Open renal arteries are better than closed renal arteries

Timing and selection for renal revascularization in an era of negative trials: what to do?

Management of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis has become more complex with advances in both medical therapy and endovascular procedures. Results from recent trials fail to demonstrate major benefits of endovascular stenting in addition to optimal medical therapy. The general applicability of these results to many patients is limited by short-term follow-up and selection biases in recruitment. Many patients at highest risk were excluded from these studies and some were included with trivial lesions. Identification of patients with hemodynamically significant lesions remains a challenge and has led to more stringent criteria for Doppler ultrasound, measurement of translesional gradients and quantitative angiography. Although many patients can now be managed with medical therapy, it should be recognized that long-term reduction in antihypertensive drug requirements and recovery of kidney function are limited to those undergoing renal revascularization. As with any major vascular lesion, follow-up for disease stability and/or progression is essential. The ambiguity of present trial data may lead some to overlook selected subgroups that would benefit from restoring renal blood supply through revascularization. Further studies to more precisely identify kidneys that can recover function and/or are beyond meaningful recovery are essential. Considering the comorbid risks for the atherosclerotic population, it will remain imperative for clinicians to consider the hazards, costs and benefits carefully for each patient to determine the role and timing for both medical therapy and revascularization.

[Abdominal aortic aneurysm and renovascular disease]

Recent technological advances in the diagnosis and therapy of abdominal aortic aneurysm and renovascular disease are continuing to bring about changes in the way patients suffering from these conditions are treated. The prevalence of both these conditions is increasing. This is due to greater life-expectancy in patients with arteriosclerosis, a pathogenetic factor underlying both conditions. The application of diagnostic imaging techniques to non-vascular conditions has led to the early diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Clinical suspicion of reno-vascular disease can be confirmed easily using high-resolution diagnostic imaging modalities such as CT angiography and magnetic resonance angiography. Endovascular intervention is successfully replacing conventional surgical repair techniques, with the result that it may be possible to improve outcome in both conditions using effective and minimally invasive approaches. Future technological developments will enable these endovascular techniques to be applied in the large majority of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm or renovascular disease.

Renal angioplasty and stenting under protection: The way for the future?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of renal artery angioplasty and stenting utilizing a distal protection device to reduce the risk of intraprocedural artery embolism and avoid deterioration of the renal function. Fifty-six hypertensive patients (32 men; mean age, 66 +/- 11.8 years; range, 22-87) with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (8 bilateral) underwent angioplasty and stenting with distal protection in 65 renal arteries (58 ostial lesions). Five patients had a solitary kidney, 18 a renal insufficiency. The lesion was crossed either with a GuardWire temporary occlusion balloon (n = 38), which was inflated to provide parenchyma protection or with a filter (EPI Filter; n = 26), or with Angioguard (n = 1), which allows a continuous flow. Generated debris was aspirated and analyzed. Blood pressure and serum creatinine levels were followed. Immediate technical success was 100%. All lesions except one were stented, either directly (43 ostial lesions) or after predilatation (22 ostial lesions). Visible debris were aspirated with the PercuSurge in all patients or removed with filters in 80% of the patients. Mean particle number and diameter were 98.1 +/- 60.0 per procedure (range, 13-208) and 201.0 +/- 76.0 microm (range, 38-6,206), respectively. Mean renal artery occlusion time was 6.55 +/- 2.46 min (range, 2.29-13.21) with the PercuSurge device. Mean time in situ (filters) was 4.25 +/- 1.12 min. Mean follow-up was 22.6 +/- 17.6 months (range, 1-47). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure declined from 169.0 +/- 15.2 and 104.0 +/- 13.0 mm Hg, respectively, to 149.7 +/- 12.4 and 92.7 +/- 6.7 mm Hg after the procedure. The mean creatinine level remains constant during the follow-up. At 6-month follow-up (45 patients), renal function did not deteriorate in any patient, whereas 8 patients with baseline renal insufficiency improved after the procedure. At 3 years (19 patients), renal function deteriorated only in 1 patient with renal insufficiency and in 1 patient treated for bilateral renal stenosis, one side without protection. These preliminary results suggest the feasibility and safety of distal protection during renal interventions to protect against atheroembolism and to avoid renal function deterioration. This technique's beneficial effects should be evaluated by randomized studies.

Percutaneous stenting of incidental unilateral renal artery stenosis: decision analysis of costs and benefits

PURPOSE

To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of prophylactic percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stent placement (PTA-S) in patients with incidentally discovered, asymptomatic renal artery stenosis (RAS) compared to delaying PTA-S until patients develop refractory hypertension or renal insufficiency (therapeutic PTA-S).

METHODS

The Markov decision analysis model was used to determine the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) saved for prophylactic PTA-S as compared to therapeutic PTA-S in a hypothetical cohort of patients with 50% unilateral atherosclerotic RAS followed from age 61 to death.

RESULTS

Prophylactic PTA-S compared to therapeutic PTA-S results in more QALYs/patient (10.9 versus 10.3) at higher lifetime costs ($23,664 versus $16,558). The incremental cost effectiveness of prophylactic PTA-S was estimated to be $12,466/QALY. Prophylactic stenting was not cost effective (>$50,000/QALY) if the modeled incidence of stent restenosis exceeded 15%/year and the incidence of progression in the contralateral renal artery was <2% of arteries/year.

CONCLUSIONS

PTA-S of incidental, asymptomatic unilateral RAS may improve patients' quality of life at an acceptable incremental cost. However, this technology should be used hesitantly until a randomized comparison confirms its effectiveness.

Prevalence of renal artery stenosis in high-risk veterans referred to cardiac catheterization

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) varies depending on patient selection with no specific guidelines on indications for selective renal angiography in patients referred for coronary angiography. The goal of this study is to determine the prevalence and predictors of renal artery stenosis in hypertensive veterans referred for coronary angiography.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary care veterans' administration facility in the USA.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

A total of 90 veterans referred for coronary angiography with an initial ascending aortic pressure > 135 mmHg.

INTERVENTIONS

Selective renal angiography was performed following coronary angiography.

RESULTS

We found that 28% of the patients had single RAS (> or = 50% stenosis), while 16% had single RAS > or = 70% stenosis, 10% had bilateral RAS >or = 50% and 6% had bilateral RAS > or = 70%. Significant positive univariate predictors of RAS (> or = 50%) were age, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), creatinine level (Cr) and myocardial infarction. Significant multivariate predictors of RAS (> or = 50%) were age > 65 years [relative risk (RR), 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), (1.2-10.6)], PVD [RR 3.2, 95% CI (1.1-9.1)] and Cr > 1 mg/dl [RR 4.9, 95% CI (1.53-15.9)]. No complications related to renal angiography were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective renal angiography during routine coronary angiography in hypertensive veterans with coronary artery disease is safe and uncovers RAS in many older patients with PVD and renal insufficiency.

Prevalence of renal artery stenosis requiring revascularization in patients initially referred for coronary angiography

To evaluate the prevalence of clinically significant renal artery stenosis (RAS) in patients referred for coronary angiography, we analyzed data on 2,439 consecutive patients. Patients underwent selective renal angiography in conjunction with coronary angiography if refractory hypertension (blood pressure > 140/90 on two drugs) or flash pulmonary edema was present. A total of 1,089 renal arteries of 534 patients were evaluated. Twelve percent (137/1,089) of the renal arteries in 19% (101/534) of patients had > 70% diameter stenosis in at least one vessel. Bilateral renal artery stenosis was present in 26% (26/101) of patients. One hundred and thirty-two of the 137 vessels underwent stent revascularization due to clinical renovascular hypertension. Acute clinical success (< 20% diameter stenosis without death or urgent surgery) was 98% (99/101). Due to high prevalence and effective available treatment, we recommend routine screening for RAS in all patients with refractory hypertension referred for coronary angiography.

Incidental renal artery stenosis among a prospective cohort of hypertensive patients undergoing coronary angiography

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility, safety, and clinical yield of angiographic screening among hypertensive patients undergoing coronary angiography.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a prospective cohort analysis of hypertensive patients who underwent cardiac catheterization at a tertiary care referral center from July 1998 to March 1999. Abdominal aortography was performed to screen for renal artery stenosis, the percentage of which was measured.

RESULTS

The mean +/- SD age of the 297 study patients was 64.9+/-10.2 years; 58.6% were male, and 98.0% were white. Mean +/- SD systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 142.8+/-22.5/79.6+/-11.4 mm Hg. Aortography required a mean incremental dose of 62+/-9 mL of nonionic contrast agent. No complications were attributable to aortography. Of 680 renal arteries, 611 (90%) were visualized adequately. Also, 53% of patients had normal renal arteries, 28% had stenoses less than 50%, and 19.2% had stenoses of 50% or more. Renal artery stenosis was bilateral in 3.7% of patients and high grade (>70% stenosis) in 7%. Patients with renal artery stenosis were more likely to have had a previous coronary intervention. In multivariate analysis, systolic blood pressure (odds ratio [OR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-138; P=.02), history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.27-5.78; P=.01), and cancer (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.02-3.82; P=.04) independently correlated with renal artery stenosis of 50% or more.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of incidental renal artery stenosis among hypertensive patients undergoing coronary catheterization is significant. Therefore, screening abdominal aortography should be considered in these patients to better define their risk of cardiovascular complications.

Renal Artery Stenosis

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) can accelerate or generate progressive hypertension and renal dysfunction. The goals for treating patients with RAS are to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality attributable to elevated arterial pressure and to preserve renal function beyond critical stenosis. Recent, randomized trials with current antihypertensive agents indicate that many patients with RAS can be managed for years without renal artery revascularization. As it does elsewhere, atherosclerotic disease can progress to more severe occlusion in the renal arteries. Rapid advances in endovascular techniques, including stenting, make restoration of renal blood flow possible in more patients than before. Therapeutic goals are achieved by 1) avoidance of tobacco, 2) reducing arterial pressure with antihypertensive drug therapy, particularly those agents capable of blocking the renin-angiotensin system, and 3) renal revascularization, using balloon angioplasty and stent placement, surgical bypass, or endarterectomy. The major clinical challenges are to identify progressive occlusive disease and to determine appropriate timing for vascular intervention.

Outcomes of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis managed without revascularization

OBJECTIVE

To determine how often patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS) managed without revascularization progress to accelerated hypertension and/or renal failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined the outcomes of 68 patients (mean +/- SEM age, 71.8 +/- 0.9 years) with high-grade (>70%) RAS identified between 1989 and 1993 who were treated without renal revascularization for at least 6 months after angiography. The time to last follow-up averaged 38.9 +/- 2.8 months. Other vascular beds were affected in 66 of the 68 patients. End points were revascularization, nephrectomy, dialysis, or death.

RESULTS

The mean +/- SEM serum creatinine level rose from 1.4 +/- 0.1 to 2.0 +/- 0.2 mg/dL (P<.001). Mean +/- SEM blood pressure did not change (157 +/- 3/83+/-2 vs 155 +/- 3/79 +/- 2 mm Hg), but the need (mean +/- SEM) for medication increased from 1.6+/-0.1 to 1.9+/-0.1 drugs (P=.02). Four patients (5.8%) eventually underwent renal revascularization for refractory hypertension (1 patient), for progressive stenosis (1 patient), and during aortic reconstruction (2 patients). One additional patient underwent nephrectomy to improve blood pressure control. Five others (7.4%) developed end-stage renal disease (ESRD) for reasons other than progressive vascular disease, namely, diabetes (3 patients), atheroemboli (1 patient), and contrast toxicity without RAS progression (1 patient). In 1 further case, the reason for ESRD was unknown, and it may have been caused by vascular occlusion. During follow-up, 19 patients died of unrelated causes, including myocardial infarction and stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that antihypertensive medication requirements increased and renal function deteriorated modestly in a subset of patients with atherosclerotic RAS managed initially without vascular intervention. Many achieved stable blood pressure for many years. Deterioration of renal function and mortality risk were greatest in patients with bilateral stenosis or stenosis to a solitary functioning kidney. These results reinforce the need for meticulous follow-up for disease progression but underscore the role of competing risks and high mortality from other cardiovascular diseases, which primarily determine the outcomes in patients with RAS and widespread atherosclerotic disease.