Retinal ganglion cell complex and visual evoked potentials in levetiracetam treatment

PURPOSE

To examine central macular, RNFL (retinal nerve fibre layer), GCC (ganglion cell complex) thicknesses; and VEPs (visual evoked potential) in epileptic patients using levetiracetam for at least one year.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen focal epileptic patients receiving levetiracetam monotherapy and 16 healthy subjects were included in the study. Central macular, RNFL and GCC thicknesses according to spectral domain OCT (optical coherence tomography); and VEPs parameters were compared between patients and healthy subjects.

RESULTS

The mean age of patient and control groups were 40 ± 16 and 38 ± 12 years respectively (p > 0.05). The patient group was on levetiracetam therapy for 64 ± 45 (12-168) months. Central macular thickness was thinner in the patient group (p = 0.008). There was no difference among groups regarding RNFL thicknesses. GCC thicknesses in all quadrants were similar among groups, except the superior quadrant; which was thinner in the patient group (p = 0.03). P100 amplitude in 30 min pattern was lower in the patient group (p = 0.04). N135 latency in 15 min (p = 0.03) and 7 min patterns (p = 0.01) was longer in the patient group.

CONCLUSION

Central macular and GCC thicknesses; and VEP parameters in patients receiving levetiracetam treatment may differ from healthy subjects.

Antiepileptic drugs and visual function

Antiepileptic drugs are known to result in visual disturbances. A number of antiepileptic drugs have recently been reported to result in various abnormalities of vision, particularly deficiencies in visual fields and color vision. Moreover, there has been a marked improvement in the diagnosis and understanding of the pathophysiology of visual disturbance. This review collects evidence for visual adverse effects induced by the older antiepileptic drugs (barbiturates, benzodiazepine, carbamazepine, valproic acid, ethosuximide, and phenytoin) and the newer ones (vigabatrin, topiramate, tiagabine, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, gabapentin, felbamate, and oxcarbazepine).

Oxcarbazepine reduces seizure frequency in a high proportion of patients with both newly diagnosed and refractory partial seizures in clinical practice

The antiepileptic efficacy and tolerability of oxcarbazepine, used both as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy, were observed for 1 year in 202 adult patients, aged 17-83 years, with newly diagnosed or refractory partial epilepsy in clinical practice in Italy. At first observation, the seizure free rate was 72.2% in newly diagnosed patients given monotherapy, 40% in patients in whom oxcarbazepine replaced another monotherapy and 10.3% in patients given oxcarbazepine as adjunctive therapy. At least 50% reduction in seizure frequency was achieved in 90.7, 72 and 57%, respectively. Efficacy increased with the duration of treatment (p < 0.0001). In the 160 completers the seizure free rate was 61.3% with monotherapy and 28% with adjunctive therapy. 16.3% of patients reported adverse effects, mainly sedation and sleepiness; 5% discontinued oxcarbazepine because of adverse events. OXC is an effective and well-tolerated antiepileptic agent for the long-term treatment of partial epilepsy in adults.

The effect of antiepileptic drugs on visual performance

Visual disturbances are a common side-effect of many antiepileptic drugs. Non-specific retino- and neurotoxic visual abnormalities, that are often reported with over-dosage and prolonged AED use, include diplopia, blurred vision and nystagmus. Some anticonvulsants are associated with specific visual problems that may be related to the mechanistic properties of the drug, and occur even when the drugs are administered within the recommended daily dose. Vigabatrin, a GABA-transaminase inhibitor, has been associated with bilateral concentric visual field loss, electrophysiological changes, central visual function deficits including reduced contrast sensitivity and abnormal colour perception, and morphological alterations of the fundus and retina. Topiramate, a drug that enhances GABAergic transmission, has been associated with cases of acute closed angle glaucoma, while tiagabine, a GABA uptake inhibitor, has been investigated for a potential GABAergic effect on the visual field. Only mild neurotoxic effects have been identified for patients treated with gabapentin, a drug designed as a cyclic analogue of GABA but exhibiting an unknown mechanism while carbamazepine, an inhibitor of voltage-dependent sodium channels, has been linked with abnormal colour perception and reduced contrast sensitivity. The following review outlines the visual disturbances associated with some of the most commonly prescribed anticonvulsants. For each drug, the ocular site of potential damage and the likely mechanism responsible for the adverse visual effects is described.

Proof of principle trials: exploratory open studies

The aims of the observational, early phase IIa studies are usually several in number and often competing, and therefore the priorities should be clearly defined. The preclinical data, particularly the mode(s) of action of the drug and the results on experimental models, can help to build hypotheses on the agent's potential efficacy for individual seizure types and syndromes. For ethical reasons, the population selected for the initial clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should be patients with continuing seizures (e.g. no less than two to four partial seizures/month) in spite of several therapeutic attempts using other appropriate AEDs, taken in monotherapy and in various combinations. Although the inherent bias in open, observational studies has limited their use in comparing treatments in epilepsy, they have several advantages over controlled trials, including lower cost, greater timeliness and inclusion of a broader range of patients. Observational, open studies with well-chosen patients and an adequate design tailored to answer precise predefined questions (including go/no go criteria) are most valuable for experienced clinicians in determining the clinical benefit of the drug, and for the pharmaceutical company in assessing the commercial merit of proceeding with further clinical testing.

Oxcarbazepine: double-blind, randomized, placebo-control, monotherapy trial for partial seizures

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxcarbazepine in a placebo-control trial.

METHODS

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-control, two-arm parallel group, monotherapy design was used to compare oxcarbazepine administered 1,200 mg twice daily to placebo in hospitalized patients with refractory partial seizures, including simple and complex partial seizures and partial seizures evolving to secondarily generalized seizures. Patients exited the trial after completing the 10-day double-blind treatment phase or after experiencing four partial seizures, two new-onset secondarily generalized seizures, serial seizures, or status epilepticus, whichever came first.

RESULTS

Analysis of the primary efficacy variable--time to meeting one of the exit criteria--showed a statistically significant effect in favor of oxcarbazepine (p = 0.0001). The secondary efficacy variables--percentage of patients who met one of the exit criteria (p = 0.0001) and total partial seizure frequency per 9 days during the double-blind treatment (p = 0.0001)--were also statistically significant in favor of oxcarbazepine.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that oxcarbazepine given as monotherapy is effective and safe for the treatment of partial seizures in this paradigm.