types have been recently completed or are under way. Radioimmunotherapy has been shown to be an effective and clinically relevant complementary therapeutic approach for patients with lymphoma, bringing the Nuclear Medicine into lymphoma therapeutics.

Splenic Volume Change and Nodal Tumor Response in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients after Radioimmunotherapy Using Radiolabeled Lym-1 Antibody

Splenomegaly is frequently found in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients. This study evaluated the implications of splenic volume change in response to radioimmunotherapy (RIT) using radiolabeled Lym- 1 antibody.

METHODS

Twenty-nine NHL patients treated with radiolabeled-Lym-1 and 9 breast cancer patients, the reference group, treated with radiolabeled ChL6, BrE-3, or m170, were analyzed using X-ray computer tomography (CT) splenic images obtained before and after RIT. Patient-specific radiation doses to the spleen were determined using actual splenic volume determined by CT and body weight.

RESULTS

Of 29 NHL patients, 13 that had splenic volumes equal or less than 310 mL, there was little or no change in splenic volume after RIT, despite splenic radiation doses as high as 23.1 Gy (median 8.0 Gy). Similarly, in a reference group of 9 breast cancer patients, there was little or no change in splenic volume after RIT, despite doses as high as 14.4 Gy (median 11.5 Gy). In the remaining 16 NHL patients, splenic volumes decreased in 13 patients, with initial volumes of 380-1,400 mL, by 68-548 mL despite splenic radiation doses as low as 1.1 Gy (median 3.2 Gy); splenic volumes increased in the other 3 patients after RIT. Although not statistically significant in this small series, therapeutic remission, defined conventionally by nodal tumor response, was more likely when splenic volume decreased after RIT. All 10 NHL patients with greater than a 15% decrease in their splenic volumes after RIT had nodal tumor response (5 complete response, 5 partial response). There were 12 responders (5 complete response and 7 partial response) in 19 NHL patients with less than a 15% decrease in splenic volume after RIT.

CONCLUSIONS

Splenic volume decreased in NHL patients with splenomegaly, despite splenic radiation dose as low as 1.1 Gy. In the absence of splenomegaly, splenic volume did not decrease, even after much higher radiation doses. RIT with radiolabeled-Lym-1 may benefit NHL patients with splenomegaly, with reduction in splenic volume likely owing to a therapeutic effect on malignant lymphocytes.

Radioimmunotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) treatment for lymphoma is a novel targeted therapeutic approach. Several years of development of radioimmunotherapeutic compounds came to fruition in February of 2002 when the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved yttrium 90 ((90)Y)-ibritumomab tiuxetan ((90)Y-IT) for the treatment of relapsed or refractory, low-grade, or transformed B-cell lymphoma. (90)Y-IT uses a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody to deliver beta-emitting (90)Y to the malignant B cells. Clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy, which is largely independent of the intrinsic activity of the anti-CD20 antibody. A similar anti-CD20 radiotherapeutic compound, iodine 131 ((131)I)-tositumomab ((131)I-T), is also under consideration for approval. The advantages of increased efficacy compared to the native antibody are gained at the expense of myelotoxicity, which is dose-limiting but reversible. Other radioimmunoconjugates (RIC), including products for Hodgkin's lymphoma, are in earlier stages of development. Studies exploring expanded applications of RIT are under way. RIT has been shown to be an effective and clinically relevant complementary therapeutic approach for patients with lymphoma.

Are radiometal-labeled antibodies better than iodine-131-labeled antibodies: comparative pharmacokinetics and dosimetry of copper-67-, iodine-131-, and yttrium-90-labeled Lym-1 antibody in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Radioimmunotherapy using radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies against tumor-associated antigens has been efficacious, particularly in the treatment of radiosensitive malignancies such as lymphoma. Antilymphoma monoclonal antibody Lym-1, labeled with copper-67 ((67)Cu), iodine-131 ((131)I), or yttrium-90 ((90)Y), has been effective salvage therapy for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Although (131)I has had the dominant role in radioimmunotherapy thus far, several properties of radiometals are preferable. A total of 70 patients with B-lymphocytic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were studied using (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1, (131)I-Lym-1, or (111)In-2IT-BAD-Lym-1. Because (90)Y does not have good emissions for imaging, indium-111 ((111)In), its analogue, was used as a surrogate to estimate (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 pharmacokinetics and radiation dosimetry. Subsets of four patients in each group received (67)Cu- and (131)I-labeled Lym-1 or (111)In- and (131)I-labeled Lym-1, allowing direct comparisons of the radioimmunoconjugates. Sequential blood samples and planar images were used to quantitate radioimmunoconjugate in tissues in order to determine pharmacokinetics and radiation dosimetry. (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1 and (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 exhibited higher cumulated activity concentrations and radiation absorbed doses per unit of administered radioactivity for tumors than did (131)I-Lym-1. The mean tumor cumulated activity (area under the time-activity curve) concentrations per unit of administered radioactivity for (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1, (131)I-Lym-1, and (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 were 96.89, 33.96, and 43.42 GBq-s/GBq/g, respectively. The mean tumor radiation doses from (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1, (131)I-Lym-1, and (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 were 2.5, 1.0, and 6.6 Gy/GBq, respectively, because (90)Y deposits more radiation per unit of administered radioactivity. Per unit of administered radioactivity, radiation doses from (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1 and (131)I-Lym-1 to normal tissues were similar except that the liver received a higher dose from (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1 than from (131)I-Lym-1; radiation doses to normal tissues from (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 were generally higher. Consequently, the therapeutic indices (ratio of radiation doses to tumor and normal tissues) for (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1, and less generally for (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1, were more favorable when compared to those for (131)I-Lym-1. Data from the matched subsets of patients showed similar therapeutic indices to those for the groups of patients. (67)Cu-2IT-BAT-Lym-1 showed more potential than (131)I-Lym-1 or (90)Y-2IT-BAD-Lym-1 for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma radioimmunotherapy.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia continues to attract much basic and clinical research interest. Despite recent advances, the disease still has no established cure. Nonetheless, significant strides have been made in our understanding of the genetics, biology, and clinical staging of this disease. This understanding may improve our ability to segregate patients into subtypes that differ in their cytogenesis, propensity toward disease progression, or response to standard or innovative forms of therapy. Finally, several promising new modalities of treatment are being evaluated in clinical trials, involving novel drugs or drug-combinations, monoclonal antibodies, stem cell transplantation, or gene therapy.