Hyperdiploidy and apparent aneusomy in mesothelial cells from non-malignant effusions as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

Utility of Flow Cytometry Analysis in the Detection of Nonhematologic Neoplasms: An Overview

Flow cytometry analysis has stood the test of time as a powerful tool in the assessment of hematologic neoplasms. The role of flow cytometry has expanded to evaluate various nonhematologic neoplasms encountered in body cavity malignant effusions, lymph nodes, and other body sites. This review explores the use of routine antibody panels as well as specially designed multicolor antibody panels that have been investigated by different groups and reported in the literature for evaluating nonhematologic neoplasms. In this context, the limitations, pitfalls, future directions, and promising applications of flow cytometry analysis are also discussed.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization as adjunct to cytology improves the diagnosis and directs estimation of prognosis of malignant pleural effusions

Background

The identification of malignant cells in effusions by conventional cytology is hampered by its limited sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as adjuncts to conventional cytologic examination in patients with malignant pleural effusions.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 93 inpatients with pleural effusions (72 malignant pleural effusions metastatic from 11 different organs and 21 benign) over 23 months. All the patients came from Chinese northeast areas. Aspirated pleural fluid underwent cytologic examination and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for aneuploidy. We used FISH in single-colour or if appropriate in dual-colour evaluation to detect chromosomal aberrations (chromosomes 7, 11, and 17) in effusion cells as markers of malignancy, to raise the diagnostic yield and identified the efficiency by diagnostic biopsy. Predominant cytogenetic anomalies and patterns of intratumor cytogenetic heterogeneity were brought in relation to overall survival rate.

Results

Cytology alone confirmed malignant pleural effusions in 45 of 72 patients (sensitivity 63%), whereas FISH alone positively identified 48 of 72 patients (sensitivity 67%). Both tests had high specificity in predicting benign effusions. If cytology and FISH were considered together, they exhibited 88% sensitivity and 94.5% specificity in discriminating benign and malignant effusions. Combined, the two assays were more sensitive than either test alone. Although the positive predictive value of each test was 94.5%, the negative predictive value of cytology and FISH combined was 78%, better than 47% and 44% for FISH and cytology alone, respectively. There was a significantly prolonged survival rate for patients with aneuploidy for chromosome 17.

Conclusions

FISH in combination with conventional cytology is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool for detecting malignant cells in pleural effusions . The high sensitivity and specificity may be associated with geographic area and race. Simple numeric FISH anomalies may be prognostic.

The utility of fluorescence in-situ hybridization in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Molecular tools are used to refine the diagnosis of malignancy in pleural fluids. This review discusses the rationale and recent findings of the application of one of these tools, fluorescence in-situ hybridization, in pleural effusions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Aneuploidy (i.e., pronounced numeric and structural chromosomal changes) is a recurrent finding in cells of solid tumors. Different methods attempt to detect tumor-associated aneuploidy to prove micrometastasis in different compartments, such as urine, cerebrospinal fluid, bone marrow, and body fluids. In recent years, fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis has proved viable for detecting metastasis based on the observation of matching patterns of chromosomal aneusomies in primary tumors and corresponding metastasis.

SUMMARY

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis using specific probes for visualizing numeric aberrations in a microscopic evaluation (thus complementing routine cytologic evaluation) has been shown to be relatively simple, very robust, and thus applicable in material of lesser quality and more sensitive than routine cytology. Remarkably, dual-color fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis allows for an efficient analysis in effusions, and the approach presented in this review proved to be more specific than other molecular procedures applied in effusions to detect malignancy, such as polymerase chain reaction. Prospective studies are needed to demonstrate that refinement of staging by fluorescence in-situ hybridization or polymerase chain reaction ('molecular upstaging') will translate into meaningful therapeutic consequences.

FISH cytogenetics and prognosis in breast and non-small cell lung cancers

BACKGROUND

Interphase cytogenetics by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been demonstrated to be a valuable diagnostic tool in effusions from patients with solid tumors. As the next step, we investigated whether certain patterns of numeric aberrations in malignant effusion cells supply prognostic information.

METHODS

From a large series of effusions from patients with solid tumors, 55 effusions from breast cancer and 39 effusions from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were classified as malignant by cytology or FISH. Tumor cells were classified as FISH aneuploid for chromosome 11 and/or 17 or as not aneuploid. Predominant cytogenetic anomalies and patterns of intratumor cytogenetic heterogeneity were brought in relation to overall survival rate.

RESULTS

There was no difference with respect to overall survival rate when effusions with or without aneuploidy for chromosomes 11 and 17 were compared. Likewise, in effusions with aneuploidy, there was no difference in overall survival rate among patients with different modal chromosome copy numbers (e.g., trisomy vs. tetrasomy 11) or among patients with a low or high grade of intratumor complexity (defined by the intratumor heterogeneity of FISH aneuploidy). In breast cancer, aneuploidy with gain of chromosome 11 was associated with a significantly superior survival rate, suggesting that amplification of chromosome 11 DNA is associated with a less aggressive phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple chromosomal changes as determined by FISH, such as gain of chromosome 11 copy numbers in breast cancer, may be prognostic. Prospective studies in primary tumors that classify distinct prognostic groups by FISH cytogenetics are warranted.

Sensitive detection of tumour cells in effusions by combining cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH)

Diagnosis of malignant cells in effusions is important for staging procedures and resulting therapeutic decisions. Cytodiagnostics in effusions is sometimes difficult since reactive mesothelial cells can mimic malignant cells. We used fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in single-colour or if appropriate in dual-colour evaluation to detect chromosomal aberrations in effusion cells as markers of malignancy, to raise the diagnostic yield. Cytologic and FISH evaluations – by using probes representing several chromosomes always including chromosomes 11 and 17 – were performed in 358 effusion fluids. Cytology was positive for malignancy in 44.4% of all effusions, whereas FISH was positive in 53.9% (P=0.0001). The combination of cytology and FISH was diagnostic for malignancy in 60.9% of effusions. Diagnostic superiority of FISH was demonstrated in effusions from breast cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and in effusions from the entire group of gynaecological and gastrointestinal carcinomas. In transudates (effusion protein <2.5 g dl⁻¹), malignant cells were detectable by cytology, FISH, and combined use of both methods in 18.6, 30, and 37.1% of effusions, respectively, suggesting that cytologic and molecular analysis should be performed also with transudates. In conclusion, FISH in combination with conventional cytology is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool for detecting malignant cells in effusions.

Combination of cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization for aneuploidy, and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for human mammaglobin/mammaglobin B expression improves diagnosis of malignant effusions

PURPOSE

The identification of malignant cells in effusions by conventional cytology is hampered by its limited sensitivity. The aim of this study was to improve tumor cell detection in effusions by molecular approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 157 effusions from patients with tumors and 72 effusions from patients without a history or evidence of malignancy were included in this study. All effusion specimens were evaluated in parallel by cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for aneuploidy, and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for expression of human mammaglobin (hMAM) and mammaglobin B (hMAM-B).

RESULTS

In effusions from patients with tumors, the sensitivities of tumor cell detection by cytology, FISH, and hMAM and hMAM-B detection were 46.2%, 53.3%, 36.4%, and 57.7%, respectively. The corresponding specificities were 94.4%, 97.0%, 87.1%, and 88.6%. Notably, a high percentage of effusions containing malignant cells were in fact transudates, indicating the necessity for molecular diagnostic work-up of transudates collected from patients with tumors. Dependent on the tumor type, the use of appropriate marker combinations improved tumor cell detection in effusions significantly. By combining all four diagnostic tests, a positive test result indicating the presence of malignancy was achieved in 81.1%, with a fairly good specificity of 70.1%.

CONCLUSION

Molecular techniques are definitely useful to detect malignancy in cytologically negative effusions. Tumor cell detection in effusions can be significantly improved by FISH and PCR techniques applying appropriate molecular markers. This finding should help to improve tumor staging, prognostic assessment, and treatment monitoring.

Malignant cell detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in effusions from patients with carcinoma

Cytological diagnosis of malignant cells in effusions is hampered by difficulties in the differentiation from reactive mesothelial cells. Because interphase cytogenetics by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) might complement cytological evaluation, we determined the power of tumor cell detection using FISH and cytology in 201 effusions from patients with advanced cancer. Furthermore, 9 primary breast tumors were FISH-karyotyped, and chromosomal aberrations were compared with those of corresponding metastatic effusion cells. By using centromeric probes representing chromosomes 7, 8, 11, 12, 17, and 18, a rate of malignancy-associated aneusomy combined for the 6 chromosomes was detected in an overall of 44.8% of effusion specimens (range, 31.8% to 39.3% for the individual chromosome), comparable to cytology (43.3%). The combination of just 2 FISH probes (namely, representing chromosome pairs 8/11 and 8/17) was almost equally efficient in the identification of aneusomy. Approximately one fourth of the cytologically negative effusions were FISH positive and vice versa. From the initially FISH-negative effusions, 18.9% could be subsequently classified positive with dual-color FISH by visualization of intranuclear chromosomal complexity in rare aneuploid cells. Thus, "overall FISH analysis," including dual-color evaluation, identified tumor cells in significantly more effusions (55.2%, P = .001) than conventional cytology, implying greater sensitivity. Finally, our finding that numerical aberration patterns in primary breast tumors and corresponding metastatic effusions are comparable indicates that FISH examination of primary tumors will indicate the centromeric probe(s) best suited for an efficient search for metastasis in the individual case.