Retrospective comparative study of primary intracoronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

Safety and Efficacy of Direct Angioplasty in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Due to Atherosclerosis

Background and Purpose: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is one of the promising treatment options in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD)-related basilar artery occlusion (BAO). In this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of direct angioplasty (DA) with stent-retriever thrombectomy (SRT) with or without rescue treatment in ICAD-related BAO.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 187 patients who underwent EVT for BAO from January 2012 to July 2018. We identified patients who underwent EVT due to ICAD-related BAO. Patients who accepted SRT with or without rescue treatment were classified into the SRT group. Patients treated with DA with or without stent placement were classified into DA group. Clinical and laboratory findings and outcomes were compared between groups.

Results: A total of 108 patients were enrolled, among them 77 underwent SRT and 31 underwent DA; 61 (79.2%) SRT group patients underwent angioplasty with or without stent placement. Compared with patients in the SRT group, those in the DA group experienced a significantly shorter procedure time [60 min (60–120 min) vs. 120 min (60–120 min); p = 0.038] and a lower number of device passes [2 passes (1–2 passes) vs. 3 passes (2–4 passes); p < 0.001]. No significant differences in balloon angioplasty (35.5 vs. 22.1%; p = 0.150), emergent stent placement (64.5 vs. 57.1%; p = 0.481), successful recanalization (93.5 vs. 85.7%; p = 0.340), embolization in distal or new territory (3.2 vs. 9.1%, p = 0.314), and reocclusion (22.6 vs. 9.1%; p = 0.109) among DA and SRT groups were found. Additionally, no differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage incidence [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.74; 95% CI, 0.06–9.44; p = 0.815], functional independence (adjusted OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.50–4.16; p = 0.497), and mortality rate (adjusted OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.06–2.04; p = 0.247) were noted among groups.

Conclusions: In certain patients with ICAD-related BAO, DA may shorten procedure time and reduce required device passes compared to SRT. In this study, DA was retrospectively found to be of similar safety and efficacy as SRT.

Midterm clinical and angiographic follow-up for the first Food and Drug Administration-approved prospective, Single-Arm Trial of Primary Stenting for Stroke: SARIS (Stent-Assisted Recanalization for Acute Ischemic Stroke)

BACKGROUND

Although early data demonstrate encouraging angiographic results following intracranial stent deployment for acute ischemic stroke, longer-term follow-up is necessary to evaluate the clinical outcomes, as well as the durability of angiographic results.

OBJECTIVE

We report 6-month clinical and radiologic follow-up data of the 20 patients prospectively enrolled in the Stent-Assisted Recanalization in acute Ischemic Stroke (SARIS) trial.

METHODS

Twenty patients were prospectively enrolled to receive self-expanding intra-arterial stents as first-line therapy for acute ischemic stroke treatment. Patients were scheduled for follow-up 6-months after treatment for clinical evaluation (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score obtained by a trained certified research nurse/nurse practitioner) and repeat cerebral angiography. Angiographic interpretation was performed by an independent adjudicator.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the mRS score was ≤3 in 60% of patients (n = 12) and was ≤2 in 55% of patients (n = 11). Mortality at the 6-month follow-up was 35% (n = 7). Follow-up angiography was performed for 85% (11 of 13) of surviving patients. All patients undergoing angiographic follow-up demonstrated Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 3 flow on digital subtraction angiography or stent patency on computed tomographic angiography. None of the patients demonstrated evidence of in-stent stenosis (≥50% vessel narrowing).

CONCLUSION

The midterm angiographic and clinical results following intracranial stent deployment for acute ischemic stroke are encouraging. Further study of primary stent-for-stroke treatment is warranted.

Use of a vascular reconstruction device to salvage acute ischemic occlusions refractory to traditional endovascular recanalization methods

Object

Acute revascularization has been associated with improved stroke outcomes. The Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism (PROACT II) trial achieved recanalization rates of 66%. The Multi Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (Multi MERCI) trial achieved recanalization in 70% of patients. However, these interventional tools are not always successful. The Enterprise vascular reconstruction device was recently introduced for treatment of cerebral aneurysms previously untreatable with endovascular techniques. The authors evaluated a multicenter experience using this stent as a salvage revascularization tool for acute stroke treatment.

Methods

Four medical centers participated in a retrospective review of endovascularly treated patients with acute stroke for cases treated with the Enterprise stent after routine interventions had been unsuccessful. Data collected included preprocedure information, intraprocedure findings, and outcomes.

Results

Twenty patients with acute stroke (mean age 61.6 ± 22 years) were treated with the Enterprise stent. Ten patients received intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator before catheter intervention, without improvement. Intraarterial interventions attempted unsuccessfully before Enterprise deployment included the Merci retriever (12 patients), angioplasty (7 patients), glycoprotein IIb–IIIa inhibitor administration (12 patients), intraarterial nitroglycerin (1 patient), Wingspan stent deployment (3 patients), and Xpert stent deployment (1 patient). The mean preintervention National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 17 ± 6 (median 17). All patients presented with a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score of 0 or 1. Revascularization was achieved in all patients (75% with a TIMI score of 3, 25% with a TIMI score of 2). Improvement (≥ 4 points on the NIHSS) was documented in 75% of patients. Mean NIHSS improvement from intervention to discharge was 8 ± 7 points (median 9 points).

Conclusions

These preliminary data suggest a potential benefit to the use of the Enterprise stent when routine intervention methods fail.

First Food and Drug Administration-approved prospective trial of primary intracranial stenting for acute stroke: SARIS (stent-assisted recanalization in acute ischemic stroke)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Acute revascularization is associated with improved outcomes in ischemic stroke patients. However, it is unclear which method of intraarterial intervention, if any, is ideal. Numerous case series and cardiac literature parallels suggest that acute stenting may yield high revascularization levels with low associated morbidity. We therefore conducted a Food and Drug Administration-approved prospective pilot trial to evaluate the safety of intracranial stenting for acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included presentation <or=8 hours after stroke onset, age 18 years or older, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >or=8, angiographic demonstration of focal intracerebral artery occlusion <or=14 mm, and either contraindication to intravenous tissue plasminogen activator or failure to improve 1 hour after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator administration. Exclusion criteria included known hemorrhagic diathesis or coagulopathy, platelet count <100 000, intracranial hemorrhage, blood glucose level of <51 mg/100 mL, or CT perfusion imaging demonstrating more than one-third at-risk territory with nonsalvageable brain (low cerebral blood volume). Data are presented as mean+/-SD.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled (mean age, 63+/-18 years;14 women). Mean presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 14+/-3.8 (median 13). Presenting thrombolysis in myocardial infarction score was 0 (85% of patients) or 1 (15%). Recanalization to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction score of 3 (60% of patients) or 2 (40% of patients; P<0.0001) was achieved. One (5%) symptomatic and 2 (10%) asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhages occurred. At 1-month follow-up, a modified Rankin scale score of <or=3 was achieved in 12 of 20(60%) patients and a modified Rankin scale score of <or=1 was achieved in 9 of 20 (45%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This Food and Drug Administration-approved prospective study suggests primary intracranial stenting for acute stroke may be a valuable addition to the stroke treatment armamentarium.

Stent-assisted intracranial recanalization for acute stroke: early results

OBJECTIVE

In patients who are not candidates for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, intra-arterial (IA) therapy is an alternative. Current recanalization rates are 50 to 60% for IA thrombolysis. Stent-assisted recanalization in the setting of acute stroke after failed thrombolysis may improve recanalization rates.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 19 patients treated at two institutions between July 2001 and March, 2005 with intracranial stenting of a vessel resistant to standard thrombolytic techniques. Demographics, clinical, and radiographic presentation and outcomes were studied.

RESULTS

Thirteen men and six women with a median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 16 (range, 15-22) were included. Eight lesions were located at the internal carotid artery terminus, seven in the M1/M2 segment, and four in the basilar artery. Average time-to-treatment was 210 +/- 160 minutes. Overall recanalization rate (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Grade 2 or 3) was 79%. There were six deaths: five due to progression of stroke and withdrawal of care at the family's request and one as the result of a delayed carotid injury after tracheostomy. One postoperative asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred without adverse affect on outcome. Median discharge NIHSS score of surviving patients was 5 (range, 2.5-11.5). Lesions at the internal carotid artery terminus (P < 0.009), older age (P < 0.003), and higher baseline NIHSS score (P < 0.009) were significant negative outcome predictors, as measured by >3 modified Rankin scale score at discharge.

CONCLUSION

Stent-assisted recanalization for acute stroke resulting from intracranial thrombotic occlusion is associated with a high recanalization rate and low intracranial hemorrhage rate. These initial results suggest that stenting may be an option for recalcitrant cerebral arterial occlusions.

Comparison of in-hospital outcomes after coronary angioplasty with or without stent placement for acute myocardial infarction

This study compared the in-hospital outcomes of patients treated with or without stent placement during mechanical revascularization for acute myocardial infarction. After correction for differences in baseline characteristics, patients treated with stent placement had lower in-hospital mortality.

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography (PTCA) in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) The study included patients with electrocardiographic signs of transmural AMI, symptom duration of less than 12 h, and with no contraindications to thrombolytic therapy. Patients who had undergone primary PTCA were matched consecutively, for age, gender, infarct localization and duration of symptoms, to patients who had received thrombolytic therapy (82 patients to each group). Patients who were admitted to hospital during daytime had a primary PTCA, whereas those admitted outside daytime were given thrombolytic therapy. In the primary PTCA group, 9 patients had a combined endpoint compared with 22 patients in the thrombolysis group (p < 0.02 ). In-hospital mortality was 3.7% in the PTCA group and 4.9% in the thrombolysis group (ns). At six months, a combined endpoint occurred in 23 patients in the primary PTCA group and in 50 patients in the thrombolysis group (p < 0.00005). Six months' mortality was 4.9% in the PTCA group and 7.3% in the thrombolysis group (ns). Among patients in the PTCA group, left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly higher, stay in hospital was shorter and there were significantly fewer incidences of heart failure and severe arrhythmias than among patients in the thrombolysis group. The results of primary PTCA implemented in our departments are comparable with those reported in randomized trials from experienced centres. Our study indicates that patients treated with primary PTCA have fewer complications, a better left ventricular systolic function and a shorter hospital stay compared with patients treated with thrombolysis.

The role of coronary angioplasty and stenting in acute myocardial infarction

Despite the improvements in the pharmacological treatment of acute myocardial infarction, it is recognised that thrombolysis fails to reproduce reperfusion in a significant proportion of patients. Coronary interventional techniques have been shown to offer an alternative reperfusion strategy. There is increasing evidence that mechanical reperfusion may offer significant advantages over established thrombolytic therapy.

Coronary stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to provide an overview on stenting in acute myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A search of MEDLINE and the scientific sessions abstracts in peer review journals through May 1998 was carried out to identify any publications on stenting in MI. The settings were retrospective and prospective case series on stenting in MI, nonrandomized and randomized trials comparing primary stenting and primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in MI, and stenting in cardiogenic shock complicating MI. Reported outcomes included procedural success, reocclusion, restenosis, and target vessel revascularization rates; incidence of death, MI, recurrent ischemia, major bleeding, and vascular complications; and incidence of cerebrovascular accidents. Procedural success rates were better for stenting than primary PTCA, and postprocedural minimum luminal diameters were larger. This resulted in lower reocclusion and restenosis rates and a lesser need for target vessel revascularization with primary stenting. The incidence of death, MI, and recurrent ischemia was also reduced with primary stenting. Major bleeding and vascular complications were confined to patients receiving anticoagulation as opposed to antiplatelet agents after stenting. Finally, a strategy of bailout stenting for failed PTCA in MI appears to be inferior to a primary stenting strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Stenting in MI is an effective and safe reperfusion strategy with many advantages compared with primary PTCA.

Hospital outcome after bailout coronary stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction

We evaluated the outcome of bailout coronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction. Fifty patients (35 men, mean age 60 plusmn; 12) with acute myocardial infarction consecutively underwent bailout stenting after primary and rescue coronary angioplasty (n=41 and 9, respectively). Cardiogenic shock was present in six patients, and 17 others had contraindications to thrombolysis. Stent implantation was successful in 49/50 patients. The antithrombotic regimen combined heparin, aspirin, and ticlopidine. One patient had symptomatic stent closure. Predischarge angiography in 41/44 survivors showed widely patent stents in 40/41 patients. Six patients (4 of whom had been admitted with cardiogenic shock) died in the hospital. During acute myocardial infarction, bailout stenting can achieve high TIMI grade 3 coronary patency (here, 92%), and low acute stent closure rates (here, 2%). However, in-hospital mortality remained high, at nearly 10%, mainly due to the severe risk profile in this patient subset.

Late clinical and angiographic follow-up after stenting in evolving and recent myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the late clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients who received stents within the first week of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated that stenting of the infarct-related artery is a useful adjunct to balloon angioplasty in patients with AMI. However, there are limited data on the late clinical and angiographic outcomes of these patients.

METHODS

Between January 1994 and September 1995, 32 patients at our institution underwent stenting of the infarct-related artery within 1 week of AMI: 13 within 14 hours (evolving group) and 19 between days 2 and 7 (recent AMI group). Late clinical follow-up was obtained on all survivors. Quantitative angiographic measurements were recorded on the stented segments before stenting, immediately after stenting, and on the follow-up angiograms.

RESULTS

At 13.1+/-6.4 months from the time of stenting, three patients died and three required repeat angioplasty, but no patient had reinfarction or required bypass surgery. At follow-up 26 (81%) of 32 patients remained free of major cardiac events; of these, 24 (92%) were free of angina. Repeat angiography performed at 10.8+/-7.5 months in 26 (87%) of 30 discharged patients showed that all infarct-related arteries were patent and the restenosis rate was low: 22% in the 13 patients with evolving AMI (<14 hours) and 12% in the 19 patients with recent AMI (days 2 through 7).

CONCLUSION

In this study stenting of the infarct-related artery in patients with evolving and recent AMI was associated with a favorable late clinical outcome. Patency of the infarct-related artery was well maintained, and the restenosis rate was low.