Report on Prostate Cancer Tumor Marker Workshop 1999

PSA and new biomarkers within multivariate models to improve early detection of prostate cancer

This review gives an overview of the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and percent free-PSA (%fPSA)-based artificial neural networks (ANNs) and logistic regression models (LR) to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. There is a clear advantage in including clinical data such as age, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) variables like prostate volume and PSA density as additional factors to tPSA and %fPSA within ANNs and LR models. There is also positive impact of tPSA and fPSA assays on the outcome of ANNs. New markers provide additional value within ANNs but to prove their clinical usefulness further testing is necessary.

Assay-specific artificial neural networks for five different PSA assays and populations with PSA 2-10 ng/ml in 4,480 men

Use of percent free PSA (%fPSA) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) can eliminate unnecessary prostate biopsies. In a total of 4,480 patients from five centers with PSA concentrations in the range of 2-10 ng/ml an IMMULITE PSA-based ANN (iANN) was compared with other PSA assay-adapted ANNs (nANNs) to investigate the impact of different PSA assays. ANN data were generated with PSA, fPSA (assays from Abbott, Beckman, DPC, Roche or Wallac), age, prostate volume, and DRE status. In 15 different ROC analyses, the area under the curve (AUC) in the PSA ranges 2-4, 2-10, and 4-10 ng/ml for the nANN was always significantly larger than the AUC for %fPSA or PSA. The nANN and logistic regression models mostly also performed better than the iANN. Therefore, for each patient population, PSA assay-specific ANNs should be used to optimize the ANN outcome in order to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.

Clinical utility of human glandular kallikrein 2 within a neural network for prostate cancer detection

OBJECTIVE

To assess, using artificial neural networks (ANNs), human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and percentage free/total PSA (f/tPSA), for discriminating between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Serum samples from 475 patients with prostate cancer (n = 347) or BPH (n = 128) within the PSA range of 1-20 ng/mL were analysed for tPSA, fPSA and hK2 (research assay, Toronto, Canada). Data were analysed in the ranges of 1-4, 2-4, 4-10, and 2-20 ng/mL tPSA. Back-propagation ANN models with the variables PSA, f/tPSA, and hK2, hK2/fPSA and hK2/(f/tPSA) were constructed. The diagnostic validity was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Whereas the median concentration of hK2 was not significantly different between patients with BPH or prostate cancer in any of the tPSA ranges, the f/tPSA, hK2/fPSA and hK2/(f/tPSA), and the hK2-based ANN outputs were always significantly different between patients with prostate cancer or BPH. Using ROC curve comparison, all variables were significantly better than hK2 in all ranges. The hK2-based ANN performed better than f/tPSA except in the 4-10 ng/mL tPSA range. At 90% and 95% sensitivity, the hK2-based ANN was also significantly better than f/tPSA in the 1-4 ng/mL tPSA range. hK2/(f/tPSA) achieved equal results to the hK2-based ANN except in the range 2-20 ng/mL tPSA.

CONCLUSIONS

The hK2-based ANN improves the outcome of f/tPSA but not hK2/(f/tPSA) in almost all analysed subgroups. When comparing the results at 90% and 95% sensitivity the hK2-based ANN only performed significantly better than f/tPSA in the lowest tPSA range. Only in lower tPSA ranges do hK2-based ANNs show an advantage for further improving prostate cancer detection.

Multicenter Evaluation of an Artificial Neural Network to Increase the Prostate Cancer Detection Rate and Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies

Background: The percentage of free prostate-specific antigen (%fPSA) has been shown to improve specificity for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) over total PSA (tPSA). A multicenter study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of a %fPSA-based artificial neural network (ANN) in men with tPSA concentrations between 2 and 20 μg/L for detecting patients with increased risk of a positive prostate biopsy for cancer.

Methods: We enrolled 1188 men from six different hospitals with PCa or benign prostates between 1996 and 2001. We used a newly developed ANN with input data of tPSA, %fPSA, patient age, prostate volume, and digital rectal examination (DRE) status to calculate the risk for the presence of PCa within different tPSA ranges (2–4, 4.1–10, 2–10, 10.1–20, and 2–20 μg/L) at the 90% and 95% specificity or sensitivity cutoffs, depending on the tPSA concentration. ROC analysis and cutoff calculations were used to estimate the diagnostic improvement of the ANN compared with %fPSA alone.

Results: In the low tPSA range (2–4 μg/L), the ANN detected 72% and 65% of cancers at specificities of 90% or 95%, respectively. At 4–10 μg/L tPSA, the ANN detected 90% and 95% of cancers with specificities of 62% and 41%, respectively. Use of the ANN with 2–10 μg/L tPSA enhanced the specificity of %fPSA by 20–22%, thus reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies.

Conclusions: Enhanced accuracy of PCa detection over that obtained using %fPSA alone can be achieved with a %fPSA-based ANN that also includes clinical information from DRE and prostate volume measurements.

An artificial neural network considerably improves the diagnostic power of percent free prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer diagnosis: results of a 5-year investigation

Our study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of %fPSA alone and combined with an ANN at different PSA concentration ranges, including the low range 2-4 ng/ml, to improve the risk assessment of prostate cancer. A total of 928 men with prostate cancer and BPH without any pretreatment of the prostate in the PSA range 2-20 ng/ml were enrolled in the study between 1996 and 2001. An ANN with input data of PSA, %fPSA, patient's age, prostate volume and DRE status was developed to calculate the individual's risk before performing a prostate biopsy within the different PSA ranges 2-4, 4.1-10 and 10.1-20 ng/ml. ROC analysis and cut-off calculations were used to estimate the diagnostic improvement of %fPSA and ANN in comparison to PSA. At the 90% sensitivity level, %fPSA and ANN performed better than PSA in all ranges, enhancing the specificity by 15-28% and 32-44%, respectively. For the low PSA range 2-4 ng/mL, we recommend a first-time biopsy at an ANN specificity level of 90%. For PSA 4-10 ng/mL, we recommend a first-time biopsy based on the ANN at the 90% sensitivity level. Use of an ANN enhances the %fPSA performance to further reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies within the PSA range 2-10 ng/ml.