Prospective, concurrent comparison of the Cobe Spectra and Haemonetics MCS-3P cell separators for leukapheresis after high-dose filgrastim in patients with hematologic malignancies

The Application of Two Different Blood Cell Separators to Harvest CD34+ Cells in Patients Suffering from Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

From January 1996 until now, thirty-eight PBSC procedures were carried out on 20 patients suffering from NHL, mobilized by polichemotherapy regimens plus recombinant human Granulocyte-Growth Factor (rhG-CSF). Patients were enrolled in PBSC procedures using Dideco Excel (group A) and Cobe Spectra v.4.7 (group B) blood cell separators. Twelve patients were enrolled in group A (6 males and 6 females, median age 33) and 9 patients in group B (5 males and 4 females, median age 55). The mean White Blood Cell (WBC) and Mononuclear Cells Fraction (MNC) peripheral blood counts were not statistically different in either group and neither were blood CD34+ cell peripheral counts. CD34+ cell peripheral value was predictive of the CD34+ yield while mean values of harvested CD34+ cells were not significantly different. CD34+ cell efficiences were statistically the same. The CD34+ cell purity of the apheresis harvest was statistically different between the two groups (group A = 3.0 ± 2.2%; group B = 1 ± 0.9%) p = 0.001. High CD34+ cell yields were observed in both groups which confirms that both blood cell separators are able to harvest hematopoietic progenitor cells from peripheral blood.

Apheresis techniques for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells

The combination of effective mobilisation protocols and efficient use of apheresis machines has caused peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) transplantation to grow rapidly. The development of apheresis technology has improved over the years. Today PBSC procedures have changed towards systems to minimise operator interaction and to reduce the collection of undesired cells such as polymorphonuclear cells and platelets using functionally closed, sterile environments for PBSC collection in keeping with Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines. Blood cell separators with continuous flow technique allow the processing of more blood than intermittent flow devices resulting in higher PBSC yields. Large volume leukapheresis with the processing of 3-4-fold donor's/patient's blood volume can increase the number of collected progenitor cells. Therefore, intermittent flow cell separators are indicated if only single vein access is available. Anticoagulant induced hypocalcaemia is an often observed side effect in long lasting PBPC harvesting and monitoring of electrolytes should be performed especially at the end of the apheresis procedure to supplement low levels of potassium, calcium or magnesium. Refinement and improvement of collection techniques continue to add to the armamentarium of current approaches for cancer and non-malignant conditions and will enable future strategies.

Cobe Spectra is superior to Fenwal CS 3000 Plus for collection of hematopoietic stem cells

One hundred and seventy-seven stem cell apheresis procedures performed on 91 patients using the Fenwal CS 3000 Plus cell separator and 61 procedures performed on 37 patients using the Cobe Spectra cell separator were studied to compare the CD34(+) cell collection efficiencies (CE; the proportion of the total CD34(+) cell content in the blood volumes processed that is harvested) of the two machines. The absolute peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count was comparable for the two groups (P = 0.27). A strong correlation was seen between the blood CD34(+) cell count and the total number of CD34(+) cells collected for the Spectra (r(2) = 0.59; P < 10(-6)) and for the CS 3000 Plus (r(2) = 0.60; P < 10(-6)). No significant correlation emerged between the peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count and the CE of either machine. The total number of CD34(+) cells collected per procedure was comparable (P = 0.51): median 113 x 10(6) for CS 3000 Plus and median 218 x 10(6)for Spectra. CE was significantly higher with the Spectra (median 45.7%, range 9.8-98.6%) than the CS 3000 Plus (median 30.3%, range 1.7-89.3%; P < 0.00001). We conclude that the CD34(+) cell CE of the Spectra is superior to that of the CS 3000 Plus. Therefore, under the usual clinical conditions, Cobe Spectra should be used preferentially for peripheral blood progentor cell collection to maximize the number of hematopoietic stem cells collected.

CD34(+) cell collection efficiency does not correlate with the pre-leukapheresis hematocrit

One hundred and seventy-seven large-volume leukapheresis procedures performed on 91 patients over a 15 month period were reviewed to see if the pre-apheresis hematocrit (Hct) affected the CD34(+) cell collection efficiency (CE) of the Fenwal CS 3000 Plus cell separator. The Hct was 0.174-0.461 (median 0.317), and the peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count 2-2487 per microl (median 21). The total CD34(+) cell quantity collected was 3.0-2677.2 x 10(6) (median 113.0). Based on the number of CD34(+)cells contained in the blood volume processed (23.3-37303.2 x 10(6); median 318.0), the CE was 1.7-87.5% (median 30.3). No correlation was found between the Hct and CE (r(2) = 0.0034; P = 0.44) or the total CD34(+) cell quantity collected (r2 = 0.0040; P = 0.40). CEs for Hct <0.25 (median CE 36%), Hct 0.25-0.299 (median CE 30%) and Hct 0.30 (median CE 30%) were comparable. As expected, highly significant correlations were seen between the CD34(+) cell quantities collected and quantities processed (r2 = 0.59; P < 10(-6)) as well as the peripheral blood CD34(+) cell counts (r2= 0.60; P < 10(-6)). We conclude that the minimum acceptable Hct or hemoglobin level for leukapheresis should be dictated by clinical circumstances because it does not affect stem cell collection.

Prospective randomised concurrent comparison of the COBE spectra version 4.7, COBE spectra version 6 (Auto PBSCtrade mark), and haemonetics MCS+ cell separators for leucapheresis in patients with haematological and non haematological malignancies

A prospective study of three cell separators was undertaken to compare the mononuclear cell, CD34+ cell and CFU-GM yield. Twenty patients were entered in the study; all had received chemotherapy and daily G-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) up to and including the first day of leucapheresis. The first leucapheresis was performed on the first day the peripheral blood absolute CD34+ cell count was > or =20 cells/microl. All patients underwent two leucaphereses on consecutive days. The patients were randomised to undergo either the first or second leucapheresis using the COBE Spectra Version 4.7 and then randomised to either the COBE Spectra Version 6 or Haemonetics MCS+ for the other leucapheresis. The target durations of the procedure on the COBE Spectra Version 4.7 and Version 6 were 180 minutes or 2 total blood volumes (TBV), and for the Haemonetics MCS+ was 20 cycles with four recirculations. All machines were operated on the 1997 software supplied by the respective manufacturers. The time taken for the procedure was significantly longer with both the Haemonetics MCS+ and the COBE Spectra Version 6 than the COBE Spectra Version 4.7. Both COBE Spectra versions processed significantly larger volumes of blood than the Haemonetics MCS+. The absolute yield of mononuclear cells, CFU-GM and CD34+ cells were all significantly lower with the Haemonetics MCS+ compared with both COBE Spectra versions, as were the yields per unit volume of blood processed. The product volume was significantly higher with the COBE Spectra Version 4.7 compared to the other two machines. There was no significant difference in the reduction in the platelet count following leucapheresis with any of the machines. The COBE Spectra Version 6 is particularly useful for patients with potentially poor peripheral venous access because of its increased interface stability.

A prospective randomised concurrent comparison of the COBE Spectra Version 4.7, COBE Spectra Version 6 (auto PBSC) and Haemonetics MCS+ cell separators for leucapheresis in patients with haematological and non-haematological malignancies

A prospective study of the CD34+ cell collection efficiency of three cell separators was undertaken comparing the mononuclear cell, CD34+ cell and CFU-GM yield. Twenty patients were entered in the study, all had received mobilising chemotherapy and daily G-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously). The first leucapheresis was performed when the peripheral blood absolute CD34+ cell count was > or = 20 cells/microl. All patients underwent two leucaphereses on consecutive days. The patients were randomised to undergo either the first or second leucapheresis using the COBE Spectra Version 4.7 and then randomised to either the COBE Spectra Version 6 or Haemonetics MCS+ for the other leucapheresis. The target durations of the procedure on the COBE Spectra Version 4.7 and Version 6 were 180 min or two total blood volumes (TBV), and for the Haemonetics MCS+ was 20 cycles with four recirculations. All machines were operated on the 1997 software supplied by the respective manufacturers. The time taken for the procedure was significantly longer with both the Haemonetics MCS+ and the COBE Spectra Version 6 than the COBE Spectra Version 4.7. Both COBE Spectra versions processed significantly larger volumes of blood than the Haemonetics MCS+. The absolute yield of mononuclear cells, CFU-GM and CD34+ cells were all significantly lower with the Haemonetics MCS+ compared with both COBE Spectra Versions, as were the yields per unit volume of blood processed. There was no significant difference in the reduction in the platelet count following leucapheresis with any of the machines.

Comparison of marrow and blood cell yields from the same donors in a double-blind, randomized study of allogeneic marrow vs blood stem cell transplantation

Forty healthy adult donors underwent marrow (BM) as well as peripheral blood (PBSC) stem cell collections for their HLA-identical adult siblings with hematologic malignancies. BM was harvested on day 1 (target 3 x 108 nucleated cells/kg, 10 microg/kg lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) administered on days 2-6, and a single leukapheresis performed on day 6. The blood volume processed was the higher of 200% donor blood volume or 10 liters. The total nucleated cell (TNC) yields from PBSC were 1.1- to 4.3-fold higher than BM (median 7.0 vs 3.1 x 10(8)/kg, P < 0.0001). Although BM contained a higher proportion of CD34+cells (1.3% vs 0.7%, P < 0. 0001) and a comparable proportion of CD3+ cells (median 29% vs 26%, P = 0.4), the absolute numbers of CD34+ and CD3+ cells and their subsets were several times higher in PBSC. There was a poor correlation between BM and PBSC CD34 and TNC numbers, but a significant correlation between BM and PBSC CD3 numbers. Only five of 40 BM harvests contained >/=2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg compared with 35 of 40 PBSC harvests (P < 0.0001). We conclude that the numbers of progenitor and immunocompetent cells in PBSC are several times higher than in BM. It is possible to collect adequate numbers of progenitor cells from blood after lenograstim stimulation more frequently than from marrow, and donors yielding low quantities of progenitor cells from BM usually deliver better quantities from PBSC. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 501-505.

Improved collection of mobilized CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells by a novel automated leukapheresis system

BACKGROUND

For simplification of blood cell transplantation, an automated apheresis system that exploits a dual-stage channel device for mononuclear cell (MNC) collection (AutoPBSC, designed for the COBE Spectra) was studied.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The automated default software (AutoPBSC-Default) and three software modifications of the harvest frequency during leukapheresis, referred to as AutoPBSC-1.25, AutoPBSC-1.75, and AutoPBSC-2.75, were evaluated in comparison with the semiautomated Version 4.7 (V4.7) apheresis system in 119 leukapheresis procedures performed in 90 cancer patients treated with chemotherapy plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor. CD34+ cell and platelet collection efficiency (CE); volume and cell composition of the leukapheresis components; and patient platelet and red cell (RBC) loss during leukapheresis were measured.

RESULTS

The majority of collection measures evaluated with the AutoPBSC compared favorably to those obtained with the V4.7. CD34+ cell CE increased from 55 percent with V4.7 to 68 percent with the AutoPBSC-Default (p = 0.05). The AutoPBSC provided lower platelet contamination in the collected component (1.18 x 10(11) vs. 2.26 x 10(11) with the V4.7; p<0.001). The volume of the AutoPBSC-Default component was significantly lower (67 vs. 180 mL with the V4.7; p<0.001). The MNC purity of the AutoPBSC component was greater (52 vs. 28% with the V4.7; p<0.001), and the RBC contamination lower (AutoPBSC, 0.53 x 10(11) vs. 1.04 x 10(11) with the V4.7; p<0.001). Modifications of the AutoPBSC to increase the harvest frequency by 1.25-, 1.75-, and 2.75-fold resulted in increased CD34+ cell CE (77%, 75%, and 83%, respectively; p<0.001 in all cases), but also in reduced numbers of circulating platelets, higher platelet contamination of the component, and lower MNC purity than were seen with the AutoPBSC-Default.

CONCLUSION

The AutoPBSC offers the following advantages over the V4.7 system: a) better CE of CD34+ cells; b) reduced collection of platelets; c) reduced contamination of the leukapheresis component with granulocytes, platelets, and RBCs; d) reduced component volume; and e) automation.

A comparative study of a new, fully automated procedure and the standard mononuclear cell program using the Cobe Spectra for peripheral blood stem cell collection

Recently, a completely automated procedure, the AutoPBSC program for the COBE Spectra cell separator, has been developed for peripheral blood stem cell harvest (PBSCH). We compared the performance of the AutoPBSC program with the standard mononuclear cell (MNC) program in the same patients and in a donor. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were collected from 3 patients or a donor alternately using the MNC program and the AutoPBSC program in a course of PBSC mobilization. Equal blood volume was processed from each patient (200 ml/kg) and a donor (150 ml/kg). We used a harvest volume of 3 ml and a chase volume of 7 ml in all AutoPBSC procedures. The procedure duration was almost equivalent for both programs. The volume of products was significantly lower in the AutoPBSC program (71 +/- 13 ml) than in the MNC program (183 +/- 30 ml). MNC yields were fewer, and total nucleated cell (TNC) and MNC collection efficiency was less for the AutoPBSC program compared to the MNC program. The CD34+ cell collection efficiency was less for the AutoPBSC program (26.5 +/- 13.7%, compared with 77.7 +/- 60.6%; p > 0.05). The contamination of platelets and red cells was significantly less in the AutoPBSC program than in the MNC program. In conclusion, we consider that the collection efficiency in the new program should be improved by modification of parameters because there exist great advantages to automated procedures.