Fernández Ruiz A, J Del Cerro Marín M, Rubio Vidal D, C Castro Gussoni M, Moreno Granados F. [Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect with the Amplatz device: initial result and mid-term follow-up].
Rev Esp Cardiol 2001;
54:1190-6. [PMID:
11591300 DOI:
10.1016/s0300-8932(01)76478-0]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Percutaneous device occlusion of atrial septal defects (ASD) is, although with some limitations, an alternative to surgical closure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous ASD closure using the Amplatz device.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
From October 1999 to March 2000, 25 children underwent transcatheter closure of ASD at a mean +/- SD age of 8.7 +/- 3.1 years (range 3-15 years) and a mean weight of 31.8 +/- 16.7 kg (range 11-84 kg). Device selection was based on the stretched diameter of the ASD using the PTA OS balloon. The device was implanted under ultrasonographic and radiological guidance. All patients showed signs of volume-overload of the right ventricle. The ASD was single (n = 21), with two separate holes (n = 2), or cribiform (n = 2).
RESULTS
The median +/- SD size of the device used was 21.7 +/- 5.4 mm (range 15-36 mm). In twenty-two patients (88%) the device was successfully implanted. A repeat echocardiogram was performed the next day before discharge. Two patients underwent surgery after deployment of the device due to mitral valve dysfunction (n = 1) or residual leak (n = 1). In a patient with a two-hole ASD, another device was percutaneously withdrawn, while still attached to the delivery cable due to incomplete occlusion.
CONCLUSION
a) Transcatheter occlusion with the Amplatzer device is an effective treatment for ostium secundum atrial septal defects; b) the low complication rate and the short hospitalization period makes this procedure the treatment of choice in these patients, and c) ASD which are too large, cribiform or with deficient rims may require a different approach.
Collapse