Neural generators of tibial nerve P30 somatosensory evoked potential studied in patients with a focal lesion of the cervicomedullary junction

Plastic interactions between hand and face cortical representations in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a somatosensory-evoked potentials study

Neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies suggest that pain may play a major role in determining cortical somatosensory rearrangements even in the adult brain. The re-organizational power of pain, however, has been tested in models in which massive deafferentation co-existed with pain (e.g. in phantom pain). Moreover, information on whether spinal and brainstem changes contribute to pain-related plasticity in humans is meagre. We used the non-invasive somatosensory evoked potentials technique in patients with right primary trigeminal neuralgia and no clinical signs of large-diameter fibers of trigeminal deafferentation to assess whether pain may induce plastic changes at multiple levels in the somatosensory system. Subcortical and cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the right median and posterior tibial nerves ipsilateral to the facial pain were compared with those obtained following stimulation of the left median and tibial nerves and with those obtained in a control group tested in comparable conditions. Amplitudes of parietal N20 and P27 and frontal N30 potentials observed following stimulation of the right median nerve ipsilateral to the facial pain were greater than those of the left median nerve and showed a positive correlation with magnitude of pain. This right-left asymmetry was absent following stimulation of the patients' tibial nerves and in control subjects. No changes were found in spinal N13 and brainstem P14. That facial pain is associated with neuroplastic changes within the somatic cortical representation of the hand suggests a pain-related topographic cortical reorganisation.

Functional plasticity in the human primary somatosensory cortex following acute lesion of the anterior lateral spinal cord: neurophysiological evidence of short-term cross-modal plasticity

The primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in adult animals and humans is capable of rapid modification after deafferentation. These plastic changes may account for a loss of tonic control by nociceptive inputs over inhibitory mechanisms within structures of the dorsal column-medial lemniscal system. Most studies, however, have been performed under conditions where deafferentation of C and A delta fibres coexists with large-diameter fibres deafferentation. In this study the effect of the acute lesion of one ascending anterior lateral column on neuronal activity within the dorsal column-medial lemniscal system was assessed by recording somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in seven patients who underwent unilateral percutaneous cervical cordotomy (PCC) as treatment for drug-resistant malignant pain.Spinal, brainstem and cortical SEPs were recorded 2h before and 3h after PCC by stimulating the posterior tibial nerve at both ankles. Amplitudes of cortical potentials obtained by stimulation of the leg contralateral to PCC were significantly increased after PCC. No significant changes in spinal or brainstem potentials were observed. PCC did not affect SEP components obtained by stimulation of the leg ipsilateral to PCC. Our results suggest that nociceptive deafferentation may induce a rapid modulation of cortical neuronal activity along the lemniscal pathway, thus providing the first evidence in humans of short-term cortical plasticity across the spinothalamic and lemniscal systems.

Sensory and motor interfering influences on somatosensory evoked potentials

The interfering influences by which the different components of the early somatosensory evoked potentials are modified are reviewed from both neurophysiologic and clinical perspectives. Special consideration is given to the specific differences between sensory and motor interferences. In this context, the specific effect of the mental movement simulation task on the frontal N30 component is discussed in relation to the involvement of this evoked wave as a physiologic index of the dopaminergic motor pathways. Relevant interfering approaches, including concurrent events ranging from tactile stimulation to locomotion, are reviewed and discussed insofar as these data provide insights into the neurophysiologic processes of interaction between competing internal models controlling motor acts and sensory information.

Antidromic corticospinal tract potential of the brain

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel potential component (antidromic corticospinal tract potential, ACSP) of the brain after translaminar spinal stimulation of a relaxed patient during scoliosis surgery. To study the origin of this component and to compare its source to known sources of the somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs).

METHODS

We studied 17 consecutive patients during posterior scoliosis surgery. SEPs and ACSPs were elicited by translaminar spinal stimulation at the Th 2 and L 1 levels. ACSPs and SEPs were recorded on the scalp midline. Neurogenic motor evoked potentials (NMEPs) were recorded on the popliteal spaces. Preoperative tibial SEPs were also recorded.

RESULTS

ACSP was distinctly separated from the corresponding spinally evoked cortical SEP that showed longer latency than the ACSP. ACSPs decreased and disappeared when stimulation was moved to the caudal direction in the conus region while SEP persisted. In addition, the hemispheric origin of ACSP was confirmed with multichannel midline recordings of the scalp and neck. Thus there was no confusion to the response of nucleus gracilis, corresponding the P 31 response of the tibial nerve SEP.

CONCLUSIONS

The origin of ACSP seemed to be in the rostral part of the corticospinal tract. ACSP diminished in the conus region when stimulation was moved caudally and it disappeared when the stimulus was given to the root level. This proves that ACSP is not a response of the somatosensory tract, instead ACSP represents antidromic response of the pyramidal tract. ACSP can be used in monitoring of the motor tracts during scoliosis surgery together with NMEPs.

Abnormal central integration of a dual somatosensory input in dystonia. Evidence for sensory overflow

Several observations suggest impaired central sensory integration in dystonia. We studied median and ulnar nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in 10 patients who had dystonia involving at least one upper limb (six had generalized, two had segmental and two had focal dystonia) and in 10 normal subjects. We compared the amplitude of spinal N13, brainstem P14, parietal N20 and P27 and frontal N30 SEPs obtained by stimulating the median and ulnar nerves simultaneously (MU), the amplitude value being obtained from the arithmetic sum of the SEPs elicited by stimulating the same nerves separately (M + U). Throughout the somatosensory system, the MU : (M + U) ratio indicates the interaction between afferent inputs from the two peripheral nerves. No significant difference was found between SEP amplitudes and latencies for individually stimulated median and ulnar nerves in dystonic patients and normal subjects, but recordings in patients yielded a significantly higher percentage ratio [MU : (M + U)x100] for spinal N13 brainstem P14 and cortical N20, P27 and N30 components. The SEP ratio of central components obtained in response to stimulation of the digital nerves of the third and fifth fingers was also higher in patients than in controls but the difference did not reach a significant level. The possible contribution of subliminal activation was ruled out by recording the ratio of SEPs in six normal subjects during voluntary contraction. This voluntary contraction did not change the ratio of SEP suppression. These findings suggest that the inhibitory integration of afferent inputs, mainly proprioceptive inputs, coming from adjacent body parts is abnormal in dystonia. This inefficient integration, which is probably due to altered surrounding inhibition, could give rise to an abnormal motor output and might therefore contribute to the motor impairment present in dystonia.

Evidence for an abnormal cortical sensory processing in dystonia: selective enhancement of lower limb P37-N50 somatosensory evoked potential

We evaluated brain stem P30, contralateral frontal N37, and the vertex-ipsilateral central P37, N50 somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) obtained in response to stimulation of the tibial nerve in 10 patients with idiopathic dystonia. Results were compared with those obtained in 10 healthy subjects matched for age and sex. The amplitude of the brain stem P30 potential and of the contralateral frontal N37 response in dystonic patients was not significantly different from that recorded in normal subjects. The vertex- ipsilateral central P37-N50 complex, which is thought to originate in the pre-rolandic cortex, was significantly enhanced in patients compared with the control group. These results suggest the enhancement of the vertex-ipsilateral central P37-N50 complex might reflect an abnormal response to somatosensory inputs of a precentral cortex which is excessively activated because of a disorder of the basal ganglia. Such inefficient sensory processing in motor areas might contribute to motor impairment in dystonia.

Parkinson's disease and lower limb somatosensory evoked potentials: apomorphine-induced relief of the akinetic-rigid syndrome and vertex P37-N50 potentials

We evaluated brainstem P30, vertex-central P37-N50 and contralateral frontal N37 somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) from the tibial nerve in 14 patients affected by Parkinson's disease (PD) with akinetic-rigid syndrome. In seven patients SEPs were recorded after administration of apomorphine. The cortical P37-N50 complex was either absent (five patients, eight tested sides) or significantly smaller in patients as compared to the control group (n = 18). There was a relationship between abnormalities of early vertex potentials and degree of motor impairment. Administration of apomorphine was followed by an increase in amplitude of P37-N50 response, which was maximal after 15-30 min and then progressively returned to basal values in parallel with clinical improvement. Amplitude of brainstem P30 and frontal N37 responses was within normal values and did not vary following drug administration. These results suggest that the P37-N50 complex arises from independent cortical generators, probably located in the pre-rolandic cortex, which may be selectively affected by basal ganglia dysfunction. Amplitude decrease of the P37-50 complex may reflect an abnormal processing of somatosensory inputs within the pre-central cortex due to defective modulation exerted by basal ganglia circuitry on cortical excitability. SEP potentiation following apomorphine, besides indicating that this dysfunction is partly reversible, might suggest objective method to measure therapeutic efficacy.

Selective gating of lower limb cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) during passive and active foot movements

We evaluated subcortical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in response to posterior tibial nerve stimulation in 4 experimental conditions of foot movement and compared them with the baseline condition of full relaxation. The experimental conditions were: (a) active flexion-extension of the stimulated foot; (b) active flexion-extension of the non-stimulated foot; (c) passive flexion-extension of the stimulated foot in complete relaxation; (d) tonic active flexion of the stimulated foot. We analyzed latencies and amplitudes of the subcortical P30 potential, of the contralateral pre-rolandic N37 and P50 responses and of the P37, N50 and P60 potentials recorded over the vertex. Latencies did not vary in any of the paradigms. The amplitude of subcortical P30 potential did not change during any of the paradigms. Among the cortical waves, P37, N50 and P60 amplitudes were significantly attenuated in all conditions except active movement of the non-stimulated foot (b). This attenuation was less during passive (c) than during active movements of the stimulated foot (a and d). The contralateral pre-rolandic waves N37 and P50 showed no significant decrease during any of the paradigms. These results suggest that gating occurs rostrally to the cervico-medullary junction, probably at cortical level. The different behavior of N37, P50 and P37, N50 cortical responses during movement of the stimulated foot provides evidence suggestive of a highly localized gating process occurring at cortical level. These potentials could reflect activation of separate, functionally distinct generators.