Support of acute liver failure patients with a bioartificial liver

Anesthesia for liver transplant surgery

Liver transplantation offers patients with liver disease an optimal chance for long-term survival. Current indications, preoperative assessment, patient selection, intraoperative anesthetic management and outcomes are described. The management of special situations, including retransplantation, pediatric transplantation, and fulminant hepatic failure are also reviewed. The success of liver transplantation has led to increased demand. This demand, coupled with a nonexpanding supply of deceased donor organs, has resulted in a shortage of grafts and prolonged waiting times. Novel solutions using segmental liver grafts from living donors, and the challenges associated with this approach, are discussed.

A method to assess biochemical activity of liver cells during clinical application of extracorporeal hybrid liver support

Biochemical activity of a hybrid liver support system based on porcine liver cells was investigated in patients suffering from acute liver failure, coma stage III-IV Patient plasma was drawn systemically and after circulation through the bioreactor at four hour intervals. A method is used that takes into account the rate of plasma flow and the differences in plasma concentration systemically and after circulation through the liver support system to determine the net release or uptake of metabolites such as ammonia, urea and glucose. Urea release (mean 2.28+/-0.37 micromol/h/g cells) and ammonia uptake (mean 0.17+/-0.11 micromol/h/g cells) was seen during treatment, an active role of the system in glucose metabolism was observed. All patients were bridged successfully to liver transplantation.

Hepatocyte liver-assist systems--a clinical update

Liver failure is a serious problem that affects thousands of people in the United States each year. Other than liver transplantation, a supportive therapy has been unavailable for patients with liver failure that is refractory to medical treatment. An apparent solution to this problem is a hepatocyte liver-assist system. Such a system is composed of mammalian hepatocytes loaded in a mechanical apparatus, such as a hollow fiber cartridge. During extracorporeal perfusion of the system, the hepatocytes provide metabolic function to the patient with liver failure. At least two extracorporeal hepatocyte systems have shown promise in human clinical trials of acute liver failure. In fact, one system has gained approval from the Food and Drug Administration for testing in a randomized multicenter clinical trial. In this article, key issues of clinical testing are reviewed, and major contributions and questions that remain unresolved are emphasized.

Clinical experience with a bioartificial liver in the treatment of severe liver failure. A phase I clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop a bioartificial liver (BAL) to treat patients with severe liver failure until they can be either transplanted or recover spontaneously.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Severe acute liver failure is associated with high mortality. Liver transplantation has emerged as an effective therapy for patients who did not respond to standard management. However, because of the donor organ shortage and urgent need for transplantation, many patients die before they can be transplanted and others do not survive after transplantation, primarily because of intracranial hypertension.

METHODS

Three groups of patients with severe acute liver failure were treated with the BAL. In group 1 (n = 18) were patients with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF), in group 2 (n = 3) were patients with primary nonfunction (PNF) of a transplanted liver, and in group 3 (n = 10) were patients with acute exacerbation of chronic liver disease. Patients in groups 1 and 2 were candidates for transplantation at the time they entered the study, whereas patients in group 3 were not.

RESULTS

In group 1, 16 patients were "bridged" successfully to transplantation, 1 patient was bridged to recovery without a transplant, and 1 patient died because of concomitant severe pancreatitis. In group 2, all patients were bridged successfully to retransplantation. In group 3, two patients were supported to recovery and successful transplants at later dates; the other eight patients, although supported temporarily with the BAL, later died because they were not candidates for transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' clinical experience with the BAL has yielded encouraging results. A randomized, controlled, prospective trial (phase II-III) is being initiated to determine the efficacy of the system.