Hemodynamic effects of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors versus laparoscopic hepatic ultrasound examination.
J Clin Anesth 2012;
24:96-100. [PMID:
22301205 DOI:
10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.06.016]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2010] [Revised: 05/20/2011] [Accepted: 06/17/2011] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE
To compare the hemodynamic changes that occur during laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases with those occurring during laparoscopic ultrasound hepatic examination alone.
DESIGN
Prospective, observational study.
SETTING
Operating rooms of a university-affiliated hospital.
PATIENTS
40 ASA physical status 2 and 3 patients with liver metastases.
INTERVENTIONS
20 patients underwent laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors following laparoscopic ultrasound examination, and 20 had laparoscopic ultrasound examination alone. The anesthetic technique was standardized.
MEASUREMENTS
The primary endpoint of the study was the number of episodes of mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 70 mmHg. Secondary endpoints were significant differences between the groups in MAP, heart rate, cardiac index, ejection fraction (EF; both measured with thoracic bioimpedance), calculated systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), and central venous pressure.
MAIN RESULTS
The number of episodes of MAP < 70 mmHg did not differ between groups: there were 9 episodes in the ultrasound alone group and 7 in the radiofrequency group (P = 0.668). Cardiac index, EF, and SVRI were similar between groups. Central venous pressure was slightly higher in the radiofrequency group [11.99 (10.8-13.2) mmHg vs. 10.3 (9.2-11.4) mmHg, P = 0.04].
CONCLUSIONS
Hemodynamic profiles were similar when comparing laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases with laparoscopic ultrasound hepatic examination alone.
Collapse