Comparative sensitivities of ThinPrep and Papanicolaou smear for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and combined AIS/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL): comparison with HSIL

BACKGROUND

Despite the historic belief that cytologic screening offers little protection against cervical adenocarcinoma (CAC), there is emerging evidence that, by detecting the precursor lesion, adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), cervical screening may reduce the incidence of CAC as it has for cervical squamous carcinoma. Because liquid-based cytology is fast replacing the conventional Papanicolaou smear (PS), it is important to establish that it is at least as effective in detecting AIS.

METHODS

The authors calculated the sensitivities of PS and ThinPrep (TP) for 100 women with histologic AIS (from 160 PS slides and 60 TP slides), for 94 women with AIS+high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (from 151 PS slides and 50 TP slides), and for 558 women with HSIL (from 788 PS slides and 383 TP slides). All smears were taken up to 36 months before the histologic diagnosis.

RESULTS

In no category was there a significant difference between PS sensitivity and TP sensitivity. The HSIL category had a significantly higher overall sensitivity than the other categories. However, when sensitivity was defined as cytologic detection of high-grade disease, there was no difference between any of the categories. For the detection of a high-grade glandular lesion, the presence of a concurrent histologic HSIL was associated with reduced sensitivity for the detection of AIS.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results indicated that it may prove possible for cervical screening, with either PS or TP, to reduce the incidence of CAC.

Follow-up of Cytologic Predictions of Endocervical Glandular Abnormalities: Histologic Outcomes in 123 Cases

OBJECTIVES

To determine histologic positive predictive values (PPVs) for three categories of cytologic reports of endocervical glandular abnormalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We obtained histologic follow-up for 100% of 67 cytologic predictions of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and 82% of 39 predictions of possible AIS (?AIS) made over a 4-year period (1999-2002) and for 25% of 105 atypical endocervical cells (AEC) predictions over a 12-month period (2000). For each category of cytologic report, we determined the histologic yields of high-grade lesions overall and of high-grade glandular lesions.

RESULTS

PPVs for predictions of AIS and ?AIS for high-grade lesions overall were 91% and 75% (p = .032), respectively, and those for high-grade glandular lesions were 88% and 72% (p = .046), respectively. For a cytologic report of AEC, of those with histologic follow-up, 9% had a high-grade lesion and 7% had a high-grade glandular lesion.

CONCLUSION

Cytology can accurately predict AIS.

An audit of cervical smears reported to contain atypical glandular cells

The terminology and classification system for the reporting of cervical smears is currently under review. However, evidence on which to base the reporting of atypical cervical glandular cells is lacking. This audit of glandular atypia reporting in cervical smears provides evidence to support a three-tier sub-classification system for cervical glandular atypia. The three sub-classifications are distinct with respect to their positive predictive values and to the cell type of the abnormality as confirmed by histology and therefore relate to further clinical investigation.

Severe cervical glandular cell lesions and severe cervical combined lesions

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the current study was to determine the accuracy of routinely screened cervical smears to predict a glandular cell lesion in histologically confirmed cases of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), invasive adenocarcinoma (ADCA), adenosquamous carcinoma (ADSQCA), and severe combined glandular and squamous cell lesions.

METHODS

Between 1989-2000, a total of 1,141 women with a histologic diagnosis of cervical AIS, ADCA, ADSQCA, and combined lesions (glandular cell lesion with a coexistent squamous cell lesion) were registered in the Dutch National Pathology Archive (PALGA). In 1054 of these 1,141 histologic cases, an additional conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smear diagnosis was registered from the same patient. Material was evaluated with regard to the accuracy of cytologic diagnosis, the percentage of combined lesions, the mean age of the patients, and the time interval between AIS and ADCA.

RESULTS

Of 1,141 registered histologic cases, 57.5% were registered as having an "intraepithelial" lesion, whereas 42.5% were registered as having an "invasive" process. A combined process was diagnosed in 63.2% of cases. From the same patients, a cytologic diagnosis of a severe cervical epithelial lesion was registered in PALGA for 91.2% (n = 961) of 1054 cases. A cytologic registration of a severe glandular cell lesion (with or without a squamous cell component) was made in 547 cases (51.9%). Prediction of a severe glandular cell lesion on the Pap smear was found to be more accurate in cases of histologically confirmed pure glandular cell abnormalities than in cases with a histologic diagnosis of a combined lesion. The cytologic prediction was found to be correct in 75.2% of cases of pure AIS and 47.3% of cases of AIS with coexistent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL) (cervical intraepithelial lesion [CIN] type 2 [CIN 2] or CIN 3). The mean ages of the patients with AIS and AIS + HGSIL were 37.3 years and 34 years, respectively, whereas the mean age of the patients with ADCA and ADCA + HGSIL was 41.9 years and 38.1 years, respectively. The interval between the average ages of patients with AIS and ADCA and those with AIS + HGSIL and ADCA + HGSIL was 4.6 years and 4.1 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of a data search of the PALGA registry, it can be concluded that in a relatively large number of cases a severe cervical glandular cell lesion was not diagnosed on the Pap smear. Furthermore, data demonstrated that the prediction of a glandular abnormality is less accurate in cases of combined squamoglandular cell lesions than in pure glandular cell lesions.

Predictive value of diagnoses of endocervical glandular abnormalities in cervical smears

AIMS

To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of cervical smear diagnoses of 'definite' and 'possible' endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ or invasive adenocarcinoma, and whether diagnostic accuracy can be improved.

METHODS

The study examined cervical smears reported as definite or possible high-grade glandular abnormality between 1992 and 1998. PPV was calculated by comparing smear diagnoses with the subsequent histopathology report. All available smears were reviewed without knowledge of follow-up results, and were reclassified by consensus.

RESULTS

Thirty-two smears were diagnosed as high-grade glandular lesions, with adequate biopsy follow-up in 31 cases (96.9%). A high-grade epithelial abnormality (HGEA) was detected in 29 cases (PPV, 93.5%), with a high-grade glandular lesion in 24 (PPV, 77.4%). Very few smears were reclassified on review. Seventy-three smears were initially diagnosed in the 'inconclusive' glandular or indeterminate cell-type category. There was adequate biopsy follow up for 54 cases (74.0%). On follow-up, 31 cases had a HGEA (PPV, 57.4%), with 14 cases having a high-grade glandular abnormality (PPV, 25.9%). In the review of 'inconclusive' smears, 12 were reclassified as squamous abnormalities and none of these had a glandular lesion on biopsy. Eight were reclassified as negative; seven contained endometrial stroma and the glandular cells in question were considered to be of lower uterine segment (LUS) origin. No significant lesion was present on follow-up of these cases.

CONCLUSIONS

For clinicians using our laboratory, large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) or cone biopsy should follow a 'definite' cytological diagnosis of a high-grade endocervical glandular lesion. However, cone biopsy may not be the appropriate initial management in the 'possible' high-grade glandular group because of a significantly lower predictive value of the diagnosis. The slide review highlighted the importance of (1) caution in classifying sheets of abnormal cells as glandular, and (2) endometrial stroma as a marker of LUS material.

Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix

BACKGROUND

The current study examines 1) the sensitivity of detection and 2) sampling and screening/diagnostic error in the cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the cervix. The data were taken from public and private sector screening laboratories reporting 25,000 and 80,000 smears, respectively, each year.

METHODS

The study group was comprised of women with a biopsy diagnosis of AIS or AIS combined with a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) who were accessioned by the Western Australian Cervical Cytology Registry (WACCR) between 1993-1998. Cervical smears reported by the Western Australia Centre for Pathology and Medical Research (PathCentre) or Western Diagnostic Pathology (WDP) in the 36 months before the index biopsy was obtained were retrieved. A true measure of the sensitivity of detection could not be determined because to the authors' knowledge the exact prevalence of disease is unknown at present. For the current study, sensitivity was defined as the percentage of smears reported as demonstrating a possible or definite high-grade epithelial abnormality (HGEA), either glandular or squamous. Sampling error was defined as the percentage of smears found to have no HGEA on review. Screening/diagnostic error was defined as the percentage of smears in which HGEA was not diagnosed initially but review demonstrated possible or definite HGEA. Sensitivity also was calculated for a randomly selected control group of biopsy proven cases of Grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 3) accessioned at the WACCR in 1999.

RESULTS

For biopsy findings of AIS alone, the diagnostic "sensitivity" of a single smear was 47.6% for the PathCentre and 54.3% for WDP. Nearly all the abnormalities were reported as glandular. The sampling and screening/diagnostic errors were 47.6% and 4.8%, respectively, for the PathCentre and 33.3% and 12.3%, respectively, for WDP. The results from the PathCentre were better for AIS plus HSIL than for AIS alone, but the results from WDP were similar for both groups. For the CIN 3 control cases, the "sensitivity" of a single smear was 42.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors' knowledge epidemiologic studies published to date have not demonstrated a benefit from screening for precursors of cervical adenocarcinoma. However, in the study laboratories as in many others, reasonable expertise in diagnosing AIS has been acquired only within the last 10-15 years, which may be too short a period in which to demonstrate a significant effect. The results of the current study provide some encouraging baseline data regarding the sensitivity of the Papanicolaou smear in detecting AIS. Further improvements in sampling and cytodiagnosis may be possible.

Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): Interobserver reproducibility in cervical smears and corresponding thin-layer preparations

Five panelists independently reviewed 135 consecutive conventional cervical smears (CPs) originally classified as atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS). A thin-layer slide (TP), prepared from the residual material, also was reviewed in each case. All patients underwent colposcopy that yielded at least 1 histologic specimen. Three or more of 5 reviewers retained the AGUS interpretation for 29% of CPs and 12% of the corresponding TPs. Interobserver variability infrequency of use of AGUS was marked, and interobserver agreement was poor. Agreement was improved for cases cytologically interpreted as a high-grade lesion, especially in TPs. Four of 5 reviewers retained the AGUS classification in CPs for all 7 biopsy-proven neoplastic glandular lesions. Of 95 CP interpretations made by 5 reviewers in the 19 histologically diagnosed high-grade lesions, 8 were "negative/reactive" and 6 were AGUS "favor reactive." AGUS is a poorly reproducible cytologic interpretation. Although most neoplastic glandular lesions may be distinguished by cytopathologists experienced in this area from mimics originally considered AGUS, attempts to increase the diagnostic specificity of AGUS may diminish sensitivity for an underlying high-grade precursor. Interobserver agreement was better for TPs than for the corresponding CPs. However, the split-sample TP slides may not have been fully comparable to the CPs.

Clinical implications of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, favor endometrial origin

BACKGROUND

The Bethesda System recommends qualifying atypical glandular cells with regard to their possible origin: endocervical versus endometrial. This study was undertaken to determine the clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance that favor an endometrial origin (AGUS-EM).

METHODS

A computer search identified 62 cervicovaginal smears (5.25% of all smears classified as AGUS) with a diagnosis of AGUS-EM in the files of Shared Cytopathology Laboratory of New York University Medical Center/Bellevue Hospital Medical Center between January 1995 and December 1999. The patients ranged in age from 29 years to 88 years (mean age, 53 years). Thirty-four patients were postmenopausal (55%), and 5 patients were on hormonal replacement therapy. Follow-up was available for 56 patients (90%); 45 patients (73%) underwent biopsy, and 11 patients (17%) had repeat cervicovaginal smears. Six patients were lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

Among patients who underwent biopsy, 14 patients (31%) had a clinically significant uterine lesions, including 6 (13%) endometrial adenocarcinomas, 5 (11%) endometrial hyperplasias, and 3 (7%) squamous lesions (2 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and 1 squamous cell carcinoma). Ten of 11 patients with significant endometrial pathology findings were postmenopausal. The remaining 31 patients had benign pathology results, which included chronic cervicitis, endometritis, endometrial polyps, microglandular hyperplasia, and tubal metaplasia. Among the patients with repeat cervicovaginal smears, one patient had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; the remaining patients were within normal limits.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of women with a diagnosis of AGUS-EM had a significant uterine lesion on subsequent biopsy; the majority of these lesions were endometrial in origin. Patients with a diagnosis of AGUS-EM on cervicovaginal smears should be followed closely, and endometrial curettage or biopsy should be included in their initial work-up.

Adenocarcinoma in situ and early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix

As data continue to accumulate, the clinical characteristics of preinvasive and early invasive glandular cervical neoplasia are becoming progressively better defined. Cytologic screening for these lesions is imprecise; however, modifications to current classification systems may improve the overall accuracy. All glandular abnormalities on the Papanicolaou smear, nevertheless, require judicious evaluation and careful follow-up. Cervical conization is the most definitive means of diagnosing adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS). Because ACIS has been thought to represent a multifocal process, with negative conization margins having limited predictive value, conservative management protocols have been difficult to endorse. Several large studies now indicate that the surgical margin status may be a more reliable indicator of true disease clearance than previously thought. For young patients desiring to maintain reproductive capacity, ACIS appears to be safely managed by cold-knife conization combined with diligent surveillance. Early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix is associated with an excellent prognosis, and recent data suggest that radical surgery may be unnecessary.